| 00:05.08 | wps | new site's up: http://uphpu.org |
| 00:05.29 | wps | I think everything is working but if you have a minute to click around it'd be appreciated |
| 00:07.03 | mindjuju | looks awesome! |
| 00:07.12 | wps | thanks |
| 00:07.37 | wps | so glad to see that other these gone |
| 00:07.54 | influx^^ | :o |
| 00:08.19 | influx^^ | Low contrast taking a minute to get used to. |
| 00:08.27 | influx^^ | But I likes. |
| 00:11.51 | *** join/#uphpu cycokilr (n=cycokilr@216.112.116.2.ptr.us.xo.net) |
| 00:14.46 | influx^^ | w/ 5 |
| 00:14.54 | influx^^ | Kind of reminds me of design observer. |
| 00:15.57 | wps | hmm… hadn't thought of DO, but yes, similar structure |
| 00:16.02 | wps | DO is a great site |
| 00:16.06 | wps | with good content |
| 00:16.33 | influx^^ | Indeed. |
| 00:31.24 | orsonj | looks pretty good, but a link for a higher contrast version might be nice. (but then possibly not, given the usual demographics of web designers) |
| 00:32.02 | influx^^ | developers don't need high-contrast sites. |
| 00:32.05 | influx^^ | ! |
| 00:35.10 | mindjuju | darn, it seems to have burned itself out |
| 00:38.43 | orsonj | ~lart people who set their monitors to super contrast enhance |
| 00:38.43 | jbot | readies the nuke launcher and fires some rounds at people who set their monitors to super contrast enhance |
| 00:38.56 | wps | mine is default out of the box :) |
| 00:39.48 | orsonj | I can actually read it fine, but I am 25. |
| 00:40.26 | wps | don't hesitate with the feedback |
| 00:40.44 | wps | I just finished this an hour ago so I didn't have any time for testing |
| 00:40.57 | wps | I won't be able to please everyone, but I appreciate any feedback |
| 00:41.35 | orsonj | well, a link in the top right corner that says high contrast is my feedback. |
| 00:45.30 | *** join/#uphpu nAmir (i=Aviv@gateway/tor/x-ff1fc1b0e578e03e) |
| 01:50.44 | mindjuju | anybody here ever dual boot xp and ubuntu? |
| 01:54.55 | Black_Chaos | I've done it before |
| 01:55.08 | mindjuju | hey, how goes it |
| 01:55.34 | Black_Chaos | whats up |
| 01:55.57 | mindjuju | was about the dual boot, was goign to ask if there was an advantage to having both OSs on the same HDD or should I split it out to 2 HDD? |
| 01:56.12 | mindjuju | I have 1 40g HDD and 2 20g HDD |
| 01:56.39 | mindjuju | so, the partition if on 1 would be 20, or 20 if on 2 drives, so its 6s on the HDD size |
| 01:57.16 | Black_Chaos | I think its just a matter of preference |
| 01:57.24 | Black_Chaos | I've done it both was before |
| 01:58.06 | mindjuju | k, i think i'll use te 1 40 and split in half and go that way |
| 01:58.11 | Black_Chaos | but doing it on 2 different disks would mean you don't have to be partition them so it can be an easier setup |
| 01:58.42 | mindjuju | hmmm.... |
| 01:59.11 | Black_Chaos | but either way i don't see any performance differences |
| 01:59.18 | mindjuju | k |
| 01:59.30 | Black_Chaos | if your ok with partitioning just stick it all on the one disk |
| 02:01.26 | mindjuju | i think i'm going to just do a base install of XP, no sp2, no patches, then flip over and do ubuntu, then patch both |
| 02:01.36 | burnin | mindjuju, if you wanted you could use the two 20G drives and LVM to have a 40G ubuntu partition. |
| 02:01.36 | mindjuju | that way if i foob, i'm not out a lot of time |
| 02:02.01 | mindjuju | burning, that could be cool |
| 02:16.40 | burnin | its been awhile since I did a ubuntu install, I use fedora myself, but if you choose in the installer to do a custom partitioning of your drives then you can create the LVM partition from the two 20G drives and install ubuntu across the drives. |
| 04:08.25 | *** join/#uphpu nAmir (i=Aviv@gateway/tor/x-9c1ab48f9e1a45b8) |
| 05:23.21 | *** join/#uphpu Black_Ch1os (n=admin@63-228-200-243.slkc.qwest.net) |
| 06:36.39 | *** join/#uphpu undertak1ngyou (n=will@71-219-84-28.slkc.qwest.net) |
| 07:28.42 | *** join/#uphpu undertak2ngyou (n=will@71-219-84-28.slkc.qwest.net) |
| 08:51.04 | herlo | mindjuju: I figured out the streaming server stuff last night. Ubuntu-Utah stream went off without a hitch |
| 13:19.32 | *** join/#uphpu nAmir (i=Aviv@gateway/tor/x-b8a140011ff9fd18) |
| 18:18.42 | *** join/#uphpu burnin (n=burnin@204-228-142-194.ip.xmission.com) |
| 20:04.13 | *** join/#uphpu nAmir (i=Aviv@gateway/tor/x-515852fd19b00ff9) |
| 20:15.21 | burnin | hmm, anyone know the w3.org url that can test a web pages compliance to standards? |
| 20:15.51 | burnin | nm, found it |
| 21:59.10 | *** join/#uphpu barfman106 (n=asssfd@68.178.8.212) |
| 21:59.34 | duranged | wow that is a cool name |
| 21:59.43 | duranged | how is everyone? |
| 22:40.15 | burnin | I'm experimenting with an idea for displaying message threads that doesn't require indentation, anyone care to view a prototype page and comment? http://burnin.chaogenus.org/basicblog |
| 22:44.56 | orsonj | so, the numbers indicate the comment replied to and the comment number |
| 22:45.22 | orsonj | I take |
| 22:45.24 | orsonj | it you |
| 22:45.26 | orsonj | are |
| 22:45.28 | orsonj | trying |
| 22:45.30 | orsonj | to avoid |
| 22:45.33 | orsonj | skinny |
| 22:45.36 | orsonj | posts |
| 22:45.38 | orsonj | like this |
| 22:45.42 | burnin | yes, but they are their more to explain the sequence |
| 22:45.54 | burnin | I wouldn't have the reference and message number in the final product. |
| 22:46.12 | burnin | and yes, I wanted to avoid the skinny posts caused by indentations. |
| 22:46.42 | burnin | does the branch method make any sense without explanation? in your opinion? |
| 22:47.43 | burnin | perhaps some type of reference back to a branch point would be good, there is an example of that in one of the branches. |
| 22:48.23 | burnin | I was thinking that by using color coding and breaks between branches that a visual indication of branching could be achieved without indentation. |
| 22:49.53 | orsonj | Interesting idea. It doesn't seem quite as intuitive, but could work. |
| 22:50.30 | burnin | k, thanks orsonj |
| 22:50.44 | burnin | I'm getting the same feedback in other channels, not easy to read. |
| 22:52.47 | orsonj | I wonder if there is a way to indent less stuff, but still have enough to provide context. |
| 22:54.04 | burnin | I was considering an indentation indicator without actually indenting the content. |
| 22:54.27 | burnin | but I was thinking it would still have limitations on how long a thread can be and it could still be hard to read. |
| 22:56.37 | burnin | just thought of something while chatting in another channel... |
| 22:56.40 | burnin | that gave me an idea. if I paginate then the indentation may not be an issue because the number of comments per page would also limit the possible indentation length. |
| 22:57.05 | burnin | just design it so indentations can't possibly become an issue. |
| 22:57.43 | burnin | then the question becomes, how readable is a paginated thread |
| 23:02.42 | duranged | IF ANYONE WANTS TO DO A SMALL SIDE PROJECT WITH THEIR PHP KNOWLEDGE PLEASE SEND AN EMAIL TO RYAN@WHITEGAUGES.NET PAY IS ALLWAYS VERY WELL.... |
| 23:05.01 | burnin | duranged, nice looking site |
| 23:12.21 | duranged | thanks! |
| 23:12.26 | orsonj | here is an idea (thunderbird style, but it could be easily adapted) |
| 23:12.43 | orsonj | http://tetratech.info/orson/threaded1.png (orig) http://tetratech.info/orson/threaded2.png (compact) |
| 23:14.33 | burnin | orsonj, compact yet still has some indentation. I'm going to toy with that a bit... |
| 23:35.00 | orsonj | Here is a more comples one |
| 23:35.13 | orsonj | http://tetratech.info/orson/threaded_b1.png (orig) http://tetratech.info/orson/threaded_b2.png (compact) |
| 23:35.43 | orsonj | complex that is |
| 23:36.43 | burnin | just about have a prototype made based on that idea, creating some link direction lines... |
| 23:37.35 | orsonj | perhaps I'll have to send those images into the mozilla people. |
| 23:51.46 | orsonj | Comment submited! |
