| 00:09.01 | *** join/#bzflag Sgeo (~Sgeo@ool-18b982ad.dyn.optonline.net) |
| 00:44.56 | *** join/#bzflag Flash (~flash@2601:280:c200:4e39:80ee:58de:148b:a457) |
| 00:44.57 | *** mode/#bzflag [+v Flash] by ChanServ |
| 01:24.54 | *** join/#bzflag FieldSobers (~FieldSobe@unaffiliated/user49) |
| 02:29.14 | *** join/#bzflag Flash (~flash@2601:280:c200:4e39:80ee:58de:148b:a457) |
| 02:29.14 | *** mode/#bzflag [+v Flash] by ChanServ |
| 08:41.04 | *** join/#bzflag infobot (ibot@c-174-52-60-165.hsd1.ut.comcast.net) |
| 08:41.04 | *** topic/#bzflag is BZFlag Support and Development || Latest version: 2.4.20 || https://www.bzflag.org || https://www.bzflag.org/help/ || https://www.openhub.net/p/bzflag || https://logs.bzexcess.com/freenode/%23bzflag/ || New release! https://forums.bzflag.org/viewtopic.php?f=62&t=20395 |
| 08:41.04 | *** mode/#bzflag [+v infobot] by ChanServ |
| 09:03.11 | *** join/#bzflag I_Died_Once (~I_Died_On@unaffiliated/idiedonce/x-1828535) |
| 12:25.47 | *** join/#bzflag _I_Died_Once (~I_Died_On@unaffiliated/idiedonce/x-1828535) |
| 14:42.18 | *** join/#bzflag fanta1 (~fanta1@p200300f76bc8320034aa5b4ac277a65c.dip0.t-ipconnect.de) |
| 16:32.48 | *** join/#bzflag I_Died_Once (~I_Died_On@unaffiliated/idiedonce/x-1828535) |
| 18:46.11 | tupone | Flash: Previous check was "10.1.0" >= "4.3" and it did not succeed. |
| 18:46.49 | tupone | the only comparison could be made as string as 10.1.0 is not a number |
| 18:47.47 | tupone | the change is to make each version piece as a 2 digit number and concatenate all |
| 18:55.54 | BZNotify | bzflag: 03atupone commented on pull request #253 "Better gcc compiler version check. Previous check failed for gcc-10" (06https://git.io/Jf0Rj): > Can you please describe the motivation for this change?... |
| 19:42.35 | BZNotify | bzflag: 03atupone 11synchronized pull request #253 "Better gcc compiler version check. Previous check failed for gcc-10" (06https://git.io/JfRqR) |
| 21:00.52 | blast007 | tupone / Flash: is this a better option? https://www.gnu.org/software/autoconf-archive/ax_compare_version.html |
| 21:01.14 | *** join/#bzflag _I_Died_Once (~I_Died_On@unaffiliated/idiedonce/x-1828535) |
| 21:01.48 | Flash | I'm not skilled at autoconf at all, but on the surface that looks good to me |
| 21:08.51 | tupone | blast007: the oldest one was not working |
| 21:08.58 | tupone | with gcc-10 |
| 21:09.56 | tupone | another option would be to test if mtune work by compiling a little program or if mtune=native works |
| 21:10.07 | blast007 | tupone: "oldest one" referring to what? |
| 21:10.18 | tupone | the one that is in 2.4 |
| 21:10.47 | tupone | if you compile with gcc-10 it selects -march=k8 |
| 21:11.59 | blast007 | we don't have ax_compare_version.m4 in 2.4 |
| 21:12.35 | tupone | we have a test in configure.ac that select -march or -mtune in 2.4 |
| 21:12.53 | blast007 | We currently do a string comparison. I'm suggesting the use of that M4 macro that is designed to compare versions. |
| 21:13.45 | tupone | I have not found one. If you have, good |
| 21:13.55 | blast007 | I linked to one.. |
| 21:13.59 | tupone | lemme check |
| 21:14.13 | Flash | we probably need to download it and put it in our m4 directory |
| 21:15.01 | blast007 | yeah |
| 21:15.17 | tupone | it seems good. I thought it could be one outside. That is why I did not commit :) |
| 21:15.57 | Flash | I seem to recall having to add another m4 macro before ... good find blast007 |
| 21:53.14 | *** join/#bzflag I_Died_Once (~I_Died_On@unaffiliated/idiedonce/x-1828535) |
| 22:29.39 | *** join/#bzflag I_Died_Once (~I_Died_On@unaffiliated/idiedonce/x-1828535) |
| 22:40.25 | *** join/#bzflag I_Died_Once (~I_Died_On@unaffiliated/idiedonce/x-1828535) |
| 22:51.46 | Flash | tupone: are you going to replace with ax_compare_version? |
| 22:52.26 | Flash | I pasted your change into a shell and I got 4.2.1, not 040201, so I must be missing something |
| 22:58.19 | blast007 | yeah, my gcc's -dumpversion just shows 8 |
| 22:59.32 | Flash | I'm not clear on where the $host_vendor comes from or what "pc" means |
| 23:04.56 | blast007 | yeah, I'm not sure where that is coming from. There's a AC_CANONICAL_HOST macro that is suppose to compute that, but we're only calling AC_CANONICAL_TARGET in configure.ac |
| 23:07.14 | *** join/#bzflag I_Died_Once (~I_Died_On@unaffiliated/idiedonce/x-1828535) |
| 23:13.34 | blast007 | Flash: the "pc" vendor seems to just refer to an "IBM PC compatible" |
| 23:31.43 | Flash | so basically, anything with an Intel/AMD chip? |
| 23:49.00 | blast007 | I assume so |
| 23:50.43 | blast007 | I couldn't find a lot of info about it. |