| 00:09.42 | *** join/#qi-hardware Nik05 (~Nik05@unaffiliated/nik05) |
| 01:37.26 | *** join/#qi-hardware atommann (~atommann@210.3.149.230) |
| 03:11.02 | *** join/#qi-hardware atommann (~atommann@210.3.149.230) |
| 04:09.18 | *** join/#qi-hardware arossdotme (~zxy@79.69.192.69) |
| 05:33.14 | *** join/#qi-hardware atommann (~atommann@210.3.149.230) |
| 06:41.56 | *** join/#qi-hardware atommann (~atommann@210.3.149.230) |
| 08:41.55 | *** join/#qi-hardware xiangfu (~xiangfu@60.10.200.118) |
| 11:25.19 | *** join/#qi-hardware wolfspraul (~wolfsprau@x4d0c9e93.dyn.telefonica.de) |
| 13:40.41 | *** join/#qi-hardware viric_ (~viric@unaffiliated/viric) |
| 13:51.54 | *** join/#qi-hardware FDCX_ (~fdcx@ceata/consiliu/FDCX) |
| 15:12.04 | arossdotme | i have a rc battery charger. i have a old never used laptop battery li-ion 11.1V 6000mha. there is not li-ion 11.1v charge mode only for li-po. do i use li-po mode on a li-ion pack? or is the vottage on the pack missleading and i should use the li-on 10.4v or 14.somethingV mode to charge it? |
| 15:14.55 | arossdotme | also i see this laptop pack has a ti monitor chip but the sets of 3 cells that are in parrell. and each set is conencted in seriels is not monitored buy the ti monitor chip but by a seporate board. there is only 2 power wires going to the ouput/ ti monitor chip. so do i need to connect the cell sets to the balance input of the rc charger? as it looks like it has its only protection circuit. |
| 15:15.21 | arossdotme | only=own |
| 15:16.33 | arossdotme | so i belive i just connect the main 11.1v pwr wires to the charger and not the cell sets to the balance input/monitoring of the rc charger |
| 15:17.19 | arossdotme | buy=by |
| 15:17.35 | whitequark | there is no difference in chemistry between li-ion and li-po |
| 15:17.46 | arossdotme | oh |
| 15:18.01 | arossdotme | and li-on is the same as li-ion? |
| 15:18.15 | whitequark | there is no "li-on" batteries |
| 15:18.36 | arossdotme | so that is just my china chargers miss spelling :) |
| 15:19.00 | arossdotme | thought i didnt remmber being a li-on |
| 15:19.03 | arossdotme | thanks |
| 15:19.31 | arossdotme | but didnt li-ion and li-po have different end charge voltage |
| 15:19.57 | arossdotme | li-ion 4.1 vs 4.2li-po |
| 15:29.57 | arossdotme | btw thanks muchly whitequark |
| 15:31.32 | arossdotme | been a great help, i guess is there no diff in chemistry then there should not be a diff in volts. its just i thought iremmber there being ones withh a 0.1v lower max volt.....? |
| 15:31.41 | arossdotme | is=as |
| 15:31.59 | wpwrak | hmm ... chinese + li-on ... https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lion-Eating_Poet_in_the_Stone_Den |
| 16:21.32 | *** join/#qi-hardware jbalthet1o (~jbenedett@c-24-3-57-225.hsd1.pa.comcast.net) |
| 16:44.16 | *** join/#qi-hardware archang (~archang@111.198.29.53) |
| 16:46.51 | larsc | that does not sound healthy |
| 19:15.54 | *** join/#qi-hardware wolfspraul (~wolfsprau@x4d0c9e93.dyn.telefonica.de) |
| 22:07.05 | *** join/#qi-hardware wolfspraul (~wolfsprau@x4d0c9e93.dyn.telefonica.de) |