00:30.26 | *** join/#maemo-ssu MohammadAG (~MohammadA@Maemo/community/contributor/MohammadAG) |
00:50.13 | *** join/#maemo-ssu LaoLang_cool (~LaoLang_c@14.151.29.168) |
01:39.16 | *** join/#maemo-ssu LauRoman (~LauRoman@5-14-92-176.residential.rdsnet.ro) |
02:26.17 | *** join/#maemo-ssu M13 (~Miranda@83.149.38.164) |
02:58.23 | *** join/#maemo-ssu amiconn_ (quassel@rockbox/developer/amiconn) |
03:03.36 | *** join/#maemo-ssu DocScrutinizer06 (~HaleBopp@openmoko/engineers/joerg) |
04:44.44 | *** join/#maemo-ssu gregoa (~gregoa@colleen.colgarra.priv.at) |
05:30.13 | *** join/#maemo-ssu sunny_s (~sunny_s@business-092-079-020-027.static.arcor-ip.net) |
05:41.48 | *** join/#maemo-ssu Pali (~pali@Maemo/community/contributor/Pali) |
05:50.27 | *** join/#maemo-ssu dhbiker (~dhbiker@95.87.145.172) |
06:08.46 | *** join/#maemo-ssu LaoLang_cool (~LaoLang_c@14.151.29.168) |
06:22.12 | *** join/#maemo-ssu freemangordon (~freemango@130-204-50-168.2074221835.ddns.cablebg.net) |
07:52.54 | *** join/#maemo-ssu sunny_s (~sunny_s@business-092-079-020-027.static.arcor-ip.net) |
08:37.26 | *** join/#maemo-ssu tg (~irc@2001:738:2001:2078:0:215:11:82) |
08:48.15 | *** join/#maemo-ssu tom_ (~tom@66.172.11.27) |
09:10.54 | *** join/#maemo-ssu M4rtinK (~M4rtinK@mail.melf.eu) |
09:38.13 | *** join/#maemo-ssu daveyoung (dave@nat/redhat/x-opadxjqlmrbskdaw) |
09:51.13 | *** join/#maemo-ssu futpib (~futpib@89.106.197.59) |
09:57.44 | merlin1991 | ffs linux serial system drives me mental |
09:57.56 | merlin1991 | can't get a simple blocking read for x chars running |
10:02.57 | *** join/#maemo-ssu arcean (~arcean@aafq163.neoplus.adsl.tpnet.pl) |
10:04.13 | *** join/#maemo-ssu kolp (~quassel@212.255.226.66) |
10:04.39 | ShadowJK | you're getting them one by one? |
10:14.44 | *** join/#maemo-ssu futpib (~futpib@89.106.197.59) |
10:15.53 | *** join/#maemo-ssu futpib (~futpib@89.106.197.59) |
10:25.56 | *** join/#maemo-ssu lizardo (lizardo@nat/indt/x-fzvagbxznersvizo) |
11:32.34 | *** join/#maemo-ssu M13 (~Miranda@83.149.35.61) |
12:27.41 | *** join/#maemo-ssu freemangordon (~freemango@130-204-50-168.2074221835.ddns.cablebg.net) |
12:42.48 | *** join/#maemo-ssu NIN101 (~NIN@p5DD282D4.dip0.t-ipconnect.de) |
13:04.14 | *** join/#maemo-ssu futpib (~futpib@89.106.197.59) |
13:05.53 | *** join/#maemo-ssu M13 (~MirandaLS@170.133-224-87.telenet.ru) |
13:08.42 | *** join/#maemo-ssu futpib (~futpib@89.106.197.59) |
13:32.28 | *** join/#maemo-ssu Pali (~pali@Maemo/community/contributor/Pali) |
13:37.28 | *** join/#maemo-ssu CepiPerez (~matias@186.19.210.11) |
13:37.32 | *** part/#maemo-ssu CepiPerez (~matias@186.19.210.11) |
13:38.10 | *** join/#maemo-ssu LauRoman (~LauRoman@5-14-92-176.residential.rdsnet.ro) |
13:43.14 | *** join/#maemo-ssu arcean_ (~arcean@aact95.neoplus.adsl.tpnet.pl) |
14:34.16 | merlin1991 | ShadowJK: nah it rather returns on read when it feels like |
14:51.01 | Pali | merlin1991, anything about missing kernel-power in maemo package interface? |
14:51.34 | Pali | also all my promoted packages (from extras-devel) still missing |
14:52.43 | Pali | merlin1991, other question: how to delete some package from extras{-devel|-testing|} ? |
14:53.38 | Pali | and it is possible only for i386 arch? |
14:56.11 | *** join/#maemo-ssu Martix (~martix@static-84-242-103-180.net.upcbroadband.cz) |
14:56.13 | DocScrutinizer05 | Pali: there shouldn't be any normal way (user way) to delete anything from extras-testing or extras repo |
14:57.04 | Pali | why maintainer of package should not delete package? |
14:57.17 | DocScrutinizer05 | it usually casues problems for users who might already have installed that package, for example you can't restore normal backups anymore |
14:57.46 | Pali | it is not problem |
14:57.52 | DocScrutinizer05 | uhuh |
14:57.58 | Pali | HAM normally restore backup without that missing packages |
14:58.09 | Pali | I done it more times |
14:58.17 | DocScrutinizer05 | so how's that "not a problem"? |
14:58.28 | Pali | restore is not problem |
14:59.04 | Pali | you can restore normal backup without that missing packages |
14:59.05 | DocScrutinizer05 | nonsense, when a user can't restore a pkg from his backup since the pkg vanished on repo, this IS a problem |
15:00.11 | DocScrutinizer05 | extras-testing and particularly extras are generally not supposed to lose *any* package that been there |
15:00.24 | DocScrutinizer05 | only upgrade to more recent version |
15:00.49 | DocScrutinizer05 | why should any devel be allowed to delete his pkg from extras?? :-o |
15:01.44 | DocScrutinizer05 | after all you've put it into public domain and maemo.org only is hosting it |
15:02.21 | DocScrutinizer05 | you as well can ask google to delete a hit or cache from their engine |
15:03.10 | Pali | extras not, but extras-devele & extras-testing |
15:03.34 | DocScrutinizer05 | you're free to upload never version of any kind to extras-devel |
15:03.48 | Pali | reason could be conflict with new package... |
15:04.05 | Pali | or that some package cannot be installed due to bad dependences |
15:04.09 | DocScrutinizer05 | on extras-testing your promotion meant you're putting a supposedly "perfect2 package into public domain for virtually everybody |
15:04.10 | Pali | or bad architecture |
15:04.40 | Pali | e.g armel package is OK, but i386 not |
15:05.00 | Pali | and when you promote armel package, some maemo infra auto promote i386 |
15:05.15 | Pali | even if you did not clicked to promote i386 version |
15:05.24 | DocScrutinizer05 | if you didn't notice that on extras-devel, then we should remove *you* from devel accounts, not your *pkg* from extras-testing |
15:06.37 | DocScrutinizer05 | bottom line: there's no devel/user option to delete anything from any repo. You need to ask repo maintainers to do it for you |
15:06.53 | DocScrutinizer05 | and you will have to take a bit of bashing for what you did |
15:09.04 | Pali | I think that if developer upload new version of some package to extras-devel and after weak some testers report critical (which developer did not saw before), he should be able to remove binary deb package from extras-devel immediately to do not break other devices... |
15:09.50 | DocScrutinizer05 | you are free to upload a new fixed version that overrides the former version |
15:10.24 | Pali | for sure packages are free (and other people can still compile it/download) but there should be way to temporary disable/remove bad version until developer fix problem and upload new version |
15:10.32 | DocScrutinizer05 | your new version may consist of one empty sourcefile, plus the usual needed debian spicing around it |
15:11.07 | Pali | or to detele broken i386/armel binary package |
15:11.30 | DocScrutinizer05 | we're not going to implement delete function for repo content |
15:11.32 | Pali | somehing (e.g. HW related or broken due to compilers) cannot be fixed for specific arch |
15:12.19 | Pali | so binary deb package in repo is useless and only increase size of Packages.gz |
15:12.32 | Pali | (Packages.gz is not really yo big) |
15:12.33 | DocScrutinizer05 | *shrug* |
15:12.56 | Pali | DocScrutinizer05, how hard is to delete packages from extras-devel index? |
15:13.08 | DocScrutinizer05 | not exactly trivial |
15:13.34 | Pali | e.g if I prepare list of broken/unusable packages, can somebody look at it? |
15:14.35 | DocScrutinizer05 | sure, somebody could look at it, but there's no policy to remove a package from extras-devel, particularly not if there's no request from owner of package |
15:16.38 | DocScrutinizer05 | correct way: gain maintainership of pkg if you're not already, then upload a "new version" that has only a "PLEASE DELETE ME!" remark inside |
15:17.45 | DocScrutinizer05 | then eventually repo maintainer could grep all packages and actually delete those that have such remark for long enough so any other user or maintainer could have raised objections |
15:21.20 | kerio | Pali: having a dummy package is the right thing to do, anyway |
15:21.34 | kerio | so you'll also neuter the package in n900s |
15:27.06 | Pali | but still no way to remove *only* i386 package |
15:45.25 | DocScrutinizer05 | err, wasn't there a pretty simple way to specify arch(es) to build pkg for? |
15:46.23 | DocScrutinizer05 | if you don't feel happy with the i386 part of pkg, upload a new version that specifies arch:armel only |
15:46.47 | DocScrutinizer05 | I might be talking outa my arse# |
15:48.46 | DocScrutinizer05 | or rather: if there's a borked package in the fremantle/i36 branch of repo, you need a new source package that builds a neutered version for i386 arch only. Probably feasible by some #ifdef |
15:50.38 | DocScrutinizer05 | or maybe simply by specifying arch:i386 only, in that void new version, so fremantle/arm branch keeps the old good version while new neutered version goes to i36 branch only |
15:54.50 | *** join/#maemo-ssu sv (~discopig@2001:5c0:1000:a::11bd) |
15:54.50 | *** join/#maemo-ssu sv (~discopig@unaffiliated/discopig) |
16:06.36 | *** join/#maemo-ssu Martix_ (~martix@static-84-242-103-180.net.upcbroadband.cz) |
16:16.43 | merlin1991 | midgard should have an interface to delte packages |
16:16.57 | merlin1991 | but err it never worked for me because the buttons never showed up |
17:43.20 | *** join/#maemo-ssu futpib_ (~futpib@89.106.197.90) |
17:45.32 | *** join/#maemo-ssu Estel_ (~Estel@Maemo/community/contributor/Estel-) |
18:03.09 | *** join/#maemo-ssu jon_y_ (~enforcer@2002:3c35:9d87::3c35:9d87) |
18:03.10 | *** join/#maemo-ssu sv (~discopig@unaffiliated/discopig) |
18:14.07 | *** join/#maemo-ssu Vlad_on_the_road (~Vlad_on_t@ip-66.net-82-216-1.versailles2.rev.numericable.fr) |
18:29.55 | *** join/#maemo-ssu nox- (noident@freebsd/developer/nox) |
18:57.31 | *** join/#maemo-ssu int_ua (~int_ua@ip-602f.proline.net.ua) |
19:11.13 | *** join/#maemo-ssu Pali (~pali@Maemo/community/contributor/Pali) |
20:00.07 | *** join/#maemo-ssu andre__ (~andre@wikimedia/aklapper) |
20:55.02 | *** join/#maemo-ssu zogg_ (~zoggrules@bzq-79-177-57-64.red.bezeqint.net) |
20:55.50 | *** join/#maemo-ssu Vlad_on_the_road (~Vlad_on_t@ip-66.net-82-216-1.versailles2.rev.numericable.fr) |
22:00.01 | *** join/#maemo-ssu dhbiker (~dhbiker@193.2.218.150) |