| 00:23.19 | *** join/#qi-hardware archang (~archang@122.133.52.113.static.ximdns.com) |
| 00:33.02 | *** join/#qi-hardware nicksydney (~quassel@213.100.dsl.syd.iprimus.net.au) |
| 00:37.53 | *** join/#qi-hardware nicksydney_ (~quassel@211.076.dsl.syd.iprimus.net.au) |
| 01:24.17 | *** join/#qi-hardware archang (~archang@122.133.52.113.static.ximdns.com) |
| 01:54.34 | *** join/#qi-hardware archang (~archang@122.133.52.113.static.ximdns.com) |
| 01:55.18 | *** join/#qi-hardware atommann (~atommann@58.251.2.94) |
| 02:04.18 | *** join/#qi-hardware xiangfu (~xiangfu@111.198.29.53) |
| 02:08.50 | *** join/#qi-hardware fengling (~fengling@2002:6fc6:1d35:0:8d2b:5921:bf3d:2956) |
| 03:24.46 | *** join/#qi-hardware archang (~archang@122.133.52.113.static.ximdns.com) |
| 03:54.06 | *** join/#qi-hardware fengling (~fengling@2002:6fc6:1d35:0:8d2b:5921:bf3d:2956) |
| 05:45.27 | *** join/#qi-hardware Textmode (~boneidle@adsl-1-au-2-174.ozonline.com.au) |
| 06:02.01 | *** join/#qi-hardware archang (~archang@122.133.52.113.static.ximdns.com) |
| 06:20.15 | *** join/#qi-hardware atommann (~atommann@58.251.2.94) |
| 06:28.03 | *** join/#qi-hardware arhuaco (~arhuaco__@186.80.243.165) |
| 08:12.44 | *** join/#qi-hardware pcercuei (~paul@137.71.226.54) |
| 08:37.51 | *** join/#qi-hardware wolfspraul (~wolfsprau@x4d0730c2.dyn.telefonica.de) |
| 09:05.41 | *** join/#qi-hardware atommann (~atommann@58.251.2.94) |
| 09:37.24 | *** join/#qi-hardware pcercuei (~paul@p4FC46DB6.dip0.t-ipconnect.de) |
| 10:05.21 | *** join/#qi-hardware jwhitmore (~jwhitmore@88.151.80.134) |
| 10:25.01 | *** join/#qi-hardware arossdotme (~zxy@79-69-193-255.dynamic.dsl.as9105.com) |
| 11:27.40 | *** join/#qi-hardware pcercuei (~paul@p4FC46DB6.dip0.t-ipconnect.de) |
| 11:32.07 | *** join/#qi-hardware valhalla (~valhalla@212.124.182.69) |
| 12:03.46 | *** join/#qi-hardware jekhor__ (~jek@port-202-adslby-pool38.infonet.by) |
| 12:13.25 | *** join/#qi-hardware pcercuei (~paul@p4FC46DB6.dip0.t-ipconnect.de) |
| 12:30.19 | *** join/#qi-hardware jwhitmore (~jwhitmore@88.151.80.134) |
| 12:42.31 | *** join/#qi-hardware pcercuei (~paul@p4FC46DB6.dip0.t-ipconnect.de) |
| 13:18.22 | *** join/#qi-hardware pcercuei_ (~paul@137.71.226.54) |
| 13:29.45 | *** join/#qi-hardware arossdotme (~zxy@79-69-195-205.dynamic.dsl.as9105.com) |
| 13:37.38 | *** join/#qi-hardware qwebirc62963 (a3f67e18@gateway/web/freenode/ip.163.246.126.24) |
| 13:52.34 | *** join/#qi-hardware arossdotme (~zxy@79-69-198-97.dynamic.dsl.as9105.com) |
| 13:58.19 | *** join/#qi-hardware pcercuei (~paul@137.71.226.54) |
| 14:06.15 | *** join/#qi-hardware jekhor_ (~jek@port-223-adslby-pool40.infonet.by) |
| 14:27.09 | *** join/#qi-hardware jwhitmore (~jwhitmore@109.76.114.172) |
| 14:30.14 | *** join/#qi-hardware jekhor__ (~jek@port-223-adslby-pool40.infonet.by) |
| 14:44.33 | *** join/#qi-hardware jekhor_ (~jek@port-223-adslby-pool40.infonet.by) |
| 14:49.53 | *** join/#qi-hardware pcercuei (~paul@137.71.226.54) |
| 14:51.06 | *** join/#qi-hardware jekhor_ (~jek@port-9-adslby-pool38.infonet.by) |
| 15:01.55 | rjeffries | wpwrak any anelok news? |
| 15:10.23 | wpwrak | rjeffries: mainly behind the scenes work |
| 15:11.01 | wpwrak | i have a new logo in the works, but i still need to get clearance to release it |
| 15:11.11 | rjeffries | still exploring battery options one mightt assume |
| 15:12.27 | wpwrak | and then there's the eternal topic of trying to find someone who could run the anelok company. lots of time spent on this without tangible results so far :-( |
| 15:12.48 | rjeffries | why do you not wish to be in charge? |
| 15:13.24 | wpwrak | this it becoming the main blocker these days. with most of the rest, i'm pretty much as far as i can go |
| 15:13.46 | wpwrak | oh, many reasons: |
| 15:14.38 | *** join/#qi-hardware pcercuei (~paul@137.71.226.54) |
| 15:14.42 | wpwrak | 1) i don't know enough about running a company to get this right, especially where compliance is concerned |
| 15:15.18 | wpwrak | 2) if i created a company in argentina, that would be useless. if i created it abroad, from here, this would be very difficult and expensive. |
| 15:15.38 | rjeffries | nods (had not thought of that angle) |
| 15:16.01 | wpwrak | 3) even a company abroad but owned by me would have me as the owner under the argentine legal system, which i don't trust. |
| 15:18.05 | rjeffries | ok |
| 15:18.13 | wpwrak | so i basically need someone who knows the basics of running a company (and who has access to help if there are holes in that knowledge), is willing to set it up, complete with a bank account, and has time and interest to run it, do the paperwork, and such |
| 15:18.40 | rjeffries | hmmm |
| 15:19.09 | wpwrak | a small complication is that crowdfunding or -investment/-loaning/etc. is a non-standard process, so that person doesn't have to be afraid of this and have some willingness to explore the options |
| 15:19.16 | larsc | I think there are companies in the cayman islands that specialise in such services |
| 15:19.26 | wpwrak | details depend on what local laws apply and such |
| 15:20.18 | wpwrak | larsc: yes, no problem. for something like 5 kEUR i could get a "fully managed" offshore company :) |
| 15:21.07 | rjeffries | I assume crowdfunding is A) possible and B) has a decent chance of success. |
| 15:22.02 | rjeffries | Is USA a desirable location for the company, or do you reject it? |
| 15:22.37 | wpwrak | to the ~5k, add some fees for necessary extras (like getting a bank account), but i guess with about 10k, all would be taken care of. at my current savings rate, i could afford that in about -3 or -4 years. now where did i put that time machine again ... ? ;-) |
| 15:23.53 | wpwrak | rjeffries: for the first phase, i'd like to try crowd-loan or -investment instead of crowdfunding. three main reasons: |
| 15:24.02 | rjeffries | what are your compliance concerns? are you talking about e.g. FCC and similar in Europe/ Since anelok is low voltage there are no saftey concerns |
| 15:24.04 | wpwrak | a) reduce the amount of money that needs to be moved early, |
| 15:24.17 | wpwrak | b) to reduce the number of people we need to convince, and |
| 15:24.58 | wpwrak | c) to have a more mature product with a shorter time to delivery when doing the crowdfunding -> higher appeal. |
| 15:25.31 | rjeffries | explain to me how crowd-loan etc might work. I am ignorant of that concept |
| 15:26.20 | wpwrak | (usa) it's a possibility. US have the problem of a large local troll population, but the regulations for doing business seem to be pretty friendly. i wouldn't expect anelok to trigger much government interference. |
| 15:27.05 | *** join/#qi-hardware jekhor (~jek@port-116-adslby-pool42.infonet.by) |
| 15:27.17 | wpwrak | another disadvantage of US would be from a marketing side, being the home of the NSA :) but then, it would be kinda hard to find a country that doesn't have similar or worse issues ... |
| 15:28.25 | rjeffries | actually setting up a business here in US is pretty straight ahead. Agree about negative aspect of NSA, but that is a global issue. |
| 15:28.33 | wpwrak | (compliance) bookkeeping, tax filings and such, paying the right taxes at the right time. the boring stuff ;) FCC and such are a separate issue, but that's one i know better. |
| 15:29.54 | wpwrak | (setting up is easy) yes, in many countries it's almost trivial. takes some USD 100-200 out of your pocket for administrative fees, and that's about it. |
| 15:30.10 | rjeffries | I find that using a solid honest Certified Public Accountant (CPA) works for small business. Not cheap but very managable cost |
| 15:30.41 | rjeffries | getting the accounting right is the key. taxes must be handled by the book. period. |
| 15:31.16 | wpwrak | (crowd-loan) the idea is that backers don't place what's effectively a pre-order (i.e., the kickstarter model), but give a loan or make an investment into the project |
| 15:31.51 | wpwrak | this has the following benefits over crowdfunding: |
| 15:31.58 | rjeffries | side question, pls be patient for a moment: how does anelok help a user when they have a mobile phone? I understand the PC use case better |
| 15:32.50 | wpwrak | i) you only need to find enough money to complete the next steps, not as much as you need until production (or, alternatively, you can lie about how much you really need. which is what most kickstarters seem to do.) |
| 15:34.04 | wpwrak | ii) since each person's contribution is limited only by how much the person wants to put into it, but not by the cost of the product, there can be considerably more money per backer than with crowdfunding |
| 15:34.21 | *** join/#qi-hardware pcercuei (~paul@137.71.226.54) |
| 15:35.15 | rjeffries | I like this crowd loan idea, a LOT. Besides I think your odds of success are pretty high. not 100 percent but well into the 90 percent range |
| 15:35.26 | wpwrak | iii) lower total amount + higher per-person amount = a much smaller number of backers is needed. hence the campaign can be simpler, too, and the product doesn't have to be as polished/mature as it should to be for crowdfunding |
| 15:35.42 | rjeffries | understood. SOLD. |
| 15:36.32 | *** join/#qi-hardware Haswell (~broaderba@unaffiliated/haswell) |
| 15:37.07 | wpwrak | iv) it matches the cost structure of a project that still has significant R&D to do much better than crowdfunding. crowdfunding is perfect if your r&d is done and all you need is to start producing. but the more r&d you have, the less honest the campaign typically becomes :) |
| 15:37.26 | wpwrak | drawbacks of crowdloaning/-investment: |
| 15:38.06 | wpwrak | A) less established concept, so it may be difficult to find backers who trust it |
| 15:38.57 | wpwrak | B) there are legal limitations to what you can do. e.g., can you promise, say, an interest ? or some sort of participation in gains ? |
| 15:39.50 | wpwrak | C) likewise, some forms of participation may incur hefty reporting and oversight requirements. e.g., can you just sell shares and make your own rules, or do you face many restrictions ? |
| 15:40.12 | rjeffries | in a way, it's a way to raise a small "Angel" funding round, so yeah, legal issues would be a bit tricky |
| 15:40.20 | wpwrak | that also varies a lot from country to country. so this needs [access to] some expertise |
| 15:40.40 | rjeffries | In US this is angel financing pure and simple. |
| 15:43.35 | wpwrak | (CPA) yes, probably the best path. unless the person running the shop has the necessary knowledge. one issue is that the thing has to be able to start with very little money. so anything that requires major upfront spendings before we can get funds from the community is a no-go (unless the future director has such cash sitting around) |
| 15:44.09 | wpwrak | ah, and the form of incorporation should be one that limits liability. again, the can be more or less cumbersome, depending on country |
| 15:45.08 | rjeffries | agreed. In US a low-cost approach is called a Limited Liability Corporation or LLC. not expensive to establish, but does incur ongoing costs per year. |
| 15:46.18 | wpwrak | but i think many places now have some form of low-overhead Ltd. e.g., in .de it was the case that you needed at least 20 kEUR as company capital to start an Ltd., but then lots of germans started their Ltd. in the UK, because there are no such requirements. in a surprising act of agility, the german government then introduced a pretty lean variant that has no such obstacles |
| 15:47.16 | wpwrak | yes, LLC sounds about right. what's the ongoing cost ? |
| 15:50.18 | wpwrak | for defining the funding concept, one would have to determine a) what is actually possible with reasonable effort, b) what would potential backers accept (we can try the qi-hw community for reactions on that), c) and of course also have an idea of how much money the thing needs. which in turn also depends on operational costs (the R&D side is easier :) |
| 15:51.36 | rjeffries | understood. will investigate ongoing LLC cost in California. (Need a couple of days max) |
| 15:53.19 | wpwrak | there are also other forms than an LLC that may be worth a look, e.g., a cooperative or a "club". those forms would emphasize the participatory nature, especially of the investors, but would limit what the entity can do, and may (or may not) have additional paperwork requirements |
| 15:54.54 | wpwrak | generally speaking, clubs tend to be easy to set up and seem to have good means to limit liability, but they can't make gains. however, that doesn't stop them from doing other things that are worth money. i.e., there are people who work at a non-profit or even charity and live rather comfortable lives :) |
| 15:56.13 | *** part/#qi-hardware damokr (a3f67e18@gateway/web/freenode/ip.163.246.126.24) |
| 15:57.00 | rjeffries | interesting idea |
| 15:57.36 | rjeffries | have reached out to an old friend who has doen angel investing (NOT to ask him for money) rather to get ideas |
| 15:58.19 | wpwrak | excellent, thanks ! |
| 15:58.19 | rjeffries | club idea may have merit. we have a "not for profit" corportaion in US, pretty difficult to get approval. |
| 15:59.23 | wpwrak | is the approval difficulty for "not for profit" or for "charity" ? as i understand it, charities are difficult, but non-profit shouldn't be |
| 16:02.12 | wpwrak | as i understand it, charities have the benefit that donations are tax-deductible while a non-charity does not enjoy such benefits. so that makes charities interesting if you tax system has bumps, e.g., if your tax function is f(), and you have conditions where X - f(X) < (X+Y) - f(X+Y) with X some reference income/wealth/etc. and Y > 0 an increment |
| 16:02.36 | wpwrak | if you have that case, it makes sense, financially, to "burn" those Y in a tax-deductible way |
| 16:03.19 | wpwrak | so that may be one of the reasons why people are interested getting charity approval, even if it's painful. but i don't see anelok going in this direction. |
| 16:03.38 | rjeffries | I need to look into non-profit more. There has to be some social benefit if I understand correctly, so yes, they are considered charities and do not pay tax, which is a big deal. |
| 16:04.02 | rjeffries | I think it would be a dead end for what you need to do, so we agree |
| 16:06.27 | wpwrak | according to wikipedia, there seem to be many grades of NPOs in the US: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nonprofit_organization#United_States |
| 16:07.37 | rjeffries | willread that |
| 16:08.10 | wpwrak | right above it, there's the UK model, which may be simpler (or maybe just lacks details), which is basically how i picture all that stuff |
| 16:08.41 | *** join/#qi-hardware pcercuei (~paul@137.71.226.54) |
| 16:09.03 | wpwrak | i.e., an NPO simply doesn't make profits, i.e., it can't pay shareholders or such, while a charity is more complicated |
| 16:09.07 | rjeffries | actually I now remember a Santa Barbara (80 miles away) organization with a makerspace did get non-profit corporation set up |
| 16:09.53 | wpwrak | yup, that makes sense |
| 16:09.57 | rjeffries | and like you said, NPOs are famous for having decent compenation for staff. nothing wrong with that IMO |
| 16:11.32 | wpwrak | for an NPO, the question would then be what it could do for backers. e.g., could it pay interest on private loans ? somewhere there must a limit before it becomes just a for-profit, but i don't know where that limit is |
| 16:12.17 | rjeffries | I doubt it is the way to get started quickly, but may be wrong |
| 16:12.34 | rjeffries | people who loan money will want to make some return |
| 16:14.05 | wpwrak | that would seem plausible. also as a compensation the opportunity cost and for the risk they're taking |
| 16:14.56 | wpwrak | of course, if such return would be relatively small in value, it could be in terms of "gifts" from the production line, in addition to paying back a loan |
| 16:15.22 | wpwrak | again, any such plan would need checking if it crosses some legal boundaries |
| 16:17.57 | rjeffries | that's a clever thought. may be in a gray area legally however. |
| 16:19.51 | rjeffries | don't want to encourage chaing ghosts but is there any chance anelok can also serve as a tool for two factor authentication? Ubikey seems to own that space from the little I know |
| 16:20.28 | wpwrak | yubikey, yes they seem to be doing quite well |
| 16:21.33 | rjeffries | they do noy do exactly what anelok does, correct |
| 16:21.35 | wpwrak | and, well, at the end of the day, anelok is a little general-purpose computer. so if you want to turn it into a tetris game console, compute digits of pi, or such, that's all your choice :) |
| 16:22.15 | wpwrak | the only constraints are memory and cpu power. so if your two-factor system uses algorithms with high overhead, that could be a problem |
| 16:22.50 | rjeffries | that may be a hidden (not so hidden) strength of your platform. If it caught on and was leveraged for a few other use cases... |
| 16:23.27 | wpwrak | i want the anelok system to be "open". have a way for developers to put their own modules into the firmware. and have a process for elevating 3rd part modules also to "official" status |
| 16:24.17 | wpwrak | and of course, if you get a developer version, you can do as you please. e.g., make it run just that tetris :) |
| 16:24.27 | *** join/#qi-hardware Haswell (~broaderba@unaffiliated/haswell) |
| 16:24.43 | wpwrak | someone suggested "pong" using the radio interface :) |
| 16:26.26 | wpwrak | the open architecture also means that anyone you trust could provide a customized bundle, without needing any approval from anelok-company |
| 16:27.14 | wpwrak | all they need are non-locked boards (locked = only signed firmware is accepted) |
| 16:28.19 | wpwrak | and as an intermediate step, customers could also add new firmware signatures. lots of possibilities. |
| 16:29.18 | wpwrak | (of course, none of this is implemented yet. right now, it'll happily load whatever firmware is offered via USB, without a second thought :) |
| 16:50.58 | rjeffries | anyway let's not go down a rathoel about a "what if" |
| 16:52.08 | rjeffries | need to go. nice chatting. will let you know what I learn |
| 16:54.10 | wpwrak | great, thanks ! |
| 16:55.29 | wpwrak | what's a bit galling about such things is that there are people who manage all this sort of stuff with disdainful ease, yet it feels like mission impossible for lowly engineers like me ... |
| 18:14.36 | *** join/#qi-hardware FDCX_ (~fdcx@ceata/consiliu/FDCX) |
| 18:15.57 | *** join/#qi-hardware jekhor (~jek@nat-minsk-pool-46-53-200-107.telecom.by) |
| 18:58.51 | *** join/#qi-hardware kyak (~kyak@unaffiliated/kyak) |
| 19:23.19 | *** join/#qi-hardware dandon (~dandon@88.151.72.84) |
| 19:38.15 | rjeffries | understood |
| 19:40.32 | rjeffries | http://citrixstartupaccelerator.com/santa-barbara/ |
| 19:51.42 | *** join/#qi-hardware arossdotme (~zxy@79-69-203-52.dynamic.dsl.as9105.com) |
| 19:55.12 | wpwrak | rjeffries: there are a lot of these now, yes. they're all very location-specific and you need to be able to take a 3 month break for this. besides, this one is about sw only, not hw. |
| 19:58.31 | wpwrak | the concept is called "incubator". you basically take a team with ideas and put it in the incubator, which provides the infrastructure. not a bad idea per se, but you basically need to find one at the location of the team (tricky with anelok: for now, the "team" is basically just me - growing a developer community will be one of the next challenges the project has to face), plus it has to be compatible with what you're trying to do |
| 20:03.31 | *** join/#qi-hardware Textmode (~boneidle@adsl-1-au-2-174.ozonline.com.au) |
| 21:00.24 | *** join/#qi-hardware Nik05 (~Nik05@unaffiliated/nik05) |
| 22:06.23 | *** join/#qi-hardware dandon_ (~dandon@88.151.79.95) |
| 23:02.35 | *** join/#qi-hardware kristianpaul (~kristianp@unaffiliated/kristianpaul) |
| 23:22.02 | *** join/#qi-hardware infobot (ibot@rikers.org) |
| 23:22.02 | *** topic/#qi-hardware is Copyleft hardware - http://qi-hardware.com | hardware hackers join here to discuss Ben NanoNote, atben/atusb 802.15.4 wireless, anelok and other community driven hw projects | public logging at http://en.qi-hardware.com/irclogs and http://irclog.whitequark.org/qi-hardware |
| 23:22.02 | *** mode/#qi-hardware [+v infobot] by ChanServ |
| 23:27.26 | nicksydney_ | wpwrak: http://mcuoneclipse.com/2015/05/17/tinyk20-open-source-arm-debuguniversal-board-first-prototypes/ |