| 00:00.51 | ninnypants | captbrogers: I believe that DexterTheDragon knows quite a bit |
| 00:06.28 | captbrogers | I mostly want to know a non-confusing place to find good tutorials. All the ones offered by the developers assume too much on the user's part or are for a soon to be deprecated version |
| 00:09.37 | DexterTheDragon | http://book.cakephp.org/ |
| 00:09.58 | captbrogers | I went there Dexter, and it seemed to confuse me as much as help me |
| 00:11.13 | captbrogers | Maybe I just need to read through it again more carefully, but it didn't seem to make much sense this morning when I was trying it |
| 00:12.46 | captbrogers | Or perhaps you could answer this: Is there a good reason that I should use v1.3.x over v2.0? |
| 00:13.33 | DexterTheDragon | 2.0.5 is the current stable version |
| 00:14.33 | DexterTheDragon | I think the only real reason to use 1.3 is if you had code written for 1.2 |
| 00:15.07 | captbrogers | That's what I assumed, that it was a branch maintained for older applications. But it is just a struggle when I find a tutorial written for 1.3 |
| 00:16.56 | DexterTheDragon | the blog tutorial is usually a nice overview http://book.cakephp.org/2.0/en/tutorials-and-examples/blog/blog.html |
| 00:17.03 | ninnypants | captbrogers: chances are the tutorials will probably be accurate for 1.3 as well |
| 00:18.11 | ninnypants | s/1.3/2/ |
| 00:22.49 | *** join/#uphpu wps (~wps@wfw.apxalarm.com) |
| 00:22.50 | *** mode/#UPHPU [+o wps] by ChanServ |
| 00:30.56 | *** join/#uphpu wps (~wps@wfw.apxalarm.com) |
| 00:30.56 | *** mode/#UPHPU [+o wps] by ChanServ |
| 00:46.44 | *** join/#uphpu pelaofeliz (~pelaofeli@67.137.236.66) |
| 00:46.44 | *** mode/#UPHPU [+v pelaofeliz] by ChanServ |
| 01:01.43 | *** join/#uphpu sheri (~sheri@user-12hcvj4.cable.mindspring.com) |
| 01:01.43 | *** mode/#UPHPU [+v sheri] by ChanServ |
| 01:31.24 | *** join/#uphpu fexer5 (~AFechser@c-71-195-236-46.hsd1.ut.comcast.net) |
| 02:09.53 | *** join/#uphpu josePHPagoda (~josephnex@71-209-4-237.bois.qwest.net) |
| 02:09.54 | *** mode/#UPHPU [+v josePHPagoda] by ChanServ |
| 02:43.27 | *** join/#uphpu fexer5 (~AFechser@c-71-195-236-46.hsd1.ut.comcast.net) |
| 03:09.46 | *** part/#uphpu josePHPagoda (~josephnex@71-209-4-237.bois.qwest.net) |
| 03:20.00 | *** join/#uphpu macnewbold (~macnewbol@c-67-172-228-255.hsd1.ut.comcast.net) |
| 03:20.00 | *** mode/#UPHPU [+o macnewbold] by ChanServ |
| 03:41.52 | *** join/#uphpu wps (~wps@208.53.57.58) |
| 03:41.52 | *** mode/#UPHPU [+o wps] by ChanServ |
| 04:04.20 | *** join/#uphpu josePHPagoda (~josephnex@71-209-4-237.bois.qwest.net) |
| 04:04.20 | *** mode/#UPHPU [+v josePHPagoda] by ChanServ |
| 04:22.22 | *** join/#uphpu captbrogers (~brian@c-174-52-35-64.hsd1.ut.comcast.net) |
| 04:43.46 | *** part/#uphpu fexer5 (~AFechser@c-71-195-236-46.hsd1.ut.comcast.net) |
| 06:30.09 | *** join/#uphpu carmony (~carmony@c-76-23-26-107.hsd1.ut.comcast.net) |
| 06:30.09 | *** mode/#UPHPU [+o carmony] by ChanServ |
| 06:40.51 | *** join/#uphpu ninnypants2 (~ninnypant@69.169.155.132.provo.static.broadweavenetworks.net) |
| 06:44.05 | *** join/#uphpu ninnypants (~ninnypant@69.169.155.132.provo.static.broadweavenetworks.net) |
| 06:44.05 | *** mode/#UPHPU [+v ninnypants] by ChanServ |
| 06:45.11 | *** mode/#UPHPU [+v ninnypants2] by ChanServ |
| 06:45.36 | *** join/#uphpu ninnypants1 (~ninnypant@69.169.155.132.provo.static.broadweavenetworks.net) |
| 07:13.00 | *** join/#uphpu TuxToaster (~TuxToaste@c-24-10-187-146.hsd1.ut.comcast.net) |
| 07:13.00 | *** mode/#UPHPU [+v TuxToaster] by ChanServ |
| 11:03.13 | *** join/#uphpu mgeary (~mgeary@66.233.220.188) |
| 11:03.13 | *** mode/#UPHPU [+v mgeary] by ChanServ |
| 11:38.13 | *** join/#uphpu utahcon (~utahcon@li51-147.members.linode.com) |
| 11:38.59 | *** join/#uphpu romanovic (~romanovic@puritynine.com) |
| 11:38.59 | *** mode/#UPHPU [+v romanovic] by ChanServ |
| 12:08.24 | *** join/#uphpu mgeary (~mgeary@66.233.220.188) |
| 12:08.24 | *** mode/#UPHPU [+v mgeary] by ChanServ |
| 12:50.40 | *** join/#uphpu cro (~Adium@204-228-149-217.ip.xmission.com) |
| 13:15.33 | *** join/#uphpu eggyknap (~jtolley@unaffiliated/eggyknap) |
| 13:15.33 | *** mode/#UPHPU [+v eggyknap] by ChanServ |
| 13:53.33 | *** join/#uphpu tPl0ch (~profipimp@p5098d29d.dip0.t-ipconnect.de) |
| 13:57.37 | tPl0ch | I am not even sure if I am posting this to the correct group (since I am far, far ,far away from Utah) but nobody else can actually help me with my SOAP problem, and your group was the only one which was popping up in google several times when searching for soap, php and irc. |
| 13:58.01 | tPl0ch | PHP SOAP's 'typemap' option is very helpful when automagically creating custom objects from certain complex types mapped in the typemap array. Everything works fine with the from_xml callback. But when using the custom object in another method call, how do I get the SoapClient to use the 'to_xml' callback to produce the custom xml? |
| 14:04.36 | *** join/#uphpu TuxToaster (~TuxToaste@c-24-10-187-146.hsd1.ut.comcast.net) |
| 14:04.36 | *** mode/#UPHPU [+v TuxToaster] by ChanServ |
| 14:12.42 | *** part/#uphpu tPl0ch (~profipimp@p5098d29d.dip0.t-ipconnect.de) |
| 14:35.40 | *** join/#uphpu TuxToaster (~TuxToaste@c-24-10-187-146.hsd1.ut.comcast.net) |
| 14:35.40 | *** mode/#UPHPU [+v TuxToaster] by ChanServ |
| 15:04.15 | *** join/#uphpu captbrogers (~brian@128.187.198.80) |
| 15:09.58 | *** join/#uphpu pelaofeliz (~pelaofeli@67.137.236.66) |
| 15:09.58 | *** mode/#UPHPU [+v pelaofeliz] by ChanServ |
| 15:15.10 | *** join/#uphpu sheri (~sheri@user-12hcvj4.cable.mindspring.com) |
| 15:15.11 | *** mode/#UPHPU [+v sheri] by ChanServ |
| 15:15.26 | *** join/#uphpu opapo (~quassel@205.118.116.101) |
| 15:28.55 | *** join/#uphpu eggyknap (~jtolley@remote.utah.gov) |
| 15:28.55 | *** join/#uphpu eggyknap (~jtolley@unaffiliated/eggyknap) |
| 15:28.55 | *** mode/#UPHPU [+v eggyknap] by ChanServ |
| 15:29.13 | *** join/#uphpu Monnok (~monnok@205.204.33.82) |
| 15:29.13 | *** mode/#UPHPU [+v Monnok] by ChanServ |
| 15:30.35 | *** join/#uphpu macnewbold (~macnewbol@76.8.223.101) |
| 15:30.35 | *** mode/#UPHPU [+o macnewbold] by ChanServ |
| 15:33.07 | *** join/#uphpu eggyknap_ (~jtolley@74-37-185-183.dsl1.dta.ut.frontiernet.net) |
| 15:36.05 | Bikerdan | 07tPl0ch01: I'm not sure I understand your question... Most people in the group don't show up until about now. So maybe someone will join us soon to help out. Maybe if you reworded your question I could help you more. But I'm not exactly sure what you're trying to do. |
| 15:37.12 | *** join/#uphpu josePHPagoda (~josephnex@24-116-177-210.cpe.cableone.net) |
| 15:37.12 | *** mode/#UPHPU [+v josePHPagoda] by ChanServ |
| 15:38.06 | *** join/#uphpu eggyknap (~jtolley@unaffiliated/eggyknap) |
| 15:38.06 | *** mode/#UPHPU [+v eggyknap] by ChanServ |
| 15:38.45 | *** join/#uphpu NoCoolName_Tom (~NoCoolNam@63.82.19.2) |
| 15:50.11 | *** join/#uphpu mahelious (~mahelious@ip65-46-59-10.z59-46-65.customer.algx.net) |
| 15:50.11 | *** mode/#UPHPU [+v mahelious] by ChanServ |
| 15:56.26 | *** join/#uphpu carmony (~carmony@c-76-23-26-107.hsd1.ut.comcast.net) |
| 15:56.26 | *** mode/#UPHPU [+o carmony] by ChanServ |
| 15:59.24 | *** join/#uphpu jtsnow (~jtsnow@75-169-84-216.slkc.qwest.net) |
| 15:59.24 | *** mode/#UPHPU [+v jtsnow] by ChanServ |
| 16:02.45 | carmony | gooooooooood morning |
| 16:03.07 | josePHPagoda | g'morning |
| 16:04.58 | *** join/#uphpu fungus (~olsonl@bromine.sosstaffing.com) |
| 16:04.58 | *** mode/#UPHPU [+o fungus] by ChanServ |
| 16:06.05 | clintberry | good morning to carmony |
| 16:13.36 | *** join/#uphpu TuxToaster (~TuxToaste@205.204.33.82) |
| 16:13.37 | *** mode/#UPHPU [+v TuxToaster] by ChanServ |
| 16:13.50 | captbrogers | Sometimes I love how tech-illiterate my family is. My dad has a Droid X that he dropped from the giraffe house at the zoo, after it happened he just went out and got a new one. I ask him if I can have it, "but it's broken". $32 later I have all the parts shipped to me and I'll have a like-new phone |
| 16:17.48 | mahelious | captbrogers: are the new "parts" a memory card and a battery? or a new screen and antennae? |
| 16:20.40 | *** join/#uphpu wps (~wps@wfw.apxalarm.com) |
| 16:20.40 | *** mode/#UPHPU [+o wps] by ChanServ |
| 16:20.56 | Monnok | my dad's the opposite, he knows how to fix everything it seems |
| 16:22.00 | Monnok | except his ubuntu 11.10, he went back to 10.04 cause he couldnt get Unity working right |
| 16:22.17 | Monnok | tho the rest of the family's like your captbrogers |
| 16:24.13 | Monnok | good news tho, i think i'll be attending the meeting this week. My wife is trying to make plans for her to do something that night |
| 16:28.00 | influx | Good mornings, y'all. |
| 16:28.13 | Monnok | mornin |
| 16:29.32 | influx | How do you do? |
| 16:30.24 | Monnok | Not too bad. How about yerself? |
| 16:31.31 | influx | Better, now that I've had almost a full night's sleep and some good food in my belly. |
| 16:34.07 | carmony | lol -- http://media-cdn.pinterest.com/upload/163818505165211279_qKlRhQgx_c.jpg |
| 16:35.33 | influx | :( |
| 16:39.30 | TuxToaster | $rlart |
| 16:39.31 | raifbot | drops a humongous exploding nuke on josePHPagoda. |
| 16:40.57 | *** join/#uphpu itimber (~Adium@74.51.216.34) |
| 16:40.57 | *** mode/#UPHPU [+v itimber] by ChanServ |
| 16:45.14 | josePHPagoda | that wasn't nice |
| 16:47.55 | captbrogers | Seriously, I'm nice and bring in a dozen assorted Krispy Kremes to work. Only one person takes one. |
| 16:49.57 | josePHPagoda | lol |
| 16:50.17 | clintberry | I guess you will have to eat all of them ;-) |
| 16:51.43 | josePHPagoda | i would |
| 16:51.51 | josePHPagoda | but i've already done enough to maintain my plump figure today |
| 17:06.32 | influx | captbrogers: Vegetable platter maybe? |
| 17:08.03 | *** join/#uphpu xtrementl (~xtrementl@neutroninteractive-xmission.xmission.com) |
| 17:08.03 | *** mode/#UPHPU [+v xtrementl] by ChanServ |
| 17:10.18 | Monnok | $chuck-fact |
| 17:10.18 | raifbot | There used to be a street named after Chuck Norris, but it was changed because nobody crosses Chuck Norris and lives. |
| 17:11.47 | josePHPagoda | lol |
| 17:12.01 | TuxToaster | lol |
| 17:12.28 | josePHPagoda | chuck-fact is probably the best command |
| 17:12.32 | TuxToaster | captbrogers: bring some over here |
| 17:12.33 | TuxToaster | seriously |
| 17:12.42 | TuxToaster | I'll eat a few. |
| 17:13.27 | TuxToaster | still wish they'd open another Krispy Kreme shop closer to SLC |
| 17:13.41 | TuxToaster | sure, you can pick them up at a few places now, but would be nice |
| 17:16.11 | captbrogers | Sorry Tux, I'm at BYU. Might be a long drive |
| 17:16.26 | TuxToaster | aww |
| 17:16.43 | captbrogers | Just fed some students who looked feral and about to turn on each other |
| 17:17.28 | captbrogers | So does everyone here have their own VPS somewhere? |
| 17:20.25 | macnewbold | ~lolstats |
| 17:20.25 | ibot | total count of lol on #uphpu: 3368. Top 3: TuxToaster -- 480 (14.3%), carmony -- 457 (13.6%), SunSparc -- 417 (12.4%) |
| 17:20.44 | TuxToaster | $lart macnewbold |
| 17:20.45 | raifbot | stamps macnewbold on the forehead with the official Troll marker. |
| 17:21.06 | SunSparc | Wow, TuxToaster is rockin thos lol's. |
| 17:21.49 | SunSparc | captbrogers: I saw you were asking about CakePHP last night. Did you get the answers you needed? |
| 17:23.02 | TuxToaster | SunSparc: for what it's worth, I just looked in my logs, and I've only said 'lol' twice in the last five days. ibot said I was at 478 on the 13th. :P |
| 17:23.30 | captbrogers | SunSparc: Not really, I have to admit the documentation for Cake confuses me a little |
| 17:23.41 | SunSparc | TuxToaster: :) |
| 17:24.01 | TuxToaster | although I apparently went up from 404 in November to 480 now. December must have been a happy month. |
| 17:24.19 | SunSparc | captbrogers: What about it is confusing? I know that it is not have as many example as it could. |
| 17:24.22 | captbrogers | I like CodeIgniter because it was extremely simple to pick up, but I am going to be using Cake at my current job and I want to play with it one my own |
| 17:24.48 | TuxToaster | too bad I can't hook into ibot's database, could make a graph of lol progression. |
| 17:24.54 | SunSparc | TuxToaster: A Merry Christmas indeed. :) |
| 17:25.01 | TuxToaster | because, you know, that would be a very productive use of time. :-) |
| 17:25.15 | SunSparc | TuxToaster: That would be sweet |
| 17:25.25 | captbrogers | SunSparc: Nothing really about the number of examples, I just felt like as I read through the examples it was assuming I already knew certain things that I didn't. It would be nice to have a simple, nearly line by line / step by step how-to |
| 17:25.40 | TuxToaster | captbrogers: Cake isn't bad. |
| 17:25.57 | *** join/#uphpu jtsnow (~jtsnow@199.16.150.186) |
| 17:25.57 | *** mode/#UPHPU [+v jtsnow] by ChanServ |
| 17:25.57 | TuxToaster | I'm not a fan of frameworks, but once you get used to it it's not horrible |
| 17:26.08 | TuxToaster | though I still prefer to write my views in straight HTML |
| 17:26.12 | SunSparc | captbrogers: I almost jumped on the CI bandwagon, but then a job I took made me lean toward Cake, and I have never looked back. |
| 17:26.37 | TuxToaster | I know some people that insist on using the helpers, i.e. $this->Html->input instead of just writing the code |
| 17:26.46 | captbrogers | I do think Cake has more to offer me and once I do get used to it I will love it, the learning curve is just steeper compared to others |
| 17:27.19 | SunSparc | TuxToaster: Yeah, those link building helper codes can be 10 times bigger than the acutally link. |
| 17:27.26 | TuxToaster | yeah |
| 17:27.27 | captbrogers | TuxToaster: I really dislike having to use a helper to write any HTML. I like to be able to write my markup, then inject PHP where and when needed |
| 17:27.36 | *** join/#uphpu Utah_Dave (~boucha@72-166-51-162.dia.static.qwest.net) |
| 17:27.36 | *** mode/#UPHPU [+o Utah_Dave] by ChanServ |
| 17:27.58 | SunSparc | captbrogers: I admit there is a learning curve to Cake, but the power they give me in being able to get work done quicker is nice. |
| 17:27.59 | TuxToaster | I'm working on a project where the views are all broken up into a dozens of files with elements broken out everywhere |
| 17:28.15 | TuxToaster | I really understand what he is trying to do with it, but to me it's premature optimization |
| 17:28.40 | SunSparc | captbrogers: Have you gone through the Blog Tutorial? http://book.cakephp.org/2.0/en/tutorials-and-examples/blog/blog.html |
| 17:28.58 | TuxToaster | I don't mind the fact that he has so many elements, since it does help for reusing stuff, but it seems overkill, and then on top of that is the fact that everything is written in helpers, makes it a nightmare to track down code |
| 17:29.19 | captbrogers | SunSparc: I don't doubt that it will be great once I learn it, I just like seeing a tutorial where someone walks through each step needed to build an application as if they are doing it for themselves then have to explain it as they go along. Doing that myself has really shown how many times I have just done something without thinking that could be crucial information to someone else |
| 17:30.14 | SunSparc | captbrogers: You should do the Blog tutorial |
| 17:30.56 | SunSparc | Best place to start with CakePHP. |
| 17:31.05 | SunSparc | It was written for exactly what you are talking about. |
| 17:31.57 | captbrogers | SunSparc: I did try to follow it for a while, but for some reason the information just isn't clicking with me. I may just have to toy around with it later today |
| 17:34.11 | SunSparc | captbrogers: It goes through the Cake way of thinking. Lay aside any other pardigms you have and just see who it works. |
| 17:36.41 | captbrogers | SunSparc: I will, thanks |
| 17:37.07 | SunSparc | np |
| 17:38.02 | SunSparc | I have been using Cake for projects for about 5 years and really enjoy it. Make sure you check out the #cakephp channel here on Freenode also. |
| 17:41.09 | *** join/#uphpu carmony (~carmony@c-76-23-26-107.hsd1.ut.comcast.net) |
| 17:41.09 | *** mode/#UPHPU [+o carmony] by ChanServ |
| 17:45.28 | *** join/#uphpu fexer5 (~AFechser@128.187.197.201) |
| 17:46.37 | Monnok | TuxToaster: i agree 100% with your opinion on that code, ive had to work with this programmer before too, and im still new to Cake |
| 17:46.52 | TuxToaster | :-) |
| 17:50.10 | macnewbold | TuxToaster: I know what you mean too :-D the developer in question was trying to advocate helpers and elements to me the other day, for something that involves some controller code and at least 4 different models. |
| 17:51.18 | TuxToaster | heh, yup, sounds about right |
| 17:51.58 | influx | sudo a_little_dance ; make a_little_love ; wget http://downtonight.com/ |
| 17:52.00 | TuxToaster | the code itself is pretty sound, just seems like there's a ton of things done to "optimize" it that are completely unnecessary |
| 17:52.06 | TuxToaster | LOL @ influx |
| 17:58.20 | captbrogers | I find it very odd and slightly disturbing that I just put together a 'coding mix' of music and most of it consists of music that was popular while I was in high school |
| 17:58.31 | *** join/#uphpu ninnypants (~ninnypant@69.169.155.132.provo.static.broadweavenetworks.net) |
| 17:58.32 | *** mode/#UPHPU [+v ninnypants] by ChanServ |
| 17:58.34 | TuxToaster | lol |
| 17:58.57 | captbrogers | I'm becomming one of "those guys" |
| 17:59.33 | TuxToaster | same here for one mood. Though what I've been coding to recently is instrumental stuff that I can just put on repeat and let it go |
| 17:59.40 | macnewbold | captbrogers: a lot of the older stuff is so much better than the new stuff... |
| 18:00.01 | Monnok | ever listen to music from the 90's and then realize that was 20 years ago and you are actually listening to 'oldies?' |
| 18:00.07 | TuxToaster | "have you seen the charts and the crap that they're playing" |
| 18:00.18 | TuxToaster | Monnok: shut up. lol |
| 18:00.30 | Monnok | hey, i didnt say im exempt |
| 18:00.46 | Monnok | Nirvana still is one of the best bands ever imho |
| 18:01.15 | captbrogers | Monnok: I was young in the 90's but I remember my brother listening to music and doing his homework while I would fall asleep (we shared a room) and a lot of that music is still in my collection |
| 18:04.49 | ninnypants | http://tinyurl.com/72o8z6j |
| 18:15.59 | TuxToaster | yup yup, really wish I had switched us to git at my last job |
| 18:16.28 | TuxToaster | we considered it, but ended up sticking with SVN because it was centralized |
| 18:16.46 | TuxToaster | and mostly because I think they didn't want to take the time to do it. :-) |
| 18:17.35 | TuxToaster | but would have been awesome to be able to track down commits like that, especially since some of the devs would commit every little line change and test on a sandbox server that pulled from SVN every minute, rather than using a local dev environment |
| 18:31.50 | Utah_Dave | Yeah, git is awesome. They could have all had their own branch to push to the sandbox server and test. |
| 18:34.52 | *** join/#uphpu itimber (~Adium@74.51.216.34) |
| 18:34.53 | *** mode/#UPHPU [+v itimber] by ChanServ |
| 18:37.23 | macnewbold | i still am not a fan of git, largely because the decentralized model doesn't seem to be a good fit for me on the projects i've been involved with. |
| 18:37.43 | macnewbold | though i do think it can be a good fit for community-driven open-source projects |
| 18:39.38 | TuxToaster | macnewbold: that's what I used to think. Now that I've had to use it on some projects though, I don't think it's really that different from SVN in the sense that you can still have a central / main repository and devs just make sure to push changes to that |
| 18:40.22 | macnewbold | yeah, that can work okay - the part I really dislike is that devs "commit" stuff all they want, but then find out later (when pushing/pulling) that their commit had conflicts |
| 18:40.27 | macnewbold | but the code is already "committed" |
| 18:40.42 | TuxToaster | yeah, it happens |
| 18:40.50 | macnewbold | and the fact that one user can have a different view of what is currently "committed" than another isn't good imho |
| 18:40.54 | TuxToaster | though the same happens in SVN with people who aren't careful :-) |
| 18:41.09 | macnewbold | TuxToaster: no, it doesn't - the code can't commit while there's a conflict that isn't resolved. |
| 18:41.18 | TuxToaster | true |
| 18:41.27 | macnewbold | to me, that makes a big difference |
| 18:41.47 | Bikerdan | I dislike the way it handles submodules. |
| 18:41.52 | macnewbold | git just seems to redefine "committed" to mean something different than what I think it means |
| 18:41.55 | TuxToaster | I meant that you still run into conflicts if you haven't updated before committing, etc. |
| 18:42.07 | macnewbold | right, you can get conflicts, |
| 18:42.12 | macnewbold | but they always happen _before_ there's a commit |
| 18:42.17 | TuxToaster | macnewbold: yeah, because you're committing, but not to the main repo |
| 18:42.22 | macnewbold | exactly |
| 18:42.24 | Bikerdan | It points to a commit instead of a branch... Which kinda makes sense but it makes it hard to find out which branch of a submodule you are using. |
| 18:42.45 | macnewbold | imho you can't really "commit" without it going to a main repo, to make sure that someone else didn't commit something conflicting before you did. |
| 18:42.48 | TuxToaster | seems like there could be better integration so that if you have a remote tied to a repo, it monitors the remote for changes and alerts you of conflicts up front |
| 18:42.50 | TuxToaster | that would be cool |
| 18:43.18 | macnewbold | "commit" to me means that it is now an official revision, viewable by everyone, and saved permanently to the official repository |
| 18:43.28 | macnewbold | but in git, that only happens after a push |
| 18:43.37 | TuxToaster | yup |
| 18:43.39 | Bikerdan | That IS what it means.... Only it means that just for your repo. |
| 18:43.42 | Bikerdan | :) |
| 18:43.43 | TuxToaster | I can see that |
| 18:44.04 | TuxToaster | I've gotten to really like the stash feature though |
| 18:44.27 | macnewbold | Bikerdan: right - i don't see the point of having my own _repo_ of something. To me, the repo is/should be a per project thing, not a per-developer thing. that's what working copies are for. |
| 18:44.29 | TuxToaster | can see that saving a ton of time if you're in the middle of something when someone comes running with a fire that you need to put out |
| 18:44.37 | macnewbold | TuxToaster: right, stash is one thing that i like |
| 18:44.47 | macnewbold | staging commits can be handy too |
| 18:45.08 | Bikerdan | @macnewbold: I think I agree with you by-the-way. |
| 18:45.17 | TuxToaster | macnewbold: yeah, that's why I think there should be a way for it to verify commits with the upstream if you've specified one |
| 18:45.18 | Bikerdan | I actually like the simplicity of CVS / SVN type systems |
| 18:45.24 | Utah_Dave | macnewbold: git bisect is awesome for finding when bugs were introduced. |
| 18:45.31 | Bikerdan | git just seems a lot more complicated than it needs to be. |
| 18:45.32 | macnewbold | yeah, if git handled that automatically, that's nice |
| 18:45.51 | TuxToaster | because the "repo" features of staging and stashing, or being able to compare and roll back changes locally is freaking awesome |
| 18:46.01 | macnewbold | Utah_Dave: yes, it is. you can do something like that with svn too (i.e. with svn blame), but there isn't one higher-level command for it yet. |
| 18:46.19 | TuxToaster | but seems like it'd be nice to do all of that without it being merged into the main repo, so it'd almost be a hybrid |
| 18:47.01 | macnewbold | yeah, if you want something like that, it can work nice to make your own branch, then git push/pull become equivalent more or less to the merges you do between your branch and trunck |
| 18:47.03 | macnewbold | trunk |
| 18:47.24 | Bikerdan | What is the difference between git blame and bisect? |
| 18:47.26 | romanovic | I was svn only for the longest time. Then at one job, it became a nightmare seeing other programmers commit code they wanted to share with each other |
| 18:47.43 | romanovic | Subteams working on new features will need to share code, but it doesn't belong in the central repo yet |
| 18:47.50 | romanovic | git makes sharing that code so much easier |
| 18:48.10 | TuxToaster | romanovic: exactly |
| 18:48.52 | Bikerdan | For that problem, we just had multiple branches. We would use a dev branch that would eventually get merged to a test branch, then beta, then production. |
| 18:49.07 | TuxToaster | Bikerdan: git blame only gives you the last commit, with a list of every line changed and by who and what line |
| 18:49.26 | Bikerdan | I'm not familiar with bisect. |
| 18:49.29 | Bikerdan | What does it do? |
| 18:49.34 | clintberry | My two cents: git branching and merging is WAY better than svn. And for large projects, I have found git is significantly faster as well |
| 18:49.35 | TuxToaster | where git bisect lets you successively go back through revisions of commits to figure out which commit caused the problem |
| 18:49.47 | Utah_Dave | You tell bisect when the last good working commit was |
| 18:49.49 | TuxToaster | more useful if multiple files are involved or multiple commits on one file |
| 18:50.28 | Utah_Dave | and then it checks out the code for a commit and you tell it if it works or not |
| 18:50.45 | clintberry | And I love the bit branching model that seems to becoming de facto: http://nvie.com/posts/a-successful-git-branching-model/ |
| 18:50.49 | Utah_Dave | and each time it narrows down to the commit that broke it. |
| 18:51.01 | captbrogers | Anyone near BYU? |
| 18:51.06 | captbrogers | Want to grab lunch? |
| 18:51.18 | TuxToaster | romanovic: yeah where I used to work *everything* was committed, because initially they had a dev in Colorado and the testing server here in SLC, so he'd change a line, commit it, wait 60 sec for an update to fire, then test it, lather rinse and repeat. |
| 18:51.29 | Bikerdan | I see... I was just looking in the progit documentation too. |
| 18:51.33 | Bikerdan | That's pretty awesome |
| 18:51.57 | *** join/#uphpu itimber (~Adium@74.51.216.34) |
| 18:51.57 | *** mode/#UPHPU [+v itimber] by ChanServ |
| 18:52.08 | stderr- | clintberry: I use git-flow extensively. |
| 18:52.32 | TuxToaster | yeah, being able to easily branch for new features without having to copy an entire repo and then merge to trunk is pretty nice |
| 18:52.34 | clintberry | stderr: do you love it? because I sure do. |
| 18:52.40 | Bikerdan | I think the biggest problem with get is not really a problem with git at all. It's usually the developer having a hard time shifting their view from a centralized model. |
| 18:52.52 | stderr- | clintberry: indeed I do. |
| 18:52.58 | Utah_Dave | I kind of had a hard time with git at first |
| 18:53.12 | Utah_Dave | but I just started with basic commands |
| 18:53.14 | clintberry | Utah_Dave: Me too. It was difficult to grasp for me at first |
| 18:53.30 | stderr- | Most people who scoff at git haven't given it a chance. |
| 18:53.41 | stderr- | they use it like SVN for a week then go "meh". |
| 18:54.03 | clintberry | I'm to the point now, where I use git-svn if I am forced to use svn, like at work :-) |
| 18:54.27 | stderr- | Another selling point is essentially outside of git itself. GitHub. |
| 18:55.05 | TuxToaster | wow, git-flow is freaking awesome looking |
| 18:55.12 | TuxToaster | nice way to keep things organized. |
| 18:55.31 | DexterTheDragon | github-flow is better http://scottchacon.com/2011/08/31/github-flow.html |
| 18:55.36 | captbrogers | Take that as a no? |
| 18:56.19 | TuxToaster | I agree with macnewbold that if you really need a central repo git probably isn't a great idea, but luckily most of my projects are just me or me and a few people. :-) |
| 18:56.20 | Utah_Dave | github is freaking amazing. |
| 18:56.29 | macnewbold | yeah, makes sense |
| 18:56.54 | Utah_Dave | You can have a central repo with git. |
| 18:56.56 | stderr- | Utah_Dave: followed! |
| 18:57.40 | Utah_Dave | stderr-: back at you! :) |
| 18:57.55 | TuxToaster | Utah_Dave: see above :-) |
| 18:57.57 | Utah_Dave | is warp_defender the game you mentioned you were working on? |
| 18:58.21 | TuxToaster | you can, Mac just pointed out some issues with commit conflicts and such |
| 18:58.45 | stderr- | Utah_Dave: yea |
| 18:59.19 | Utah_Dave | cool. I'll have to check it out |
| 19:00.19 | stderr- | a lot has been done but I've put a huge amount of work into architecting input handlers and states and such |
| 19:00.29 | Utah_Dave | TuxToaster: I think you can remedy that by just pulling from the repo first to see if there is a merge conflict |
| 19:00.31 | stderr- | so there's a lot of placeholder graphics and the gameplay isn't completely tied together |
| 19:01.22 | TuxToaster | yeah, ideally people would check before they merge, but unfortunately many don't :-) |
| 19:01.25 | Utah_Dave | stderr-: that's cool, though. I haven't done anything with Ruby except for the basic intro tutorials. I'm interested to see how a game is laid out. |
| 19:01.45 | Utah_Dave | TuxToaster: can't fix stupid. |
| 19:01.59 | clintberry | DexterTheDragon: Thanks for that link! |
| 19:02.32 | TuxToaster | lol |
| 19:02.33 | TuxToaster | true |
| 19:03.11 | Utah_Dave | :) |
| 19:03.16 | stderr- | Utah_Dave: here's a video of some gameplay from a couple days ago http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WDPxPQuobOc |
| 19:04.40 | Utah_Dave | stderr-: wow, that's really cool! Looks great |
| 19:11.01 | ninnypants | stderr-: that's cool |
| 19:11.17 | ninnypants | captbrogers: I would have but I got in to work late |
| 19:14.11 | stderr- | Utah_Dave: yea, once we get rid of the placeholder graphics for explosions, enemies, and rockets/mines, it'll look a lot better |
| 19:16.06 | stderr- | http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k0PaAo9Ksh0&feature=youtu.be latest build, with better heat seeking behavior, rocket blast radius, and a weird parallax bug I'm going to have to fix tonight. |
| 19:17.34 | TuxToaster | Monnok: you up for some pizza? Thinking about ordering some in |
| 19:17.54 | Monnok | Sure |
| 19:18.10 | Monnok | Otherwise its Chef Boyardee for me |
| 20:10.45 | *** join/#uphpu sheri (~sheri@rrcs-67-78-229-150.se.biz.rr.com) |
| 20:10.45 | *** mode/#UPHPU [+v sheri] by ChanServ |
| 20:20.01 | captbrogers | And that's where the chatroom died |
| 20:20.26 | josePHPagoda | chef boyardee |
| 20:20.29 | josePHPagoda | destroyer of conversations |
| 20:20.47 | captbrogers | harbringer of silence |
| 20:23.05 | *** join/#uphpu beandog (~sdibb@173-165-130-129-utah.hfc.comcastbusiness.net) |
| 20:23.05 | *** join/#uphpu beandog (~sdibb@gentoo/developer/beandog) |
| 20:23.05 | *** mode/#UPHPU [+v beandog] by ChanServ |
| 20:24.09 | beandog | mindjuju: I need a video |
| 20:24.36 | captbrogers | http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gysLH0sCm3c |
| 20:24.59 | beandog | what. |
| 20:25.11 | beandog | not that one. |
| 20:25.24 | captbrogers | Sorry, first one to come to mind |
| 20:25.39 | beandog | boy I'm never doing that again. |
| 20:28.28 | ninnypants | beandog: here's a better one http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/01/17/obama-betty-white-birth-certificate_n_1210544.html |
| 20:29.29 | *** join/#uphpu josephscott (~josephsco@104.2.233.72.static.reverse.ltdomains.com) |
| 20:29.30 | *** mode/#UPHPU [+o josephscott] by ChanServ |
| 20:40.07 | captbrogers | Sometimes the internet can be a horrible and dark place |
| 20:52.54 | *** join/#uphpu ninnypants (~ninnypant@69.169.155.132.provo.static.broadweavenetworks.net) |
| 20:52.54 | *** mode/#UPHPU [+v ninnypants] by ChanServ |
| 20:56.15 | *** join/#uphpu josephscott (~josephsco@104.2.233.72.static.reverse.ltdomains.com) |
| 20:56.15 | *** mode/#UPHPU [+o josephscott] by ChanServ |
| 20:57.19 | captbrogers | So, moving on. Anyone done getting the latest tweet from a specific user without using cURL and XML? |
| 20:57.28 | captbrogers | Trying to do it with json but I'm getting 400 errors |
| 20:58.40 | Utah_Dave | I've just been tasked with finding my boss a short funny video or comic for his powerpoint presentation tomorrow. |
| 20:58.54 | Utah_Dave | topic is goals or production. Fun! |
| 21:00.22 | *** join/#uphpu josephscott (~josephsco@208.95.152.44) |
| 21:00.23 | *** mode/#UPHPU [+o josephscott] by ChanServ |
| 21:01.18 | TuxToaster | captbrogers: it's been a bit since I've played with it, let me see if I have any JSON tests though |
| 21:01.33 | TuxToaster | $rlart |
| 21:01.33 | raifbot | lowers josephscott's priority. |
| 21:01.58 | josephscott | $8ball will I get my priority back? |
| 21:01.59 | raifbot | josephscott - Reply hazy, try again. |
| 21:02.19 | TuxToaster | that's like the second time this week it's been lowered :P |
| 21:02.20 | josephscott | $8ball will I get my priority back? |
| 21:02.20 | raifbot | josephscott - As I see it, yes. |
| 21:02.32 | captbrogers | $chuck-fact |
| 21:02.32 | raifbot | "The only thing we have to fear is Chuck Norris himself." - Franklin D. Roosevelt |
| 21:02.35 | *** join/#uphpu carmony (~carmony@c-76-23-26-107.hsd1.ut.comcast.net) |
| 21:02.35 | *** mode/#UPHPU [+o carmony] by ChanServ |
| 21:02.37 | TuxToaster | LOL |
| 21:02.39 | TuxToaster | nice |
| 21:03.40 | TuxToaster | captbrogers: if you're getting a 400 error, I'm assuming you're trying to pull from a logged in user? |
| 21:04.04 | TuxToaster | or are you trying to pass a user to the public timeline? |
| 21:06.41 | *** join/#uphpu josephscott (~josephsco@104.2.233.72.static.reverse.ltdomains.com) |
| 21:06.42 | *** mode/#UPHPU [+o josephscott] by ChanServ |
| 21:06.56 | TuxToaster | oh wait scratch that, I forgot they don't allow you to filter the public timeline by user anymore |
| 21:07.47 | captbrogers | I'm trying the public timeline |
| 21:07.59 | captbrogers | that is what is in the api that twitter provides |
| 21:10.13 | TuxToaster | yeah I meant https://api.twitter.com/1/statuses/public_timeline.json vs user_timeline.json |
| 21:10.37 | *** join/#uphpu ninnypants1 (~ninnypant@69.169.155.132.provo.static.broadweavenetworks.net) |
| 21:10.40 | TuxToaster | I know I've got one that I had working |
| 21:12.05 | TuxToaster | https://api.twitter.com/1/statuses/user_timeline.json?screen_name=TuxToaster&count=1 <-- this works for getting the most recent tweet |
| 21:16.35 | captbrogers | .... |
| 21:16.42 | captbrogers | I was trying just that |
| 21:17.19 | captbrogers | Now I'm getting rate limit exceeded |
| 21:17.26 | TuxToaster | whoops |
| 21:17.30 | TuxToaster | you got throttled |
| 21:17.34 | captbrogers | For both yours and mine |
| 21:17.47 | captbrogers | I'm on a university campus, so that isn't that surprising |
| 21:18.05 | TuxToaster | yeah, they limit you to 150 requests per hour |
| 21:18.15 | TuxToaster | unless you're using Oauth then it's higher |
| 21:18.34 | captbrogers | 20 minutes in to the hour and it's hit |
| 21:18.53 | TuxToaster | actually according to their docs... the 400 might have been due to the rate limit |
| 21:19.06 | TuxToaster | "If your application is being rate-limited by the REST API it will receive HTTP 400 response codes." |
| 21:20.09 | TuxToaster | try this https://api.twitter.com/1/account/rate_limit_status.json |
| 21:20.20 | TuxToaster | it should tell you when you can use it again |
| 21:20.23 | captbrogers | That's really weird, I'm trying it from my server now and getting a 400 response in console |
| 21:26.33 | TuxToaster | $chuck-fact |
| 21:26.33 | raifbot | Death once had a near-Chuck Norris experience |
| 21:26.39 | TuxToaster | lol |
| 21:26.43 | macnewbold | hehe |
| 21:26.59 | *** join/#uphpu josephscott_ (~josephsco@104.2.233.72.static.reverse.ltdomains.com) |
| 21:27.00 | captbrogers | Tux, did I tell you my Chuck Norris stranded on an island joke? |
| 21:27.11 | TuxToaster | nope |
| 21:27.13 | macnewbold | you were stranded on an island with chuck norris? |
| 21:27.48 | captbrogers | Chuck Norris was once stranded on a deserted island with nothing but a pocket knife. The next day he emailed authorities asking them to deliver more pina coladas, he was out. |
| 21:27.57 | TuxToaster | lol |
| 21:30.05 | macnewbold | ~lolstats |
| 21:30.05 | ibot | total count of lol on #uphpu: 3372. Top 3: TuxToaster -- 484 (14.4%), carmony -- 457 (13.6%), SunSparc -- 417 (12.4%) |
| 21:30.09 | macnewbold | ~hehestats |
| 21:30.12 | macnewbold | ~hehstats |
| 21:30.12 | ibot | total count of heh on #uphpu: 1402. Top 3: beandog -- 450 (32.1%), SunSparc -- 230 (16.4%), mgeary -- 166 (11.8%) |
| 21:30.27 | TuxToaster | $8ball does macnewbold like using ~lolstats? |
| 21:30.28 | raifbot | TuxToaster - Signs point to yes. |
| 21:30.30 | macnewbold | ~hahastats |
| 21:30.34 | macnewbold | ~hastats |
| 21:30.36 | TuxToaster | ~macstats |
| 21:30.46 | captbrogers | haha |
| 21:30.49 | captbrogers | hehe |
| 21:30.50 | captbrogers | lol |
| 21:30.56 | macnewbold | ~lolstats captbrogers |
| 21:30.56 | ibot | captbrogers has said lol 1 times (0.0 %), ranked 61/103 (percentile: 59.2 %) |
| 21:31.11 | captbrogers | Whenever I see 'lol' I think of someone drowning in water and they are throwing their arms up to get my attention. |
| 21:31.30 | SunSparc | lol |
| 21:31.31 | mgeary | oh great |
| 21:31.32 | captbrogers | ~lolstats macnewbold |
| 21:31.32 | ibot | macnewbold has said lol 0 times (0.0 %) |
| 21:31.41 | josePHPagoda | SunSparc wasn't laughing, he was drowning |
| 21:31.45 | carmony | say it macnewbold! |
| 21:31.56 | captbrogers | What has been seen cannot be unseen... |
| 21:31.57 | josePHPagoda | macnewbold heats |
| 21:32.00 | josePHPagoda | err |
| 21:32.03 | josePHPagoda | cheats |
| 21:32.33 | macnewbold | I don't lol - i rotflol or rotflmbo |
| 21:32.50 | macnewbold | and sometimes I heat - like when we were grilling the other night |
| 21:32.56 | josePHPagoda | ~lolstats macnewbold |
| 21:32.56 | ibot | macnewbold has said lol 0 times (0.0 %) |
| 21:33.01 | josePHPagoda | but... he just said lol |
| 21:33.03 | macnewbold | mwahaha |
| 21:33.05 | macnewbold | I didn't lol |
| 21:33.08 | josePHPagoda | you did it again |
| 21:33.12 | macnewbold | ~mindtrick josePHPagoda |
| 21:33.22 | macnewbold | ~jedi josePHPagoda |
| 21:33.23 | ibot | ACTION zaps josePHPagoda with her Jedi powers |
| 21:33.26 | macnewbold | ? |
| 21:34.00 | josePHPagoda | lol |
| 21:34.01 | ninnypants | $mindtrick macnewbold |
| 21:34.02 | raifbot | (jedi hand wave) macnewbold you don't need to see his identification. |
| 21:34.05 | josephscott_ | $mindtrick macnewbold |
| 21:34.05 | raifbot | (jedi hand wave) macnewbold you don't need to see his identification. |
| 21:34.19 | macnewbold | the nice thing is that it only counts lols that are at the beginning of the phrase, and i think perhaps alone, where lol is the entire message |
| 21:34.36 | macnewbold | so i can trololololololo all i want |
| 21:34.40 | macnewbold | and there's no lol in it |
| 21:36.40 | josePHPagoda | go for it TuxToaster |
| 21:36.47 | TuxToaster | and... I find it funny that the only time I've seen mgeary say anything today is to lament the impending lol discussion |
| 21:36.48 | josePHPagoda | we must put an end to the cheating by macnewbold |
| 21:37.04 | josephscott_ | $8ball will the lols ever end? |
| 21:37.04 | raifbot | josephscott_ - It is certain. |
| 21:37.12 | macnewbold | try this one: http://lmgtfy.com/?q=macnewbold+lol+site:rikers.org |
| 21:37.15 | TuxToaster | $8ball they will?!?!?! |
| 21:37.16 | raifbot | TuxToaster - Outlook good. |
| 21:37.20 | TuxToaster | doh |
| 21:37.25 | macnewbold | ~dohstats |
| 21:37.30 | TuxToaster | wow, apparently that chased mgeary off. |
| 21:37.34 | *** join/#uphpu mgeary (~mgeary@66.233.220.188) |
| 21:37.34 | *** mode/#UPHPU [+v mgeary] by ChanServ |
| 21:37.39 | mgeary | TuxToaster: huh? |
| 21:38.02 | TuxToaster | mgeary: eh, I just made that comment and you quit. Thought I had chased you off. :-) |
| 21:38.10 | mgeary | irc crashed |
| 21:38.23 | TuxToaster | probably from an lol overdose by macnewbold. |
| 21:39.13 | josePHPagoda | lol |
| 21:40.53 | josePHPagoda | :-( |
| 21:40.56 | josePHPagoda | sad day |
| 21:41.47 | TuxToaster | *boom* |
| 21:41.54 | josePHPagoda | dang |
| 21:41.58 | josePHPagoda | i was hoping for over 9000 |
| 21:42.00 | josePHPagoda | :-P |
| 21:42.03 | TuxToaster | that's one way to increase your lol count. |
| 21:42.17 | TuxToaster | just get 5k clones to do the work for you :-) |
| 21:42.50 | josePHPagoda | something like that |
| 21:43.59 | *** join/#uphpu ibot (~ibot@rikers.org) |
| 21:43.59 | *** topic/#UPHPU is Utah PHP Users Group | uphpu.org |
| 21:43.59 | *** mode/#UPHPU [+v ibot] by ChanServ |
| 21:46.57 | macnewbold | ibot: we weren't laughing at you, really - some people just can't control their lols |
| 21:47.20 | *** join/#uphpu pelaofeliz (~pelaofeli@67.137.236.66) |
| 21:47.33 | *** mode/#UPHPU [+v pelaofeliz] by ChanServ |
| 21:47.50 | *** join/#uphpu Monnok (~monnok@205.204.33.82) |
| 21:47.50 | *** mode/#UPHPU [+v Monnok] by ChanServ |
| 21:59.02 | beandog | http://www.lesspopmorefizz.com/img/Bees.gif |
| 21:59.05 | beandog | this never gets old. |
| 22:05.47 | fungus | beandog, that's blasphemy. |
| 22:05.54 | beandog | lol |
| 22:06.01 | beandog | ~comfort fungus |
| 22:06.02 | ibot | There, there, fungus. It's OK. I'm here for you. |
| 22:06.03 | fungus | You can't dis the holy Oprah |
| 22:06.10 | beandog | The Hoprah? |
| 22:06.27 | josePHPagoda | lol |
| 22:07.01 | fungus | You're anti-Oprah attitude is disrespectful of my religion. |
| 22:07.18 | beandog | ibot: fungus is also a disciple of Hoprah |
| 22:07.18 | ibot | beandog: okay |
| 22:08.58 | ninnypants | ~fungus |
| 22:08.58 | ibot | extra, extra, read all about it, fungus is Kinda smelly, but grows on you, or a ASCII guru, or an Okra fan, or the new hawtness, or a hip, or gaga for Gaga, or a disciple of Hoprah |
| 22:10.06 | beandog | he's a halfway hippie |
| 22:10.08 | beandog | so, just a hip |
| 22:10.31 | fungus | Yeah, the VW is too much for me. |
| 22:16.14 | beandog | you'd be a good fit |
| 22:16.33 | influx | ~lart patty |
| 22:16.33 | ibot | whips out a shotgun, trudges over to patty, and goes postal |
| 22:16.43 | influx | Hmm. That's overkill, ibot. |
| 22:19.11 | TuxToaster | lol |
| 22:20.44 | mahelious | rule xx: there is no overkill, only "open fire" and "time to reload" |
| 22:21.24 | mahelious | s/xx/37 |
| 22:25.12 | influx | This QA person is just incredibly condescending. |
| 22:27.11 | beandog | citation needed |
| 22:28.23 | influx | Would that I could, but contact with her is generally over the phone. |
| 22:28.56 | ninnypants | If only influx's desk were a time desk |
| 22:29.18 | beandog | time goes in, work comes out |
| 22:29.28 | beandog | can't explain that |
| 22:31.13 | ninnypants | heh nice beandog |
| 22:31.17 | captbrogers | A "programmer" is a magical person that can transform caffeine into code |
| 22:31.27 | ninnypants | couldn't find the time desk reference but found this one http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2Vy_wqPHxTI&feature=endscreen&NR=1 |
| 22:31.28 | josePHPagoda | lol |
| 22:31.51 | influx | beandog: lol |
| 22:32.18 | influx | captbrogers: We're alchemists? |
| 22:32.54 | beandog | what about sysadmins? |
| 22:33.03 | captbrogers | Yes, but I cannot be transmuted. I lack the proper materials |
| 22:33.34 | mahelious | sysadmins turn bank accounts into large stacks of silicon and plenty of attitude |
| 22:33.43 | beandog | lol |
| 22:33.52 | beandog | I'm putting that on my business card. |
| 22:33.54 | captbrogers | I have a caffeine deficiency |
| 22:33.59 | TuxToaster | haha |
| 22:34.06 | influx | heh |
| 22:34.12 | TuxToaster | oh wait, I mean heh-- no, can't use that one either |
| 22:34.32 | TuxToaster | :-) |
| 22:34.57 | Monnok | TuxToaster: you could go bi-lingual and use "jaja" |
| 22:35.12 | influx | ^ |
| 22:35.13 | TuxToaster | have a feeling he'd change his nick after a bit though, the alerting would get annoying |
| 22:35.19 | TuxToaster | jaja very good ja |
| 22:35.23 | influx | That or you'd get kicked. |
| 22:35.25 | beandog | ~jajastats |
| 22:35.27 | influx | he'd* |
| 22:35.30 | TuxToaster | or that |
| 22:35.36 | influx | I would love to see ~jajastats work |
| 22:35.36 | TuxToaster | depending on the day, possibly literally |
| 22:35.48 | mahelious | it was registered, turns out |
| 22:35.51 | macnewbold | ~lart TuxToaster |
| 22:35.51 | ibot | offers TuxToaster some herring |
| 22:35.59 | macnewbold | ~confuse Monnok |
| 22:36.00 | ibot | yes how was my bacon today ? |
| 22:36.03 | TuxToaster | <homer>mmm... herring.</homer> |
| 22:40.15 | *** join/#uphpu Utah_Dave (~boucha@72-166-51-162.dia.static.qwest.net) |
| 22:40.16 | *** mode/#UPHPU [+o Utah_Dave] by ChanServ |
| 22:51.02 | influx | ~jajastats |
| 22:51.07 | influx | jaja |
| 22:51.12 | influx | :( |
| 22:51.16 | Monnok | ~jaja stats |
| 22:51.18 | beandog | jaja |
| 22:59.27 | *** join/#uphpu mindjuju (~mindjuju@173-10-26-193-BusName-utah.ut.hfc.comcastbusiness.net) |
| 22:59.27 | *** mode/#UPHPU [+o mindjuju] by ChanServ |
| 23:17.32 | TuxToaster | $chuck-fact |
| 23:17.32 | raifbot | Chuck Norris can fit a square peg in a round hole |
| 23:17.52 | beandog | we need a chuck norris version of disneyland |
| 23:18.31 | ninnypants | beandog: no one would survive |
| 23:22.11 | beandog | oh I, I will survive |
| 23:24.39 | beandog | ~diana |
| 23:26.50 | josePHPagoda | beandog: first you must be petrified |
| 23:27.17 | beandog | like, made of stone? |
| 23:28.27 | josePHPagoda | well... at first you were afraid, you were petrified? |
| 23:32.02 | mahelious | 50 lines...to load two files. the second file's contents replaces a artifact string in the first file. |
| 23:32.15 | mahelious | the artifact string is the only thing in the first file... |
| 23:32.23 | fungus | http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IVseBfMq_Dc |
| 23:34.02 | *** join/#uphpu wps (~wps@wfw.vivint.com) |
| 23:34.02 | *** mode/#UPHPU [+o wps] by ChanServ |
| 23:52.45 | *** join/#uphpu TuxToaster (~TuxToaste@205.204.33.82) |
| 23:52.45 | *** mode/#UPHPU [+v TuxToaster] by ChanServ |
