| 00:06.36 | *** join/#uphpu _psychic_ (n=_psychic@71.32.228.156) |
| 00:26.16 | *** join/#uphpu synic (n=synic@pdpc/supporter/student/synic) |
| 00:46.55 | *** join/#uphpu RyanE_ (n=ryan@rberick.dsl.xmission.com) |
| 01:52.50 | *** join/#uphpu wps (n=wps@65.73.113.162) |
| 01:52.50 | *** mode/#uphpu [+o wps] by ChanServ |
| 01:58.26 | *** join/#uphpu _psychic_ (n=_psychic@c-24-2-78-210.hsd1.ut.comcast.net) |
| 02:09.32 | *** join/#uphpu _psychic_ (n=_psychic@c-24-2-78-210.hsd1.ut.comcast.net) |
| 02:44.35 | *** join/#uphpu Utah_Dave (n=boucha@c-67-186-218-173.hsd1.ut.comcast.net) |
| 03:20.49 | bigdog_ut | evenin all |
| 03:21.12 | bigdog_ut | wps you around? |
| 03:42.43 | *** join/#uphpu RyanE (n=ryan@rberick.dsl.xmission.com) |
| 03:55.45 | *** join/#uphpu RyanE__ (n=ryan@rberick.dsl.xmission.com) |
| 13:06.43 | *** join/#uphpu RyanE (n=ryan@rberick.dsl.xmission.com) |
| 13:38.04 | *** join/#uphpu RyanE_ (n=ryan@rberick.dsl.xmission.com) |
| 14:15.51 | *** join/#uphpu wps (n=wps@64.72.210.10) |
| 14:15.51 | *** mode/#uphpu [+o wps] by ChanServ |
| 15:06.33 | *** join/#uphpu _psychic_ (n=_psychic@71.32.228.156) |
| 16:58.41 | *** join/#uphpu Utah_Dave (n=boucha@0-1pool148-105.nas31.salt-lake-city1.ut.us.da.qwest.net) |
| 17:12.52 | *** join/#uphpu fungus (n=fungus@2001:470:1f00:645:20a:95ff:fec5:636a) |
| 18:21.24 | *** join/#uphpu cycokilr (n=cycokilr@65-100-210-227.slkc.qwest.net) |
| 19:09.23 | mindjuju | yo |
| 19:09.45 | mindjuju | isn't it true that after a 2 table join, your query becomes increasingly inefficent? |
| 19:10.06 | mindjuju | like your joining 4,5,6 tables in one statement? |
| 19:10.33 | mindjuju | whoops, wrong chat window, but if anybody here knows the answer... |
| 19:13.13 | mindjuju | macnewbold |
| 19:40.56 | mindjuju | anybody around? |
| 20:16.06 | wps | no |
| 20:21.06 | macnewbold | ~wake mindjuju |
| 20:21.09 | jbot | mindjuju: GOOD MORNING!!! |
| 20:22.02 | macnewbold | mindjuju: if your database is in third normal form, and you still need a join, then don't worry, you're doing it as efficiently as you can |
| 20:22.16 | macnewbold | when you need a join of 6 tables, you need a join of six tables. |
| 20:22.24 | macnewbold | worry first about choosing the tables and columns well, |
| 20:22.30 | macnewbold | then optimize queries if necessary |