| 00:31.28 | CIA-27 | 03bzhou * r10829 10optware/trunk/make/zile.mk: zile: reverted to 2.3.12 |
| 01:17.57 | *** join/#nslu2-linux james_walmsley_U (n=JamesWal@client-86-25-247-137.sdn-bng-011.adsl.virginmedia.net) |
| 04:17.52 | *** join/#nslu2-linux Sinclair73de_ (n=Sinclair@krlh-5f72d418.pool.mediaWays.net) |
| 04:32.01 | CIA-27 | 03bzhou * r10830 10optware/trunk/make/zile.mk: zile: 2.3.12 -> 2.3.13, again |
| 06:23.13 | *** join/#nslu2-linux carterb (n=__@e179102133.adsl.alicedsl.de) |
| 06:40.56 | *** join/#nslu2-linux VoodooZ (n=palm3@76-10-166-127.dsl.teksavvy.com) |
| 06:52.10 | *** join/#nslu2-linux mithro (n=tim@unaffiliated/mithro) |
| 07:39.40 | *** join/#nslu2-linux mithro (n=tim@unaffiliated/mithro) |
| 07:47.19 | *** join/#nslu2-linux jomaster (n=jomaster@f053083189.adsl.alicedsl.de) |
| 07:54.03 | *** join/#nslu2-linux carterb (n=__@f049117022.adsl.alicedsl.de) |
| 07:57.03 | *** join/#nslu2-linux carterb (n=__@f049117022.adsl.alicedsl.de) |
| 08:08.41 | *** join/#nslu2-linux RedT0mt0m (n=tomtom@bro67-2-82-227-110-8.fbx.proxad.net) |
| 08:23.42 | *** join/#nslu2-linux tonymy01_ (n=Tony@114.78.119.69) |
| 09:41.37 | *** join/#nslu2-linux tonymy01_ (n=Tony@114.78.119.69) |
| 10:02.50 | *** join/#nslu2-linux kolla (i=kolla@haugum.uninett.no) |
| 10:33.55 | *** join/#nslu2-linux RedT0mt0m (n=tomtom@bro67-2-82-227-110-8.fbx.proxad.net) |
| 11:08.23 | jomaster | hi eno, i have some questions to some optware-packages and vt4-toolchain (perhaps more packages run for vt4-device) |
| 11:13.10 | *** join/#nslu2-linux Reedy (n=reedy@wikimedia/pdpc.active.reedy) |
| 13:28.57 | *** join/#nslu2-linux Reedy (n=reedy@wikimedia/pdpc.active.reedy) |
| 14:02.49 | *** join/#nslu2-linux GPSFan (n=kenm@64.92.145.112) |
| 16:13.46 | *** join/#nslu2-linux Reedy (n=Reedy@wikimedia/pdpc.active.reedy) |
| 16:32.23 | *** join/#nslu2-linux mithro (n=tim@unaffiliated/mithro) |
| 16:35.28 | jomaster | @eno: are you there? |
| 16:39.12 | eno | jomaster: yes |
| 16:39.36 | jomaster | nice |
| 16:41.56 | jomaster | at toolchain-vt4.mk - .unpacked-target: libdl will be copied to staging-dir. isn't it better to add TARGET_LIBDIR to TARGET_LDFLAGS? |
| 16:44.34 | eno | probably yes |
| 16:45.18 | eno | but usually the toolchain should be self-contained already |
| 16:45.32 | eno | and no need to add additional -l -L flags |
| 16:46.19 | eno | either way is just work around |
| 16:46.36 | jomaster | toolchain don't recognize this libs-during build. |
| 16:46.43 | jomaster | thats why this cp |
| 16:47.18 | jomaster | if i add a cp vor libpthread also apache build fine |
| 16:47.49 | jomaster | perhaps more packages work, if we copy this libs or add flags. |
| 16:48.22 | eno | i mean lib{dl,libpthread}*so* should be in a subdir of toolchain that it can find without -l or -L |
| 16:48.49 | eno | probably add flags is a better workaround |
| 16:48.50 | jomaster | but apache-build don't found libpthread |
| 16:49.18 | eno | it's a toolchain problem |
| 16:49.53 | *** join/#nslu2-linux encryptedbytes (n=NSLU2-IR@75-129-157-62.static.fdul.wi.charter.com) |
| 16:50.13 | eno | ideally it should be fixed within toolchain build |
| 16:50.35 | eno | but for now, I agree adding flags may be a better workaround |
| 16:51.08 | encryptedbytes | Hey all, I'm trying to resolve a power issue with a NSLU2, anyone help? |
| 16:51.53 | jomaster | "TARGET_LDFLAGS = -L$(TARGET_LIBDIR) -Wl,-rpath-link,$(TARGET_LIBDIR)" ? |
| 16:52.21 | jomaster | "TARGET_CUSTOM_FLAGS= -pipe -I$(TARGET_INCDIR)" ? |
| 16:52.30 | jomaster | toolchain is a binary |
| 16:52.41 | encryptedbytes | No one alive in #nslu2-general... |
| 16:53.11 | eno | jomaster: somebody built that toolchain binary |
| 16:53.25 | jomaster | :-D |
| 16:53.42 | eno | and the biggest problem of vt4 toolchain IIRC is the lack of shared libstdc++ |
| 16:53.45 | jomaster | flags ok? i don't know such thinks |
| 16:55.08 | jomaster | ah, i wondered why no libstdc++ needed :-D |
| 16:55.27 | encryptedbytes | sorry to bother, have a good one |
| 16:55.29 | *** part/#nslu2-linux encryptedbytes (n=NSLU2-IR@75-129-157-62.static.fdul.wi.charter.com) |
| 16:55.39 | eno | jomaster: I'm checking |
| 16:55.50 | eno | looks reasonable |
| 16:56.25 | eno | lack of libstdc++ .so is the reason why vt4 has so many BROKEN_PACKAGES |
| 16:56.42 | jomaster | ok, if do some checks you should add this flags. |
| 16:57.07 | jomaster | why no openldap for vt4? for me it builds without an error |
| 16:57.07 | eno | you can go ahead add the flags |
| 16:57.15 | jomaster | ok |
| 16:57.46 | eno | i spent way more time demoting packages for vt4 already |
| 16:58.49 | eno | i don't want to be vt4 maintainer when I don't even have vt4 device |
| 17:08.40 | CIA-27 | 03jomaster * r10831 10optware/trunk/platforms/toolchain-vt4.mk: toolchain-vt4: workaround for lib-dir (add TARGET_LDFLAGS) |
| 17:23.10 | eno | jomaster: i was doing a test build, and ncurses build is broken with your latest change |
| 17:23.41 | eno | i suspect that there's old version of ncurses in TARGET_LIBDIR |
| 17:24.13 | eno | there is |
| 17:25.36 | eno | renaming it to see if that helps |
| 17:26.11 | eno | the toolchain is not complete and not clean |
| 17:27.02 | eno | yes, that helped |
| 17:27.27 | *** join/#nslu2-linux encryptedbytes (n=NSLU2-IR@75-129-157-62.static.fdul.wi.charter.com) |
| 17:33.25 | eno | jomaster: apache builds finished fine |
| 17:33.33 | eno | with that change |
| 17:33.56 | eno | OTOH, you probably want to delete/rename those non-core libs |
| 17:34.35 | eno | such as libjpeg, libpng, libtorrent, libuuid, libz |
| 17:34.55 | eno | libtorrent definitely has no business in toolchain |
| 17:50.33 | *** join/#nslu2-linux james_walmsley_U (n=JamesWal@client-81-97-130-176.sdn-bng-011.adsl.virginmedia.net) |
| 17:51.19 | james_walmsley_U | Hi I managed to compile and boot kernel 2.6.16 using the information provided here http://peter.korsgaard.com/articles/debian-nslu2.php |
| 17:52.30 | james_walmsley_U | I've tried to manually patch the latest kernel, by looking at the patch file the slugos used back then, however things seem to have changed a bit |
| 17:52.50 | james_walmsley_U | has anyone compiled 2.6.3x kernels for NSLU2? |
| 18:07.44 | *** join/#nslu2-linux Reedy (n=Reedy@adsl-87-102-33-94.karoo.KCOM.COM) |
| 18:22.11 | eno | Hi Reedy |
| 18:23.15 | Reedy | Hey eno |
| 18:23.58 | eno | i upgraded to 9.10 last night, and could build nslu2/toolchain |
| 18:24.13 | eno | as long as you symlink /usr/bin/gcc to gcc-3.3 |
| 18:24.49 | Reedy | Ahhh |
| 18:24.56 | eno | an attempt was made to use the default gcc-4.4 as HOST_CC |
| 18:25.10 | Reedy | I did poke about with that, but it "seemed" right, to someone unfamiliar |
| 18:25.26 | eno | i got over the first hurdle, but failed aferwards |
| 18:25.32 | Reedy | lol |
| 18:27.01 | Reedy | Hmm, would be worth nothing that in the wiki then about gcc |
| 18:27.14 | jomaster | ok, i do |
| 18:27.33 | eno | right, could you test and edit the wiki please |
| 18:31.30 | Reedy | me? |
| 18:32.16 | Reedy | i'll have to do it later, gotta go out when i've eaten |
| 18:32.22 | Reedy | but i did upgrade to 9.10 also last night |
| 18:32.39 | eno | k, no hurry |
| 18:33.06 | Reedy | be good if we can get it updated for others though |
| 18:34.06 | eno | which wiki page were you following? |
| 18:34.24 | eno | jomaster: did you update some wiki already? |
| 18:34.29 | jomaster | @eno: also libcrypto? |
| 18:35.31 | eno | jomaster: right, that's part of openssl |
| 18:36.14 | jomaster | then also libssl. thats all? i'am not too familiar with the libs |
| 18:46.28 | eno | jomaster: yes, although i'm not too sure whether that's all |
| 18:47.22 | eno | libcurl too |
| 18:47.34 | eno | libid3tag |
| 18:49.27 | eno | now I know why we copied instead of adding -L |
| 18:50.38 | jomaster | better copy? |
| 18:51.56 | jomaster | why openldap is demoted? for me it works without new workaround too? |
| 18:54.42 | eno | jomaster: i don't remember |
| 18:54.52 | jomaster | ok |
| 18:55.05 | eno | you can take the approach of promoted it in platforms/packages-vt4.mk |
| 18:55.16 | eno | and see if it builds on builder |
| 18:55.33 | eno | watch http://logs.nslu2-linux.org/buildlogs/ |
| 18:56.04 | jomaster | another question to mysql5: why confirure-target don't depends on mysql5-hostbuild, but as mysql-package the build target need the hostbuild? |
| 18:57.57 | *** join/#nslu2-linux carterb (n=__@f049117022.adsl.alicedsl.de) |
| 18:58.02 | eno | in mysql4, later version we used gen_lex_hash and comp_err from host build |
| 18:58.12 | eno | not sure about mysql5 |
| 18:58.23 | eno | haven't touched it for a while |
| 18:58.41 | eno | it would be nice to upgrade to mysql5 |
| 18:59.35 | eno | if you're using git-svn, you can create a separate branch for experiment |
| 19:03.34 | eno | jomaster: the host build was added between 4.1.20 to 4.1.22 |
| 19:04.18 | jomaster | i think it is still need for mysql build |
| 19:05.07 | eno | mysql5.mk was probably before 4.1.22 |
| 19:05.21 | eno | feel free to add host build to mysql5 |
| 19:07.22 | jomaster | i will create a branch after finishing my firmware-build-system. still same weeks of work... |
| 19:13.14 | eno | openldap builds fine on a devel machine |
| 19:17.33 | carterb | eno? |
| 19:18.12 | carterb | sane-backends - 1.0.20+git20091022-1 - SANE is a universal scanner interface |
| 19:18.13 | carterb | sane-backends - 1.0.20+git20090927-4 - |
| 19:18.27 | carterb | Thats what I saw on optware server |
| 19:20.53 | carterb | why there are two versions |
| 20:13.09 | eno | carterb: you installed an ipk from file |
| 20:13.20 | eno | so one is from feed, one from file |
| 20:13.58 | carterb | i did a "ipkg list | grep "sane" |
| 20:13.58 | eno | the latter one (from file) does not have associated meta info |
| 20:14.40 | eno | this is your local ipkg's knowledge of available sane-backends packages |
| 20:15.06 | carterb | ah, no its ok |
| 20:15.24 | eno | if you create an index (Package*) of your local builds |
| 20:15.25 | carterb | now |
| 20:15.28 | carterb | i mean |
| 20:15.30 | carterb | sorry |
| 20:15.55 | carterb | Can we update ejabberd to 2.1.0-rc2 |
| 20:15.55 | eno | then there will be two entries, both with description |
| 20:16.02 | carterb | http://www.ejabberd.im/ |
| 20:16.25 | eno | we usually don't do snapshot or rc |
| 20:16.35 | eno | but there can be exceptions |
| 20:17.05 | carterb | ok, I do not get the ejabberd 2.0.5 running with erlang 13 |
| 20:17.16 | carterb | also not with erlang 12;-) |
| 20:17.29 | eno | sometimes the version number can be a problem too |
| 20:17.32 | carterb | but ejabberd rc2 with rc2 works |
| 20:17.54 | eno | ipkg is not smart enought to tell 2.1.0-rc2 < 2.1.0 |
| 20:18.12 | carterb | ok |
| 20:18.49 | carterb | sorry, I am writung shit |
| 20:19.05 | eno | do you know when 2.1.0 is gonna be released? |
| 20:19.28 | carterb | "but ejabberd rc2 with rc2 works" shoul be with erlang 13 |
| 20:19.31 | carterb | close to final |
| 20:19.32 | eno | for your own usage, you now know how to build any version |
| 20:19.37 | carterb | whatever that means |
| 20:19.46 | carterb | I will take a look at the homepage |
| 20:20.23 | carterb | "If no critical bugs are found, ejabberd 2.1.0 final may be released in one week" |
| 20:20.29 | carterb | Should we wait |
| 20:20.36 | eno | yes, good idea |
| 20:20.42 | carterb | kk |
| 20:20.46 | eno | thanks for testing |
| 20:20.49 | carterb | post was from 2009-10-20 |
| 20:20.55 | carterb | should be ready soon |
| 20:21.06 | eno | feel free to take over MAINTAINER |
| 20:21.10 | carterb | I'll have a look at the page |
| 20:21.44 | carterb | Yes, When final is released, I'll bump it and take over maintainer |
| 20:23.42 | eno | i often use separate git branch for different package |
| 20:24.09 | eno | highly recommend to use git-svn |
| 20:24.19 | eno | as svn client |
| 20:24.28 | carterb | I do not understand |
| 20:24.33 | carterb | why do you do so |
| 20:24.47 | eno | git is more powerful than svn |
| 20:24.54 | carterb | whats meant by "branche" |
| 20:25.17 | eno | separate line of development |
| 20:25.19 | carterb | can I do all the things you told me about svn, alo with git |
| 20:25.28 | eno | yes, and more |
| 20:25.42 | eno | e.g., you can have a sane-backends-branch |
| 20:25.52 | carterb | ok, I think I have to read some more guidlines |
| 20:25.56 | eno | and an ejabberd-2.1.0 branch |
| 20:26.51 | carterb | I'll do my best to get involved ;-) |
| 20:26.55 | carterb | So far, in Germany we have 21.20, time to go out with my girlfriend and have some fine cocktails. |
| 20:26.58 | eno | great |
| 20:27.07 | eno | have fun |
| 20:27.17 | carterb | thx, bye |
| 20:27.24 | eno | bye |
| 20:36.30 | CIA-27 | 03bzhou * r10832 10optware/trunk/make/py-cheetah.mk: py-cheetah: 2.2.2 -> 2.4.0 |
| 20:39.38 | jomaster | @eno: libc-dev package use rsync. is this really necessary? |
| 20:41.14 | eno | it's convenient, we have rsync on official build machine any way |
| 20:41.29 | eno | if you want to replace it with cp, fine with me |
| 20:42.00 | eno | but libc-dev is shared with a couple of other platforms |
| 20:42.11 | eno | don't break other platforms |
| 20:42.35 | jomaster | perhaps tomorrow. apache and all depending packages builds fine with workaround. |
| 20:43.36 | eno | personally i'd leave rsync |
| 20:43.56 | eno | alone |
| 20:44.52 | jomaster | i don't like too much required tools at my build-system so i will remove it and do same for optware when it works. |
| 20:46.03 | eno | there're quite some symlinks that you need to make sure do not get copied over as another copy |
| 20:46.27 | eno | what linux box does not have rsync? |
| 20:46.48 | eno | now that I think of it, I strongly prefer to keep rsync |
| 20:47.11 | jomaster | :-D |
| 20:47.25 | eno | i remember reading man page of cp, and it was not obvious to do what I want |
| 20:47.45 | eno | it's working, let's not fix it |
| 20:47.47 | jomaster | yeah, it is great but just another depending. |
| 20:48.13 | eno | rsync is good tool |
| 20:48.54 | eno | i maybe able to simulate that with tar and untar |
| 20:49.03 | eno | but i did not want to bother |
| 20:51.42 | jomaster | ok, for my build-system i like to build all required tools by myself as openwrt do. this prevent build errors. |
| 20:52.04 | jomaster | but this will implemented as last step. |
| 20:54.30 | eno | sure, I understand |
| 21:01.17 | jomaster | e.g. if i package require automake1.9 and it is missing, only a warning is printed and build continue. |
| 21:08.59 | *** join/#nslu2-linux kizoku_ (n=albus@cm-84.215.21.116.getinternet.no) |
| 22:16.20 | *** join/#nslu2-linux Sinclair73de (n=Sinclair@krlh-5f72d418.pool.mediaWays.net) |
| 22:43.26 | *** join/#nslu2-linux eno (n=eno@nslu2-linux/eno) |
| 23:37.44 | *** join/#nslu2-linux hillct (n=hillct@cpe-069-134-049-165.nc.res.rr.com) |
| 23:43.13 | jomaster | good night. it's late here... |
| 23:50.44 | *** join/#nslu2-linux hillct (n=hillct@cpe-069-134-049-165.nc.res.rr.com) |