| 00:08.21 | *** join/#uphpu TuxToaster (~TuxToaste@c-24-10-187-146.hsd1.ut.comcast.net) |
| 00:08.21 | *** mode/#UPHPU [+v TuxToaster] by ChanServ |
| 01:18.34 | TuxToaster | $rlart |
| 01:18.35 | raifbot | hooks into a hydrant and hoses kim27 down. |
| 01:18.55 | TuxToaster | bots seem to like hydrants. |
| 01:52.07 | *** join/#uphpu mindjuju (~mindjuju@173-10-26-193-BusName-utah.ut.hfc.comcastbusiness.net) |
| 01:52.07 | *** mode/#UPHPU [+o mindjuju] by ChanServ |
| 02:03.59 | *** join/#uphpu mgeary (~mgeary@69.169.142.45.provo.static.broadweavenetworks.net) |
| 02:04.00 | *** mode/#UPHPU [+v mgeary] by ChanServ |
| 02:43.35 | *** join/#uphpu mgeary (~mgeary@69.169.142.45.provo.static.broadweavenetworks.net) |
| 02:43.37 | *** mode/#UPHPU [+v mgeary] by ChanServ |
| 02:51.59 | *** join/#uphpu supernovia (~Adium@208.64.91.46.static.utbb.net) |
| 02:52.00 | *** mode/#UPHPU [+v supernovia] by ChanServ |
| 03:14.33 | *** join/#uphpu kendsnyder (~kendsnyde@207-224-200-141.slkc.qwest.net) |
| 03:14.33 | *** mode/#UPHPU [+v kendsnyder] by ChanServ |
| 03:28.24 | *** join/#uphpu supernovia (~Adium@208.64.91.46.static.utbb.net) |
| 03:28.24 | *** mode/#UPHPU [+v supernovia] by ChanServ |
| 03:49.11 | *** join/#uphpu SunSparc (~jonathan@70-57-81-129.slkc.qwest.net) |
| 03:49.11 | *** mode/#UPHPU [+v SunSparc] by ChanServ |
| 05:17.46 | *** join/#uphpu UtahDave (~boucha@c-174-52-220-233.hsd1.ut.comcast.net) |
| 05:17.46 | *** mode/#UPHPU [+o UtahDave] by ChanServ |
| 05:18.01 | *** join/#uphpu macnewbold1 (~macnewbol@66.219.204.99.provo.dynamic.broadweavenetworks.net) |
| 05:18.01 | *** mode/#UPHPU [+o macnewbold1] by ChanServ |
| 11:50.48 | *** join/#uphpu esion (~chatzilla@host86-162-82-33.range86-162.btcentralplus.com) |
| 13:48.30 | *** join/#uphpu mgeary (~mgeary@69.169.142.45.provo.static.broadweavenetworks.net) |
| 13:48.30 | *** mode/#UPHPU [+v mgeary] by ChanServ |
| 14:04.48 | *** join/#uphpu eggyknap (~jtolley@unaffiliated/eggyknap) |
| 14:04.49 | *** mode/#UPHPU [+v eggyknap] by ChanServ |
| 14:17.24 | *** join/#uphpu itimber (~Adium@204.10.232.242) |
| 14:17.27 | *** mode/#UPHPU [+v itimber] by ChanServ |
| 14:19.31 | *** join/#uphpu opapo (~quassel@204.113.97.235) |
| 14:19.31 | *** mode/#UPHPU [+v opapo] by ChanServ |
| 14:20.39 | *** join/#uphpu ninnypants (~ninnypant@unaffiliated/ninnypants) |
| 14:20.39 | *** mode/#UPHPU [+v ninnypants] by ChanServ |
| 14:21.59 | *** join/#uphpu josephscott (~josephsco@192.0.65.252) |
| 14:38.20 | *** join/#uphpu UtahDave (~boucha@63.230.12.160) |
| 14:38.20 | *** mode/#UPHPU [+o UtahDave] by ChanServ |
| 14:41.56 | *** join/#uphpu supernovia (~Adium@208.64.91.46.static.utbb.net) |
| 14:41.56 | *** mode/#UPHPU [+v supernovia] by ChanServ |
| 14:46.40 | *** join/#uphpu macnewbold (~macnewbol@66.219.204.98.provo.dynamic.broadweavenetworks.net) |
| 14:46.40 | *** mode/#UPHPU [+o macnewbold] by ChanServ |
| 14:56.54 | *** join/#uphpu mgeary (~mgeary@97.75.176.122) |
| 14:56.55 | *** mode/#UPHPU [+v mgeary] by ChanServ |
| 15:06.28 | *** join/#uphpu mahelious (~mahelious@ip65-46-59-10.z59-46-65.customer.algx.net) |
| 15:06.28 | *** mode/#UPHPU [+v mahelious] by ChanServ |
| 15:06.39 | *** part/#uphpu Skinner (~david@74-81-246-9.static.sdyl005.digis.net) |
| 15:06.50 | *** join/#uphpu Skinner (~david@74-81-246-9.static.sdyl005.digis.net) |
| 15:06.50 | *** mode/#UPHPU [+v Skinner] by ChanServ |
| 15:09.51 | *** join/#uphpu kendsnyder (~kendsnyde@71-219-23-186.slkc.qwest.net) |
| 15:09.51 | *** mode/#UPHPU [+v kendsnyder] by ChanServ |
| 15:15.53 | *** join/#uphpu littleSkinner (~JSkinn@asa-2.fbp.ore.fiber.net) |
| 15:27.59 | *** join/#uphpu DC (~DC@neutroninteractive-xmission.xmission.com) |
| 15:38.37 | *** join/#uphpu wGEric (~wGEric@107.0.84.214) |
| 15:38.39 | *** join/#uphpu wGEric (~wGEric@unaffiliated/wgeric) |
| 15:39.12 | *** join/#uphpu MikeHansenMe (~mike@RVTNUTMADS0CU02.mcleodusa.net) |
| 15:45.45 | ninnypants | $rlart |
| 15:45.46 | raifbot | blames carmony for all the evil in the world. |
| 15:49.44 | *** join/#uphpu mgeary (~mgeary@67.136.112.81) |
| 15:49.44 | *** mode/#UPHPU [+v mgeary] by ChanServ |
| 15:58.48 | *** join/#uphpu john_anderson (~john_ande@192.150.9.200) |
| 15:58.48 | *** mode/#UPHPU [+v john_anderson] by ChanServ |
| 16:02.46 | mgeary | hey fungus, you have experience with procmail and postfix+dovecot virtual users? |
| 16:03.12 | fungus | procmail yes, postfix yes, dovecot no. |
| 16:04.02 | mgeary | does dovecot play a role there? That is, if i have dovecot enabled, will it influence if/how i can use procmail? |
| 16:04.07 | *** join/#uphpu john_anderson (~john_ande@192.150.9.200) |
| 16:04.08 | *** mode/#UPHPU [+v john_anderson] by ChanServ |
| 16:06.11 | fungus | dovecot is just a POP/IMAP server. It just serves up whatever mail files/dirs that it's configured for. |
| 16:06.26 | fungus | Procmail can be used to deliver to those mail files/dirs very easily |
| 16:07.45 | fungus | procmail is a delivery agent. It can be used to replace the built-in one postfix normally uses. |
| 16:08.31 | fungus | Usually by specifying "mailbox_command = /usr/bin/procmail" in your main.cf |
| 16:09.08 | fungus | of course you'll want to configure procmail to deliver to the correct directories. |
| 16:25.53 | mgeary | yeah |
| 16:25.53 | mgeary | ok |
| 16:26.17 | mgeary | i'm just sick of my iPhone not having any mail rules, so i want to auto-delete emails that have [SPAM] in the subject line |
| 16:26.23 | mgeary | gotta head offline now, but thanks for the info |
| 16:30.56 | ninnypants | What's the best way to get a asp.net site up and running quick? I figure the easiest way is to just set up a windows server on godaddy and throw it up there |
| 16:33.51 | utahcon | Write it in PHP |
| 16:36.47 | *** join/#uphpu john_anderson (~john_ande@192.150.9.200) |
| 16:36.47 | *** mode/#UPHPU [+v john_anderson] by ChanServ |
| 16:38.05 | DexterTheDragon | in my experience rewriting an app is much faster than successfully deploying to a windows server |
| 16:39.36 | ninnypants | we just want to look at a clients old website so I just need to throw something like 5-10 files up and look at the output |
| 16:40.09 | ninnypants | I'm not sure it's worth a lot since from what I've seen it has code for IE5.5 |
| 16:41.04 | mindjuju | howdy DtD, lookie what i found! - http://blog.foreignpolicy.com/posts/2013/04/23/ron_paul_fans_furious_over_rand_pauls_drone_flip_flop |
| 16:41.46 | *** join/#uphpu SunSparc (~jonathan@69-27-175-74.acedatacenter.com) |
| 16:41.46 | *** mode/#UPHPU [+v SunSparc] by ChanServ |
| 16:42.07 | SunSparc | ~Wednesday |
| 16:42.07 | ibot | Wednesday sucks, because it is only half way through the week. |
| 16:43.44 | ninnypants | mindjuju: that's an expensive $50 in the liquor store scenario |
| 16:44.03 | mindjuju | so frustrating |
| 16:44.27 | mindjuju | the use of lethal force ISN'T to stop the crime, its because of the threat of harm to the policeman that auths him to kill |
| 16:44.37 | mindjuju | this fundamental shift is CRITICAL |
| 16:45.05 | mindjuju | or her(policewoman) |
| 16:45.41 | mindjuju | if you read further, he attempts to clear it up a little, but it leaves me uneasy |
| 16:46.14 | SunSparc | Police should just use sudo. "sudo drop the weapon; sudo put your hands above your head" |
| 16:46.38 | SunSparc | I think a kill -HUP would be better than a kill -9 |
| 16:46.55 | ninnypants | SunSparc: the perp is probably on windows ;) |
| 16:47.25 | SunSparc | lol, yeah, in that case, CTRL+ALT+DEL the punk. |
| 16:47.35 | DexterTheDragon | mindjuju: I'm more surprised people thought Rand Paul was any better than other politicians |
| 16:55.15 | mindjuju | DtD, sorry got a call |
| 16:55.23 | mindjuju | i was starting to slide into that group sadly |
| 16:59.29 | mindjuju | DtD, anyhow -- april has been a bad month for "trusting your local politician" |
| 16:59.37 | mindjuju | even Chaffetz voted for CISPA |
| 16:59.42 | mindjuju | didn't see that coming |
| 17:00.15 | ninnypants | mindjuju: I thought all the UT reps voted yea on things like that? |
| 17:00.55 | mindjuju | pains me to say it, but Chaffetz sang a good song about privacy and the 4th |
| 17:01.04 | mindjuju | but when it came time to vote, he showed otherwise |
| 17:01.13 | mindjuju | he's got a blog post i want to read on the whys |
| 17:01.43 | mindjuju | so ninnypants, in fairness, here is his reasoning - http://chaffetz.house.gov/CISPA |
| 17:02.06 | mindjuju | i HAVEN'T read it because i'm devoting every braincell not already allocated to work, school to openwest |
| 17:02.28 | mindjuju | with little exception like briefly scanning the news daily |
| 17:03.47 | josephscott | did Chaffetz vote for the protecting congress people from having to report their own insider trading as well? |
| 17:03.48 | mindjuju | i'll read it on the 5th |
| 17:03.59 | mindjuju | you know josephscott, i'm not sure |
| 17:04.04 | mindjuju | i know what you're talking about |
| 17:04.09 | mindjuju | i FB'd on it a while back |
| 17:04.36 | josephscott | there apparently was a new vote recently to "protect congress" from having to report their own insider trading deals |
| 17:04.44 | mindjuju | yup |
| 17:04.54 | mindjuju | there were actually 2 things that passed on near the same day |
| 17:05.17 | ninnypants | seems like good reasoning (though I don't know why CP made it into yet another bill) but only if the specific amendments he wants to get in actually get in |
| 17:06.20 | mindjuju | josephscott, the other was federally employed tax dodgers |
| 17:06.43 | mindjuju | even as i type it, i'm suppressing it in my head so i don't think about it until May 5th |
| 17:06.51 | josephscott | :-) |
| 17:07.02 | mindjuju | course though, i was against that bill myself |
| 17:07.53 | mindjuju | writing a law to go after a subsect of citizens when a law already applies to them and just requires enforcement builds, in my mind, a cast system |
| 17:08.20 | mindjuju | to these guys (federal employees), the laws don't apply so we need to write special laws for them |
| 17:08.26 | mindjuju | no, all laws apply to all people |
| 17:25.41 | *** join/#uphpu TuxToaster (~TuxToaste@66.219.204.99.provo.dynamic.broadweavenetworks.net) |
| 17:25.42 | *** mode/#UPHPU [+v TuxToaster] by ChanServ |
| 17:57.15 | *** join/#uphpu mgeary (~mgeary@65.127.208.182) |
| 17:57.15 | *** mode/#UPHPU [+v mgeary] by ChanServ |
| 18:18.22 | fungus | http://www.wired.com/threatlevel/2013/04/encrypt-your-data/ |
| 18:18.29 | fungus | Woot, encrypt all the things |
| 18:20.19 | *** join/#uphpu clintberry (~clintberr@c-174-52-0-89.hsd1.ut.comcast.net) |
| 18:20.19 | *** mode/#UPHPU [+v clintberry] by ChanServ |
| 18:22.41 | mgeary | so, fungus, if i set up the mailbox_command to be /usr/bin/procmail, and do nothing else, things will break until/unless i do something with procmail? |
| 18:22.55 | mgeary | i was under the impression it would only do special stuff if a procmailrc file existed |
| 18:23.25 | fungus | that's true, but the default delivery that procmail does may not be what you desire. |
| 18:23.51 | mgeary | my mail server handles mail for 2+ domains (virtual domains). Does that complicate matters? |
| 18:23.55 | fungus | How was postfix delivering mail before you changed it. |
| 18:25.06 | mgeary | not sure how to answer that |
| 18:26.09 | fungus | Was there already a mailbox_command defined? |
| 18:26.19 | mgeary | no |
| 18:26.21 | mgeary | commented out |
| 18:26.46 | fungus | care to pastebin your postfix config? |
| 18:26.52 | mgeary | sure |
| 18:27.59 | mgeary | sen via pm |
| 18:28.42 | fungus | ah, you use postfix virtual delivery. mailbox_command doesn't affect those. |
| 18:28.50 | mgeary | fun story: this guy was best buddies with my older brothers when they were young: http://www.deseretnews.com/article/765627836/Mormon-bishop-with-Samurai-sword-runs-off-attacker.html |
| 18:29.04 | mgeary | fungus: ah. so things just got more complicated? |
| 18:29.37 | fungus | yup |
| 18:29.42 | mgeary | bah |
| 18:30.10 | mgeary | this feels like it should be so simple. I just want [SPAM] emails auto moved out of the inbox :( |
| 18:34.48 | *** join/#uphpu josephscott (~josephsco@192.0.65.252) |
| 18:35.38 | fungus | mgeary, I think you are stuck, you have to rework your infrastructure to get server side rules. |
| 18:36.22 | mgeary | ok |
| 18:36.23 | mgeary | shoot |
| 18:36.25 | fungus | You would need to change postfix to deliver to dovecot's deliver tool instead of virtual_mailbox i think |
| 18:37.02 | fungus | Or write a system-wide procmail recipe that delivers emails in the same way postfix does now. |
| 18:37.11 | herlo | or maildrop or procmail |
| 18:37.41 | fungus | herlo, postfix can't do either of those when using virtual_mailbox stuff |
| 18:38.32 | herlo | fungus: well, i'm using dovecot-lmtp as a delivery agent, but I think it might be able to... |
| 18:38.57 | fungus | right. that works. but mgeary is using postfix virtual_mailbox for the delivery part. |
| 18:39.32 | herlo | but I recall using virtual_mailbox delivery in the past |
| 18:39.51 | herlo | for some reason, I thought you could add more MDAs on at the end... |
| 18:40.20 | fungus | nope. that's why I use virtual_aliases myself. |
| 18:42.51 | mgeary | bah. it's all over my head at this point |
| 18:43.15 | herlo | mgeary: it's actually pretty easy |
| 18:43.30 | herlo | what you have to consider is *how* postfix deals with things |
| 18:43.34 | herlo | and what stage you are in |
| 18:43.35 | fungus | mgeary, you can use this technique probably. |
| 18:43.37 | fungus | http://wiki.dovecot.org/LDA/Postfix |
| 18:43.39 | mgeary | gotta go get on a plane |
| 18:43.42 | mgeary | thanks |
| 18:43.42 | fungus | See section for "Virtual Users" |
| 18:43.58 | herlo | mgeary: yeah, postfix local delivery agents are good stuff. |
| 18:44.04 | fungus | Yeah they are. |
| 18:44.12 | herlo | fungus: he left, didn't he? |
| 19:03.16 | *** join/#uphpu undertakingyou (~undertaki@danix.eaerich.com) |
| 19:03.16 | *** mode/#UPHPU [+v undertakingyou] by ChanServ |
| 19:07.05 | TuxToaster | just had someone on a webinar say we needed to have "Internet 7.0" |
| 19:07.10 | TuxToaster | funny, because I thought we just hit Web 2.0... |
| 19:08.23 | herlo | TuxToaster: we're already through with 3.0. Come on man, keep up! |
| 19:08.25 | fungus | lol, Web is only at 2.0, but Internet is currently at 6 (IPv6). So the next version would be 7, right? :) |
| 19:08.25 | herlo | :D |
| 19:08.47 | herlo | mobile is 3.0 |
| 19:10.58 | *** join/#uphpu captbrogers (~captbroge@173-165-143-177-utah.hfc.comcastbusiness.net) |
| 19:11.12 | TuxToaster | lol |
| 19:11.22 | TuxToaster | I know she really meant IE 7 |
| 19:11.41 | TuxToaster | but the fact that their tool works with IE7 and Java gives me warm fuzzies when dealing with sensitive payment data. |
| 19:11.52 | TuxToaster | because, you know, that's the top in security. |
| 19:54.19 | unum | trying to decide if it's worth it to write the code to roll back to the new logging system |
| 19:55.14 | unum | I guess I could implement the new system in such a way that I don't break the old one |
| 20:04.14 | *** join/#uphpu MikeHansenMe (~mike@173-165-131-122-utah.hfc.comcastbusiness.net) |
| 20:22.02 | *** join/#uphpu opapo (~quassel@204.113.97.235) |
| 20:22.02 | *** mode/#UPHPU [+v opapo] by ChanServ |
| 20:26.31 | fungus | nagios, ack chlorine/smtp shut up |
| 20:26.43 | fungus | oops, wrong window |
| 20:28.19 | romanovic | anyone looking for full-time salaried work? And willing to develop in c#? |
| 20:30.22 | Skinner | romanovic: I know it wouldn't have been accurate, but it would have been funny if you asked: "anyone looking for full-time salaried work? XOR willing to develop in c#?" |
| 20:31.38 | *** join/#uphpu john_anderson (~john_ande@192.150.9.200) |
| 20:31.38 | *** mode/#UPHPU [+v john_anderson] by ChanServ |
| 20:32.03 | romanovic | hah, that might be accurate. |
| 20:32.48 | romanovic | of the people i know looking for work, none of them would be interested in c#. |
| 20:32.57 | romanovic | of the c# developers i know, none of them are looking for work |
| 20:49.42 | *** join/#uphpu ninnypants (~ninnypant@unaffiliated/ninnypants) |
| 20:49.43 | *** mode/#UPHPU [+v ninnypants] by ChanServ |
| 21:08.49 | DexterTheDragon | josephscott: http://arstechnica.com/business/2013/04/provo-doesnt-know-where-its-fiber-is-google-makes-city-spend-500000-to-find-i/ |
| 21:08.57 | DexterTheDragon | it just keeps getting crazier |
| 21:10.03 | josephscott | DexterTheDragon: this was a good article - http://www.heraldextra.com/news/state-and-regional/utah/provo-city-council-approves-google-fiber/article_a5807a7d-7d77-57b0-be45-4a38e70bd8e5.html |
| 21:10.13 | josephscott | "Provo mayor John Curtis says the city must pay $1.7 million to get the city ready for the handover" |
| 21:10.34 | josephscott | sorry, should have linked to http://www.heraldextra.com/news/local/central/provo/council-gives-google-fiber-unanimous-approval/article_f03f2da4-44dc-5732-8e95-eb1bfa2ff990.html |
| 21:11.23 | josephscott | so Provo is paying $1.7M for Google to take the fiber from them for 7 years |
| 21:12.36 | stevecoug | Provo is run by morons |
| 21:12.44 | stevecoug | Remember the anti-dancing city ordinance a few years ago? |
| 21:13.22 | DexterTheDragon | provo residents sure are paying a lot to install a monopoly |
| 21:13.41 | stevecoug | They've made UTOPIA look well-managed by comparison |
| 21:21.32 | josephscott | well, at least it is a monopoly that will give them high speed internet as reasonable prices for 7 years :-) |
| 21:22.06 | DexterTheDragon | is 5mb high speed? |
| 21:22.13 | josephscott | that is the free level |
| 21:22.23 | DexterTheDragon | yeah it's good for free |
| 21:22.24 | josephscott | I consider 1Gb/s high speed |
| 21:22.25 | stevecoug | higher than many DSL connections around here... |
| 21:22.40 | stevecoug | free is a reasonable price |
| 21:23.04 | josephscott | indeed |
| 21:23.13 | stevecoug | gigabit for $70 is a very reasonable price for that as well, so I'd say josephscott's point stands |
| 21:23.14 | josephscott | though not exactly true in the case of Provo |
| 21:23.36 | stevecoug | true, they'll be paying for it in their taxes... |
| 21:23.48 | josephscott | since Provo has a surcharge to on utility bills to pay off the original bond money |
| 21:23.59 | josephscott | they already are, in utility bills |
| 21:24.23 | josephscott | still, even if they surcharge was $10/mo, still a good deal for 1Gb/s |
| 21:25.57 | DexterTheDragon | but how long till the bond is paid off? I thought I heard like 11 years |
| 21:26.09 | josephscott | s/they/the/ |
| 21:26.22 | josephscott | DexterTheDragon: I think it is another dozen years |
| 21:27.10 | DexterTheDragon | so their "free" 7 years of internet is being paid for 11 years |
| 21:28.38 | josephscott | something like that |
| 21:28.43 | josephscott | the surcharge started in 2011 |
| 21:31.16 | josephscott | and who knows what happens after the 7 year commitment from Google ends |
| 21:31.24 | josephscott | we'll have to see how it all plays out |
| 21:31.52 | josephscott | I can this for certain though: I'd like to have a 1Gb/s connection at my house that costs me less than $100/mo |
| 21:32.04 | DexterTheDragon | google still owns it. they're just providing free for 7 years |
| 21:32.37 | josephscott | depends |
| 21:32.44 | josephscott | at the end of 7 years Google can bail on it |
| 21:32.52 | josephscott | the city has a buy back clause |
| 21:33.16 | josephscott | so if Google pulls out at the end of the 7 year deal, the city of Provo can repurchase it, for like $1 |
| 21:34.09 | josephscott | still leaves a few years of bonds to pay back, and they'd need someone else to come in to run it, or shut it down |
| 21:48.25 | *** mode/#UPHPU [+v romanovic] by ChanServ |
| 21:51.08 | mahelious | but remember, Google paid $1. Provo really only has to spend $1,699,999 :) |
| 21:57.00 | DexterTheDragon | plus the original $39 million construction cost |
| 22:04.05 | fungus | carmony, from #utah "<rsimpkins> Someone please tell KSL's web team they need to put more hamsters in the server." |
| 22:04.22 | carmony | rofl |
| 22:04.31 | *** part/#uphpu Bikerdan (~Dan@67.214.225.82) |
| 22:04.37 | TuxToaster | LOL |
| 22:04.45 | TuxToaster | that's not all they need. |
| 22:06.53 | Skinner | Yup. Wheels for the hamsters too! |
| 22:09.15 | jsmith | carmony: You need more than just more hamsters, right? |
| 22:09.36 | carmony | lol, yeah |
| 22:09.43 | carmony | the secret are the squirells |
| 22:10.04 | jsmith | That's what they're talking about in #utah |
| 22:10.14 | jsmith | Squirrels, monkeys, and special hamster wheels |
| 22:40.07 | *** join/#uphpu MikeHansenMe (~mike@173-165-131-122-utah.hfc.comcastbusiness.net) |
| 23:02.27 | carmony | is it even possible to have two fatal errors? |
| 23:03.36 | *** join/#uphpu Skinner (~david@74-81-246-9.static.sdyl005.digis.net) |
| 23:03.36 | *** mode/#UPHPU [+v Skinner] by ChanServ |
| 23:12.00 | SunSparc | carmony: Good question. I would not think so. |
| 23:12.26 | carmony | somehow I'm getting... drum roll please.... two |
| 23:12.33 | carmony | on the same web req |
| 23:13.14 | SunSparc | Heh, lucky. :) |
| 23:13.26 | SunSparc | Perhaps coming from multiple scripts? |
| 23:13.37 | SunSparc | Concurrent objects? |
| 23:14.02 | SunSparc | I am just guessing. Out for the day. Later. |
| 23:27.23 | *** join/#uphpu MikeHansenMe (~mike@173-165-131-122-utah.hfc.comcastbusiness.net) |