IRC log for #brlcad on 20100122

`00:24.26`	`Nohla`	`@last Nohla`
`00:24.37`	`Nohla`	`buuuu`
`00:26.28`	``Erik	`~seen nohla`
`00:26.33`	`ibot`	`nohla is currently on #brlcad (1h 4m 40s). Has said a total of 2 messages. Is idling for 1m 56s, last said: 'buuuu'.`
`00:35.33`	`*** join/#brlcad Ralith (n=ralith@69.90.48.97)`
`00:39.11`	`Nohla`	`I wanted the last of yesterday :P`
`00:39.23`	`Nohla`	`<PROTECTED>`
`00:39.34`	`Nohla`	`this`
`00:45.05`	`starseeker`	`interlay puts the wireframe under the raytrace image, but keeps the faceplate gui on top`
`00:45.47`	`starseeker`	`To see this - check both Faceplate and Faceplate GUI under Misc in the MGED window`
`00:46.06`	`starseeker`	`Then bring up the raytrace control panel, do a raytrace, and enable the framebuffer`
`00:46.32`	`starseeker`	`Try switching between underlay, interlay and overlay`
`00:52.25`	`starseeker`	`does that help?`
`00:52.50`	`Nohla`	`yes :)`
`00:53.05`	`starseeker`	`interlay isn't used as commonly as the other modes`
`00:54.16`	`starseeker`	`situations where you want both a framebuffer view and the faceplate GUI are fairly rare`
`00:55.32`	`starseeker`	`any luck getting set up for committing?`
`00:59.06`	`starseeker`	`Nohla: if your login is fixed, committing is simple`
`01:00.02`	`Nohla`	`login in SF?`
`01:01.26`	`starseeker`	`yes`
`01:06.38`	`*** join/#brlcad R0b0t1 (n=Enigma@unaffiliated/r0b0t1)`
`01:07.23`	`Nohla`	`it's done :)`
`01:07.30`	`Nohla`	`my problem is my own notebook :(`
`01:07.48`	`Nohla`	`it socks :P`
`01:08.51`	`Nohla`	`starseeker when I feel ready, I'll tell you. Tomorrow I guess`
`01:09.03`	`Nohla`	`don't wanna go to bed too late`
`01:09.10`	`starseeker`	`no problem`
`01:09.33`	`Nohla`	`and it ask a lot from me :)`
`01:09.59`	`starseeker`	`is busy tonight too, no worries`
`02:00.43`	`starseeker`	`growls... great, more corporate money dumped into the political process. Just what we needed.`
`02:12.06`	``Erik	`http://misadigital.com/ O.o`
`02:32.17`	`CIA-82`	`BRL-CAD: 03starseeker * r37386 10/brlcad/trunk/ (10 files in 6 dirs): Get the initial rigging in place for libanalyze. One function from gqa has been put in place, mainly for testing purposes - whole lot of thinking needed to do this 'right'.`
`02:33.37`	`CIA-82`	`BRL-CAD: 03starseeker * r37387 10/brlcad/trunk/misc/pkgconfig/Makefile.am: Whoops, missed a Makefile.am`
`02:35.04`	`CIA-82`	`BRL-CAD: 03starseeker * r37388 10/brlcad/trunk/include/Makefile.am: Darn it, make that two Makefile.ams missed.`
`02:35.30`	``Erik	`snicker`
`02:36.27`	`starseeker`	`I know, I know`
`02:47.22`	`louipc`	`haha gentoo powered guitar`
`02:55.16`	`starseeker`	`heads home`
`03:01.03`	`Nohla`	`starseeker are you still there?`
`03:01.42`	`Nohla`	`buuu`
`03:05.57`	`Nohla`	`well, is anybody out there? I've a simple question about a word.`
`03:06.06`	`louipc`	`hi`
`03:06.14`	`Nohla`	`louipc hi 2`
`03:09.42`	`*** join/#brlcad jesica__ (n=jesica@168.226.176.181)`
`03:09.53`	`jesica__`	`sorry I'm back`
`03:10.11`	`jesica__`	`I'm trying to translate blast command`
`03:10.24`	`jesica__`	`literally blast is like blow up`
`03:10.52`	`jesica__`	`but its function remaind me the word refresh more than explode`
`03:11.50`	`jesica__`	`*remind`
`03:12.18`	`louipc`	`hmm I'm not sure what the command's name comes from`
`03:12.50`	`jesica__`	`blast replace both, Z and Draw command`
`03:12.52`	`louipc`	`it reminds me more of etch-a-sketch`
`03:13.17`	`louipc`	`you know that toy with the two dials that you draw with`
`03:13.32`	`louipc`	`if you shake it everything is erased and you can draw again`
`03:14.21`	`jesica__`	`well, but it clears the grafic window and redraw the last parametres`
`03:14.33`	`jesica__`	`It's not the same, I think`
`03:14.46`	`brlcad`	`hey jesica__`
`03:14.46`	``Erik	`the 'b' blast command?`
`03:14.51`	`jesica__`	`yes`
`03:14.52`	`brlcad`	`B is blast`
`03:15.04`	`jesica__`	`ah?`
`03:15.07`	``Erik	`it sets the display list to the specified item (removing everything that used to be in it)`
`03:15.32`	`brlcad`	`B == Z + e`
`03:15.38`	`louipc`	`why's it called blast?`
`03:15.46`	``Erik	`cuz it's both barrels, baybee`
`03:15.56`	`brlcad`	`Z is zap`
`03:16.16`	`jesica__`	`brlcad I know, but I can see why it's called blast`
`03:16.31`	`brlcad`	`jesica__: can or cannot?`
`03:16.40`	`jesica__`	`can't :)`
`03:17.05`	`brlcad`	`because it's derived from "zap" ... but does more`
`03:17.27`	`jesica__`	`?`
`03:17.50`	`louipc`	`i'll zap you with my laser cannon`
`03:17.52`	``Erik	`mostly colloquialisms... :)`
`03:18.02`	`louipc`	`I mean blast you with my laser cannon`
`03:18.54`	`brlcad`	`hm, que significa zap.. que es lo que pasa cuando tocas una amiga y te pasa una pequen~a electrificacion? .. en ingles, se dice que el sonido es un "zap"`
`03:18.54`	`jesica__`	`but blast doesn't draw again`
`03:19.08`	`brlcad`	`"B something"`
`03:19.11`	`jesica__`	`tocas a una amiga???JAJAJAJA`
`03:19.23`	`jesica__`	`aaaah tocar de tocar!`
`03:19.23`	`brlcad`	`no asi .. :P`
`03:19.23`	``Erik	`blast will draw only what's specified, it sets the display list`
`03:19.26`	`jesica__`	`XD`
`03:20.16`	`brlcad`	`electricidad est?tica causa un sonido "zap"`
`03:20.39`	`jesica__`	`brlcad do you know the synonymous of blast, in spanish?`
`03:20.43`	`brlcad`	`blast es como una explosion, mas grande :)`
`03:21.00`	`jesica__`	`una explosion redibuja?`
`03:21.05`	`brlcad`	`ra'faga?`
`03:21.22`	`jesica__`	`busqu? su traduccion literal`
`03:21.46`	`jesica__`	`me confunde que sea Z y draw`
`03:22.13`	`brlcad`	`"B algo" == "Z + e algo"`
`03:22.21`	`jesica__`	`sorry, we shouldn't write spanish :P`
`03:22.43`	`brlcad`	`oh, and "e" is "draw"`
`03:22.49`	`brlcad`	`they mean the exact same thing`
`03:23.03`	`brlcad`	`I'm just used to the old short name`
`03:23.29`	`brlcad`	`'draw' is the newer name for the command, what everyone should be using`
`03:23.53`	`jesica__`	`The Blast command is shorthand for the combination of the Z and draw`
`03:23.53`	`jesica__`	`commands.`
`03:24.08`	``Erik	`if spanish improves communication to aid in translating, then why not? :) I'll just sit here and imagine you were talking about commodores and tacos :D duck`
`03:24.11`	`jesica__`	`that says the lesson`
`03:24.27`	`brlcad`	`jesica, do you know what transparency paper is?`
`03:24.46`	`jesica__`	`yes`
`03:25.40`	`brlcad`	`if you have two pieces of transparency paper, those are like the framebuffer and the graphics window .. overlay/interlay/underlay is how those two sheets interact`
`03:26.17`	`Nohla`	`ah?...`
`03:26.27`	`brlcad`	`overlay, the framebuffer sheet is on top; underlay, the framebuffer sheet is underneath .. and interlay is a little more complicated but they basically go through each other`
`03:27.20`	`Nohla`	`you can see both at the same time?`
`03:27.28`	`Nohla`	`no...`
`03:28.03`	`Nohla`	`if they're transparencies you can with overlay and underlay too`
`03:28.10`	`Nohla`	`doesn't it?`
`03:29.56`	`brlcad`	`you can see both`
`03:30.01`	`brlcad`	`until you draw on them`
`03:30.10`	`brlcad`	`then whichever is on top will show`
`03:30.46`	`brlcad`	`so if you are overlay and have raytraced, you will not see the wireframe.. because the raytrace is drawn to the framebuffer (which is on top)`
`03:31.21`	`brlcad`	`if you switch it to underlay, the framebuffer will be underneath and you'll see both the wireframe and the raytrace`
`03:35.19`	`Nohla`	`until I draw on then too`
`03:35.22`	`*** join/#brlcad Desert69 (n=Desert69@190.48.220.225)`
`03:36.14`	`Nohla`	`brlcad we left blast :P`
`03:36.45`	`brlcad`	`right, until you draw on the graphics window too.. but those are a LOT harder to fill :)`
`03:37.29`	`brlcad`	`which is a pretty useless wireframe if it has that many edges :)`
`03:38.15`	`Nohla`	`and interlay bring both views?`
`03:38.25`	`Nohla`	`even if you draw on it?`
`03:39.28`	`Nohla`	`buuu hard to put it in my head :P`
`03:39.37`	`brlcad`	`interlay depends on the depth of objects in the graphics window.. it is more like a cube and the framebuffer slices through it`
`03:39.57`	`brlcad`	`it's easier to understand when you run mged and see it in action`
`03:40.14`	`Nohla`	`so I should`
`03:41.54`	`Nohla`	`well, brlcad sorry if I'm boring with it`
`03:42.16`	`Nohla`	`but I still cannot understand how blast can build a draw`
`03:42.33`	`Nohla`	`at least, it's an explosion :)`
`03:46.28`	`brlcad`	`Nohla: heh, you're not boring :P`
`03:46.44`	`brlcad`	`nobody claimed that blast was a good name :)`
`03:47.19`	`brlcad`	`technically it's just the "B" command, but it was derived from zap so it was called blast`
`03:47.23`	`louipc`	`it sounds like it's a blast`
`03:47.45`	`brlcad`	`very punny`
`03:47.48`	`Nohla`	`no :)`
`03:47.53`	`Nohla`	`I dont think that`
`03:48.40`	`Nohla`	`blast = zap ?`
`03:49.55`	`Nohla`	`such a pun!`
`03:50.46`	`Nohla`	`well, I've done worse thing with marijuana :)`
`03:51.16`	`brlcad`	`heh`
`03:51.55`	`Nohla`	`brlcad any suggestion to translate it?`
`03:52.10`	`brlcad`	`"sounds like it's a blast" contains a pun on blast -- there it means "sounds like it's a lot of fun"`
`03:52.20`	`Nohla`	`just to bring and idea for some pleople who don't know a word in english`
`03:52.39`	`brlcad`	`call it the "B" command :)`
`03:52.54`	`brlcad`	`borrar y dibujar`
`03:53.10`	`Nohla`	`isn't it like refresh?`
`03:53.16`	`brlcad`	`no`
`03:53.27`	`Desert69`	`redraw? :)`
`03:53.31`	`Nohla`	`it zap and write? or zap and let it ready to be drawn?`
`03:53.38`	`Desert69`	`(hi there! :) )`
`03:53.59`	`brlcad`	`it's only a redraw if you B the same object(s) you were already looking at`
`03:54.10`	`brlcad`	`but you can erase and draw anything`
`03:54.48`	`Nohla`	`well, I'll do this: explain what B does, and since then, i'll just call it B command`
`03:54.50`	`*** join/#brlcad akafubu (n=akafubu@unaffiliated/akafubu)`
`03:54.56`	`Nohla`	`do you like it?`
`03:55.08`	`brlcad`	`sounds great`
`03:55.24`	`brlcad`	`you could say "Borrar y dibujar"`
`03:55.33`	`brlcad`	`that fits`
`03:55.54`	`Nohla`	`its not the same that zap and let it ready to draw`
`03:56.00`	`Nohla`	`isn't it?`
`03:56.14`	`brlcad`	`no entiendo`
`03:56.38`	`Nohla`	`it zap and write? or zap and let it ready to be drawn?`
`03:56.46`	`brlcad`	`"B object" is exactly equal to "Z" followed by "draw object"`
`03:56.54`	`Desert69`	`it do draws every object you were looking at, right?`
`03:57.19`	`Nohla`	`brlcad ah ok`
`03:57.21`	`brlcad`	`no, Desert69 .. it draws whaever object(s) you list after B`
`03:57.30`	`brlcad`	`draw a b c`
`03:57.31`	`brlcad`	`Z`
`03:57.43`	`brlcad`	`[that erases a b c]`
`03:57.48`	`Desert69`	`apsss ok... got it :)`
`03:57.49`	`Nohla`	`loud and clear :)`
`03:57.49`	`brlcad`	`draw a b c`
`03:57.58`	`brlcad`	`B a d e f`
`03:58.09`	`brlcad`	`[that erases a b c, then draws a d e f]`
`03:58.30`	`brlcad`	`would have been the same as`
`03:58.33`	`brlcad`	`Z`
`03:58.35`	`brlcad`	`draw a d e f`
`03:58.40`	`brlcad`	`instead it's just`
`03:58.41`	`brlcad`	`B a d e f`
`03:59.11`	`brlcad`	`minor efficiency, but pretty important when you do that hundreds of time in one day`
`04:00.55`	`Nohla`	`brlcad I'll finish 4th and 5th tomorrow`
`04:01.25`	`Nohla`	`and starseeker will help me and show me something he announced yesterday`
`04:01.59`	`Nohla`	`(maybe you know what)`
`04:02.08`	`starseeker`	`Nohla: I announced something?`
`04:02.40`	`Nohla`	`starseeker I was not in that moment, but read it before`
`04:02.46`	`Nohla`	`let me look for it`
`04:04.14`	`Nohla`	`well, I don't know`
`04:05.17`	`Nohla`	`It was something like you changed (don't know what) and will show me how to do it now`
`04:05.30`	`Nohla`	`with that change`
`04:05.35`	`starseeker`	`uh`
`04:05.54`	`Nohla`	`sorry, I was too tired when I read it`
`04:06.05`	`starseeker`	`if your sourceforge account is ready, I can walk you through doing the commit of the two new translations yourself`
`04:06.24`	`Nohla`	`ok, we will`
`04:06.37`	`Nohla`	`(tomorrow, you know)`
`04:06.41`	`starseeker`	`brlcad: she does have commit access, yes?`
`04:06.52`	`starseeker`	`to at least doc/docbook?`
`04:07.04`	`Nohla`	`starseeker I think I do`
`04:07.12`	`starseeker`	`ok, cool :-)`
`04:07.17`	`Nohla`	`used it the last time`
`04:07.21`	`starseeker`	`tomorrow then`
`04:07.23`	`starseeker`	`crashes`
`04:07.55`	`Nohla`	`too`
`04:08.41`	`Desert69`	`see ya`
`04:08.42`	`*** part/#brlcad Desert69 (n=Desert69@190.48.220.225)`
`04:10.50`	`Nohla`	`well, brlcad thanks again`
`04:11.04`	`Nohla`	`starseeker see you tomorrow :)`
`04:11.31`	`Nohla`	`a great pleasure... like always`
`04:16.26`	`Nohla`	`brlcad sorry, I'll take this for me: que significa zap.. que es lo que pasa cuando tocas una amiga y te pasa una pequen~a electrificacion? .. en ingles, se dice que el sonido es un "zap"`
`04:16.30`	`Nohla`	`very funny :)`
`04:28.31`	`CIA-82`	`BRL-CAD: 03brlcad * r37389 10/brlcad/trunk/misc/brlcad-config.in: add libanalyze the brlcad-config`
`04:31.11`	`CIA-82`	`BRL-CAD: 03starseeker * r37390 10/brlcad/branches/dmtogl/ (232 files in 66 dirs): Merge trunk into dmtogl through revision 37388.`
`04:34.46`	`*** join/#brlcad Nohla (n=jesica@168.226.176.181)`
`04:34.59`	`Nohla`	`starseeker are you still there?`
`04:35.10`	`Nohla`	`just 1 second`
`04:52.15`	`Nohla`	`well, good night`
`06:17.49`	`CIA-82`	`BRL-CAD: 03brlcad * r37391 10/brlcad/trunk/src/librt/primitives/nmg/nmg_tri_mc.c: and this is why strict needs to be enabled.. quell newly introduced warnings.`
`06:38.37`	`CIA-82`	`BRL-CAD: 03brlcad * r37392 10/brlcad/trunk/regress/Makefile.am: clean up the other bots files too`
`07:16.57`	`*** join/#brlcad akafubu (n=akafubu@unaffiliated/akafubu)`
`07:48.26`	`*** join/#brlcad Phurl (n=mdupont@ip-81-210-245-60.unitymediagroup.de)`
`08:20.31`	`CIA-82`	`BRL-CAD: 03brlcad * r37393 10/brlcad/trunk/src/librt/roots.c:`
`08:20.31`	`CIA-82`	`BRL-CAD: clear up the exact floating point comparison by converting it to a NEAR_ZERO`
`08:20.31`	`CIA-82`	`BRL-CAD: test, but keep the 1.0e-5 magic number on the subsequent test. still need to`
`08:20.31`	`CIA-82`	`BRL-CAD: figure out why it's so sensitive for the eto, but this takes care of the`
`08:20.31`	`CIA-82`	`BRL-CAD: comparison warning. while we're in here, (re-)increase the number of root`
`08:20.34`	`CIA-82`	`BRL-CAD: solver iterations to 100 from 20 to give the solver more of a fighting chance if`
`08:20.36`	`CIA-82`	`BRL-CAD: it is stuck in a linear search.`
`08:21.23`	`CIA-82`	`BRL-CAD: 03brlcad * r37394 10/brlcad/trunk/src/librt/Makefile.am: re-enable strict flags for librt. let the fun continue.`
`08:22.06`	`CIA-82`	`BRL-CAD: 03brlcad * r37395 10/brlcad/trunk/TODO: the roots exact floating point comparison was requelled.`
`08:25.13`	`CIA-82`	`BRL-CAD: 03brlcad * r37396 10/brlcad/trunk/regress/solids.sh: not clear if it was intentional, but the keyword is 'shadows', not 'shadow', to turn on light shadows. fortunately, doesn't seem to mess up the test to enable them so we can quell the rt warnings.`
`09:23.04`	`*** join/#brlcad archivist (n=archivis@87-194-141-154.bethere.co.uk)`
`11:52.02`	`d-lo`	`Morning all!`
`11:52.10`	`d-lo`	`Late night or early day brlcad? :)`
`12:29.44`	`d-lo`	`hahaha: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8AyVh1_vWYQ`
`12:30.07`	`d-lo`	`has some language so it may be nsfw depending on where you work`
`14:07.20`	``Erik	`onion ftw`
`14:07.54`	``Erik	`that's actually fairly positive for a review of a sony product.. :D`
`14:28.46`	`starseeker`	`watches slashdot have another go at the H264 question and idly wonders how long until the patents on it fully expire...`
`14:32.29`	`starseeker`	`hmm, around 2025`
`14:34.25`	`starseeker`	`figures that probably means around HTML7 or so we get good quality video as part of the spec...`
`15:05.14`	``Erik	`is html5 using 264?`
`15:35.26`	`CIA-82`	`BRL-CAD: 03irpguardian * r37397 10/brlcad/trunk/src/rt/ (Makefile.am heatgraph.c view.c worker.c):`
`15:35.26`	`CIA-82`	`BRL-CAD: Major work done inside of heatgraph and worker to allow the heat-graph to be made`
`15:35.26`	`CIA-82`	`BRL-CAD: more accuratly. "Works" on goliath model, but dies when doing moss, due to a`
`15:35.26`	`CIA-82`	`BRL-CAD: "rt_shootray() bad ray" for some unknown reason.`
`17:52.39`	`CIA-82`	`BRL-CAD: 03brlcad * r37398 10/brlcad/trunk/src/rt/ (view.c worker.c): formatting cleanup, ws, style, consistency, comments.`
`18:00.18`	`brlcad`	`starseeker: perhaps you or bob can help this guy: https://sourceforge.net/projects/brlcad/forums/forum/362510/topic/3527163`
`18:00.57`	`brlcad`	`interactive mged editing of pipes, and get/put come to mind`
`18:17.35`	`CIA-82`	`BRL-CAD: 03irpguardian * r37399 10/brlcad/trunk/src/rt/ (heatgraph.c view.c worker.c):`
`18:17.35`	`CIA-82`	`BRL-CAD: Removed most old traces of heat graph calculations from view.`
`18:17.35`	`CIA-82`	`BRL-CAD: Various tweaks inside worker and heatgraph for calculations.`
`18:42.30`	`starseeker`	`brlcad: unless I'm nuts, there is no numerical overlap between either the raytrace or ged semaphores and any of the bu semaphores`
`18:43.11`	`starseeker`	`except RT_SEM_TREE0 = BU_SEM_LAST`
`18:43.33`	`starseeker`	`and GED_SEM_WORKER = RT_SEM_LAST`
`18:44.11`	`starseeker`	`all other definitions in both RT and GED just start incrementing from those initial definitions`
`18:48.54`	``Erik	`thinks irpguardian broke remrt`
`19:14.51`	`starseeker`	`Hmm. Shark says g_qa is semaphore happy`
`19:40.33`	`CIA-82`	`BRL-CAD: 03irpguardian * r37400 10/brlcad/trunk/src/rt/ (heatgraph.c view.c worker.c):`
`19:40.33`	`CIA-82`	`BRL-CAD: Removed almost all unused heat graph elements from view, and temporarily removed timetable_free`
`19:40.33`	`CIA-82`	`BRL-CAD: due to it free-ing too soon.`
`19:40.33`	`CIA-82`	`BRL-CAD: Replaced timers in worker.c to be the default timers.`
`19:40.33`	`CIA-82`	`BRL-CAD: Pretty much works now on 1 cpu.`
`19:53.17`	``Erik	`nice http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ydIUfRAEPjk`
`19:56.51`	`*** join/#brlcad akafubu (n=akafubu@unaffiliated/akafubu)`
`20:13.06`	`CIA-82`	`BRL-CAD: 03starseeker * r37401 10/brlcad/trunk/src/libged/gqa.c:`
`20:13.06`	`CIA-82`	`BRL-CAD: When there are debugging statements in gqa that ask for a semaphore lock, be`
`20:13.06`	`CIA-82`	`BRL-CAD: sure to lock ONLY if debug is enabled - was previously locking regardless,`
`20:13.06`	`CIA-82`	`BRL-CAD: slowing the process. This isn't all the semaphore issues, but it does help.`
`20:15.38`	``Erik	`http://flowingdata.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/01/Engineers-Guide-to-Drinks11.pdf`
`20:18.00`	`*** join/#brlcad Phurl (n=mdupont@ip-81-210-245-60.unitymediagroup.de)`
`20:18.27`	`CIA-82`	`BRL-CAD: 03starseeker * r37402 10/brlcad/trunk/src/libged/gqa.c:`
`20:18.27`	`CIA-82`	`BRL-CAD: Add a comment identifying the other major semaphore issue in the gqa code -`
`20:18.27`	`CIA-82`	`BRL-CAD: needs a little more study to see what the implications are of not using`
`20:18.27`	`CIA-82`	`BRL-CAD: semaphore's for those snippits of code and whether there is another way it can`
`20:18.29`	`CIA-82`	`BRL-CAD: be handled.`
`20:27.44`	`starseeker`	`I guess I should say, last issue for overlaps`
`20:27.57`	`starseeker`	`other code still has issues - that GED_STATS lock is murder`
`21:01.46`	`*** join/#brlcad R0b0t1 (n=Enigma@unaffiliated/r0b0t1)`
`21:18.24`	`*** join/#brlcad rafael (n=rafael@apn-95-40-69-203.dynamic.gprs.plus.pl)`
`21:18.41`	`rafael`	`hey`
`21:19.00`	`rafael`	`brlcad is similar to AUTOCAD ?`
`21:44.27`	`CIA-82`	`BRL-CAD: 03brlcad * r37403 10/brlcad/trunk/TODO: need to test rcodes/wcodes/edcodes, also figure out what's up with the new? tessellation failures.`
`21:49.18`	`brlcad`	`i bet when gqa was originally written, the trace dominated`
`21:49.26`	`brlcad`	`so you didn't see the stats contention`
`21:49.53`	`brlcad`	`now cpus are faster, it's stumbling more to the book-keeping and locks involved there`
`21:51.00`	``Erik	`g_qa is pretty recent, though`
`21:51.30`	`brlcad`	`5-years "recent"`
`21:51.49`	``Erik	`was it that long ago? O.o`
`21:51.59`	``Erik	`I thought it was more like 2.5ish`
`21:52.19`	``Erik	`wow, it was 5, damn`
`21:52.47`	``Erik	`7.4.2 O.o`
`21:55.58`	`brlcad`	`all those bu_semaphore_acquire(GED_SEM_WORKER); are dubious..`
`22:02.27`	`CIA-82`	`BRL-CAD: 03irpguardian * r37404 10/brlcad/trunk/src/rt/ (Makefile.am heatgraph.c view.c worker.c):`
`22:02.27`	`CIA-82`	`BRL-CAD: Fixed makefile to not be broken anymore`
`22:02.27`	`CIA-82`	`BRL-CAD: Fixed cursed malloc error in heatgraph so that it creates the pictures correctly now.`
`23:24.53`	`*** join/#brlcad Nohla (n=jesica@168.226.178.227)`

Generated by irclog2html.pl Modified by Tim Riker to work with infobot.