| 17:36.55 | *** join/#htc-blueangel apt (i=ibot@pdpc/supporter/active/TimRiker/bot/apt) |
| 17:36.55 | *** topic/#htc-blueangel is HTC BlueAngel is still under development ! Feel free to ask and check also -> http://www.handhelds.org/moin/moin.cgi/BlueAngel | http://wiki.xda-developers.com/index.php?pagename=BlueangelResearch | http://gnulinux.biz/files/blueangel/sd/linux/ channel chat logs at http://ibot.rikers.org/%23htc-blueangel/ * http://www.userfriendly.org/ * |
| 17:37.04 | *** join/#htc-blueangel iclem (n=iclem@iclem.net) |
| 17:38.02 | iclem | hi |
| 17:38.12 | iclem | ~seen llange |
| 17:38.14 | apt | llange <n=llange@lange.nom.fr> was last seen on IRC in channel #htc-blueangel, 1d 14h 56m 36s ago, saying: 'cu. bye everybody.'. |
| 17:40.49 | *** join/#htc-blueangel rob_w (n=bob@p85.212.166.146.tisdip.tiscali.de) |
| 17:40.49 | *** mode/#htc-blueangel [+o rob_w] by ChanServ |
| 18:19.17 | iclem | rob_w: is apt the same bot as "ibot" on #handhelds.org & #gpe ? |
| 18:41.53 | *** join/#htc-blueangel bedboi (n=bedboi@signserv.Signal.Uu.Se) |
| 18:41.56 | bedboi | hi there |
| 18:42.15 | bedboi | wow. |
| 18:42.23 | bedboi | i really want blueangel :) |
| 18:42.41 | bedboi | i'm dreaming gpe on it |
| 18:51.53 | rob_w | yes and now |
| 18:52.06 | rob_w | they have different names . :-) |
| 18:53.46 | bedboi | wqhat? |
| 18:53.48 | bedboi | what? |
| 18:54.09 | rob_w | from what i know the share the source code |
| 18:54.36 | rob_w | but they have different names in order to seperate the different " clones " from each other ... i think |
| 18:56.06 | oho | Hi rob_w |
| 18:56.25 | *** join/#htc-blueangel bwegh (n=bwegh@p54A33E04.dip0.t-ipconnect.de) |
| 18:56.26 | oho | do you know a bit about the gomunicator source code ? |
| 18:57.09 | bedboi | well to develop a gpe system smartphone ready we really need a PIM framework |
| 18:57.16 | bedboi | to share contacts |
| 18:57.18 | bedboi | and so on |
| 18:57.22 | rob_w | gpe has that |
| 18:57.26 | bedboi | i know |
| 18:57.33 | rob_w | right sorry |
| 18:57.48 | bedboi | i'm planning a real PIM framework |
| 18:57.51 | bedboi | with dbus |
| 18:57.53 | bedboi | and so on |
| 18:58.02 | rob_w | well we need to find our way to gpe-contacts and stuff ,, and cp15 already has patches on his side |
| 18:58.38 | rob_w | i am not coding here atm but i give my best to help , i will apply some himalaya stuff today |
| 18:59.32 | bedboi | i really need a smartphone |
| 18:59.36 | bedboi | i lack that |
| 18:59.53 | bedboi | got an ipaq the n770, now i need that |
| 19:06.50 | bedboi | gotta go |
| 19:06.52 | *** part/#htc-blueangel bedboi (n=bedboi@signserv.Signal.Uu.Se) |
| 19:17.07 | *** join/#htc-blueangel _cronos_ (n=cronos@ron34-1-82-224-149-102.fbx.proxad.net) |
| 19:34.33 | *** join/#htc-blueangel _cronos_ (n=cronos@ron34-1-82-224-149-102.fbx.proxad.net) |
| 20:44.34 | *** join/#htc-blueangel iclem (n=iclem@iclem.net) |
| 21:20.00 | *** join/#htc-blueangel apt (i=ibot@pdpc/supporter/active/TimRiker/bot/apt) |
| 21:20.00 | *** topic/#htc-blueangel is HTC BlueAngel is still under development ! Feel free to ask and check also -> http://www.handhelds.org/moin/moin.cgi/BlueAngel | http://wiki.xda-developers.com/index.php?pagename=BlueangelResearch | http://gnulinux.biz/files/blueangel/sd/linux/ channel chat logs at http://ibot.rikers.org/%23htc-blueangel/ * http://www.userfriendly.org/ * |
| 22:15.04 | *** join/#htc-blueangel oho_ (n=phil@81-179-87-148.dsl.pipex.com) |
| 22:19.15 | *** join/#htc-blueangel oho_ (n=phil@81-179-87-148.dsl.pipex.com) |
| 22:47.49 | *** join/#htc-blueangel JuNuKN (n=JuNuKN@K9bbc.k.pppool.de) |
| 22:48.54 | *** join/#htc-blueangel cp15 (i=iticnj@p549A129F.dip0.t-ipconnect.de) |
| 22:48.54 | *** mode/#htc-blueangel [+o cp15] by ChanServ |
| 22:49.07 | cp15 | Hi |
| 22:49.14 | cp15 | Ah, apt is back |
| 22:49.27 | oho_ | hi cp15 |
| 22:50.12 | cp15 | Hi oho |
| 22:50.28 | oho_ | I did quite a bit of work on gomunicator and I understand now what's going on |
| 22:50.50 | cp15 | Ok, then explain me :-) |
| 22:50.59 | oho_ | I will add new functionality to it tomorrow |
| 22:51.12 | cp15 | What functionality? |
| 22:51.17 | oho_ | first, it is all a bit mess and needs tidying up |
| 22:51.36 | oho_ | signal strenght is on top of my list |
| 22:52.02 | cp15 | True, it has been gone through 3 hands and everybody made it worse, I think |
| 22:52.11 | oho_ | but I am not sure yet what's the best way to do periodical calls in C - but I guess there is a way in gtk |
| 22:52.29 | oho_ | and I will do a bit of docu |
| 22:52.31 | cp15 | I think I would update the at command handling first |
| 22:53.00 | oho_ | agree, that's quite messy |
| 22:53.09 | cp15 | We need 3 cases: Synchronous commands, asynchronous commands and unsolicited replies |
| 22:53.19 | cp15 | case 1 and 2 with a timeout |
| 22:53.59 | oho_ | yeah the time out is different for nearly every call at the moment |
| 22:54.24 | oho_ | I agree with you that it is better to put it in fixed categories |
| 22:55.20 | oho_ | after that I have a few ideas for new functionality |
| 22:55.32 | cp15 | And I got already a expensive problem with that. I was in a tunnel and issued a call... It didn't come through, I thought |
| 22:56.03 | cp15 | So I tried it again when I was out of it. Then the first call got on hold, and I made a second call. |
| 22:56.16 | oho_ | oh dear |
| 22:56.16 | cp15 | Hangup terminated the second call, but the first one stayed for 2 hours |
| 22:56.50 | oho_ | so we should make sure that the user can see if a call is on hold |
| 22:57.14 | oho_ | also I am not a great fan of the on hold function - as I can't really see the need |
| 22:58.06 | oho_ | or how about an on-hold time out |
| 22:58.13 | cp15 | Yeah, I already thought about calling at+clcc after each command which supposedly changes the call state |
| 22:59.02 | cp15 | A timeout works fine as long as gomunicator knows that there is a call "on hold". But it didn't |
| 22:59.23 | oho_ | what do you think is the best way to do some periodical checking ? no problem in python, but I am not sure what's the best way in C |
| 22:59.43 | cp15 | There is a nice timeout function in glib |
| 22:59.52 | oho_ | I looked at that today |
| 22:59.55 | oho_ | timer |
| 23:00.31 | cp15 | g_timeout_add(int milliseconds, function, function_data) |
| 23:00.56 | cp15 | Will call function with function_data after at least milliseconds time |
| 23:01.42 | oho_ | as I said I will do some tidying up tomorrow |
| 23:02.02 | oho_ | but now I am off to bed |
| 23:02.05 | cp15 | If the function returns FALSE, it won't be called again, if it returns TRUE, it will be called again after milliseconds time |
| 23:02.09 | cp15 | Good night |
| 23:02.31 | oho_ | ah ok - that's nice, so you don't have to start it again |
| 23:03.15 | oho_ | good night - and I will keep you updated |
| 23:03.24 | cp15 | Good night and thanks |
| 23:03.53 | oho_ | you are the last one who needs to thank anyone - I think it is on us others now to give a bit back |
| 23:04.04 | oho_ | see you |
| 23:51.28 | cp15 | Good night |