| 02:00.44 | *** join/#qi-hardware fengling (~fengling@2002:6fc6:1d36:0:9c62:3a00:6e8b:200e) |
| 02:06.58 | *** join/#qi-hardware atommann (~atommann@58.251.2.94) |
| 02:11.27 | *** join/#qi-hardware archang (~archang@111.198.29.53) |
| 02:32.30 | *** join/#qi-hardware fengling (~fengling@2002:6fc6:1d36:0:cd6b:65f:8719:e3e5) |
| 03:10.05 | *** join/#qi-hardware fengling (~fengling@2002:6fc6:1d36:0:d986:59f2:32f:8020) |
| 04:12.31 | *** join/#qi-hardware porchao (~quassel@218.231.187.90.eo.eaccess.ne.jp) |
| 05:18.19 | *** join/#qi-hardware fengling (~fengling@2002:6fc6:1d36:0:d986:59f2:32f:8020) |
| 05:52.57 | *** join/#qi-hardware Haswell (~broaderba@unaffiliated/haswell) |
| 07:27.53 | *** join/#qi-hardware atommann (~atommann@58.251.2.94) |
| 07:48.31 | *** join/#qi-hardware atommann (~atommann@58.251.2.94) |
| 08:26.23 | *** join/#qi-hardware wolfspraul (~wolfsprau@brln-d9ba084b.pool.mediaWays.net) |
| 08:48.53 | *** join/#qi-hardware pcercuei (~paul@137.71.226.54) |
| 08:54.02 | *** join/#qi-hardware rejon (~rejon@223.17.152.15) |
| 09:16.17 | viric | damn soldering of earphone cables. |
| 09:16.57 | viric | how to solder them well? They have a plastic core in the middle |
| 09:31.27 | whitequark | do it really quickly. |
| 09:31.58 | whitequark | put a blob of flux on it, press it against whatever you want to solder, use the iron at, say... 230° or 250° |
| 09:32.02 | whitequark | touch it for half a second to a second |
| 09:32.11 | whitequark | you'll get away with almost no damage to plastic |
| 09:34.57 | viric | I really don't master that. |
| 09:35.04 | viric | the soldering is always too bad. |
| 09:35.18 | viric | the result soldering. |
| 09:40.01 | *** join/#qi-hardware atommann (~atommann@58.251.2.94) |
| 09:47.01 | whitequark | do you use enough flux and a decent iron? |
| 09:47.22 | whitequark | the iron they use to solder galvanized buckets won't work |
| 09:48.05 | viric | there is much to say about the decency of my soldering |
| 10:03.43 | *** join/#qi-hardware xiangfu (~xiangfu@111.198.29.54) |
| 10:10.09 | *** join/#qi-hardware xiangfu (~xiangfu@111.198.29.53) |
| 10:34.58 | *** join/#qi-hardware sb0 (~lekernel@88.128.80.58) |
| 11:56.01 | arossdotme | i have my solder wire sticking up and i hold the wire near it and with the soldering iron i go up and down and melt/burn awy the plaseic and in the end the wire gets tined so i can solder it to the contact like i normaly wood |
| 11:56.49 | arossdotme | while leting/burning away the pastice core i'l consertinuarly adding more solder at the same time which helps to clean it |
| 11:57.11 | arossdotme | constantly |
| 12:23.34 | *** join/#qi-hardware freespace (KNqo1SBN@stark.pictorii.com) |
| 12:28.04 | *** join/#qi-hardware freespace (VY8NGdsp@stark.pictorii.com) |
| 12:36.06 | whitequark | gross |
| 12:58.57 | *** join/#qi-hardware sb0 (~lekernel@88.128.80.68) |
| 13:27.02 | *** join/#qi-hardware atommann (~atommann@222.248.72.156) |
| 15:15.45 | *** join/#qi-hardware Nik05 (~Nik05@unaffiliated/nik05) |
| 16:05.47 | DocScrutinizer05 | prolly ideally you crimp |
| 16:07.21 | DocScrutinizer05 | whitequark: I'd use 280 .. 300 |
| 16:08.08 | DocScrutinizer05 | but then I usually do such stuff without using extra flux, just decent soldering wire |
| 16:48.17 | *** join/#qi-hardware archang (~archang@111.198.29.54) |
| 18:09.49 | wpwrak | funny. upgrading ubuntu, at "ca-certificates configuration" it asks me to "During upgrades, new certificates will be added. Please choose those you trust." |
| 18:10.30 | wpwrak | now, do i trust, say, DigiCert_Assured_ID_Root_G3.crt ? or maybe QuoVadis_Root_CA_1_G3.crt ? |
| 18:11.36 | wpwrak | looks like a shining example an eight-line highway diligently paved with the best of intentions, leading straight to hell |
| 18:14.04 | viric | yes |
| 19:09.45 | wpwrak | eight-lAne, even :) |
| 19:11.56 | viric | in a cyanogenmod update, the stock browser disabled the privacy setting "show security warnings". |
| 19:12.10 | viric | all https certificates were ok. |
| 19:12.23 | viric | yes, there is a setting "show security warnings". |
| 19:20.33 | wpwrak | in a way, one could consider this a correct decision: most of the security warnings are pointless and just confuse. |
| 19:21.45 | *** join/#qi-hardware wej (~j@2001:1af8:4010:a08c:1::6e) |
| 19:24.19 | viric | well, disabling it means "ignore silently any security warning" |
| 19:25.33 | wpwrak | saves people the work to click away the incomprehensible technobabble :) |
| 19:26.01 | wpwrak | and of course, once they're conditioned, they'll also miss the one they should have paid attention to |
| 19:26.27 | viric | very useful. |
| 19:27.25 | wpwrak | the problem is relevance vs. coverage. the current approach of complain about every small issue maximizes coverage but has lousy relevance. |
| 19:28.13 | viric | most people should not encounter much https alerts |
| 19:28.32 | wpwrak | what could solve that problem is a list of "important" sites. e.g., sites where abuse can do serious damage. e.g., banks, major portals, etc. |
| 19:29.00 | wpwrak | oh, go anywhere with a self-signed certificate and the browsers will bitch with no end. |
| 19:29.13 | wpwrak | of course, that's a total relevance failure |
| 19:30.53 | wpwrak | ("important sites") of course with the inherent issue that a site that's important to you may not be on that list |
| 19:31.29 | wpwrak | especially if a site has very heterogeneous usage profiles |
| 19:31.54 | wpwrak | at a bank, profiles are pretty much identical |
| 19:32.09 | wpwrak | at, say, an amateur porn site, they may be very different |
| 19:32.35 | wpwrak | e.g., someone may register just to be able to click on some "like" button or to comment |
| 19:32.59 | wpwrak | other people may post their pictures, maintain contacts, etc. |
| 19:33.20 | wpwrak | ... and before you know it, you have "the fappening, the sequel" |
| 19:33.46 | wpwrak | (so yes, that apple stuff pretty much qualifies as part-time amateur porn site ;-) |
| 19:36.29 | wpwrak | well, one possibility would be to come up with a way to let the browser know whether something "important" is being done. then it could complain only in such cases. |
| 19:37.21 | wpwrak | but how do you do this ? |
| 19:40.08 | *** join/#qi-hardware pcercuei (~pcercuei@2a02:810d:1b40:1118:1af4:6aff:fec5:1c8f) |
| 19:59.45 | *** join/#qi-hardware unclouded (~neil@2001:4428:200:80fc:7e05:7ff:fe0d:d421) |
| 20:35.09 | *** join/#qi-hardware qi-bot (~qi-bot@turandot.qi-hardware.com) |
| 20:35.09 | *** mode/#qi-hardware [+o qi-bot] by ChanServ |
| 21:08.54 | *** join/#qi-hardware wej (~j@2001:1af8:4010:a08c:1::6e) |
| 22:51.19 | roh | heho |
| 22:52.09 | roh | anybody an idea how to find a unknown defective switching regulator only by its package markings? i really hate those sot23 style markings (2-5 chars random) |
| 22:53.34 | roh | i got something that makes an unknown voltage from 12V dc together with something that would be a external fet (from its wiring) and i only know its labeled 'BNSP' and has 5 pins.. |
| 22:53.58 | roh | linear calls it the S-5 marking, but it seems not all pdf do that so nice ;) |
| 23:27.42 | wpwrak | go to digi-key, filter down to all that match, then look at the data sheets ? :) |
| 23:44.07 | roh | wpwrak: done that.. didnt find it... |
| 23:44.15 | roh | well... back to ebay with that piece of crap |