| 00:00.26 | mpictor | yup |
| 00:00.34 | mpictor | I sent you an email |
| 00:00.37 | starseeker | is inching along - currently tring to split closed 3D curves to make it easier for importers |
| 00:01.01 | mpictor | you don't have to install the CA certificate; if you do, firefox will stop complaining about the server cert being untrusted |
| 00:01.22 | mpictor | in chrome, the CA cert has to be installed differently than the client cert |
| 00:02.39 | starseeker | how do I install the other one? |
| 00:02.56 | mpictor | hmmm |
| 00:03.07 | mpictor | chrome lets me view the site even without the ca cert |
| 00:03.08 | mpictor | one sec |
| 00:04.05 | mpictor | the ca cert gets imported on advanced -> encryption -> authorities |
| 00:04.15 | starseeker | it's asking me to enter the password used to encrypt the cert? |
| 00:04.20 | mpictor | just hit ok |
| 00:04.33 | starseeker | ah |
| 00:04.40 | mpictor | thinks I gave you the right one |
| 00:05.37 | starseeker | still saying Peer's certificate has an invalid signature. |
| 00:05.43 | mpictor | hmmm |
| 00:06.11 | mpictor | you installed the CA certificate as an authority? |
| 00:06.48 | mpictor | oh |
| 00:06.49 | starseeker | yeah |
| 00:07.01 | mpictor | check the box that says "trust this ca to identify websites" |
| 00:07.02 | starseeker | do I need to restart firefox? |
| 00:07.05 | starseeker | did |
| 00:07.13 | mpictor | I'm going to try in my firefox... |
| 00:08.41 | mpictor | crap |
| 00:08.52 | starseeker | yeah, no dice |
| 00:09.03 | mpictor | chrome requires the client cert in pkcs12 format, and the ca cert in der format |
| 00:09.14 | mpictor | wonder if firefox requires something different |
| 00:12.28 | mpictor | the guy who wrote golab had to jump through hoops to get it working on chrome |
| 00:17.19 | starseeker | bingo |
| 00:17.23 | starseeker | works in chromium |
| 00:18.00 | mpictor | cool! |
| 00:18.44 | *** join/#stepcode kesha__ (~kesha@49.249.0.218) |
| 00:19.06 | mpictor | navigation is a bit funny - click on a dir next to the folder icon to move around |
| 00:19.31 | starseeker | anything specific you wanted me to check? |
| 00:19.52 | mpictor | no, just thought I'd show you |
| 00:19.58 | starseeker | cool :-) |
| 00:20.02 | mpictor | might come in handy in the future :) |
| 00:20.05 | starseeker | indeed |
| 00:20.17 | starseeker | thanks again by the way for figuring out that "under type" thing |
| 00:20.22 | mpictor | no prob |
| 00:20.34 | mpictor | with golab, every instantly sees changes |
| 00:20.38 | mpictor | *everyone |
| 00:20.47 | starseeker | sweet |
| 00:20.54 | mpictor | but they aren't actually saved until someone hits ctrl-s |
| 00:21.11 | mpictor | if it was written in go, it would automatically be recompiled and all tests ran |
| 00:21.52 | starseeker | hehe - if you want to re-write BRL-CAD in Go, you'll have to duke it out with ``Erik in the Lisp corner ;-) |
| 00:21.58 | mpictor | lol |
| 00:22.08 | mpictor | I'm still trying to wrap my head around go |
| 00:22.19 | mpictor | it's *different* |
| 00:22.50 | starseeker | is that the one Google developed? |
| 00:22.56 | mpictor | yea |
| 00:23.10 | mpictor | supposed to be easy to parse and easy to generate |
| 00:23.15 | mpictor | and it compiles *fast* |
| 00:23.30 | starseeker | ah - another candidate for express output? |
| 00:24.09 | mpictor | go build <url> downloads the source and everything it depends on, from any git repo, and builds it |
| 00:24.19 | starseeker | which reminds me - is there any chance we could rename fedex_plus to something a tad more descriptive of its function? Like express2cxx or something? |
| 00:24.27 | mpictor | I've wondered about generating go from express, but that would be a lot of work |
| 00:24.37 | mpictor | heh I've been thinking about that |
| 00:24.58 | mpictor | I was thinking cpp4exp, py4exp |
| 00:24.58 | starseeker | feels like he needs to go to the post office or something looking at it... |
| 00:25.05 | mpictor | lol |
| 00:25.32 | mpictor | I want a name that requires few tabs for bash completion :D |
| 00:25.59 | starseeker | was thinking along the lines of ghostscript, with it's ps2pdf et. al. |
| 00:26.26 | mpictor | yea but then I need to hit tab more times to complete the name :'( |
| 00:26.50 | mpictor | exp2cxx would be more conventional |
| 00:26.59 | mpictor | (or express2cxx) |
| 00:27.15 | starseeker | brlcad's notion was to have one executable (express) that could output multiple languages based on a flag |
| 00:27.37 | mpictor | hmm |
| 00:28.00 | starseeker | not sure how practical that is technically (and it requries even more typing...) |
| 00:28.09 | mpictor | I think it would take a lot of work to merge fedex_plus and fedex_python |
| 00:28.24 | starseeker | kinda figured |
| 00:28.36 | mpictor | but yea, I want different names myself |
| 00:29.31 | mpictor | doubts fedex would sue, but EMC2 had to be renamed to LinuxCNC because of EMC corp's lawyers |
| 00:29.59 | mpictor | thinks NIST's EMC existed before EMC Corp |
| 00:30.05 | starseeker | personally I'd vote for the "conventional" approach just to be intuitive - easy tabbing is nice, but the instance anyone implements a C export and we get c4exp it's toast ;-) |
| 00:30.21 | mpictor | shhhhh |
| 00:30.59 | mpictor | ok, I'm going to call it a night |
| 00:31.22 | starseeker | mpictor: if I submit a renaming patch would it be OK, or did you want to take it up on the mailing list? |
| 00:31.55 | mpictor | I was about to create an issue for it, but it wouldn't hurt to discuss on the list |
| 00:32.29 | starseeker | runs the risk of being a bikeshed issue |
| 00:32.42 | mpictor | true |
| 00:32.59 | mpictor | go ahead and submit a patch/pull request |
| 00:33.10 | mpictor | anyone who watches the repo will become aware then |
| 00:33.22 | mpictor | everyone else probably doesn't care a lot |
| 00:33.24 | starseeker | awesome, thanks - we can always change it again later if someone thinks up something better |
| 00:33.34 | mpictor | no prob :) |
| 00:33.37 | starseeker | open source is good like that |
| 00:33.40 | mpictor | yea |
| 00:33.55 | starseeker | ok, I'll let you run - thanks again! |
| 00:33.55 | mpictor | night |
| 00:33.59 | mpictor | np |
| 01:16.01 | *** join/#stepcode kesha__ (~kesha@49.249.0.218) |
| 01:28.58 | brlcad | starseeker: note that mpictor's assertion about the scope wasn't right |
| 01:29.34 | brlcad | you moved the decls to the top of the most obvious scope, but there are preprocessor directives hiding other scopes that are in there too |
| 01:34.42 | brlcad | notes emacs has had that collaborative editing feature like golab for 20+ years |
| 01:41.39 | starseeker | brlcad: ah - should I have move them elsewhere? |
| 01:41.51 | starseeker | didn't think to look for preprocessor generated scopes |
| 01:47.47 | brlcad | LISTdo+LISTod |
| 01:48.02 | brlcad | they really should have curlies, so the internal scope was obvious |
| 02:03.19 | *** join/#stepcode kesha__ (~kesha@49.249.0.218) |
| 02:33.36 | *** join/#stepcode brlcad (~sean@66-118-151-70.static.sagonet.net) |
| 03:46.52 | *** join/#stepcode kimzzzz (~AndChat31@1.38.30.243) |
| 04:36.14 | *** join/#stepcode kesha (~kesha@14.139.122.114) |
| 04:59.01 | kesha | starseeker: Is this fine ?https://github.com/stepcode/stepcode/commit/3c66a0018a6480c07cd7eb000449754693030f44 |
| 08:18.35 | *** join/#stepcode kesha (~kesha@14.139.122.114) |
| 09:44.14 | *** join/#stepcode kesha (~kesha@14.139.122.114) |
| 11:29.56 | starseeker | kesha: that's find - it's the destination that needs to be relative |
| 11:30.01 | starseeker | s/find/fine |
| 11:30.06 | starseeker | ah, nuts |
| 11:36.13 | *** join/#stepcode kesha (~kesha@14.139.122.114) |
| 11:51.43 | starseeker | kesha: that's fine - it's the destination that needs to be relative |
| 11:56.23 | kesha | starseeker: okies |
| 12:00.08 | kesha | in the mail, were you talking abt https://github.com/stepcode/stepcode/commit/35fa4e18291de67d62ddba767c778ab277eddc5f ? |
| 12:01.00 | kesha | I have already rebased it |
| 14:38.51 | *** join/#stepcode kesha (~kesha@14.139.122.114) |
| 15:19.01 | *** join/#stepcode mpictor_ (~mpictor_@2600:1015:b111:f121:0:47:294:f801) |
| 15:24.02 | kesha | Morning mpictor_ ! |
| 15:24.19 | mpictor_ | Hi kesha |
| 15:24.32 | mpictor_ | How are things going? |
| 15:24.57 | kesha | Made the paths absolute. |
| 15:25.11 | mpictor_ | You mean relative? |
| 15:25.22 | kesha | oops ! yes. |
| 15:26.19 | mpictor_ | Cool! |
| 15:26.38 | mpictor_ | I'll take a look later today |
| 15:27.32 | kesha | okay. |
| 15:27.55 | kesha | Anything for me to do till then ? |
| 15:28.17 | kesha | I am absolutely free now |
| 16:51.50 | *** join/#stepcode mpictor_ (~mpictor_@2600:1015:b111:f121:0:47:294:f801) |
| 17:29.46 | *** join/#stepcode mpictor_ (~mpictor_@2600:1015:b111:f121:0:47:294:f801) |
| 17:55.50 | *** join/#stepcode kesha (~kesha@14.139.122.114) |
| 19:38.17 | *** join/#stepcode kesha (~kesha@14.139.122.114) |
| 20:17.34 | *** join/#stepcode mpictor (~mark@2601:d:b280:3d4:d63d:7eff:fe2d:2505) |
| 21:27.58 | mpictor | starseeker: if your only issue with kesha's pull request was the absolute paths, I think it's good now |
| 21:27.59 | mpictor | https://github.com/stepcode/stepcode/pull/254/files#L1R56 |
| 21:57.26 | starseeker | mpictor: I'll take a look later this evening... |
| 21:58.20 | mpictor | ok |
| 21:58.45 | starseeker | did my rename patch look OK? |
| 22:00.43 | mpictor | yea, it does. I was going to wait on kesha's, but on second thought they shouldn't conflict |
| 22:02.20 | mpictor | starseeker: merged |
| 22:16.56 | *** join/#stepcode travis-ci (~travis-ci@ec2-54-224-178-148.compute-1.amazonaws.com) |
| 22:16.56 | travis-ci | [travis-ci] stepcode/stepcode#39 (master - f0f5763 : Mark): The build is still failing. |
| 22:16.56 | travis-ci | [travis-ci] Change view : https://github.com/stepcode/stepcode/compare/76e2b2bcb258...f0f5763b9cb3 |
| 22:16.56 | travis-ci | [travis-ci] Build details : http://travis-ci.org/stepcode/stepcode/builds/10774187 |
| 22:16.56 | *** part/#stepcode travis-ci (~travis-ci@ec2-54-224-178-148.compute-1.amazonaws.com) |