IRC log for #asterisk on 20120404

00:00.28drfreezeHave a client that is missing voicemails. They think that their hangup cases when checking voicemail are related to the missing voicemail
00:04.48*** join/#asterisk Bullmoose (~Bullmoose@65-129-15-179.bois.qwest.net)
00:16.41*** join/#asterisk albertoandrade (~albertoan@186.206.5.67)
00:29.58paolosupinop3nguin: will paste bin in a short while….
00:33.24kessiushi, how to make  asterisk listen on port 75793
00:34.38*** join/#asterisk michael-i (~anonymous@c-24-7-126-118.hsd1.ca.comcast.net)
00:37.26p3nguinkessius: Configure a channel to listen there.  Which channel do you want to listen on that port?
00:40.22*** part/#asterisk mjordan (~mjordan@nat/digium/x-qcsfwjwlflayvvui)
00:40.54kessius<PROTECTED>
00:43.00kessiusp3nguin, on asterisk sip.conf  set  bindport 5060, 75793
00:43.19*** join/#asterisk JunK-Y (~junky@pdpc/supporter/active/junk-y)
00:44.20[TK]D-Fenderfprior: Ok, where are the debugs and configs?
00:45.21paolosupinop3nguin: the paste in http://pastebin.com/JJcLf9Zg resulted in a private number being displayed.
00:46.46michael-iThis may not be the most appropriate forum but does anyone have a go-to recommendation for a PRI-SIP gateway? I don't want to use a card in the Asterisk server itself, would rather have a gateway in between.
00:49.19[TK]D-Fendermichael-i: All very expensive by comparison.  AudioCodes Mediant series, or perhaps Quintum.... Mediatrix ones were a little iffy in the firmware dept.
00:49.48[TK]D-Fendermichael-i: And that question is just fine for here
00:50.07michael-i[TK]D-Fender: expensive is ok, it just has to work well
00:51.19JunK-Ymediatrix!
00:51.51michael-ifrom someone named junky ;) ;) I'm scared
00:52.41kessiussomeone [TK]D-Fender how to   make  the asterisk listem port   75793  - i do  bindport = 5060,75973,5050 - the * accepted these parameters  -    how to  test if *  listem 75793
00:52.54michael-iisn't that out of the port range?!
00:53.05kessiusPlease I need help
00:53.42lanningon linux as root "netstat -anpu"
00:56.13p3nguinkessius: You can't do that.  chan_sip can only listen on one port.
00:56.32p3nguinAnd yes, 75793 is not a valid port.
00:56.47p3nguinValid ports are 0-65535.
00:59.47kessiusis true tha range are 0-65535. - even with 127.0.0.1:75793
01:00.02p3nguin127.0.0.1:75793   <----- invalid
01:00.20p3nguinAnd chan_sip will only listen on one port, anyway.
01:01.36*** join/#asterisk DaPrivateer (~matt7229@71-9-155-174.static.oxfr.ma.charter.com)
01:03.06kessiusp3nguin - I want to implement this - http://www.personal.psu.edu/wcs131/blogs/psuvoip/2011/12/
01:06.32michael-ikessius: you're confusing a port with a sip peer/uri
01:06.48michael-iyou only need to bind to 5050 as far as I can see
01:11.42*** part/#asterisk vinhdizzo (~vinh@dhcp-v022-171.mobile.uci.edu)
01:12.48*** join/#asterisk SaRSAeOL (~sarsaeol@66-113-78-49.rev.ibsinc.com)
01:13.12SaRSAeOLhas anyone played with the new Digium IP phones?
01:13.33SaRSAeOLi have a few D70s i am configuring that are getting abysmal voice quality
01:13.59[TK]D-Fenderkessius: You cannot bind to multiple ports.
01:14.05kessiushow to make for configure  *  link or bind a  channel  with a port 127.0.0.1:0-65535  -
01:14.23[TK]D-Fenderkessius: You can't.  End of story.
01:16.55*** join/#asterisk voipnation_ (18b2d41a@gateway/web/freenode/ip.24.178.212.26)
01:17.30voipnation_Hi everyone. First time user here!
01:19.46*** join/#asterisk SaRSAeOL (~sarsaeol@66-113-78-49.rev.ibsinc.com)
01:20.49p3nguinLong time listener, first time caller?
01:22.12p3nguinkessius: No where on that page does anything say anything about port 75793.
01:22.56SaRSAeOLwould this be the wrong room for digium hardware inquiries?
01:22.57p3nguinIt does mention EXTENSION 75973, though.
01:23.24p3nguinIt isn't a room, it's an IRC channel.
01:23.37SaRSAeOLpardon, is this the wrong channel
01:23.41p3nguinAnd it isn't necessarily the wrong channel.  It's just the wrong time of day.
01:24.03p3nguinThere are like five people paying attention right now.
01:24.09p3nguinYou and I are two of those.
01:24.39SaRSAeOLlol okay i can live with that
01:24.42SaRSAeOLthanks p3nguin
01:25.06p3nguinYou can also contact Digium support, but they won't answer at this time of day, either.
01:25.22SaRSAeOLyeah that was plan A
01:25.34SaRSAeOL;)
01:25.59voipnation_what hardware are you speaking of SaRSeOL?
01:26.05SaRSAeOLD70
01:26.11SaRSAeOLon of their new IUP phones
01:26.12SaRSAeOLIP*
01:26.52voipnation_ahhh... can't help as I haven't had a chance to order one yet
01:27.22SaRSAeOLthey look nice… have had horrendous audio though… hoping its some config option i have overlooked
01:27.51voipnation_Horrendous how?
01:28.06SaRSAeOLdigital distortion
01:28.45voipnation_what version of asterisk are you running?
01:28.50[TK]D-FenderSaRSAeOL: What codec?  Call within the local lan?  What is the other end using?  What are netowrking conditions like?  What alternative settings have you tried?
01:29.22[TK]D-FenderSaRSAeOL: Who shot J.R.?  What is the average airspeed velocity of an unladen swallow?  What would you do for a Klondike bar?
01:29.34SaRSAeOLif A is digium phone and B is polycom, calling A to B produces robotic voice of  A speaker
01:29.39SaRSAeOLasterisk 1.8
01:29.47SaRSAeOLulaw
01:29.55SaRSAeOLwithin LAN
01:30.08voipnation_What about B to A?
01:30.16SaRSAeOLB to A is crystal clear
01:30.28voipnation_have you got a pcap of the call yet?
01:30.51SaRSAeOL[TK]D-Fender: African or Asian swallow
01:30.52SaRSAeOL?
01:31.00SaRSAeOLi do
01:31.05SaRSAeOLsignaling looks normal
01:31.20SaRSAeOLi think it may have to do with how the digium phone is setting up the RTP stream
01:31.27[TK]D-FenderSaRSAeOL: Thorough.... good.  What codec?
01:31.27voipnation_if you decode the RTP stream can you hear the digitized problem?
01:31.48SaRSAeOL[TK]D-Fender: I've tried g711u and a
01:31.57kessiusp3nguin friends - I have a fxo hardware-pci and only configure the extensions.conf [inbound_fxo] -how to *  receive call if not 127.0.0.1:? - it is mult ports
01:31.58SaRSAeOLvoipnation_: yes
01:32.28[TK]D-FenderSaRSAeOL: check the packetization rate between them... that is about the only thing I might wonder about at this point.  In an enclosed LAN you really shouldn't have these kinds of issues
01:32.59[TK]D-FenderSaRSAeOL: If RTP flows through * and you have timing issues for something like a VM (only thing I can think of) then perhaps as well... but even then low odds
01:33.10SaRSAeOL[TK]D-Fender: sort of my frustration exactly, the packetization is at 20ms
01:33.29voipnation_have you tried .030
01:33.52SaRSAeOLso 30 ms
01:33.52SaRSAeOL?
01:33.55voipnation_ya
01:34.00SaRSAeOLill give it a shot
01:34.03*** join/#asterisk wudles (~wudles@gateway.secureinstrument.com)
01:34.14[TK]D-FenderSaRSAeOL: Ok, all sounding standard... I'm suspecting you'll need to call Digium support very directly for this.  Because there is virtually no way I'd suspect the Polycom side of this without something solid pointing to it..
01:35.06SaRSAeOL[TK]D-Fender: yeah and I've tried polycom to polycom with the exact same config with zero issues
01:35.26SaRSAeOL[TK]D-Fender: digium support is first on my to do for the morning
01:35.41voipnation_Have you tried calling a Polycom outside the LAN?
01:36.16SaRSAeOLnot a polycom, but I've tried to a pstn line with the same result… for what its worth
01:36.56voipnation_I am unsure how to private message as this is like day 0 of using IRC. But you could try calling me. I have a 670 sitting here.
01:37.45SaRSAeOLsent you a PM
01:38.13[TK]D-FenderSaRSAeOL: Multiple different end points with same result on Digium side = Digium Phone issue.  Simple scientific process
01:38.33p3nguinvoipnation_: /query nickname
01:38.47[TK]D-FenderSaRSAeOL: And those phones are so very new that there isn't really an experience base to go around.
01:39.09voipnation_Correct but it sure is fun troubleshooting generic RTP issues
01:39.26SaRSAeOL[TK]D-Fender: i'm leaning heavily in that direction as well
01:39.43SaRSAeOLthere isn't even a comprehensive user guide out there
01:39.47SaRSAeOLis frusterating
01:40.07voipnation_what model of polycom are you using
01:40.10[TK]D-FenderSaRSAeOL: I admit I was looking forward to getting my hands on one for evaluation....
01:42.10kessiusp3nguin michael-i thank you, really i'm confusing a port with a sip peer/uri
01:43.10voipnation_Yea that sounded very trashy lol
01:43.47SaRSAeOLlol yeah so my initial review for the digium phones is not stellar, hopefully support will be able to shed some light on the situation
01:44.25voipnation_It almost sounds like a busted mic. Definitely not a typical sounding RTP issue. Never heard that one before.
01:46.38SaRSAeOLeven worse that it is happening over all the digium phones i have tried (3)
01:46.51SaRSAeOLwhich makes me think config over hardware
01:47.43[TK]D-FenderOr firmware...
01:48.15voipnation_have you tried removing all codecs but g729
01:48.48p3nguinkessius: No, you are confusing port number with EXTENSION.
01:49.02p3nguinThat page talks about EXTENSION 75973.
01:49.22voipnation_It really seems like two different compressions of the same codec
01:49.34p3nguinCompressions?
01:49.40*** join/#asterisk ios_sos (~nbeard@24-181-146-94.static.dlth.mn.charter.com)
01:49.48p3nguinulaw isn't compressed.
01:50.20kessiusp3nguin -  michael-i     for Incoming calls will ring sip:75973@127.0.0.1  - how to configure sip.conf or only extensions
01:51.00voipnation_p3nguin, i understand that
01:54.48voipnation_[TK]D-Fender do you think it could be comfort noise causing the bad audio?
01:55.33SaRSAeOLvoipnation_: comfort noise?
01:55.51[TK]D-Fendervoipnation_: No.. because VOICE is distorted, not just silence between.
01:56.52[TK]D-Fenderkessius: Make your peer to match your incoming call and point it to a context.  then make your extension to match what they dialed
01:57.26kessiusp3nguin -  michael-i  - register = username:password@127.0.0.1:75973
01:57.26kessius<PROTECTED>
01:59.07voipnation_Anyone here had a chance to test the Grandstream 3175? Having very poor results with it, just wondering others thoughts.
01:59.51voipnation_Online reviews seem decent. I wouldn't give this phone half a star /5 so there is no way everyone is having the same results im having.
02:05.06drfreezeAnyone know how to get a hangup event when checking voicemail?
02:05.08drfreezeHave a client that is missing voicemails. They think that their hangup cases when checking voicemail are related to the missing voicemail
02:06.13SaRSAeOL[TK]D-Fender: and voipnation_ the problem is gone by disabling support for g726-32… even though the call was not using it and it was at the lowest priority… it must be a bug in firmware
02:06.33SaRSAeOLeven though I'm still wondering how its not my fault
02:06.38SaRSAeOLlol
02:06.50SaRSAeOLhugs [TK]D-Fender and voipnation_
02:07.09[TK]D-FenderSaRSAeOL: "If a tree falls in the forest, and there is noone around to hear it .... is the man still wrong?"
02:07.19[TK]D-Fender- women
02:07.28*** join/#asterisk scubes13 (~scubes13@cpe-024-168-196-000.sc.res.rr.com)
02:07.54voipnation_What codec could we use to hear said tree?
02:08.44voipnation_Sarsaeol... Good to hear... sorry we couldn't help
02:08.56voipnation_although i will take credit for it anyway
02:09.48p3nguinkessius: sip:75973@127.0.0.1 is EXTENSION 75973.  Extensions are configured in extensions.conf.
02:13.56kessiusp3nguin:  then I can configure only extensions.conf [75973]
02:16.05kessiusp3nguin : or [default]  exten=>75973,1...  / and on sip.con  peer and context
02:16.37p3nguin[75973] would be a context named 75973.
02:16.52p3nguinChoose a better context, then create extension 75973.
02:17.12p3nguinI'm not going to teach you asterisk configuration today.
02:17.27p3nguinYou can read the book just like everyone else who needs to know how to configure it.
02:27.51*** join/#asterisk voipnation (~voipnatio@24-178-212-26.static.ftwo.tx.charter.com)
02:29.07voipnationso Sars, I got disconnected. Is all well now?
02:29.18*** join/#asterisk vinhdizzo (~vinh@cpe-66-74-182-202.socal.res.rr.com)
02:34.56SaRSAeOLvoipnation: indeed it is, conferring the remainder of the phones so i can get the h3ll outta here
02:35.07SaRSAeOLdamn auto correct… configuring*
02:36.31SaRSAeOLthen tomorrow i get the fun part of loading the Digium Phones Module for Asterisk
02:36.36SaRSAeOLall kinds of cool features with that
02:38.39voipnationI hear that. This stuff will consume your life if you let it LOL.. I let it unfortunately
02:39.20voipnationWhen I wake, to when I sleep. Always messing around with my PBX. Learning, tweaking, destroying all kinds of stuff :)
02:40.51kessius<PROTECTED>
02:41.41voipnationAnyone have any experience with compiling perl
02:43.49p3nguinkessius: That is very broken.
02:43.56voipnationim trying to install something called Time.Duration.pm and have no clue where to put it
02:44.07voipnationtime/duration.pm
02:44.20p3nguinWhat is it?
02:44.53p3nguinIt seems like something that belongs in /usr/share/perl5/vendor_perl/ -ish.
02:45.07voipnationhttp://search.cpan.org/~sburke/Time-Duration-1.02/Duration.pm
02:45.26p3nguin/usr/share/perl5/vendor_perl/Time/  on my box.
02:45.48p3nguinI don't have Duration.pm, though, only Zone.pm.
02:46.13[TK]D-Fenderkessiusp3nguin : because not words - http://pastebin.com/5aQqiMYy <- I presume you mean "doesn't work"
02:46.16voipnationK thx. Ill try and figure it out. Someone I know wrote a custom program to view tenant CDR's and without it i get errors
02:46.39p3nguinThere.  -r--r--r-- 1 root root 14412 Aug 18  2007 /usr/share/perl5/vendor_perl/Time/Duration.pm
02:46.39[TK]D-Fenderkessius:   exten=>7597,1,Dial(SIP/1101,60,wWrtT) <- and as far as you've described... this SHOULDN'T work
02:47.08[TK]D-Fenderkessius: 7597 != 75973
02:47.09p3nguinI just isntalled perl-time-duration
02:47.52p3nguinThat's an old module.
02:49.02p3nguinI guess on CentOS, it is perl-Time-Duration.
02:50.25p3nguinNot sure which distro you are using.
02:51.36voipnationyes running centos
02:51.47*** join/#asterisk mintos (~mvaliyav@114.143.165.128)
02:51.53voipnationI suppose i just navigate to that directory and explode the tarball there?
02:52.02voipnationI was thinking it would be a little more involved
02:54.03voipnationI don' evne have a perl directory under /usr/share
02:54.04p3nguinno
02:54.11p3nguinyum -y install perl-Time-Duration
02:54.22p3nguinWe have package managers for a reason.
02:55.08p3nguinIf you haven't installed rpmforge, you probably need to do that first.
02:55.27p3nguinLots of useful stuff in rpmforge that you'll want over time.
02:56.15p3nguinNot sure how to do that?  See http://wiki.centos.org/AdditionalResources/Repositories/RPMForge
02:58.07p3nguin~rpmforge
02:58.07infobotRPMforge is a collaboration of Dag and other packagers. They provide over 5000 packages for CentOS, including wine, vlc, mplayer, xmms-mp3, and other popular media tools. It is not part of Red Hat or CentOS but is designed to work with those distributions.  http://wiki.centos.org/AdditionalResources/Repositories/RPMForge
02:59.31voipnationTHanks so much. Now that I jogged my memory. Not having the right repo was where I left off last time.
03:02.31voipnationmaybe it will have something needed to benchmark my raid configuration
03:18.59*** join/#asterisk saliak (~kailas@ip68-9-228-184.ri.ri.cox.net)
03:28.36*** join/#asterisk gonewage (~gonewage@c-68-54-124-223.hsd1.il.comcast.net)
03:29.09*** part/#asterisk gonewage (~gonewage@c-68-54-124-223.hsd1.il.comcast.net)
03:36.04*** join/#asterisk ruben23 (~user@112.205.68.8)
03:36.12ruben23hi guys
03:37.05ruben23hi guys how do i optmized asterisk for voip calls..? any idea..?
03:38.06kessius[TK]D-Fender, thank you   -  this was ok -7597 != 75973  -  but when call 75973  not  appears in console *  -
03:38.52[TK]D-Fenderkessius: Where do we see your SIP DEBUG for your failed call?
03:39.47[TK]D-Fenderruben23: Google up "Asterisk QoS"
03:40.22kessius<PROTECTED>
03:40.38[TK]D-Fenderkessius: place your call
03:42.46kessius<PROTECTED>
03:43.09p3nguinYou should have read the book.
03:43.43[TK]D-Fenderkessius: What part of "there is no port over 65535" do you not understand about the TCP/IP stack?
03:44.09[TK]D-Fenderkessius: And you are jumping topics again
03:44.41[TK]D-Fenderkessius: First you're asking about dialplan, then you're asking about REGISTRATION which is completely different.  Pick something to fix and stick with it
03:44.46kessius<PROTECTED>
03:44.51[TK]D-Fenderkessius: You are going around in cirecles and getting nothing finished
03:45.01[TK]D-Fendercircles*
03:46.23*** join/#asterisk mchou (~quassel@unaffiliated/mchou)
03:48.06kessius[TK]D-Fender sip set debug on   to  75973
03:49.22p3nguinYou can't sip set debug on an extension.
03:49.35[TK]D-Fenderkessius: NO.  Do not attempt to restict your debugging.  look at ALL traffic
03:49.46[TK]D-Fenderp3nguin: It's also a peername on his config
03:50.04[TK]D-Fenderp3nguin: But still bad to restrict right now
03:50.49p3nguinWell, that guide said extension 75973 on host 127.0.0.1.  I didn't see any mention of any peers.
03:52.29[TK]D-Fenderp3nguin: He mentioned it and was visible in one of his pastebins...
03:52.39[TK]D-Fenderp3nguin: http://pastebin.com/5aQqiMYy
03:52.50p3nguinI quit paying attention to him after a while.
03:52.58p3nguinIt's too irritating to say the same things over and over and over.
03:53.02[TK]D-Fenderp3nguin: Yeah, I can relate...
03:54.36ruben23guys i ahve asterisk server on my network and im concerned about, when i try to register phone extensions on it im getting latency 100ms above for those extensions but this is only on local network..any idea what could be the reasons for it..? when i tried ping test form server to PC i get below 1 ms..but on asterisk CLI i get 100ms
03:55.07p3nguinYou can't measure latency of an extension.  Extensions have no round-trip times to be measured.
03:55.24*** part/#asterisk paolosupino (~paolo-sup@net-2-38-113-188.cust.dsl.vodafone.it)
03:55.29p3nguinAlso, Asterisk CLI does not have any ping tools.
03:55.41p3nguinAsterisk is not capable of ICMP at the network layer.
03:56.21p3nguinIf you are using the qualify time for a PEER, you cannot compare it to ping time of a HOST.
03:57.04p3nguinAsterisk qualify time of a PEER measures the response to a SIP OPTIONS packet in the application layer.
03:57.30p3nguinWhy must everyone think these two things are the same?
03:57.47Kobazbecause it makes sense to assume that if you don't know how sip works
03:57.57p3nguinoh  :/
03:57.58Kobazpeople think response time = icmp ping
03:58.17Kobazsome people don't know any other way
03:58.36p3nguins/ other way/thing/
03:59.01Kobazheh
03:59.06p3nguinI soooooo wish infobot would do corrections on other people's text.
03:59.30p3nguinThat would make things so much more amusing.
03:59.44Kobazit does on #asterisk-dev
03:59.53p3nguinOH?!
03:59.53Kobazoh
03:59.56Kobazother people
03:59.58*** join/#asterisk gajini (~root@61.12.17.171)
04:00.00Kobazit doesnt do other peolpe
04:00.00Kobazheh
04:00.00p3nguinawww
04:00.07p3nguinYou ruined my hopes.
04:00.11Kobazheh
04:00.19Kobazdashed all hopes!
04:00.54[TK]D-FenderActually... its not so much a SIP thing as it is an Asterisk thing.   It could have used ICMP as a validation tool, but that is often filtered, etc.  Also as SIP is an application layer routed protocol it's fail at the proxy level.  But that is not apparent to people new to larger setups.
04:01.09[TK]D-Fenderit'll*
04:01.35[TK]D-FenderKobaz: h-o-p-e-s <- THERE I FIXED IT
04:01.36Kobazepic fail at the proxy level
04:01.58p3nguinI would have guessed that the reason SIP packets are used for measuring it was that the phones are using SIP, so that's a common denominator.
04:02.30[TK]D-Fenderp3nguin: Routing is the real reason....
04:02.33Kobazone more feature
04:02.36Kobazthat's all i need
04:02.37Kobazdo de do
04:06.00ruben23p3nguin:thanks for the info you give so the 100 ms for qualify is somehow ok..?
04:06.25Kobazbasically that tells you that the peer is reachable
04:06.34Kobazbrain dead servers might even be 2000ms
04:06.42Kobazbut your actual sip call quality would be fine
04:06.45Kobazit depends on the server
04:07.09Kobazit tells you how long the remote host took to respond to your sip options request
04:08.23[TK]D-Fenderruben23: Yes
04:10.15ruben23thanks guys.
04:14.01p3nguinI do not worry over 100 ms qualify time.
04:14.21Kobazspilled milk is not much to worry about either
04:14.34p3nguinNot when you have a wife to clean it up, anyway.
04:14.53ruben23or helper..
04:14.58p3nguinOh crap, I thought she was walking over here to read what I just typed.
04:15.05Kobazmanservant
04:15.11p3nguinBut she was headed somewhere else.
04:15.15p3nguintiming
04:21.43p3nguinThis is interesting psychology.  I deployed an office with multi-line phones.  I configured two line keys on each phone:  one line key showed a display name of the 10-digit phone number next to the button, the other line key showed the internal extension number used to reach the phone.  I just checked the CDRs from a specimen phone, and most of the time when dialing an external number, she was using the line key showing the ...
04:21.49p3nguin... 10-digit phone number.
04:22.08p3nguinBoth line keys had the exact same capabilities.  The only difference was the display name next to the button on the phone.
04:22.36Kobazheh
04:22.39Kobazit
04:22.41Kobaz's all the same
04:22.48Kobazpeople do what they are used to
04:22.56Kobaz"grab an outside line"
04:23.13p3nguinNow I move on to phase two of the test.  I removed the second line key, so now there is only one line key active and it shows the internal extension number as the display name next to the button.
04:23.38Kobazeveryone is going to think they can't dial outside anymore
04:23.41p3nguinI'll see how they react.
04:24.03p3nguinOnly the receptionist has more than one active button now.
04:24.33Kobaz"let's watch their reaction as we swap their favorite milk chocolate with iodine and food coloring"
04:24.44p3nguinExternal calls ring into the second line key which shows the 10-digit number.  Calls from other phones in the office will ring into the first line which shows the internal number.
04:25.15Kobazwhat if they are already on the phone on line 1
04:25.18Kobazand they get an internal call
04:25.24p3nguinvoicemail
04:25.53p3nguinI had to shut off call waiting because people don't understand what a ringing phone means.
04:26.10p3nguinNow each phone only gets one call at a time.
04:26.16Kobazhah
04:26.23p3nguinIf you're on the phone, a call to your phone goes directly to busy vm.
04:26.27p3nguinPeople are so silly.
04:26.44Kobazi set up a new office and they want direct dials for everyone
04:26.55Kobazno main ivr, no attendant phone
04:28.01p3nguinThe complaint I got was, "When I call, it just rings and rings and rings before finally saying the person is on the phone."  Okay, so they want no ringing if the person is on the phone.  Got it.  No more call waiting.
04:28.28Kobazwell just make it ring like two times if someone is on the phone
04:28.33*** join/#asterisk ferdna (~ferdna@cpe-67-10-220-35.elp.res.rr.com)
04:28.40p3nguinIf people would answer their beeps and use hold like a normal person, it wouldn't have been an issue.
04:28.59p3nguinI suppose I could do that.
04:29.17p3nguinCheck the channels and adjust the ring time.
04:29.33p3nguinI actually hadn't considered that.
04:30.08p3nguinThe complaint was about ringing just to ultimately end up in busy vm, so I eliminated the ringing aspect of it.
04:30.50p3nguinNext they will probably complain about ringing and unavailable vm when the person isn't on the phone but just doesn't answer.
04:32.15p3nguinAt that point, I may tell them to take a walk to the other person's office before calling them just to make sure he or she is there to answer.  *sigh*
04:34.11*** join/#asterisk ChannelZ (channelz@burner.com)
04:49.05drfreezep3nguin: funny stuff
04:49.40drfreezepeople have no clue about how phone systems operate
04:50.02drfreezeor impractical most of their suggestions are
04:50.23*** join/#asterisk bandroidx (~bandroidx@2607:f358:1:fed5:5:0:558:12)
04:51.36*** part/#asterisk Marquel (~Marquel@unaffiliated/marquel)
04:52.13*** part/#asterisk ruben23 (~user@112.205.68.8)
04:58.37*** join/#asterisk gerhard7 (~gerhard7@82-168-115-40.ip.telfort.nl)
05:02.14Kobazhah
05:02.14Kobazyeah
05:02.18Kobazi have a good one for that
05:02.32Kobazso there's a three phone ring group for the operator at this place
05:02.39Kobaz5pm two of the people leave
05:03.10Kobazthe front desk person forwards their phone and goes to the main office and sits at a cube at the forward destination
05:03.28Kobazthen she complains people are getting voicemail instead of ringing forever at the operator when she gets up for breaks
05:03.43Kobazif you don't want people getting voicemail, either dont forward your phone, or turn off voicemail
05:03.45Kobaz"yeah but"
05:04.15*** join/#asterisk din3sh (~din3sh@ADSL-TPLUS-111-164.telecomplus.net)
05:07.02*** join/#asterisk din3sh (~din3sh@ADSL-TPLUS-111-164.telecomplus.net)
05:09.21din3shmorning all
05:16.21MrOlimorning din3sh
05:22.23din3shthough its nitetime in US
05:22.24din3sh:p
05:22.35MrOliyup
05:23.36ChannelZIt's PANTS-OFF DANCE-OFF TIME!
05:24.23din3shhehe
05:24.28din3shits 10am here
05:31.18*** part/#asterisk asteriskmonkey (~darlek@74-51-38-204.telnetcommunications.com)
05:41.56*** join/#asterisk tm1000 (~tm1000@provisioner.net)
05:46.50*** join/#asterisk oej (~olle@h87-96-134-129.dynamic.se.alltele.net)
05:49.27din3shhaving a problem Got SIP response 486 "Busy Here" back from sip peeers with no DND on phones
05:51.48MrOliis the sip peer sending the 486 a hardware ip phone ?
05:51.55din3shyes
05:53.05MrOliwhat's the model# ?
05:53.35din3shatcom
05:54.25din3shthere's no DND activated
05:55.32MrOliand it was working fine before, or it's always been like that ?
05:55.56din3shwas working ok
05:56.05MrOliwhat's the model# ?
05:56.09din3shnow its more frequent
05:56.14din3shatcom AT620
05:58.28MrOlidownloading manual
05:59.25MrOlithe manufacturer must have a modem to host their website.. 30mns to download a 2MB PDF file!
06:00.25din3shwoooo
06:00.25din3shwhats your bandwidth?
06:00.25din3shspeed i mean
06:03.11*** join/#asterisk din3sh (~din3sh@41.212.203.135)
06:03.13MrOli20MB
06:03.20din3shwow!
06:03.30din3shstill 30mins to download the manual
06:07.52p3nguin20 MegaBytes of what?
06:08.07din3shi have been unable to replicate the same scenario with same settings
06:08.09*** join/#asterisk pa (~pa@unaffiliated/pa)
06:08.20p3nguinI'd guess the phone is in use.
06:08.37p3nguinIf there is no DND(busy), then it must be in use.
06:08.39din3shi've set call-limit to 6
06:08.43MrOlip3nguin: i was thinking of that, with a call limit issue
06:08.54p3nguinDoesn't mean the phone supports more than one call.
06:09.08p3nguinCheck the call waiting option.
06:09.18din3shok let me check
06:10.46p3nguinI'm not familiar with that phone, but some phones allow users to turn call waiting on and off.
06:11.52MrOlidin3sh: are you able to login to the web configuration interface of the phones ?
06:13.11din3shyes can log in
06:17.19MrOliif you go under SIP/ Advanced SIP settings...
06:17.53MrOliis "ban anon call" checked ?
06:17.59MrOliwhat do you have under " forward type"  ?
06:19.11*** join/#asterisk schmidts (~schmidts@Lo20-rt01.lm33.sil.at)
06:19.13schmidtsgood morning
06:20.01*** join/#asterisk e7e5 (~rudenko@188.134.2.33)
06:20.45din3shMrOli: ban anon call is not checked
06:21.01MrOlidin3sh: also under " Call Service Setting" , there are several options that might play a role: "no disturb", "enable call waiting", and "accept any call"
06:21.04din3shFoward type = off
06:22.25din3shno disturb = not checked
06:22.53din3shenable call waiting =checked
06:23.04din3shaccept any call =checked
06:23.38din3shalso i tried 2 simultaneous calls on a test phone jst now, it receives the 2nd call alright
06:24.11din3shon a 3rd call, i get ERROR[17115]: chan_sip.c:3283 update_call_counter: Call to peer '7665' rejected due to usage limit of 2
06:24.26din3shdue to the call-limit 2 i have set in sip_buddies
06:24.43din3shmeans phone can receive more than 1 call
06:24.59din3shthe sip 486 is no on a production box
06:26.16din3sham unable to replicate the sip 486 at my office :/
06:28.55din3shI get sip 480 busy here if i set DND on the phone, not 486 error
06:28.56din3sh:s
06:32.14*** join/#asterisk vfabi (~fabi@host-static-93-116-255-140.moldtelecom.md)
06:35.14din3sh:'(
06:39.36*** join/#asterisk hehol (~hehol@2001:1438:1009:200:bd5f:fbbf:7e33:fffd)
06:46.10*** join/#asterisk freeman_u (~freeman@gw.quart-soft.net)
06:48.54*** join/#asterisk oej (~olle@2001:16d8:cc57:1000::42:1006)
06:55.57*** join/#asterisk dandre (~daniel@ble59-2-81-56-122-47.fbx.proxad.net)
06:57.07*** join/#asterisk mcaj (mcaj@nat/novell/x-nhtnhtmctmfffbxs)
07:01.56*** join/#asterisk ndemir (~ndemir@85.105.28.77)
07:02.14schmidtsdin3sh DND produces mostly a busy
07:02.49ndemirHello. I have an asterisk server. I want to call outbound via SIP with my analog phones. Can i do this with a FXS card?
07:03.19din3shwhat would be the cause of the 486 busy if DND is not active?
07:03.21*** join/#asterisk Boohbah (~Boohbah@gateway/tor-sasl/boohbah)
07:04.06*** part/#asterisk Boohbah (~Boohbah@gateway/tor-sasl/boohbah)
07:04.32schmidtsdin3sh sorry my fault 486 is busy here, 480 means temporary unavailable so 486 is right
07:05.03schmidtsand you can get it back when the phone is in use and you dont have call waiting deactivated
07:05.33*** join/#asterisk asterisk-Tester (~RAMYT@193.227.170.247)
07:07.18*** join/#asterisk lucky (~lucky@unaffiliated/lucky)
07:08.07ndemirHello. I have an asterisk server. I want to call outbound via SIP with my analog phones. Can i do this with a FXS card?
07:08.19schmidtsndemir yes
07:08.34ndemirschmidts: thanks
07:09.37luckyHi folks, I realize this is a bit off topic but I was hoping someone might know.. are there any commercial providers or services that will enable regular SMS to a DID pass through to SIP clients normally, or some other similarly workable approach?
07:13.31ChannelZhttp://www.vitelity.com/services/sms
07:15.09ChannelZAlthough I'm not positive by what means they deliver the service
07:17.12*** join/#asterisk WIMPy (~wimpy@e183095026.adsl.alicedsl.de)
07:18.51*** join/#asterisk c0rnoTa (~c0rnoTa@78.24.154.190)
07:19.22*** part/#asterisk c0rnoTa (~c0rnoTa@78.24.154.190)
07:25.56*** join/#asterisk wonderworld (~ww@dsdf-4db54223.pool.mediaWays.net)
07:30.24*** join/#asterisk bulkorok (~bulkorok@217.110.197.225)
07:31.17*** join/#asterisk joecool (~joecool@no-sources/joecool)
07:31.55joecoolis there any way to get better debug info out of reload_conf... I uninstalled and reinstalled the feature code module in freepbx and it broke something
07:32.09joecoolattempting to reload conf in freepbx throws out
07:32.10joecoolReload failed because retrieve_conf encountered an error: 20
07:32.14beardyWhere do you think you are?
07:32.43beardy#freepbx is ----> over there
07:33.53joecoolok
07:34.45din3sh:)
07:35.51joecoolon the topic of asterisk still, reload_conf is a part of asterisk
07:35.57joecoolcan I get better output out of it?
07:36.02joecool-bash-3.2$ ./retrieve_conf --debug
07:36.03joecoolChecking for PEAR Console::Getopt..OK
07:36.03joecoolAborting reload because extension conflicts or bad destinations
07:36.06joecool^^ this does not help me
07:48.41*** join/#asterisk Qwell (~north@pdpc/sponsor/digium/Qwell)
07:48.42*** mode/#asterisk [+o Qwell] by ChanServ
07:48.55*** join/#asterisk darkskiez (~mhb@fsf/member/darkskiez)
07:59.26Guggejoecool: reload_conf? where is that in asterisk?
08:00.43joecoolretrieve_conf I meant
08:01.17joecool(it was a typo, the prompt i pasted showed the correction)
08:02.58din3shThe device state of this queue member, SIP/xxxx, is still 'Not in Use' when it probably should not be! Please check UPGRADE.txt for correct configuration settings.
08:03.08din3shwhere is upgrade.txt?
08:03.13din3shsorry for stupid question
08:04.03*** join/#asterisk felimwhiteley (~quassel@089-101-203026.ntlworld.ie)
08:11.50*** join/#asterisk sekil (~sekil@78.24.104.73)
08:19.59Guggejoecool: retrieve_conf seems like something that uses php / pear ... what makes you think it is part of asterisk?
08:20.31Guggedin3sh: in the source tgz
08:20.32joecoolits location
08:20.38joecoolin /var/lib/asterisk/bin/
08:20.48Guggejoecool: well, it has nothing to do with asterisk
08:21.22joecoolit's a rather stupid location to be thrown then if it has nothing to do with asterisk
08:21.28Gugge#freepbx is rather stupid
08:21.50Gugges/#//
08:23.47*** join/#asterisk Faustov (user@gentoo/user/faustov)
08:25.09din3shwhy is freepbx not good?
08:26.06*** part/#asterisk ndemir (~ndemir@85.105.28.77)
08:27.13GuggeIts probably fine. I dont use it. And imho its messy.
08:27.36GuggeAnd this channel does not support it. #freepbx does.
08:27.50joecoolit's friggin insecure too
08:27.53din3shelastix also messy?
08:29.17din3shdoesnt have any freepbx in prod :)
08:32.26*** join/#asterisk Dovid (~Dovid@office.mypbxmanager.net)
08:43.48*** join/#asterisk tzafrir_laptop (~tzafrir@local.xorcom.com)
08:44.58*** join/#asterisk sezuan (bouncer@irc.scheff32.de)
08:48.21*** join/#asterisk Tim_Toady (~moi@130.43.51.201.dsl.dyn.forthnet.gr)
09:18.48*** join/#asterisk brian98 (~brian98@188.141.12.34)
09:38.39*** join/#asterisk Azrael808 (~peter@212.161.9.162)
09:41.46din3shhow to use loadtest.tcl?
09:46.40*** join/#asterisk FiReSTaRT (~dlyh@unaffiliated/firestart)
09:48.49*** join/#asterisk jacc0 (~jacc0@D522448D.static.ziggozakelijk.nl)
09:49.45jacc0hi all!
09:50.56jacc0how can I use values from database as [globals] in extensions.conf?
09:52.00wdoekes2jacc0: if they're mutable, they shouldn't be global. if they're not mutable, why are they in the db?
09:52.52jacc0they are mutable (DTMFToneLenght and InterDTMFTimeout)
09:53.32jacc0but I don't want to access the database everytime I send dtmf, and not even in with every incomming connection
09:54.11jacc0It would generate a lot of useless load on mysql
09:54.33jacc0because the are only configured once; when the project gets deployed
09:55.16wdoekes2if they're configured once, I wouldn't call them mutable
09:56.43wdoekes2perhaps you need to write them in your xyz.conf when deploying (#include extensions_site_specific.conf) or load the extensions.conf from the db (static realtime)
09:57.39*** join/#asterisk Maliuta (~nobusines@kiev.lusan.id.au)
09:59.57kaldemarjacc0: or "#exec <script>" under [globals], where <script> is something that outputs those variables. maybe.
10:04.53jacc0:) damn, kaldemar
10:05.10jacc0nice sollution
10:05.39jacc0:)
10:05.49din3shi get this when answering a call on Snom360 [logger.c: RTCP SR transmission error, rtcp halted]
10:05.54din3shany idea y?
10:07.40jacc0make sure all your SIP phones have silence suppression set to OFF
10:16.10jacc0din3sh: http://www.tek-tips.com/viewthread.cfm?qid=1341194
10:17.25din3shwith the same phone, when it transfers to another phone and then re-transfer to a third phone
10:17.39din3shcaller hears only MOH, callee hears caller talking
10:17.49din3shmight be related to rtcp prob ?
10:18.36jacc0try disabeling canreinvite or directmedia
10:18.42jacc0in sip.conf
10:19.22din3shno directmedia in 1.4.x
10:19.32jacc0true,
10:19.39jacc0it's canreinvite in 1.4
10:19.54jacc0correct me if i'm wrong
10:20.11din3shyes
10:20.20din3shset it to no for that peer?
10:23.27*** join/#asterisk oej (~olle@h87-96-134-129.dynamic.se.alltele.net)
10:32.33*** join/#asterisk roham (~ali@31.184.187.2)
10:35.54*** join/#asterisk kl4m (~kl4m@gw2.noc1.sys-tech.net)
10:37.36*** join/#asterisk fisted (~fisted@unaffiliated/fisted)
10:45.10jacc0yes
10:45.20jacc0maybe set it to no for all clients
10:46.06din3sh:/
10:46.08din3shi tried
10:46.16din3shcanreinvite already no
10:46.20din3shnot helping
10:46.29din3shstill with the rtcp error
10:55.01*** join/#asterisk hariom (~hariom@115.118.173.77)
10:59.34*** join/#asterisk ermali82 (~ermalkris@213.207.42.45)
11:01.17ermali82does anyone have success with UUI "USERUSERINFO" ?
11:22.06*** part/#asterisk hariom (~hariom@115.118.173.77)
11:22.32jacc0did you do a 'sip reload' after setting canreinvite =no ?
11:23.52din3shit was already running with canreinvite=no
11:24.03din3shits jst a notice i guess
11:24.11din3shcoz it doesnt break the call flow
11:24.35kaldemarermali82: did you modify source to enable it and recompile?
11:33.58din3shmy main problem remains double transfers, callee can only hear moh
11:34.09din3sheven if call has been transfered
11:34.37*** join/#asterisk thecardsmith (~doug@pdpc/supporter/student/thecardsmith)
11:34.50*** part/#asterisk lwbnet (~luke@194.71.111.4)
11:36.15jurij1after restoring 32bit freepbx backup to 64bit i get: WARNING[4999] loader.c: Unable to open modules directory '/usr/lib/asterisk/modules'.
11:36.26jurij1how do i set path to /usr/lib64/...?
11:41.19*** join/#asterisk usrb1n (~pixfix@174.163.216.87.static.jazztel.es)
11:46.13*** join/#asterisk leifmadsen (~Leif@asterisk/documenteur-extraordinaire/blitzrage)
11:46.13*** mode/#asterisk [+o leifmadsen] by ChanServ
11:49.42*** join/#asterisk tompaw (~tompaw@slave30.tesserakt.eu)
11:52.24wdoekes2jurij1: astmoddir in asterisk.conf ?
11:53.30*** join/#asterisk devmikey (~irc@unaffiliated/devmikey)
11:58.31*** join/#asterisk tamiel (~tamiel@85-171-171-179.rev.numericable.fr)
11:59.31*** join/#asterisk Bullmoose (~Bullmoose@65-129-15-179.bois.qwest.net)
12:06.42*** join/#asterisk [TK]D-Fender (~aoulton@216.191.106.162)
12:06.59*** join/#asterisk vipkilla (~chatzilla@unaffiliated/t-dot-zilla/x-2830497)
12:07.16*** join/#asterisk bmg505 (~leon@196-209-123-205.dynamic.isadsl.co.za)
12:09.29ermali82kaldemar: modifyed sig_pri.c to enable USERUSERINFO but still cant set the value to a variable
12:10.09ermali82by enablind debuging "pri intense debug span X" i see the useruserinfo
12:13.11WIMPySince when is UUS supported?
12:14.25*** join/#asterisk gusto (~gusto@nrbg-4dbe1fdb.pool.mediaWays.net)
12:14.30gustots
12:14.43gustoi had a partial success on my be-converged voip
12:15.20gustotoday i managed to get through ... but when i tried to call my telephone i got "die von ihnen gewaehlte rufnummer ist VON IHREM ANSCHLUSS NICHT ERREICHBAR"
12:15.42gustoso ... my asterisk runs on openwrt so it does not have sound bullshitting installed
12:15.52*** join/#asterisk albertoandrade (~albertoan@186.212.37.227)
12:15.55WIMPySo that was not a geo number?
12:15.55gustoso i am sure that it was the telefonica provider
12:16.05gustoha?
12:16.08gustowhat is GEO?
12:16.16*** join/#asterisk Naikrovek (~mbluth@unaffiliated/naikrovek)
12:16.19WIMPygeographical
12:16.28WIMPyNot a service number.
12:16.42gustow8
12:16.45gustoi ll try
12:16.57gustodoesnt help
12:17.30gustow8
12:17.32*** join/#asterisk albertoandrade (~albertoan@186.212.37.227)
12:17.33WIMPyBTW: Where did you get an open account from Telefonica?
12:17.40*** part/#asterisk jurij1 (~jurij@213.215.248.66)
12:17.43gustoi try to reconfigure it once again, because i got BAD REQUEST URI NOW
12:17.45gustow8
12:19.00gustoshit
12:19.02gustodoes not help
12:19.09gustomaybe i should try another number
12:19.26gustoWIMPy: i got that through my dsl provider - endesha
12:19.47gustothe do sell dsl accounts and you get that VoIP for free ... either you use it or not
12:22.14WIMPyHeared that name for the first time. I only know the Alice accounts where you don't get your account data.
12:25.07bobb_WUcan someone give me advice on how to recompile dahdi for a new kernel?
12:25.14leifmadsenmake
12:25.46leifmadsenone you have the new kernels development modules installed, just run 'make install' again
12:25.53bobb_WUi'm on gentoo so i'm using emerge
12:26.06gustoWIMPy: i did have alice dsl too
12:26.06bobb_WUi'm running the new kernel and have tried recompile (through emerge) like 3 times
12:26.19leifmadsenthen that's not the question you asked -- use emerge to manage the modules then
12:26.44leifmadsensounds like you might want to check with gentoo to figure out why emerge can't help you then
12:26.50gustoWIMPy: that is cool, you get this shitty big dsl modem from bautzen and you connect your phone directly to there, but i am not sure if that is VoIP .. it maybe just Telephony over DSL
12:27.25gustoi am going to try another provider, maybe i get luck with getting at least ringing
12:27.25leifmadsengusto: I think that's just called PSTN :)
12:27.30WIMPygusto: No. It's SIP.
12:27.41bobb_WUyeah i'll head into gentoo's room to ask
12:27.42bobb_WUthanks leif
12:27.47gustoleifmadsen: no, because it is connected to the DSL modem
12:28.19gustoleifmadsen: it is not connected to the analogue phone, i got two phones simultaneously and could call myself ... one on analogue PSTN and then that alicedsl
12:28.28WIMPyleifmadsen: We don't have much PSTN left here.
12:28.37gustoWIMPy: where?
12:28.38leifmadsengusto: I was just entertained by the thought of "telephony over DSL"
12:28.47WIMPyGermany
12:28.52gustoleifmadsen: would be a good idea
12:29.07leifmadsenI think that's just either PSTN or VoIP :)
12:29.10gustoWIMPy: bullshit, here in germany there is everything done by analogue telephony, in slovakia too
12:29.13WIMPyIn DK they use VoDSL.
12:29.19gustoyes
12:29.22gustothat is a cool idea
12:29.31gustoVoDSL :-D
12:30.14gustobecause then you do not have all this shit like ATMinsideEthernetinsidePPPinsideEthernet and that all incubating IP
12:30.16WIMPyThen tell me where you get an analogue telephone line? DTAG is the only one an they will try to sell you VOIP as well.
12:30.39leifmadsenorders himself up some internet over ethernet
12:30.47gustoi got an analogue telephone from DT till february
12:30.52din3sh:D
12:30.53gustoand in slovakia i still have one
12:30.55gustoor more
12:31.05gustoand ISDN is also still around
12:31.06*** join/#asterisk ickmund (~ickmund@cli-5b7e85fd.bcn.adamo.es)
12:31.26gustoi mean the problem is the monopol of DTAG/GMBH in germany
12:31.27bobb_WUah i figured it out
12:31.36gustono surprise no one other sells it
12:31.38WIMPyYes, tey still exist, but it you want a new connection there are only few options left.
12:31.48gustowell, there is only one
12:31.58gustoeither you want a phone or you do not
12:32.14WIMPyYou can still get real ISDN from Vodafone.
12:32.22gustoso so
12:32.24gusto:-D
12:32.32leifmadsenbobb_WU: for posterity sake (logging) can you say what you ran into and how you fixed it?
12:33.11gustoin the meantime i sent a mail to my provider that i get this voice message that i can not call any number
12:33.14gustohowever
12:34.06WIMPyBTW: Are there any plans or has anyone heard any roumors about plans to support outgoing overlap dial in chan_sip?
12:34.20gustobtw. did you also noticed that the most VoIP providers are idiots? i mean ... i subscribed to some prepaid providers but their systems do not seem to be configured right as well
12:34.20leifmadsenoutgoing overlap?
12:34.30WIMPyAt least Telefonica supports it so that would be really great.
12:34.31leifmadsenwhat is the difference between incoming overlap?
12:34.44gustoWIMPy: what?
12:35.00bobb_WUsure thing leif
12:35.09WIMPyleifmadsen: Incoming works, outgoing is not implemented.
12:35.19leifmadsenah, ok got it
12:35.20bobb_WUi updated my kernel yesterday and had to update the link or something
12:35.25leifmadsentook me a minute to think
12:35.44bobb_WUthe command was "eselect kernel list"  then i had to choose the right number with "eselect kernel set 3"
12:35.56bobb_WUbut that -3- was the correct number for my system
12:36.14din3shi have a problem whereby double legged attended transfers are not bridged, caller continues to hear MOH, while callee can hear caller talking
12:36.19din3shplzz helppppp :/
12:36.21bobb_WUat that point, re-emerge dahdi and it made the drivers in the correct spot
12:36.26gustobtw. when someone calls my number ... how do i tell asterisk in the dialplan to send it to my ata-adapter/phone?
12:36.27din3shbangs his head on his desk
12:37.11gustodin3sh: i am banging my head on my desk for three months already - since i got in contact with VoIP /asterisk/
12:37.26ectospasmdin3sh: what version of Asterisk, what technologies (SIP/DAHDI/etc.) are you using to bridge the attended transfer?
12:37.32gustobut i make progress
12:37.42din3sh1.4.42
12:37.46gustoeveryday i come a bit forward .. now i heard something
12:37.54gustodin3sh: is that your version of asterisk?
12:37.59WIMPygusto: Same for everyone. Maybe som day it will become usable :-)
12:38.07din3shhappens on both SIP-SIP-SIP, DAHDI-SIP-SIP
12:38.28leifmadsendin3sh: pretty sure that was just an issue with 1.4 that wasn't fixed
12:38.29ectospasmAsterisk 1.4 will be EOL April 21st.
12:38.32leifmadsencould be wrong
12:38.36gustoyes
12:38.42gustoi am using asterisk18
12:38.45din3sharrgh
12:38.51gustoand everyone should use asterisk18 by now
12:38.53din3sh1.8 or 18?
12:38.54din3sh:p
12:38.56gusto1.8
12:38.57leifmadsen1.8 :)
12:39.10gustoasterisk18 is the package name to openwrt/opensuse too/
12:39.20ectospasmsame on AsteriskNOW
12:39.59din3shok ok
12:40.13din3shi got it, i gotta move to asterisk18
12:40.24jacc0or asterisk 10
12:40.36din3shasterisk20
12:40.41ectospasmremember, 1.8 is Long Term Support (LTS) release, and will be fully supported longer than 10.
12:40.54din3shuhuh
12:40.57gustoyes
12:41.00bobb_WUmy odbc functions aren't registered in asterisk :/  how do i force them to try and register so i can see the output in the CLI?
12:41.03gustoand asterisk18 is easy to find
12:41.04ectospasmhttps://wiki.asterisk.org/wiki/display/AST/Asterisk+Versions
12:41.12leifmadsenbobb_WU: module load func_odbc.so
12:41.22gustoi honestly do not know where to get asterisk 10.0 .... exept by compiling it
12:41.26leifmadsenbobb_WU: or module reload func_odbc.so if you've made changes
12:41.30bobb_WUjust says it can't load the module
12:41.52leifmadsengusto: http://packages.asterisk.org/
12:41.52*** join/#asterisk asteriskser_ (c584b45c@gateway/web/freenode/ip.197.132.180.92)
12:42.00ectospasmdoes the module exist, bobb_WU?
12:42.04leifmadsenbobb_WU: do you have res_odbc.so loaded?
12:42.13leifmadsendid you compile odbc related modules?
12:42.16leifmadsenguesses not
12:42.27gustohahahahahaha
12:42.28leifmadsenls /usr/lib/asterisk/modules/*odbc*.so
12:42.29gustocentos :-D
12:42.38leifmadsengusto: not sure why that is funny
12:42.40bobb_WUwell yeah it was a working system before i took it down for upgrades
12:42.59bobb_WUodbc is in my make file and i just recompiled the psqlodbc package
12:43.02leifmadsenpabelanger: change management! :)
12:43.02gustoleifmadsen: because there is only the 5 release
12:43.10leifmadsenlooks at Qwell for that
12:43.11gustowho does still use the centos5 release
12:43.12din3shupgrades on a working system?
12:43.14gustothat is old
12:43.18leifmadsengusto: lots of people including myself
12:43.21din3shdon't fix whats not broken
12:43.22gusto:-P
12:43.23din3sh:D
12:43.26leifmadsen5.8 was released like 2 weeks ago
12:43.28gustoi have centos6 on my server
12:43.35leifmadsengood for you, we're all very proud of you
12:43.37bobb_WUi was on 2.6 kernel and 1.6 asterisk
12:43.57bobb_WUi'm working on one system so i can image and upgrade all of our nodes (10 or so)
12:43.58gustoand honestly, i do not like it too much, i would be far more happy with a freebsd jail or something ... but i did not try it yet
12:44.11asteriskser_what are problems relating to asterisk scalability  i read alot about, but i really don't see anyproblem can some one please shed some light on that issue ?
12:44.22ectospasmbobb_WU: upgrading shouldn't be without headache then, depending on what version of 1.6 you're coming from, there could be two or three major revisions in between...
12:44.28leifmadsenasteriskser_: please ask a less vague question
12:44.34asteriskser_ok
12:45.17bobb_WUi'll try to re-compile asterisk since its not finding modules- maybe the kernel eselect trick will fix it
12:45.28gustobtw. do you know the difference between german and slovak post?
12:45.48asteriskser_presence for example we can do that in asterisk ,  why do we need scf then ?
12:45.58gustothe german one delivers too late and the slovak one too soon
12:46.17gustothe consumer is pissed anyway
12:46.32leifmadsenasteriskser_: because you don't understand what Asterisk SCF does -- Asterisk SCF has the capability to do live call failover for instance
12:46.35WIMPyToo soon? How does that work?
12:46.54din3shdelivers before you even post
12:46.59fpriorHi, Is there any way to tell Asterisk not to generate additional headers X-Asterisk-HangupCause and X-Asterisk-HangupCauseCode ?
12:47.24gustoWIMPy: like i said, i sent myself a package and i did not manage to sleep over and it was there
12:47.48gustoWIMPy: and according to DHL the package was still on route while i already had it
12:47.50WIMPyAnd what's bad about that?
12:47.56asteriskser_leifmadsen: what is i understand about scf is extensibility i.e adding more modules easily , availability which we can do with asterisk redundancy
12:48.00gustoWIMPy: because i did not expect it
12:48.04WIMPyThat's normal.
12:48.17asteriskser_leifmadsen: but my real question is
12:48.35WIMPy's got the impression DHL only syncs the data once a day.
12:48.36leifmadsenasteriskser_: in many cases, Asterisk SCF may not be required, but Asterisk SCF is more of a framework and platform for a large number of calls. Asterisk is a PBX that you can distribute.
12:48.38gustoWIMPy: and it was just luck that they put it down behind my fence and there was good wather so i took it over while wanting to get something to eat
12:48.55leifmadsenyou might even use them together
12:49.01leifmadsenand in many cases probably would
12:49.28asteriskser_leifmadsen: yes , but the issues of handling large number of calls can be done with kamilio for instance right ?
12:49.59leifmadsenasteriskser_: sure, but its a SIP proxy
12:50.10leifmadsenit doesn't handle live call failover
12:50.46leifmadsen"Asterisk SCF is a framework that allows developers to create real-time communications applications that include voice, video and text and that meet the demands of a full range of uses, from embedded applications to enterprise and carrier solutions. Asterisk SCF is architected to provide the highest levels of availability, scalability, extensibility, fault-tolerance and performance."
12:50.48gustois it a problem when registry gets another IP address than peer does? i mean one provider SRV record resolves to many ip addresses and so i have two different ip addresses for one provider record for peer and for registry
12:51.24bobb_WUleifmadsen: the modules weren't there so selecting the newest kernel and recompiling fixed my odbc issues.  now to fix the database issues and maybe i can make a call
12:51.34gustoWIMPy: you know what the biggest problem is with telefonica/reselers and their VoIP?
12:51.38WIMPygusto: You may not match an incoming call.
12:52.04WIMPyAs I said: I only know the Alice thing.
12:52.10gustoWIMPy: its that you can not contact telefonica directly and the reseller does not know what you re talking about (because they are incompetent)
12:52.30gustoWIMPy: what do you mean by incoming call matching?
12:52.32asteriskser_leifmadsen: ok please correct me if i am wrong , if i am only intersted in voice but with large scale and i will only use sip i can use asterisk and it will scale well right ?
12:52.42WIMPyI think that will be the same everywhere.
12:52.46leifmadsenasteriskser_: maybe
12:52.56leifmadsenit depends how you implement it and what you mean by scale
12:53.02WIMPyAlthough the Alice support has been quite good so far.
12:53.08asteriskser_i mean over 10000 calls
12:53.18gustonooo ... alice ... i doubt it
12:53.18asteriskser_distrbuted stats
12:53.22leifmadsenI'm working on a system that has 50 physical boxes and handles over 250 different PBXs
12:53.27gustoWIMPy: what do you mean by incoming call matching?
12:53.42leifmadsenasteriskser_: it's infinitely scalable depending on how you architect such a system
12:53.42WIMPygusto: If the call comes from another IP that you got for the peer, it won't match. It then depends on you allowing guest calls.
12:53.47*** join/#asterisk Carlos_PHX1_ (~Carlos@ip68-2-227-192.ph.ph.cox.net)
12:54.07leifmadsenasteriskser_: one physical box will not handle 10,000 simultaneous calls (probably)
12:54.34asteriskser_leifmadsen: the only reason i am asking this questions is i find in many slides of asticon the issue of scalabilty raised
12:54.35WIMPySo unless they authenticate, wich I guess they don't, you either need to create one peer per IP or accept guest calls.
12:54.38leifmadsenasteriskser_: http://asteriskdocs.org/en/3rd_Edition/asterisk-book-html-chunk/Clustering.html
12:54.42gustoWIMPy: and do you think that that could cause that voice message? wouldnt that end up in an asterisk debug error?
12:55.04WIMPyThat's incoming only.
12:55.06leifmadsenasteriskser_: sure, and those people probably didn't architect their systems correctly or didn't have the ability to understand how
12:55.06asteriskser_leifmadsen: that is assuming no transcoding
12:55.20leifmadsenyou haven't been clean what you mean by scalable
12:55.26leifmadsens/clean/clear/
12:55.35gustoWIMPy: where do i adjust guest calls/
12:55.45gusto?
12:55.55gustois going to the toilet first
12:56.10leifmadsenif you have a box that handles 250 calls and have 40 boxes you're at 10,000 calls
12:56.30WIMPygusto: allowguest
12:56.52*** part/#asterisk vipkilla (~chatzilla@unaffiliated/t-dot-zilla/x-2830497)
12:58.08leifmadsenasteriskser_: the problem with your question is there are many many variables associated with your question, so it's not possible to answer with a yes or no. It depends entirely on what you're doing, and how you're architecting the system. Transcoding is just one aspect. How many calls per second? how fast are you setting up calls? how long are calls lasting? is there recording? are you using ramdisks? are you evenly dist
12:58.08leifmadsenributing calls amongst the systems? how many systems do you have? -- I could go on
12:58.33leifmadsenIs Asterisk scalable? Of course it is. You just have to know how to architect the system.
12:59.36asteriskser_leifmadsen: thank you that is the answer that i was looking for , because i didn't see anything in the way of scaling asterisk however those slides that are floating around on the web made me worried
13:00.34leifmadsenasteriskser_: I have no idea what slides you're talking about -- you haven't watched my presentations on Asterisk clustering then I guess
13:00.50asteriskser_leifmadsen: can i have link please
13:01.03asteriskser_leifmadsen:*the
13:01.08leifmadsenasteriskser_: also when you search on Google, be very careful about what the dates are that come back. In many cases stuff from 2006 comes back before new information because it has been clicked on more times.
13:01.08*** join/#asterisk ios_sos (~nbeard@24-181-146-94.static.dlth.mn.charter.com)
13:01.57asteriskser_leifmadsen: thanks for the heads up
13:02.10leifmadsenasteriskser_: http://asteriskdocs.org/en/3rd_Edition/asterisk-book-html-chunk/Clustering.html -=- http://www.astricon.net/videos/Asterisk-Powered-Distributed-Call-Centers.html
13:02.22leifmadsenhttp://www.astricon.net/videos/Clustering-and-Scaling-Asterisk-with-Kamailio.html
13:03.11asteriskser_leifmadsen: thanks
13:05.44bobb_WUhow do i check my database connections through the CLI?  i'm having connection issues even though i'm pretty sure i have the right parameters defined.
13:07.10bobb_WUthe user account has permission on the view (psql asterisk -U username)
13:08.16leifmadsenodbc show
13:08.28*** join/#asterisk serafie (~erin@nat/digium/x-uclatgfkobfollzo)
13:08.49bobb_WUhmm it says its connected
13:09.31bobb_WUgoing for a quick smoke while postgres reboots
13:15.10*** join/#asterisk Flumdahl (n30@shell.auth.se)
13:15.17Flumdahlhow do i get reports to work so i can see the incoming call logs there? latest freepbx
13:16.02gustowas putting the toilet under heavy load
13:16.11gustoWIMPy: allowguest in sip.conf?
13:16.26bobb_WU"odbc show" has my local connect working, but when the query executes from the dialplan, the CLI says it can't connec
13:16.30bobb_WU*connect
13:17.29[TK]D-Fendergusto, Yes
13:18.32*** join/#asterisk mjordan (~mjordan@nat/digium/x-aqtnszpedzustkqk)
13:18.32*** mode/#asterisk [+o mjordan] by ChanServ
13:18.40gustoSIP/2.0 487 Request Terminated
13:18.52gustodoes this look familiar to someone?
13:19.03gusto[TK]D-Fender: i am going to try that out
13:19.08[TK]D-Fendergusto, Single line messages like that with no sense of context don't tell us anything.
13:19.32gusto;               - allowguest (default enabled)
13:19.53gusto[TK]D-Fender: of course, but there is not more yet
13:19.58*** join/#asterisk gonewage (~gonewage@72.2.130.205)
13:20.00[TK]D-Fendergusto, One side gave up for whatever reason and just said "I'm done".  We don't see what it is in response to.
13:20.10gustothe debug doesnt give much context
13:20.12[TK]D-Fendergusto, There is more... you're jsut not showing us
13:20.21[TK]D-Fender~pb
13:20.21infobot[~pb] A "pastebin" is a web-based service where you should paste anything over 3 lines so you don't flood the channel. Here are links to a few: http://www.pastebin.com , http://pastebin.us , http://pastebin.ca , http://channels.debian.net/paste , http://paste.lisp.org , http://bin.cakephp.org/ , http://asterisk.pastey.net/ ; or install pastebinit with yum or aptitude.
13:20.22[TK]D-Fender^^^^^^^
13:20.45gustoi ll paste it when it happens again, i ll try that guest first
13:21.07ectospasmnot to mention a pcap will go a long way in debugging SIP as well.
13:21.14gustoah .. i have it enabled ... because it is not disabled anywhere
13:21.29[TK]D-Fenderno need for pcap.  * SIP debug is what counts
13:21.47[TK]D-FenderAnd is self contained and tells you more
13:22.19Flumdahli have cdr reports module installed
13:23.21gustoso
13:23.28[TK]D-FenderFlumdahl, #freepbx , #asterisknow <-
13:23.30[TK]D-Fender~freepbx
13:23.30infobot[~freepbx] FreePBX is unable to be supported here. It is made up of complex dialplans and scripts which can't be easily supported by people who aren't deeply involved. Try joining #freepbx and asking there
13:23.38gustothe guest one wasnt it and i just tried out to let down the firewall
13:23.51gustoi put it up again, because that did not help either
13:24.02[TK]D-Fendergusto, You are guessing and not showing.
13:24.14*** join/#asterisk wesphillips (~wphill04@137-237-233-124.harris.com)
13:24.16gusto[TK]D-Fender: w8, i ll get that paste
13:25.24*** part/#asterisk bobb_WU (~bobb_WU@206.74.211.14)
13:25.35*** join/#asterisk bobb_WU (~bobb_WU@206.74.211.14)
13:25.35*** part/#asterisk bobb_WU (~bobb_WU@206.74.211.14)
13:25.54*** join/#asterisk bobb_WU (~bobb_WU@206.74.211.14)
13:26.47*** part/#asterisk Flumdahl (n30@shell.auth.se)
13:33.15gustoah
13:33.22gustoas i see the authentification worked
13:33.32gustoshould i include that in the pastebin as well?
13:34.03gustooh
13:34.04*** join/#asterisk Chainsaw (~chainsaw@gentoo/developer/chainsaw)
13:34.18gustothere is nothing to paste any more ... the 487 is not there any more
13:34.46*** join/#asterisk aidinb (~aidin@unaffiliated/aidinb)
13:34.52gustoseems like my account is deactivated from the providers side ... nothing to do about it ... i already reported it
13:35.17[TK]D-Fendermaybe whatever firewall you threw up in front is blocking things entirely.  Hard to say as we have no details about what you're doing, where the call is really coming from, what else you have connecting to your server, etc.
13:35.21gustobut according to the log it looks very good
13:35.52gusto[TK]D-Fender: well, i get that voice error, so the connection to my provider stands
13:36.12*** join/#asterisk asteriskser__ (c58456b0@gateway/web/freenode/ip.197.132.86.176)
13:36.13gusto[TK]D-Fender: also in the log ... i never seen such a lot of success messages from asterisk in my life
13:36.15[TK]D-Fenderwell if it not a file your server is playing back to you.... then it's them.
13:36.31gustohahahahahaha
13:36.40[TK]D-FenderAnd I don't see a clear distinction on where you hear it.  Incoming? Outgoing?
13:36.49*** join/#asterisk saliak (~kailas@ip68-9-228-184.ri.ri.cox.net)
13:36.52gusto[TK]D-Fender: i already told everyone that my asterisk runs on opewrt ... there are no voice messages installed
13:37.09gusto[TK]D-Fender: and the voice error message is in german - where would asterisk get it from ? :-D
13:37.27*** join/#asterisk darkmantis (~darkmanti@gemini.cybershade.org)
13:37.27[TK]D-Fendergusto, yes, and I don't see a proper full description of the call.
13:37.48gusto[TK]D-Fender: when i call a number ... it says in german- from my provider's side- also the log says that everything is OK, that i can not call that number from my account
13:37.50[TK]D-Fenderis that outside calling in?  Does it actually attempt to arrive at *?  Is this a mesage on your calling out?
13:38.51gusto[TK]D-Fender: i am calling a number, but it does not ring, instead provider's installed voice says to me in german, that i am not allowed to call that number
13:39.12[TK]D-Fendergusto, Again, is that you calling OUT your sever to their service?
13:39.13darkmantisHi Guys
13:39.16gusto[TK]D-Fender: we are talking about asterisk, so me calling outside ... not trying to call myself
13:40.12gusto[TK]D-Fender: i am calling my grandmother's PSTN over their voip service
13:40.22gusto[TK]D-Fender: or my own mobile phone number
13:40.33gusto[TK]D-Fender: throws the same messages on both
13:40.50gustoi would say ... i mastered it now
13:41.56gustojust calling myself and forwarding it to my ata is not done yet
13:42.00[TK]D-Fender<gusto> [TK]D-Fender: i am calling my grandmother's PSTN over their voip service <- this is what I was waiting to hear
13:42.03gustothat will be the next thing to do
13:42.39[TK]D-Fendergusto, So you call them, they give you audio and nd say there is some other problem.  SIP isn't the problem.  So either your number is, or their service doesn't want to reach them
13:43.21gusto[TK]D-Fender: yes, they are idiots, thats no news ... maybe the be-converged server is not configured properly
13:43.48[TK]D-Fendergusto, Have you double-checked the number you are passing them VS what format they say you should use?
13:43.56gusto[TK]D-Fender: or every number is blocked for my account so that i can not call anyone
13:44.12gusto[TK]D-Fender: yes, i tried several formats
13:44.31[TK]D-Fendergusto, Starting to sound like yuor provider is refusing.  Ask them.
13:44.39gusto[TK]D-Fender: and the number is right because i was calling from my old telephone that was connected to PSTN before
13:44.49gusto[TK]D-Fender: yes, i already reported it
13:46.07*** join/#asterisk putnopvut (~putnopvut@asterisk/master-of-queues/mmichelson)
13:46.07*** mode/#asterisk [+o putnopvut] by ChanServ
13:46.16DarkMantisCan anyone tell me what the best authentication security is for IAX/Asterisk or is that not relevant for here?
13:46.20gustoi am going to move to another providers i subscribed to ... so that i can use my working asterisk now
13:46.42ChainsawDarkMantis: As always the most secure way to run a service is to firewall it off from the big bad internet.
13:46.55ChainsawDarkMantis: And whitelist the IPs you want to talk to.
13:46.56*** join/#asterisk akrohn (~akrohn@38.101.60.42)
13:46.59gustoDarkMantis: the best security is not to use VoIP at all, or use a provider who does give you prepaid option
13:47.09gusto:-D
13:47.20DarkMantisI have got firewalls in place (hardware and software) however, I wold have thought there would be an authentication method (TLS or w/e) that could be used?
13:47.45ChainsawDarkMantis: The downside of encryption is that it adds latency.
13:48.02gustoi was like smashed about that digest auth he does really everytime / so on in and out / like MD5 sums of some credentials ... hm ... impressively naive :-D
13:48.07ChainsawDarkMantis: And humans are particularly sensitive to delays in audio (particularly if delayed echos result).
13:48.35gustoyes, the solution would be to let it do only authentification through TLS or something
13:48.38DarkMantisChainsaw: Okay, so is there no recommended security type?
13:48.41gustoand not encrypting the whole thing
13:48.57gustoi would recommend TLS
13:49.10bobb_WUChainsaw: are you the maintainer of the Gentoo asterisk packages?
13:49.12DarkMantisOh yeah, sorry the only bit we intend to encrypt is the authentication. Nto so much the calls themselves
13:49.18Chainsawbobb_WU: That is correct.
13:49.25gustobut no idea how to configure it, but i ve seen in the sip.conf that asterisk18 seems to support that
13:49.28bobb_WUthanks for all your help!
13:50.04gustotss ... ppl still using gentoo :-D
13:50.15DarkMantisgusto: I am new to all the SIP/Asterisk/IAX so forgive my ignorance. I think the server I am workign on currently runs an older version of Asterisk
13:50.16gustothaught that all moved to archlinux
13:50.43gustoDarkMantis: i am new to asterisk as well, so we are in the same boat
13:50.45Chainsawgusto: I've only used it since 2003 or so.
13:50.51Chainsawgusto: (Gentoo, not Asterisk)
13:51.10gustoChainsaw: i did use gentoo a long time ago as well but moved away from it
13:51.16Chainsawbobb_WU: I hope the dozen or so extra patches make it easier to use :)
13:51.22DarkMantisI use arch where possible too gusto :P
13:51.24gustoChainsaw: it was cool when it came around
13:51.34Chainsaw(Queue Digium developers telling me off for carrying downstream patches)
13:51.37*** join/#asterisk generalhan (~generalha@about/windows/staff/generalhan)
13:51.40gustoDarkMantis: i do not use arch, but i think arch is the better choice
13:51.50DarkMantisAh fair enough ^_^
13:52.00gustoDarkMantis: i know someone who uses it
13:52.19gustoDarkMantis: i am more into FreeBSD, you know?
13:53.00bobb_WUchainsaw: it works with init.d scripts and makes the software maintenance so much easier, just wanted to thank you for all your hard work
13:53.02DarkMantisI knwo of it, but I can't say I have honestly ever used it
13:53.07gustoand NetBSD and OpenBSD from time to time ... also Dragonfly, but i did not manage to get it work as a native installation, maybe only in virtualbox
13:53.33Chainsawbobb_WU: You are most welcome. I'm glad it is enjoyed :)
13:53.38gustoinit.d ... well
13:53.46bobb_WUlol i don't know about enjoyed
13:53.53bobb_WUits being a huge headache right now
13:54.12gustoin respect to asterisk it could use also systemd, as long as you find a -nodaemon option
13:54.12ChainsawTelephone systems are like copiers. People only talk about them when they fail.
13:54.26ChainsawWhich makes supporting them a bit of a thankless task.
13:54.28[TK]D-FenderDarkMantis, "older version" need to get a specific # associated to it, and that will be the limiting factor
13:55.19DarkMantisIt is running 1.4
13:55.26gustowell, i enjoyed that opinion of some guy back then in the centuries of inventors like Edison ... i have no idea who it was but he was mentioned by Obama in his speach lately
13:55.38gustowho said - telephone is a great invention, but who would want to use one?
13:56.19gustome too, as soon as i get this VoIP s*** to work, i am not going to use it
13:57.00gustomaybe i build my own infrastructure with ATA adapters so that i can call asterisk to asterisk my friends and family and so on, but i will have to buy some more ata adapters for that
13:58.45gustoVoIP may be cool when you want to be reachable from PSTN telephones, and than it is not important what plan you have, maybe a prepaid account is enough with a local number in, i found a provider who can give me one, so that someone can call me ;-) or better not
13:59.02DarkMantisSorry, what's PSTN?
13:59.10gustoDarkMantis: analogue telephone
13:59.13DarkMantisAh right
13:59.14DarkMantisXD
13:59.29gustoDarkMantis: they call it here like that, it was new to me till yesterday too
13:59.47gustowho would imagine that i would call an analogue phone like PSTN .. no one
13:59.56gustohowever ... not calling at all saves a lot of money
14:01.17gustowell, and when nothing else works, one can still find that guy who wrote the RFC's for VoIP and beat him up :-D
14:01.26bobb_WUhow do i fix an "SQL Exceute error -1: HY000 Error: Permission denied for relation new "?
14:01.40bobb_WUi logged in to postgres with that user account and was able to query the view
14:01.40gustoyes
14:01.51gustothat seems like an permission arror inside the sql database
14:02.03bobb_WUi copied and pasted the password into the unixodbc parameter files
14:02.12gustoi would check if the user you are trying to use has permissions to do his job
14:02.13bobb_WUextended permissions to localhost in the pg_hba.conf file
14:04.44gustoso ... i am done for today
14:12.43*** join/#asterisk kessius (~cassio@201.21.173.58)
14:14.09bobb_WUany advice on how to troubleshoot that error?
14:14.28*** join/#asterisk ChkDigit (~u388mw@74.3.144.66)
14:18.56*** join/#asterisk qakhan (~qakhan@203.130.22.202)
14:18.59qakhanall what is the right sequence of installaing asterisk, unimrcp, pocketsphinx and asterisk connector bridge ???
14:38.28aberriosanyone compiled wanpipe 3.5.25 with dahdi 2.6.0 okay? having issues here.
14:45.13*** join/#asterisk thecardsmith (~doug@pdpc/supporter/student/thecardsmith)
14:46.04aberriosnvm
14:50.04TSMim getting audio distortion on a connection that one of our users has at their house, using either G722 or u/alaw I hear a razzing on the upper frequencies of the users voice
14:52.00*** part/#asterisk asterisk-Tester (~RAMYT@193.227.170.247)
14:53.30*** join/#asterisk gonewage (~gonewage@mail.sni-law.com)
14:54.01*** join/#asterisk RogersJA (~RogersJA@S0106001346cbd191.gv.shawcable.net)
14:54.02*** join/#asterisk wonderworld (~ww@dsdf-4db5edca.pool.mediaWays.net)
14:54.33*** join/#asterisk _Corey_ (~chatzilla@64.121.4.75)
14:54.46ChainsawTSM: Have you considered the possibility of it being microphone/client-specific?
14:55.20*** join/#asterisk theHub (~theHub@69.177.93.21)
14:55.35TSMcould be, the phone was taken from the office yesterday when it was working fine
14:59.43*** join/#asterisk scubes13 (~scubes13@rrcs-70-60-211-241.midsouth.biz.rr.com)
15:01.03ChainsawTSM: Could be something as mundane as the ultrasonic noise from a nearby CRT television being introduced into the signal. If the filter is not perfect, which it never is...
15:01.22TSMgrrr true, ile tell the person to move the phone
15:15.12*** join/#asterisk oej (~olle@h87-96-134-129.dynamic.se.alltele.net)
15:18.51jayteeI just installed fail2ban yesterday on centos 5.7 running asterisk 1.6.2 and it doesn't seem to be adding anything to the asterisk jail. I've checked the configs against a working version on another pbx and I don't see anything different other than the ignoreip ranges. I've restarted the fail2ban daemon and iptables but no luck. Not sure what to check next. Anyone have a suggestion?
15:22.34p3nguinI'd like to see filter.d/asterisk.conf and jail.conf.
15:23.20jayteeok, please hang on a sec while I pastebin them
15:24.53jayteehttp://pastebin.com/n7gApK9Q     < that's jail.conf
15:26.02jayteehttp://pastebin.com/TbgpymxK       < /etc/fail2ban/filter.d/asterisk.conf
15:27.26ChannelZI don't think any of those Registration lines will match (what version of Asterisk?)
15:27.43ChannelZI use      NOTICE.* chan_sip\.c.* Registration from .* failed for '<HOST>:[0-9]+' - (Wrong password|No matching)
15:27.54ChannelZand   NOTICE.* chan_sip\.c.* Call from '.*' \(<HOST>:[0-9]+\) to extension '.*' rejected .* extension not found
15:28.28jayteeit's running Asterisk 1.6.2.18.2
15:28.32p3nguinWhat scenario are you testing where it is failing to ban?
15:29.06p3nguinRegistrations, unauthed calls, etc?
15:29.30jayteeI've used a softphone from outside with a bad password and also with a non existent sip account
15:29.49p3nguinYes, but what scenario?
15:29.54*** join/#asterisk vinhdizzo (~vinh@dhcp-v022-171.mobile.uci.edu)
15:32.13p3nguinTelling me that you are using a specific type of device doesn't tell me what you are doing with it.
15:32.16jayteeI've tested registration using an incorrect password and I've also tested trying to register with an invalid account. Those two scenarios should match the wrong password regex and the No matching peer found.
15:32.41p3nguinOkay, registrations should certainly be tested and banned if needed.
15:32.57jayteewhich is how I've tested it in the past
15:34.26p3nguingrep Registration /var/log/asterisk/messages
15:34.31p3nguinDo you see anything?
15:38.58*** join/#asterisk orioni (~chatzilla@46.183.121.133)
15:43.57jayteeok, now I'm getting bans and I found the main part of my problem.
15:44.47jayteeI had one outside ip address I was testing with was already in the ignoreip range. my bad (slaps self with a trout)
15:45.28jayteeand when I test from another it's banning when I try to register a valid account that doesn't match the ACL list.
15:46.36jayteeso if I remove the ban and remove the deny/permit on the test account and use a wrong password it will probably match and ban from that too.
15:47.58TSMwhy does this not evaluate to 1, '$[${EPOCH} <= ${RGSTART}]'
15:48.29TSMor the other way '$[${RGSTART}  <= ${EPOCH}]
15:48.34[TK]D-FenderTSM, perhaps you should output those 2 variables first and look at them first.
15:50.17*** join/#asterisk thecardsmith (~doug@pdpc/supporter/student/thecardsmith)
15:56.54*** join/#asterisk Hive (~Hive@173-165-205-1-jacksonville.hfc.comcastbusiness.net)
16:00.57*** join/#asterisk coppice (~chatzilla@123203240234.ctinets.com)
16:04.50*** join/#asterisk g_r_eek (~g_r_eek@173-9-142-122-Miami.FL.hfc.comcastbusiness.net)
16:08.21jayteep3nguin, after commenting out the deny/permit, removing the successful ban on the IP that matched the ACL regex I've retested and it's still not banning on bad password attempts
16:08.44*** join/#asterisk hobodave (~hobodave@pdpc/supporter/professional/hobodave)
16:10.32*** join/#asterisk VinceAntw (~VinceAntw@91.176.80.180)
16:12.02p3nguingrep "Registration.*failed" /var/log/asterisk/messages
16:17.27p3nguinIs there any way to limit the time an application or function can operate?  I'm using the CURL() function to fetch a URL, but I need to limit the time it can run so that if the URL does not return after, say, 2 seconds, it will give up and move on rather than waiting for a definitive response from the web server.
16:19.53p3nguinIf it is successful, it should return in under 1 second; if there is a problem, it can take up to 30 seconds to report the failure.  I can't wait the 30 seconds for a failure.  That's far too long for the call to sit and wait for something to happen at that step of dial plan.
16:20.21*** join/#asterisk Kobaz (~kobaz@its.kobaz.net)
16:21.03*** join/#asterisk din3sh (din3sh@41.136.247.121)
16:23.44jayteep3nguin, got it all working now. Had to fix a mangled regex for the Wrong password expression. Thanks for helping!
16:24.02jayteeI'm definitely getting old :-(
16:30.36*** join/#asterisk Defraz (~Defraz@69.20.176.132)
16:32.04*** join/#asterisk thecardsmith (~doug@pdpc/supporter/student/thecardsmith)
16:36.52*** join/#asterisk TimeRider (~steve@92.41.65.4.threembb.co.uk)
16:37.35*** join/#asterisk VinceAntw (~VinceAntw@91.176.80.180)
16:39.45VinceAntwHi everybody, can anyone assist me with a DAHDI question?
16:40.03VinceAntwis there any way to see if a DAHDI channel has congestion?
16:40.30WIMPyWhat does that mean?
16:43.39VinceAntwif I make a call with a phone connected to a dahdi analog card and the other party hangs up it should play the hangup sound (in my country it is 425,500 0,500) but instead it plays much shorter beeps (which I think is congestion)
16:44.07*** join/#asterisk gusto (~gusto@nrbg-4dbe1fdb.pool.mediaWays.net)
16:44.12gustoso so
16:44.17gustoready to test :-)
16:51.16jayteeone of my clients wants to be able to allow collect calls. Is this possible with VOIP using an ITSP like Flowroute?
16:53.52p3nguinNot to my knowledge.  The next best thing is a call-back system.
16:54.03p3nguinOr just use a toll-free number.
16:56.12p3nguinToll-free would be a lot cheaper than a collect call anyway.
17:02.04*** join/#asterisk vinhdizzo (~vinh@dhcp-v022-171.mobile.uci.edu)
17:16.25*** join/#asterisk twodogs (~twodogs@telok.vitiate.me)
17:30.45*** join/#asterisk sp00kz (~ilubj00@unaffiliated/sp00kz)
17:32.42p3nguinOkay, I think I figured out how to limit the length of time for an app or function.  No thanks to anyone.
17:32.48*** join/#asterisk vinhdizzo (~vinh@dhcp-v022-171.mobile.uci.edu)
17:33.55*** join/#asterisk CyBeRxIxO (~CyBeRxIxO@190.41.182.228)
17:33.58jayteep3nguin, thanks. I'd started thinking about the toll-free number after I asked. Makes sense and should be cheaper. My client is a law firm and they get collect calls from the local jail but toll free should work for them.
17:34.19CyBeRxIxOHi, any asterisknow support here?
17:34.23p3nguinI had a feeling it was jail related.
17:35.01p3nguinMany jails do collect calls OR calling cards (which use toll-free access numbers), so a toll-free number should work just fine.
17:35.05CyBeRxIxOexcuse me, i got a case anyone up to help me with advices?
17:36.46CyBeRxIxOdoes iax2 works fine between elastix and asterisknow?
17:37.47CyBeRxIxOif it is does g729 digium paid codec works on them?
17:38.31p3nguinBoth use Asterisk as back ends, so yes IAX2 works between them.
17:38.51p3nguinAnd yes g.729 codec works over IAX2.
17:39.34*** join/#asterisk timahvo1 (~rogue@41.80.213.231)
17:40.58*** join/#asterisk fobus912 (~fobus912@41.143.23.173)
17:41.01fobus912Hi All
17:41.26fobus912does anyone know about an Open Source STUN Server that support authentication ?
17:43.31*** join/#asterisk joecool (~joecool@no-sources/joecool)
17:57.09*** join/#asterisk lanning (~lanning@173-8-187-197-SFBA.hfc.comcastbusiness.net)
17:59.43CyBeRxIxOp3nguin thanks for ur answer
18:02.42CyBeRxIxOhaving 20 sip station, 2 pstn voip trunk lines and 1 iax2..... does it make sense on puttin g729 licence on the "pstn voip trunk"?
18:07.02p3nguinIf you need to save bandwidth at the sacrifice of voice quality, sure.
18:07.38*** join/#asterisk vfabi (~fabi@178.76.76.61)
18:07.57*** join/#asterisk TheCompWiz (~TheCompWi@wsip-68-109-200-102.mc.at.cox.net)
18:08.39TheCompWizanyone know how to get asterisk to not-care if (when using tls + sip) the common-name on the client certificate doesn't match the client's IP (or whatever else)
18:11.42HiveWould someone please enlighten me as to when a SIP channel is established and when it is destroyed?  My server shows what feels like too many active SIP channels :|
18:12.16TheCompWizafaik... you should see 1 channel per dialog.
18:12.23*** join/#asterisk singler (~singler@beta.kirneh.eu)
18:13.20HiveSo when a call is bridged such as the answer() command is issued to an incoming call
18:13.35Hivea sip channel is established, but when is it destroyed?
18:13.40TheCompWizbridged between two sip peers? or dahdi -> sip? or ???
18:14.25*** join/#asterisk VultureZ (~Chuck@173-165-205-1-jacksonville.hfc.comcastbusiness.net)
18:14.45TheCompWizbasically a "channel" is made everytime the pbx needs to talk to the device over sip.  Generally, while a call is active there is at least 1 open dialog for each involved peer.
18:15.10VultureZTheCompWiz, is a channel established for registration purposes?
18:15.10TheCompWizwhen the pbx starts talking to the phone... a channel is opened first... when it's done talking... the channel is closed.
18:15.18TheCompWizit can momentairily
18:15.23VultureZokay
18:15.30VultureZI bet that is what Hive is questioning
18:17.01TheCompWizfor "registrations" you'll see something like xx.xxx.xxx.xxx   (None)           random-characters  0x0 (nothing)    No       Rx: REGISTER               <guest>
18:17.43HiveIs there a command that I need to issue in the hangup context of calls to close out the channels?  My server shows '926 active SIP dialogs' which seems like too many
18:18.13*** join/#asterisk Tim_Toady (~fuzzy@130.43.51.201.dsl.dyn.forthnet.gr)
18:20.04TheCompWizhow many endpoints?
18:22.33Hive45
18:22.46TheCompWizthat is too many.
18:22.49TheCompWizsip trunk?
18:22.55pigpenanybody got a Digium D70 phone out there?  I got a question.
18:23.17TheCompWizdigium makes phones?
18:23.23pigpenyeah.
18:23.31Hiveby end point you mean sip peers?
18:23.32TheCompWiznever seen one... interesting.
18:23.33pigpenShould be released to the general public mid April.
18:23.34_Corey_pigpen: I have one here
18:23.49TheCompWizHive: attached devices that aren't trunks.
18:24.14pigpen_Corey_, using the side buttons, are they ready to show in use/idle yet?
18:24.24_Corey_pigpen: Sure, that works
18:24.40_Corey_The extended status stuff works nicely too... "Extended away" etc
18:25.15HiveTheCompWiz, Oh are you saying that the '926 active SIP dialogs' is too many? Or that 45 peers is too many?  It's odd, my 'core show channels' shows an accurate number of open channels, but 'sip show channels' has that huge number
18:25.40TheCompWiz926 active sip dialogs for 45 endpoints.
18:25.40TheCompWizat most.... you should have 1-2 per endpoint.
18:25.55pigpen_Corey_, how do you add it?  I am guessing you are not using the "contacts" app to add.
18:26.02HiveYeah thats how I feel, was hoping to get some light shed on why that's happening
18:26.52pigpen_Corey_, I have added a few (SIP exten and a hint exten) with no luck.
18:27.02pigpenI took the quick route and just setup quickly with the web app.
18:27.11pigpenbut will do the provisioning when I have more time.
18:27.19_Corey_pigpen: I'm using it with the latest AsteriskNow ISO and the FreePBX digium module...  is that what you're using?
18:27.42TheCompWizHive: got some sort of proxy or nat in the middle?
18:28.10pigpen_Corey_, no.  I am using Asterisk 10.1.2 and a 1.6.1.12 box
18:28.24pigpenso my guess is you are provisioning it.
18:28.42pigpenprobably with the DPMS app
18:28.52_Corey_pigpen: Yeah, I'm using the DPM
18:28.57HiveNo, direct connection, and sip.conf has bindaddr=0.0.0.0
18:29.07_Corey_pigpen: I can probably look at the config it's producing to see what you should have though
18:29.15pigpenyeah.  I used a DPMS the other day, but it was an AR15 platform.  ;-)
18:29.16TheCompWizHive: what kind of endpoints?
18:29.47HivePolycom 50x series
18:30.45TheCompWizHive: I've got at least 50 501s on my network... and I'm not having that many sip channels... (I also have 550s and 33X phones)
18:30.58TheCompWizno clue what to tell ya.
18:31.09_Corey_pigpen: Are you just looking for the contacts xml file format?
18:31.09TheCompWizHive: what firmware versino?
18:31.15TheCompWiz*version?
18:31.42pigpen_Corey_, yeah, if I can add the "buddy watch" polycom equivilent.
18:32.02*** join/#asterisk SaRSAeOL (~sarsaeol@66-113-78-49.rev.ibsinc.com)
18:33.20_Corey_pigpen: It looks like it's documented here: http://docs.digium.com/phones/phones-module-for-asterisk-users-guide-beta.pdf
18:33.31_Corey_Have you checked that out yet?
18:33.55pigpenHive, I ran across something some time back.  Having a PRI, if I didn't account for every DID, and if one was called that was not counted for, it would loop up a crap load of channels.  Mind you, I have about 500 DID numbers.
18:34.39pigpen_Corey_, no, not yet, but thanks.  I opened the box, 5 min of playing, 10 min of looking at DPMS, then got in here.  I need to get some usage on this to make sure it is a product to move forward with.
18:34.59pigpenthanks bty...i am rushing it a bit.  Got too much stuff to do today.
18:35.04HiveTheCompWiz, we are running the most recent firmware for those phones
18:35.14p3nguinI still keep getting a stuck channel periodically and nothing I can do short of restarting asterisk gets rid of it.  Any ideas how to get rid of it?  channel request hangup does not touch it, I've redirected it to extensions which run Hangup(), etc.  I just want to destroy stuck channels easily without restarting.
18:35.22Hivepigpen, i think you might be onto something...
18:35.38pigpenyeah, it is not fun when that happens.
18:35.45pigpenjust keeps looping the channels.
18:35.55Hivelol... any way to clear out some of these channels? a restart?
18:36.11TheCompWizHive: a restart would do it....
18:36.15pigpenyou can hang them up.  but stop/start works better.
18:36.26pigpenin the 1.6 and prior, sometimes the channel would get locked.
18:36.59TheCompWizlong-term... it behaves like a memory leak... (each active channel consumes resources) ....
18:37.13HiveHmm, ok definitely going to look into this
18:37.29HiveThanks for your help guys :)
18:38.13_Corey_pigpen: Aha...  I've been using the D70 off and on since Christmas and probably full-time since February.  Very few complaints so far.
18:38.58TheCompWizHive: I've got a box with ~120 users.... been running for months now without a reload and it's only got 4 active channels right now.
18:39.10*** join/#asterisk gonewage (~gonewage@72.2.130.205)
18:39.14HiveThats what my core show channels looks like
18:39.27HiveI saw this 900 something from sip show channels and figured something was awry
18:39.29TheCompWizI'm talking about 'sip show channels'
18:40.31TheCompWiz... wish someone knew how to help me...  /sigh
18:40.57pigpen_Corey_, yeah, I got to get my headset working.  I have a GE Netcom 9350...
18:41.33TheCompWizdoes the digium phone support EHS?
18:41.38pigpenyeah
18:41.43TheCompWizshiney...
18:41.48TheCompWizmgiht have to get one to play with.
18:41.54pigpengood luck.
18:41.56QwellTheCompWiz: You should get 400 to play with.
18:41.58TheCompWizlol
18:42.15TheCompWizQwell: pfft.... if I don't like 'em... who is gonna send me money back?
18:42.23_Corey_I've been told the EHL support isn't quite available yet ;)
18:42.24QwellTheCompWiz: _Corey_ will
18:42.29TheCompWizWOOOOHOOO!
18:43.13TheCompWizQwell: you know you wanna help me with TLS fun....
18:43.14_Corey_minus a nominal (~100%) restocking fee, sure
18:43.21TheCompWiz:P
18:43.52CyBeRxIxOguys price per g729 codec?
18:44.04TheCompWizsame as girls price per g729 codec.
18:44.11CyBeRxIxO:o free?
18:44.24*** join/#asterisk AlfE_ (~quassel@83-215-36-12.bruck.dyn.salzburg-online.at)
18:44.27p3nguinWas that your quoted price?
18:44.29TheCompWiznope.
18:44.52CyBeRxIxOi need to get 3 g729 licence
18:45.02CyBeRxIxOwhat i have to do?
18:45.04p3nguinYou probably just need to get one license.
18:45.22CyBeRxIxOi have 2 psnt/voip trunk and 1 iax2 trunk
18:45.23CyBeRxIxOneed 3?
18:45.27TheCompWizCyBeRxIxO: the process consists of... contacting digium... asking them for a quote... and then throwing money at them.
18:45.30p3nguinJust one license.
18:45.34TheCompWiz(especially as they OWN g729.)
18:45.41*** join/#asterisk oej (~olle@h87-96-134-129.dynamic.se.alltele.net)
18:45.49Qwellno, no, no, no, no, we most definitely do not "own" it.
18:45.50_Corey_lol, they don't own g729
18:45.54p3nguinIt's really not even that difficult.
18:46.06CyBeRxIxOjust one licence? what happeb if there are calls on the same time
18:46.12p3nguinJust go to the web site and buy one license for as many channels as you need.
18:46.18_Corey_some guy sitting on a bunch of patents in a cushy evil-looking chair somewhere "owns" g.729
18:46.57CyBeRxIxOwhat you mean p3nguin
18:47.05p3nguinI mean exactly what I said.
18:47.14CyBeRxIxOi need the licence and support to install it
18:47.28p3nguinGo to digium.com.  Buy a license for as many channels as you intend to support.
18:47.50CyBeRxIxOyou mean 1 licence for 3 channels?
18:47.50p3nguinI'll do it for you, but you'll pay my regular hourly rate.
18:47.52TheCompWizI thought digium owned the patents/copyrights for g729... /shrug
18:48.15p3nguinIf you need three channels, go buy a license for three channels.
18:48.18*** join/#asterisk Russ (~russ@209-147-130-219.nat.asu.edu)
18:48.24_Corey_TheCompWiz: If I remember correctly, these guys actually hold the patent: http://www.sipro.com/
18:48.45Qwell_Corey_: lots of companies own patents
18:48.50CyBeRxIxOi currently have elastix last version
18:48.54Qwellthere's just one that collectively sells licenses to use them
18:48.54CyBeRxIxOdo i need asterisknow?
18:52.58_Corey_Qwell: Yeah, I don't know who Digium pays for what but I've heard g.729 licensing isn't too crazy
18:53.32_Corey_Now, "visual voicemail" on the other hand...  ;)
18:55.45CyBeRxIxO"The Digium G.729 codec and Digium product registration tools are supported on Linux x86 and x86_64 environments only."
18:55.55CyBeRxIxOmeans not on i386?
18:56.03p3nguini386 IS x86
18:56.14TheCompWiz_Corey_: I just use the google voice setup.   Free... it's visual... and they even give the option to email/text a transcription of the voicemail.
18:56.38CyBeRxIxOp3nguin im about to buy the licence
18:56.48CyBeRxIxObut i'd need some help
18:57.02p3nguinx86 encompasses, but is not necessarily limited to, 386, 486, 586, and 686.
18:57.09gustothats cool
18:57.48gustoso i tried another voip provider and i get the same error ... but now i know that it is sipcode 603 what means the same as with that be-converged
18:57.57p3nguinWhat help is it that you need to buy the license?
18:58.12CyBeRxIxOu told me i need 1 licence of 3 channels
18:58.19p3nguinyes.......
18:58.19CyBeRxIxOmy system is:
18:58.21_Corey_TheCompWiz: The patent troll who claims to have a "ownership" of "visual voicemail" is currently trying to shake down dozens of companies (mostly with iPhone apps)
18:58.35CyBeRxIxO20 sip client in lan, 2 trunk pstn/voip and 1 iax2
18:58.43CyBeRxIxOu sure i need 3 channels?
18:58.47GuggeCyBeRxIxO: you need a license for the concurrent number of channels that needs to decode/encode g729
18:58.50p3nguinLicense as many channels as you want to use.
18:58.56TheCompWiz_Corey_: lol... too funny.   I hate patent trolls.
18:59.18p3nguinIf you want to transcode 5 channels using g.729 at the same time, buy 5 channels.
18:59.27_Corey_TheCompWiz: yeah, don't get me started...  One of my customers actually pulled the feature from their iPhone app
18:59.37p3nguinIf you want to transcode only 3, buy 3.
19:00.34CyBeRxIxOif my configuration says "disallow=all allow=g729" but all are channels are being used? what happens
19:00.43CyBeRxIxOon the next call
19:00.57p3nguinIt depends on if you will need to transcode or not.
19:01.15p3nguinYou can use g729 end to end, without transcoding, without the license.
19:01.36p3nguinIf you transcode, you'll use a channel out of your licensed decoders/encoders.
19:01.44[TK]D-FenderCyBeRxIxO, Your 4th call will drop like a rock
19:01.50CyBeRxIxOXD
19:02.03CyBeRxIxOcant tell that the the rich boss
19:02.21[TK]D-FenderCyBeRxIxO, If he's rich, have him pay for the number of channels you need to support
19:02.23p3nguinIf he is so rich, buy enough channels so it isn't a problem.
19:02.32[TK]D-FenderAcutally.. if you want your solution to work... same thing
19:02.44CyBeRxIxOok ok got it
19:02.46CyBeRxIxObut...
19:03.03CyBeRxIxOwhat happen if i lost the comp
19:03.10CyBeRxIxOand install a new one
19:03.16CyBeRxIxOmy licence lost?
19:03.29[TK]D-FenderCyBeRxIxO, there is a limited transfer capability
19:03.30p3nguinIf you call between two phones and do not have to transcode, you will not use up one of your encoders/decoders.
19:04.26CyBeRxIxOwhen asterisk mess up and need to reinstall it
19:04.35CyBeRxIxOhow to put the licence again?
19:04.56CyBeRxIxOi mean, is that posible? or i need to buy a new one
19:06.48*** part/#asterisk gonewage (~gonewage@72.2.130.205)
19:09.10CyBeRxIxOwhen i recive call on psnt/voip trunk g729 apply automatic? or depend of configuration of spa3102?
19:09.50p3nguinEverything is dependent on configuration.
19:10.04p3nguin~magic
19:10.05infobotForms based RAD language. URL: http://www.magic-sw.com
19:10.22CyBeRxIxOspa3102 show "g729a" is that the codec im buying?
19:10.32*** join/#asterisk FiReSTaRT (~dlyh@unaffiliated/firestart)
19:10.56p3nguinAs I've said several times already, you only need a license to transcode.
19:12.53*** join/#asterisk drudge` (~drudge@unaffiliated/drudge/x-837452)
19:12.55*** part/#asterisk drudge` (~drudge@unaffiliated/drudge/x-837452)
19:19.23*** join/#asterisk paolosupino (~paolo-sup@net-2-38-113-188.cust.dsl.vodafone.it)
19:20.13paolosupinocan anyone point me to a URL that as a clear how to on setting up a confbridge in asterisk 1.8?
19:20.35p3nguincore show application ConfBridge
19:24.28*** join/#asterisk Russ (~russ@209-147-130-219.nat.asu.edu)
19:24.45CyBeRxIxOi asume then once i put the g729 paid licence to configure all devices on "disallow=all allow=g729"
19:25.11CyBeRxIxOam i right?
19:25.34p3nguinNo.
19:25.48p3nguinYou only set that on peers that you want to always use g729.
19:28.05*** part/#asterisk VinceAntw (~VinceAntw@91.176.80.180)
19:30.21CyBeRxIxOi want all to use always g729
19:30.42p3nguinWhy?  Why would anyone want to do that for phones on a LAN attached to Asterisk?
19:31.41p3nguinYou said yourself that you have 20 phones on a LAN attached to Asterisk.
19:32.11p3nguinYou should use the cheapest (in terms of processing) codec possible for those.
19:32.41p3nguincheapest and best quality
19:32.54p3nguinThat will probably be ulaw or alaw.
19:34.08p3nguinOr, if you're inclined to try it, testlaw.
19:34.11_Corey_g722 sounds pretty nice ;)
19:34.37*** join/#asterisk WindBack (~quassel@190.220.135.165)
19:35.31p3nguinBut it is more expensive, and he probably doesn't have phones that even support it.
19:36.07gustohow do i assign a register to a diaplan?
19:36.13p3nguinYou don't.
19:36.19gustobecause when i call my number it always goes to default
19:36.22_Corey_p3nguin: g722 is free if you have a device that supports it
19:36.26p3nguinRegister statements go in sip.conf.
19:36.33gusto[Apr  4 19:35:31] NOTICE[3558]: chan_sip.c:22081 handle_request_invite: Call from '' (62.52.148.87:5060) to extension '4991131042466' rejected because extension not found in context 'default'.
19:36.36p3nguin"cheapest (in terms of processing)"
19:36.47_Corey_ah, gotcha
19:36.53CyBeRxIxOthanks p3nguin
19:36.58CyBeRxIxOgot it
19:37.01WindBackHello.. I don't find any documentation which explains me the functionality of "sip show mwi" cli command. Can anybody explain me it
19:37.14_Corey_p3nguin: I haven't been paying attention :)
19:37.18p3nguinIt's okay.
19:37.35p3nguinI understand how IRC works.
19:38.27rrittgarnSay the asterisk process just dies... where are the logs for that crash? /var/log/asterisk/messages ?
19:39.05p3nguinIf it dies, it can't write logs.
19:39.27p3nguinIf it logged anything prior to dying, I'd expect to see it in the full log.
19:40.18CyBeRxIxOso to use the g729 codec all i need is: "on pstn/voip trunks disallow=all allow=g729" and on spa3102 "preferred codec=g729a (wich is the only g729 named" and everything will work fine, am i right?
19:40.53p3nguinDo you want to always use g729 between your asterisk and the ITSP?
19:41.03[TK]D-FenderCyBeRxIxO, You don't need to set a preference on the SPA.  If *'s peer sys G729, then that is the end of it
19:41.16CyBeRxIxOyes im currently having cuts on calls
19:41.47CyBeRxIxOqualify is bad
19:41.55CyBeRxIxOvery bad
19:42.04[TK]D-FenderAnd that may have nothing to do with codec
19:42.17p3nguinprobably doesn't
19:42.18[TK]D-FenderJitter = cuts
19:42.42CyBeRxIxOduring the call there are moments that cant hear nothing
19:43.14p3nguinIf you haven't checked your available and used bandwidth, why are you so sure changing to g729 is going to help?
19:43.28rrittgarnp3nguin, if i have more than 3 callers in conf bridge it ends the asterisk process... nifty bug.. Asterisk SVN-branch-10-r360139
19:43.29p3nguing729 is used to reduce the used bandwidth of calls over a link.
19:43.59CyBeRxIxOi have 2mb internet for more than 20 users
19:44.07CyBeRxIxOi think that is my calls problem
19:44.41CyBeRxIxOsometimes call are normal, sometimes dont
19:45.09CyBeRxIxOiax2 is better than pstn but still qualify is real bad
19:45.31p3nguinYou can use trunking with iax2 to reduce the bandwidth of 20 calls.
19:46.25p3nguinHow many concurrent calls to the PSTN are you having at peak?
19:46.27CyBeRxIxOwhat you mean on "use trunking"
19:46.33CyBeRxIxO2 or 3
19:46.37p3nguinIAX2 supports trunking.
19:46.51p3nguintrunk=yes
19:46.58p3nguinSIP does not do trunking.
19:47.04*** join/#asterisk wudles (~wudles@gateway.secureinstrument.com)
19:47.27CyBeRxIxOiax2 is trunking between 2 elastix on diferent places
19:47.33CyBeRxIxOthat is done
19:47.39p3nguinDid you specify trunk=yes?
19:47.43p3nguinon both peers?
19:49.17CyBeRxIxOjust checked, yes that is the config
19:49.29CyBeRxIxOtrunk=yes on both peers
19:49.47p3nguinOkay, if trunk=yes on both sides, trunking is enabled and that will help save bandwidth of multiple calls.
19:49.53CyBeRxIxOtype=friend
19:49.54CyBeRxIxOtrunk=yes
19:49.54CyBeRxIxOqualify=1000
19:49.54CyBeRxIxOdisallow=all
19:49.54CyBeRxIxOallow=ulaw
19:50.03p3nguinBut for only two or three calls, your savings will not be that great.
19:50.10CyBeRxIxOis that enough on a good iax2 trunk?
19:50.39p3nguinThat's all there is for trunking.  Set trunk=yes on both sides and trunking is enabled.
19:51.18CyBeRxIxOwhy still qualify of calls on iax2 is still bad
19:51.36CyBeRxIxOhow can i make it better? g729 licence?
19:52.19gustowhat i do not understand is that when i put in peer config context=<context> it still does not look for context, but it looks still to 'default'
19:52.45gustoso i absolutely do not understand that error message
19:52.55p3nguinTwo ulaw calls should only use about about 160 kb/s without trunking.
19:53.04gusto<PROTECTED>
19:53.15[TK]D-FenderCyBeRxIxO, If you have jitter issues, FIX YOUR LINK
19:53.36p3nguinEither your call is not matching the peer you configured, or you aren't correctly setting the context value.
19:53.47[TK]D-Fendergusto, Because it clearly isn't matching your peer.  Something you'd see if you paid attention to the SIP DEBUG of the call attempt
19:53.56*** join/#asterisk wudles (~wudles@gateway.secureinstrument.com)
19:54.42gusto[TK]D-Fender: so what do i do about it?
19:54.56[TK]D-Fendergusto, Look at the actual call and fix your peer
19:55.23gusto[TK]D-Fender: what peer? the one where the call comes from?
19:55.31[TK]D-Fenderyes
19:55.59gusto[TK]D-Fender: where do i fix it? in reigistry?
19:56.05gustoregister =>
19:56.07[TK]D-Fendersip.conf <-
19:56.16gustoof course, but where exactly
19:56.20[TK]D-FenderYOUR PEER
19:56.35gustoso inside the peer config
20:03.49gustoLooking for 655161 in default (domain 77.190.31.219:5060)
20:04.44gustoit ssems like my asterisk server is rejecting the call because he does not find 655161
20:04.47gustowell
20:05.14gustoshould i say that [myprovider] is in context=655161 ?
20:05.20*** join/#asterisk malcolmd (~malcolmd@pdpc/sponsor/digium/malcolmd)
20:05.20*** mode/#asterisk [+o malcolmd] by ChanServ
20:06.56[TK]D-Fendergusto, No, it is looking in [default] and not in the context you specified in your peer because it is not identified as COMING from your peer.
20:08.20gusto[TK]D-Fender: so i go to [default] in extensions.conf and put there what? like exten => 655161,1,Dial(myphone) ?
20:08.44[TK]D-Fendergusto, No, you go fix your peer and make sure that you have a match in the context it points to.
20:09.50gusto[TK]D-Fender: so register => .../EXTENSION must be the same as [PEER] context=EXTENSION ?
20:10.19*** join/#asterisk asteriskmonkey (~darlek@74-51-38-204.telnetcommunications.com)
20:10.35asteriskmonkeyas meetme been dropped in 1.10?
20:11.50[TK]D-Fenderasteriskmonkey, No
20:11.58[TK]D-Fendergusto, No, that is not your PEER
20:12.22[TK]D-Fendergusto, and no, context != extension.
20:13.04*** part/#asterisk kl4m (~kl4m@gw2.noc1.sys-tech.net)
20:13.21asteriskmonkeyI buillt asterisk 10.3.1 on freebsd and it seems to be missing meetme
20:13.31[TK]D-Fendergusto, A register statement is also not a peer.  That is nowhere I told you to look for these past half a dozen times I've been telling you the same thing.
20:13.34gustook, so he is looking for 655161 in default ... how do i make him look else? or is it OK, that he looks in default?
20:13.47[TK]D-Fenderasteriskmonkey, installed from where?
20:13.56[TK]D-Fendergusto, Fix your peer
20:14.13asteriskmonkeyports
20:14.19gusto[TK]D-Fender: but i do not know what should be wrong with my peer, my peer works
20:14.22asteriskmonkey/usr/ports/net/asterisk10
20:14.29[TK]D-Fendergusto, No, it clearly doesn't
20:14.46[TK]D-Fendergusto, otherwise it'd be looking where the context in there points to
20:15.11[TK]D-Fenderasteriskmonkey, And do you see it in the source in tehre?
20:15.20gusto[TK]D-Fender: i have some code for you, w8
20:15.27[TK]D-Fenderasteriskmonkey, Because that is "ports", that isn't "Asterisk official packaging"
20:15.46gusto[TK]D-Fender: http://www.personal-voip.de/index.php?page=wiki&wikiid=support:konfigurationen:asterisk
20:16.22asteriskmonkeyhave to check all the build files ill check there thanks for th yes/no about it being still there
20:16.56[TK]D-Fendergusto, Means nothing to me.  You aren't looking at your call, I do't see your actual configs and you seem to be exhibiting a very severe learning disability.  the term "fix your peer" simply does not seem able to sink in.
20:18.01asteriskmonkeyis confbridge better than meetme?
20:18.23[TK]D-Fenderasteriskmonkey, Yeah, it hasn't gone anywhere yet.  ConfBridge hasn't quite caught up in functionality to the point of dropping MeetMe yet.  Perhaps very soon as I've heard there has been a lot of progress
20:19.47gusto[TK]D-Fender: http://pastebin.com/riRLv8WH
20:21.23gusto[TK]D-Fender: i can not see what is wrong with my peer here
20:22.26[TK]D-Fendergusto, I don't see you looking at the call with SIP debug enabled.
20:23.12[TK]D-Fendergusto, And I can see that you did not even DEFINE what context calls from your peer should go to.
20:23.33p3nguinIf the call doesn't come from 46.182.250.50, it will not match the peer.
20:24.14p3nguinIt could be matching, but without setting the context, it will go to the context set in general.
20:24.26gusto[TK]D-Fender: http://pastebin.com/TC21Q5hW
20:25.03gustop3nguin: you may be right
20:25.10p3nguinOf course.
20:25.12gustop3nguin: that seems to be the problem
20:25.26p3nguinFound peer 'personalvoip' for '015223817325' from 46.182.250.50:5060
20:25.29p3nguinThe peer was matched.
20:25.38gustoah
20:25.38[TK]D-FenderHe never specified a context
20:25.39p3nguinYou should have set the context.
20:26.00gustobut that does not happen with be-converged, but that is another issue, OK
20:26.11[TK]D-Fendergusto, And we have no idea how you configered tthat other one
20:26.13gustobecause sometimes the requests come from ip addresses i never seen before
20:26.19p3nguinThe same applies to all peers.  You set a context PER PEER or it uses the default context set in general.
20:26.24[TK]D-Fendergusto, And does not matter as this one clearly does not have the context specified
20:26.42[TK]D-FenderLooking for 655161 in default (domain 77.190.31.219:5060) <--- so it fell back to [default] which is somethin you should never allow like that.
20:26.48gusto[TK]D-Fender: yes, yes, we are talking about this first and that second we can talk about when this works, or maybe then the other will work again, when i find the problem
20:27.06[TK]D-FenderWe found the problem.
20:27.14gustoso so
20:27.44gustobut you say that context specification does not solve the problem
20:27.52[TK]D-FenderSo fix your peer.  Set the context that you failed to set (which the link you gave us SHOWED THEM DOING
20:28.33gustoi already tried that with context set before, and it did not help, i ll do it again and i ll paste the debug
20:29.40gustowell, this time we got it
20:29.44p3nguinI've never seen it take someone three months to configure a couple peers and a few extensions.
20:29.47gustohmm ... ok
20:29.53gusto:-D
20:29.57gustome neither
20:30.05[TK]D-FenderCouple?  This is one.  Not "couple" or "few"
20:30.11gustobut i am still making progress
20:30.22p3nguinHe's been working on two peers.
20:30.30p3nguintelnr and personalvoip
20:30.39[TK]D-Fender\o/
20:30.46[TK]D-FenderOk, checkout time here, BBIAB
20:30.49p3nguinTHREE MONTHS
20:31.08p3nguinI would have fired you after the third DAY.
20:31.11gustobut i was not trying three months in line
20:31.22gustoyes, i am trying the third day :-D
20:31.27gustobut over three months
20:31.28gusto:-D
20:33.36pabelanger~itsp
20:33.36infobot[~itsp] An ITSP is an Internet Telephony Service Provider (or VoIP telephone company). They allow you to either SEND calls to the PSTN (this is called termination), RECEIVE calls from the PSTN (called origination), or both. Some offer fixed rates, others $/min. Enter ~itsplist-us (USA) or ~itsplist-ca (Canada) for a listing of popular ITSPs.
20:33.43pabelanger~itsp-us
20:34.41pabelanger~itsplist-us
20:34.41infobotHere are some popular ITSPs (USA) starting with the more respected ones: http://www.teliax.com , http://www.voicepulse.com/connect/ , http://www.broadvoice.com , http://www.jnctn.com , http://www.bandwidth.com , http://vitelity.net , http://voip.ms and http://flowroute.com
20:35.29pabelangerany feedback about flowroute? good / bad?
20:35.43p3nguingood
20:37.55gustop3nguin: please take a look at this one http://pastebin.com/08GBNWLY
20:38.03*** join/#asterisk danlench (~daniell@pool-71-113-225-119.herntx.dsl-w.verizon.net)
20:38.09gustop3nguin: that is more important than that other shit
20:38.23gustoand context is specified, but falls into default
20:38.30p3nguinNo matching peer for '015223817325' from '62.52.148.39:5060'
20:38.33gustothats what i was talking about
20:38.37gustoyes
20:38.37p3nguinHas nothing to do with context.
20:38.41gustoso
20:38.45gustohere we are
20:38.45p3nguinNo matching peer = default context.
20:38.49gustook
20:39.09gustois not that big of an idiot
20:39.30gustop3nguin: so what can be done about that?
20:39.35p3nguinWhat is the host you set for that peer?
20:39.39p3nguinhost= what?
20:39.53gustosipproxy.endesha.be-converged.com
20:40.25p3nguinThere's no DNS for that host.
20:40.27gustopcscf-brln-de01.endesha.be-converged.com. 21 IN A 62.52.148.39
20:40.30gustoit is
20:40.34gustoSRV record
20:40.49gustodig _sip._udp.sipproxy.endesha.be-converged.com srv
20:40.49p3nguinokay
20:41.10p3nguinOkay, they have four hosts.
20:41.19gustoand that is what i am talking about the whole day, that i have this 4 ip addresses and i can not know which one hits me
20:41.28p3nguinPastebin your peer.
20:41.31p3nguinI'll show you how.
20:41.35gusto???
20:41.39gustowhat peer now?
20:41.47p3nguinPastebin the peer for be-converged.
20:41.55gustoyou mean the sip.conf [be-converged]?
20:41.58p3nguinexactly
20:42.04gustono, problem, w8
20:42.36p3nguinagain with the "weight"
20:43.07gustop3nguin: http://pastebin.com/eGr58EGx
20:44.21gustomaybe i will have to adjust the other VoIP provider as well, because that time it was "just luck" that he matched the peer
20:45.17gustoi could swear that he did not do it before ... because personalvoip has also more ip addresses but resloves only to one, but they have some more, they have a list of raw ipv4 addr's on website
20:46.05asteriskmonkey[TK]D-Fender : http://pastebin.com/DE4KByKz
20:46.19asteriskmonkeyshould do i just enable that and take our the replace line?
20:46.26gustohe is not here any more
20:46.32p3nguinhttp://pastebin.com/GGvRsQx1
20:47.06danlenchMorning, I have an existing pbx vodavi punchblock analog install with 21 internal lines and 4 external. New to all this and have been trying to research it for weeks. We want to maybe go voip internal and keep our 4 PSTN lines. either way we want to go asterik.
20:47.30gustop3nguin: aaah, i ve seen something like that already somewhere in documentation/forum, but for another use
20:47.46p3nguinThat will allow all of the hosts to match the peer.
20:47.54gustoof course, i did not get that idea to use it for it
20:48.02gustop3nguin: yes, i understand
20:48.15p3nguinGive it a try.
20:48.37danlenchmy question is, how to get the PSTN into the computer and then can i use a normal NIC to push it out over the network
20:49.00gustoso i do not have to make a "peer" config for every one i use just [peer](take over properties)
20:49.01asteriskmonkeydanlench you need an anaolg card
20:49.06SaRSAeOLdanlench: digium makes pci cards that have fox ports
20:49.11SaRSAeOLfxo*
20:49.14asteriskmonkeyor just use sip from a provider
20:49.45p3nguindanlench: You can use an FXO card in the computer, or you can use a SIP gateway device like an SPA-8000.
20:50.21p3nguinErr... is the 8000 FXS only?
20:50.33gustop3nguin: wow, i have now a lot of peers :-D
20:51.04p3nguinIf the SPA-8000 is FXS only, then "like" was the keyword in my sentence.
20:51.20gustowell, it works ... now it matches the peer
20:51.36gustoand throws A LOT OF MESSAGES
20:51.43gustofor every peer conf
20:51.57danlenchp3nguin: its starting to sink in, slowly. really new to pbx though, ugg
20:52.04gustook, what do we do now?
20:52.21gustoextensions.conf
20:52.26danlenchand our current system is dying
20:52.31p3nguindanlench: There are devices which have 4 or 8 FXO ports.  Apparently the SPA-8000 isn't one like I thought it was.
20:52.48gustoFXO ports are ports for analogue telephones?
20:52.52SaRSAeOLyes
20:52.55SaRSAeOLoutside lines
20:52.58p3nguingusto: Once you match peers, then you create extensions in the context set in the peers.
20:53.05SaRSAeOLthere are fxo and fxs
20:53.13gustop3nguin: yes, that will be the "easier" part now
20:53.14gusto:-D
20:53.30danlenchok right. FXO connected to the PSTN and then the NIC to the internal switch right (basically)
20:53.37p3nguinyes
20:53.52danlenchp3nguin: thanks, this helps alot.
20:54.03danlenchtoo many acronyms
20:54.04p3nguinIf you have a gateway device, it will have the analog ports and speak SIP over Ethernet.
20:54.21p3nguinOtherwise, the card in the Asterisk box will take care of all the work.
20:54.48danlenchSession Initiation Protocol?
20:54.52p3nguin~sip
20:54.52infobotsip is, like, Session Initiation Protocol, http://www.cs.columbia.edu/sip/ (see RFC 3261) It's HIP to be SIP!
20:55.04danlenchk
20:55.11*** join/#asterisk [TK]D-Fender (~chatzilla@64.235.218.194)
20:55.28p3nguinWe use SIP in Asterisk more than other VoIP protocols.
20:55.39*** join/#asterisk Defraz (~Defraz@69.20.176.132)
20:55.58danlenchthen the gateway box will go into the switch and the asterix box will talk to it
20:56.06p3nguinBut Asterisk is capable of other channel technologies if they are required.
20:56.12p3nguinYes, exactly.
20:56.47p3nguinYou'd configure a peer (or several peers) in asterisk for the gateway to talk with asterisk.
20:57.01danlenchso its just like an internet gateway but for telephony
20:57.06p3nguinYes.
20:57.23danlenchand get new cool phones ;)
20:58.04p3nguinThen any calls from IP phones would go through asterisk, and if the calls are supposed to go to the PSTN, Asterisk will send the call via the analog gateway device.
20:58.22p3nguinIf configured to do so, of course.
20:58.58gustop3nguin: so i say exten => 655161,1,Goto(SIP/myphone)?
20:58.59danlenchok, all internal calls go through asterik and external  (PSTN) to gateway
20:59.16p3nguinCheck pricing on a card with four FXO modules and then compare it to prices of gateways with FXO ports.
20:59.29danlenchok, thx p3nguin
20:59.39danlenchsee y'all soon
20:59.47p3nguingusto: Dial(), not Goto().
20:59.53*** part/#asterisk danlench (~daniell@pool-71-113-225-119.herntx.dsl-w.verizon.net)
21:00.12p3nguingusto: If you have a peer in sip.conf named "myphone", then extension 655161 would Dial() the peer (the phone).
21:00.27gustoyes yes
21:00.30gustoi ll try it first
21:02.03gusto[Apr  4 21:01:34] WARNING[3740]: app_dial.c:2198 dial_exec_full: Unable to create channel of type 'SIP' (cause 20 - Unknown)
21:02.12gustofor all providers
21:02.15rrittgarnwhats the best way to see what is causing a crash/quit? I've got a confbridge set up, and whenever I get more than three calls it looks like it gracefully quits... mid call... only when the third user hits #
21:02.35p3nguinWhat do you mean by "for all providers" ?
21:03.18*** join/#asterisk dijib (~root@bas10-kitchener06-1176138838.dsl.bell.ca)
21:03.37dijibanybody know how to disable MWI?
21:04.09gustop3nguin: i tried both
21:04.18leifmadsendijib: don't have a mailbox= setting for your peer
21:04.24p3nguingusto: Show me.
21:04.31gustop3nguin: i get the same error message, i am now looking at the debug output
21:04.35p3nguinShow me how you are doing it.
21:04.43p3nguinShow me the extension.
21:04.58p3nguinShow me something instead of just saying it doesn't work.
21:05.23fpriorHi all, here again with the case of the spa400 and * 1.8 . There are news on http://pastebin.com/fVC9JtV2 , [TK]D-Fender
21:05.30gustop3nguin: http://pastebin.com/LV3GrVYz
21:05.57p3nguinI don't see the verbose output in there.
21:06.18p3nguinWhen you show me something like that, you should have core set verbose 3 in addition to sip set debug on.
21:07.25paolosupinocan I put the language parameter in sip.conf in specific labels or do I have to put it in the [general] section?
21:07.26p3nguinBy that, all I know is that the call is trying to find extension 655161 in context home.
21:07.54p3nguinYou didn't show me what extension 655161 is doing.
21:08.21gustop3nguin: http://pastebin.com/UWNiQF6B
21:08.33*** join/#asterisk evil_gordita (~evilgordi@ip70-188-50-186.rn.hr.cox.net)
21:08.51p3nguinSIP/linksysata is offline.
21:09.09p3nguinsip show peers
21:09.11gustoit is not
21:09.15p3nguinYou'll see it isn't there.
21:09.16gustobut maybe it is not registred
21:09.21p3nguinExactly.
21:09.22gustoi am restarting it, w8
21:09.27p3nguinNot register = not online.
21:09.35p3nguin(as far as asterisk is concerned)
21:09.42gustoyes yes
21:09.44gusto<PROTECTED>
21:10.04p3nguinIf you don't see an IP address for it in sip show peers, it isn't online.
21:10.14gustowell
21:10.17gustonow it got well
21:10.21p3nguinEven if you do see an IP address, there is still a chance that it has gone away.
21:10.52gustoyes yes, it sometimes does not re-register
21:11.23gustoit is because i am often trying new configs now and when i am reloading sip, then it takes some time till that linksysata adapter realizes that
21:11.30gustoand maybe he even doesnt
21:11.32gustohowever
21:11.38gustoi ll try the other one
21:12.26gustowhat i do not understand is why he is going with that same extension on both
21:12.49gustoi mean it works vor personalvoip and endesha-be-converged with only one extension
21:13.00gusto655161
21:13.04p3nguinSet the register timeout to a lower value, like 60.
21:13.06p3nguininstead of 3600.
21:13.07gustointeresting, isnt it?
21:13.18gustowell, that is not that big of a problem
21:13.55p3nguinYou can call extension 655161 via both providers?
21:14.09p3nguinAnd extension 655161 always Dial()s SIP/linksysata ?
21:14.16gustoyes
21:14.29gustoand outside calling still does not work
21:14.44gustoso what we managed to get to work is only when someone calls me
21:14.49p3nguinI would think you'll get the same result with both providers if the end point is the same.  If it is offline, it's gone and cannot be reached.
21:15.04p3nguinFix your extensions for outbound dialing.
21:15.22gustoeasier to say than done
21:15.26p3nguinCreate a context for outbound extensions.
21:15.28gustonot today any more
21:15.32p3nguinNo, it's really as easy as it sounds.
21:15.33gustoi have ones
21:15.35gustoi am not dumb
21:15.40p3nguinisn't sure
21:15.46gustoand actually it works, but i get 603 from the other side
21:16.02gustobut now i am happy that we got at least this 50% running
21:16.06p3nguin603?
21:16.09p3nguinWhat's a 603?
21:16.15gustono idea
21:16.25p3nguinThere's more to a message than just a number.
21:16.31p3nguinWhat are the words associated with it?
21:17.39gustono idea
21:17.45gustoi had to look it up as well
21:17.52gustobut that error is not thrown to me
21:17.56gustoit is on the other side
21:18.01gustoand i do not see the whole message
21:18.10rrittgarnkernel: [483891.365841] asterisk[11155]: segfault at 0 ip b76d75b0 sp ad352698 error 4 in libc-2.11.3.so[b7664000+140000]
21:18.46rrittgarnany tips?
21:19.04p3nguin603 Decline
21:19.15p3nguinThey won't accept the call.  Show me your extension for dialing out.
21:19.21p3nguinI have a feeling you're doing it wrong.
21:19.33p3nguinI think you're sending the call TO them as opposed to THROUGH them.
21:19.56p3nguinShow me the extension using one of those providers.
21:20.22p3nguinjust the line with the Dial() should be enough.
21:20.56*** join/#asterisk krotos (~d3v1l@87.13.68.165)
21:20.59krotoshi all guy
21:21.04p3nguin2295 calls processed
21:21.06p3nguinNot bad.
21:22.02sp00kzover how long?
21:27.08gustoso
21:27.29gusto[Apr  4 21:23:00] NOTICE[3558]: chan_sip.c:22081 handle_request_invite: Call from '' (193.106.16.101:5060) to extension '655161' rejected because extension not found in context 'default'.
21:27.47gustolike i said, there was an unreported IP, i put it in there later
21:27.57gustobut someone can call me, that one works
21:28.32p3nguinI forgot to look at the uptime before I restarted asterisk.  It would have been several days.
21:28.51gusto04/04/12 23:19:15 < p3nguin> They won't accept the call.  Show me your extension for dialing out.
21:28.54gustow8
21:28.58p3nguinweight again
21:29.08gustop3nguin: exten => _49.,1,Dial(SIP/personalvoip,,)
21:29.09gustoexten => _01522.,1,Dial(SIP/personalvoip,,)
21:29.16p3nguinThat's why it doesn't work.
21:29.36gustobut when i do personalvoip/extension) it behaves the same way
21:29.36p3nguinShould be Dial(SIP/personalvoip/${EXTEN})
21:29.41gustoso so
21:29.51gustoand what should be the extension? the callbacknumber?
21:30.07p3nguinDial(SIP/personalvoip) means you are sending the call TO personal voip.  You don't want to send it TO them, you want to send it VIA them.
21:30.17gustoyes
21:30.21gustoso?
21:30.23p3nguinShow me a phone number you wish to call.
21:30.38gustoehm ... in the logs there are some
21:30.42gustobut ill give you one, w8
21:30.44p3nguinJust type one.
21:31.11gusto"015223817325"
21:31.31gustoover that _1522. extension
21:31.47p3nguinThat would match   exten => _01522.,1,Dial()
21:31.56gustook
21:31.59gustoand then?
21:32.11p3nguinIn that case, ${EXTEN} would = 015223817325
21:32.19p3nguinYou would send 015223817325 to the provider.
21:32.23gustobecause _1522. matches only the number but then what to do with it
21:32.30p3nguinIs that the correct format for phone numbers?
21:32.36gustoi do not care
21:32.40gustow8
21:32.40p3nguinYou have to care.
21:32.52gustoyou said something that may be importatn
21:32.54gustoimportant
21:32.57p3nguinIf you don't send the correct number format, they will not take the call.
21:33.19gustobecause i do not call everytime the same number, so is ${EXTEN} something like a variable?
21:33.25p3nguinyes
21:33.37p3nguin${EXTEN} is the extension that you called.
21:33.43leifmadsenit contained what the pattern matched
21:33.45krotosi've got a boring client that broke my head saying that there are bad quality on phone call. Is out of my network, and only thing i can do is ping, or mtr to his host.
21:33.47gustoso is ${EXTEN} everytime the number for example _1522. matches to?
21:33.54krotosthere is a tool like mtr for measuring jitter?
21:33.58p3nguinIf you called 015223817325 and it matched _1522. then it is 015223817325
21:34.04leifmadsenAsterisk 101...
21:34.14p3nguinIf you called 01522111111111 and it matched _1522. then it is 01522111111111
21:34.19gustook ok
21:34.23gustowe give it a try
21:34.34p3nguinleifmadsen: He can't read the book or something.
21:34.46p3nguinLearning impaired.
21:34.48leifmadsenhttp://asteriskdocs.org/en/3rd_Edition/asterisk-book-html-chunk/asterisk-DP-Basics-SECT-3.html#asterisk-DP-Basics-SECT-3.6.3
21:35.06leifmadsengusto: read the Dialplan Basics chapter....
21:35.26leifmadsenhttp://asteriskdocs.org/en/3rd_Edition/asterisk-book-html-chunk/asterisk-DP-Basics.html
21:35.29p3nguinAs [tk]d-fender put it, he's "exhibiting a very severe learning disability."
21:35.43gustook, one works
21:36.06gustohmm
21:36.11gustoi would put it other way
21:36.23[TK]D-Fender${EXTEN} holds whatever was used in the pattern match you're in.
21:36.31gustotake my sentences / clarifications / definitions and put them into some documentation
21:36.32[TK]D-FenderNot necessarily what was initially called
21:36.49gusto04/04/12 23:33:46 < gusto> so is ${EXTEN} everytime the number for example _1522. matches to?
21:37.00[TK]D-Fender....
21:37.08[TK]D-Fenderthat made no sense
21:37.20p3nguin(1633.19) <gusto> because i do not call everytime the same number, so is ${EXTEN} something like a variable?
21:37.23p3nguin(1633.25) <p3nguin> yes
21:39.58krotoshi guy, there are some situation where is helpfull use/enable jitterbuffer on asterisk
21:40.12krotosand other situation where is not helpfull?
21:42.14leifmadsenp3nguin: ya I can't see what TK says
21:42.58leifmadsenkrotos: not useful when you don't have jitter as it needs to introduce latency
21:43.06leifmadsensince it's a buffer
21:43.49krotosleifmadsen: so, if in my situation i've got a lot of user with 30/50 ping, and instead of this only 6 with wimax connection(ping so hig..jitter too)
21:44.33[TK]D-FenderOn /ignore am I? \o/
21:55.30*** join/#asterisk CyBeRxIxO (~efernande@190.41.182.228)
21:55.48CyBeRxIxOhi again
21:55.49CyBeRxIxOxD
21:56.19*** part/#asterisk wesphillips (~wphill04@137-237-233-124.harris.com)
21:59.45CyBeRxIxOmy current problems are that i get randomly seconds of silent during the call, and when it starts the person im calling cant listen to my untill 3-5seconds after call started... can anyone help me? im getting the g729 licence but im not sure if that will solve my problem
22:01.12*** join/#asterisk gonewage (~gonewage@72.2.130.205)
22:09.35*** join/#asterisk Korolev (~Korolev@201.225.187.210)
22:11.07paolosupinoI'd like to extend a very big thank you for leifmadsen, [TK]D-Fender, p3nguin, kaldemar and everyone else in the channel who planted fear in me of asking stupid question and caused me to look for the correct information before asking… It also made me find the solutions alone :-)
22:16.44*** join/#asterisk tamiel (~tamiel@85-171-171-179.rev.numericable.fr)
22:21.10*** join/#asterisk mzb (~mzb@ppp108-88.static.internode.on.net)
22:32.10pigpenhi all.  I have a new Digium D70 phone.  I am running Asterisk 10.1.2, so the DPMA is not happy with it as of yet (at least that is what they say in the docs)
22:33.09pigpenCan anybody that is currently using this phone with the DPMA grab an example config file, likely in the ftp/tftp/http/https directory as a mac_address.cfg file and post it for me so I can provision it manually?
22:33.19leifmadsenpigpen: well the Asterisk 10 phone branch was just branched today
22:33.36pigpenleifmadsen, you are the bearer of good news.
22:33.50leifmadsenI have zero idea as to the status of said branch
22:33.51leifmadsenbut it does exist
22:34.04pigpennot that I am a complete idiot, but where would I grab it?
22:34.52pigpenI got this in the standard email:  http://downloads.digium.com/pub/telephony/res_digium_phone/
22:34.56pigpenbut it only lists 1.8.11
22:35.03leifmadsensubversion is the only place
22:35.10pigpenk.  under 10.x
22:35.12pigpen?
22:35.32pigpenor is this under a separate tree?
22:35.36leifmadsensigh
22:35.37leifmadsenhttp://svn.asterisk.org/svn/asterisk/branches/
22:35.42leifmadsengotta go, later
22:35.53pigpentks.  yeah, I have svn setup.
22:36.01pigpendidn't know if it was a seperate tree other than 10
22:38.11pigpenoh...seperate branch...10-digiumphones/
22:42.52CyBeRxIxOdoes my sip t9 yealink afect voice qualify? is the cisco better?
22:49.30gustop3nguin: thanks for your help, i would not find out that fast w/o your help
22:50.11*** join/#asterisk Iamnacho (~Iamnacho@ip174-70-136-96.ks.ks.cox.net)
22:50.18gustois tired and goes to sleep
22:50.31*** join/#asterisk ketas (~ketas@ketas6-sixxs.si.pri.ee)
22:51.12*** join/#asterisk mchou (~quassel@unaffiliated/mchou)
22:56.23mjordanpigpen: the 10-digiumphones branch was just created today, so it hasn't gone through the same level of testing that the 1.8-digiumphones branch has (yet).  If you decide to play around with it, let me know how it works for you
22:56.28*** join/#asterisk albertoandrade (~albertoan@186.206.5.67)
22:56.35mjordanpigpen: fyi, it will mirror, at this point in time, 10.4.0-rc1
23:00.18*** join/#asterisk michael-i (~anonymous@204.11.230.58.static.etheric.net)
23:01.04*** join/#asterisk RypPn (~RypPn@unaffiliated/ryppn)
23:15.25*** join/#asterisk ketas (~ketas@ketas6-sixxs.si.pri.ee)
23:24.23*** join/#asterisk CyBeRxIxO (~efernande@190.41.182.228)
23:24.42CyBeRxIxOmy current problems are that i get randomly seconds of silent during the call, and when it starts the person im calling cant listen to my untill 3-5seconds after call started... can anyone help me? im getting the g729 licence but im not sure if that will solve my problem, any advices?
23:24.46CyBeRxIxOty for reading
23:28.17p3nguinDid you ever check the bandwidth like I suggested?  Two ulaw calls will only use up about 160 kb/s, so that's not very much used out of your 20 mbps service.
23:28.32p3nguinChanging to g729 isn't going to solve that jitter you have.
23:33.47CyBeRxIxOmy internet bandwidth is 3Mbps at 25% guarante
23:34.25CyBeRxIxOi kno, poor bandwidth. when i was in spain i had 20mb but here in south americ that is a pain
23:34.36CyBeRxIxO5mb is max bandwidht
23:35.19*** join/#asterisk fisted_ (~fisted@unaffiliated/fisted)
23:59.42*** part/#asterisk mjordan (~mjordan@nat/digium/x-aqtnszpedzustkqk)

Generated by irclog2html.pl Modified by Tim Riker to work with infobot.