| 11:18.31 | *** join/#stepcode infobot (ibot@rikers.org) |
| 11:18.31 | *** topic/#stepcode is STEPcode - data exchange with the technologies of ISO10303 || http://stepcode.org || LOG http://ibot.rikers.org/%23stepcode/ |
| 15:37.44 | *** join/#stepcode hoiji (671b082a@gateway/web/cgi-irc/kiwiirc.com/ip.103.27.8.42) |
| 16:18.24 | hoiji | mpictor: I am sorry, I was away for couple of days, going through your msgs now |
| 16:19.38 | hoiji | Yes I was using gcc 4.6.3 (Ubuntu 12.04 LTS) |
| 16:27.34 | hoiji | mpictor: thnx for the for the reference args to pointers commit |
| 16:28.25 | hoiji | I read your comment about creating a pull request. |
| 16:31.41 | hoiji | Actually I am a little hesitant to submit a pull request before having run my version of stepcode with step-g |
| 16:35.55 | hoiji | Last time I ran it got seg fault at https://github.com/stepcode/stepcode/blob/hj/thread-safety/src/clstepcore/Registry.inline.cc#L70 |
| 16:36.58 | hoiji | I suspect that I might not be because of the changes I did for thread safety. |
| 16:37.34 | hoiji | s/I might // this might |
| 16:40.12 | hoiji | hence I plan to run the current master branch version of stepcode with step-g, unless ofc somebody somebody else has done the same. |
| 16:41.22 | hoiji | starseeker: Did you find out why the semantics of asStr function were changed? |
| 18:26.20 | starseeker | hoiji: I saw the change, but haven't drilled into it yet |
| 18:26.30 | starseeker | mpictor: what was the rational for the asStr change? |