| 00:07.23 | mindjuju | is there an advantage to splitting a hard drive into 2 partitions from the RAID controller as compared to the OS level? |
| 00:07.53 | mindjuju | i would think RAID might perform better simply because it is one thing less that the CPU doesn't have to worry about (if managed by the OS) |
| 00:08.16 | macnewbold | right, that's the difference |
| 00:08.22 | macnewbold | hardware is faster than doing it in software |
| 00:08.34 | macnewbold | but hardware costs $, software doesn't |
| 00:08.40 | macnewbold | so if you've got the cash and need the performance |
| 00:08.43 | macnewbold | the hw is the way to go |
| 00:09.10 | mindjuju | well, the RAID controller is built in to the DL360 so it's an option setting |
| 00:09.18 | mindjuju | i'll set it up that way |
| 00:09.36 | mindjuju | thnx! |
| 00:09.48 | fungus | Setup the RAID at the hardware level, but split the partitions at the OS level. |
| 00:10.06 | fungus | One big raid, but the OS sees different partitions on it. |
| 00:10.24 | mindjuju | really? that's what i was wondering. why do it that way? |
| 00:10.27 | fungus | High performance from hardware, flexibility from software partitioning. |
| 00:11.06 | fungus | Hardware raid > software raid |
| 00:11.38 | fungus | Partitioning should be done later. Easier and more flexible management. |
| 00:12.13 | mindjuju | hmmm |
| 00:12.50 | mindjuju | that's initially the way i was going because of that flexibility then accidentally converted hdd from basic to dynamic in win2k3 |
| 00:12.51 | macnewbold | yes, that's the way to go |
| 00:12.54 | mindjuju | so have to reconfig |
| 00:13.14 | macnewbold | oh, and don't put anything from Microsoft on it, it degrades performance and can kill your uptime |
| 00:13.22 | fungus | lol |
| 00:13.31 | macnewbold | hehe |
| 00:13.32 | mindjuju | funny |
| 00:13.37 | mindjuju | :) |
| 01:34.20 | *** join/#uphpu herlo (n=csavage@12.176.97.34) |
| 01:40.16 | *** join/#uphpu wps (n=wps@65.73.113.162) |
| 01:40.17 | *** mode/#uphpu [+o wps] by ChanServ |
| 02:18.50 | mindjuju | dataw0lf, you back yet? |
| 02:30.03 | bigdog_ut | he is sleeping |
| 02:32.15 | mindjuju | bummer |
| 02:32.34 | mindjuju | bigdog_ut, have you done time on cisco pix firewalls? |
| 02:33.24 | bigdog_ut | nope |
| 02:33.57 | mindjuju | bummer, this pix i bought seems to be locked out all together, was trying to determine if i drop kick it, will it revert back to default settings |
| 02:34.06 | mindjuju | or poke some knob somewherez |
| 02:34.21 | bigdog_ut | no idea |
| 02:34.26 | bigdog_ut | i would drop kick it |
| 03:27.06 | *** part/#uphpu herlo (n=csavage@12.176.97.34) |
| 05:35.59 | *** join/#uphpu synic (n=synic@pdpc/supporter/student/synic) |
| 07:13.28 | *** join/#uphpu bigdog_ut (n=bigdog@207.135.132.13) |
| 07:13.28 | *** mode/#uphpu [+o bigdog_ut] by ChanServ |
| 07:20.10 | bigdog_ut | evenin all |
| 08:15.36 | *** join/#uphpu RyanE_ (n=ryan@rberick.dsl.xmission.com) |
| 10:33.49 | *** join/#uphpu RyanE (n=ryan@rberick.dsl.xmission.com) |
| 13:15.30 | *** join/#uphpu Utah_Dave (n=boucha@0-2pool130-217.nas28.salt-lake-city1.ut.us.da.qwest.net) |
| 13:23.51 | *** join/#uphpu _psychic_ (n=_psychic@c-24-2-78-210.hsd1.ut.comcast.net) |
| 14:43.48 | *** join/#uphpu RyanE_ (n=ryan@rberick.dsl.xmission.com) |
| 15:40.16 | *** join/#uphpu wps (n=wps@38.119.178.10) |
| 15:40.17 | *** mode/#uphpu [+o wps] by ChanServ |
| 16:13.42 | *** join/#uphpu synic (n=synic@pdpc/supporter/student/synic) |
| 17:06.21 | *** join/#uphpu _psychic_ (n=_psychic@128.187.177.151) |
| 17:31.21 | mindjuju | dataw0lf, you around? |
| 17:31.35 | dataw0lf | yar |
| 17:32.23 | mindjuju | hey quick question. on that 50e pix box i bought, i am having trouble accessing the PDM (i'm just barely getting around to deploying the box). I've tried through the web interface and through the serial / console port |
| 17:33.04 | mindjuju | i can see that the dhcp portion is running as computers downstream from the pix are being assigned an IP number of 192.168.1.2 and .3 |
| 17:33.22 | mindjuju | so seems like things are working, is there a way to reset to factory default without the pdm? |
| 17:33.43 | mindjuju | like pry open the box and jump some jumpers? |
| 17:34.01 | mindjuju | wasn't able to find anything on google for it, but thought you might know |
| 17:35.02 | dataw0lf | no idea. |
| 17:35.23 | mindjuju | bummer, |
| 17:40.37 | *** join/#uphpu herlo (n=csavage@198.252.209.247) |
| 18:06.32 | *** join/#uphpu fungus (n=fungus@firebat.aros.net) |
| 18:59.09 | *** join/#uphpu Piadas (n=ryan@rberick.dsl.xmission.com) |
| 20:00.15 | *** join/#uphpu RyanE_ (n=ryan@rberick.dsl.xmission.com) |
| 20:43.02 | *** join/#uphpu synic (n=synic@pdpc/supporter/student/synic) |
| 20:43.53 | *** join/#uphpu synic (n=synic@pdpc/supporter/student/synic) |
| 21:01.29 | *** part/#uphpu Utah_Dave (n=boucha@0-2pool130-217.nas28.salt-lake-city1.ut.us.da.qwest.net) |
| 22:18.51 | *** part/#uphpu herlo (n=csavage@198.252.209.247) |
| 22:41.08 | *** join/#uphpu diskotec|w (n=UN@12.125.156.114) |
| 22:51.27 | *** join/#uphpu herlo (n=csavage@12.176.97.34) |
| 23:53.25 | *** join/#uphpu wps (n=wps@38.119.178.10) |
| 23:53.25 | *** mode/#uphpu [+o wps] by ChanServ |