| 00:07.22 | mpictor | starseeker: do you set CMAKE_*_OUTPUT_DIRECTORY, or do you depend on stepcode putting files in sc_build_dir/(lib|bin)? |
| 00:08.04 | mpictor | is thinking of not setting those vars whenever SC_IS_SUBBUILD is set |
| 00:09.36 | mpictor | if you depend on those, I could have another variable to skip them and leave SC_IS_SUBBUILD alone |
| 00:13.22 | *** join/#stepcode travis-ci (~travis-ci@ec2-184-73-147-38.compute-1.amazonaws.com) |
| 00:13.22 | travis-ci | [travis-ci] stepcode/stepcode#80 (master - a29124c : Mark): The build is still failing. |
| 00:13.22 | travis-ci | [travis-ci] Change view : https://github.com/stepcode/stepcode/compare/b51297af026d...a29124cf5fc0 |
| 00:13.22 | travis-ci | [travis-ci] Build details : http://travis-ci.org/stepcode/stepcode/builds/13184502 |
| 00:13.22 | *** part/#stepcode travis-ci (~travis-ci@ec2-184-73-147-38.compute-1.amazonaws.com) |
| 01:14.15 | starseeker | mpictor: um. BRL-CAD sets those, so we shouldn't need stepcode to do so - the key is for stepcode to not override them when it's acting as a subbuild |
| 01:15.24 | mpictor | yea, it checked if they were defined |
| 01:15.28 | mpictor | if not, it set them |
| 01:16.00 | mpictor | having them set causes problems for rob, apparently |
| 01:16.23 | mpictor | he can override them, but either way it causes problems for some other package he uses |
| 01:17.02 | mpictor | I made a change, and it shouldn't affect you. https://github.com/stepcode/stepcode/commit/5deb7f5762e0a98622e3a70fcd56cd77487bdc28 |
| 01:22.53 | starseeker | no problem |
| 01:23.35 | starseeker | a bit surprised stepcode setting them could mess with his build - are we sticking those values in the Cache? |
| 01:24.09 | starseeker | although if he's relying on target info maybe that isn't robust to different setting for those variables... never tested that before |
| 01:29.07 | mpictor | I'm not sure, just that he said on scl-dev that it screwed up some other subproject |
| 01:29.36 | mpictor | I hope we haven't hardcoded any executable paths! |
| 01:42.15 | starseeker | thinks it is more likely that his project was assuming exec-in-build-dir but it's hard to say - we don't test with dirnames other than bin and lib currently, iirc... |
| 01:42.39 | starseeker | if we did hardcode something that's fairly easy to fix |
| 01:42.48 | mpictor | yea |
| 01:43.23 | mpictor | and it isn't likely for such a problem to hide until a year from now |
| 01:44.15 | starseeker | must concede he hasn't tested stepcode as a stand-alone on Windows in a long time |
| 01:44.29 | starseeker | so hard to say what could be going on there... |
| 01:44.54 | starseeker | nasty platform to build on, so it doesn't get much TLC... |
| 01:45.04 | mpictor | yea |
| 01:45.30 | starseeker | crosses his fingers that the clang guys really do get a proper native clang put together... that would Rock |
| 01:45.37 | mpictor | you hear "developers! developers! developers!" from ballmer |
| 01:45.55 | mpictor | reality is a bit different, though :o |
| 01:46.24 | mpictor | yes native clang would be nice |
| 01:46.34 | starseeker | heh - when your file IO sucks bad enough that you have to give the user elaborate graphs of performance in the delete dialog, Something's Wrong |
| 01:46.53 | mpictor | have you ever tried crosscompiling with MXE or another way? |
| 01:46.55 | mpictor | lol yea |
| 01:47.11 | starseeker | no, just MSVC |
| 01:47.21 | mpictor | I build exppp for Keith Hunten with that. I was surprised how easy it was |
| 01:47.29 | starseeker | this seems to be the effort to watch: http://blog.llvm.org/2013/09/a-path-forward-for-llvm-toolchain-on.html |
| 01:48.29 | mpictor | I suppose elimination of dllimport/dllexport is too much to ask for |
| 01:48.43 | starseeker | heh |
| 01:49.05 | starseeker | apparently if you're not an open source project you might care about that... |
| 01:49.10 | mpictor | IIRC, it's an inescapable problem with COFF |
| 01:49.45 | starseeker | would *love* to see Visual Studio hop on the clang/llvm bandwagon, but I suppose the odds there involve snowballs and warm places... |
| 01:50.47 | mpictor | thinks snowballs and supernovae would be more realistic odds |
| 06:30.18 | *** join/#stepcode starseeker (~starseeke@66-118-151-70.static.sagonet.net) |
| 11:52.05 | *** join/#stepcode kesha (~kesha@14.139.122.114) |
| 15:54.45 | *** join/#stepcode mpictor (~mark@c-67-177-102-131.hsd1.in.comcast.net) |
| 16:18.46 | *** join/#stepcode mpictor (~mark@c-67-177-102-131.hsd1.in.comcast.net) |
| 16:26.19 | *** join/#stepcode mpictor (~mark@c-67-177-102-131.hsd1.in.comcast.net) |
| 17:53.30 | *** join/#stepcode mpictor (~mark@c-67-177-102-131.hsd1.in.comcast.net) |
| 20:10.00 | *** join/#stepcode travis-ci (~travis-ci@ec2-54-226-156-108.compute-1.amazonaws.com) |
| 20:10.01 | travis-ci | [travis-ci] stepcode/stepcode#82 (master - 6d4f085 : charliestirk): The build is still failing. |
| 20:10.01 | travis-ci | [travis-ci] Change view : https://github.com/stepcode/stepcode/compare/d1437c776105...6d4f0852d4b6 |
| 20:10.01 | travis-ci | [travis-ci] Build details : http://travis-ci.org/stepcode/stepcode/builds/13228072 |
| 20:10.01 | *** part/#stepcode travis-ci (~travis-ci@ec2-54-226-156-108.compute-1.amazonaws.com) |