IRC log for #maemo-ssu on 20130829

02:23.05*** join/#maemo-ssu amiconn_ (amiconn@rockbox/developer/amiconn)
04:52.11*** join/#maemo-ssu freemangordon_ (~freemango@213.137.35.49)
05:50.22*** join/#maemo-ssu dhbiker (~dhbiker@APN-123-85-165-gprs.simobil.net)
06:06.38FatPhilIs there a utility to turn my n900 into a (USB) keyboard for a PC?
06:31.55freemangordon_nothing for USB afaik, but I gess you can use some X tools to do some forwarding
06:42.54FatPhilthat's a same, it would make adminning my servers in a closet easier - wouldn't need real keyboard/kvm in there!
06:54.09DocScrutinizer05errr not for USB, indeed
06:54.17DocScrutinizer05but there is bluemaemo
06:54.43DocScrutinizer05amazing that this name passed the censorship
06:55.42DocScrutinizer05apropos, we might have to rename the whole thing, due to [TM] reasons. How's about meano
06:56.41FatPhilmaen-all-maen?
06:57.07DocScrutinizer05interesting
06:57.32DocScrutinizer05manno
06:57.33FatPhilourmo?
06:57.40DocScrutinizer05mameo
06:58.49DocScrutinizer05I guess I lack the northern lingual background for ourmo etc
06:58.53FatPhilthat would remind Finns of mämmi
06:59.31FatPhilWell, "maemo" was pronounced "my mo", so "our mo" or "mine all mine"
06:59.42DocScrutinizer05aaah
06:59.44DocScrutinizer05:-)
06:59.51freemangordonFatPhil: do you know maemo-certman guy?
07:00.29FatPhilnope, rarely saw anything outside kernel group. security group was very private
07:00.37freemangordonwe have a severe bug I'd love to have support from someone knowing the code while fixing it
07:00.39freemangordonoh
07:01.14DocScrutinizer05write a ticket! ;-P
07:01.23freemangordonDocScrutinizer05: to myself? hehe
07:01.47*** join/#maemo-ssu unclouded (~neil@2001:4428:200:80fc:605c:d4e8:5967:f600)
07:01.48freemangordonDocScrutinizer05: explanations for supl.nokia.com problem http://talk.maemo.org/showpost.php?p=1370304&postcount=122
07:01.54DocScrutinizer05mhm
07:03.53FatPhilis maemo-certman open source?
07:04.00freemangordonsure
07:04.04FatPhilphew!
07:04.13FatPhilyou never can tell
07:04.23freemangordonwell, it wasn't :D
07:04.57freemangordonsomehow nokia guys managed to opensource it at 11:59
07:05.36freemangordonat/on? nevermind
07:06.13FatPhilat a time, on a date
07:07.30freemangordonthanks :)
07:08.10FatPhilwhat toolchain are you using for compiling luserspace?
07:08.51freemangordon4.2.1 (stock SDK) or 4.7.2 (for cssu-thumb)
07:08.53FatPhilI notice my (meego) scratchbox has got cs2009q3-eglibc2.10-armv7-hard  and linaro4.5-eglibc2.12-armv7-hard already installed
07:09.05freemangordonsoftfp only
07:09.28freemangordonthose with eglibc2.5 in the names
07:09.52FatPhilI must have purged those
07:10.05freemangordonhttp://wiki.maemo.org/Documentation/Maemo_5_Final_SDK_Installation
07:10.26freemangordonthough I think going to hathor is not a very good idea
07:11.12FatPhilnever even heard of hathor
07:11.44freemangordonoh, sure you did if you have scratchbox installed :)
07:12.57FatPhilhonestly, I've never seen those 6 letters in that order before
07:13.58freemangordonhttp://www.scratchbox.org/download/scratchbox-hathor/
07:14.46freemangordonor http://www.scratchbox.org/download/files/sbox-releases/hathor/deb/amd64/ even
07:15.07freemangordonyour toolchain is there :)
07:15.36freemangordonthough I wonder where did you get linaro4.5 from
07:17.02FatPhilah, so it's jsut a version name?
07:17.15freemangordonyep, the release name
07:18.05freemangordonthe original one for Fremantle is apophis iiuc
07:20.13FatPhilii  scratchbox-core                                      1.0.24                       Scratchbox base system
07:20.40FatPhilwe did briefly play with scratchbox 2, I wonder if that was hathor
07:21.04FatPhilthere were some issues with it so we were told to stick to scratchbox 1
07:21.06freemangordonmost probably
07:21.31freemangordonor not, no idea
07:21.46FatPhilscratchbox 2 was a million times more intuitive, I haven't got a clue where I am with scratchbox 1
07:22.14FatPhilhence compiling powertop just using the crosscompiler directly outside scratchbox
07:22.34freemangordonyou lost me there, what is the problem with dpkg-buildpackge? or make -j4
07:22.39DocScrutinizer05wut? you have the maemo powertop?
07:22.47*** join/#maemo-ssu Vlad_on_the_road (~Vlad_on_t@ip-66.net-82-216-1.versailles2.rev.numericable.fr)
07:22.51freemangordonpowertop compiles just fine in SB, with a sinple make
07:22.56freemangordon*simple
07:23.12DocScrutinizer05well, not *our* powertop, ehß
07:23.14DocScrutinizer05?
07:23.37*** join/#maemo-ssu LauRoman (~LauRoman@5-14-93-219.residential.rdsnet.ro)
07:23.52DocScrutinizer05I got told that maemo's powertop is a nokia blob
07:23.52freemangordonDocScrutinizer05: it seems "our" powertop is GPL
07:24.12freemangordonbut I'll leave FatPhil to comment on that :)
07:24.21FatPhilmy scratchbox is apparently hathor: Filename: dists/hathor-r1/main/binary-i386/scratchbox-core_1.0.24_i386.deb
07:24.30DocScrutinizer05otherwise, why nobody fixed that friggin thing to not show BS on KP
07:25.07freemangordonDocScrutinizer05: do you have the source code of "our" powertop? me neither
07:25.21DocScrutinizer05you leave me puzzled
07:25.36DocScrutinizer05[2013-08-29 09:23:52] <freemangordon> DocScrutinizer05: it seems "our" powertop is GPL
07:25.36FatPhilfreemangordon: I will check the n9's powertop over the weekend, and give you a *guaranteed safe* code drop immediately afterwards.
07:25.37freemangordon10:24 <freemangordon> but I'll leave FatPhil to comment on that :)
07:25.47freemangordonDocScrutinizer05: ^^^
07:26.29DocScrutinizer05heads out
07:26.31DocScrutinizer05too late
07:26.33freemangordonFatPhil: hmm, is it really a good idea? I bet there are some differences because of 2636 vs 3430 and because of the newer kernel
07:26.56freemangordonshit
07:27.01freemangordon3630 vs 3430
07:27.18FatPhilThe code-base is basically the same - the kernel API didn't change.
07:27.24FatPhilAll the info comes from proc/sysfs files
07:27.35DocScrutinizer05:nod:
07:28.03freemangordonok, won't argue :)
07:28.40freemangordonanyway, have to run, bbl
07:29.14FatPhilSo I'll give you the n900 GPL release, a patch to take that to the n9 release, also GPL. Nokia should have done this already, I wonder why they didn't?
07:29.36freemangordongreat
07:32.13DocScrutinizer05Nokia had to employ 17 lawyers to check if the GPL remark is actually correct, before handing out any source
07:33.18DocScrutinizer05after all somebody could have edited the source and used a TM-threatened variable name
07:34.09DocScrutinizer05ot the edit been done by a subcontractor
07:34.13DocScrutinizer05or*
07:34.47DocScrutinizer05then you need to check the contracts first, to see if Nokia may release that code at all
07:35.51DocScrutinizer05at ST-E I would've needed a special security audit to touch the Nokia projects
07:36.30DocScrutinizer05Hell, Nokia been ST-E *customer*
07:37.06DocScrutinizer05luckily I wasn't involved in any Nokia related stuff
07:42.45DocScrutinizer05anyway, for defeating a GPL complaint you need only one lawyer, for checking code to satisfy the complaint you need 17. Guess what the managers decide to do
08:03.29*** join/#maemo-ssu kolp (~quassel@212.255.240.195)
08:04.34*** join/#maemo-ssu FlameReaper (~assassin@183.171.174.153)
08:10.44*** join/#maemo-ssu Vlad_on_the_road (~Vlad_on_t@ip-66.net-82-216-1.versailles2.rev.numericable.fr)
08:15.31*** join/#maemo-ssu raccoon_ (user@ghs/raccoon)
08:20.41*** join/#maemo-ssu FlameReaper (~assassin@183.171.174.153)
08:23.34*** join/#maemo-ssu LaoLang_cool (~LaoLang_c@113.117.189.147)
08:37.25*** join/#maemo-ssu xes (~xes@unaffiliated/xes)
08:42.06*** join/#maemo-ssu Vlad_on_the_road (~Vlad_on_t@ip-66.net-82-216-1.versailles2.rev.numericable.fr)
09:15.37*** join/#maemo-ssu Martix_ (~martix@static-84-242-103-180.net.upcbroadband.cz)
09:27.47*** join/#maemo-ssu M4rtinK (~M4rtinK@ip-89-177-125-57.net.upcbroadband.cz)
09:33.27*** join/#maemo-ssu FReaper (~assassin@203.106.65.160)
09:35.47*** join/#maemo-ssu dhbiker (~dhbiker@95.87.145.172)
09:37.48FatPhilhahah - looks like powertop was put in non-free!
09:37.57FatPhilWho wants to call teh GPL violations project ;-)
10:10.14*** join/#maemo-ssu Martix (~martix@static-84-242-103-180.net.upcbroadband.cz)
10:14.49*** join/#maemo-ssu Martix_ (~martix@static-84-242-103-180.net.upcbroadband.cz)
10:44.49*** join/#maemo-ssu Pali (~pali@Maemo/community/contributor/Pali)
11:17.38*** join/#maemo-ssu xes (~xes@unaffiliated/xes)
11:35.55*** join/#maemo-ssu povbot (~supybot@office.pov.lt)
11:35.58*** mode/#maemo-ssu [+v povbot] by ChanServ
11:47.03*** join/#maemo-ssu jon_y (~enforcer@2002:af8e:4df8::af8e:4df8)
11:55.57*** join/#maemo-ssu dhbiker (~dhbiker@193.2.218.150)
12:39.53*** join/#maemo-ssu arcean (~arcean@aacv201.neoplus.adsl.tpnet.pl)
12:57.58*** join/#maemo-ssu M4rtinK (~M4rtinK@ip-89-177-125-57.net.upcbroadband.cz)
13:27.19*** join/#maemo-ssu dhbiker (~dhbiker@193.2.218.150)
13:53.41*** join/#maemo-ssu NIN101 (~NIN@p57B9E41C.dip0.t-ipconnect.de)
16:11.19*** join/#maemo-ssu xes (~xes@unaffiliated/xes)
16:26.01*** join/#maemo-ssu dos11 (~dos@unaffiliated/dos1)
16:42.14*** join/#maemo-ssu BCMM (~BCMM@unaffiliated/bcmm)
17:42.22ShadowJKIt's a different powertop
17:43.04ShadowJKThe lesswatts.org powertop looks completely different, and doesn't give nearly as useful information
17:50.28*** join/#maemo-ssu Vlad_on_the_road (~Vlad_on_t@ip-66.net-82-216-1.versailles2.rev.numericable.fr)
18:20.58*** join/#maemo-ssu BCMM (~BCMM@unaffiliated/bcmm)
18:49.48*** join/#maemo-ssu ototo (~ototo@linaro/ototo)
19:03.40DocScrutinizer05ShadowJK: that's exactly what I thought as well
19:04.08DocScrutinizer05lesswatts powertop is largely useless
19:04.40DocScrutinizer05afaik
19:08.13DocScrutinizer05Powertop 1.13.3   /sys/kernel/debug/pm_debug/time   Mounting debugfs   mount -t debugfs nodev /sys/kernel/debug   /sys/devices/platform/serial8250.0/sleep_timeout   Restarting PMTrackerd etcpp
19:10.52DocScrutinizer05CORTEX-A8   aeabi   HSOTGUSB_IDLE   @OMAPCTRL
19:11.22DocScrutinizer05^^ strings from "our" powertop
19:32.09*** join/#maemo-ssu dafox (~dafox@88.128.80.6)
20:18.40*** join/#maemo-ssu dhbiker (~dhbiker@95.87.145.172)
20:31.57*** join/#maemo-ssu freemangordon (~freemango@213.137.35.49)
20:44.40*** join/#maemo-ssu tom___ (~tom@66.172.11.27)
20:47.22*** join/#maemo-ssu tom___ (~tom@66.172.11.27)
20:54.08*** join/#maemo-ssu dafox (~dafox@ip51cc571d.speed.planet.nl)
21:00.30*** join/#maemo-ssu nox- (noident@freebsd/developer/nox)
21:26.53*** join/#maemo-ssu Martix (~martix@cst-prg-51-21.cust.vodafone.cz)
21:54.16*** join/#maemo-ssu Martix (~martix@cst-prg-8-15.cust.vodafone.cz)
22:18.31*** join/#maemo-ssu Martix (~martix@cst-prg-8-15.cust.vodafone.cz)
22:31.29*** join/#maemo-ssu DrCode (~DrCode@gateway/tor-sasl/drcode)
22:45.22FatPhilANyone looked at ondemand-avoid.diff recently. I know it's marked as 'N' for CSSU inclusion, but the reason is only marked as it breaking powertop. Hopefully we can fix powertop issues...
22:47.22*** join/#maemo-ssu peetah (~peetah@cha92-9-82-236-202-86.fbx.proxad.net)
22:58.24FatPhilnope, I don't like that patch at all. Someone remind me to revisit it...
23:27.07FatPhildon't like overclock.diff

Generated by irclog2html.pl Modified by Tim Riker to work with infobot.