| 13:08.49 | *** join/#stepcode infobot (ibot@rikers.org) |
| 13:08.49 | *** topic/#stepcode is STEPcode - data exchange with the technologies of ISO10303 || http://stepcode.org || LOG http://ibot.rikers.org/%23stepcode/ |
| 13:10.19 | *** join/#stepcode hoiji (671b082c@gateway/web/cgi-irc/kiwiirc.com/ip.103.27.8.44) |
| 14:59.35 | *** join/#stepcode hoiji (671b082c@gateway/web/cgi-irc/kiwiirc.com/ip.103.27.8.44) |
| 15:11.48 | hoiji | Hi everyone, remember the EntList issue I had raised a couple of weeks back. (Refer to https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/scl-dev/IN-Xg05-vwk ). Since at that time I didn't had any solution I decided to skip making that class (and its subclasses) thread safe. |
| 15:12.41 | hoiji | However now, I have arrived at a point, at which I can no longer ignore the EntList class. |
| 15:15.05 | hoiji | I have come up with a solution which is based on the fact that in the current API of EntList their is no remove function |
| 15:17.56 | hoiji | Also the only type of insertion allowed is append |
| 15:20.54 | hoiji | Would it be ok to use the solution, given the fact that if in future a remove or an insert (in between 2 nodes) API is added, it could could lead to deadlocks and/or crashes |