| 00:02.12 | mindjuju | heya gents |
| 00:02.25 | mindjuju | is the abbrv ecomm or ecom or eComm or ??? |
| 00:03.05 | bradym | beandog: i'm pretty sure it does |
| 00:09.27 | timinator | dunno mindjuju |
| 00:10.39 | *** join/#uphpu cycokilr (n=cycokilr@216.112.116.6.ptr.us.xo.net) |
| 00:11.33 | bradym | ugh.. why does the mysql migration toolkit insist on loading evertyhing about the entire oracle schema? i just want to import one table! |
| 00:17.21 | bradym | ~tunafart mysql migration toolkit |
| 00:17.22 | jbot | ACTION eats a week-old tuna sandwich with relish and walks over to mysql migration toolkit, leg raised, to let 'em rip. |
| 00:17.30 | olds | ok time to head home |
| 00:20.50 | timinator | same.... later guys |
| 00:29.42 | *** part/#uphpu mgeary (n=mgeary@166.70.44.49) |
| 00:46.01 | *** topic/#UPHPU by mindjuju -> Meeting Thursday @7p : PHP and Ecomm using Authorize.net | Utah PHP Users | uphpu.org |
| 00:50.07 | wps | is there a way to get the opposite of strstr() without using two functions? |
| 00:50.21 | wps | meaning, is there one function that will give you from the start of a string until needle? |
| 00:53.27 | *** join/#uphpu burnin (n=burnin@204-228-142-194.ip.xmission.com) |
| 00:53.27 | *** mode/#UPHPU [+v burnin] by ChanServ |
| 02:44.52 | mindjuju | ~chuckfact |
| 02:44.53 | jbot | When the Boogeyman goes to sleep every night, he checks his closet for Chuck Norris |
| 02:45.55 | *** join/#uphpu wps (n=wps@208.53.47.251) |
| 02:45.55 | *** mode/#UPHPU [+o wps] by ChanServ |
| 03:37.01 | *** join/#uphpu mgeary (n=mgeary@72.8.120.115) |
| 03:37.01 | *** mode/#UPHPU [+v mgeary] by ChanServ |
| 03:44.39 | *** part/#uphpu mgeary (n=mgeary@72.8.120.115) |
| 04:05.24 | *** part/#uphpu mindjuju (n=mindjuju@76.8.222.130) |
| 04:33.11 | *** join/#uphpu jsmith (n=jsmith@72.21.36.138) |
| 04:33.12 | *** mode/#UPHPU [+v jsmith] by ChanServ |
| 04:51.44 | herlo | jsmith: hey |
| 04:51.48 | herlo | I'm back |
| 05:12.58 | herlo | ~lart jsmith-away |
| 05:12.58 | jbot | whacks jsmith-away with a giant beaver's tail |
| 17:18.45 | *** join/#uphpu burnin (n=burnin@204-228-142-194.ip.xmission.com) |
| 17:18.45 | *** mode/#UPHPU [+v burnin] by ChanServ |
| 17:21.24 | *** join/#uphpu Utah_Dave (n=David_Bo@c-67-172-225-211.hsd1.ut.comcast.net) |
| 17:21.24 | *** mode/#UPHPU [+o Utah_Dave] by ChanServ |
| 19:43.53 | *** join/#uphpu jnbek (n=jnbek@72.8.114.148) |
| 20:22.35 | olds | wps: re the strstr thing.... no, you have to use at least two functions |
| 20:22.45 | wps | thanks |
| 20:22.55 | olds | I'm sure you figured that out though ;) |
| 20:23.00 | wps | yeah :) |
| 20:23.19 | wps | I have a function that has grown to a few functions and is getting complex |
| 20:23.26 | wps | I am wondering if it should be a class |
| 20:23.36 | olds | ahh, we have something similar at my work |
| 20:23.53 | wps | one of the functions instantiates a different class though |
| 20:24.03 | olds | we have to parse these emails for data and so we had to create some odd string functions |
| 20:24.16 | wps | so, if I grouped this all in a class, I would have a class being instantiated within a class |
| 20:24.23 | wps | is there anything to be concerned about doing that? |
| 20:24.27 | wps | is that a common practice? |
| 20:24.28 | olds | no |
| 20:24.31 | olds | yea |
| 20:24.52 | wps | k |
| 20:24.57 | wps | (classes are not my forte) |
| 20:25.04 | olds | ahh, I love 'em |
| 20:25.25 | olds | as long as you have a working autoloader, or you know that the class file has been included, then there's nothing to worry about |
| 20:25.36 | wps | k |
| 20:29.11 | wps | is it proper to use a class if you have no intentions of doing any extending or OOP… you are just looking to groups things together? |
| 20:29.24 | wps | (forgive me if I use some terminology incorrectly) |
| 20:29.27 | olds | good question |
| 20:29.30 | olds | so |
| 20:30.14 | *** join/#uphpu _psychic_ (n=_psychic@c-76-27-88-163.hsd1.ut.comcast.net) |
| 20:30.28 | olds | one advantage to doing so, is that if you're using the autoloader for php, you're not always including that file for those functions when it's not necessary since the autoloader can load the class when it's needed |
| 20:30.41 | *** mode/#UPHPU [+v _psychic_] by ChanServ |
| 20:30.53 | olds | on the other hand, you're just making a class with a bunch of static methods which sort of defeats the purpose |
| 20:31.30 | wps | and in that case, it might as well just be a file full of functions that you include |
| 20:31.41 | olds | if you use it everywhere, yes |
| 20:32.12 | olds | if you're using the functions right and left, then yea, no point in separating them into a class |
| 20:32.21 | wps | welcome, str_pad('psychic', 9, '_', STR_PAD_BOTH); |
| 20:32.32 | olds | lol |
| 20:32.45 | _psychic_ | :) |
| 20:43.46 | *** join/#uphpu beandog (n=sdibb@gentoo/developer/beandog) |
| 20:43.46 | *** mode/#UPHPU [+v beandog] by ChanServ |
| 21:51.26 | *** join/#uphpu _psychic_ (n=_psychic@c-76-27-88-163.hsd1.ut.comcast.net) |
| 21:51.26 | *** mode/#UPHPU [+v _psychic_] by ChanServ |
| 22:19.01 | *** join/#uphpu burnin (n=burnin@204-228-142-194.ip.xmission.com) |
| 22:19.01 | *** mode/#UPHPU [+v burnin] by ChanServ |
| 23:26.08 | *** join/#uphpu beandog (n=sdibb@gentoo/developer/beandog) |
| 23:26.08 | *** mode/#UPHPU [+v beandog] by ChanServ |
| 23:39.00 | *** join/#uphpu burnin (n=burnin@204-228-142-194.ip.xmission.com) |
| 23:39.00 | *** mode/#UPHPU [+v burnin] by ChanServ |