| 00:12.22 | *** join/#oe JaMa (~martin@94.230.152.246) |
| 00:13.25 | *** join/#oe darknighte (~darknight@unaffiliated/darknighte) |
| 00:14.51 | cs_nbp | muriani jumped on the netbook-pro 3.1 kernel train :D |
| 00:31.29 | *** join/#oe slonsiki (~slonsiki@69-12-177-67.dsl.static.sonic.net) |
| 01:25.38 | cs_nbp | bbZ |
| 01:25.41 | *** part/#oe cs_nbp (4e5edf67@gateway/web/freenode/ip.78.94.223.103) |
| 01:38.45 | *** join/#oe kgilmer (~kgilmer@ntngsk048178.ngsk.nt.ftth4.ppp.infoweb.ne.jp) |
| 03:05.42 | *** join/#oe devzero_ (devzero@xdsl-89-0-73-132.netcologne.de) |
| 03:23.58 | *** join/#oe leslie_ (~quassel@114.92.125.218) |
| 03:38.21 | *** join/#oe Openfree` (~Openfreer@116.228.88.131) |
| 03:50.24 | *** join/#oe leslie_ (~quassel@114.92.125.218) |
| 04:16.21 | *** join/#oe sgw1 (~sgw@c-71-193-189-117.hsd1.wa.comcast.net) |
| 04:25.57 | *** join/#oe risca (~risca@wnpgmb0412w-ds01-123-237.dynamic.mtsallstream.net) |
| 04:44.43 | *** join/#oe leslie_ (~quassel@114.92.125.218) |
| 04:50.03 | *** join/#oe sgw (~sgw@c-71-193-189-117.hsd1.wa.comcast.net) |
| 05:52.45 | *** join/#oe snkt (~snkt@114.143.161.178) |
| 05:56.36 | snkt | hello |
| 05:58.27 | snkt | I m building x11-image with uClibc ..... I m getting at last stage of building rootfs...... I m getting http://pastebin.mozilla.org/1437822 |
| 05:58.34 | snkt | can anyone help me' |
| 06:13.02 | *** join/#oe ensc|w (~ensc@www.sigma-chemnitz.de) |
| 06:13.54 | *** join/#oe lamawithonel (~lucas@pool-71-191-3-38.washdc.east.verizon.net) |
| 06:36.56 | *** join/#oe erwt (~erwt@114.143.161.178) |
| 06:43.00 | *** join/#oe leslie__ (~quassel@114.92.125.218) |
| 07:21.13 | *** join/#oe leslie___ (~quassel@66.79.164.228) |
| 07:21.27 | *** join/#oe leslie____ (~quassel@66.79.164.228) |
| 07:34.46 | *** join/#oe Jay7 (jay@176.15.91.97) |
| 07:59.23 | *** join/#oe jekhor (~jek@vulture2-nat-43.telecom.by) |
| 08:01.02 | *** join/#oe ao2 (~ao2@2001:1418:117::1) |
| 08:10.53 | *** join/#oe joelagnel (~joel@188.116.243.214) |
| 08:20.49 | *** join/#oe leslie_ (~quassel@114.92.125.218) |
| 08:21.04 | *** join/#oe leslie__ (~quassel@114.92.125.218) |
| 08:21.35 | *** join/#oe notespace (~notespace@dsl081-118-011.dfw1.dsl.speakeasy.net) |
| 08:28.23 | *** join/#oe msm (~msm@99-47-177-27.lightspeed.austtx.sbcglobal.net) |
| 08:38.05 | *** join/#oe eFfeM (~frans@a2038.upc-a.chello.nl) |
| 08:45.25 | eFfeM | gm |
| 09:05.17 | *** join/#oe leslie___ (~quassel@66.79.164.228) |
| 09:05.33 | *** join/#oe leslie____ (~quassel@66.79.164.228) |
| 09:28.49 | *** join/#oe GarthPS (~quassel@qrc29-1-82-245-206-103.fbx.proxad.net) |
| 09:54.53 | *** join/#oe leslie_ (~quassel@114.92.125.218) |
| 09:55.08 | *** join/#oe leslie__ (~quassel@114.92.125.218) |
| 09:57.32 | *** join/#oe sterNiX (~LessIsMor@unaffiliated/nu253r/x-0655220) |
| 11:08.33 | otavio | :-) |
| 11:10.13 | *** join/#oe pepermint (~pepermint@host28-87-dynamic.4-87-r.retail.telecomitalia.it) |
| 11:14.29 | *** join/#oe sterNiX (~LessIsMor@unaffiliated/nu253r/x-0655220) |
| 11:17.58 | *** join/#oe rob_w (~bob@unaffiliated/rob-w/x-1112029) |
| 11:24.25 | *** join/#oe GNUtoo|laptop (~gnutoo@host204-5-dynamic.244-95-r.retail.telecomitalia.it) |
| 11:57.05 | *** join/#oe bluelightning (~paul@cpc2-lewi17-2-0-cust101.2-4.cable.virginmedia.com) |
| 11:57.05 | *** join/#oe bluelightning (~paul@pdpc/supporter/professional/bluelightning) |
| 12:31.07 | erwt | Does Oe support dietlibc klibc ? |
| 12:34.30 | bluelightning | there's klibc support, I think dietlibc is unmaintained |
| 12:37.12 | erwt | bluelightning, hav u tried it ? |
| 12:37.42 | bluelightning | erwt: I've built/used kexecboot, that makes use of klibc |
| 12:37.49 | bluelightning | other than that, no |
| 12:38.31 | bluelightning | erwt: you could ask ant, he's not around now though |
| 12:38.46 | erwt | bluelightning, thanks |
| 12:39.24 | erwt | bluelightning, i have build a basic x11-image using uclibc today , |
| 12:40.02 | erwt | but the size of usr/lib is itself 27 Mb stripped |
| 12:41.37 | *** join/#oe cs_nbp (4e5edf67@gateway/web/freenode/ip.78.94.223.103) |
| 12:41.42 | erwt | bluelightning, i thought using uclibc it will lessen the size ,but i think is fruitless |
| 12:42.51 | *** join/#oe yann (~dwitch@nan92-1-81-57-214-146.fbx.proxad.net) |
| 12:43.27 | erwt | Is there any technique to reduce the file size completely |
| 12:48.57 | *** join/#oe yann (~dwitch@nan92-1-81-57-214-146.fbx.proxad.net) |
| 12:49.07 | cs_nbp | depends how much u need |
| 12:50.13 | cs_nbp | and if the file can be in an archive |
| 12:50.23 | cs_nbp | (missed most of the discussion though) |
| 12:50.35 | erwt | cs_nbp, how |
| 12:58.38 | *** join/#oe jekhor (~jek@178.121.207.42) |
| 13:11.11 | *** join/#oe mhnoyes (~mhnoyes@74-47-190-56.dr01.myck.or.frontiernet.net) |
| 13:11.11 | *** join/#oe mhnoyes (~mhnoyes@sourceforge/sitedocs/mhnoyes) |
| 13:18.38 | *** join/#oe dos1 (~dos@unaffiliated/dos1) |
| 14:25.44 | *** join/#oe zenlinux (~sgarman@c-76-115-40-64.hsd1.or.comcast.net) |
| 14:25.44 | *** join/#oe thaytan (~thaytan@113.94.233.220.static.exetel.com.au) |
| 14:25.44 | *** join/#oe mckoan|away (~marco@unaffiliated/mckoan) |
| 14:25.44 | *** join/#oe penghb (~penghb@202.108.130.153) |
| 14:25.45 | *** join/#oe eFfeM_work (~frans@D4B26BC1.static.ziggozakelijk.nl) |
| 14:25.45 | *** join/#oe SidH_ (~SidH@203.101.61.10) |
| 14:25.45 | *** join/#oe openfree (~dennis@116.228.88.131) |
| 14:25.45 | *** join/#oe mwester (~mwester@nslu2-linux/mwester) |
| 14:25.45 | *** join/#oe Zygo (startkeylo@startkeylogger.hungrycats.org) |
| 14:31.05 | *** join/#oe jekhor (~jek@178.121.207.42) |
| 14:42.30 | *** join/#oe leslie__ (~quassel@114.92.125.218) |
| 14:54.49 | *** join/#oe psinix (4e5e2c87@gateway/web/freenode/ip.78.94.44.135) |
| 14:55.18 | *** join/#oe playya__ (~playya@unaffiliated/playya) |
| 15:04.59 | *** join/#oe dijenerate (~dijenerat@66.54.118.89) |
| 15:06.06 | *** join/#oe devzero_ (devzero@xdsl-89-0-77-226.netcologne.de) |
| 15:10.46 | *** join/#oe psinix (4e5e2c87@gateway/web/freenode/ip.78.94.44.135) |
| 15:12.30 | *** join/#oe pespin (~pespin@90.163.63.131) |
| 15:12.43 | eFfeM | erwt: uclibc will save you 1-1.5 MB, other way to reduce is throw packages out of your image (or build something small like minimal-console-image); and if you are flash constrained use e.g. squashfs |
| 15:16.13 | erwt | eFfeM, thanks a lot i am trying console-base-image |
| 15:17.23 | eFfeM | erwt: the image for my product is about 2.5 MB, but it contains not too much: busybox, mtd-utils, i2c-tools, syslog and a few other small things and of course the product app |
| 15:18.06 | erwt | eFfeM, i want your package list plz ......................... |
| 15:18.36 | eFfeM | erwt: give me a minute, it is on another system and I need to finish something else first |
| 15:19.34 | *** join/#oe tdebrouw (~tdebrouw@91.182.4.158) |
| 15:20.29 | *** join/#oe ensc (~irc-ensc@fedora/ensc) |
| 15:21.39 | erwt | eFfeM, ya definitely |
| 15:23.26 | eFfeM | erwt: here is the list of non proprietary packages in my image: http://pastebin.com/twYL8JRX |
| 15:24.33 | eFfeM | you might even leave out some things, guess the first 4 and maybe dropbear are close to the bare minimum |
| 15:24.53 | eFfeM | btw and 2.5 MB was measured on power pc, if you have another architecture you might get different sizes. |
| 15:25.07 | erwt | eFfeM, does it have X |
| 15:25.13 | eFfeM | no |
| 15:26.03 | eFfeM | X will add quite a lot wrt libs (but if you want to have it display on a remote system you do not need x server, only client libs afaik) |
| 15:26.28 | erwt | eFfeM, did u create a .bb file for your self |
| 15:27.17 | eFfeM | yes, I always create my own image recipes, use one of the recipes like console-base-image as a starter and add whatever you need to the list of pacakges |
| 15:27.30 | erwt | i am doing that |
| 15:27.46 | eFfeM | to IMAGE_INSTALL |
| 15:28.02 | erwt | but the file size of console-base-image is 27.3 Mb |
| 15:28.08 | erwt | basic |
| 15:28.12 | eFfeM | ouch |
| 15:28.19 | erwt | thats my cause |
| 15:29.46 | eFfeM | i would expect it to be smaller, but there is an option in local.conf that you can set to keep the root fs (forgot the exact name) then after rebuidling the image you can see in deploy/rootfs or so what is installed |
| 15:29.52 | erwt | eFfeM, i used angstrom distribution |
| 15:30.05 | eFfeM | for what hw? |
| 15:30.16 | erwt | mini2440 |
| 15:30.24 | eFfeM | it'll probably drag in all kinds of crap that you do not want/need |
| 15:31.02 | eFfeM | e.g. I have no audio stuff, no usb stuff stuff, no wifi etc etc |
| 15:31.30 | *** join/#oe jekhor (~jek@178.121.11.248) |
| 15:32.15 | eFfeM | smallest image is probably micro-base-image.bb, not sure if that builds for angstrom though |
| 15:32.41 | eFfeM | but if you want full control that could be a starting point (and only add whatever you need) |
| 15:32.59 | eFfeM | btw angstrom might also give you quite a lot of kernel modules, not sure if you want those |
| 15:33.20 | eFfeM | I use a hand configured kernel, no modules, only configure what I need |
| 15:33.25 | erwt | i dont want them at all |
| 15:34.04 | eFfeM | but then again I do not need to deal with people coming with webcam X or wifi dongle Y and expect it to work |
| 15:34.13 | eFfeM | angstrom might well add lots of those. |
| 15:34.35 | eFfeM | but for angstrom specifics, peek at your rootfs dir and/or maybe ask in #angstrom |
| 15:38.31 | erwt | eFfeM, i will tell u a list of packages monday .............with which i want to build , |
| 15:38.49 | erwt | just guide me regarding that |
| 15:41.53 | bluelightning | ericben: hi, btw is all OK on your side with the recent qt patches? |
| 15:43.12 | erwt | eFfeM, bluelightning cs_nbp ,good bye good nite |
| 15:43.24 | bluelightning | erwt: goodnight |
| 15:43.25 | eFfeM | nite erwt |
| 15:43.37 | *** join/#oe Heinervdm (~thomas@pD9E12985.dip.t-dialin.net) |
| 15:59.51 | *** join/#oe dijenerate (~dijenerat@65.48.188.246) |
| 16:00.48 | otavio | Is there a way to make bitbake to fetch a file but save it under another name at DL_DIR? |
| 16:02.35 | eFfeM | otavio: not sure if you do it when fetching but you can always append to do_fetch or prepend to do_configure or so and rename the file |
| 16:03.11 | otavio | eFfeM: the problem is that the file, at the remote site, is not versioned |
| 16:03.27 | otavio | eFfeM: so I'd like to put the version prepended on the file name to avoid clashes |
| 16:04.02 | eFfeM | otavio: that brings the risk that the remote file may change at some point in time |
| 16:04.18 | eFfeM | guess I would be inclined to put it with a versioned name on a mirror |
| 16:04.38 | otavio | eFfeM: the version is at file remote path |
| 16:04.52 | otavio | eFfeM: it is the case of firefox l10n modules for example |
| 16:04.53 | eFfeM | ah ok |
| 16:05.06 | eFfeM | I think this can be done not sure though |
| 16:05.08 | eFfeM | how |
| 16:10.44 | *** join/#oe cbrake (~cbrake@oh-69-34-21-229.sta.embarqhsd.net) |
| 16:17.40 | *** join/#oe dijenerate (~dijenerat@65.48.188.246) |
| 16:18.38 | *** join/#oe msm (~msm@99-47-177-27.lightspeed.austtx.sbcglobal.net) |
| 16:19.44 | *** join/#oe dijenerate (~dijenerat@65.48.188.246) |
| 16:43.41 | kergoth | Hmm, anyone know if cbrake has his script for sending out the weekly commit info somewhere public? |
| 16:49.30 | otavio | kergoth: Can you read the backlog and look at what eFfeM and I were talking some minutes ago? |
| 16:49.39 | otavio | kergoth: do you know if this is possible? |
| 16:50.05 | kergoth | I don't know of a way to specify a destination filename for a fetch. |
| 17:11.24 | *** join/#oe dijenerate (~dijenerat@65.48.188.246) |
| 17:23.23 | *** join/#oe risca_ (~risca@wnpgmb0412w-ds01-123-237.dynamic.mtsallstream.net) |
| 17:30.02 | *** join/#oe dijenerate (~dijenerat@65.48.188.246) |
| 17:37.29 | cs_nbp | where does a layer.conf go? next to the local.conf or somewhere else? |
| 17:49.41 | *** join/#oe dijenerate (~dijenerat@65.48.188.246) |
| 18:10.04 | *** join/#oe GarthPS (~quassel@qrc29-1-82-245-206-103.fbx.proxad.net) |
| 18:15.32 | *** join/#oe jekhor (~jek@vulture2-nat-43.telecom.by) |
| 18:20.15 | *** join/#oe dijenerate (~dijenerat@65.48.188.246) |
| 18:23.38 | *** join/#oe bluelightning (~paul@cpc2-lewi17-2-0-cust101.2-4.cable.virginmedia.com) |
| 18:23.38 | *** join/#oe bluelightning (~paul@pdpc/supporter/professional/bluelightning) |
| 18:27.32 | *** join/#oe zecke (~ich@91-64-82-148-dynip.superkabel.de) |
| 18:28.23 | *** join/#oe nschle85|2 (~kvirc@178-27-184-116-dynip.superkabel.de) |
| 18:29.34 | nschle85|2 | hello, i have a question regarding LICENSE files, how do i create a recipe which does not provide a license file ? |
| 18:32.07 | *** join/#oe woglinde (~heinold@f052065100.adsl.alicedsl.de) |
| 18:39.35 | bluelightning | nschle85|2: the first question is why is there no license in the upstream source, if the recipe builds something that is? |
| 18:39.41 | *** join/#oe rah (~rah@cpc8-live19-2-0-cust155.know.cable.virginmedia.com) |
| 18:42.14 | nschle85|2 | bluelightning: i wanted to copy termcap from old oe dev into new dev branch and build,it recipes has configured gplv2 but the license is not contained in the upstrieam sources |
| 18:43.56 | bluelightning | nschle85|2: I think the recommended method now is to take a copy of the appropriate license file from the meta/files/common-licenses/ subdir |
| 18:44.20 | bluelightning | into the recipe's files/ subdir and then refer to that in LIC_FILES_CHKSUM |
| 18:44.47 | nschle85|2 | bluelightning: ok |
| 18:47.41 | *** join/#oe lamawithonel (~lucas@pool-71-191-3-38.washdc.east.verizon.net) |
| 18:48.12 | nschle85|2 | bluelightning: and how do i disable the qa check for licencse if i wat quickly build a recipe without clear license ? |
| 18:48.25 | nschle85|2 | s/wat/want/ |
| 18:49.14 | bluelightning | nschle85|2: there is no way without modifying insane.bbclass |
| 18:49.28 | bluelightning | it's not something that's good to encourage |
| 18:49.31 | bluelightning | (IMHO) |
| 18:50.50 | nschle85|2 | bluelightning: useing the wrong license instead of no license is also bad :-) |
| 18:51.26 | nschle85|2 | bluelightning: but anyway thank you :-) |
| 18:51.57 | bluelightning | nschle85|2: it's not the wrong license, you're just getting no protection from the checksum |
| 18:52.04 | bluelightning | but that's the fault of the upstream author |
| 18:52.32 | nschle85|2 | bluelightning: i have another question |
| 18:52.40 | bluelightning | doubly negligent considering AFAICT termcap is a gnu project? |
| 18:52.52 | bluelightning | sure |
| 18:54.10 | nschle85|2 | whet i say: bitbake termcap, the termap 1.3.1 is started to build and not 2.0.8, this is the directory i copied: http://cgit.openembedded.org/openembedded/tree/recipes/termcap |
| 18:54.22 | nschle85|2 | s/whet/when/ |
| 18:55.16 | nschle85|2 | why is not 2.0.8 choosen ? |
| 18:55.48 | *** join/#oe pierreghz (~pierreghz@cust-254-120-111-94.dyn.as47377.net) |
| 18:56.48 | nschle85|2 | bluelightning: but my intention is not to have termcap as recipe , my intention is to solve following problem: http://norman-schleicher.de/jenkins/job/shr-core-nokia900-shr-image/36/console |
| 19:22.13 | bluelightning | nschle85|2: er, we do have ncurses... |
| 19:23.58 | cs_nbp | does someone have a distro recipe for 3.1 kernel? I got the kernel 3.1 recipe but I cant even make a config right now-.- |
| 19:24.01 | nschle85|2 | bluelightning: what does it mean ? |
| 19:25.04 | bluelightning | nschle85|2: since this is a native recipe, it looks like it's looking for ncurses-devel on your system and not finding it |
| 19:25.54 | nschle85|2 | bluelightning: how did you find it out ? ? |
| 19:26.29 | bluelightning | nschle85|2: by reading the error message |
| 19:26.49 | bluelightning | nschle85|2: it could be that our until-linux recipe needs to disable ncurses support for -native |
| 19:29.46 | nschle85|2 | bluelightning: as i can see readline needs termcap, where is logical connection to ncurses and util-linux ? |
| 19:29.56 | bluelightning | nschle85|2: further down |
| 19:30.09 | bluelightning | there are multiple failures in this log :( |
| 19:30.42 | bluelightning | for the util-linux one, add this to meta/recipes-core/util-linux/util-linux.inc: |
| 19:30.49 | bluelightning | EXTRA_OECONF_append_virtclass-native = " --without-ncurses" |
| 19:31.02 | bluelightning | (note the leading space) |
| 19:34.17 | bluelightning | hmm this doesn't look right at all... the readline recipe already depends on ncurses |
| 19:34.35 | bluelightning | I don't understand how you could be getting these failures |
| 19:34.39 | nschle85|2 | bluelightning: i installed ncurses-dev on buildhost and all is fine now, hmm but what is the strategy ? fix the errors or depend on inmstalled ncurses-dev ? |
| 19:34.53 | bluelightning | no, fix the errors if you can reproduce them |
| 19:35.15 | bluelightning | we do provide ncurses-native |
| 19:36.00 | nschle85|2 | ah ok i should remove dev dev package and rebuild from scratch |
| 19:36.02 | bluelightning | it could be that it's not often tested on systems without ncurses-dev installed, but that doesn't mean it shouldn't work without it |
| 19:36.38 | bluelightning | nschle85|2: shouldn't need to rebuild from scratch, try removing ncurses-dev then bitbake -c cleansstate ncurses-native readline-native |
| 19:36.50 | bluelightning | then try again, see what happens |
| 19:37.10 | bluelightning | of course that still leaves the python-cython-native error |
| 19:37.14 | nschle85|2 | bluelightning: but broken packages are still build |
| 19:37.27 | bluelightning | nschle85|2: what do you mean? |
| 19:38.33 | nschle85|2 | readline native is still build |
| 19:39.35 | bluelightning | that's why I said run "bitbake -c cleansstate ncurses-native readline-native" |
| 19:39.51 | nschle85|2 | bluelightning: ups, you are right |
| 19:45.23 | nschle85|2 | bluelightning: ok ncurses-dev removed, bitbale -c cleansstate .... done |
| 19:45.33 | nschle85|2 | now starting build again |
| 19:45.47 | bluelightning | nschle85|2: did you do the util-linux fix as well? |
| 19:46.13 | nschle85|2 | bluelightning: no, i wanted to reproduce the problem |
| 19:46.21 | bluelightning | well that's a separate issue |
| 19:46.50 | nschle85|2 | ok then it needs to reproduced too :-) |
| 19:47.04 | nschle85|2 | http://norman-schleicher.de/jenkins/job/shr-core-nokia900-shr-image/38/console |
| 19:47.06 | bluelightning | well it is definitely an issue, the recipe shouldn't be explicitly excluding ncurses from the deps and not also configuring it out |
| 19:48.05 | bluelightning | interesting, have never used jenkins before... cool how you can see live output :) |
| 19:48.24 | bluelightning | ah, I see you are using rm_work |
| 19:49.57 | nschle85|2 | bluelightning: you cannot see all live things.. the steps before builkd i had to make on the unix console, so you cannot follow all id do |
| 19:50.03 | nschle85|2 | all id do |
| 19:50.06 | nschle85|2 | all i do |
| 19:51.23 | nschle85|2 | bluelightning: we have a problem, the build does not stop :-) |
| 19:51.27 | *** join/#oe woglinde (~heinold@f052065100.adsl.alicedsl.de) |
| 19:52.28 | bluelightning | nschle85|2: yes, because the -k option has been specified |
| 19:52.45 | nschle85|2 | yes, ill reconfigure it |
| 19:54.34 | nschle85|2 | http://norman-schleicher.de/jenkins/job/shr-core-nokia900-shr-image/39/console |
| 19:55.54 | nschle85|2 | ok build has stopped |
| 19:56.14 | bluelightning | hmm, still can't find the header... odd |
| 19:56.33 | bluelightning | will run a build here |
| 19:56.56 | nschle85|2 | bluelightning: i did not change any recipe |
| 19:57.02 | bluelightning | notes he had libncurses5-dev installed previously |
| 19:57.06 | bluelightning | nschle85|2: ok |
| 19:57.41 | nschle85|2 | but i wanted to reproduce the readline-native build problem now |
| 19:58.33 | *** join/#oe woglinde (~heinold@f052065100.adsl.alicedsl.de) |
| 19:59.41 | nschle85|2 | si ll do bitbake readline-native in unix console now ok ? |
| 19:59.56 | bluelightning | nschle85|2: yep that should be fine |
| 20:00.22 | cs_nbp | now that I have a bblayers.conf in my build/conf and a layers.conf in my overlay/conf, why does it still refuse to find the overlayed recipes? |
| 20:00.43 | cs_nbp | the layers.conf was shipped |
| 20:01.02 | bluelightning | cs_nbp: the file in your layer/conf should be called "layer.conf" not "layers.conf" |
| 20:01.06 | cs_nbp | the bblayers.conf is the one you find everywhere on the net |
| 20:01.44 | cs_nbp | it actually is i typoed here |
| 20:02.12 | cs_nbp | structure is in reality overlay/meta-machine/conf/layer.conf |
| 20:02.25 | bluelightning | cs_nbp: ok, that's correct |
| 20:02.35 | bluelightning | cs_nbp: bitbake-layers gives you a few tools to view layer information as bitbake sees it |
| 20:02.50 | cs_nbp | ill give that a run |
| 20:02.51 | bluelightning | does bitbake-layers show_layers list your layer? |
| 20:03.02 | nschle85|2 | bluelightning: util-linux stops before building readline-native http://pastebin.com/ZSriLBKm |
| 20:03.38 | bluelightning | nschle85|2: ok, so bitbake -c cleansstate util-linux-native and then apply the fix I mentioned earlier |
| 20:03.55 | *** join/#oe dijenerate (~dijenerat@173.225.251.175) |
| 20:04.05 | *** join/#oe Crofton|work (~balister@pool-96-240-160-175.ronkva.east.verizon.net) |
| 20:04.27 | cs_nbp | a sry i ran bitbake layers without - |
| 20:04.32 | cs_nbp | just a second |
| 20:05.05 | cs_nbp | bitbake-layers: command not found |
| 20:05.11 | nschle85|2 | bluelightning: ok ill do |
| 20:05.23 | bluelightning | cs_nbp: oh, which version of bitbake are you using? |
| 20:05.31 | cs_nbp | 1.10.2 |
| 20:05.42 | bluelightning | cs_nbp: oh right... does that version even support layers? |
| 20:05.47 | bluelightning | I think it might be too old |
| 20:05.56 | cs_nbp | i could change to 1.12 in a sec |
| 20:06.08 | bluelightning | cs_nbp: I think if you want to make use of layers you may have to |
| 20:07.56 | cs_nbp | well it still doesnt know about bitbake-layers |
| 20:08.16 | cs_nbp | should i get the git one? |
| 20:09.06 | nschle85|2 | bluelightning: is the any code convention where to put --disable-** statements ? |
| 20:09.30 | bluelightning | nschle85|2: well, in this case it has to be just for native |
| 20:09.41 | bluelightning | EXTRA_OECONF_append_virtclass-native = " --without-ncurses" |
| 20:09.53 | bluelightning | that's more or less how it would have to be done in this case |
| 20:11.28 | nschle85|2 | bluelightning: now i have to reconfigure jenkins, not to overwrite my changes :-) |
| 20:11.35 | cs_nbp | i got the one from berlios linked in the 'getting started' section |
| 20:11.59 | bluelightning | cs_nbp: hmm, that documentation is probably out of date... |
| 20:12.18 | cs_nbp | so ill git the git |
| 20:12.39 | bluelightning | cs_nbp: I presume you are still using OE-Classic ? if so you'll need to stick to 1.12.x |
| 20:12.49 | nschle85|2 | bluelightning: http://norman-schleicher.de/jenkins/job/shr-core-nokia900-shr-image/40/console |
| 20:12.56 | bluelightning | (which you can always get from the appropriate git tag of course) |
| 20:13.26 | cs_nbp | err classic? i just clone the 'openembedded' from github |
| 20:13.32 | cs_nbp | dunnoh if thats classic |
| 20:14.19 | cs_nbp | perhaps thats why i got problems building for kernel 3.1, too? |
| 20:14.19 | bluelightning | cs_nbp: openembedded from github? do you have the link? |
| 20:14.46 | cs_nbp | git clone git://github.com/openembedded/openembedded.git |
| 20:14.57 | bluelightning | oh right, that's a clone of OE-Classic yes |
| 20:15.14 | bluelightning | which should still be fine but you need to stick to bitbake 1.12.x |
| 20:15.21 | cs_nbp | do I need to move away to build for 3.1? |
| 20:15.30 | cs_nbp | ah ok |
| 20:16.40 | bluelightning | cs_nbp: there's no linux 3.1 recipe in oe-classic no... if you're starting something "new" then I'd recommend making the move to OE-Core now |
| 20:17.30 | cs_nbp | well i havent started it, but Im testing a project thats fairly new and thus only exists as oe-overlay |
| 20:17.31 | *** join/#oe ALoGeNo (~alogeno@27.Red-79-150-44.dynamicIP.rima-tde.net) |
| 20:17.31 | *** join/#oe ALoGeNo (~alogeno@unaffiliated/alogeno) |
| 20:18.04 | cs_nbp | tworaz netbookpro kernel3.1 + bootloader embed code |
| 20:19.59 | bluelightning | cs_nbp: oh neat, didn't know about those layers |
| 20:20.13 | bluelightning | cs_nbp: looking at them I'd guess they are meant to be used with OE-Core already |
| 20:20.19 | cs_nbp | even a sort of jlime |
| 20:20.25 | bluelightning | yes indeed |
| 20:21.25 | bluelightning | maybe I missed it but I did not hear about anyone working on these |
| 20:21.35 | Jay7 | jlime is based on classic OE |
| 20:22.35 | cs_nbp | no its easy to miss theres just one thread on jlime http://jlime.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=6&t=2775&start=150 |
| 20:22.57 | cs_nbp | and the stuff on github google finds when you put nBkProOs.img ^^ |
| 20:23.58 | bluelightning | Jay7: this could be an unofficial layer, it's hard to tell |
| 20:24.30 | Jay7 | I'm on #jlime and never seen there any talks about migration to OE-core :) |
| 20:24.39 | bluelightning | I would be reluctant to list the jlime layer until it's clear that it's official |
| 20:24.51 | Jay7 | even more - I was first one who said about OE-core there :) |
| 20:25.09 | Jay7 | so seems this is unofficial layer really |
| 20:25.33 | bluelightning | Jay7: kristoffer is at least aware of OE-Core, I guess he lacks time |
| 20:25.48 | Jay7 | iirc, jlime was fork of angstrom |
| 20:25.54 | cs_nbp | i'm only getting bitbake-1.5 it seems, and am relatively new to git (used svn so far) |
| 20:26.11 | Jay7 | so.. at least one may fork angstrom again :) |
| 20:26.14 | cs_nbp | is there a way to check out a specific tree? google gives very different responses |
| 20:26.35 | bluelightning | cs_nbp: if you're using OE-Core (and it looks like you should be for this) then you can use git master of bitbake |
| 20:27.18 | *** join/#oe woglinde (~heinold@f052229208.adsl.alicedsl.de) |
| 20:29.02 | cs_nbp | you mean the openembedded/bitbake one? |
| 20:31.06 | *** join/#oe jekhor (~jek@vulture2-nat-43.telecom.by) |
| 20:31.42 | bluelightning | cs_nbp: I mean the very latest master branch of bitbake |
| 20:31.58 | bluelightning | cs_nbp: for OE-Core see http://www.openembedded.org/wiki/OpenEmbedded-Core |
| 20:32.22 | bluelightning | nschle85|2: btw readline-native succeeded here... |
| 20:32.47 | cs_nbp | ah now I get it I was still at oe-classic and bitbake 1.12 mentally .,. |
| 20:33.13 | cs_nbp | that was the 1.15 I got above I think |
| 20:33.16 | cs_nbp | master |
| 20:33.22 | bluelightning | yep |
| 20:34.36 | nschle85|2 | bluelightning: but util-linux did not |
| 20:35.09 | nschle85|2 | bluelightning: hmm i am a little bit confused, because this is what i did not expect |
| 20:36.01 | cs_nbp | oe-core explains everything thats why I got a distroless kernel^^ |
| 20:36.51 | cs_nbp | i guess it boots to initfs? |
| 20:36.57 | cs_nbp | and spawns a rootshell? |
| 20:37.19 | cs_nbp | k back to work -.- |
| 20:38.41 | bluelightning | cs_nbp: I've emailed tworaz to see if I should list those layers |
| 20:40.48 | *** join/#oe jekhor (~jek@vulture2-nat-43.telecom.by) |
| 20:49.07 | otavio | Hello folks. I just created a meta-mozilla layer and it would be nice if people could look at it and help. https://github.com/OSSystems/meta-mozilla |
| 20:55.19 | *** join/#oe rphillips (~rphillips@2001:470:21:31::42dc:59) |
| 20:55.19 | *** join/#oe rphillips (~rphillips@unaffiliated/rphillips) |
| 20:57.25 | *** join/#oe rsalveti (~rsalveti@186.214.58.134) |
| 20:57.25 | *** join/#oe rsalveti (~rsalveti@linaro/rsalveti) |
| 21:36.17 | otavio | 0 |
| 21:38.02 | bluelightning | 1 |
| 21:38.05 | bluelightning | ;) |
| 21:39.26 | otavio | heh |
| 21:39.59 | otavio | Ok; enough for me ... |
| 21:40.06 | otavio | I will be back on Monday |
| 21:40.08 | otavio | see ya |
| 21:50.36 | bluelightning | otavio: bye |
| 22:03.04 | nschle85|2 | bluelightning: sorry i was inwolved in changing shr wiki, what about fixing util-linux-native ? |
| 22:03.15 | nschle85|2 | i have no idea |
| 22:04.41 | *** join/#oe playya__ (~playya@unaffiliated/playya) |
| 22:16.04 | bluelightning | nschle85|2: it would be worth confirming if that --disable-ncurses switch ever made it to the configure command line |
| 22:16.33 | bluelightning | nschle85|2: check the tmp/work/*/util-linux-native-*/temp/log.do_configure |
| 22:17.38 | nschle85|2 | ok ill do |
| 22:20.16 | nschle85|2 | bluelightning: http://norman-schleicher.de/jenkins/job/shr-core-nokia900-shr-image/ws/shr-core/tmp-eglibc/work/x86_64-linux/util-linux-native/util-linux-native-2.20.1-r1/temp/ i have several do configure logs |
| 22:21.19 | nschle85|2 | bluelightning: i guess latest one is linked to the highest number |
| 22:25.17 | nschle85|2 | bluelightning: checking ncurses.h presence... yes checking for ncurses.h... yes checking for initscr in -lncursesw... no checking for initscr in -lncurses... yes checking ncurses/ncurses.h usability... no checking ncurses/ncurses.h presence... no checking for ncurses/ncurses.h... no |
| 22:30.10 | nschle85|2 | did the disable-ncureses flag apply ? |
| 22:35.02 | *** join/#oe GNUtoo|laptop (~gnutoo@host204-5-dynamic.244-95-r.retail.telecomitalia.it) |
| 22:41.29 | nschle85|2 | bluelightning: http://norman-schleicher.de/jenkins/job/shr-core-nokia900-shr-image/ws/openembedded-core/meta/recipes-core/util-linux/ this is my directory |
| 22:41.35 | *** join/#oe cs_nbp|afk (4e5edf67@gateway/web/freenode/ip.78.94.223.103) |
| 23:01.22 | *** join/#oe cbrake (~cbrake@oh-69-34-21-229.sta.embarqhsd.net) |
| 23:08.40 | nschle85|2 | good night bye |
| 23:08.52 | bluelightning | nschle85|2: it shouldn't even be trying to use it |
| 23:08.56 | bluelightning | nschle85|2: cya |
| 23:09.52 | nschle85|2 | bluelightning: i too lazy |
| 23:10.23 | nschle85|2 | iam too lazy , lets talk tomorrow again :-) |
| 23:10.27 | bluelightning | nschle85|2: ok |
| 23:10.27 | nschle85|2 | bye |
| 23:11.19 | nschle85|2 | bye |
| 23:11.27 | bluelightning | cya |
| 23:12.24 | *** join/#oe ant____ (~andrea@host71-253-dynamic.30-79-r.retail.telecomitalia.it) |
| 23:21.15 | GNUtoo|laptop | hmmm |
| 23:21.17 | GNUtoo|laptop | ./alsaloop -P plug:dmix:0 -C plug:dsnoop:1 -S 0 |
| 23:21.23 | GNUtoo|laptop | produces 100% CPU usage too |
| 23:21.30 | GNUtoo|laptop | I worked arround in my code |
| 23:23.11 | *** join/#oe GarthPS (~quassel@qrc29-1-82-245-206-103.fbx.proxad.net) |
| 23:24.36 | GNUtoo|laptop | could it be a bug in the kernel? |
| 23:28.11 | GNUtoo|laptop | strange.... |
| 23:28.35 | GNUtoo|laptop | ./alsaloop -P plughw:0 -C hw:1 -S 0 -f S16_LE -r 8000 -c 1 -t 1000000 works |
| 23:28.43 | GNUtoo|laptop | but the CPU usage is still very high |
| 23:29.15 | GNUtoo|laptop | and it's way higher when not in call |
| 23:30.57 | GNUtoo|laptop | note the ./ |
| 23:31.08 | GNUtoo|laptop | the ./ is the version recompiled with libsamplerate support |
| 23:31.15 | GNUtoo|laptop | libsamplerate is autodetected |
| 23:38.41 | GNUtoo|laptop | mickeyl, hi |
| 23:38.49 | GNUtoo|laptop | hangup blocks |
| 23:38.58 | GNUtoo|laptop | I'll tar the logs |
| 23:39.31 | khem | GNUtoo|laptop: does this use some neon code |
| 23:40.52 | *** join/#oe playya__ (~playya@unaffiliated/playya) |
| 23:40.56 | GNUtoo|laptop | oops wrong channel |
| 23:41.01 | GNUtoo|laptop | khem, hi |
| 23:41.18 | GNUtoo|laptop | khem, let me look |
| 23:42.34 | GNUtoo|laptop | khem, you're talking about the gcc problem I had? |
| 23:42.53 | GNUtoo|laptop | in angstrom I can't compile gcc-cross |
| 23:43.03 | GNUtoo|laptop | for my bug2.0 |
| 23:43.28 | *** join/#oe risca_ (~risca@wnpgmb0412w-ds01-123-237.dynamic.mtsallstream.net) |
| 23:44.23 | GNUtoo|laptop | /home/gnutoo/embedded/oe/oe-core/angstrom/oetmps/angstrom/work-shared/gcc-4.5-r45+svnr181733/gcc-4_5-branch/gcc/cp/cfns.gperf:101:1: error: 'gnu_inline' attribute present on 'libc_name_p' |
| 23:44.26 | GNUtoo|laptop | I'll look |
| 23:45.07 | khem | hmm |
| 23:45.19 | GNUtoo|laptop | the .gperf file seem very strange |
| 23:45.24 | GNUtoo|laptop | I'm not used to its format |
| 23:45.28 | GNUtoo|laptop | it's not code |
| 23:46.12 | GNUtoo|laptop | isalpha is what is at line 101 |
| 23:46.27 | GNUtoo|laptop | I've the issue since a very long time ( I can't remember) |
| 23:46.43 | GNUtoo|laptop | so because of that issue I abandoned working on the bug 2.0 |
| 23:47.04 | khem | somehow your build is deciding to rebuild cfns.h |
| 23:47.15 | GNUtoo|laptop | ah? |
| 23:47.33 | khem | do u have gperf installed ? |
| 23:47.37 | GNUtoo|laptop | where? |
| 23:47.40 | GNUtoo|laptop | on the build system |
| 23:47.43 | GNUtoo|laptop | let me look |
| 23:47.48 | GNUtoo|laptop | yes I do |
| 23:47.54 | GNUtoo|laptop | I'll remove it |
| 23:48.11 | GNUtoo|laptop | under SHR the toolchain work btw |
| 23:48.20 | GNUtoo|laptop | I can rebuild at will, with sstate disabled |
| 23:49.14 | GNUtoo|laptop | I aptitude remove gperf.... |
| 23:49.20 | GNUtoo|laptop | and retry now |
| 23:49.47 | khem | no you dont have to remove it |
| 23:49.55 | GNUtoo|laptop | ok what should I do then? |
| 23:50.20 | khem | it happens everytime ? |
| 23:50.21 | GNUtoo|laptop | anyway there is a gperf-native.... |
| 23:50.23 | GNUtoo|laptop | yes |
| 23:50.28 | GNUtoo|laptop | I tried everyhting |
| 23:50.32 | GNUtoo|laptop | rebuild from scratch |
| 23:50.42 | khem | did you try to delete the tar file |
| 23:50.45 | GNUtoo|laptop | going trough 1 BB_THREAD |
| 23:50.54 | GNUtoo|laptop | what tar file? |
| 23:50.56 | khem | in DL_DIR |
| 23:50.57 | GNUtoo|laptop | the sstate file? |
| 23:50.58 | GNUtoo|laptop | no |
| 23:51.00 | GNUtoo|laptop | I didn't |
| 23:51.13 | GNUtoo|laptop | I'll move them |
| 23:51.18 | khem | ok my guess is somehow the gcc sources are corrupted |
| 23:51.33 | khem | and since there are no checksums for scm based recipes |
| 23:51.37 | khem | they dont get checked |
| 23:51.53 | GNUtoo|laptop | it could be |
| 23:51.55 | khem | so remove the tar file |
| 23:51.57 | GNUtoo|laptop | it's very probable |
| 23:51.58 | GNUtoo|laptop | ok |
| 23:52.07 | khem | as well as the gcc checkout under dL_DIR/svn |
| 23:52.12 | GNUtoo|laptop | ok |
| 23:52.15 | GNUtoo|laptop | thanks a lot!!!! |
| 23:52.19 | khem | then retry |