irclog2html for #asterisk on 20050511

00:00.17*** join/#asterisk bkw_ (~brian@bkw.developer.and.friend.of.asterisk)
00:00.17*** mode/#asterisk [+o bkw_] by ChanServ
00:03.40docelmoDo we have any knowledgable woomera users in here?
00:06.18messo does any one else get "chan_phone.c:844 phone_mini_packet: Read returned -1: Operation already in progress"
00:06.39meswith quicknet hardware?
00:07.01BeBrAwho can please test my asterisk server with video call?
00:07.33mesor perhaps a better question, does any one have quicknet hardware that doesn't do this?
00:09.42mesit seems to do this on hang up, I expect there is a bounce (on hook/off hook) before the phone channel has shut down properly
00:10.19cursorWill there be a new v1-1 CVS tag/release soon?
00:10.33cursorv1-0 is getting a bit old
00:11.57docelmoits not even a year
00:12.06cursorit must be close
00:12.13mmlj4grandstream budgetone phones... worth my while for here at home, or not?
00:12.17docelmoI was there for the release of 1.0
00:12.29cursor:-)
00:12.40docelmoAnyone know what Woomera is and how to config the .conf files?   Dont need help just need pointed in a direction
00:13.11*** join/#asterisk budi_ (~budi@210.11.72.49)
00:13.51cursorApparently it's a rocket range in Australia
00:14.25*** join/#asterisk newbien (~e@147.241.33.65.cfl.res.rr.com)
00:15.27opus_first you need to point your rocket
00:15.37opus_then, run, save-config and it will generate a .conf file
00:15.37cursorRocket.conf
00:15.52opus_then, you enter your coordinates. it defaults to the whitehouse so be careful
00:16.20Nuggetsee, this is why more sites need to support DNS LOC
00:16.26cursorDon't run XP on your rocket or it'll crash where you least expect it
00:16.31opus_haha
00:16.32BeBrAanyone with eyeBeam?
00:16.42NuggetI have a couple eyeBeam licenses.
00:16.48NuggetI don't use it myself, though
00:16.48opus_yeah, I have about 10 stripper friends who use eyebeam
00:17.09BeBrAI just want to test if I can receive video calls from outside my lan
00:17.10*** join/#asterisk AgiNamu (~AgiNamu@216.230.151.230)
00:17.13opus_sometimes you need to put it on mute
00:17.38BeBrAI can setup an account if any of you can test it
00:17.58opus_is there a free licence? can it use a netcam?
00:18.03opus_i'd like to use it if it did
00:18.05cursorhttp://www.eyebeam.net/
00:18.11Juggiethere is no free license
00:18.19BeBrAopus_: I think you can
00:18.41opus_cool. cuz i got a new axis 206M the other day
00:18.43*** join/#asterisk phatandy (~cardoor30@x186y15.angelo.edu)
00:18.43seanhttp://www.xten.com/index.php?menu=products&smenu=eyebeam
00:18.44opus_1280x1024
00:19.09BeBrAopus_: if you want I can give you the account data
00:19.18opus_let me try to set it up , one sec
00:19.22BeBrAk
00:20.25opus_is it part of the x-lite download?
00:21.24fileEyebeam costs money
00:21.29fileX-Lite is free
00:21.44BeBrAI found this link on voip-info.org: http://builds.xten.net/download/?406208535285a06cd7981976313fdcba
00:21.51cursorTry MythPhone
00:22.04fileneeds a serial BeBrA
00:22.27bkw_lalalla
00:22.50BeBrAhmm
00:23.13*** join/#asterisk tld (~tld@80.203.70.227)
00:24.49*** join/#asterisk malabar (~malabar@164.80-202-124.nextgentel.com)
00:24.53AgiNamuso, anyone wanna discuss building SuperFastEAGI?
00:24.53BeBrAlet me check for another *free* softphone with video
00:25.06blitzragecan someone briefly explain what "dropcount" does to the jitter buffer?
00:25.09blitzragetzanger: ?
00:25.37tzangerblitzrage: I only use the new jb now
00:25.55blitzragetzanger: ok... so what is different? I'm trying to document it for "1.2"
00:26.10Juggiei havnt found a free softphone with video
00:26.14Juggiehas anyone
00:26.17tzangeressentially though the dropcount is (I think) how many frames per 'drop' it's allowed to drop
00:26.25tzangertoo slow and it takes forever for a jitter buffer to shrink
00:26.42tzangertoo fast and it's very audible as the received audio 'speeds up' as the JB shrinks
00:26.46cursorJuggie: http://www.zen13655.zen.co.uk/mythphone.html
00:27.45blitzragetzanger: ok, then what is jittershrinkrate?
00:28.19*** part/#asterisk makhtar (~ageller@mail.bulletinnews.com)
00:28.48tzangerhmm maybe that was jitter shrink rate and dropcount was something else
00:28.50tzangershit man you have the src
00:28.56tzangerit was actually half-assed documented in there
00:29.14blitzragetzanger: hrmmmm... half-assed eh
00:29.19Juggiecursor, thats for linux, and for when you use myth tv
00:29.26cursorright
00:29.30blitzragetzanger: which file, chan_iax2.c ?
00:29.37tzangerblitzrage: yes
00:29.42BeBrAI think also windows messenger can act as soft video phone, isn't it?
00:29.42Juggiedamn, why the hell am i getting stuttery audio when my ping to the server is 30ms
00:29.45cursorIf you're using MS Windows then you should be used to paying for software
00:29.55*** join/#asterisk torisa (lp_ql@soveliss.luniac.com)
00:30.21*** join/#asterisk IronHelix (~irc@ool-182c3fe9.dyn.optonline.net)
00:30.24mepplgute nacht
00:30.27Juggienot really :)
00:31.45*** join/#asterisk outtolunc (~me@ppp-69-237-32-168.dsl.pltn13.pacbell.net)
00:31.55filewhy look who it is, otl!
00:31.57*** join/#asterisk Exstatica (Exstatica@jumping.on.the.bed.are.not.umpteenmonkeys.com)
00:32.21outtoluncyou betchya
00:32.42cursorPut some clothes on
00:32.46cursorthis is a family channel :-)
00:35.02AgiNamuBeBra, no, current Windows Messenger only supports SIP messaging.
00:35.20AgiNamuthe new, "Communicator" product with LCServer -will support conferencing with audio and video
00:35.34mmlj4AgiNamu: um, can't it do H.323 with *?
00:35.39outtoluncand only 'some' versions.. right? (or did they finally add sip to the latest)
00:35.47AgiNamudunno about h323
00:35.49mmlj4or am i thinking of the same application?
00:35.56AgiNamubut with SIP, it can only do messaging
00:36.01AgiNamuwindows has builtin support for h323
00:36.04rvhiwindows messenger should support voice
00:36.06AgiNamui think you are thinking of netmeeting though.
00:36.13mmlj4i'm thinking of netmeeting, sorry
00:36.20mmlj4yeah...
00:36.33*** join/#asterisk Newbie___ (~me@218.208.235.74)
00:36.41Newbie___hi all
00:36.45AgiNamuWindows messenger DOEs support voice. just not with SIP
00:36.47*** join/#asterisk bonez39 (~aint@c-67-166-77-14.hsd1.ut.comcast.net)
00:37.23blitzragetzanger: ok, the one thing I don't understand is how setting dropcount=3 represents 1.5% of frames dropped. Does that mean 10 represents 5% of frames dropped? Or is it a logarithmic number?
00:37.37Newbie___i am trying to connect to a provider that supports H323, where can i find reference material about * to make * does that
00:37.39AgiNamuhaha, just got an invite from MS to go see Star Wars III
00:37.50AgiNamugoogle?
00:37.51tzangerNewbie___: go talk to bkw, he loves h323 now
00:37.58blitzrageAgiNamu: Windows Message DOES support Voice W/ SIP. MSN Messenger does not support SIP.
00:38.03Newbie___bkw_ is always too busy
00:38.05Nethabwoo
00:38.12tzangerblitzrage: uhm...  I *think* that the old JB was 50 frames deep
00:38.20AgiNamublitzrage, you have used it? I used Windows Messenger 5 and didnt see any indication of SIP voice support at all.
00:38.22Newbie___AgiNamu: tried google
00:38.23BeBrAanyway if you have any client capable of video calls I can give you a test account to test my asterisk server...
00:38.26tzanger3/50 is 6% though
00:38.30blitzrageAgiNamu: need 4.6 or 4.7
00:38.39AgiNamu5 doesnt do it? like, they removed it?
00:38.43blitzragetzanger: I still don't understand what the means ;)
00:38.44Newbie___H323 vs SIP , which is better protocol ?
00:38.45Nethabnot MSN messenger, Windows Messenger
00:38.49AgiNamuright, Windows Messenger.
00:38.51blitzrageAgiNamu: yes
00:38.56AgiNamuoh, that's interesting.
00:39.01AgiNamuWell, it's back in the latest client
00:39.08AgiNamuthat's still in beta. or release candidate.
00:39.12blitzrageNewbie___: SIP -> thats an opinionated question and has no answer
00:39.29tzangerNewbie___: IAX2
00:39.31AgiNamuNewbie___, neither. IAX2 is far superior.
00:39.37blitzragetzanger: sorry, didn't see that second line
00:39.44Newbie___blitzrage: i have been using IAX2/SIP and now, H323, damn
00:40.14AgiNamuI have never used H.323.
00:40.26AgiNamubut its my understanding you'll need more love than a NAMBLA meeting can give you to get it working.
00:40.35blitzragetzanger: you're right... 3/50 != 1.5 ?
00:40.36blitzrage:)
00:40.39blitzrageforget the ?
00:40.41AgiNamubut i might be completely wrong, and H.323 works as well as IAX2
00:40.57Nethabi've used h323 only as a side effect of using netmeeting
00:40.59blitzrageAgiNamu: you just need to be able to follow instructions :)
00:41.12swankierNewbie___.... sip
00:41.13AgiNamublitzrage, yea, those requirements must be reduced.
00:41.14blitzragebut H.323 is going the way-side
00:41.15BeBrAif you want to test video: IP:82.52.185.35 user:video2 pass:123 and then call 101
00:41.18Nethabthe h323 support that comes with asterisk doesn't work right now
00:41.23blitzrageall hail kram!
00:41.27swankierNewbie___.... sip is better supported in Asterisk
00:41.31AgiNamui dont think he has returned.
00:41.34Nethabbut a working version is on the wayu
00:41.39AgiNamuI think someone accidentally leaned on the keyboard
00:41.41Newbie___am i right to say that * comes with h323 ? or is an addon ?
00:41.43swankierNethab... what's broken?
00:41.49swankierNewbie... addon
00:41.53AgiNamuthat's connected to the compuiter that has his year old IRC connection running :P
00:41.54Nethabh323 doesn't work out of the box in asterisk
00:42.18Nethabbut there are some working implementations out there for h323 and asterisk
00:44.02BeBrAI see a lot of people is trying to connect to my asterisk server :D
00:44.12Newbie___there is a file h323.conf.sample in my *
00:44.40opus_you need to break it down
00:44.58BeBrAopus_: no one has logged in :P
00:45.02*** join/#asterisk opus_ (opus@dahphish.org)
00:45.11BeBrAopus_: no one has logged in :P
00:47.06opus_bebra -- i don't think i can get it to work with a netcam
00:47.10opus_I have one usbcam, let me try it
00:47.18BeBrAok
00:47.54opus_i just dunno if it will work under vmware
00:48.02opus_i have to hack it a little
00:48.57BeBrAif you have linux I think you can use gnomephone
00:49.09Juggiegnomephone is supposed to be good
00:49.17Juggiegnomemeeting is good too
00:49.46opus_does it work with asterisk
00:50.22BeBrAThe version 2 of GnomeMeeting, named GnomeMeeting NG (Next Generation), also supports the SIP protocol and is usable with the Asterisk SIP channel.
00:50.22BeBrAyes
00:50.49NivexIf they pull it off, they're gonna bury kphone/
00:51.17Juggiehmmm... iax is stuttery for me, but i have a 80ms ping
00:51.21Juggieand tons of bandwidth
00:51.43jessteranyone get a chance to play with Polycom SIP 1.5.x?
00:52.23Nethab1.5 is out?
00:52.26Nethabomg
00:52.29jessternot exactly
00:52.33Nethabi just got 1.4
00:52.40opus_OK, what settings do I need
00:52.46jesster1.5 just got out of beta
00:52.53jessterno public release yet
00:53.00Nethabwhat's new about it
00:54.18jessterwell my first glance is it seems to require bootROM 3.0.x, and my cfg files are not 100% compatible since Line1 auth fails but Line2 (another provider) auths fine. Im requesting a Release Notes doc so I can find out more. Was wondering if anyone else may have seen the Release notes... or admin guide for it
00:55.25Newbie___50-80ms ping result from my box to the provider, is that good voice quality ?
00:55.26|Vulture|jesster: I just know 1.4 is sucky
00:55.45opus_oh this is gnomemeeting 1.0.2
00:55.48opus_i need 2.0?
00:56.11jesster|Vulture|: we've seen improvedment on 1.4 from 1.3.4.002
00:56.27BeBrAhmmm let me check if it was supported on 1.0.2
00:56.37opus_i'm d/l 1.2
00:56.59|Vulture|jesster: did you notice that the phone reboot doesn;t work in 1.4... the holding the 4 bottons?
00:57.07|Vulture|it still moves the volume
00:57.21*** join/#asterisk MikeJ[Laptop] (~jayden@pcp02795302pcs.roylok01.mi.comcast.net)
00:57.37jesster|Vulture|: there is a reboot menu in 1.4 and higher, Menu -> #2 Settings -> then it's option 11 or 12 depending on your phone configuration
00:57.41opus_vuylture i noticed that last night
00:57.49jessterin 1.5 it's in the Admin menu
00:58.00*** join/#asterisk NewSole (dave@i216-58-44-245.avalonworks.net)
00:58.18|Vulture|oh nice
00:58.24opus_i hope it doesn't mind i'm double natted
00:58.27|Vulture|Ill have to try 1.5 when it comes out
00:58.34BeBrAI think 1.0.2 is enough
00:58.40|Vulture|I did like the idea of the VLAN discovery tool
00:58.46jessterI also noticed the bootROM update from 2.6.2 -> 3.0.2 went very smoothly, vs. my prior updates of 2.1.4(?) -> 2.6.2
00:58.47|Vulture|since all my voip is on VLAN 2
00:59.09BeBrAhmm it isn't
00:59.11opus_polycom also does custom roms for various companies.  i have a mgcp polycom ip 500 install
00:59.23jessteropus_: same here
00:59.31opus_shoreteL?
00:59.37opus_bebra - i'm upgrading now
00:59.45BeBrAtnx
01:00.11jessternot sure what shorteL is..
01:03.28*** part/#asterisk darwin35 (~darwin35@24.3.226.147)
01:10.00niZonjeez, sixtel is terrible
01:10.17niZonout of 204 DIDs for almost 2 months
01:10.34niZonand all i heard was "next week"
01:12.30Nethabshoretel is a company
01:12.50Nethabthey used to OEM polycom phones but make their own now
01:17.53mmlj4anyone make a wirless ATA?
01:19.40opus_whats a better IAX client then DIAX?
01:20.11fileohhhhhhhh people who insist on using H323
01:20.13filehttp://bugs.digium.com/bug_view_page.php?bug_id=4233
01:20.29fileoh the twat didn't attach it
01:21.54filehttp://bugs.digium.com/view.php?id=4234 -> voila
01:22.40fileI should accidentally close 4233
01:23.05outtoluncoops i tripped
01:23.24fileMike beat me
01:23.30fileMikeJ[Laptop]: :P
01:30.27opus_<PROTECTED>
01:30.38opus_which "h." is sip?
01:31.02MikeJ[Laptop]hehe
01:33.16pussfellerare you compiling it from cvs opus_
01:33.29opus_yup
01:33.33opus_gnomemeeting
01:33.41opus_openh323 has the --disable-t38 flag
01:37.30BeBrAsee you tomorrow. tnx opus_
01:37.52Newbie___h323 is a pain in the ass
01:38.08cursoruse SIP
01:38.38Newbie___i know, but the provider insisted 323, no SIP/IAX for some security reason
01:38.57Newbie___cant even get * to compile 323 now
01:39.19cursorDid they explain the security reason?
01:40.03opus_dude, openh323 is compiling like a motherfucker
01:40.12|Vulture|can someone try guest@199.227.253.211
01:40.13Newbie___no, all they said was 323 only, for others codec  go find other provider
01:40.31Newbie___opus_: geeting tons of error
01:41.00opus_newbie -- from where did you get the distribution?
01:41.41Newbie___http://www.inaccessnetworks.com/projects/asterisk-oh323/download/asterisk-oh323-0.7.1.tar.gz
01:42.23opus_all of these fucking protocols are crazy
01:42.33opus_image if the www started off with 50 different HTTP protocols
01:42.59opus_shit, http probably would be the best voip protocol ever
01:43.12Newbie___a lot of people will be out of job if protocal are the same
01:43.21opus_thats fine
01:43.23Juggiethere is just 3
01:43.25cursoryes - just imagine if SIP was a text protocol like HTTP
01:43.27cursorerr...
01:43.29cursor:-)
01:43.29Juggieand h323 is dying
01:43.30*** join/#asterisk thetalon (~Administr@pcp05736786pcs.norstn01.pa.comcast.net)
01:43.36Juggiesip is mainstream and iax is niche
01:43.52Juggiemgcp/skinny are limited use
01:44.11cursorIAX is not a standard
01:44.17cursorso it'll have very limited takeup
01:44.28Newbie___i was just wondering, i am giving them business and why the hell should i follow their standard
01:44.42newbien|Vulture|: Contacting  sip:guest@199.227.253.211  User cannot be found at given address
01:45.21|Vulture|hmm okay thanx
01:45.59newbien|Vulture|: k
01:46.23niZonhas anyone used junction networks?
01:46.36cursorno - you're the first
01:46.43cursor:-)
01:47.40Juggiecursor, thats why i said iax was niche
01:48.02cursorright
01:48.09cursorit'll find use in trunks
01:48.36cursorbut I can't see it appearing in lots of phone hardware in the near future
01:49.10newbienare there any good quality voip providers?
01:49.18filedeajvu
01:49.33*** join/#asterisk ahyanne (yahnee@210.1.80.83)
01:51.47newbienk, what are the worst quality voip providers?
01:52.11*** join/#asterisk Smi|k (~Ling@c-069-063-192-006.sd2.redwire.net)
01:52.19thetalonnewbien, all phone co's suck!
01:52.28thetalonfind the one that sucks least for your application
01:53.07thetalonif you are just staring out, try Teliax, Nufone and other's that do IAX
01:53.13newbienthetalon: k, thanks, planning on using iax connection to fwd or direct to voip provider; any suggestions?
01:53.49cursorFWD works best with SIP
01:53.55cursorI find that to be the case
01:54.09newbiencursor: k, thanks
01:54.12cursorMost FWD users use SIP, so if you use IAX then you're routed through a translation server
01:54.14thetaloneach company has a default config
01:54.21cursorotherwise you just reinvite and talk direct
01:54.26thetalonfind a company who's default config fits your requirements
01:54.31Smi|kwhats the cheapest way to get incoming lines
01:54.33*** join/#asterisk kb1_kanobe (~krisbouti@h24-207-80-55.cst.dccnet.com)
01:54.45opus_a pencil or sharpie
01:54.48Smi|klol
01:54.56Smi|kreliable phone lines
01:55.04opus_hehe
01:55.05*** join/#asterisk Sedorox (brandon@Neptune-W.client.wlgrv.pa.sed6.net)
01:55.22Smi|kor can I use a single # and make it multiple phone lines as more people call the one
01:55.31opus_my opinion is to start your own phone company, if you can.
01:56.13cursorOne VoIP number can receive multiple incoming calls - depending upon your provider
01:56.18opus_broadvoice, when it is up, (usually they are down 24/7 for maintence, esp since april 420), lets you have a shitload of incoming lines. voicepulse lets you have 5
01:56.34Smi|khow many incoming calls?
01:56.35*** join/#asterisk _kb1_kanobe (~krisbouti@h24-207-80-55.cst.dccnet.com)
01:56.48opus_i racked up about 4 before i ran out of hands
01:57.04cursoror get a US toll-free number, where you pay for incoming calls, and you can probably have as many simultaneous calls as you like
01:57.17opus_i just don't like giving people 1-800 numbers
01:57.25Smi|k800# is per minute
01:57.29opus_Its just doesn't look good for business
01:57.38Smi|kif it is non-800 then no per minute
01:57.47opus_shit, if you can't afford to call me long distance I don't want to do business with you
01:57.51filenon-800 depends on the provider
01:57.59cursorhttp://www.ipkall.com/
01:58.10cursorget a free Washington State number
01:58.10Smi|k10 people answering phone for 1 line without needing 10 incoming #'s with ring-down
01:58.22Smi|kneed business stabilitiy though
01:58.23*** join/#asterisk Rick_Hunter (~rhunter@05-134.008.popsite.net)
01:58.31opus_smilk - i'
01:58.44opus_smilk - if you need business standard, just get your own PRI
01:58.58Smi|kpri = $$$$$$$
01:59.17Smi|k10 ip lines can run on a dsl
01:59.56cursorThat depends upon the DSL :-)
01:59.58Smi|kif 1 # can handle it for $10/month free incoming then I have 10 lines for $10/month, $1 each
02:00.21Smi|kif I go PRI then it is $600+ for 24 lines = $300 for 10 = $30 each
02:00.32opus_you resell them,
02:00.48cursorA broken PRI will probably be fixed within the hour
02:00.53opus_smi|k-voip.com
02:00.57cursora broken DSL might be fixed before Christmas
02:01.04thetalonif you intent to make $$$ in your business then you need a PRI
02:01.15thetalonor go budget and get some POTS lines
02:01.19filethere's no ifs ands or buts
02:01.26opus_i got a quote for a PRI $200
02:01.35Smi|kpri t1?
02:01.35thetalonI pay less
02:01.42thetalon$160 for LD PRI's
02:01.48opus_can you set your own DNIS?
02:02.01thetalonnot dnis, that is sent to you
02:02.05thetalonyou can set your own ANI
02:02.34opus_well, pla.org can change anybody's dnis
02:02.35Smi|k160? where do you get these rates?
02:02.35opus_:)
02:02.46thetalonVerizon to Global Crossing
02:02.53thetalonBYOL
02:02.57Smi|kdata t1 I get 349, voice is much more
02:02.57thetalonbring your own loop
02:03.21Smi|kof the 349 I think $202 goes to SBC for the loop or something
02:03.33Smi|konce I have the loop can I add more too it?
02:03.38_kb1_kanobepla.org = Public Library Association... nasty hackers that bunch.
02:04.32opus_www.phonelosers.org/ whoopts
02:06.09opus_damn, nobody is on
02:06.49Smi|kso who do I call for a low cost PRI?
02:06.57Smi|kand when you say PRI do you mean PRI T1?
02:07.22opus_if your not sure, just start making up acronyms and asking them if they support it
02:08.00opus_try XO they seem to be cheap
02:08.52filePRI is the signalling... T1 is the medium
02:08.58fileover which it happens
02:09.47*** join/#asterisk Carp1 (carp_xigon@ip-204-97-151-137.modem.logical.net)
02:10.41cursorYou really want an LBZ-5
02:13.05*** join/#asterisk Evanrude (~david@wsip-68-15-251-34.dl.dl.cox.net)
02:14.15blitzragebindaddr - how are multiple addresses specified? On one line like
02:14.15blitzragebindaddr=10.10.10.1,192.168.1.1
02:14.15blitzrageOr spanning lines, like:
02:14.15blitzragebindaddr=10.10.10.1
02:14.16blitzragebindaddr=192.168.1.1
02:14.51*** join/#asterisk kimo_sabe (nick@zappa.azrackspace.net)
02:14.52Smi|kits just so expensive to use T1 for voice with PRI
02:15.30daorkSmi|k: depends how many you guy
02:15.31daorkbuy*
02:15.53Smi|kat what point is it not more expensive?
02:16.05daorknot more expensive than what?
02:16.16daorkand, i cant answer that for you
02:16.18outtoluncdepends what you spend for 'business lines'
02:16.24Smi|kthan other options such as paying voip phone co for a line and using T1 data, or using business phone lines
02:16.38Smi|kseem to be on average about $10-$12 per month per line either route
02:16.42outtoluncours run about $23-24/mo/per line
02:17.00outtoluncthat's with nothing special on them
02:17.05daorkSmi|k: and you call that expensive?
02:17.12Smi|k$10-12 is not expensive
02:17.14outtoluncsounds like res rates <G>
02:17.21Smi|kwhen I look at PRI T1 it gets expensive
02:17.25daorkoh
02:17.26daorkright
02:17.32daorknegotiate
02:17.39daorkif you buy more, they get cheaper
02:17.44outtolunchaha
02:17.45Smi|kis there such thing as a PRI T3?
02:17.46daorktypically
02:18.04outtoluncwe used to have 40/60 1MB's per site
02:18.22outtoluncthere was no 'qty' breakout <G>
02:18.57Smi|kI see
02:19.19outtoluncwhere you 'could' make deals was the cost per minute/and accounting times
02:19.29Smi|khow does the FWD service manage to give away free #'s?
02:19.38outtoluncbased only monthly minutes
02:20.13Smi|ki.e. with a PRI can I redirect calls coming to my line to IP phones and release them from the PRI network
02:20.30Smi|kso one PRI number can be used to route calls to many ip phones
02:20.45Smi|kor do the PRI numbers work the same as normal ones - one call per line
02:20.50outtoluncdepending on the proto
02:21.17Smi|kI need a way to decrease cost per "extension" on a single incoming number with simutanious calls
02:21.50outtoluncif an incoming call maintains the pstn connection, that is 1 channel in use
02:22.07outtolunc(which is usually the case)
02:22.59outtoluncit's that simple
02:23.06Smi|kI see
02:23.21Smi|kto pass the call along to another number and remove it from my network...
02:23.36mmlj4grandstream budgetone phones... worth my while for here at home, or not?
02:23.43outtoluncif you are doing backend magic.. user connects pstn, and enters a callback ip... then drop the pstn connect.. and go ip well thats a diff story
02:23.43Smi|kcurrently I use SBC and they let me transfer calls to external #'s and it clears it from my bank of numbers, they call it "call transfer disconnect"
02:24.09kimo_sabeSmi|k: where are you transfering to?
02:24.18Smi|kis there any clean way to do that where the system calls the # it is going to, then releases the call to that # without actually releasing the line to the new number until after its verified
02:24.43Smi|kI want to transfer my incoming calls to a 2ndary number while playing music to the caller during the transfer
02:25.01Smi|kwith SBC's service I need to tell them "you will hear clicking sounds, but you are not being disconnected, its part of the transfer"
02:25.21Smi|ktransfering to standard PSTN lines nationwide
02:25.24outtoluncthe point being if that audio steam is still coming down that pri, how would it then 'magically' make itself jump mysteriously to you without using a channel
02:26.14Smi|kwhen SBC offers it I can do it without the "magic" and it is considered a 3-way call, or with the "magic" feature (call transfer disconnect - works only for INCOMING calls) to remove it from my call bank and reroute it
02:26.27Smi|krather than taking up 2 lines it takes up 0
02:26.35outtoluncregardless of 'call type' it still uses a channel <G>
02:26.45outtolunc(that is if you are still getting audio)
02:26.49Smi|kI'm not
02:26.53Smi|konce it transfers its GONE
02:27.04Smi|kif no one picks up at the # I transfer it to, the caller is gone, I cant get them back
02:27.26Carp1I have an idea...
02:27.32Carp1park them
02:27.33outtoluncyou mean transfer OFF that pri
02:27.37Smi|kyes
02:27.40Carp1call the person you're transfering to
02:27.40Smi|ktransfer OFF the PRI
02:27.43outtoluncwell then obviously yes
02:27.52Smi|ki.e.
02:27.56Carp1if they dont answer, call them back, if the person does answer, tell them what to dial
02:28.01Carp1:)
02:28.08outtolunci'm sure i stated 'while still receiving audio' part <G>
02:28.14Smi|kright now it ties up 1 line (incoming call) and then I can transfer them off of my line to a new one so I have 0 lines occupied
02:28.37outtoluncok i'd like to see that
02:28.50outtolunca channel is in use 'somewhere'
02:28.51Smi|kI want to have it tie up 1 line (incoming call) and then I connect to the other extension (2 lines tied up) and then "pass" the call so I have 0 again
02:29.04_kb1_kanobesmi|k: you're refering to 2B Channel Transfer? You have a caller coming in who you want to bounce to a different location w/o burning up two channels?
02:29.17Smi|kwhile SBC calls the service "call transfer disconnect" it is more like "disconnect - call transfer"
02:29.17Juggiethat doesnt exist in asterisk
02:29.27bkw_haha
02:29.28Juggieexcept on 5ESS
02:29.30_kb1_kanobeJuggie: it's made it as far as libpri.
02:29.37Juggieonly in 5ESS
02:29.38outtoluncbut then it's a RE-connect, not constant audio
02:29.49Juggienot on dms100/qsig
02:30.03_kb1_kanobeJuggie: Guess I'll have to keep waiting then. :-)
02:30.03Smi|kbut if I can connect both the lines using 2 lines then I can ensure the transfer is complete
02:30.12Smi|knot just guess and hope that their call was answered when transfered
02:30.15Juggiewe (my work) was going to pay cres, to do it...
02:30.16outtolunche doesn't still receive audio within HIS system, the dms does
02:30.19Juggiebut we got sidetracked
02:30.22Smi|ki.e. make it more like an inter-office transfer and less like off-the-network transfer
02:30.27Juggiewe ar estill going to tho
02:30.29Smi|kbut then shift it off the network later
02:30.35outtoluncanyways
02:31.00_kb1_kanobeJuggie: I have 56 lines, 11 of which are trunks at this location. We'd love 2bct, but the telco hasn't provisioned the option yet at the co!
02:31.30_kb1_kanobeIt's on their tariff card, but 'there hasn't been sufficient demand'...
02:31.47Smi|kso the service I need is "2bct" and thats something the telco can offer?
02:32.03Smi|kvoip providers often offer 2bct with the line correct?
02:32.07Juggie_kb1_kanobe, join #libpri and offer money :)
02:32.18_kb1_kanobeDoes Telus hang out there?
02:32.31Juggieno, the developers of libpri do
02:41.33*** join/#asterisk crash3m (crash3m@crash3m.user)
02:41.54crash3mhow do I tell how many calls are currently in progress?
02:42.15fileshow channels
02:42.26Carp1hey file...
02:42.32filehi
02:43.00outtoluncdouble expresso
02:43.06outtoluncup... steady
02:43.07Carp1Did you release that app?
02:43.51fileI haven't even had time to properly do it because it violates core logic
02:45.01outtoluncgoto's x+101,playback(really) <G>
02:45.12filereallllllllllllly
02:45.14outtolunchehe
02:46.05Carp1OK.
02:46.08*** join/#asterisk TheEmperor (~user@203.114.48.47)
02:53.38*** join/#asterisk implicit (~implicit@ip68-5-148-1.oc.oc.cox.net)
03:11.45*** join/#asterisk shmaltz (~chatzilla@69.28.255.210)
03:12.00shmaltzanybody know what this error means:
03:12.02shmaltzapp_dial.c:512 wait_for_answer: Unable to forward frame
03:12.07drbrowntzanger: Did you get your fax machine to work?
03:12.25tzangerdrbrown: didn't get a chance to try
03:17.03shmaltzWhen I try to bridge calls between zap (PRI) channels I sometimes get:
03:17.05shmaltzapp_dial.c:512 wait_for_answer: Unable to forward frame
03:17.07shmaltzanybody have any clue what it means?
03:17.32tzangershmaltz: it's fine
03:17.33*** join/#asterisk PCadach (~paul@www.east.telecom.kz)
03:17.40tzangerit just means the bridge took a second to come in
03:17.50tzangerit is not a bad thing by any means
03:17.55TheEmperordoes anyone know what this means?
03:17.57TheEmperorWARNING[3198]: app_voicemail.c:3356 vm_execmain: Couldn't read username
03:17.58shmaltztzanger, but whenever I get those messages the call doesn't complete
03:18.05tzanger??
03:18.26tzangerenable PRI debug then or NoOp(HANGUPCAUSE is ${HANGUPCAUSE})
03:18.27shmaltzit doesn't complete, for outside callers they get the toodoolee tone
03:18.34tzangerand make sure Dial() has the 'g' flag
03:18.52shmaltzwhat does the g do?
03:18.56shmaltzcontinue
03:18.59shmaltzgot it
03:22.39TheEmperorcan anyone help? i've got musiconhold all installed properly but i can't seem to hear anything when i am using sip
03:22.42TheEmperorcould it be a nat issue?
03:25.57*** join/#asterisk jaxxan (~jaxxan@202.70.125.109)
03:26.37TheEmperorweird, when i use iax2 there is no problem and i can hear the musiconhold
03:27.14*** join/#asterisk tzafrir (~tzafrir@62.90.10.53)
03:27.18newbienTheEmperor: softphone using sip?
03:27.30TheEmperoryes
03:28.13newbienTheEmperor: the softphone is locking the alsa or OSS for its use only, imho
03:29.35TheEmperoralsa oss what is that?
03:30.12Corydon76-home~alsa
03:30.14jbotwell, alsa is the Advanced Linux Sound Architecture, or at http://www.alsa-project.org/
03:30.17newbienTheEmperor: locking the soundcard for exclusive use for softphone
03:30.26Corydon76-home~oss
03:30.27jbotProvides sound card drivers for most popular sound cards under Linux. URL: http://www.opensound.com/
03:31.56TheEmperorhow come when i use iax2 it is no problem?
03:32.10newbienTheEmperor: no easy work around for that problem from my newbie viewpoint
03:32.26TheEmperorguess i have to use iax2 then..
03:32.46newbienTheEmperor: yea, go with what works ;)
03:33.10*** join/#asterisk [hC] (~hardcore@c-69-180-109-192.hsd1.fl.comcast.net)
03:33.51[hC]aside from testing which context a call originated from, is there any way to tell if a call is originating from a local exteionsion, as opposed to an incoming call, etc?
03:33.56[hC](in extensions.conf that is)
03:35.49newbien< google> call origin astersisk: http://www.southamptonnj.org/Bulletinboard.html
03:36.02*** join/#asterisk FanPF (~anar@202.179.19.82)
03:36.05newbienoops, ast*
03:36.16FanPFhi ppl,
03:36.17akshunwhat are some popular ip phone models that work well with asterisk
03:36.36FanPFi want to buy asterisk complete ready solution
03:36.42FanPFis there avialable
03:36.46FanPF?
03:37.07FanPFwith hardwar , phones etc...
03:37.11thetalonFanPF, there are many...
03:37.26thetalonbut you should spend the time to understand what you are building cuz you'll be supporting it
03:38.00FanPFwe have 3 branches in different location
03:38.13thetalondo you have a common carrier or a Private WAN?
03:38.15FanPFcurrently using traditianl PBX
03:38.19FanPFbut DDD cost very high
03:38.25*** join/#asterisk sudhir492 (~sudhir@4.7.59.175)
03:38.28*** join/#asterisk aminorex (~tony@c66.191.69.132.dul.mn.charter.com)
03:38.34FanPFnot yet, but we can create it
03:39.05FanPFPBX which we are using doesn't support IP network
03:39.28FanPFWe connection between offices e1 connection
03:39.37FanPFWe connecting between offices e1 connection
03:40.20brc_what is hardwar?
03:40.32FanPFi tried to install asterisk. But i think best commercial edition
03:40.54FanPFasterisk installed hardware with voice cards
03:41.01FanPFand IP phones
03:41.07brc_I can put you in contact with a company who has extensive experence with enterprise Asterisk deployment
03:41.15brc_what's your email address?
03:41.20FanPFcurrently i don't know which phones are supported and which is good
03:41.32akshunthat's what i was asking
03:41.33FanPFmy email address is anar@mongol.net
03:41.42sudhir492I use Polycom IP-500 phones for all commercial use
03:41.56brc_FanPF, okay, I will pass your email address along and ask them to contact you
03:41.59brc_what's your name?
03:42.11sudhir492Have around 200 of those installed, and businesses are very happy with those
03:42.11FanPFif is there someone supporting commecrial edition to please contact with me
03:42.15FanPFmy name is Anar
03:42.20brc_great
03:42.25FanPFSystem's administrator
03:42.58sudhir492FanPF: what is your requirement?
03:43.27FanPFIP and analog both type of phone would be supported
03:43.46FanPFand branches will be connect using IP network
03:44.09FanPFCall duration and call credit support
03:44.29FanPFit mean our boss can monitor each subscribers call time
03:44.46fileget a switchvox and run with it
03:45.28blitzrageyo yo
03:45.42FanPFit based on asterisk?
03:45.46fileyes
03:46.01blitzragewhat is the format of bindaddr if you want to bind to multiple interfaces?
03:46.20FanPFdon't know yet
03:46.22Nuggetjust bind them all and let pf sort it out.  :)
03:46.23thetalon0.0.0.0
03:46.37bkw_well well
03:46.45bkw_iax2 has an issue if you bind to alias'ed interfaces
03:46.54blitzrageI love the answers people give when they don't know the answer :)
03:46.54Nuggetah.
03:46.55bkw_if you try to auth on an aliased inerface it won't work
03:47.03bkw_doesn't mattter
03:47.05bkw_even dual nicks
03:47.06bkw_er nic's
03:47.11bkw_same issue will come up
03:47.16Nuggetthat hasn't been an issue for me.  what's the problem?
03:47.18blitzragebkw_: so you should only ever bind to one address?
03:47.27blitzragebkw_: so I should never have multiple bindaddr?
03:47.28bkw_blitzrage, unless you do ACL type auth
03:47.34Nuggetmy asterisk box has a foot on my public network and another in my private network with no problems.
03:47.35bkw_I don't recommend it
03:47.35*** part/#asterisk thetalon (~Administr@pcp05736786pcs.norstn01.pa.comcast.net)
03:47.42outtoluncping me baby <G>
03:47.48bkw_Nugget, and you do auth on both interfaces without an issue?
03:48.04blitzrageso no... :)
03:48.05NuggetSIP on both.  IAX on one.
03:48.11bkw_do iax on both
03:48.14NuggetI have no internal IAX clients.
03:48.14bkw_it won't work right
03:48.18Nuggetnutty.
03:48.20Nuggetwhat's it do?
03:48.23bkw_you'll get rejected on one or the other
03:48.32bkw_its like the addr it comes in on is matched wrong
03:48.35bkw_thus it rejects
03:48.42bkw_I tried to tell someone about this.. so did anthm
03:48.48Nuggetweird.  I'm glad I never bought that IAXy I've been meaning to buy.  :)
03:48.51bkw_we dont' do auth on our internal stuff now becuase of that bug
03:49.23drbrownDigium is going to release a new version of the IAXy
03:49.51blitzragewell, off to bed then I guess, thanks for the help bkw_
03:52.51Newbie___hey bkw_: heard you are working on h323 ?
03:55.45bkw_http://bugs.digium.com/view.php?id=4234
03:55.48bkw_try that
03:57.49cursor:-)
03:57.52outtolunchehe
04:00.08outtoluncif ($resp) { print "eh?"; }else{ print "incoming!"; };
04:00.36cursorperl -le 'print "Asterisk!!!"   ^qq^\f\034\033\026\027I#\016OHR^'
04:00.42bkw_hahahahah
04:00.44outtoluncsad, but i'm extremely tired
04:01.10bkw_cursor, I love that one
04:01.16cursor:-)
04:01.33outtolunc(NOW i remember you <G>)
04:01.37cursorhaha
04:01.40bkw_hahahahah
04:01.54outtolunchehe
04:01.57bkw_the moosepenis thing was my doing :P
04:02.10cursorI guessed :-)
04:02.31*** join/#asterisk smash- (~smash@c-24-20-42-19.hsd1.or.comcast.net)
04:02.38smash-hey how do u register a new nick with freenode?
04:02.40smash-i forgot
04:02.44smash-sorry off channel topic
04:02.52cursor/msg nickserv help
04:02.55outtoluncit's just 9pm here and i'm like totally beat
04:03.04*** join/#asterisk kb1_kanobe (~krisbouti@h24-207-80-55.cst.dccnet.com)
04:03.05cursor5:03am here
04:03.17bkw_cursor, what country?
04:03.22cursorEngland
04:03.26bkw_ah
04:03.28*** join/#asterisk dr123 (~temp@12-202-51-38.client.insightBB.com)
04:03.29cursorWhere else? :-)
04:03.30smash-9pm here
04:03.33smash-tanks
04:03.38outtoluncand you have a cup of coffee you are admiring
04:03.39smash-thanks cursor
04:03.52cursorcoffee?
04:03.56cursorNo - tea
04:04.12outtolunccaffinated right?
04:04.17cursor/ctcp cursor time
04:04.17dr123Howdy everyone... I was wondering and I know this will only take a second to answer i want to do this: i was trying to configure my asterisk server this way SIPPHONE --> Asterisk Server1 ====INTERNET w/ NAT ===> Asterisk Server2 --> Sip Phone I use SIP on both internal networks and I want to use IAX protcal over internet to transverse nat and it is not working
04:04.18outtoluncsame diff
04:05.09outtoluncwell it's probably not working because you 'thinking' it needs help
04:05.14dr123haha
04:05.39outtoluncseriously
04:05.46dr123well i tried registering both servers in IAX.conf and added the line in extensions to dial the other server @ _41X.,1,Dial(etcetcetc...
04:06.18dr123i dont think i have the registrations correct or the extenion thing right... but i am not sure
04:06.19cursorconnect to asterisk using -vvvv on the remote server and see what you get when you try to call
04:06.22dr123i can paste what i have
04:06.25outtoluncif your asterisk box 'know's how to dial your client, then only the iax proto itself needs to 'be allowed to pass' NOT forwarded
04:06.25cursornooo
04:06.27cursorpastebin
04:06.28dr123yeah ... let me paste that
04:06.47dr123- Executing Dial("SIP/1100-13d4", "bar/9999|30") in new stack
04:06.47dr123== Everyone is busy/congested at this time
04:06.47dr123-- Executing Congestion("SIP/1100-13d4", "") in new stack
04:06.47dr123== Spawn extension (home, 419999, 2) exited non-zero on 'SIP/1100-13d4'
04:07.01outtoluncwhen the hell did SIP come into this
04:07.08dr123i have sip phones on both sides
04:07.17dr123but I want to go through the 2 servers via IAX
04:07.26outtoluncoops misread
04:07.30dr123that is ok
04:07.38dr123that is what is confusing....
04:07.40MikeJ[Laptop]~pastebin
04:07.41jbotit has been said that pastebin is a place to paste your stuff without flooding the channel - try http://pastebin.ca
04:07.46outtoluncnp, yeah sip can be a real PITA
04:07.47outtolunc<G>
04:07.49bkw_since when is bar/
04:07.51bkw_a channel?
04:08.05dr123bar/ the server
04:08.08bkw_no
04:08.17bkw_BAR/ <- is not a channel driver
04:08.19dr123i have bar = IAX2/user:pass@host
04:08.23*** join/#asterisk Jabroni (~Hercules@red-corp-200.76.249.142.telnor.net)
04:08.24bkw_no
04:08.25bkw_you don't
04:08.36bkw_you NEVER do that anyway
04:08.39bkw_not best practices
04:08.41bkw_setup a peer
04:08.42cursorthen you need ${BAR}
04:08.52cursorand as bkw said, you don't want passwords in your configs
04:08.56cursorunless in iax.conf
04:09.05bkw_then dial IAX2/remoteuser@localpeername/${EXTEN}
04:09.30dr123and let remoteuser in iax.conf have the user/pass and host stuff
04:09.38JabroniGuys question.. what other parameters others than username/secret are used in order to authenticate to asterisk ?? My sipura 3000 box seems that cant register on the asterisk box, after checking the debug messages its returning a sip error 401
04:09.39dr123so like [remoteuser] the below that stuff
04:12.09bkw_Jabroni, the proxy/host to register with?
04:12.13bkw_can't get far without that eh
04:12.22outtoluncwell it better be [specificremoteuser] <G>
04:12.23Jabronii consider that obvios :p
04:12.30Jabronielse wont see the sip debug messages
04:12.32Jabroni;p
04:12.35Jabronion asterisk
04:13.01cursordouble-check the username and secret
04:13.04cursorcase-sensitive etc.
04:13.36Jabronichecked.. im using asterisk@home.. still i changed on the sip_additional.conf just to be sure they are the same
04:13.37Jabroniand yes
04:13.37outtoluncand make sure you didn't leave the "<"username">" wrapped around it.. yes i had someone actually do that
04:14.13outtolunc(for the password either)
04:14.25Jabroni[204]
04:14.25Jabroniusername=204
04:14.25Jabronitype=friend
04:14.26Jabronisecret=204
04:14.35bkw_host=dynamic
04:15.16Jabronii got 4 other clients registered without a prob.. 2 sipura spa841 and a sipura2000
04:15.19Newbie___is there a way to check if my * has 323 installed?
04:15.42Jabronithe only difference.. is that im trying to connect to the box that is behind nat.. but ports are forwared and such
04:15.55cursoreeew
04:17.49JabroniTransmitting (no NAT):
04:17.49JabroniSIP/2.0 401 Unauthorized
04:17.49JabroniVia: SIP/2.0/UDP 192.168.1.137:5070;branch=z9hG4bK-7d206692
04:17.55outtoluncis there anyway to use an asterisk box infront of the nat to talk iax to the one behind it
04:18.09Jabronithe diggest realm has something to do ?
04:18.22[hC]people try to do the strangest stuff
04:18.23[hC]god i hate nat.
04:18.50outtoluncnat is nat, and therefore has to be dealt with
04:18.50Jabroninat is very common this days
04:19.03cursorRun NAT on the Asterisk box
04:19.12Jabronistill it sucks how weak is sip with nat :(
04:19.15*** join/#asterisk FaithX (~Faithful@202-6-145-116.ip.adam.com.au)
04:19.33[hC]I use nat all over the place and i dont have to forward ports or do any lame stuff, it just works so long as nat traversal is enabled properly
04:19.34Juggiesip can pass any nat if you understand it
04:19.55Juggiei have client behind nat and server behind nat
04:19.58Juggieand it works just fine
04:20.11Jabronibut requires tweaking on each side
04:20.53Juggieits not too bad
04:21.34Jabroniregistering sip on asterisk doesnt require anything special with nat right?
04:21.57outtoluncdepends where the asterisk box is i'd assume <G>
04:22.16Jabroniboth server and clients are behind nat
04:22.18Jabronibut
04:22.23Jabroniserver is on dmz
04:22.42outtoluncand doing firewalling?
04:22.53Jabroninop
04:23.07Jabronisip client connecting gets a 401 :/
04:24.22outtoluncif the asterisk box is in the dmz. and there is no firewall, a sip client behind the firewall should be able to register, that doesn't mean incoming (if not properly setup) would connect to the sip client
04:24.53Jabroniright
04:24.58outtoluncer behind the router
04:25.16JabroniWWW-Authenticate: Digest realm="asterisk", nonce="0ffc0712"
04:25.18outtolunchow old is your router? is it stateful?
04:25.37Jabroniall sip messages uses that digest realm?
04:26.02Jabronidell router
04:26.12Jabronilike 1 year old
04:26.13outtoluncwhat model?
04:26.21outtoluncis it doing tagging?
04:26.31outtoluncfor like QOS
04:26.38Jabronino
04:26.40Jabronino QOS on it
04:26.43outtoluncvlan?
04:26.45Jabronino
04:26.49Jabroniits a simple router
04:26.58outtoluncthen why is it there <G>
04:27.05outtoluncjust kidding <G>
04:27.14Jabronii do have a wrt54gs here at home :p
04:27.22Jabroniwith sveasoft firmware
04:27.29outtoluncwhich version?
04:27.33Jabroni2
04:27.41outtoluncno the sveasoft version
04:27.46Jabronioh
04:27.53JabroniWAIT
04:27.54Jabronidoooh
04:28.01JabroniROLF
04:28.04outtolunchehe
04:28.04Jabronididnt remember
04:28.09Jabronii forgot to upgrade to 1.0.3
04:28.13Jabroni1.0 had issues
04:28.16Jabroniwith sip
04:28.21outtolunceh?
04:28.38Jabroniim using talisman
04:29.08outtoluncthe voip 'version' isn't released yet? (or so i thought)
04:29.14Jabronino it isnt
04:29.24outtoluncthen what the hell are you talking about <G>
04:29.26Jabronithey need to first get a working version
04:29.30Jabronibugfree
04:29.53outtoluncyou have the talisman 'basic' right?
04:29.57Jabroniyup
04:30.06outtoluncok
04:30.07Jabronicant wait for the hotstop version one
04:30.19Jabronihotspot
04:30.21outtoluncyou mean hotspot <G>
04:30.24outtolunck
04:30.42outtolunc<- only as dense as a forest
04:30.57*** join/#asterisk Mw3 (mw3@daisy.chains.ch)
04:31.08outtoluncso are you using vlan/qos on that router
04:31.23Jabroninot yet
04:31.29Jabronii was going to start messing with qos
04:31.34Jabronibut it has a bug that u cant edit the application list
04:31.36Jabroniand change ports
04:31.41Jabronicuz i use all different ports
04:31.48Jabronilike bittorrent/emule et
04:31.49Jabronietc
04:31.52outtoluncand if you fireup ethereal and watch the packets to the asterisk box (from either side) what happens?
04:32.15Jabronihavent gotten so far.. ive just been playing for the past hour with this
04:32.42outtoluncwell i'm assuming you home router is doing nat also
04:33.03outtoluncso your sipclient, is natted, and the asterisk box is natted (but in the dmz)
04:33.10outtoluncright?
04:33.59Jabroniyup
04:34.03outtolunc(fyi: this is your prob)
04:34.10Jabroniand i have rtp and sip ports forwarded on the client
04:34.21outtoluncit's called double natted, regardless of the dmz
04:34.23Jabronilemme upgrade the firmware of the linksys
04:34.44outtoluncand will require special settings to even act semi normally
04:34.58outtoluncyou aren't understanding
04:35.08Jabroniim do following u...
04:35.16outtoluncit's the fact that both client and host are 'truely' behind nat
04:35.17Jabronitrust me.. the firmware is doing something
04:35.24Jabronii readed on the bug list of the version that im using
04:35.28outtoluncok
04:35.41outtoluncat least now you are pointed in the right direction
04:36.13Jabronii came here just to see if there was not somethin special with sip for auth
04:36.24outtoluncit's config's
04:36.27Jabronii know a bit bout networking
04:36.32outtoluncthey must be set 'just right'
04:36.35Jabronirouting and such
04:36.46Jabronithat if i do a sip show peers it needs to show the external ip
04:36.52Jabroniso clients can connect
04:36.59Jabronihave all client with canreinvite disabled
04:36.59outtoluncand without an asterisk box on your 'client' side it's a bitch (for lack of a better word)
04:37.22Jabroniyeah... i was thinking on having an asterisk server ran on a linksys
04:37.29Jabronithere is actually a bin out there for MIPS
04:37.38Jabroninot sure how many channels it can handle
04:37.48Jabroniactive channels that is
04:37.58outtoluncmake sure to look at all the possible config entries in your /usr/src/asterisk/config/sip.conf.sample
04:38.03*** join/#asterisk ptblank (~MURDER1@68-169-176-137.lmdaca.adelphia.net)
04:38.27outtoluncnotes: this is the reason i don't use sip <G>
04:39.00Jabroniyeah iax is the way to go
04:39.15outtoluncit is, in certain envirs
04:39.33outtoluncsip in the internet realm or localnet realm is fairly good
04:39.57outtoluncit's 'crossing the great divide' that is a bitch
04:40.14Jabroniin theory onces i get the sip client working.. i shouldnt have trouble connecting to any number right?
04:40.29Jabronisince all sip connections are "proxied" with asterisk?
04:40.34Jabroni(media channels)
04:40.43outtoluncin theory, once you get ONE side working the OTHER side will still be an issue
04:41.29outtoluncsides being talk paths
04:42.33outtoluncso, IF you do alot of configs, you 'may' get both sides working, but it will probably be only for ONE client
04:42.59cursorhttp://www.bushorchimp.com/
04:43.11outtoluncif you want multiple clients working, you truely need a gateway/asterisk box on the client side
04:43.55outtoluncsomething to encapsulate those packets as a forwarder
04:44.18outtoluncwhew <G>
04:45.08outtolunci'm guessing he just reflashed <G>
04:47.05hardwireok
04:47.16hardwireso g729 over an IAX channel is slopping up 20kbps
04:47.19hardwireis that nominal?
04:48.18firestrmdoes anyone here know if deltathree allows you to send CID strings? the wierd default number is confusing many that i call.
04:49.25Qwellfirestrm: Did you get everything straightened out earlier?
04:50.30firestrmQwell, no, still waiting for nuphone to credit my account.. emailed them on it, jeremy's response was," we'll get around to it".
04:51.11Silik0nhmmmmm
04:51.11firestrmits very dissapointing because i so badly want to get away from deltathree..
04:51.45outtoluncare you sure you emailed 'support@nuphone.net' {giggles}
04:52.05jeffikfirestrm: you looking just for outbound?
04:52.08Qwellyeah...sorry to hear that.  They're usually pretty good...
04:52.15firestrmouttolunc, actually i emailed sales@nuphone.net
04:52.19Qwellnufone?
04:52.20Qwell.net
04:52.31outtoluncthats the real joke it's NUFONE.net
04:52.32firestrmer.. ya nufone.net
04:52.34outtoluncnot ph
04:52.52dr123anyone here and expert with linking 2 asterisk servers togther via IAX protocal
04:53.05firestrmits just seems so right to call it nuphone rather than nufone for some reason..
04:53.08dr123expert being anyone that has done it before
04:53.13outtoluncso ONCE again, are you sure you emailed the 'right' nufone.net (support@) ?
04:53.24Juggiedr123, its not hard
04:53.26firestrmouttolunc, yes..
04:53.48firestrmdr123, its easy after youve done it once.. nightmare the first time..
04:53.55outtoluncwell i'm been listening to you for days.. say 'nuphone' so i just HAD to ask <G>
04:54.13dr123can you show me i have my configs setup and i the CLI says it is trying to connect but then it says No one is availbe to asnwer but the extension is created correctly
04:54.25*** join/#asterisk Jabroni (~Hercules@red-corp-200.76.249.142.telnor.net)
04:54.27firestrmdr123, nat?
04:54.38Jabroniany way to restore a sipura3000 to factory defaults?
04:54.54firestrmJabroni, yes its on the voxilla faq
04:54.56outtoluncdr123, simply, do you get 'registration' notices?
04:54.57cursornuphone.com  <--- wrong
04:55.07dr123well there will be nat between them but not right now that is why i want to get the IAX protcal to work
04:55.14Jabronioh ok.. i readed the sipura page an dnothing came on
04:55.18Jabronilemme check on voxilla
04:55.19dr123yeah i get registration notices
04:55.29dr123-- Executing Dial("SIP/1100-adf9", "IAX2/franz:franz@serverB/9999") in new stack
04:55.30dr123-- Called franz:franz@serverB/9999
04:55.36cursorPerhaps JerJer should round up all of these mis-spellings and alias them all to the same place
04:55.38outtoluncif the registration (and you are attempting so) isn't happening then attempting to 'dial' isn't gonna work EITHER
04:55.40dr123then an error after that that no extension could be found
04:55.54firestrmcursor, i think so..
04:56.09outtoluncah
04:56.25outtoluncsending the dial across asterisk boxes
04:56.35outtoluncthe register is to the local box
04:56.38dr123only 1 CLI shows anything the other sets there
04:56.49dr123that register is to the other box
04:56.52outtolunctry registering direct to the other asterisk box, see if that works
04:57.03dr123i did in iax.conf
04:57.12firestrmcursor, an automated system for processing credit would be a big improvement too.. I wouldnt have to sit here waiting for the day i can tell D3 to stickit..
04:57.21*** part/#asterisk dr123 (~temp@12-202-51-38.client.insightBB.com)
04:57.25outtoluncthen look at your dialplan, a context is conflicting
04:57.35*** join/#asterisk dr123 (~temp@12-202-51-38.client.insightBB.com)
04:57.37dr123and random exit
04:57.42outtoluncbetween both asterisk boxes
04:57.42dr123and im back
04:57.49cursorprocessing credit or credit cards?
04:58.20firestrmcursor, either would be fine.. i have no problem with paypal, its just the several days delay that bugs me..
04:58.26hardwireaww sweet
04:58.27hardwireok
04:58.29hardwirehmm
04:58.35hardwireiax2 trunking + jitter buffer == nono
04:58.36hardwire:(
04:58.41hardwirethats no bueno
04:59.20*** join/#asterisk shaonss (~shaon@61.68.14.162)
04:59.39firestrmcursor, im sure jerjer is busy doing what he is best at.. but someone really needs to help him with a decent ecommerce site..
04:59.54cursorI think he's working on a new website
04:59.58cursorI seem to remember seeing it once
05:00.25shaonsshello chanell i am using fwd with asterisk but my friend using sip how can i do codec translation ?
05:00.34firestrmcursor, ive heard many good things about the service, but he does have an unusually large number of detractors when it comes to payments
05:01.04cursorI've not had any payment trouble
05:01.20Qwellthey accepted credit cards at one point in time
05:01.27cursorThen again, I have a healthy balance, for what I use
05:02.08firestrmcursor, and so will i once it gets credited :) its just the getting started thing that is frustrating..
05:02.25*** join/#asterisk FuriousGeorge (~brian@ool-43516aa2.dyn.optonline.net)
05:02.27outtolunci'm not here to fight for nufone, but they do have a statement stating that they are in transition
05:02.34FuriousGeorgehi all
05:02.36outtoluncor so they did
05:03.12cursorThe new website looks nice
05:03.19firestrmouttolunc, yes i did see that.. im not at all aganst them, im just chomping at the bit to get going with them. I REALLY! want to get rid of D3
05:03.21*** join/#asterisk scardinal (~supreme@port816.ds1-suoe.adsl.cybercity.dk)
05:03.33cursorbut uses a cacert SSL certificate, so nobody will be able to use it without jumping through hoops
05:04.05cursorCAcert is a noble idea, but it's not mature yet
05:04.11FuriousGeorgei was all psyched to see on voip-info there was a codebounty for a skype module, but then i read the comments and it looks impossible
05:04.17firestrmcursor, i dont mind the SSL cert hoops much, its not that hard..
05:04.22FuriousGeorgei was gonna contribute too
05:05.07FuriousGeorgecursor: you should be, its a way to call 30 million people free
05:05.30FuriousGeorgehow many people in FWD?
05:05.38cursorI don't know any of those 30 million people
05:05.54cursorand they can get a standard protocol if they want to talk to me :-)
05:05.56firestrmcursor, skype may be less than disireable, but we have to face it, it has a big market share.. better to absorb it than try to compete against it..
05:05.58cursorThere's a "Money Programme" special on VoIP next Friday-week on BBC2 (UK)
05:06.13FuriousGeorgebut you know people who know people, and some of those people know people who use asterisk, and in the end, everyone, including the knuckleheads at skype wins
05:06.16cursorabsorbing it just gives it credibility
05:06.36FuriousGeorgeunfortunately, its not gonna disappear
05:06.45cursorWe'll see :-)
05:06.49firestrmi agree with FuriousGeorge
05:07.08cursor(most) Skype users haven't played with the PSTN connectivity yet
05:07.09firestrmbetter to grasp reality and adapt than piss into the wind..
05:07.36cursorthe lack of competition for PSTN/Skype will probably drive people to SIP (or to drink)
05:07.43FuriousGeorgetoo many people dont want to play with the pstn at all
05:07.45firestrmcursor, and pstn is where skype is weak at.. if asterisk can give a gateway.. more the better for *
05:08.19cursorHow would you create a Skype address to offer seamless PSTN access
05:08.27cursorYou'd have to do it via DISA and a calling card
05:08.31cursoror similar
05:08.32FuriousGeorgei find it hard to believe with all the hacking that goes on there isnt some way to slap this together
05:08.47cursorlack of interest :-)
05:08.54FuriousGeorgecursor:  i actually heard they plan to roll out PSTN numbers
05:09.13FuriousGeorgeDID is that called, im new to this
05:09.15cursorthey plan to control access to the PSTN numbers
05:09.25cursorDDI in the UK
05:09.30cursorDID in North America
05:09.31mmlj4anyone use digitnetworks.com? are they reliable?
05:09.32firestrmgood luck buying skypein/out credit.. thats their weakest point..
05:09.45FuriousGeorgei think if you check their faq they say something about that
05:10.09firestrmFuriousGeorge, i did check thir faq, its all BS
05:10.12FuriousGeorgewell, they say something about "getting calls from regular telephones"
05:10.12cursorGood luck using a Cisco 7960 to talk over the Skype network :-)
05:10.46cursorI'll wait and see what they come up with
05:10.46FuriousGeorgefirestrm: dont get me wrong, im not endorsing it, their strategy makes no sense to me, and kinda ticks me off
05:11.19*** join/#asterisk tiko_007 (~tiko_007@218.108.170.187)
05:11.23cursorI'm sure FWD or someone similar will create a free SIP gateway if it's feasible
05:11.30firestrmFuriousGeorge, its utterly retarded, the first thing they should have done is to fire there credit card clearing company.
05:11.36cursorand then PSTN providers could run off the back of that
05:11.53FuriousGeorgefirestrm: actually, we do use it at work, where i havent implemented * yet
05:11.58FuriousGeorgeso i know what u mean
05:12.39firestrmwell.. got ta run.. sleep time for me :) gnite..
05:12.42FuriousGeorgeand the sound quality is not even that great, and its way less reliable, in my experience
05:12.44FuriousGeorgegnight
05:12.46cursornight
05:12.51cursor6:12am here :-)
05:12.58cursorSleep is for the weak
05:13.03*** join/#asterisk packetman (~324@d141-12-203.home.cgocable.net)
05:13.16firestrmcursor, not when you wife is beconing you to bed :)
05:13.18packetmanAnyone knwo how to restrick a sip extention to certain area codes?
05:13.21cursor:-)
05:13.55FuriousGeorgebottom line, if that code bounty had 6 or more digits behind it, there would be a skype module for * by the time i wake up tomarrow
05:13.55cursor.000001
05:13.55Silik0ndamn it
05:13.55FuriousGeorgepacketman: in your dialplan
05:13.58Silik0ni hate it when I write a agi and can remember where I f'n saved it
05:14.14cursorI prefer it when I can remember things
05:14.22cursor:-)
05:14.22Silik0nyeah me too
05:14.24Qwellexcept...skype is proprietary...wouldn't it be a DMCA voilation to release it in the US?  heh
05:14.47FuriousGeorgepacketman: create a context for long distance calling
05:14.47Qwellviolation*
05:14.47Silik0nthe really f'd up part of it is i finnished writting it about 15 minutes ago
05:14.57cursorThere's no DMCA in the UK
05:15.08Qwellcursor: Thats why I specified US
05:15.12cursoryes
05:15.22cursorI was just making you all jealous :-)
05:15.27Qwell:p
05:15.34QwellI'm moving out of the US soon anyways
05:15.41cursorUK <-- land of the free
05:15.47Qwellironic
05:15.48tiko_007will,who have the source code of chan_dialogic.c
05:15.48cursorhaha
05:15.58Silik0nEE.UU. land of the suposedly free
05:16.08cursorEuuuwww
05:16.15Qwellwe got all pissy, because we weren't free...and we left...now we suck
05:16.17cursorWe have a moat to keep the Europeans out
05:16.54*** join/#asterisk jonas (jonas@jonas.probe-networks.host.freenode) [NETSPLIT VICTIM]
05:17.47packetman<FuriousGeorge> Where in the dial plan would I add it and what is the format if you know?
05:18.25*** join/#asterisk PCadach (~paul@www.east.telecom.kz)
05:18.27tiko_007hi ,guys who can send me chan_dialgic.c ,i wanna add other hardware support to asterisk
05:18.54FanPFcan develop module on Switchvox?
05:18.59FanPFsuch as billing system
05:19.43FuriousGeorgepacketman: to be honest, i havent done it yet, but i will soon.  i imagine i would simply specify a priority for local area codes and exchanges to me to be dialed via zap
05:20.04FuriousGeorgeand everything else to go on sip
05:20.22FuriousGeorgeif you got the right sip provider, calls to toll frees in US and UK are free
05:20.42packetmanHmm ok thanks for the help Anyone else know how to specifically restrict a certain sip extention to certain area codes?
05:20.57Qwellpacketman: Give them their own context
05:21.06Qwellput it in the dialplan logic
05:21.27packetmanIm using FWDout.net and want to restrict a friend that I've giving a SIP extention too from dialing out area codes that I do not provide so It does not take up my credits
05:21.29Qwellor write an agi I guess...never done that though
05:21.55packetman<Qwell> Im not to sure of the logic format. Im kinda new at this
05:22.02Qwellpacketman: exten => _555NXXXXXX,1,Dial()
05:22.04Qwellpacketman: exten => _556NXXXXXX,1,Dial()
05:22.07cursorgive the user his own context
05:22.17cursorput specific "exten" directives in that context
05:22.34cursoror "include" other contexts, as appropriate
05:23.28FuriousGeorgecant you just use exten => _973589XXX,1,dial(zap)
05:23.38*** join/#asterisk jonas (jonas@jonas.probe-networks.host.freenode) [NETSPLIT VICTIM]
05:23.49FuriousGeorgedo another for all other local exchanges
05:23.58tiko_007chan_dialogic.c where can i get it
05:24.07FuriousGeorgeand on the same priority have the last entry be the catchall to use sip
05:24.09Qwell~google chan_dialogic.c
05:24.48packetmanHmm
05:24.52packetmanI see
05:24.56packetmanI think I've got it
05:25.52outtoluncchan_dialogic is a payfor thing, i think it's $15/per channel
05:27.04remmofook that
05:27.16outtoluncnotes: it also requires 'seting up you box' for the dialogic drivers.. which used to mean rh 7.2 <G>
05:30.37tiko_007i can find chan_dialogic.c  from  google search!
05:30.51QwellSo whats the problem?
05:33.23tiko_007i only wanna to know what does  the chan_dialogic.so do!
05:36.00outtoluncit simply allows a dialogic channel to be 'seen' as a zap
05:36.08outtoluncthat's all
05:37.31dr123wiat here
05:37.49dr123May 11 01:35:52 NOTICE[1603]: Rejected connect attempt from 192.168.1.102
05:37.50dr123May 11 01:36:32 NOTICE[1603]: Registration of 'franz' rejected: Registration Refused
05:37.50dr123May 11 01:36:32 NOTICE[1603]: No registration for peer 'barton' (from 192.168.1.102)
05:37.54dr123May 11 01:35:52 NOTICE[1603]: Rejected connect attempt from 192.168.1.102
05:37.54dr123May 11 01:36:32 NOTICE[1603]: Registration of 'franz' rejected: Registration Refused
05:37.54dr123May 11 01:36:32 NOTICE[1603]: No registration for peer 'barton' (from 192.168.1.102)
05:37.56*** join/#asterisk wols (klingens@p549DFED2.dip.t-dialin.net)
05:37.57dr123May 11 01:35:52 NOTICE[1603]: Rejected connect attempt from 192.168.1.102
05:37.57dr123May 11 01:36:32 NOTICE[1603]: Registration of 'franz' rejected: Registration Refused
05:37.58dr123May 11 01:36:32 NOTICE[1603]: No registration for peer 'barton' (from 192.168.1.102)
05:38.06dr123wow didnt reliaze i pasted that like 10 times
05:38.13dr123i was scrolled up in irc
05:39.05TheEmperoranyone have experience using video and asterisk?
05:43.16tiko_007if i wanna use a card of myself ,what should i do ?
05:46.52kb1_kanobetiko_007: you mean you have a dialogic card that you'd like to try to use with Asterisk?
05:49.28tiko_007um,no,my card is not a digium's and not a dialogic's too!
05:50.08cursorI don't have any telephony cards, so I'm no help at all.
05:50.51*** join/#asterisk JonR800 (jr@pcp05013027pcs.plyntv01.mi.comcast.net)
05:51.24tiko_007if i use dialogic card ,get me some suggestions
05:51.57outtolunctiko, if it's not either a digium nor a dialogic, then you were just wanting the code to offer your OWN hardware?
05:52.16cursoris there any chan_dialogic info on the Wiki?
05:52.31outtoluncif so, i'd suggest contacting digium directly so you can work something out
05:52.45outtolunccursor no, it's under NDA
05:53.22cursorOpen source and NDAs don't mix
05:53.58*** join/#asterisk Inv_arp (junya@adsl-8-232-176.mia.bellsouth.net)
05:54.07outtoluncwell since digium had to sign something for them to get the driver done with intel/dialogics help, so shall it's contents
05:54.30cursorI can't find a chan_dialogic.c, so I'm probably right about the Open Source part :-)
05:54.47outtoluncit's NOT open source, it's a payfor addin
05:54.53cursorugh
05:55.07outtoluncat (last i heard) $15/per channel
05:55.10*** join/#asterisk lilo (lilo@levin-pdpc.staff.freenode)
05:55.19cursorpay for the card and then pay for a closed source driver - not good
05:55.25tiko_007i only wanna refer the chan_dialogic.c for porting  my driver for asterisk!
05:55.43outtoluncwhich means if you get a dual t1 w 48 station dialogic card that's 96 lics
05:56.25outtolunctiko, contact digium directly, they will 'work something out with you'
05:56.51outtoluncotherwise, you are asking 'someone' to violate an NDA
05:57.02cursorThere are lots of other "drivers" to study - if you want to create one for your own hardware
05:57.25outtoluncexactly.. look at the vbp or is that vpb
05:57.42cursorbps
05:57.44cursor:-)
05:58.00outtoluncchan_vpb.c
05:58.25tiko_007outtolunc: really? can you give me one ? thanks
05:58.40outtolunctiko it's in /usr/src/asterisk/channels
05:59.34cursorMine is in /src/asterisk-v1-0/channels :-)
05:59.48outtoluncall you stable mongers <G>
06:00.19cursorI also have /src/asterisk-cvs-head
06:00.29cursorand a symlink from /src/asterisk to the v1-0 dir
06:01.03cursorI used to use CVS HEAD but switched to stable after a while
06:01.04outtoluncnot me, i run cvs-head... till it works.. then use it till i want something new, then repeat <G>
06:01.30cursorThere's nothing in HEAD I really want
06:01.41outtoluncthen you stay in stable <G>
06:01.43cursorunless the new jitterbuffer actually works
06:01.50cursorand PLC etc.
06:02.01cursorand I'll probably still wait for v1-1 for that :-)
06:02.08tiko_007thanks  ,i got it !
06:02.25outtoluncumm i think 2.0 will be coming out within a few months <G>
06:02.38cursorugh
06:02.45cursorWhy the major version jump
06:03.15cursorThere's nothing too new in there, as far as I can see
06:03.19outtoluncbecause there are too many compaining that the 'features they want' are in head, and they are too chicken shit to run head <G>
06:03.25tiko_007what is the vpb card?
06:03.25cursor:-)
06:03.57outtolunc* VoiceTronix Interface driver
06:04.15outtoluncgoogle 'voicetronix'
06:04.16cursorI don't write code for Asterisk any longer, so I'll stick with the stable branch :-)
06:04.32*** join/#asterisk clive- (~pirch@rndf-146-52-213.telkomadsl.co.za)
06:04.33outtolunck
06:05.21cursorI updated a couple of days ago
06:05.21cursorAsterisk CVS-v1-0/2005-05-08/05:36:16/cursor-5, Copyright (c) 1999-2005 Digium and others.
06:05.42cursor3 days ago
06:05.49outtoluncCVS-HEAD-05/10/05-10:16:33
06:06.16outtolunc(PST) <G>
06:06.24cursorMine is in GMT
06:06.28*** part/#asterisk eye69 (magnus@upcore.net)
06:06.37cursorMy Makefile forces the version to GMT too
06:06.51cursorUTC
06:07.08outtoluncgood for you <G>
06:07.11cursor:-)
06:07.31outtoluncdoing -8 in my head is a pain <G>
06:07.38cursorotherwise the date/time is useless to quote
06:07.41Qwell-7
06:07.45QwellYou're on pdt :p
06:08.07cursorBritish Summer Time
06:08.12outtolunchaha
06:08.12cursorWe invented time
06:08.20outtolunci've never heard that before
06:08.24cursorWhich is why we have GMT/UTC :-)
06:08.36cursorYou all owe us patent royalties :-)
06:09.25outtoluncthat's files foot, more to the left <G>
06:10.31cursor*shake*
06:10.53outtolunchaha, when i emptied my pockets before climbing in bed, i had $.42 in change
06:11.03cursorhaha
06:11.32outtoluncwhich went in the '5 gal water jug' we use for 'spare change'
06:11.45opus_anyone here use gnomemeeting?
06:11.58cursorno - none of us do
06:12.10outtoluncnot i
06:12.15TheEmperorany got experience doing video with asterisk
06:12.19TheEmperorgot a client looking for this...
06:12.44cursorI'll be using MythPhone for video - when I find someone else who has a videophone
06:13.15cursorPah!  Only $1 million?
06:13.22cursorI wouldn't get out of bed for that
06:13.44outtoluncwhy isn't anyone contacting the videolan guys?
06:13.58cursorWhy are they not contacting us?
06:14.01outtolunci'm sure they could help pump on out
06:14.20outtoluncegos? <G>
06:14.25cursor:-)
06:14.27outtolunchehe
06:15.04ShadowMaster1what is the difference between Asterisk and Safe_Asterisk?
06:15.04cursorI use MythTV, so have no use for VideoLAN
06:15.20outtoluncmythtv multicast nowdays?
06:15.24cursorsafe_asterisk will restart Asterisk if it dies
06:15.27cursoror something like that
06:15.29cursorI don't use it
06:15.33cursorAsterisk doesn't die
06:15.43cursorNot for me :-)
06:16.12*** join/#asterisk linagee (~linagee@netblock-66-245-229-130.dslextreme.com)
06:16.33ShadowMaster1ok, let me ask my question another way..  I am trying to get Asterisk to load as part of the init.d process, but I want it to load with the color option enabled.  Any suggestions on how to do that?
06:16.45linageeinteresting. i just did a voip phonecall and it took 2.9 kilobytes/sec. that's all! (but i've got DSL so the latency is small.
06:16.45linagee)
06:17.24outtolunchow about using screen
06:17.44ShadowMaster1screen?
06:17.45outtoluncthen just attach to it
06:17.46cursorI hate that colour option
06:18.07*** join/#asterisk ellvis (~ellvis@adsl-flat-basic-11.84-47-117.telecom.sk)
06:18.10ShadowMaster1the color option can make it easier to review all the data that Asterisk in -v mode spews..
06:18.11ellvishi people
06:18.19ShadowMaster1hey Ellvis
06:18.29cursorellvis llives !
06:18.40ellvissure
06:18.46cursorI knew the alliens hadn't taken you
06:18.47*** join/#asterisk RestLessGemini (~umairbari@202.142.189.86)
06:18.48ellviscursor: it was just about holidays
06:18.54outtolunc`/usr/bin/screen -L -d -m /usr/sbin/asterisk -vvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvgc`;
06:19.13wolsahttp://www.gnu.org/software/screen/ most distros come with it however
06:19.14outtoluncthen just ps wwwaux
06:19.19outtoluncsee the pid of it
06:19.30ellvisanyway, i am trying to set-up properly the g729 codec (i have buyed and installed the licences) and i am still failing, anyone with experience here?
06:19.32outtoluncand 'screen -r pid..host'
06:19.44outtoluncthen cntrl-a d to exit
06:20.16ShadowMaster1is screen really a better option then just added it to the start command some how?  Seems like more trouble.
06:20.37outtoluncyou can just fire up asterisk and use 'asterisk -r' to attach
06:20.49outtolunceither way works for me
06:21.11ShadowMaster1do the screen option, and still attch to it with the -r option?  Well that might work..
06:21.17outtoluncnods
06:21.35outtoluncand if you assign the 'screen one' to a tty <G> well you get the idea
06:26.22cursorBreakfast time
06:26.27cursorbrb...
06:28.03*** join/#asterisk gres (~serg@81.222.48.242)
06:29.20shaonsshello please help
06:30.19shaonssi am using asterisk iax with FWD but my friend using ATA186 but how can i make asterisk to translate codec?
06:32.16ellvisshaonss: which codec you need to translate?
06:32.46shaonssg729 or g723
06:33.35shaonssi have bought g729 from degium and registres
06:35.05shaonsselvis: can i do canreinvite=no in iax.conf?
06:38.03*** join/#asterisk Sato1 (~rauleli@sato1.wizardteam.com)
06:38.12Sato1hi
06:40.07kb1_kanobehello.
06:40.15*** join/#asterisk RestLessGemini (~umairbari@202.142.189.86)
06:40.38Newbie___Sato1: hi
06:40.41opus_hello!
06:40.44opus_where are you at
06:40.51opus_<--- portland oregon
06:40.57Sato1me?
06:41.00opus_yeah!
06:41.06Sato1Ciudad Juarez, Chihuahua, Mexico
06:41.16opus_where is that
06:41.24Sato1border with El Paso, TX
06:41.27opus_oh yeah
06:41.48ellvisshaonss: i am solving the g729 codec troubles by myself now...
06:42.26opus_sato1 - the bridge looks crazy, but i met some really nice people there. i wear a belt i bought from there all the time
06:42.42opus_i took a all day taxi ride in there
06:42.45shaonssnow to connect asterisk fwd behinf nat?
06:43.06opus_brought back some tequella
06:43.18Sato1hehehe
06:43.21opus_shaonss -- should be trivial.. whats your problem?
06:43.28*** join/#asterisk Inv_arp (junya@adsl-3-244-124.mia.bellsouth.net)
06:43.41Sato1this city is nice, but i miss my city, Monterrey, Nuevo Leon, Mexico
06:44.11Sato1shaonss, using iax2 or using sip protocol?
06:44.50opus_sato1 -- yeah nice area
06:45.03opus_fuck i have like 40 windows open god damnit
06:45.22Sato1opus_, did you eat burritos? (looks like traditional kind of food for this city, hehehe)
06:45.27shaonssopus_: i am using asterisk connected FWD with iax2 my friend using Ata 186 using fwd aswell i can receive his call but the codec problem
06:45.36Sato1if you didnt eat burritos, then you didnt really came to Juarez, lol
06:45.45opus_hehe, maybe i should go back
06:46.22shaonsssato1:iax
06:46.23opus_dude, can you get wifi from el paso ? hehe
06:46.42opus_i'll ship you down an antenna :)
06:46.42Sato1opus_, we already our own MAN wifi
06:46.43shaonsssato1:iax2
06:47.06opus_but, like, you could aim an antenna to USA and back to MX
06:47.07opus_:)
06:47.14Sato1shaonss, using iax2, it wont be a problem connecting to FWD, unless you got restrictions in your NAT
06:47.45opus_shaonss - did you run asterisk 'asterisk -vvvvvgc -d' and determine that it was a codec problem? what were the symptoms?
06:47.54kb1_kanobeagentcallbacklogin() - anyone using it to do portable numbers?
06:48.09Sato1opus_ we are connected using an USA ISP, then jumping the signal to mountain in Juarez, and then redistributing that to specific places here (one of them, my place)
06:48.19opus_whoah
06:48.24shaonsssalto1: i want to translate codec with my friend he is using g729 but asterisk receice ulaw
06:48.44kb1_kanobeheh - same thing happens up here. People squirt 802.11 into the states to get non-international calling.
06:48.52opus_do you have a website hosted I can go to?
06:48.54Sato1shaonss, asterisk does not have support for g729 unless you get a licence
06:48.58shaonssopus_:yes it shows codec used is ulaw
06:49.19opus_how do you implement it with a g729 licence?
06:49.19shaonsssato1:i bought licence from digium
06:49.20Sato1shaonss, it can do a passthru with those codecs only (g729 and g732)
06:49.33clive-kb1_kanobe hi, how is the trunking working with newjb going?
06:49.44*** join/#asterisk tuxinator_linuxM (~spabin@ip68-109-146-168.ph.ph.cox.net)
06:49.46kb1_kanobehi clive.
06:49.54clive-:)
06:49.57Sato1shaonss, then you have to go back to your iax.conf and specify that codec, btw, FWD does not manage g729, only ulaw and some other codec i dont remember
06:50.05shaonssi registred from module ......
06:50.11kb1_kanobeI'm in a holding pattern. Grolloj has advised there will be more patches shortly to address the no frames during dtmf issue.
06:50.40Sato1opus_, well, you can see one of my websites, but it is in spanish http://www.acuamundo.com
06:50.45shaonssSALTO1:i did then there is no aUDIO
06:50.58clive-kb1_kanobe I just tried cvs head, firt time I am using the newjb and PLC, and its beutiful,,my next big step is trunking, as my bandwidth is going way high
06:51.34Sato1shaonss, you are trying to link with FWD using g729? or with your friend using the ATA186 using g729?
06:51.49kb1_kanobeclive-: I would be wary of newjb/trunking in production at the moment. search mantis for bugs reported by grolloj for the patches that haven't made cvs yet.
06:51.50shaonsssalto1:friend
06:51.55*** join/#asterisk ClayReiche123 (~creiche@73-117.35-65.tampabay.res.rr.com)
06:51.56clive-so dtmf is the main bug still to be fixed?
06:52.19kb1_kanobeclive-: trunking works well for me - I need to keep my number of pps down and all my traffic is between four different servers, so that part works well.
06:52.29clive-yup, I have had my eyes on the mantis for a while, its been going on for quite a while
06:52.34kb1_kanobeclive-: however it does less than well with multihomed machines.
06:52.45shaonsssato1: i want to use sip behind nat is this possible?
06:52.51Sato1shaonss, if your asterisk is behind a nat, it will complicate things if you want some other trying to reach your asterisk, you may suggest your friend to join FWD as well, then you two can talk thru FWD
06:53.13clive-excuse my ignorance, what is "multihomed machines"?
06:53.22kb1_kanobeclive-: multiple physical nics.
06:53.28Sato1shaonss, it is possible, but you would need to redirect ports or use DMZ to give full access to your asterisk
06:53.29shaonsssato1:he is with fwd aswell
06:53.29opus_one machine, two different isp or network devices
06:53.54clive-ahh, ok , I am not multihomed then,:)
06:54.05kb1_kanobeclive-: as opposed to multi-addressed machines with more than one ip on the same interface or pseudo-multihomed with more than one VLAN on one interface :-)
06:54.07opus_used in the context of BGP routing
06:54.49kb1_kanobeThat said, since I disabled IAX native transfers most of the issues have vanished. :-)
06:54.54opus_<PROTECTED>
06:54.55opus_Because any one provider may have huge problems at any time. I won't name names here, and the Best Provider of Today could be the Shit Provider of Tomorrow.
06:54.59*** part/#asterisk outtolunc (~me@ppp-69-237-32-168.dsl.pltn13.pacbell.net)
06:54.59opus_hehe
06:55.03clive-I was actually thinking of having multiple routes for redundancy and cost savings, and wondering how well that would go down
06:55.30Sato1i need to learn about BGP actually
06:55.38kb1_kanobeI have a big, fat link that runs g726 and a little skinny link for gsm/g729/gwhatever.
06:56.08clive-lol...in south africa skinny links are basically the only options
06:56.13cursornot for cost - more for redundancy
06:56.19Silik0nBGP is useless
06:56.32Sato1useless?
06:56.38kb1_kanobecursor: you're routing everything out of one interface on * though, correct?
06:56.38opus_you need to have a class b to do BGP otherwise you need ceo money
06:56.44Silik0nyeah static route everything
06:56.45cursorcorrect
06:56.59opus_http://avi.freedman.net/fromnetaxs/multi.html
06:57.16clive-thanks for the info:)
06:57.17*** join/#asterisk CleanerX (~nix@nat-ph3-wh.rz.uni-karlsruhe.de)
06:57.25Silik0njust remember if you do BGP route prepending is your friend
06:57.36Sato1i thought bgp could be set for c clases as well
06:57.44Silik0nSato1 it can
06:57.53opus_you need a lot of money
06:58.01Sato1oh
06:58.02Silik0nand its needed for some space, but its frowned upon as the routing tables are bloated enuff as is
06:58.25Sato1see? i need to learn more about BGP, i just manage static routes with metrics for our MAN
06:58.35kb1_kanobefor internal purposes, bgp seems like a nuke to kill a mosquito in most cases, however it seems to be recommended over ospf for zebra/quagga etc.
06:59.05opus_more power!
06:59.06opus_:)
06:59.11Sato1i tried zebra 2 years ago, dont remember why we didnt acept it
06:59.18ClayReiche123can I get some help with some dial plan logic?
06:59.27Silik0nwhy not just get some real routers and run someting like EIGRP or {InSERT FAV ROUTING PROTO HERE}
06:59.27kb1_kanobeSato1: look into quagga - its a fork of zebra and it's gone a very long way.
07:00.00kb1_kanobeSilik0n: why not get a 'real' phone system too while we're at it... ;-)
07:00.18ClayReiche123...anyone willing?
07:00.18Silik0ni have a few actually
07:00.26Sato1the thing here is... if one wireless link goes down with one ISP, then have all trafic rerouted thru another different isp
07:00.28Silik0nClayReiche123 ask your question we might answer
07:00.55kb1_kanobeSato1: why not use both at the same time, all the time?
07:01.23Sato1kb1_kanobe, because some customers has ips from one isp, and other customers has ips from another isp
07:01.59Sato1actually, we are planning to stick with one isp soon
07:02.43Silik0nSato1: that would actually be a good fit for BGP
07:02.45*** join/#asterisk darby_t (~tom@host-ip226-209.crowley.pl)
07:03.12ClayReiche123I have 10 digit extensions in my dial plan, all DIDs from various area codes around the US. My customers dial 11 digits to call all US domestic locations. What is the best way to catch a local extension and still dial 11 digits?
07:03.47Sato1huh?
07:03.48Silik0nSato1: you should talk to your ISPs and see if you can get them to do a private BGP peering with you... that way you could avoid the high price of a real AS
07:04.17Silik0nClayReiche123: so if they dial 10 digits you want to send 1+10digits?
07:04.26Sato1Silik0n, we are thinking about those options first
07:04.43Silik0nor if they dial 1234 you want to dial 1775551234
07:04.44Sato1then we can deside to stay with 2 isps, or get rid of one
07:05.25ClayReiche123I did something like this exten => _1NXXNXXXXXX,1,Dial(local/${EXTEN:1}) then this exten => _NXXNXXXXXX,1,Dial(local/1${EXTEN}) but it writes 2 CDRs and I get some strange behavior when I use NoCDR....
07:06.00Silik0nSato1 if you have good sized IP ranges for both providers you can do private BGP with a private AS (like rfc1918 ip space) and have dynamic failover and quas least cost routing of packets... add some route prepend magic and you'll be doing good
07:06.30ClayReiche123SilikOn: I want them to dial 11 digits and send 10 local to see if the extension exists in my dial plan.
07:06.58opus_its all about IPV6
07:07.02ClayReiche123SilikOn:... and if it doesn't, put the 1 back on and send it out to my PSTN gateway.
07:07.04Silik0nyes it is
07:07.24Sato1interesting
07:07.36opus_when will asterisk support ipv6?? :)
07:07.49Sato1it should, soon
07:08.01opus_i'll help :)
07:08.08Silik0nwhy not just do something like _NXXNXXXXXX,n,dial(sip/ip/1${EXTEN}) and _1NXXNXXXXXX,n,dial(sip/ip/${EXTEN}) ?
07:08.57Silik0nif you have issues with routing loops you'll be better off doing some macros or agi to avoid routing loops for local numbers
07:08.58ClayReiche123Silik0n: How will that check my dial plan for local extensions?
07:09.07opus_IPv6 Enabled Applications
07:09.08opus_This page contains information on how to get IPv6 enabled applications. If you have ported an application to an IPv6 stack, please submit it.
07:09.14opus_http://www.ipv6.org/v6-apps.html
07:09.24Silik0nwhats up girl
07:09.29opus_VoIPv6 haha
07:10.02hardwirehehahhehheh
07:10.20hardwirebleh
07:10.29opus_i'm going to make stickers for defcon yay
07:11.05implicitSER + RTPProxy and Mediaproxy all support IPv6
07:11.46ClayReiche123Silik0n: am I making any sense to you?
07:12.12opus_well, like, even people forget about multicast. meetme would save 50% in transcoding if it used some algorithm from videolan/vlc
07:12.28opus_and if it were a standard
07:12.38implicitopus_, * wasn't written to be efficient
07:12.42opus_i need a good iax softclient, bleh
07:12.49implicitit was written to do a lot of stuff and have a lot of features
07:12.52opus_implicit - yeah, heh.
07:13.18opus_i saw the 'goto' statemetns, i know :)
07:13.19implicitit is not 'carrier-grade' by any means, stability, efficiency, or reliability
07:13.29opus_goto itsbroken;
07:13.29implicitbut it is a very nice toolkit in some situations
07:13.43implicitand good for unimportant PBXs
07:14.05implicitof course, for many things * is just overkill
07:14.08opus_yeah, but know you got a million mother fuckers using it for production servers
07:14.12kb1_kanobeClayReiche123: Basically, you want to be able to differentiate between calls out to the PSTN and calls that should be going to local users, right?
07:14.23opus_s/know/now
07:14.23impliciti've seen people using it just to route calls here and there
07:14.37implicitwhen they can just use something that deals with purely the signalling like SER
07:14.42ClayReiche123kb1_kanobe: yes
07:14.43implicitand not even touch the media streams
07:14.50opus_all in C?
07:15.00implicitand have call setup times 4 or 5 orders of magnitude faster
07:15.11implicitSER? yeah it's all in C
07:15.12opus_is it that much better codebase?
07:15.17kb1_kanobeClayReiche123: so, in the case of my systems we use a marker of sorts - all pstn calls _must_ begin with 9, regardless of the number of digits to follow.
07:15.35implicitin my opinion, hell yes, but it is for a different purpose although there is an overlap of some functionality
07:15.59opus_do people fork SER for properitary purposes?
07:16.15kb1_kanobeClayReiche123: but it works the same way as Silik0n pointed out. Somewhere the dialplan logic will differentiate between one type of call and another, by matching patterns.
07:16.43implicitopus_, maybe, but it is GPL so they can't distribute it without source
07:16.58kb1_kanobeClayReiche123: and once a pattern has been matched the logic will jump out somewhere else and do something (or even jump right to the extension that matched the pattern)
07:17.09implicitopus_, unless iptel relicenses it
07:17.17implicitopus_, anyway i'd better get back to work and sleep soon
07:17.22implicitopus_, talk to u later
07:17.28opus_how different are the codebases?
07:17.28opus_later
07:17.32implicitVERY
07:17.35implicitno threads in SER
07:17.40opus_wuh????
07:17.44implicitbut there is forking/ child processes
07:17.53opus_awesome
07:17.54implicitclean as hell, modular
07:17.59implicitand optimized to the max
07:18.03opus_:) you can use mosaics then
07:18.20implicityou don't even do checks in your code for sizeof(string)
07:18.32kb1_kanobeClayReiche123; there is much information at http://www.voip-info.org/wiki-Asterisk+config+extensions.conf
07:18.33clive-how about implementing iax in SER?>)....(just thought i'd add my 2c)
07:18.34implicitSER uses string type that includes length to only have to calculate it once
07:18.48opus_makes a lot of sense
07:19.02*** join/#asterisk cced (~dev2003@222.33.36.205)
07:19.41implicitclive-, people who think chan_sip == SIP are usually the ones who think IAX is so great, SIP is so powerful, extensible, and clean that I would never use IAX in place of it
07:20.05JamesDotComno shit
07:20.10opus_can asterisk "hand off" to SER?
07:20.13JamesDotComi hate that i've sold some iax accounts :(
07:20.15implicitopus_, sure
07:20.16JamesDotComi wanna stick to just SIP
07:20.21implicitJamesDotCom, yeah
07:20.27implicitalso, another huge issue
07:20.27opus_why not make a bridge, gateway, etc..
07:20.31kb1_kanobeimplicit: why would I chose sip over iax if I'm only doing trunk-style calls? I thought htat was the whole point of iax.
07:20.32clive-I know, just can't handle any more NAT issues, :)
07:20.32implicitpeople center their network around SER sometimes
07:20.38implicitoops
07:20.40implicit*
07:20.43implicitfor routing and everything
07:20.49implicitand put SER in front to just handle retransmits and so on
07:20.52implicitwhy do that?
07:20.58implicitwhy do routing call statefully even?
07:21.02*** join/#asterisk fidsap (~fidsap@213.199.2.66)
07:21.06implicituse asterisk when you need to deal with media
07:21.11implicituse SER when doing anything else
07:21.21implicitkb1_kanobe, SIP does not equal RTP
07:21.27opus_like, how would you do a dial plan in SER?
07:21.48clive-opus its all in a fiel called ser.cfg
07:21.52implicitkb1_kanobe, SIP is a signalling protocol alone, you could use some sort of trunking to transmit media with a proper implementation that did not use RTP
07:22.04*** part/#asterisk fidsap (~fidsap@213.199.2.66)
07:22.16Silik0nis it just a sip router/proxy that works in stateful or steless mode and it uses a scripting language to do the call routing... how you handle rtp is up to the endpoints or youur media proxy
07:22.21implicitthe signalling protocol does not place very specific restrictions on the media
07:22.29implicitSilik0n, not fully stateful
07:22.34implicitSilik0n, transaction stateful at most
07:22.44implicitSilik0n, but that's a good description
07:22.55kb1_kanobeso, for my case, with only 4 endpoints, iax seemed the far simpler soloution.
07:22.55*** join/#asterisk JunK-Y (~junky@modemcable174.107-81-70.mc.videotron.ca)
07:23.25implicitkb1_kanobe, exactly, * is easy but not for anything serious
07:23.42impliciti love * though
07:23.46implicitnot to say it is bad
07:23.54ccedwho can get tor2ee to run successfully?how to initialize eeprom 93CS56L for Tormenta 2 PCI Card?
07:24.01implicitit is good at what it is meant for, but people sometimes try to make it do too much
07:24.03implicitlike this!
07:24.05Silik0nwell stateful in the transaction arena... for CDRs but its not really staeful on the calls
07:24.08implicitTormenta 2 PCI card!
07:24.11implicitWHY??!?
07:24.12kb1_kanobeI'm just using * as a PRI over IP bridge, hence avoiding sip.
07:24.19ccedyes
07:24.22implicituse a nice SIP media gateway
07:24.27implicitdon't intermix all these things
07:24.35ccedthat card
07:24.37implicitspend a little more and get something with real DSPs
07:24.42implicitand good audio quality
07:24.49ccedi want to clone card
07:24.54ccedhi implicit
07:25.02implicithi cced
07:25.27ccedi want to clone card v400p
07:25.51ccedbut i am puzzle . ?how to initialize eeprom 93CS56L for Tormenta 2 PCI Card?
07:25.52impliciti mean, until VERY recently there was no RTP jitter buffer in * and now it is experimental only in CVS head
07:25.58kb1_kanobeimplicit: any suggestions for a product that can act as a sip media gateway to terminate one t1 for, say, under $1k?
07:26.13Silik0nkb1_kanobe: as5300
07:26.15implicitPLC is still iffy, RTP is restreamed all the time ...
07:26.19implicitSilik0n, under 1k?
07:26.22implicitSilik0n, i wish
07:26.24implicit:)
07:26.28Silik0nwell maybe not under 100K
07:26.31Silik0nerr 1K
07:26.36kb1_kanobeSilik0n: If I could afford (even from eBay) a 5300, I'd be running it. :-)
07:26.48implicitkb1_kanobe, under 3k yeah
07:26.51Silik0nbut you cant beat its bang/buck and ability to scale to 4Ts and handle faxing at the same time
07:27.00implicitcisco 1700 with a T1 trunk card and DSPs
07:27.03kb1_kanobecertainly.
07:27.05Sato1opus_ remember that spanish manual i was doing yesterday?
07:27.06clive-kb1_kanobe there aint much for under $1000....waiting for the new card from atacomm to be released
07:27.13implicitmight even be able to get it for ~2000 used with a good deal
07:27.36*** part/#asterisk JunK-Y (~junky@modemcable174.107-81-70.mc.videotron.ca)
07:27.39*** join/#asterisk my007ms (~ms@217.139.240.35)
07:27.41*** join/#asterisk JunK-Y (~junky@modemcable174.107-81-70.mc.videotron.ca)
07:27.48my007mshi all
07:28.03*** join/#asterisk rabelais (~blank@ca-stmnca-cuda4-gen2c1-171.vnnyca.adelphia.net)
07:28.19*** join/#asterisk BoRiS (boris@S01060040ca1e5b54.wp.shawcable.net)
07:28.21my007msany one her
07:28.24implicitwell, sorry about my SER & SIP rant :)
07:28.26Sato1hiy my007ms
07:28.35my007mshuy
07:28.41implicitbut a lot of people here should understand the technologies for themselves
07:28.42kb1_kanobeno worries - it always pays to listen to alternatives.
07:28.44my007msi am rining asterisk
07:28.51my007msbut i have probelm
07:28.53ccedwho has clone Tormenta 2 PCI Card:?
07:28.54implicitrather than just blindy following
07:29.01Sato1rining? running? ringing?
07:29.28my007mslet say that i have 3 sip and 3 iax  extantion
07:29.29kb1_kanobe* was the only thing we could defend at the time.
07:29.44my007msi need to make transfare call
07:29.46implicitread the RFCs, holy shit, i have had people arguing with me about how you *cant* do some types of 3rd party control in SIP when there are Examples of it in in RFCs (RFC 3725 in this case)
07:29.55clive-kb1-kanobe for IVR and call control, * is betterthan cisco imho
07:30.03implicitkb1_kanobe, i work on * and do custom coding on * as well
07:30.32impliciti've been busy lately, but I am also a bugmarshall on * project, I will be picking up some of my slack though soon as work starts to calm down
07:30.37kb1_kanobegood news - you know what you're talking about on both sides.
07:30.58my007mshow to do that.  it's work fine avery thing every body call any one
07:31.03clive-ever tried doing a custom ivr /calling card on a cisco....scary stuff
07:31.08my007msbut i need call transfare
07:31.10implicitfeel free to talk to me if you have any questions :)
07:31.19kb1_kanobeappreciated, thanks.
07:31.47my007mscan some one help
07:32.08Sato1my007ms, the transfer depends on the device you are using in some cases
07:32.25my007mslet say i used softphone
07:32.45my007msbut i ask how to let them transfer
07:32.59my007mswhat they have to do?
07:33.02Sato1see the options for the DIAL command, you can add a "tT" option so then your users can do transfers using the "#" key at the middle of the conversation
07:33.30my007msi add this
07:33.55my007msbut where is the conf that say # do that
07:34.19Sato1read the DIAL command in voip-info.org
07:34.39my007msi read it but for shame can not do it
07:34.42JunK-Ymy007ms: show application dial from ur CLI.
07:36.31my007msi have one more Q
07:37.13my007mswhat if i need to something like stats for every body
07:37.33Sato1explain
07:38.23my007mswhen he press 76 he leve msg say he is busy now
07:38.50my007msand when press 75 live msg say he no in his disk
07:38.57my007mssomething like that
07:39.39my007mscan i do something like that
07:39.48Sato1i think you will have to create those options in your dial plan
07:40.20Sato1those ones only works for digium devices as far as i know, other devices, i guess you will have to do it in your dialplan
07:40.20my007msyes but i ask myself this Q
07:40.58Sato1oh, well, so dont be so loud to think
07:41.18Sato1hehe
07:41.19my007mswhen i press 799 he will do something but this whill change as soon as i but the phone down :)
07:41.23my007msheheh
07:41.31my007ms:D
07:42.01kb1_kanobefsck it - I'm going home. g'night all. :-)
07:42.17Sato1nite kb1_kanobe
07:42.55my007msdo u have idea Sato1
07:43.13*** join/#asterisk Hali_303 (~Hali_303@a84-0-151-250.adsl-pool.axelero.hu)
07:43.14my007msi am sorry for my english any how
07:43.36Hali_303hi! is there a SIP softphone which doesnt require X? I mean a console app..
07:44.01my007msyes i have it wait i will see
07:44.02Sato1my007ms, spanish?
07:44.45*** join/#asterisk ellvis (~ellvis@adsl-flat-basic-11.84-47-117.telecom.sk)
07:44.47ellvisre
07:45.08my007msCornfed SIP User Agent
07:45.30*** join/#asterisk jonas (jonas@jonas.probe-networks.host.freenode)
07:45.50my007msbrb
07:46.33*** join/#asterisk chaoscon (~ph33r@chaoscon.user)
07:47.44*** part/#asterisk ClayReiche123 (~creiche@73-117.35-65.tampabay.res.rr.com)
07:53.34*** join/#asterisk hamb0 (~hamish@196-28-87-71.wdsl.co.za)
07:53.46ellvisis there a way how to get new firmware for cisco phones if i am not a re-seller?
07:59.07*** join/#asterisk Dibbler_ (~Dibbler@zidane.pi-net.net)
08:07.17dr123does anyone know how to connect 2 asterisk servers together via iax protocal
08:07.41dr123they both work independantly but they dont connect to each other... i dont know if it is a registration problem or what
08:08.12*** join/#asterisk tiko_007 (~tiko_007@218.108.183.22)
08:16.59UberbotAny Linux softphone recommendations?
08:19.23Inv_arpUberbot: linphone
08:19.23tzafrir_laptopUberbot, minisip is promising, but badly lacks dtmf dialing
08:19.33*** join/#asterisk eivindtr (~eivindtr@062016241059.customer.alfanett.no)
08:19.59Inv_arpkhone alse
08:20.08Inv_arpalso too
08:24.37shaonssis this  valid "canreinvite=no" in ixa.conf?
08:27.37Hali_303is there a console-based linux softphone?
08:27.42Hali_303(with source?!)
08:27.53rabelaisHali_303: linphone
08:27.55*** part/#asterisk JunK-Y (~junky@modemcable174.107-81-70.mc.videotron.ca)
08:32.47*** join/#asterisk shortguy (dirk@bender.futurized.nl)
08:37.18Hali_303rabelais, doesnt that require X/Gtk2?
08:37.34Hali_303rabelais, or does it have a console mode?
08:38.44*** join/#asterisk my007ms (~arkuser@217.139.240.35)
08:39.01my007mshi all
08:40.31my007msHi
08:41.21*** join/#asterisk PCadach (~paul@www.east.telecom.kz)
08:42.37rabelaisHali_303: linphonec is the console only mode
08:50.16newlshaonss: iax != sip
08:50.41my007mshello
08:50.59shaonssnewl:yes
08:51.25shaonssnewl:having problem with codec translation
08:52.04*** join/#asterisk A-Tuin|work (~A-Tuin@nat.office.legend.net.uk)
08:52.39shaonssnewl: how can i force asterisk to translate codec for sip calls?
08:54.19Hali_303rabelais, ok, thx!
08:55.46*** join/#asterisk Fabe (~spamhere@pD95B0BF7.dip0.t-ipconnect.de)
08:58.14Romiksomebody could point me to the good sample for the WaitExten
09:00.36*** join/#asterisk s9510278 (~bigdaddy2@203.210.152.35)
09:01.05shaonsssomebody please help!! asterisk behind NAT i want to connect FWD
09:03.25s9510278Please help! How to accurately bill transfered calls (billing starts when the other 2 parties connected)
09:04.00clive-s9510... use resetcdr
09:04.36s9510278clive... when to resetcdr?
09:05.02s9510278clive... where to call resetcdr in the dialplan?
09:05.17clive-in dialplan yes
09:06.26s9510278clive... what i'm confused is that what event would trigger the resetcdr command?
09:07.10s9510278(clive) i tried resetcdr in the h extension after the Dial command of the middle party, but somehow it didn't work
09:08.13clive-here is my dialplan..
09:08.14clive-[dial-out]
09:08.16clive-exten => _09.,1,ResetCDR
09:08.17clive-exten => _09.,2,Dial(.......)
09:08.18clive-exten => _09.,3,Congestion
09:09.29s9510278(clive) in that case, the called duration will be counted from the moment the 3rd party answer the 2nd party (not when the 1st party talks to the 3rd one)
09:10.00clive-oh, now I understand what you are trying to do....
09:10.41clive-not sure any easy way, but it will appear in your cdr.cvs file, you will have to rconcile from there then
09:11.51s9510278(clive) somehow the 2nd party's channel doesn't hangup when transfer completes (?)
09:12.12s9510278therefore CDR is not created at the moment the 2nd party got out
09:13.02s9510278any way to create a CDR at will?
09:15.06s9510278Some more help,pls!!! how can I set the call type (free call/charged call)?
09:15.52*** part/#asterisk tuxinator_linuxM (~spabin@ip68-109-146-168.ph.ph.cox.net)
09:16.27slePPs9510278: http://voip-info.org/tiki-index.php?page=Asterisk%20billing
09:16.28slePPgo read that
09:17.20slePPs9510278: you also probably want ResetCDR(w)
09:29.18*** join/#asterisk meppl (mephisto@p54AAE4C3.dip.t-dialin.net)
09:31.23*** join/#asterisk zeedo (~zeedo@www.bsrf.org.uk)
09:33.21Newbie___hi, i am trying to connect to a provider that supports H323, where can i find reference material about * to make * does that
09:34.57*** join/#asterisk rlg (~umairbari@202.142.189.86)
09:47.21TheEmperoranyone know how to make video conferencing work in asterisk?
09:49.12s9510278<slePP> thanks for the pointer, i've discussed ResetCDR with (clive) just b4 you
09:55.41*** join/#asterisk tafazzi (~Dario@eporroj0-1.customer.nettuno.it)
10:07.04*** join/#asterisk RoyK (~roy@179.80-203-29.nextgentel.com)
10:07.32RoyKhm. how long time does it usually take to get g.729 licenses?
10:07.48tzafrir_laptopAny RTFM on connecting asterisk to a PSTN line whose ring patterns are not known yet?
10:08.08*** join/#asterisk koehler (~koehler@c137036.adsl.hansenet.de)
10:08.14koehlerHello
10:08.55tzafrir_laptopI want to connect an * box via an fxo card to the local "telco"
10:10.22tzafrir_laptopSo far * has managed to "identify" the card, but when the phone ring, asterisk seems to "hang" the line
10:10.35RoyKFXO?
10:11.01RoyKperhaps playing with indications.conf will help.....
10:11.38tzafrir_laptopisn't it the tonezones in zaptel?
10:11.48RoyKer
10:11.49RoyKyes
10:11.51RoyKperhaps
10:14.47RoyKhm
10:15.03RoyKI need a low-profile te410p
10:15.14RoyKor sangoma...
10:15.38tzafrir_laptopIf you could get me a E1 adapter for the local "telco", that would be really grand. So far they only have TDM.
10:15.48tzafrir_laptop;-)
10:19.46RoyKwhere are you?
10:20.15RoyKare there really places that only use TDM today?
10:22.08*** join/#asterisk jskcr|lappy (~jskcr@jskcr.user)
10:22.17RoyKanyone here use app_realtime?
10:26.17*** part/#asterisk s9510278 (~bigdaddy2@203.210.152.35)
10:28.03*** join/#asterisk dtwilson (~dave@host217-36-121-129.in-addr.btopenworld.com)
10:32.28*** join/#asterisk cced (~dev2003@222.33.36.205)
10:40.30*** join/#asterisk newbien (~e@147.241.33.65.cfl.res.rr.com)
10:41.17dtwilsonany uk guys here fancy a consultancy contract? integrating asterisk as a proxy between pri and norstar mics/cics
10:45.26*** join/#asterisk gambolputty (~gambolput@cblmdm69-45-216-83.buckeye-express.com)
10:45.59*** join/#asterisk abatista (~Ariel@dsl-20-177.cofs.net)
10:48.59*** join/#asterisk Vercingetorix (~icechat5@69-173-140-135.agstme.adelphia.net)
10:53.07tzafrir_laptopprobably a defective card. Lucily I got two.
11:06.38RoyKdtwilson: try emailing asterisk-biz
11:07.21dtwilsonRoyK: ta will do
11:09.21*** join/#asterisk eper-werk (~eperdeme@telkom.gotadsl.co.uk)
11:22.22my007mshi all
11:23.13RoyK<PROTECTED>
11:26.46*** join/#asterisk onkeltimm (~chatzilla@dsl-082-082-127-148.arcor-ip.net)
11:41.42*** join/#asterisk MikeJ[Laptop] (~jayden@pcp02795302pcs.roylok01.mi.comcast.net)
11:51.58*** join/#asterisk onkeltimm (~chatzilla@dsl-082-082-127-148.arcor-ip.net)
11:54.08*** part/#asterisk queuetue (~Scott@h69-21-252-54.69-21.unk.tds.net)
11:54.17*** join/#asterisk makhtar (~ageller@mail.bulletinnews.com)
11:58.49koehlerchan_capi problem: asterisk do the segfault as soon as the bearer channel is sending the first voice frame. card is: gerdes dual E1 / s2m card
11:59.35koehlerplease help :)
12:00.14festr_how negotation in IAX2 work? CVS stable: BOX A (disallow=all,allow=g729,allow=ilbc), BOX B (disallow=all,allow=g729). Call A -> B, but A will negotiate codec ILBC so on B is recoding ilbc to g729, why not g729 on both?
12:03.36*** join/#asterisk TonyAlmeida (~tonyalmei@61.33.161.6)
12:06.14*** join/#asterisk Martohtar (Martohtar@82.196.218.80)
12:07.49RoyKka-ding
12:07.59JerJerfestr_:  don't run cvs -stable
12:08.15festr_JerJer: cvs HEAD?
12:08.19JerJermost certianly
12:08.23RoyKfestr_: don't listen to JerJer
12:08.38festr_i need stable version for production use
12:08.47RoyKexactly
12:08.55RoyKnow, JerJer will say "HEAD is more stable"
12:08.57JerJersure, don't listen to me - i only run a major asterisk based provider RUNNING FUCKING CVS -HEAD CODE
12:08.57RoyKor something
12:08.58festr_i'm watching commits to HEAD, (no thanks on production)
12:09.28RoyKJerJer: show uptime
12:09.43JerJeri update every few days
12:10.09JerJer*CLI> show uptime
12:10.09JerJerSystem uptime: 6 days, 22 hours, 13 minutes, 21 seconds
12:10.09JerJerLast reload: 9 hours, 15 minutes, 53 seconds
12:10.54JerJerbut if you want up time here:
12:10.54JerJer*CLI> show uptime
12:10.55JerJerSystem uptime: 2 weeks, 6 days, 17 hours, 38 minutes, 4 seconds
12:10.55JerJerLast reload: 9 hours, 17 minutes, 32 seconds
12:10.55festr_JerJer: any differences between stable and head in IAX codec negotation?
12:11.05JerJerthat is an application server running cvs -head as of 2 weeks ago
12:11.10JerJerso shut the fuck up
12:11.33JerJerfestr_:  there are MAJOR differences in MANY different parts of asterisk
12:11.38JerJercvs -head is far superior code
12:11.54RoyKit's not thorougly tested
12:12.01JerJerwho cares?
12:12.06JerJerit runs
12:12.11RoyKpeople who wants stable code cares
12:12.18festr_and do some bussines :)
12:12.20tzafrir_laptopJerJer, however it occasionally breaks. How can I tell that current HEAD is "stable" enough?
12:12.21RoyKwindows 95 works too
12:12.23RoyKand runs
12:12.34JerJerso 2 weeks up up time is not stable?
12:12.43RoyKJerJer: how many calls? 100?
12:12.44festr_JerJer: what traffic
12:12.51tzafrir_laptopwindows95 doesn't really work well. and nobody maintains it
12:13.03festr_stop this discussion plls
12:13.05tzafrir_laptopJerJer, this is an anecdotial example
12:13.13JerJerand let me remind you that last box processes 150 simultaneous calls during normal business hours
12:13.26RoyKJerJer: how many calls per 24 hours?
12:13.33festr_JerJer: sip? zaptels??
12:13.45JerJerRoyK:  do the math
12:13.54RoyKJerJer: just wc the cdr, please
12:14.12JerJerwe don't use the lame ass csv cdr, dumbass
12:14.20*** join/#asterisk cjk (~cjk@80.92.64.103)
12:14.37JerJerfestr_:  all of the above - plus iax as well
12:14.44festr_JerJer: switch => too?
12:14.48JerJerhell no
12:14.53festr_hell why
12:14.56JerJerabsofucking not
12:14.58JerJerbroken
12:15.09festr_switch is broken?
12:15.18JerJeryes
12:15.36festr_it is broken on cvs stable too
12:15.39festr_in cvs
12:15.53JerJerswitch has been broken almost since it has been implemented
12:16.09JerJerthe concept is flawed
12:16.19festr_concept?
12:16.21JerJerbut i commend Mark for outside of the box thinking
12:17.25JerJerRoyK:  just yesterday we processed over 900,000 total phone calls using Asterisk
12:17.27festr_i will stay with cvs stable for now, i dont like commits to HEAD (commits, that something broke)
12:17.37cjkhi, if i sell a box with asterisk (GPL). what do i have to give to the customer? what do i have to mention?
12:18.06JerJerRoyK: running cvs head code
12:18.13*** join/#asterisk CdtDelta (~CdtDelta@dsl081-225-161.chi1.dsl.speakeasy.net)
12:18.14JerJerRoyK:  so go back to your hole
12:19.25festr_so back to stable cvs 8-) and iax codec negotiations
12:19.33JerJerhell no
12:19.37JerJerit wouldn't work
12:20.04daorkcjk: get yourself a lawyer
12:20.13JerJerthe memory leaks would cause asterisk to crash every 20-30 minutes
12:20.16daorkcjk: and then ask hm
12:20.17daorkhim*
12:20.22daorkcjk: or her :)
12:20.29daorkcjk: dont ask IRC.
12:20.34festr_JerJer: what cvs stable?
12:20.47tzafrir_laptopcjk, there is an faq about it on http://gnu.org/philosophy/ somewhere
12:20.50cjkdaork: if you do not want to help, then shut up
12:20.50daorkcjk: you could ask GNU, or the fsf, they will likely have some pointers
12:20.55JerJerfestr_:  find a clue
12:20.58daorkcjk: i am helping
12:21.03cjktzafrir_laptop: thanks
12:21.08tzafrir_laptopThis is the FSF's interpertation of the license, and they tend to be over-strict, though.
12:21.10daorkcjk: i'm telling you not to get legal advice from IRC
12:21.24festr_JerJer: wtf
12:21.34daorkcjk: if you don't need to be told that, then cool, just ignore it.
12:21.43daorkcjk: if you do, then dont ignore it
12:22.10cjkjup
12:22.55tzafrir_laptop(disclaimer: IANAL, do consult one, etc.) Generally if you don't add your own code the rules are much less strict, because you are basically redistributing someone else's work.
12:24.08Drukenmorning everyone
12:24.34festr_afternoon
12:24.53*** join/#asterisk vpp (~noone@host-83-146-50-131.bulldogdsl.com)
12:24.56vpphi!
12:25.07JerJerhoe
12:25.26vppdoes anyone use a sangoma T1 card with PRI ?
12:27.02Drukenlots of people do
12:27.34JerJernot me
12:27.38TonyAlmeidaPlease help me for tutorial link for asterisk, I've just installed it.
12:28.06JerJerTonyAlmeida:  go read some more first, then come back when you are ready to ask informed questions
12:28.32JerJervpp: do yourself a favor and buy a Digium T-1 card - you will thank me later
12:28.44TonyAlmeidaJerJer : thank you, where can I find material to read?
12:28.59JerJergoogle.com punch in the word  asterisk
12:29.20JerJerwhen you've gone thru every result, then u can ask questions
12:29.23koehlerwill only digium stuff work properly with * ?
12:29.34JerJerkoehler:  it is the most supported
12:29.35TonyAlmeidagot it JerJer thanks
12:29.52newbienTonyAlmeida: best way to learn is hands on by getting an fwd account; read the fwd iax info page; edit asterisk .conf files; test and your up and running
12:30.08JerJerTonyAlmeida:  and never run asterisk@home
12:30.37koehleri'm asking because i have problems with a segfaulting * / chan_capi / E1 card from another manufactor
12:30.45JerJersee
12:30.50JerJernow who do you turn to?
12:31.07koehleri turning to fix it
12:31.22TonyAlmeidanewbien : thank you, but one question I have a few voip gateway which is ready to use with asterisk, but do i have to have some devices or cards on my PC on which asterisk is installed?
12:31.36*** join/#asterisk MikeJ[Laptop] (~ircatjerr@mi.origenfinancial.com)
12:31.36JerJerkoehler:  so then you are on your own - completely
12:31.46JerJerlord knows the E-1 manufacture won't help you
12:33.07koehlerusing only digium stuff will narrow all things
12:33.38JerJerwe do E-1s with Digium hardware
12:33.49TonyAlmeidaI wonder I can build up a small voice network with asterisk on my PC and two 1-port gateways without cards like digium products
12:33.53koehleri guess i could get helped from the maker of chan_capi
12:33.53newbienTonyAlmeida: softphone or hardphone => asterisk => voip provider
12:34.10TonyAlmeidanewbien : good news , thank you
12:34.14koehlerjerjer, fine for you :)
12:34.16JerJerwe've  got 15 or 16 E-1 systems  we manage
12:34.22JerJerall with digium hardware
12:34.55sylehow many boxes is that?
12:35.01JerJer15 or 16
12:35.16newbienTonyAlmeida: ~doc
12:35.34TonyAlmeidanewbien : what's that?
12:35.37koehlerhow many trunks for each digium card?
12:35.55JerJerkoehler:  do you even know what an E-1 is?
12:35.58newbienTonyAlmeida: trying to get the irc jbot to post the docs urls for ast*
12:36.11DrukenJerJer: why dun ya like the sangoma cards?
12:36.15koehlerjerjer, just another PRi term
12:36.38daorkkoehler: PRI runs over E1 (or T1)
12:36.40TonyAlmeidanewbien : ah is that a command for that
12:36.58JerJerDruken:  cuz they are junk
12:36.59newbienTonyAlmeida: no, will ask the chan
12:37.04koehlerdaork, already familar with this business, but thanks :)
12:37.17newbienwhats the command for the jbot to post the ast* docs urls?
12:37.29DrukenJerJer: what in your opinion, makes them junk...?
12:37.46TonyAlmeida~doc
12:37.52jbotsomebody said doc was The command is "~docs", moron!
12:38.00newbiendocs
12:38.04TonyAlmeidanewbien : have no idea, kinda newbie with irc
12:38.09TonyAlmeida~docs
12:38.10jbotDocumentation can be found at http://digium.com/index.php?menu=documentation or http://www.digium.com/handbook-draft.pdf or #asterisk-doc, or http://www.voip-info.org/wiki-Asterisk, or http://www.asteriskdocs.org
12:38.16JerJerDruken:  their architecture is based on 1980s technology
12:38.22TonyAlmeidanewbien : thanks!
12:38.52newbienTonyAlmeida: the tiki at voip-info.org is a good place to start, then the rest
12:39.33TonyAlmeidanewbien : yes indeed, I've already visited
12:39.49JerJerDruken: and they only are piling on to the Asterisk game now that it is very well established
12:39.58clive-Drunken, I have a digium card, but there are also many poeple who use asteris and prefer sangoma
12:40.15clive-not sure all the reasons
12:40.50newbienTonyAlmeida: the fwd info page for iax registry is a good place to start your setup, it worked for me and you learn how to edit the ast* .conf files to setup sip, iax, and dialplans; fast start
12:41.10Drukenclive-: i've had calls go out both, digium and sangoma, i don't notice a diffrence as a user...
12:41.33Drukenbut apparently the songoma is much less costly
12:42.36DrukenJerJer: so your mad at the company because they seen a market they could exploit and took advantage of it... hehehe i guess you never use microsoft products either :)
12:43.03daorkDruken: yeah, aren't businesses evil! ;)
12:43.11JerJermuch less costly?   ok sure
12:43.34JerJerwhat planet are you living on?
12:43.44*** join/#asterisk ellvis (~ellvis@adsl-flat-basic-11.84-47-117.telecom.sk)
12:43.47ellvisre
12:44.24Mochail asterisk user
12:45.19blitzragehail Moc
12:45.19DrukenJerJer: well, it all depends how you look at things, if you need 2 pri's, your stuck with either 2 singles (1000+) or you can get away with the 2 port sangoma, (700+)
12:45.38Drukenor you could spend 2000 and get the digium quad
12:45.54JerJerif you pay digium retail
12:46.05daorkright, i'm going to bed
12:46.12JerJerand a quad card makes sense - you will find a use for the extra spans later on
12:46.19Mocyep
12:46.54JerJerand last I looked sangomas single span card was over 700$
12:47.07daorkits $US500 ish
12:47.08daorkretail
12:47.17*** join/#asterisk Vercingetorix (~icechat5@69-173-140-135.agstme.adelphia.net)
12:47.35JerJerso they lowered their price point - its still 1980's technology on board
12:47.39ManxPowerJerJer: Who DOESN'T pay at least close to Digium retail when only buying one card?
12:47.57JerJeranyone that buys from an authorized digium reseller
12:48.05Drukennot all of us have 16-20 boxes
12:48.08JerJerwhich means 99% of the people outside of the us
12:48.51ManxPowerYou mean like voipsupply?
12:49.07Drukenahh, b2tech hehe
12:49.29Mocgota rush... again... bbl maybe
12:49.37JerJerno - like Cybergistics   (or however they spells it)
12:50.05ManxPowerAh yes, discounts of a whole $20 off retail.  I shall now have a profitable company.
12:50.24JerJerwhat do you expect for one off orders?
12:50.43*** join/#asterisk bjohnson (~bjohnson@jecinc.tor.istop.com)
12:50.46ManxPower<ManxPower> JerJer: Who DOESN'T pay at least close to Digium retail when only buying one card?
12:50.46ManxPower<JerJer> anyone that buys from an authorized digium reseller
12:50.47JerJerbuy a 100 four span cards and see what price digium would give you
12:51.01ManxPowerAh, I'm sure I'd get a good discount for 100 boards.
12:51.04JerJerdefine close
12:51.21ManxPowerJerJer: Within %15 of retail == close
12:51.28JerJerhah
12:51.36*** join/#asterisk Aze` (~aze@host229-162.pool80105.interbusiness.it)
12:51.55JerJerthat's funny
12:52.06JerJerso you want a 15% discount for one card?
12:52.11JerJerthat's gonna happen
12:53.46*** join/#asterisk Fabe (~spamhere@pD95B0BF7.dip0.t-ipconnect.de)
12:54.11*** join/#asterisk rvhi (~rv@66.175.65.89)
12:54.43ellvisi am trying to get g729 codec working, i buyed and installed licences, but i am stuck now. anyone can help me?
12:54.46DerylManxPower: he's got a point. you're nuts to expect 15% off retail on a single card (one-off) orders
12:54.55*** join/#asterisk Vercingetorix (~icechat5@69-173-140-135.agstme.adelphia.net)
12:56.12MikeJ[Laptop]Quick searc on the net, Digium TE405p quad card $1470, Sangoma A104 $1450, closer than I thought
12:56.33ManxPowerDeryl: Oh, I'm not expecting %15 off retail for a single digium card.  I'm just saying that I do not agree with the statement "<JerJer> anyone that buys from an authorized digium reseller" should expect good discounts.
12:56.58ManxPowerellvis: Contact Digium support
12:57.14MikeJ[Laptop]that was from www.voipsupply.com btw.. so the moral of the story is, they are about the same
12:57.45ellvisManxPower: i did, it wasn't much of use, i sent another email, waiting for an answer, but still trying if someone can kick em to some direction
12:57.48MikeJ[Laptop]cost wise... technology\quality is obviously a different discussion
12:57.58MikeJ[Laptop]ellvis, call them
12:58.06*** join/#asterisk GrahamC (hidden-use@213-131-100-29.onyx.net)
12:58.41ellvisMikeJ[Laptop]: i am in the slovakia, they're from teh states, i am nor alowed such long distance calls :(
12:59.09tzafrir_laptopellvis, isn't that what's voip's for?
12:59.14ellvisdamn typos, the and not
12:59.25ellvistzafrir_laptop: yeah, but i have to set it up at first
13:00.11tzafrir_laptopg729 is not the only codec. gsm, speex, ilbc will do. A soft phone that supports one of those will also do.
13:00.23ellvistzafrir_laptop: i know
13:00.53ellvistzafrir_laptop: isn't it obvious that i am the kind of lazy ass like "tell me the solution here/now" :)
13:01.38tzafrir_laptopellvis, but assuming you do want to get help from someone here (not me), you better detail the symptoms of your problem
13:01.53Drukenellvis: then ya might as well give up... cause linux people don't do the just gimmie the solution thing
13:02.12ellvisDruken: i know, it was just (probably bad) joke
13:02.18Drukenfor the right price i'm sure they would :)
13:02.23ManxPowerellvis: If you try to install the codec more than 3 times the license will be revoked and you'll have to call Digium anyway.
13:02.43ManxPowerSo call Digium and save yourself problems.
13:03.42tzafrir_laptopellvis, as for a quick solution: if you run 'rm -rf /' in the linux cmdline, all your problems with the asterisk installations will be gone
13:04.03Drukentee hee
13:04.04ellviswell, my problem is like this: i buyed and installed the licences. now if i do or receive the g729 call, it look just fine, except the HIGH traffic (like 800kBytes per minute, which is not good i think...) and i am always getting '0/0 encoders/decoders of 2 licensed channels are currently in use'
13:04.12ellvistzafrir_laptop: yeah, sure:)
13:04.36ellviswell, anyway, this is my last trying here, i don't wanna bother you too much and i am really not gonan do an enemies here...
13:04.49ManxPowerellvis: that's not a G729 problem.
13:05.09ManxPowerWe CAN help with "picking the wrong codec problem"
13:05.18ManxPowerellvis: Are you using SIP or IAX?
13:05.46ellvisManxPower: right now SIP, i tested both with the same results, now testing with only SIP
13:07.06ManxPowerellvis: in sip.conf do this: in [general] context=INVALID and allow=all  Then in each section where each device is defined (the [whatever] sections) put disallow=all allow=onlythecodecyouwant and context=thecontextyouwant
13:07.41ManxPowerellvis: the context=INVALID in [general] is so that calls from devices that don't match a section in sip.conf will fail.
13:09.10ellvisManxPower: thank you, i had it only in [general] section
13:09.40ellvisManxPower: i just need to be kicked sometimes, thank you, i apreciate it!
13:09.50ManxPowerellvis: one of the common problems that look like a codec problem is actually a username/password problem.  The call doesn't match a user/friend/peer and so uses the settings in [general]
13:11.13cjkdoes iax have a qualify option ?
13:11.21ManxPowercjk: yes
13:11.41ellvisManxPower: i'll take care
13:20.44*** join/#asterisk bkw_ (~bkw_@bkw.developer.and.friend.of.asterisk)
13:20.44*** mode/#asterisk [+o bkw_] by ChanServ
13:23.18*** join/#asterisk HeadachesAbound (HeadachesA@wsip-68-99-73-32.tu.ok.cox.net)
13:23.53HeadachesAboundHow much support is there in * for all the conf information to be read from a mysql database?
13:29.33*** join/#asterisk scardinal (~supreme@port816.ds1-suoe.adsl.cybercity.dk)
13:30.16sudhir492For some reason, all I get is blank screen with flash operator panel
13:30.43sudhir492I have finally reduced op_buttons.cfg to just 2 icons
13:30.58Sato1whats an Agent in the AgentLogin?
13:31.08Sato1its a queue name?
13:32.32ellvis15:05 < ellvis> well, my problem is like this: i buyed and installed the licences. now if i do or receive the g729 call, it
13:32.35ellvis<PROTECTED>
13:32.38ellvis<PROTECTED>
13:32.41ellvis15:05 < ellvis> tzafrir_laptop: yeah, sure:)
13:32.43ellvis15:06 < ellvis> well, anyway, this is my last trying here, i don't wanna bother you too much and i am really not gonan do an
13:32.46ellvis<PROTECTED>
13:32.49ellvis15:06 < ManxPower> ellvis: that's not a G729 problem.
13:32.51ellvis15:06 < ManxPower> We CAN help with "picking the wrong codec problem"
13:32.54ellvis15:06 < ManxPower> ellvis: Are you using SIP or IAX?
13:32.56ellvis15:07 < ellvis> ManxPower: right now SIP, i tested both with the same results, now testing with only SIP
13:32.59ellvis15:08 < ManxPower> ellvis: in sip.conf do this: in [general] context=INVALID and allow=all  Then in each section where each
13:33.02ellvis<PROTECTED>
13:33.05ellvis<PROTECTED>
13:33.08ellvis15:09 < ManxPower> ellvis: the context=INVALID in [general] is so that calls from devices that don't match a section in
13:33.11ellvisfuuuck, i am sorry!
13:33.13ellvisdamn terminal...
13:33.23*** part/#asterisk ellvis (~ellvis@adsl-flat-basic-11.84-47-117.telecom.sk)
13:33.24Sato1hehehe
13:34.12*** join/#asterisk JonR800 (jr@pcp05013027pcs.plyntv01.mi.comcast.net)
13:34.36bkw_*SMACK*
13:35.15*** join/#asterisk Hmmhesays (negative3k@66.173.103.108)
13:36.23Nuggetheh
13:36.42Sato1found it
13:39.56zoabrian
13:40.01tzangeris != not hte right expression for "not equal to" in $[] ??
13:40.03zoalooks like jeremy is offended by my email
13:40.09zoai didnt say it was his fault
13:40.12zoai just said it didnt work for me
13:40.24zoaand i did try (although not the recent versions)
13:40.49blitzragetzanger: it should be - do you have spaces around everything?
13:41.17bkw_zoa I did exactly what was in the readme
13:41.26bkw_it doesn't work for me... I think it has to do with newer GCC's
13:41.41bkw_because it would bitch about thread creation and segfault
13:42.01ManxPowerzoa: Everyone seems to be channeling their inner bitch recently (yes, including me)
13:42.08*** join/#asterisk iq (~iq@63-230-45-16.omah.qwest.net)
13:42.19HeadachesAboundhow well does realtime work?
13:42.37bkw_I haven't today yet
13:42.44Nuggetlet's all discuss our personal hostname choosing habits.  :)
13:42.56ManxPowerNugget: Mine are all very boring.
13:43.03JerJerHeadachesAbound:  you really like those headaches don't you?
13:43.05HeadachesAboundManx: I prefer to channel my outer bitch and let the inner bitch pull all the strings.
13:43.08bkw_Nugget, looney toons
13:43.17jskcr|lappyNugget: star trek ships, I have a list of over 100 kinds
13:43.19tzangerblitzrage:
13:43.20tzangerexten = s,1,GotoIf($[${ARG3} != ''],s,add_cxt
13:43.24bkw_acme daffy bugs
13:43.26bkw_marvin
13:43.35ManxPowertzanger: Ah!
13:43.44HeadachesAboundJerJer: I presently have a headache the size of Canada and well, i plan to put in a very short day today.
13:43.55ManxPowertzanger: Does this work?  exten = s,1,GotoIf($['${ARG3}' != ''],s,add_cxt
13:44.01ManxPowerdon't forget the priority too.
13:44.02JerJerthen deploying realtime will turn it into a never ending migrane
13:44.35tzangerJerJer: amen
13:44.42ManxPowertzanger: try using double quotes instead of single quotes as well.
13:44.48blitzragetzanger: that won't work :)
13:44.59tzangerManxPower: add_cxt *is* the priority
13:45.08ManxPowertzanger: Ah, OK.
13:45.39NuggetUpgrade your BSD asterisk server to CVS HEAD running realtime using mysql to track your h.323 devices.  Your head will explode.
13:45.42blitzragetzanger: try exten => s,1,GotoIf($[ ${ARG3} != '' ],s,add_cxt)
13:45.42HeadachesAboundi figured as much from reading the wiki. but what if i put in place before the new boxes goes live? still a migraine?  does it work or is it just there to look pretty?
13:45.49Godseyjust out of curiosity, why all to opposition to using mysql for realtime config?
13:46.03blitzrageI'm just opposed to realtime in general
13:46.12NuggetI'm just opposed to mysql in general
13:46.12tzangerblitzrage: the parsing of extensions.conf is hideously fucked
13:46.20JerJerbecause its implementation is absolutely horrid
13:46.21blitzragetzanger: I agree - did that work?
13:46.27blitzragetzanger: I can explain why it works
13:46.30blitzrageif it does ;)
13:46.35bkw_realtime needs some love
13:46.36GodseyI skirted the problem and use AGI
13:46.42bkw_like hard love..
13:46.46JerJercan anyone tell me what class 4/5 switch depends on a database to configure?
13:46.47bkw_pick it up and toss it out
13:46.54blitzragebkw_: industrial love? :)
13:46.55bkw_that kind of hard love
13:46.58Godseyso only the bits I really need pulled from db can
13:46.59HeadachesAboundnugget: using FC3 w/ CVS HEAD and only SIP / Zap devices.
13:47.00ManxPower<troll>Digium should switch to using ERLANG for dialplan parsing!</troll>
13:47.02tzangerblitzrage: because asterisk takes whitespace literally... it's fucked
13:47.09blitzragetzanger: yep :)
13:47.19bkw_well JerJer is right.. big ass telco switches don't have databases
13:47.25bkw_like for config stuffs
13:47.26tzangerI can't say Macro(somemacro, one, two, three) because it takes " one" as the arg, not "one"
13:47.28blitzragetzanger: so it is actually matching whether the whitespace is != whitespace :)
13:48.09tzangerno
13:48.12tzangerit's not matching at all, it's failing to parse
13:48.20blitzrageoh... well thats strange
13:48.45blitzrageGotoIf($[ ${ARG3} !=
13:48.49blitzrage"" ) ?
13:48.55ManxPowertzanger: This works for me: GotoIf($[X${RDNIS} != X]?7)
13:49.07blitzragewhat a sloppy work around :)
13:49.07tzangerManxPower: it's still fucked up.  :-)
13:49.16tzangerhahahahha
13:49.21tzangercvs log: "Add specific gcc version to shut bkw up"
13:49.35bkw_tzanger, thats still no fix
13:49.39bkw_the proper thing to do is FIX IT
13:49.40ManxPowertzanger: And my version works all the way back to .70
13:50.07JerJerbkw_:  then file a fucking bug report with some DEBUG
13:50.23*** join/#asterisk mutilator (~animenodv@65.111.201.79)
13:50.34JerJeri patently refuse to run fedora so gcc 3.2.2 is what i use
13:50.43bkw_JerJer, why?  Its just gonna sit there and rot away on the bug tracker.. get ignored.. and not commited just like the rest of the h.323 stuff people have commited.
13:50.53JerJerwhere the fuck have you been?
13:50.56tzangerJerJer: run slackware, gcc 3.3.4  :-)
13:51.11JerJertzanger:  i have H.323 running on slack 10.1
13:51.12bkw_oh are we bitter?
13:51.18*** join/#asterisk in-side (~Lowgitek@es-217-129-31-172.netvisao.pt)
13:51.20HeadachesAboundat what point does gcc and asterisk begin to conflict?
13:51.22in-sideHi
13:51.36JerJerbkw_:  05/03/2005 03:51 PM
13:51.37bkw_HeadachesAbound, I recommend 3.4.3
13:51.40tzangerManxPower: odd that that should work
13:51.41JerJerFix one-way audio issues with CCM and possibly other [broken] endpoints. Bug #4135
13:51.42in-sidedoes anybody here has asterisk working with ser?
13:51.47JerJer05/02/2005 03:38 PM
13:51.52JerJerFix dtmfmode, dtmfcodec capability, Faststart for users and peers. Bug #4112
13:52.02JerJer04/29/2005 12:41 AM
13:52.07JerJerRework astersk make process to be compatable with the Open H.323 build process. Bug #3981
13:52.11JerJeri could keep going
13:52.25JerJerin-side:  asterisk works wonderfully with SER
13:52.36zoajust in, RTPproxy is broken
13:52.37in-sideI get full problem on it (sorry for my english)
13:53.07bkw_JerJer, I still think more patches exist on the bug tracker ?
13:53.09in-sideI can't registred at ser dunno why
13:53.16in-sideãll my phones register ok
13:53.22JerJerbkw_:  lets see - one is awaiting a disclaimer
13:53.23RomikI have problem with incomming calls  when people dialing 20 they receive invalid extention, but when dialing 2222 they dial correctly...anybody can advice? http://pastebin.ca/11482
13:53.23ManxPowertzanger: not really.  It's the same way shell scripts do such tests.
13:53.28JerJeranother modifies channel.c
13:53.30in-sideand I can foward calls to asterisk
13:53.48bkw_ah
13:53.49ManxPowertzanger: For a long time you could not test for an empty variable unless you used the shell script hack way of doing it.
13:53.50JerJerand yes there is one that can be commited - which will go in when i'm not dealing with paying customers
13:53.53bkw_I know what the hold up is there
13:53.53bkw_haha
13:54.08in-sideis there any secret to ge tit interconnect or what?
13:54.16JerJerhe said tit
13:54.20bkw_haha
13:54.25in-side<PROTECTED>
13:54.28in-sideat ser
13:54.30bkw_you want a tit interconnect?
13:54.35tzangertit interconnect?
13:54.37in-sidebut it simples don't foward the call
13:54.40tzangerI'll get the aligator clips
13:54.42ManxPowerin-side: try 5060
13:54.49in-sidemy * is at 5080
13:54.52bkw_nipple connect services from bellsouth!
13:55.01in-sidehave both running in same box
13:55.03in-sidefor now
13:55.16in-sideI tryed with uac at ser
13:55.37in-sideno gain ... I can't get ser registed at asterisk and asterisk registed in ser... :S
13:55.38bkw_Nugget, I hope they forget to stop
13:55.40bkw_muhahaha
13:55.45in-sideno damn error..
13:55.50Nuggetgah!  :)
13:56.01JerJerrun on sip debug
13:56.04ManxPowerin-side: You didn't find any useful information when you searched the mailing list archives?
13:56.04JerJerrun ?
13:56.05JerJerturn
13:56.08ManxPower~mailinglist
13:56.11jbotmethinks mailinglist is Search Asterisk mailing lists by prepending site:lists.digium.com to your Google search.  Browse the mailing list archive at http://lists.digium.com/
13:56.11in-sideno problems..
13:56.12in-side:S
13:56.24in-sideI get tethernet to wach it out
13:56.28in-sideno problems..
13:56.29in-side:S
13:56.43in-sideser said it could find credentials for it
13:56.48in-sidefor the domain..
13:57.08in-sideI tried to chg domain... try to remove it ...  try to "" no gain
13:57.13in-sidesame answer always
13:57.28in-sideIf i use the same configuration in the phone works ok
13:57.40ManxPowerI'll be in #asterisk-stable (where all the cool people hang out) if anyone has questions about 1.0.x
13:57.43*** part/#asterisk ManxPower (~eric@dsl-209-16-67-160.datasync.com)
13:58.00in-sideregister => 1000000001:password@sipbox.ip:5060
13:58.06in-sideI'm using this at sip.conf
13:58.46in-sidetried with username@real:password:username@sipbox.ip:5060 ... no gain
13:59.07in-sidetried to put an * extension at end... no gain :S
13:59.14*** join/#asterisk FITA1 (~m_ahmed@202.5.145.50)
13:59.35FITA1hi all
13:59.36*** join/#asterisk fantomax1 (~fanto@81.208.114.250)
13:59.39in-sidetried to swap the ports and also the configuration to reflect it still not working :S
13:59.50in-sideso.. what hell should be ?
13:59.55Moc_at work again
13:59.57in-sideI just blind at it :S
14:00.04*** join/#asterisk anthm (~anthmct@CPE-69-76-83-52.wi.res.rr.com)
14:00.05*** mode/#asterisk [+o anthm] by ChanServ
14:00.39in-sideI tought to use another box to get asterisk into... but before that I trying to see if it worth the work
14:00.52RoyKwhat sort of timer can I use if I don't have a UHCI USB chip?
14:01.11JerJerrtc
14:01.17JerJeror just 2.6 kernel
14:01.22in-sideJerJer: any idea?
14:01.26FITA1well, I m unable to find related docs to conferencing(meetme2), I wanna ask that can I invite a friend by dialing his number to join conference when I m in conference with other friend
14:01.46JerJerin-side:  i paid others to configure SER, sorry
14:01.58in-sideeheh ok but my problm is with asterisk
14:02.09RoyKJerJer: what in 2.6? I'm running 2.6 already
14:02.13in-sideI wasn't hopping to get help over ser here
14:02.28JerJerthat hardcoding of the relay to udp seems pretty evil to me
14:02.32RoyKI'm _only_ running 2.6
14:02.36in-sideok
14:02.48*** join/#asterisk darwin35 (~darwin35@24.3.226.147)
14:02.52JerJerplus running asterisk and ser on the same box is just wrong
14:03.02darwin35ok I am miffed my *## are not working
14:03.05in-sideya.. it is not to be like there
14:03.11JerJerRoyK:  then ztdummy compiled for 2.6 should just work - i believe
14:03.14darwin35like *70 and so on
14:03.16in-sideit is just temporally
14:03.17HeadachesAboundFITA: Create a call file that sets up a call between his number and an extension that asks him to press one if he wants to join and have a 10 second timeout.  if he presses one, he gets connected to the conference, otherwise, the call is disconnected.
14:03.27in-sideanyway i see no much reason to not do it
14:03.28RoyKJerJer: the point is I can't use ztdummy without uhci
14:03.39in-sideI just want asterisk to handle voicemail and that stuff
14:03.45JerJeri thought ztdummy was changed in 2.6
14:03.51darwin35is there a reason for *## not to work
14:03.51in-sideasterisk is handy for that
14:03.59JerJerto use the built in interrupt crap in 2.6 kernel
14:04.19tzangerodd
14:04.23JerJermaybe just load the zaptel driver with 2.6
14:04.26tzangerGotoIf[$[$something] = 0] works
14:04.29JerJeri dont' run 2.6 so i have no real clue
14:04.35tzangerer
14:04.36tzangersorry
14:04.45tzangergotoif($[${something} = 0] works
14:04.46*** join/#asterisk grolloj (~chatzilla@slim-eth0.horizonlive.net)
14:04.47tzangerbut not
14:04.47CMikeHas anyone tried the D-Link DVG-G1402S   (SIP)
14:04.57tzangergotoif($[${something} = ""]
14:05.02JerJertzanger:  just bang out a bunch of quick c apps to do that bullshit for you
14:05.03in-sideCMike: me why ?
14:05.17in-sideI prefer sipura stuff
14:05.19JerJeryour dialplan will be a lot cleaner
14:05.26*** join/#asterisk Bile_One (~bile_one@pcp03281999pcs.gillst01.ar.comcast.net)
14:05.36CMikein-side: just wondering if it's a good client / gw ?
14:05.42HeadachesAboundtzanger:my testing has shown that if you are trying to compare strings you have to do the following:
14:05.53in-sidelike i said i prefer sipura
14:05.58in-sidebut it is ok
14:06.02JerJerin-side:  you mean Cisco
14:06.06in-sideya now
14:06.08in-sidecisco
14:06.18in-sideanyway i hate cisco
14:06.20CMikeheh
14:06.28in-sideI still continues using it as it was sipura
14:06.37CMikeI haven't tried any sipura stuff yet.. just about everything else.. :)
14:06.48in-sideit is simple plain and works
14:07.04JerJeri just think its great how Cisco re-acquired the same company once again for even more money this time
14:07.05in-sideok.. sometimes it somewhat a pain to know all the parameters
14:07.12HeadachesAboundgotoif($["${something}" != ""]
14:07.33in-sideJerJer: in my opnion cisco just legalize their software
14:07.47JerJerthey should just GPL it all
14:07.48in-sideas they have been using it in linksys for long time...
14:07.58JerJerand stick to making hardware
14:08.01in-sideJerJer: gpl? naa BSd license
14:08.12JerJersure BSD is ok
14:08.34in-sidebsd license rox
14:08.35Nuggetgpl is ucky.
14:08.42in-sideanyway.. i have to resolve my problem damn
14:08.56JerJerI did hear rumors that Extreme Networks is about to open source their code
14:08.58in-sideIt is just a "pia"
14:09.13*** join/#asterisk PCadach (~paul@www.east.telecom.kz)
14:09.16JerJersince a lot of it is based on linux anyway
14:09.25in-sideya..
14:09.28PCadachJerJer: Please, check #4164. Also, check #4185 and #4194 - the ones is first part of split of dead3 from #3967.
14:09.44in-sideok guys
14:09.51in-sidethanks for or help or something
14:10.09in-sidegoogle is our best friend let's see if it continues to be  :p
14:10.29*** join/#asterisk Dishwasha (~chatzilla@208.251.32.70)
14:10.32Dishwashahowdy folks
14:10.48Bile_OneHi Dishwasha
14:12.24mutilatorya gotta wonder what 280 pll idle here for since 95% don't talk
14:12.28mutilatorever
14:13.16*** join/#asterisk sudhir492 (~sudhir@4.7.59.175)
14:13.35in-sidewell that is because you don't know #ser channel
14:13.40jskcr|lappyjust watching the same problems scroll by
14:13.44in-sidethey never ever are there!
14:13.45in-sideeheh
14:15.01HeadachesAboundwe are spys for the fcc and bellsouth looking for ways to undermine the opensource telephony industry.  we will be calling you shortly animenodv@65.111.201.79
14:15.11in-sidepeople there are so busy evcerytime to configure the damn ser that don't have time to talk :p
14:16.33darwin35anyone know why *## is not working
14:17.08in-sideay 11 15:16:54 WARNING[18963]: chan_sip.c:686 retrans_pkt: Maximum retries exceeded on call 2d915963218389f442d6035c7076af4b@192.168.1.1 for seqno 102 (Critical Request)
14:17.09in-sideDestroying call '2d915963218389f442d6035c7076af4b@192.168.1.1'
14:17.15in-sidethis is what I got at asterisk
14:17.22in-sidewhen trying to register at ser :S
14:17.46DishwashaThis is kind of weird, I've got CVS-Head-04/25/05 and for some reason when I make a SIP call from a locally registered phone and call another locally registered phone it works just fine, but when I call from an outside line to an externally registered SIP peer, whenever I use the Dial() application to bridge the call to a locally registered phone it connects successfully and then immediately...
14:17.48Dishwasha...drops the call.
14:18.06*** join/#asterisk Sedorox (brandon@Neptune-W.client.wlgrv.pa.sed6.net)
14:18.06DishwashaI can use all kind of other apps like Answer() and Playback() just fine.
14:22.32*** join/#asterisk GraNNy (rachel@ussenterprise.ufp.org)
14:22.35DishwashaI don't understand this...
14:24.58*** join/#asterisk BerndR (~konversat@mich2-145-8.utaonline.at)
14:25.00DishwashaIn my debugs I have  a CSeq: 1164799369 ACK as it tries the native bridge then CSeq: 103 BYE for Asterisk PBX on the very next SIP header
14:25.01*** join/#asterisk doctorCTI (~DoctorCTI@modemcable094.64-80-70.mc.videotron.ca)
14:26.19sudhir492Can anyone help me with Flash Operator Panel?
14:27.17*** join/#asterisk Gand_DJ (~gandalf@ptr-207-54-104-24.ptr.terago.ca)
14:27.19sudhir492When I try to access through the browser, I see a ring appear and quickly vanish on the screen, and then completely blank screen
14:27.57sudhir492periodically, i see "transferring data from ...." appear at the bottom of the browser.
14:27.58BerndRhello, the load on my asterisk server is very high by doing 40 parallel calls to a agi script witch plays a audio file
14:28.16sudhir492BerndR: it is expected to be hight
14:28.38sudhir492high with 40 simultaneous calls. What kind of hardware?
14:28.54BerndRdual xeon
14:29.16fantomax1i have more than 120 calls on a dual xeon
14:29.20BerndRraid1
14:29.29fantomax1but .. i have too many files warning
14:29.30BerndR1GB RAM
14:29.45Dishwashasudhir492: re-install macromedia's flash program
14:29.57*** join/#asterisk manodehacha (~cj@163.247.44.28)
14:30.02sudhir492On a dual Xeon, you should be able to do more than 40 calls.
14:30.25*** join/#asterisk shaonss (~shaon@61.68.59.254)
14:30.31sudhir492Dishwasha: you mean the flash on my browser? thanks. let me try that
14:30.53Dishwashayar matey
14:31.34shaonssif asterisk is connected with FWD in iax can it do codec translation with other FWD sip user?
14:34.51sudhir492Dishwasha: kahan se bhai?
14:35.12DishwashaNo, I will not make out with you sudhir492
14:36.00*** join/#asterisk fantomax1 (~fanto@81.208.114.250)
14:36.03fantomax1hi all
14:36.17BerndRhi fantomax1
14:36.28fantomax1does anyone know if 1.0.7 or 1.0.6 have a limitin cuncurrent calls
14:37.11Dishwashaanybody here any good at grok'ing SIP headers?
14:37.53BerndRfantomax, where do you see this limitation?
14:38.06*** part/#asterisk Romik (~romik@1.fix.netvision.net.il)
14:38.17fantomax1i have probs with 250 Sip channels
14:38.57Godseytoo many file warnings is a tuneable param
14:39.01Godseyulimit -n
14:39.09Godseywhat does that tell you at your shell prompt?
14:39.31fantomax1too many open files
14:39.45fantomax1unable to create/open sip channel
14:39.53fantomax1unable to create/open RTP channel
14:40.02Godseyyou need to increase the number of file descriptors
14:40.09fantomax1with 2% of cpu
14:40.13Godseydo you use linux 2.4 or 2.6?
14:40.16Godseycpu doesn't matter
14:40.19fantomax12.6 Mandrake
14:40.26fantomax11.0.7 *
14:40.28Godseyand what did ulimit -n say?
14:40.37fantomax1it was 1024
14:40.42fantomax1now is 65535
14:40.53sudhir492Dishwasha: who wants to make out with you? zara sa thikana pooch liya to sar aasman pe chadh gaya :-)
14:40.58fantomax1but the system lose this parameter
14:41.16Godseycat /proc/sys/fs/file-max
14:41.19fantomax1and i use only 200MB
14:41.20Dishwashasudhir492: My sentiments exactly *spit*
14:41.30fantomax1having 2GB available
14:41.34Godseyplease stop confusing the problem
14:41.40Godseyit has nothing to do w/ memory or cpu
14:42.06fantomax1file-max 65535
14:42.06zoais file here ?
14:42.24*** join/#asterisk ontae (~ontae@chello213047229097.tirol.surfer.at)
14:42.29Godseyfantomax: then it looks like mandrake has some sort of limits
14:42.36GodseyI don't know how it's rc scripts are setup
14:42.37fantomax1mandrake too ?
14:42.50*** join/#asterisk ManxPower (~eric@dsl-209-16-67-160.datasync.com)
14:43.00fantomax1which one do u suggest as O.S?
14:43.07Godseythat doesn't matter
14:43.10ontaehi ... need some help with phone-extension
14:43.16Dishwashatry Mac OS X, fantomax1
14:43.17ManxPowerIt's amazing how fast a customer responds to a closed trouble ticket when they didn't provide the requested information.
14:43.17Godseyfix your asterisk startup script
14:43.24Godseyad ulimit -n 16384
14:43.29Godseybefore running asterisk
14:43.31fantomax1yes perfect for AUDIO :)
14:43.44fantomax1fix in which sense ?
14:47.13BerndRgodsey, could my interrupting problem be the same like fantomax's problem?
14:47.25fantomax1it could be i believe
14:47.38GodseyBerndR: I didn't read your msg one sec
14:47.41fantomax1because I have audio drop ou and then failed calls
14:47.54*** join/#asterisk carbon60 (~carbon60@CPE000c41aab294-CM000f9fa6ba66.cpe.net.cable.rogers.com)
14:48.15Godseyis your agi script perl?
14:48.38*** join/#asterisk Kernel_core (Raph@74.229.dial-up.xter.net)
14:48.38Godseyfantomax1: your problem fixed now?
14:48.39BerndRgodsey, when i  do about 40 parallel calls which play an audio file, my callc sounds interrupting
14:48.50GodseyBerndR: is the AGI perl?
14:48.57BerndRpython
14:49.15Kernel_corecan I ask a Question about SIP ?!
14:49.23carbon60I'm experiencing a weird issue: I have variables like RECEPTION=SIP/101&SIP/102 defined, but they don't get picked up when Asterisk starts. A simple 'extensions reload' makes them appear. WTF?
14:49.26GodseyI'm not really sure about that BerndR
14:49.50ontaeHELP NEEDED: How is it possible, if you are registered with one sip-provider (so you have one offical number) and have several internal phones, that these phones can be directly called from outside (PSTN) ??????
14:50.05BerndRgodsey, python calls zope, get vxml, python interprete vxml and send a command to asterisk
14:50.50GodseyI undestand that part, I just don't know how much load forking 40 copies of python causes
14:51.12*** join/#asterisk Sato1 (~rauleli@sato1.wizardteam.com)
14:51.29Godseydo you have IDE drives?
14:51.29Kernel_coreI am connected with Xten to Asterisk ( registered with out any problem ) and with other side , connected to a SIP PEER (Cisco ),  I want to redirect all calls from Xten to my Cisco ! is it possible ?
14:51.40BerndRgodsey, no scsi
14:52.05Godseyis it possible to test w/ out the AGI?
14:52.30Godseyhumm
14:52.37Godseysounds like you need to port asterisk to solaris :)
14:52.39Godseyand then dtrace it
14:52.55Godseysorry, I just don't have enough experiance to help you
14:53.07Kernel_core:|
14:53.35ontae:(
14:53.44GodseyKernel_core: make cisco your sip gateway?
14:54.31Kernel_corehow do I ?
14:54.36Kernel_corein extension.conf ?!
14:55.01Godseyasterisk will have nothing to do w/ it if you want xten to talk directly to cisco
14:55.27Kernel_coreso what should I do ?
14:56.04BerndRgodsey, yes i can test w/ agi and sounds similar interupting
14:56.25Godseyare your sound files .wav?
14:56.32Godseyand callers using gsm?
14:56.33*** join/#asterisk zip (~zip@adsl-66-136-35-17.dsl.snantx.swbell.net)
14:56.40Godsey(is there a codec translation going on)
14:56.49Kernel_coreGodsey: I am new to asterisk , I read about manual and DOC but I got confuse
14:56.49BerndRgodsey, yes gsm
14:57.09Godseyyou may want to store the sound files themselves in gsm
14:57.37GodseyKernel_core: I don't know what you want sorry.
14:57.58FITA1HeadAchesAbound: call files are called automaticall  at * startup, am I write
14:58.30BerndRgodsey, i try so, thanks
14:58.31FITA1or can I call that call file when needed?
14:58.47ontaeHELP NEEDED: How is it possible, if you are registered with one
14:58.47ontae<PROTECTED>
14:58.47ontae<PROTECTED>
14:58.48ontae<PROTECTED>
14:59.00GodseyBerndR: I think codec translation really slows things down
14:59.11Godseywhile if you have .gsm audio on disk no processing power is required
14:59.33BerndRgodsey, yes i'm sure. how du i convert a wav to gsm?
14:59.44Godseywith sox :)
15:00.19Godseyhttp://www.voip-info.org/tiki-index.php?page=Convert+WAV+audio+files+for+use+in+Asterisk
15:00.30fantomax1godsey .. in my case I have a server in dual configuration that receives gsm and goes out in gsm ... but I have the problem I mentioned
15:00.37FITA1<PROTECTED>
15:00.41Godseywhat problem fantomax1
15:00.50fantomax1too many open files ... ect
15:00.58GodseyI told you how to fix that too
15:01.05fantomax1with ulimit ?
15:01.08fantomax1already done
15:01.14eper-werkis it possible to record all calls outbound from the asterisk pbx via the sap/zap channels?
15:01.15shaonssmy asterisk does not use g729 codec though i have licenced!!! i can i use it?
15:01.16Godseyand you re-ran asterisk?
15:01.20fantomax1nothing happed
15:01.22fantomax1yes
15:01.37Kernel_coreGodsey: I am connected with Xten to Asterisk , I have a friend he has Cisco SIP Server , so I want to call a friend in US , with xten I generate call and forward it to my friend SIP server after that he connects to PSTN ! I need just to redirect my Voip traffic to his Cisco SIP Server !
15:01.45Kernel_coreis it possible with Asterisk ?!
15:01.48fantomax1maximum retries exceed on call ... etc
15:02.00*** join/#asterisk jmacz (~jmacz@63.245.86.170)
15:02.04GodseyKernel_core: you said from Xten to his cisco
15:02.10Godseynot from your asterisk host to his cisco
15:02.36Godseyfantomax1: then maybe you compiled w/ a hard file limit
15:02.46Kernel_coreGodsey: I made mistake , sorry
15:02.56ontaegodsey ... may i ask you a question?
15:03.21fantomax1you mean asterisk ?
15:03.34GodseyKernel_core: you just setup his cisco sip (call manager?) as a sip peer
15:03.49GodseyI am leaving for work in a few minutes
15:04.03Kernel_coreGodsey: what about extension.conf ?!
15:04.07fantomax1as soon I arrive to 250 sip channels I have the problem
15:04.14GodseyKernel_core: just like any other sip call
15:04.29Kernel_coreexten => _[123456789]XXXX,1,Dial(SIP/user3_cisco/${EXTEN},60,tr)
15:04.30Kernel_coreexten => _[123456789]XXXX,2,Congestion
15:04.34Kernel_coreis is correct ?!
15:04.34GodseyDial(SIP/${EXTEN}@friends-cisco)
15:04.38*** join/#asterisk The_Duke (~the_duke@80.92.64.103)
15:04.51Kernel_coreuser3_cisco is the name of Cisco SIP peer that I defiend in sip.conf
15:04.54GodseyI don't think so
15:05.02GodseyDial(SIP/${EXTEN}@user3_cisco)
15:05.03Godseythen
15:05.12The_Dukehello, does someone know if faxdetect=no does anything with zaptel/libpri/asterisk 1.0.7???
15:05.31fantomax1Godsey ... last thing ...
15:05.31Godseythat will match a 5 digit #
15:05.37The_Dukeis this feature implemented in 1.0.7?
15:05.40Kernel_coreI know about it ...
15:05.53Godseyfantomax1: I've had 800 sip channels on a single p4 2.8g w/ 1.5gig ram
15:05.56fantomax1the file limit in the compiling is the one that the O.S has at the compiling time ?
15:06.11fantomax1I'd like to know how you did :)
15:06.17Godseyfantomax1: yes I don't know if asterisk es it or not, but it's OPEN_MAX
15:06.24Godseyfantomax1: out of the box
15:06.47ManxPowerGodsey: do a "!ulimit -a" at the asterisk CLI
15:06.55fantomax1i did
15:06.57fantomax165535
15:07.05Kernel_coreGodsey: Thanksssss
15:07.15fantomax1but always the same prob with 250 sip channels
15:07.20Godsey16384
15:07.25fantomax1kernel 2.6
15:07.26GodseyManxPower: I have no problem :)
15:07.32fantomax1yes 16384
15:07.42Godseyfantomax1: maybe you are hitting another limit
15:07.44ManxPowerThere was an update to today's CVS 1.0.x that talks about open files issues.
15:07.45Godseylike inodes
15:07.57GodseyI am running CVS-HEAD
15:08.00fantomax1can i set them on kernel 2.6?
15:08.17Godseyfantomax1: honestly I'd strace asterisk
15:08.29Godseyand see exactly what it's doing when it hits the error
15:08.49Godseybut that isn't always easy :)
15:08.52ManxPowerHere is a copy of the information: http://pastebin.ca/11489
15:08.57fantomax1i imagine
15:09.04ManxPowerGodsey: the info was added to CVS-head like a week or two ago.
15:09.25ontaecan someone PLEASE tell me, if it is possible with * to directly call internal phones from the outside if asterisk registers with only one sip-provider (one number) ?
15:09.58GodseyI use gentoo
15:10.04Godseyit doesn't set user limits by default
15:10.14Godseyso fantomax1 could be hitting /etc/security/limits.conf issues
15:10.20ManxPowerontae: Yes.  You set up an IVR that asks the caller to enter in the specific extension they want to dial.
15:10.26ManxPowerontae: you don't read the Wiki, do you?
15:10.29Godseybut I don't know now mandrake works
15:10.34fantomax1uhmm i changed them too hard nofile 65536
15:10.47CyberKnetManxPower: now what kind of silly question is that? =P"
15:11.00Godseyfantomax1: setting it too high can cause kernel panics just fyi
15:11.05ManxPowerCyberKnet: Yes, I know.  NOBODY reads the Wiki.
15:11.06CyberKnetManxPower: I've never yet met the user who reads documentation =P"
15:11.12Godseyso if your system panics, lower the number ;)
15:11.26ManxPowerCyberKnet: Perhaps we can shame them into doing so.  If we can't, at least we can enjoy torturing them.
15:11.44CyberKnetManxPower: That's always been my first choice =)
15:12.22ManxPowerontae: Asterisk doesn't CARE how the call gets to Asterisk.
15:13.00ontaeManxPower: i am new to asterisk but get it working so far - i read the wiki ; i know the solutions that user can choose to whom/where he wants to be connected - but is there a solution where the user just adds the extension to the offical number and gets so to the wnated extension ???
15:13.38ManxPowerontae: Do you want all incoming calls to go to one extension, or do you want all incoming calls to be prompted for the extension to be connected to?
15:14.06ontaeprompted for the extension to be connected to !!!
15:14.17ManxPowerontae: Yes.  You set up an IVR that asks the caller to enter in the specific extension they want to dial.
15:14.25Godseyfantomax1: I don't have to tune sysctl.conf for this it defaults to 130k ~~
15:14.32ManxPowerontae: What is your incoming number?
15:15.01ManxPowerontae: what does the Asterisk CLI show when a call comes into your SIP phone number?
15:15.08ManxPowerput the information on pastebin.ca
15:15.14ontaean without IVR - without interaction - just adding the extension to the phone number?
15:15.25ManxPowerontae: What you do depends on what your SIP provider is doing?
15:15.26CyberKnethilarity ensues whence ManxPower has his asterisk box call ontae's primitive setup and the line subsequently is busy for years on end
15:15.31GodseyKernel_core: working?
15:15.49ManxPowerYou JUST SAID: <ontae> prompted for the extension to be connected to !!!
15:15.54ManxPowerDo you want to do that?
15:16.10GodseyI made a nextel toll bypass service yesterday :)
15:16.14CyberKnetManxPower: no, he wants them to be able to dial (123) 555-1212-3128
15:16.15ManxPowerCyberKnet: no, I just put people that are less technical than my cat on /ignore.
15:16.17Godseymy aunt has 300 minutes w/ free incoming
15:16.23ontaeManxPower:     -- Executing Wait("SIP/1501507-ae19", "1") in new stack
15:16.24ontae<PROTECTED>
15:16.24ontae<PROTECTED>
15:16.24ontae<PROTECTED>
15:16.24ontae<PROTECTED>
15:16.24ontae<PROTECTED>
15:16.26ontae<PROTECTED>
15:16.26ManxPowerCyberKnet: Well we all know he can't do that.
15:16.27ontae<PROTECTED>
15:16.35CyberKnetManxPower: all of us except one
15:16.38ManxPowerontae: I'm sorry.  I cannot work with you anymore.
15:16.40Godseyso I gave her a DID to call, it generates a call file and calls her right back ;)
15:16.47Godseywith a DISA prompt
15:16.48*** join/#asterisk sharprock (~user@lan-gw.fullnoize.com)
15:16.51ManxPowerEven my cat knows about pastebin.
15:16.58marcus5godsey, thats so two years ago!
15:16.59marcus5;)
15:17.01ontaeManxPower: why not ?
15:17.06marcus5i'll be impressed when you add securid auth ;)
15:17.12Godseymarcus5: well I've been doing something simular w/ cingular for a while :)
15:17.13CyberKnetManxPower: heh. But what your cat puts in the pastebin is likely not of interest to us. heh.
15:17.20NuggetI wish my cat would barf into pastebin and not on my rugs.
15:17.29ManxPowerCyberKnet: My cat knows enough to love Polycom phones.
15:17.34Godseycingular has free mobile to mobile and free call forwarding :)
15:17.39ManxPowerWell, OK, my cat loves the box they come in, but still....
15:17.49Godseyso you forward all phones to asterisk
15:17.54CyberKnetManxPower: heh. My cat is ... retarted ... and is spouting off the wonders of uniden. blegh.
15:18.04Godseyand set asterisk's caller id to your one cingular # used only for toll bypass ;)
15:18.32Godseythe cell never gets the real caller id, but it's free ;)
15:18.51marcus5nice
15:19.07Godseywell if the call is one of our other cells it passes that caller id
15:19.16Godseybut normally we don't call eachother
15:19.21ManxPowerCyberKnet: Gads!  Poor thing.  Does it have brain damage or something?
15:20.13CyberKnetManxPower: It has issues recognizing the table, and subsequently ends up walking there a lot. I think the behavioral correction system overloaded the poor thing a while back.
15:22.37Uberbottzafrir_laptop, thanx for the minisip recommendation.
15:22.47fantomax1i tried the changes is pastebin .. no results
15:23.01fantomax1as soon I hit 250 channels .. I have the prob
15:26.15DishwashaThat's kind of freaky, my username is ewaldo traditionally
15:26.41ontaeManxPower: http://pastebin.ca/11491
15:27.15*** join/#asterisk boch (~as24@200.59.172.98)
15:27.18ontaesorry for disturbing the cahnnel
15:27.23ontaechannel ;-)
15:27.33Dishwashahow do I figure out what the date is on the CVS-HEAD currently?
15:28.14*** join/#asterisk jt_ (~jt@66.28.34.162)
15:28.52jt_can someone please help me out, i get the following error when doing a modprobe wct4xxp
15:28.55jt_pbx zaptel-1.0.7 # modprobe wct4xxp
15:28.55jt_WARNING: Error inserting crc_ccitt (/lib/modules/2.6.10-gentoo-r6/kernel/lib/crc-ccitt.ko): Invalid module format
15:28.58jt_WARNING: Error inserting zaptel (/lib/modules/2.6.10-gentoo-r6/misc/zaptel.ko): Invalid module format
15:29.18*** join/#asterisk ronn (ronn@host217-46-199-164.in-addr.btopenworld.com)
15:29.47*** join/#asterisk coppice (~chatzilla@43.198.17.210.dyn.pacific.net.hk)
15:30.59ChkDigitjt_: It sounds like your compiler/kernel source version are different than the kernel you are running.
15:31.25jt_they are not
15:31.34jt_my source is for 2.6.10-r6
15:31.38jt_so is my compiled kernel
15:32.02*** join/#asterisk m0f0x (m0f0x@m0f0x.user)
15:32.02ontaeCyberKnet: May you help me ? For ManxPower i am too less technical than his f*** cat. You are right, i want to dial (123) 555-1212-3128 for example
15:32.34*** join/#asterisk Patrick^ (~patrickm@pc-0-34.mountaincable.net)
15:33.14ChkDigitjt_: And compiler is the same version for both?
15:33.27*** join/#asterisk ariel_ (~Ariel@adsl-068-157-125-248.sip.mia.bellsouth.net)
15:33.46jt_ChkDigit: what do you mean by compiler, gcc?
15:33.58ariel_Good morning all
15:34.05*** join/#asterisk koehler (~koehler@2Cust13.vr2.fft4.alter.net)
15:34.17koehlerre
15:34.33coppiceariel_: goodnight
15:36.42BerndRgodsey, are you still here?
15:37.19ChkDigitjt_: Yes, and specifically that the kernel, and the module were compiled by the same version of gcc.
15:37.56jt_yeah, all the same
15:38.01jt_gentoo 2004.3 install
15:40.42*** part/#asterisk Vercingetorix (~icechat5@69-173-140-135.agstme.adelphia.net)
15:41.02*** join/#asterisk asdff (~abla@pD902C1D7.dip0.t-ipconnect.de)
15:42.55Bile_OneCan you stop and start a FXS module on a TDM400 card?
15:43.21Bile_OneOr at least reset it?
15:43.23*** join/#asterisk shido6 (~greg@d57-87-253.home.cgocable.net)
15:43.25tzangerBile_One: no, you need to unload wctdm and reload it
15:43.30BerndRmy  audiofiles are shruging ever 5 seconds or so for a moment, any idea?
15:43.46Bile_Onetzanger, thanx
15:44.02Bile_Onewhat is shruging
15:44.34BerndRshruging = quivering (leo :-)
15:44.55Dishwashahah
15:46.58*** part/#asterisk ontae (~ontae@chello213047229097.tirol.surfer.at)
15:47.04BerndRi'm using wav files and calls are using alaw
15:47.41CyberKnetontae: it's not possible without IVR. Buy more DIDs, or set up an IVR. that's the way everyone has to do it, even people with big proprietary PBXs.
15:49.24*** join/#asterisk julianjm (~julianjm@250.Red-80-59-67.pooles.rima-tde.net)
15:50.09*** join/#asterisk firestrm (firestrm@S010600047577bccd.gv.shawcable.net)
15:50.13*** join/#asterisk santiago (~santiago@63.245.86.227)
15:50.31firestrmstill no nufone :(
15:50.38*** join/#asterisk my007ms (~arkuser@217.139.240.35)
15:50.46my007mshi all
15:50.52firestrmhi
15:50.53CyberKnethah. I have a wiki in front of me detailing exactly what to do to make asterisk, and I still manage to forget to install a few dependancies first. *idiot*
15:51.23firestrmCyberKnet, we all do that sometimes..
15:51.27jontowlive and learn and recompile :)
15:51.32my007msany one know what is this msg mean "error while writing audio data: : Broken pipe"
15:52.00firestrmmy007ms, somthing shut down while it was trying to access an audio device..
15:52.02jontowfor some reason, the file descriptor closed when it was trying to write to it
15:52.24CyberKnetfirestrm: my only consolation is that I didn't scream in here "HELP! Asterisk won't compile! What is this bug!?!?!"
15:52.27CyberKnet=)
15:52.37my007msi was try install AMP
15:52.39firestrmCyberKnet, lol..
15:52.54my007msand now when i try run asterisk get this msg
15:53.00my007msy?
15:53.27*** join/#asterisk Lee__ (~Lee__@cpe-69-203-211-144.nyc.res.rr.com)
15:53.42jontowmy007ms; without some serious consideration as to your circumstance, its difficult to say what exactly is wrong.
15:53.43my007mscan asterisk read from config file at the same time with db
15:54.01jontowyes but it is not standard behavior
15:54.18my007msi find something
15:54.33my007msAMP say that he run asterisk
15:54.50my007msy that?
15:55.07my007msand now i try asterisk -r and i see asterisk cmd
15:55.10my007ms?
15:55.52my007mswho to know if this asterisk is work or not
15:56.00my007mshow *
15:56.14jontowdo you have a phone or similar device attached to it yet?
15:57.00my007msi try with softphone
15:57.33my007msbut it now working and even i can not see debug come from asterisk
15:57.33my007ms?
15:57.44Hmmhesayshmm asterisk@home doesn't have their license on their page, anyone know if it's gpl'd?
15:58.14Dishwashait would have to be, it's built with gpl'd software
15:58.26Hmmhesayshaha, good call
15:58.50Hmmhesaysbut there are some pieces that they wrote I'm assuming
15:59.00Dishwashanope, all amp and *
15:59.19HmmhesaysFOP too i'm guessing
15:59.24Hmmhesaysnm, that's part of amp
15:59.50my007mswhat if i need to make asterisk don't used any zaptel
15:59.56Hmmhesaysjust curious cause I was going to put it up in a small office out in the sticks
16:01.08*** join/#asterisk Gh0sty (~Ghosty@ip-81-11-211-18.dsl.scarlet.be)
16:03.13cjksorry guys. i was asking yesterday if anyone is using a head version in a production environnment
16:03.47cjkand i left then
16:03.53my007msany one know where i can find file to stop or add .so file
16:03.53cjkmaybe aone can answer me now
16:03.54my007ms?
16:04.29*** join/#asterisk kryme (~kryme@66-211-192-4.velocity.net)
16:06.22Inv_arpcjk: plenty of guys here use bleeding edge (im not one of them)
16:06.58BerndRstill no idea for my interrupting audio problem?
16:07.12my007msasterisk stop with in [app_rxfax.so]
16:07.18my007mshow can stop that
16:07.29my007msi don't need this [app_rxfax.so]
16:09.08*** join/#asterisk Jas_Williams (~Jason@host217-43-100-176.range217-43.btcentralplus.com)
16:09.16*** join/#asterisk Uberbot (qbqsghfa@pcp01879960pcs.sandia01.nm.comcast.net)
16:09.25ManxPowerInv_arp: I thought I was the only one left using 1.0.x!
16:09.31ManxPowerBrother I have found you!
16:09.32Dishwashahttp://pastebin.ca/11497
16:09.35Dishwashacan anybody tell me why?
16:09.40Inv_arpManxPower: lol
16:10.02*** join/#asterisk muntz (~msh@acheron.hsd1.ma.comcast.net)
16:10.07*** join/#asterisk |Vulture| (~V@95.236.204.68.cfl.res.rr.com)
16:10.16ManxPowerInv_arp: you know all the cool people hang out in #asterisk-stable, right?
16:10.17|Vulture|anyone else having problems with BV?
16:10.26*** join/#asterisk outtolunc (outtolunc@adsl-66-218-53-170.dslextreme.com)
16:10.35my007msi need to stop asterisk from [app_rxfax.so]
16:10.42my007msany one help
16:10.43my007ms?
16:11.11ManxPower|Vulture|: I almost NEVER have problems with my provider.
16:11.23Lee__would there be anyone here who has successfully embedded Asterisk onto a CF card?
16:11.31shido6yes
16:11.38Lee__my target is a Soekris 4801
16:11.38shido6dont expect to et vmail on it
16:12.01Lee__shido6: what base OS did you use?
16:12.43|Vulture|ManxPower: who is your provider?
16:12.59|Vulture|ManxPower: I just use BV for LD and it all seems down right now
16:13.01ManxPower|Vulture|: I-55 Telecom using PRIs
16:13.04Dishwashahttp://pastebin.ca/11498
16:13.28|Vulture|ManxPower: I only have 3 areacodes covered with PRIs right now
16:14.03ManxPower|Vulture|: I use Teliax and/or NuFone for VoIP calls that are not handled my my own provider.
16:14.22shido6Dishwasha ?
16:14.27ManxPower(granted my PSTN provider gives me unlimited free calling to Mississippi and Louisiana and I seldom call outside those states)
16:14.35*** join/#asterisk paulsen (~erik@193.217.180.149)
16:14.50Dishwashashido6: for some reason when I answer the call it connects and then hangs up
16:15.20DishwashaI'm not as talented at reading the debugs, but I think my provider is hanging up the call, was wondering if anybody saw anything fishy
16:16.02Gand_DJhrm, is it supposed to take (what seems forever) for format partitions on a raid 0 array? (2 x 80gb hd)
16:16.32muntzI need to run Asterisk on a Debian ipmasq machine. Is there a wiki anyone knows for this?
16:16.45Lee__Gand_DJ: how long is forever?
16:16.56Gand_DJ1+ hour
16:17.03Gand_DJI formatted a 20gb partition for xp
16:17.07muntzI have everything working on my FreeBSd install but I want to be able to run asterisk on Debian
16:17.07Gand_DJthat didn't take long
16:17.11Lee__definitely not.
16:17.35Lee__muntz: there's an asterisk package in sarge and sid
16:17.35Gand_DJbut I'm setting up another 30 gb partition on this array.. and it's been crawling since it hit 23%... been over an hour
16:17.38muntzipmasq == NAT
16:17.45jskcr|lappymuntz: it runs fine on debian
16:17.51*** join/#asterisk JonR800 (jr@pcp05013027pcs.plyntv01.mi.comcast.net)
16:17.54Gand_DJupto 29%
16:17.59muntzLee__: I have built asterisk on Sarge.
16:18.14Lee__cool. so what's yr question?
16:18.31muntzThe only issue is, I can't register iax with voicepulse
16:18.40shido6Dishwasha show me the sip.conf
16:18.49Lee__Gand_DJ: I've only dealt with RAID on Linux, couldn't help you. sorry.
16:18.58Lee__muntz: I don't think Debian has anything to do with that.
16:18.59Gand_DJheh
16:19.05*** join/#asterisk PBXtech (~nik@67.107.241.3.ptr.us.xo.net)
16:19.11muntzit happened once (registration) after I did an iptables -F
16:19.56*** join/#asterisk bjohnson (~bjohnson@jecinc.tor.istop.com)
16:19.56*** join/#asterisk zeedo (~zeedo@www.bsrf.org.uk) [NETSPLIT VICTIM]
16:19.56*** join/#asterisk A-Tuin|work (~A-Tuin@nat.office.legend.net.uk) [NETSPLIT VICTIM]
16:19.57*** join/#asterisk riksta (~rick@host81-155-216-40.range81-155.btcentralplus.com) [NETSPLIT VICTIM]
16:19.57*** join/#asterisk Gunnar (~gunnar@34.80-203-209.nextgentel.com) [NETSPLIT VICTIM]
16:19.57*** join/#asterisk Synapse- (~pnats@c211-30-74-249.belrs2.nsw.optusnet.com.au) [NETSPLIT VICTIM]
16:19.57*** join/#asterisk richeros (~richeros@dsl-98-29.br.tiscali.no) [NETSPLIT VICTIM]
16:19.57*** join/#asterisk daork (~daork@202.89.128.251) [NETSPLIT VICTIM]
16:20.05Lee__muntz: what's Asterisk say about it?
16:20.16Dishwashashido6: http://pastebin.ca/11499
16:20.22muntzm
16:20.34muntzum. Asterisk Ready?
16:20.46muntzthen no dialtone
16:20.58Lee__turn the verbosity up and type 'iax2 show registry'
16:21.09*** join/#asterisk nwhit (~nwhit@65.107.59.67.ptr.us.xo.net)
16:21.10*** join/#asterisk mistral (~mistral@jstevenson.plus.com)
16:21.14PBXtechare the PA168 easily prone to echo? never had so many problems
16:21.43nwhitWith call parking, how do I return a parked call back to the extension that parked it after the timeout?
16:22.11Dishwashashido6: it's only a problem with the Dial application, if I Answer() the call and do a Playback() I hear the message just fine.
16:22.21muntzI started asterisk with -vvvgc
16:22.33CyberKnetdoes anyone have a 1 port FXO 1 port FXS that they've outgrown?
16:22.35*** join/#asterisk bannerman (~bannerman@209.216.176.43)
16:22.49muntzand uh, iax2 show registry displays nothing being registered
16:22.51shido6Dishwasha, i will edit one for you
16:22.55shido6and you can test that one
16:23.08Dishwashahttp://pastebin.ca/11500 is my extension.conf
16:23.42muntzagain, this is with config files from the FreeBSD install which work perfectly there
16:24.29bannermanI've got the weirdest call dropping problems. A few minutes into a call, seems random, the outbound voice will just quit- we can hear the other side fine, but they can't hear us. 15-20 seconds later, it starts working again.
16:24.42bannermanDoesn't happen with Broadvoice, only with Nufone
16:25.12Moonwickwelcome to the wonderful world of voice over IP.
16:25.14bannermanI've tried with CVS-HEAD and with stable
16:25.26bannermantried trunk=yes and trunk=no
16:25.31PBXtechbannerman is that a cisco phone?
16:25.34bannermanused multiple codecs
16:25.45*** join/#asterisk Juggie (~agony@CPE00c049d9f271-CM00137186c8d8.cpe.net.cable.rogers.com)
16:25.50Moonwicksee if asterisk is trying to move itself out of the media path
16:25.56Moonwickthat usually causes problems for me.
16:26.16bannermanPolycom IP500, Ariavoice C-302P and some softphone
16:26.29Moc_OMG a Cessna near the white house... Call security...
16:26.38bannermanTried with ulaw, gsm, G.729
16:28.04jt_shido6: pm
16:28.14muntzWhen I turn off ipmasq, I'm registered with voicepulse
16:28.27muntzbut still no dialtone
16:28.36The_DukeI have a problem with fax detection...
16:28.54muntzSipura device seems active
16:29.04The_Dukei have 2 BRI channels configured in context TELCO and 2 in context PABX
16:29.23bannermanmoonwick: It happens on incomning and outgoing calls, incoming calls can be transferred (t)
16:29.37The_Dukeas soon as a fax call coming from TELCO going to PABX is answered by the fax machine
16:29.38bannermanAsterisk can't be trying to move itself out of the media path.
16:29.42shido6your sip.conf is all screwy for nat, Dishwasha
16:29.47Lee__muntz: if iax2 show registry shows nothing, you aren't registered with voicepulse
16:29.59The_Dukeasterisk detects the fax signal, tries to find a fax extension in TELCO, which does not exist
16:30.01shido6msg me
16:30.16The_Dukebut then it tries o find a fax extension in PABX...
16:30.25The_Dukedoes someone know why?????
16:30.33The_Dukehow can I disable that???
16:31.02The_Dukefax detection should only forward to the fax extension of the current context....
16:31.24*** part/#asterisk santiago (~santiago@63.245.86.227)
16:31.58ManxPowerThe_Duke: Make sure you do your faxdetect= settings BEFORE the channel => entries
16:32.27The_DukeManxPower: what should I set???
16:32.43The_DukeI did faxdetect=no for the TELCO context and channels
16:32.56The_Dukeand faxdetect=incoming for the PABX context....
16:33.24ManxPowerThe_Duke: Um, faxdetect=incoming doesnt' do anything.
16:33.33JerJerok is muther fucking game on
16:33.40JerJereverybody pay attention here
16:33.41ManxPowerOh!  Wait.  Hold on, The_Duke
16:33.52JerJerI know there are a lot of asterisk providers now
16:33.57Dishwashashido6 rocks!
16:34.05The_Dukewhy does asterisk look up the fax extension in both contexts? even if the call is completely handeled by one single context...
16:34.07JerJerbut there are also muther fuckers out there that are scamming people
16:34.08shido6did it work, Dishwasha ?
16:34.20Dishwashayep, it was mismatching codecs
16:34.30The_DukeManxPower: Ok, I wait.. ;-)
16:34.40ManxPowerThe_Duke: What calls do you want to do fax detection on?
16:34.47ManxPowercalls coming from the telco, right?
16:34.59DishwashaI should have done that, all faqs and wiki's recommend doing a disallow and an explicit allow
16:35.57The_Dukeno calls coming from PABX, so those in context PABX....
16:36.16The_Dukecalls coming from telco are just bridged 1:1 to our PABX....
16:36.24ManxPowerThe_Duke: What context are the calls coming from the pbx sent to?
16:36.34JerJerhas anyone heard of Mobilkom
16:36.41The_Dukecall from the pbx are in context PABX
16:37.07The_Dukei need to do fax detection so that fax goes out over the isdn telco provider instead of voip...
16:37.08ManxPowerThe_Duke: so you want faxdetect=incoming for those channels, right?
16:37.33ManxPowerThe_Duke: remember all this stuff is from the perspective of ASTERISK, not of the user/device.
16:38.20ManxPowerThe_Duke: put your zapata.conf on pastebin.ca
16:38.33The_DukeManx Power: just a second...
16:40.54The_DukeManxPower: http://pastebin.ca/11505
16:42.28ManxPowerThe_Duke: I don't see anything wrong.
16:42.54The_Dukeok...
16:43.06The_Dukelet me show in another pastebin what happens....
16:43.15The_Dukeon my asterisk, eventually it's a bug...
16:44.39ManxPowerThe_Duke: I have to get back to work
16:44.55*** join/#asterisk AgiNamu (~AgiNamu@216.230.151.230)
16:46.48jontowanyone using/happy with their T100P under FreeBSD 5.x-STABLE ?
16:47.01Nuggethttp://joelonsoftware.com/articles/Wrong.html  <-- apropos to the recent "code hygiene" debate on the mailing list.
16:47.08dtwilsonanyone who has used the flash operator panel - have you noticed flash killing resources on the client machine?
16:47.09The_Dukeperhaps someone else can help....
16:47.18jontowjust curious; im using debian now and i hear my PRI has a chance of going away.. so i think im going to redo my installation and gain the PRI experience on FreeBSD while I can
16:47.38jontowdtwilson; of course, you realize.. flash does that anyway? :)
16:47.56dtwilsonJust looking at the live demo and after a short while am getting "script in the movie is causing flash to slow down...."
16:48.07jontowah, ouch
16:48.33Lee__I think Macromedia's official response would go something like "get a faster CPU"
16:48.46dtwilsonjontow: yeah I do realise flash does normally slow things down a fair bit but have never seen that before
16:48.52The_Dukemy asterisk box is detecting fax correctly, it looks for a fax extension in the context of the calling channel... which doesn't exist, then it looks for a fax extension in the context of the receiving channel, the call did never leave the first context.... and then asterisk tries to connect the receiving end of a communication with the fax extension and hangsup on the sending end....
16:48.59jontowi have; usually means for some reason RAM is at a premium
16:49.06The_Dukehow am i supposed to get a fax that way???
16:49.10dtwilsonLee_: well my cpu isn't terribly slow at 2GHz
16:49.39dtwilsonthough i do have loads of other things running so its mostl likely that
16:50.12jontowpretty slow.. you should consider upgrading to a PENTIUM 9000! (just wait.. it'll happen)
16:50.13jontow;)
16:50.40PBXtechZAP -> *box -> IAX -> *box -> SIP phone    is that to much lag?  (for echo consideration)
16:50.46jontownah but seriously.. i ran the flash operator panel (server side) on a p3/450 with 128MB of RAM, and the client on a dual p3/450 with 384MB RAM
16:50.55PBXtechall local
16:51.21jontowpbxtech; not really.. i was doing that over the internet for a bit, until the QoS was abolished on one end :)
16:52.42PBXtechhmm thats what i though, but i cant kill this echo
16:53.36jontowdo you get echo on the * boxes locally .. going out via zap?
16:54.05PBXtechonly people complaining are the SIP on the remote * box
16:54.20PBXtechI do PRI ZAP to PRI ZAP on that same trunk no probls
16:54.32jontowyeah.. thats funny :o  what phones? ;)
16:54.41PBXtechPA168's
16:54.49jontowah, no experience with those
16:54.52PBXtechand handful of 7960
16:54.56AgiNamuPA168 rocks
16:55.01bkw_hehe
16:55.04bkw_we have some coming too
16:55.23bkw_AgiNamu, cluecon registration is open.. as is sponsorship stuffs
16:55.31AgiNamuim in guatemala
16:55.37AgiNamuWhat's cluecon
16:55.38bkw_oh ya thats right
16:55.39PBXtechi dont think its the phones
16:56.01bkw_AgiNamu, a developers conference
16:56.01AgiNamuthe PA168 echo cancellation doesnt work well with speakerphone
16:56.06bkw_for opensource voip
16:56.19AgiNamubut it does a pretty good job with the handset
16:56.28PBXtechwhere is it at bkw?
16:57.27PBXtechthe remote * doesnt have a zaptel card.. that wouldnt matter would it? not doing iax trunking
16:57.33PBXtechjust iax
16:57.39|Blaze|If I'm having some echo problems with a TDM400P, is there any chance a Sipura-3000 would work better?
16:57.50jontowis it running ztdummy or no?
16:57.53ManxPower|Blaze|: There's a chance.
16:58.02PBXtechyes ztdummy
16:58.18ManxPower|Blaze|: Notice I said "chance" not "it will work better"
16:58.35|Blaze|ManxPower: yeah, all depends where the actual echo problem is originating
17:00.24PBXtechplain iax doesnt require timing does it?
17:01.33bkw_no
17:02.23AgiNamuhttp://www.wonkette.com/politics/culture-war/index.php#obscure-phone-carrier-forms-very-strategic-alliance-102949
17:02.36AgiNamuAnyone seen that? Some telephone company claims MCI is actually a kiddie porn ring :P
17:03.07nestArlol
17:03.40PBXtech[bkw_]: what is cluecon targeted toward?
17:03.47nwhitWith call parking, how do I return a parked call back to the extension that parked it after the timeout?
17:04.39DishwashaQuick question, can I have * send an email with a mp3 attached voicemail rather than wav?
17:04.46AgiNamulol, it's a christian telephone company, they call people and then tell them not to use Gay T&T
17:04.51jontowpbxtech; another question.. have you tested the bandwidth on both ends?
17:05.19*** join/#asterisk harryvv (~leonardo@S010600055d210201.vs.shawcable.net)
17:05.32PBXtechyes seems to have a 500k limit, using gsm to transport. havnt seen them go above 8 concurrent calls
17:05.41PBXtechrouter limit
17:06.22AgiNamu"AT&T sells sex favours?!?!?"
17:06.34PBXtechisnt that a reason to use ATT?
17:06.50AgiNamuheheh
17:07.04bkw_PBXtech, people that want to develop Open Source telephony/voip applications
17:07.23PBXtechso geared more for developers
17:07.31bkw_yes
17:07.47AgiNamu"So, AT&T sells child pornography?" "No, that's MCI"
17:09.20bkw_AgiNamu, thats funny
17:10.03*** join/#asterisk netofsickcoder (~netofsick@200.121.129.178)
17:10.16AgiNamuIt's also pathetic. people like this give religion a bad name.
17:10.21AgiNamuOh yea, and the crusades. those didnt help much.
17:10.25AgiNamuand bush.
17:10.43AgiNamuOK, I guess saying "Yes, God hates AT&T and MCI and Verizon" is low on the list of things that makes religion look bad.
17:11.03DishwashaSomebody needs their ritalin
17:12.22CoaxDaginamu: Bwahahahahaha
17:13.01*** join/#asterisk eddi3 (empty@cm162.gamma226.maxonline.com.sg)
17:14.08AgiNamui just know someone is gonna sell Christian VoIP and make a killing
17:14.20AgiNamu$49.95 for unlimited* ld. (* 1000 minutes)
17:14.41bkw_but wouldn't Christian voip packets be going along the same wire as 100% of the porn does
17:14.43Moonwickcalls to jesus are free!
17:14.43AgiNamuand say "unlike other providers, we don't endorse internet porn. we provide safe VoIP for your kids. Otherwise, thye could be talking and get gay pictures thru the phones"
17:14.52bkw_or will they try to make the packets porn resistant?
17:14.54AgiNamubkw_, the people who buy this can't tell a packet from a broom.
17:15.09bkw_well do you realize what they are doing is illegal
17:15.19bkw_the FCC should step in and smack them
17:15.23AgiNamuWhat, calling up and lying to people is illegal?
17:16.14bkw_yes for gain.. you lie about shit its bad
17:16.14bkw_haha
17:16.14CyberKnetbkw_: Do you know anyone who has a 1 port FXO 1 port FXS that they have outgrown and would like to sell?
17:16.14bkw_ya AgiNamu is a funny guy
17:16.14bkw_CyberKnet, nope
17:16.15CyberKnetbkw_: thx
17:16.23bkw_CyberKnet, you  lucky bastards.. on cox...
17:16.26bkw_we had cox here
17:16.28bkw_one time
17:16.33bkw_they sold to some hick ass cable company
17:16.34CyberKnetbkw_: heh
17:16.42bkw_now we have cable modem services with only 5 gig/mth transfer
17:16.45bkw_for the same price
17:16.48CyberKnetbkw_: ouch.
17:16.57CyberKnetbkw_: unlimited transfer, 4 megabit
17:17.00bkw_hell if you run windows.. you'll eat that 5 gig up fast.. just on updates :P
17:17.08CyberKnethah!
17:17.12shido6yeah
17:18.16AgiNamuum, apparently no one here has run yum? :P
17:18.16Inv_arpbkw_: what happens when u exceed?
17:18.16jontowunlimited; didn't care what i did with it as long as i wasn't selling stuff or stealing stuff
17:18.16CyberKnetwell, if you hear of anyone trying to offload even just an FXS let me know =) FXO can always be gotten for ten bucks from ebay.
17:18.16jontowinv_arp; they charge you like $10/gig/month after
17:18.17bkw_you "maybe" charged 5 dollars per gig
17:18.17AgiNamuyum takes more time getting headers than windows update took yesterday
17:18.17jontowah
17:18.17Inv_arpomg
17:18.17jontownot as bad as i thought
17:18.17Juggiei get 60gigs/month for 40$ 3mbit
17:18.17Juggiebut its a softcap
17:18.17Inv_arpmy news pr0n/warez is 20gig a month alone
17:18.17Juggiethey only get mad in areas where they are congested.
17:18.17CyberKnetJuggie: I get unlimited gigs / month for $40 4mbit
17:18.24Juggieyah we used to be unlimited here...
17:18.24bkw_the cable company has this thing that says anyone going over tha tis downloading music and warez
17:18.27bkw_and should pay more
17:18.36Juggiebut they are saying 60 now
17:18.36bkw_apparently they have never downloaded a linux distro
17:18.38bkw_or used the internet
17:18.43CyberKnetbkw_: well it's either that or running a voip company off of it =P"
17:18.46Juggiei dont do anything more then like 20-30
17:18.51Juggieso i dont care
17:18.52bkw_CyberKnet, well I don't do that
17:18.57*** join/#asterisk Flyboy6440 (~Bobo@192.76.82.90)
17:19.01CyberKnetbkw_: obviously =)
17:19.09bkw_it would be stupid to use residential internet to do that in the first place
17:19.17bkw_outtolunc, what? the asshole Jerjer comments?
17:19.42outtolunchehe
17:19.42bkw_btw JerJer FUCK YOU!
17:19.42AgiNamuouttolunc, which comments? the "stfu bkw!"
17:19.42outtoluncnods
17:19.42Juggieso much hate :P
17:19.42bkw_I just stated facts
17:19.46bkw_and he started being a prick
17:19.54CyberKnetaaah. I can get a 12 FXO / 12 FXS for $549. if only I could cut it into 12 pieces and resell. =)
17:20.07AgiNamuImagine, JerJer in a video confesional.. "look, i worked hard on h323. if those idiots cant understand.... damn that bkw. who does he think he is?"
17:20.27outtolunccomeon guys, just 2+ days till the weekend... you can make it <G>
17:20.38NuggetMTV's The Real World: #asterisk
17:20.40bkw_If JerJer worked hard.. it would be a "working" channel driver for EVERYONE
17:20.54AgiNamuH.323 ain't for pussies.
17:20.58AgiNamu;)
17:20.58bkw_not just "oh use old ass GCC to make it work and X and Y versions of pwlib and openh323"
17:21.07bkw_h323 is easy
17:21.20Juggiewhat amuses me is that its taking like 3-4megs of source
17:21.22Juggieto make it work
17:21.31outtoluncand don't forget the salt over the shoulder
17:21.33bkw_well that new driver from objsys is up
17:21.39Juggieiax is in a device with like 32k of flash
17:21.45Juggieand its taking megs of code for h323
17:21.49Juggiesomething doesnt seem right
17:22.09CoaxDHang on a minute while i pack a bowl.
17:22.26bkw_http://bugs.digium.com/view.php?id=4234
17:22.27*** join/#asterisk |Vulture| (~V@95.236.204.68.cfl.res.rr.com)
17:22.28bkw_try that out
17:22.49|Vulture|anyone here use teliax?
17:22.54bkw_Juggie, alot of pwlib isn't used
17:22.59*** part/#asterisk wols (klingens@p549DFED2.dip.t-dialin.net)
17:23.25CoaxDDamn, I just got a hell of a quote.  Something like $560/mo for a full data T1 to god-knows-what-backbone.
17:23.38CoaxDlink, bandwidth, everything
17:23.42AgiNamuIAX2 is 54kb of source for the PA168
17:23.45PBXtech|Vulture| i do
17:24.15Juggiebkw_, then we have to find a way to lighten the load.... or rewrite the parts of pwlib being used
17:24.22bkw_well no
17:24.24|Vulture|PBXtech: how do you like them? I saw a PSTN connection fee... so you pay basically $.02 for the first min?
17:24.29Juggieit should not need 3-4megs of source for h323
17:24.55*** join/#asterisk riksta (~rick@host81-155-216-40.range81-155.btcentralplus.com)
17:24.58bkw_well yes you should
17:25.07bkw_do what I told you in the priv msg
17:25.09bkw_and i'll show you
17:25.13AgiNamuwait, this new driver uses Woomera?
17:25.23bkw_no
17:25.28AgiNamucause i remember a long time ago seeing other driver
17:25.28bkw_the objsys one does not
17:25.36AgiNamuand you could use G729 without digium license.
17:25.54PBXtech|Vulture| other than that i like them :)
17:26.06CyberKnetheard of the Soyo N400S?
17:26.23|Vulture|hmm maybe I should do nufone then... I don't like the idea of a connection carge
17:26.35CoaxDconnection charges suck donkey balls
17:27.30CyberKnetCoaxD: yes. they do.
17:27.39*** join/#asterisk jabbzy (~dygup@noiseboys.force9.co.uk)
17:27.48PBXtechis the jitterbuffer setting in iax.conf not really needed for lan connections right
17:28.10jabbzyit depends on the saturation of the lan
17:29.04jabbzy:)
17:29.22ManxPowerPBXtech: usually not.
17:29.24CoaxDPlaying MPEG stream from Eifel 65 - You Spin Me Round (Dj niko remix).mp3 ...
17:29.26PBXtechcould be an echo cause thou
17:32.03PBXtechthat sounds like a cool song
17:33.37CoaxDIndeed it is
17:33.49PBXtechdcc it to me :)
17:34.09*** join/#asterisk [TK]D-Fender (~joe@4.67.252.216.dsl1.colba.net)
17:35.06PBXtechalone with all your porn
17:35.32PBXtechunless you work for MCI  (heard rummors)
17:35.55[TK]D-FenderI'm in Montreal, QC and have just tried to get Bell to provide Disconnect Supervision on my residential home line and they say that they'll only offer it to business customers.  Any other Canadians or Quebecers here have any related experiences to share?
17:36.30*** join/#asterisk aionaever (~aionaever@208.187.197.34)
17:36.38*** join/#asterisk PTG123 (~PTG123@ip68-106-24-139.ph.ph.cox.net)
17:36.55CoaxDhahaha
17:38.31Juggiewhat is disconnect supervision?
17:39.02|Vulture|Juggie: when the remote party hangs up it sends a signal to let you know
17:39.28Juggieumm.... isnt that called Loop Current? :)
17:39.56|Vulture|I just know i had an office that didn't have it and it really messed with my DP
17:40.20*** join/#asterisk roamer323 (~sing@67.71.61.54)
17:40.33JuggieDP?
17:42.14|Vulture|dialplan
17:42.36[TK]D-FenderMy office doesn't have it either and we are wondering if its causing us problems here too.  Bell are total fuckers here most of the time.  If I could get DSL while using another carrier's line service I would.  Mind you if we could get dry-line DSL here I wouldn't be on the PSTN at all.
17:42.38*** join/#asterisk netofsickcoder (~netofsick@200.121.129.178)
17:42.54Juggieahh, well i mean modems/fax machines have been detecting hangup for years
17:42.54[TK]D-Fender(in a CPE way)
17:43.09|Vulture|TK: yea they are like "What is that?.. I don't understand, why do you need that"
17:43.51[TK]D-FenderActually while I'm at it, is Kewlstart actually of any use on a TDM FXS channel, like the one I've got an ADSI phone on?
17:43.58Juggiei thought when someone hung up, your phone received a current, or there was a voltage flip?
17:44.38[TK]D-Fender|Vulture| : yeah its took 4 transfers before I could find anybody who had a CLUE what I was talking about to acknowledge it and another tranfer after only to be refused
17:45.56jaigerJuggie, I think some use silence detection to approximate hangup
17:46.15[TK]D-FenderJuggie : what you described is Kewlstart and the kind of Disconnect supervision I am looking to have placed on my line which has none apparently
17:46.31Juggiewell... i cant vouch for having the service or not, but i've been working with phone programming, dialogic boards for example... for 5 years here at work
17:46.40Juggieand i've never heard of that... or had any problem detecting hangup
17:47.00[TK]D-FenderGuess your telco is doing things right.....
17:47.09Juggiei'm with bell in ontario
17:47.14Juggiewell, not i'm... the goverment
17:47.30Juggiewe may just have that on all our lines, and i dont know about it
17:48.06[TK]D-FenderOr nobody has been adversely affectd....
17:48.27Juggiewell, we run thousands of lines on POTS
17:48.37Juggierunning automated systems
17:48.46Juggieso if there was a problem detecting hangup, i'd have heard of it :)
17:48.57ManxPowerPretty much all telco lines in the USA have kewlstart.
17:49.08AgiNamuI thought kewlstart was something Mark made up
17:49.20ManxPowerAgiNamu: The TERM is non-standard.  The feature is not.
17:49.21[TK]D-FenderBell.ca = fuckers.  CRTC is starting to seriously piss me off....
17:49.49[TK]D-Fender(no offense Juggie unless you set policy ;))
17:49.52ManxPower"Loopstart with Far End Disconnect Supervision" is the correct term, I think.
17:50.32outtolunc..
17:50.33*** join/#asterisk meppl (mephisto@p54AAE4C3.dip.t-dialin.net)
17:50.55JerJerstarting to ?
17:51.07bkw_Kewlstart?
17:51.32[TK]D-FenderManx : Well I called their "loopy" techs, transferred to a "Supervisor" and felt very "Disconnected" at their lack of service.  "End" of story....
17:51.45[TK]D-FenderHopefully "Far" from over though....
17:51.50CyberKnetis H.323 support kind of chancy?
17:52.26[TK]D-FenderMagic 8-ball says "H.323"?  Please reconsider.
17:52.38[TK]D-Fender;>
17:52.40ManxPower[TK]D-Fender: Plug in a lighted phone, powered only by the telco (commonly called "princess") have someone call you, have them hangup.  If the lighted keypad goes dark for a moment you have kewlstart.
17:53.45[TK]D-FenderManx a tech who came into my company confirmed it calling the CO (for my business problem) and Bell's help desk confirmed they don't offer it to rezzies....
17:54.05[TK]D-Fenderand the fact its not even enabled here at my work for some freakish reason
17:54.20`Sauronyou could also have winkstart
17:54.23`Sauronerr
17:54.28`Sauronnot that you might have it
17:54.32ManxPower[TK]D-Fender: and you believe them?
17:54.40`Sauronjust, that winkstart is another one of the weird names they use for their stuff
17:54.45[TK]D-FenderManxPower : Yeah, a phone loop never goes full-open otherwise right? (Barring scissors)
17:54.55ManxPower[TK]D-Fender: Hmm?
17:55.20[TK]D-FenderManxPower : Yeah, esp when a tech 1 foot from me calls it in can cofirms to my face
17:56.00m0f0xHi, can someone help me?
17:56.02ManxPower[TK]D-Fender: Ah!  So canadian telco people never lie.  I'll remember that.
17:56.16[TK]D-FenderThey rarely lie about BAD news ;)
17:56.17ManxPowerThose Canadians, there're so honest!
17:56.17m0f0xI'm new to Asterisk, and I have lots of questions :)
17:56.23blitzrageManxPower: of course we are
17:56.25ariel_everyone lies at one point or another.
17:56.33blitzragem0f0x: I've been doing it for 2 years, and so do I :)
17:56.40ManxPowerblitzrage: But are telco people really Canadians?
17:56.51ManxPowerI mean, I thought telco people were a different species.
17:56.51[TK]D-FenderMARTIANS I say!
17:57.03m0f0xblitzrage Can I bother you ;)?
17:57.07ariel_telco people are well just that telco people.
17:57.19blitzrageManxPower: some Canadians claim to be telecom professionals :)
17:57.22ariel_m0f0x, ask the questions.
17:57.22[TK]D-FenderNah... blitzrage has been "distubed" LONG before your arrival ;)
17:57.32blitzrage:D
17:57.38[TK]D-Fenderdisturbed even ;)
17:58.06blitzragem0f0x: I've spent lots of time writing docs - http://www.asteriskdocs.org - and also check out http://www.voip-info.org. After you've read both of those sites, come back and ask me a question :)
17:58.08my007mshi all
17:58.25my007mshow to make hold work
17:58.31my007msi install mpg123
17:58.36blitzragepress the hold button :)
17:58.39*** join/#asterisk flickerfly (~jritchie@rebekah.bible.edu)
17:58.43my007msbut not work
17:58.48my007ms:)
17:59.00m0f0xI'm trying to setup a small PBX with Asterisk, just for softphone communications (internal and external)... A machine without Asterisk hardware still needs to have zaptel.conf and its configurations?
17:59.42ManxPower~docs
17:59.45jbotDocumentation can be found at http://digium.com/index.php?menu=documentation or http://www.digium.com/handbook-draft.pdf or #asterisk-doc, or http://www.voip-info.org/wiki-Asterisk, or http://www.asteriskdocs.org
17:59.53*** join/#asterisk HoopyCat (user@nocrtucker.netaccnt.net)
17:59.58marcus5mofox; only if you want to use meetme or musiconhold
18:00.13m0f0xmarcus5 right
18:00.39*** join/#asterisk L|NUX (~linux@202.5.145.58)
18:01.47HoopyCatso i appear to have a number of polycom ip500's which may, indeed, not be SIP.  is there any way to convert those to SIP?
18:02.28crash3mHoopyCat: upgrade their firmware
18:03.04HoopyCatcrash3m:  i'm trying to feed them sip.ld, but they seem to be running out of space and barfing
18:03.22crash3mwhich version of firmware are you using?
18:03.26ManxPowerHoopyCat: Polycom told me that you cannot convert from one protocol to another on their phones, but I'm pretty sure I've heard (either here or on the mailinglist) that people have done so.
18:03.48ManxPowerHoopyCat: upgrade the bootrom first.
18:04.46HoopyCati'm aiming for SIP 1.3.1.0056 it seems
18:05.00*** join/#asterisk bannerman (~bannerman@209.216.176.43)
18:05.06dsfrScenario - Call comes in.  My phone receives the callers callerid.  I transfer to another internal extension.  I would like to preserve the original caller's callerid to the person I am transferring.  How do I accomplish this?
18:06.04*** join/#asterisk doughecka_ (~Tad@doughecka.user)
18:06.09ManxPowerdsfr: "show application dial"  Pay special attention to the "o" option.
18:06.18dsfrthx
18:07.59HoopyCati think i may be able to do something with this.  thanks.  :-)
18:08.00PBXtechisnt there a 3rd party app that does better conference calling, had a link and i lost it
18:09.10ManxPower~google site:lists.digium.com meetme2 OR app_conference
18:09.44PBXtechwasnt an * product thou.
18:09.48HoopyCatnow damned if i can find software upgrades... *rummages*
18:10.08tzangerManxPower: was the TDM400P patch a 220nF cap between pins 1 and 20, 2 and 20 or 19 and 20?
18:10.30ManxPowertzanger: I have not had a tech onsite during non-business hours yet.
18:10.43bkw_ManxPower, qualify=yes isn't a global option in sip.conf
18:10.46tzangeroh I thought you fixed a TDM400P by hand
18:10.47bkw_just to let you know it was never one.
18:11.07ManxPowertzanger: No.  That's the job of the company that makes the board. 8-)
18:11.27bkw_it's not even in the sample config to be a global option.
18:11.48tzangerManxPower: pins 1 and 20 I think
18:12.03PBXtechbkw wernt you talking about a differenct (non *) conference server a long while back?
18:12.52bkw_PBXtech, no its asterisk
18:12.57bkw_but not meetme
18:13.02bkw_and not app_conference
18:13.12PBXtechwhat was it, thought i bookmarked it
18:14.27bkw_its not out in the wild
18:14.29bkw_we have it caged up
18:15.05*** join/#asterisk beamerBob (~none@bi01p1.nc.us.ibm.com)
18:15.09PBXtechdidnt you send me to a url about it? swear there was a web site. i was wanting to try it out
18:15.24bkw_no #996 runs it
18:15.43*** join/#asterisk shido6 (~shido@d57-87-253.home.cgocable.net)
18:16.00PBXtechwhat is that chan
18:17.28jabbzyhello.  is there a setting in sip.conf that mirrors the functionality of "outbound proxy" ??
18:18.43ManxPowerjabbzy: The concept of an outbound proxy doesn't really exist for Asterisk.  If by "outbound proxy" you mean "send all calls to this device", since you control where you send calls in extensions.conf
18:20.19Nuggetit's possible to make asterisk behave that way, but doing so will make both you and asterisk grumpy.
18:20.28beamerBobHello, can anyone explain why pbx_exec is keeping separate stacks?
18:20.37jabbzyManx, thanks for getting back - no i am trying to setup a trunk to talk to a voip => pstn provider.  Everything works ok inbound, and works in/out if i set it direct to an ATA.  I have to put in however to get the inbound working the following into "outbound proxy" field, nat.provider.org:5065
18:21.54*** join/#asterisk m0f0x (m0f0x@m0f0x.user)
18:22.28ManxPowerjabbzy: put the provider in as a peer in sip.conf, then Dial(SIP/1234@provideraslistedinsip.conf)
18:23.01ManxPowerwhere host=nat.provider.org and port=5065 in the [provider] section.
18:25.07jabbzySounds like a plan - back in a mo...
18:25.10jabbzy(testing)
18:25.17bkw_did ManxPower put me on his ignore list?
18:25.28bjohnsonlikely
18:25.48bkw_bet so too
18:25.50bkw_dork
18:26.19outtolunchahah
18:26.22outtolunc<PROTECTED>
18:26.32outtoluncnice warning <G>
18:26.57bkw_thats rich
18:27.04bkw_about as funny as the "I should never be called"
18:27.59denonbkw: my favorite is, "Something happened here that neither you or I should be proud of"
18:28.03HoopyCatwoo!  loading application.
18:29.08*** join/#asterisk DannyF (~dannyf@h197n2fls32o865.telia.com)
18:31.11jabbzyback... well thats broke my outgoing :)
18:31.20HoopyCatBOOYAH!  who's my daddy?  crash3m and ManxPower are my daddy!
18:32.38*** join/#asterisk Cassador (cass@bl4-186-222.dsl.telepac.pt)
18:32.44crash3m:)
18:32.46CassadorSalute Gents
18:33.15*** join/#asterisk nextime (~nextime@213-140-6-96.fastres.net)
18:34.18ManxPowerHoopyCat: What suggestion of mine worked?
18:36.01*** join/#asterisk doughecka_ (~Tad@doughecka.user)
18:37.50*** join/#asterisk Goshen (~Goshen@67-40-107-29.slkc.qwest.net)
18:39.46bochisnt there a special variable of the ip address of the user?
18:40.06ManxPowerboch: If there is it would be listed in docs/README.variables
18:40.43bochim asking cause it is not listed
18:41.14*** join/#asterisk bryan05 (~bryan05@65.116.170.6)
18:41.37cursor<bkw_> did ManxPower put me on his ignore list?
18:41.47cursorEveryone's on ManxPower's ignore list
18:42.38bochmaybe i could use ${SIPDOMAIN} but what for iax and oh323?
18:44.00ManxPowercursor: Yes.  I hot tired of being told to Shut Up! (c) 2005, bkw_
18:44.06ManxPowergot tired, even
18:44.28cursorShut up :-)
18:44.40cursorhaha
18:44.59ManxPowercursor: I think it was yesterday I took him off my /ignore list and the first thing I saw from him was "ManxPower: Shut up!", so I put him back on the ignore list.
18:45.17bochlol
18:45.24cursorok
18:46.08ManxPower*most* of the time I remember to uncheck "ignore private messages too".
18:48.03bochManxPower i need the client IP in my AGI script, do you know how can i do?
18:48.03cursorbrb...
18:49.23ManxPowerboch: no
18:50.37bochok, np
18:51.39*** join/#asterisk simplex3 (~simplex3@64-136-207-22-dhcp-kc.everestkc.net)
18:54.07simplex3I'm having issues with Agents and Queues
18:54.47simplex3I can get agents logged in (show agents) but when I do a "show queues" they never show any available agents.
18:55.12simplex3I have each queue defined with "member=Agent/XXX".
18:55.32ManxPowersimplex3: the agents have to log in
18:55.58ManxPowerIf you don't want them to login then use member=Zap/1 or member=SIP/123 or whatever.
18:56.33simplex3I'd prefer they have to login.
18:56.59*** join/#asterisk cjk (~cjk@80.92.75.120)
18:57.14simplex3By "login" do you mean send them through AgentCallbackLogin?
18:57.20ManxPowersimplex3: show application agentlogin or showapplication agentcallbacklogin
18:57.48simplex3exten => *60,1,AgentCallbackLogin(|${CALLERIDNUM}@is-extensions)
18:58.26simplex3When they hit *60 they log in, and I run "show agents" at the CLI and it shows them as logged in, but "show queues" still shows 0 agents available.
18:58.36ManxPowersimplex3: At least in 1.0.x people using agentcallbacklogin cannot transfer the call on a Polycom phone.  I don't know if it happens in other situations.
19:02.14simplex3So let me be sure I understand.  I define an agent in agents.conf, it obviously works because they can log in and I can see them in the CLI.  I define that Agent as a "member=Agent/XXX" in the queue(s) that I want them to take calls in.  After they log in, I should be able to see them listed in "show queues", right?
19:02.59simplex3Or is there some other step I need to take in extensions.conf to get a logged in agent into a queue?
19:03.20HeadachesAboundlyrics-louie-louie...what the?!
19:08.37*** kick/#asterisk [ManxPower!~bkw_@bkw.developer.and.friend.of.asterisk] by bkw_ (FUCK YOU)
19:09.13bkw_he goes around saying shit thats half true
19:09.16bkw_and I point it out
19:09.18bkw_and i'm the asshole
19:09.19bkw_fuck him
19:09.35simplex3So what part of what he was telling me was the true half?
19:09.37darwin35bkw is no asshole he is my bitch
19:09.57bkw_well he tells people things that are not right.. or based on his opinion of how things work
19:10.02bkw_you can just ask anyone
19:10.02*** join/#asterisk stefanocarlini (~stefanoca@213.233.11.14)
19:10.10*** join/#asterisk MajestiK (~MajestiK@S01060800208687ec.ed.shawcable.net)
19:10.58simplex3bkw: Did you see my queue issue?  Sounds like you've been around, I'm sure I'm missing something simple but I can't find any clear docs on the subject.
19:11.31tzangerI have to say I'm trying to figure out what he's saying that's half true
19:11.36HeadachesAboundbkw, what is your opinion of realtime?
19:11.38darwin35simplex queues are easy
19:11.53simplex3darwin35: That's what I thought.
19:12.16simplex3For some reason I can't get a logged in agent to actually take calls in a queue they are listed as a member of.
19:12.19darwin35give me a min I will show you a simple queue I use for techsupport
19:12.59*** join/#asterisk jjhall (~chatzilla@24-119-114-94.cpe.cableone.net)
19:13.29bkw_tzanger, he tells people that "stable" is what they should use.. and stable is never the right answer for alot of people
19:13.35bkw_and stable is not what I call stable
19:13.38*** join/#asterisk santiago (~santiago@63.245.86.227)
19:13.49tzangerbkw_: well for better or worse that is what Mark called it
19:13.56HeadachesAboundi tried stable once, couldn't get it working.
19:13.56bkw_its feature stable
19:13.57tzangermaybe "froze" is a better term
19:13.58bkw_thats it
19:14.05bkw_release would ahve been a better word
19:14.10tzangerthere ya go
19:14.12tzangerrelease
19:14.28bkw_but when I told him to shut up he was in the process of telling someone to use stable.. and he wouldn't listen to me
19:14.43bkw_anyway i'm thru with the stupid bullshit
19:15.13Nuggetonly the smart bullshit from here on out.
19:15.56*** join/#asterisk makhtar (~ageller@mail.bulletinnews.com)
19:16.11bkw_well i'm just thru with it.. if he comes back i'll just have to ingore him
19:16.48bkw_well having some problems running cvs-head without being informed of issues causes people to go on and on about how bad it is
19:16.52bkw_when infact its not
19:16.52darwin35I owe bkw the world he helped me the most when I first got started on * and has been there since. I stand by my man
19:17.02bkw_darwin35, thanks ;)
19:17.47HeadachesAboundi hope i'm not on bkw_ ignore, cause I tried stable once and couldn't get it working, so i pulled down head and have had no issues since.
19:18.13*** join/#asterisk ManxPower (~eric@dsl-209-16-67-160.datasync.com)
19:18.15bkw_haha
19:18.20my007mshello any one know good softphone sip and iax work in linux
19:18.41bkw_I think i'm PMS'ing today
19:18.48tzangerthey each have their issues
19:19.08tzanger'stable's issues, though, are much more ... known?  they don't change as much
19:19.15*** join/#asterisk |Vulture| (~V@95.236.204.68.cfl.res.rr.com)
19:19.18*** join/#asterisk focks (~craig@nsc66.147.95-93.newsouth.net)
19:19.20tzangerand ManxPower had you on ignore, he was tired of being told to shut up
19:19.44tzangerso ignoring each other won't quite work because neither one of you can see the other
19:19.45*** join/#asterisk vaewyn (freeman@mail.parrishmachine.com)
19:22.14bkw_haha
19:22.19bkw_I don't ignore people
19:22.26bkw_I don't have anyone on my ignore
19:22.34*** join/#asterisk [hC] (~hardcore@8.10.2.4)
19:23.05HeadachesAboundlots-o-monkeys
19:23.37vaewynbkw_: maybe not your IRC clients ignore but... the one in your head...  ;P
19:24.14HeadachesAboundlyrics-louie-louie
19:25.14*** join/#asterisk docelm0 (~docelm0@67.106.194.90.ptr.us.xo.net)
19:25.22bkw_vaewyn, maybe?
19:25.43m0f0xOh, shit.... I just forgot to install pwlib & openh323 on my box
19:25.46m0f0x:/
19:25.48bkw_haha
19:26.13m0f0x<- newbie is a disgrace ;)
19:26.27bkw_unless you're doing h323 you don't need it
19:26.42HeadachesAboundtt-monkeys
19:26.46m0f0xbkw_, that's the point, I'll be doing H323, hehe
19:26.46*** join/#asterisk BeBrA (~abc@host162-247.pool8248.interbusiness.it)
19:26.49BeBrAhello
19:27.41ManxPowertzanger: I asked bkw_ to put me on his /ignore
19:28.03m0f0xbkw_, But, just to make sure, If I'll use H323, do I need to pass any parameter when I'm running the configure command on Asterisk source?
19:28.42*** join/#asterisk Zipper_32 (~none@s207-6-25-182.bc.hsia.telus.net)
19:29.03*** part/#asterisk Zipper_32 (~none@s207-6-25-182.bc.hsia.telus.net)
19:30.52*** join/#asterisk jief- (~jief@modemcable196.182-80-70.mc.videotron.ca)
19:31.06jief-hey guys, is it possible to use another mp3 player other than mpg123 for MoH?
19:31.10HeadachesAboundopinions on the stability of realtime?
19:31.11firestrmomg this is painful.. its like waiting for grass to grow..
19:31.22firestrmstill no nufone credit..
19:32.26jontowjief; i'd dump mp3 entirely if you've got the disk space.. use rawplayer.c
19:32.29HeadachesAboundNugget's package was re-routed thru the plural quadrants
19:32.42jontowjust takes a raw audio stream and shoves it over the pipe; meaning no transcoding, no decoding, little to nothing for overhead
19:32.46jontowits just more data/bandwidth
19:33.08firestrmwould it be that hard for them to process credits within 72h?
19:33.27vaewynok... why on earth with secret=blah on both ends peer and user... I still get "socket_read: Host 143.207.1.72 failed to authenticate as voiped-londo"   but without the secret lines it works fine?
19:33.47vaewynarrgh... evil machines
19:33.48vaewynhehehe
19:33.55firestrmeven my bank is faster, and my bank sucks..
19:34.08cjkis it possible over iax to send text-msgs. so that 2 compatible clients could do instant messanging over iax?
19:34.56vaewyncjk: yes it is possible...  no noone has written it yet  :P
19:35.15filethe stuff is in asterisk
19:35.20cjkvaewyn: on the asterisk side or on the client side
19:35.20filewell, some of it
19:35.36filebetween IAX clients it simply forwards the text frame, and it's up to the client to handle it (you have to be in a call)
19:35.56filefor others... I'm not getting into it
19:35.59cjkfile: well being in the call is not so good
19:36.33bjohnsonvaewyn: lots of reasons
19:36.59vaewynbjohnson: I figured it out...  bad password in the Dial line
19:37.14bjohnsonyuck .. password in the Dial
19:37.15vaewynyou know though... if you are registered wth should you need the password in the Dial?
19:37.28vaewynand I am registered
19:37.35bjohnsonbecause register means something different than what you assume it means
19:37.39fileI have experimental stuff for messaging :) I need to shape it up more
19:37.41filebut it's nice
19:37.46vaewynwithout pass though it screws up
19:37.53bjohnsonregister does not mean you are authorized
19:38.06bjohnsonyou have just "registered" your IP
19:38.28vaewynbjohnson: why should it... I am telling the other end where I am... and I have to use a password to do it... so why can't it use that relationship to authenitcate a call
19:38.39darwin35normaly register means you register with the provider to send calls but with sip its to get calls
19:38.48vaewynor is there a better way to get the password out of the dial?
19:38.50darwin35confuse the fuck out  me
19:39.06bjohnsonvaewyn: you can put the password in the iax.conf
19:39.16bjohnsonthere is a good page about iax authentication on the wiki
19:39.23vaewynbjohnson: it is... and it ain't working that way
19:39.34bjohnsonvaewyn: then something else is wrong
19:39.45vaewynboth use and peer entries on both sides have   secret=blah
19:39.53vaewynregisters fine...  denises calls
19:39.56vaewyndenies even
19:40.08vaewynif I take all the secret lines out works fine
19:40.25vaewynwhich confuses the @#$#@$ outta me :P
19:40.32*** join/#asterisk blitzrage (~blitzrage@blitzrage.documenter.extraordinaire.of.asterisk)
19:41.13*** join/#asterisk UdontKnow (evaldo@udontknow.staff.freenode)
19:42.16darwin35cvshead is broken
19:42.28vaewynwhich part?
19:42.40darwin35asterisk.c
19:42.50MikeJ[Laptop]in many ways... just look at the bug tracker :)
19:42.55firestrmwhat it wont compole?
19:42.55vaewyncompiled fine for me about 35 minutes ago
19:42.57darwin35cli_complete causes a segfaul in gcc
19:43.00firestrmer compile..
19:43.16vaewynAsterisk CVS-HEAD-05/11/05-14:48:20 built by root@londo
19:43.17vaewyn:}
19:43.24vaewynok... almost an hour... but still
19:43.46blitzragethis could all be easily solved by looking at the cvs mailing list ;)
19:44.00firestrmor not using head..
19:44.06bjohnsonvaewyn: likely you have a iax.conf entry for "guests"
19:44.18bjohnsonvaewyn: find and read the iax authentication wiki page
19:44.44vaewynbjohnson: yes I do... but it sends all calls to a 'you suck' playback extension :P
19:44.50vaewynand that didn't happen
19:45.12vaewynfirestrm: some people actually develop for * and thus need to be on -head :P
19:45.17ManxPowerblitzrage: SO many things could easily be solved by looking at the asterisk-cvs mailing list.
19:45.42firestrmvaewyn, lol.. just pointing out the blindingly obvious :P
19:45.53vaewyn:}
19:46.06darwin35I have yseterdays build still
19:46.11darwin35so I am safe
19:46.14vaewynmy theory is... don't complain on -head unless you can fix it  ;P
19:46.24ManxPowerPeople should be required to provide their e-mail address before downloading CVS-HEAD and the system should check to see if they are on the asterisk-cvs mailing list or not.
19:46.28vaewynon stable... complain away :P
19:46.54darwin35I use head for dev
19:46.57vaewynManxPower: You are assuming the people like getting that much @#$@#$ in their email
19:47.00darwin35of a project
19:47.17vaewynManxPower: some people liek to just browse the archives when they need to :}
19:47.24NuxiYou can't complain about stable, you're not using the latest code.  You can't complain on the latest code, because it is not stable.
19:47.26ManxPowerSigh.  Summer has arrived.  The tap water is warm
19:47.30firestrmManxPower, im not on the mailing list because even though i had it delivered digent, i still get pounded 10 times a day with listmail.. digest to me means one.. once a day..
19:47.39AgiNamuNuxi, damn straight. you can't complain. any questions? ;)
19:47.59NuxiI just XOR the two together so that I can complain.
19:48.05ManxPowerfirestrm: the asterisk-cvs mailing list is ONLY messages of changes to Asterisk
19:48.11NuxiIt never compiles.
19:48.24*** join/#asterisk bannerman (~bannerman@209.216.176.42)
19:48.27vaewynNuxi: no... You can't complain about missing features in stable... and you can't complain about bugs in -head... :P
19:48.41AgiNamudoes anyone want to work on SuperFastEAGI with me?
19:48.46ManxPowerIts pretty obvious that the prevailing attitude is that you should not use Asterisk unless you are a developer.
19:48.53darwin35you have bugs in your head? man time to call terminex
19:49.04NuxiSuperFastEAGI?
19:49.18AgiNamuyea. i.e., pass voice data over the network and do ASR with it
19:49.39AgiNamui just dont understand AGI right now. Specifically, i dont understand the part of creating the new process.
19:50.04AgiNamuI read the man page for fork(), but dont unstand why a CreateProcess() equivalent isn't used. yes, i dont understand linux.
19:50.28AgiNamufork() and execv seem like... wasteful
19:50.47blitzragecan someone explain to me what "hint" does?
19:51.04NuxiThe agi must run in it's own process.  If using fastagi, it already exists, but for normal agi, a process must be created.
19:51.33AgiNamubut fork creates a copy of the current process
19:51.44AgiNamuisn't there anyting like Win32's CreateProcess()?
19:51.52AgiNamusomethng like system()
19:52.29NuxiI suppose somebody could link wine into the mess so that windows programmers could feel at home... lol
19:52.50AgiNamui just dont understand why you call fork() since that duplicates the current process
19:52.54anthmwhen you exec in unix you replace the forked process with the new one you called exec on so you no longer have the forked copy it is over
19:53.08AgiNamuthat's like, the normal way of doing things?
19:53.10jabbzyhint in essence (as I understand it) makes astersik tell all the other phones about one phones status
19:53.20AgiNamufork() then execv()
19:53.37anthmthere is a family of exec* functions so any of them
19:53.51AgiNamuyea im reading thru man pages
19:54.02AgiNamuso thats the best way to spawn a process then eh
19:54.09AgiNamuwell, then i guess it's just a different approach :P
19:54.27anthmits the same thing that happens every time you type a command including when you executed man fork
19:54.34AgiNamuoh ok
19:54.59AgiNamuSo it's probably not much to enable FastAGI to send audio data
19:55.02Juggieanyone see ast_waitstream: Unexpected control subclass '-1' before?
19:55.04AgiNamujust open another socket and write there ?
19:55.17fileanthm: ooh getting personal
19:55.59AgiNamuactually
19:56.07AgiNamuIt'd probably be better to allow AGI to have a new comamnd
19:56.17blitzragenevermind, found hint on the wiki :)
19:56.17AgiNamuSEND AUDIO <address>
19:56.23blitzragewho'd a thunk it!
19:56.34firestrmthis sucks..
19:56.39Juggienufone down?
19:56.55firestrmJuggie, no just not processing credits..
19:57.02AgiNamuAGI has no authentication system eh?
19:57.16*** join/#asterisk gmcinnes (~gmcinnes@70.50.123.69)
19:57.25Juggieyah you think you have problems... i have to deal with isa 2004 for creating a DMZ for asterisk
19:57.27AgiNamuI guess i can do that by restricting allowed IPs to my asterisk box
19:57.28Juggierun by useless admins
19:57.37anthmfor a guy with agi in his nick you sure have a lot of agi questions lol
19:57.38AgiNamuISA is easy to use.... in my experience.
19:57.43Juggiethey fucked it up so bad today, they have to uninstall isa and reinstall it
19:57.45gmcinneshi all.  Anyone know of a voice xml stack that can sit on top of asteisk?
19:57.53Juggiethe database got currupt somehow with two people runing the management console at once
19:57.54AgiNamuAgiNamu comes from korean actually... nothing to do with AGI :P
19:57.58firestrmJuggie, LOL!! been there done that..
19:58.04AgiNamuWell, i want to write a VXML browser for Asterisk
19:58.15AgiNamuand I figure that wrting FastEAGI is the first step
19:58.20Juggiefirestrm, i was so close to having everything working, rtp needed to be fixed... it was only going one way, but then boom...
19:58.21Juggiesigh
19:58.22gmcinnesYeah, me too.  But not if there's something out there I can use
19:58.42Juggieiax was working... but its down again now...
19:58.45NuxiAgiNamu, have you tried to write a recorded wave to a file and seeing if your ASR can decipher it?
19:58.56AgiNamuSo, does anyone have any input then? Adding "SEND AUDIO <address>" to AGI?
19:59.05AgiNamuNuxi, that's later :P
19:59.22AgiNamuI plan on using Sphinx and Nuance
19:59.27gmcinnesAgiNamu: how so?
19:59.29NuxiActually, that may save you a lot of work.  A quick test of the ASR might change your mind on using it.
19:59.52AgiNamuyea, i might stick to Nuance
19:59.59AgiNamuthe thing is, for any system, I need to get the audio out of asterisk
20:00.02AgiNamuand controlled by my system
20:00.23AgiNamugmcinnes, you send the SEND AUDIO command specifying an address. Then Asterisk will start sending audio to that address.
20:00.24NuxiDo a simple RECORD FILE and see if Nuance can decode it acurrately.
20:00.36AgiNamuNuxi, you don't think Nuance works?
20:00.50AgiNamuhell, I can shoot it off and have MS ASR take a shot at it :P
20:01.23NuxiAll I'm saying is that a quick test might save you hours of coding.
20:01.38AgiNamuwell, i wont code for any specific ASR until I've tested it :P
20:01.50AgiNamuRight now this is all still very generic and GPL stuff
20:02.24*** join/#asterisk jcollie (~jcollie@lt16586.campus.dmacc.edu)
20:02.43anthmsending what audio ?
20:02.52AgiNamuthe audio from a call
20:02.55AgiNamulike EAGI does
20:03.26AgiNamuHave you used Nuance?
20:03.29NuxiIf you find otherwise, you will be my hero for life!
20:04.12JuggieNuxi, ummm... you might want to double check your facts there.
20:04.18Juggieany phone call you make ever
20:04.23Juggieas long as its over a decent distance
20:04.27Juggieis in ulaw, or worse
20:04.51NuxiI'd be happy if someone would prove me wrong.
20:04.52AgiNamuNuxi, have you tried MS Speech Server? I've heard great things about it's accuracy.
20:04.59AgiNamuWhich ones have you tried?
20:05.09AgiNamuSphinx, i wouldn't expect much. its not a commercial telephony product
20:05.21Juggieits not ulaw that affects the voice rec, its the latency etc
20:05.23ManxPowerCepstral is the best TTS system for $30
20:05.32AgiNamuTTS... but ASR
20:05.32NuxiI have tried MS speech api, sphinx2, sphinx4, HTK and a dozen other small ones.
20:05.51AgiNamuNuxi, MS Speech-- SAPI 5? not SAPI 6 with Speech server
20:05.57JuggieNuxi, you have to get a big name commercial product, if you want accuracy
20:06.01AgiNamuhuge difference, since Speech Server was optimized for telephony
20:06.08Juggienuonce advertises like 95% accuracy
20:06.47anthmhire stenographers with headsets
20:07.10NuxiApparently it's trivial and I'm a moron.
20:07.22AgiNamuyou mean steganalists
20:07.44jcollienah, don't hire stenographers... outsource it to India
20:07.48AgiNamuBut you haven't tried Nuance? I'm really interested in hearing other people's results.
20:08.07*** join/#asterisk tld (~tld@80.203.70.227)
20:08.14AgiNamujcollie... yea, screw this whole IVR thing :P
20:08.39Juggieagi, does nuance have anything for non windows os?
20:08.46AgiNamuSolaris
20:08.50AgiNamubut i dont care if it's windows.
20:08.55AgiNamuthat's what FastEAGI is for
20:09.16AgiNamui'll run my AGI scripts on one machine
20:09.20AgiNamurun ASR on another
20:09.28AgiNamuand Asterisk on another
20:09.41AgiNamuI'd like tofigure how to patch in TTS as well
20:09.46Juggiewell we have nuonce servers, if you figure it out, let me know :)
20:09.48AgiNamuNOT running on the asterisk machine
20:10.15AgiNamui have no idea how nuance works. im making a huge assumption that ASR takes in audio and spits out results
20:10.51Juggiethey have an api for it
20:10.54Juggiei'm not sure either
20:10.58Juggiesomeone else here does the nuance work
20:10.59Juggienot me
20:11.10*** join/#asterisk cursor (~kevin@andromeda.office.cursor.biz)
20:11.20cursoroops
20:11.27Juggiei know hes written some ivr's in java on top of nuance's api and they support some telephony boards, as well as sip
20:11.33Juggieso his nuance client connects to asterisk for sip
20:12.38*** join/#asterisk Cheng29 (~cheng29@d57-87-253.home.cgocable.net)
20:14.38cursorSlippery stuff, that Java
20:18.54gmcinnesso no-one knows of an open voice xml library?
20:19.03bkw_OpenVXL
20:19.10bkw_or some shit like that
20:19.11bkw_go google
20:19.14bkw_its out there
20:19.39fileI need food
20:19.59cursorDamn
20:20.04gmcinnesbkw_ Thx. Other people have told me its out there too, but I can't find it.
20:20.04cursorWhy does that never work
20:20.05cursor:-)
20:20.09gmcinnes*I'll go hunting
20:20.14bkw_gmcinnes, check sf.net
20:20.28gmcinnesbkw_: good idea
20:20.46filebkw_: I just rewrote my dialplan and made it cleaner... so if you do an ext and forward it here, it *SHOULD* work
20:21.05*** join/#asterisk MattH (~matth@noc-wireless.chilitech.net)
20:21.13fileshould being a key word
20:21.18MattHHi... I hear there is a rumor that someone here may know what's going on with broadvoice?
20:21.37cursorOpenVXI
20:21.53JuggieMattH, why whats going on?
20:21.57vaewynMattH: beyond 'They suck'  most people here have no clue  :}
20:22.01cursorFound on Google: "open source" voice xml
20:22.15MattHyeah they suck big... I'm canceling
20:22.20seancursor: only for CAPI
20:22.44*** join/#asterisk SuperN (SuperN@28stb35.codetel.net.do)
20:22.57vaewynI'd offer to have JerJer's children...  but that's just wrong
20:23.06cursorok - I have no use for voice recognition anyway
20:23.12cursor"Press 1 for..." is good enough for me
20:23.16cursorI don't even use that
20:23.17cursor:-)
20:23.45vaewynHeh... yeah... IVRs at max... voice recognition just equals pain and more servers :P
20:23.45SuperNhello everyone!
20:23.46ManxPowerIt looks like Polycom SIP firmware 1.5.1 supports disableing call waiting.  At leas that's how I read "11552: Added phone UI and web interface configuration support for lineKeys and callsPerLineKey"
20:23.58SuperNin order to use H323 with asterisk do I need a GateKeeper?
20:24.00*** join/#asterisk BulgTech (~BulgTech@CPE0050f2cd217f-CM00e06f24168a.cpe.net.cable.rogers.com)
20:24.32vaewynManxPower: Sweeet... been waiting for that at one site...  had been using * to enforce it so far
20:24.47BulgTechhello
20:25.04ManxPowervaewyn: I have as well.
20:25.10Juggiehmmm anyone have an account on the wiki (i dont) someone stuck a logo for a company on the bottom of the main page
20:25.16ManxPowerIt's the only IP phone that *I* know of that doesn't support it.
20:25.18vaewynwonder when they are gonna open up the microbrowser on the IP500 as well
20:25.33vaewyncause that in the 600 rocks
20:25.47ManxPowerYou can read the release notes (no login required) at polycom.com but you can't actually GET the firmware, of course.
20:26.20*** part/#asterisk Balu (~balu@foghorn.bartels-schoene.de)
20:26.28vaewynI have access to the firmware...  am in conversations with one of the polycom engineers
20:26.34BulgTechI was pointed to this channel by the asterisk website
20:26.45ManxPowervaewyn: GIMME GIMME GIMME!!!!!
20:26.53AgiNamuBulgTech, pointing is rude.
20:27.02vaewynManxPower: hehehe
20:27.11BulgTechAgiNamu, blame it on asterisk
20:27.17vaewynOnly when I get what I want... then I don't care about my relationship with them anymore :P
20:27.20ManxPower~docs
20:27.21jbotDocumentation can be found at http://digium.com/index.php?menu=documentation or http://www.digium.com/handbook-draft.pdf or #asterisk-doc, or http://www.voip-info.org/wiki-Asterisk, or http://www.asteriskdocs.org
20:27.32ManxPowervaewyn: well, the wiki points to a place to get it too.
20:27.36*** join/#asterisk focks (~craig@nsc66.147.95-93.newsouth.net)
20:27.38ManxPowerIt's just usually a few weeks begind
20:27.43ManxPower..er..behind.
20:27.51vaewynManxPower: Yeah... I have newer than that
20:27.53ManxPowerI can't deploy it until I get back from my trip anyway.
20:28.21vaewynHey... anyone worked on SIMPLE yet?
20:28.30ManxPowerMy new classes are in.  I'll be a Hip Geek now!
20:28.35vaewynthought I saw mention but havn't seen any patches
20:28.35ManxPower*sigh*
20:28.36fockswhat would cause me to get sometimes get "if you'd like to make a call, please hang up and try again" when dialing 7 digit numbers from my SIP phone and other times it works fine?
20:28.41ManxPowerMy new GLASSES are in.  I'll be a Hip Geek now!
20:28.45vaewynManxPower: hahaha
20:29.08ManxPowerfocks: a slow telco.  Put a "w" in your dial line
20:29.16*** join/#asterisk makkia (~pippo@host16-50.pool8250.interbusiness.it)
20:29.19makkiahello
20:29.22ManxPowervaewyn: my current ones are 13 years olf
20:29.30vaewynegads
20:29.44ManxPowervaewyn: maybe 15 years old
20:29.49BulgTechI'm actually looking for a modem voice messaging software, any ideas
20:29.50darwin35ok time for everyone to take a nap and chill out
20:29.53makkiaexist a list of best ISDN BRI interfaces for asterisk ?
20:29.54focksManxPower you mean every time I dial or is there a way to insert that automatically?
20:30.00SuperNanyone has experience using H323 phone based in the chip PA1688?
20:30.02vaewynerrgghh... You know... voipsupply had given me another URL for the firmware... now I can't find it   :{
20:30.28vaewynWould be nice to hand that one out :P
20:32.22ManxPowerfocks: I mean like exten => 9NXXXXXX,1,Dial(Zap/1/w${EXTEN:1})
20:32.25vaewynHmm... google needs an email appliance :}  just like their search box but a local gmail server :}
20:32.30focksManxPower gotcha
20:32.31focksthanks
20:34.26*** join/#asterisk Seyr (~Seyr@rrcs-24-227-133-226.sw.biz.rr.com)
20:34.42Seyrheyas people
20:34.50ManxPowerThe new lawyer sounds so gay.
20:35.25jontow:P
20:35.52SeyrIf my * server is not behind a firewall and my X-Lite is and my audio cuts out halfway through sentences, what can I do to fix this?
20:35.58jontowand now it rains..
20:36.14SeyrIf I connect to BroadVoice from the same X-Lite, I dont have this problem. Only when I connect to my * server
20:36.14jontowseyr; use a tighter codec or get more bandwidth
20:36.39jontowget out tcpdump, ethereal, or your favorite sniffer and watch the traffic
20:36.41ManxPowerI'm trying to unload/reload chan_sip.so and the lawyers are always on the phone.
20:36.42SeyrJontow: bandwidth is not an issue
20:36.47jontowok.
20:37.55shido6.
20:38.03makkiaexist a list of best ISDN BRI interfaces for asterisk ?
20:38.09Seyrif I use DIAX, it works fine. If I use X-Lite, audio cuts out
20:38.11*** join/#asterisk BeBrA (~abc@host162-247.pool8248.interbusiness.it)
20:38.31ManxPower~google site:lists.digium.com best BRI
20:40.34BeBrAanyone with gomemeeting?
20:40.50bkw_Remember guys cluecon registrations is Open.. if you're interested www.cluecon.com
20:41.14fileWe'd be happy to have you all attend!
20:41.17darwin35www.bkw.get-aclue-con.com
20:41.25bkw_haha
20:41.32fileCome meet the brilliant minds behind everything, and learn how to make your asterisk dreams come true
20:41.38*** join/#asterisk kietlak (~kietlak@11-mo3-6.acn.waw.pl)
20:41.45bkw_its like disney land really
20:41.51fileindeed
20:41.52cpatryfile: you're talking about me here? :P
20:41.54darwin35fire file and bkw and fork the planet
20:42.02bkw_fork?
20:42.09bkw_I thread.. I don't fork
20:42.25*** part/#asterisk Seyr (~Seyr@rrcs-24-227-133-226.sw.biz.rr.com)
20:42.26bkw_he has child pids
20:42.26bkw_haha
20:42.29fileindeed
20:42.32filebkw is one of them! OMG
20:42.59*** join/#asterisk docE (~docelm0@67.106.194.90.ptr.us.xo.net)
20:43.15darwin35bkw = tough to chew
20:43.27filewhat an understatement!
20:43.51filebut seriously folks, consider going... good investment
20:44.04darwin35file can I share your room
20:44.09darwin35lol
20:44.10fileno :P
20:44.21darwin35biatch
20:45.00*** join/#asterisk jets (~brian@guardian.pmt.org)
20:45.43fileI dunno how my accomodations/airfare/all that is being handled
20:45.48filebut regardless, NO :P
20:46.35jetsOur callcenter manager wants something fairly simple but i'm wnating to make sure i don't reinvent the wheel..
20:47.12jetsHe wants to --- if there are available agents do a queue|r, if no agents available playback (promptsayingwerebusy) then just queue with MOH
20:47.21jetsAGI?
20:47.59filejets: You can do that in dialplan logic
20:48.08HeadachesAboundif the boss would foot the bool, i would be at cluecon.
20:48.08jetshow would i do an if on available agents?
20:48.16HeadachesAboundor the bill even.
20:48.18fileyou don't, there's an argument to Queue
20:48.35fileer wait... what is that
20:49.25fileyou can have them leave the queue when it's empty, that's fine and dandy
20:49.59jetshrm
20:50.23fileit's just putting them back in with MOH, cause the option I mentioned above is configured in queues.conf, it's not an argument you pass to Queue
20:50.25jetsmaybe write my own queue arguement for when all agents are busy to proceed to n+xxx something
20:50.40*** part/#asterisk jabbzy (~dygup@noiseboys.force9.co.uk)
20:50.45filego ahead haha
20:51.10HeadachesAboundyou would have to use custom agent tracking to determine if all agents are busy and then play the message.
20:51.34filejets: I *could* whip something up
20:51.49filebut I'll give you a hint so you can do it
20:52.39filejets: override the leavewhenempty option to keep them in the queue with an argument
20:52.39jetsHeh my coding ability sucks.
20:53.09jetsohhh just copy the same argument and its function to do something else
20:53.16filenot quite
20:53.22filein reality it's maybe a 5 line code change, if that
20:53.37bkw_jets you  hoe
20:53.40bkw_ltns
20:53.43jetsBKW!
20:53.44bkw_how ya been?
20:53.48jetsGreat how are you?
20:53.58filejets... I remember you
20:54.02bkw_haha
20:54.03jets"Sexy!"
20:54.06bkw_how could you forget?
20:54.16jetsI've been great how are you bkw?
20:54.20bkw_excellent
20:54.23bkw_how is harley?
20:54.26bkw_his is bitch friend?
20:54.26jetsfile: hahah I was the easy one to get along with
20:54.26bkw_haha
20:54.37fileanthm: who lost money?!?
20:54.59jetsanthm: when you didn't reply to my email forever till i bugged you again we ended up writing our own
20:55.00bkw_haha
20:55.09anthmBS
20:55.10jets:(
20:55.13bkw_hehe
20:55.21sean(I know this is a stretch, but...) looking for advice on a north-america (US48+Canada) termination at low rate (<1c/min)
20:56.00vaewyn<1c/min is a joke... sorry... unless you are a huge customer no one is gonna come close to that
20:56.12vaewynby huge I mean 100k$/month+
20:56.15*** join/#asterisk r0d3nt (~RatMan@wsip-24-234-241-84.lv.lv.cox.net)
20:56.26seanyeah, like I said.. stretch
20:56.38anthmhow did you write it, a bash script that says CVS update -d
20:56.43blitzragesean: what kind of business, and how many minutes a month?
20:56.44vaewynhehehe... NuFone does 2c/min...  couples others are in that same range
20:57.07seanmy current provider (unlimitel) is sub-1c (1.1c CDN), but only in-network
20:57.09RickTickhello all: anyone using AreskiCC for prepaid billing?
20:57.11*** join/#asterisk Rez (lorez@lorez.staff.freenode) [NETSPLIT VICTIM]
20:57.14ManxPowersean: how mins per month?
20:57.17jetsanthm: Donnn't be so bitter, SORRY =)  We ended up hacking your original chanspy... then we just bought a te410p and wrote an AGI to follow out an agents channel to zapscan.
20:57.18seanblitzrage: low volume.. <1000 mins/month
20:57.24ManxPowersean: HAHAHAHA!
20:57.29ManxPowerYou cheapass
20:57.32seanheh (-:
20:57.44seandid I mention that I didn't really expect to find something? (-;
20:57.45blitzragesean: ahhhh, well, mixnetworks.com does US48+Canada for $22 US unlimited a month
20:57.57ManxPowerYou realize that you are talking about saving like $10/month at the most between 1c/min and 2c/min
20:58.01anthmi'm real bitter cos you offered my $300 towards getting it into CVS nad guess where it is
20:58.09seanManxPower: true.
20:58.18ManxPoweranthm: take it out of cvs 8-)
20:58.35vaewynbwahahaha...  Ok...  want to hear a Norhell joke?  If you connected to a Meridian via NI2 no matter what class or plans they put you in you can't call off the meridian...  If you switch to 5ess pri_net  you can :}
20:58.36blitzragespeaking of cookies, I need food
20:58.39jetsanthm: but it took to long and we were rolling out the callcenter much more quickly :(
20:58.40jetshahaha
20:58.53blitzrageno laughing! there is to be NO FUN in #asterisk
20:59.03file:(
20:59.11seanok, then.. cheap US48+Can (anything below 3c)
20:59.15anthmgood save, but you were last quoted as saying "cool let me put in a PO today"
20:59.22vaewyn"Free willy!!!"
20:59.30MikeJ[Laptop]please don't
20:59.36vaewynbwahaha
20:59.54vaewynsean: Nufone.net
21:00.03fileblitzrage: I really can't believe you have found no girl for yourself
21:00.04vaewyngood call quality and service
21:00.09MikeJ[Laptop]are they accepting customers again
21:00.14vaewynanthm: hahaha  nice
21:00.17vaewynYep
21:00.24seanah, it seems they are!
21:00.25blitzragedamnit... I put a Polycom IP500 behind a FreeBSD NAT box, configured the SIP client on Asterisk with nat=yes and it just worked right away. How the hell am I going to learn anything when it works the first time!
21:00.38blitzragefile: I don't look too much
21:00.41filebah
21:00.43vaewynblitzrage:  :P
21:00.47blitzragefile: too poor and busy working...
21:00.59filepoor poor blitzrage
21:01.05blitzragebut volleyball starts next week, and last summer I found a hot girl to have some fun with :)
21:01.07vaewynblitzrage: heck... I am thinking we should just make nat=yes the default and make those poor snom people turn it off :P
21:01.08seantheir website blows, though
21:01.09*** join/#asterisk clint_ (~clint@snap.helixsystems.com)
21:01.13blitzragelets hope its 2 for 2
21:01.15fileblitzrage: nice
21:01.25vaewynsean: websites don't matter.. their service rocks...
21:01.28blitzragevaewyn: haha :)
21:01.37*** join/#asterisk terrapen (~cjs@fw-01.satx.bikeworld.net)
21:01.57blitzragemost good independent software developers have shitty websites :)
21:02.11blitzragethey write software - they're no gfx artist :)
21:02.23vaewynNuFone decided to put their time where the customer support matters the most... the calls  :}
21:02.24blitzrageinfact, the worse the website, the better the software ;)
21:02.32PBXtechwebsite is a templatemonster template heh
21:03.54fileand it's sexy!
21:04.28blitzragefile: just gotta sit down one day and force yourself to make it, thats what I did. Made the whole thing in about a day or two
21:04.34nwhitWith call parking, how do I return a parked call back to the extension that parked it after the timeout?
21:04.34blitzrageand I suck at making websites
21:04.44blitzragenwhit: should just do it...
21:04.55blitzragenwhit: configured in features.conf I believe
21:05.14blitzrageso what the heck should I be using "hints" for?
21:05.27nwhitblitzrage: it sends it back to the calling context at s,1
21:05.42seanwell, THAT was painless
21:05.45blitzrageI've read about them, but nothing I've read really tells me a whole heck of a lot...
21:05.58AgiNamui hired someone to do design for m
21:06.01nwhitblitzrage: they are notifiers for the buttons on snom phones or other phone that support notifications of active channels
21:06.07AgiNamumy personal site
21:06.16AgiNamui hate doing CSS and HTML. shitty tech.
21:06.35cursor:-)
21:06.52blitzragenwhit: right, thats what everyone keeps saying - that doesn't really tell me what they're used for :)
21:07.04*** join/#asterisk jsharp (~jsharp@65.90.64.82)
21:07.14AgiNamuanyone here ever work with Intrado?
21:07.16blitzrageother than to set an extension number, as opposed to a channel, as busy...
21:09.27nwhitblitzrage:  Ok, so I have some extra buttons with lights on my snom 360.  If I my extension is 100 and the guy next to me is 101 and I want to see when he is on the phone I would do a 101,hint,SIP/101 and set 101 as the destination for the function key in my snom phone, then the light on my phone would light up when he is on the phone
21:09.42*** join/#asterisk darby_t (~tom@dnv129.neoplus.adsl.tpnet.pl)
21:10.56blitzragenwhit: hrmmm...
21:11.06blitzragenwhit: makes sense, must come via NOTIFY messages?
21:12.00blitzrageso as soon as 101,hint,SIP/101 is run, then a NOTIFY is sent to your SNOM, indicating he is busy? How does it know when he is not busy, I suppose the hint is removed when the channel is destroyed ?
21:12.48nwhiti believe that is how it works
21:13.55blitzragehrmmm
21:14.03blitzragewonder that will let me do with a Polycom IP500...
21:14.17blitzrageI have something I need to implement... wonder if using hints is the way to do it...
21:14.29*** part/#asterisk jcollie (~jcollie@lt16586.campus.dmacc.edu)
21:15.02blitzrageif a call is in progress to SIP/1000, and the phone supports multiple connections automatically, does ChanIsAvail() return that SIP/1000 is busy?
21:16.52Juggieanyone know wher to find latest phpagi?
21:17.45Nuxihttp://eder.us/projects/phpagi/phpagi.tgz
21:18.41*** join/#asterisk JmanA9 (~josh@h131.186.40.69.ip.alltel.net)
21:19.31Juggiethanks
21:19.37Juggieis that kept up to latest cvs?
21:20.05NuxiHmmm, here's the story:
21:20.40*** join/#asterisk Mike (~mike@201.138.165.115)
21:20.40Juggiethe phpagi sourceforge page is gone so i dunno whats up with the project
21:20.41NuxiThe owner of phpagi isn't very interested in constant updates.  So every so often I send him the new code.
21:21.07Nuxihttp://phpagi.sourceforge.net/
21:21.38Juggieodd...
21:21.49Juggieit comes up empty in IE here
21:23.02Juggiebut doesnt in firefox
21:23.03Juggiehah
21:23.20JuggieNuxi, are you david?
21:23.24Nuxiyup
21:23.27Juggiecoo.
21:23.33Juggiethanks.
21:24.57Mikeany ideas why i get this error
21:24.58Mikeroot@AsteriskBeach:/lib/modules/2.6.10-5-386 # modprobe zaptel
21:24.58MikeFATAL: Error inserting zaptel (/lib/modules/2.6.10-5-386/misc/zaptel.ko): Invalid module format
21:25.16nwhitblitzrage:  i dunno
21:25.43nwhithas anyone tried to give a adt security system a ata to use as the phone port?
21:26.18nwhitmike:  did you compiler with make linux26?
21:26.25Mikenwhit, yes
21:26.49nwhitmike: have you looked at dmesg?
21:27.10Mikelet me see
21:27.27Mikei think its a bad header problem
21:27.29Mikelet me check
21:28.09shido6damnit
21:28.14bkw_haha
21:28.38shido6i knew I recognized your voice
21:28.43bkw_;)
21:28.45Mikeyes that ws the problem
21:28.54nwhitok
21:28.57shido6i need to get out of this house
21:28.59bkw_shido6, ya the second you told me who you were.. I knew exactly what was up
21:29.05bkw_hehe
21:29.09bkw_I thought.. what
21:29.12bkw_why don't he msg me
21:29.12bkw_haha
21:29.37shido6the idea is to get in as cheaply as possible
21:30.03shido6and if i need to get on the stage and strut my stuff then so be it
21:30.09fileshido6: so yeah, interrupt our conference to talk to you :P
21:31.16shido6i think i owe it to the world to get the frog off the puter today
21:31.54shido6ppl keep eating toll free numbers
21:32.04shido6so I have to throw more in the db it sux
21:33.01clint_Hi folks.  I'm having Q.931 woes.  Anyone have experience - carrier is sending a PROGRESS message with a cause code of User Busy rather than a DISCONNECT message.  Any ideas?
21:33.14*** join/#asterisk makhtar (~ageller@mail.bulletinnews.com)
21:34.27*** join/#asterisk Bicster (~Bicster@bicster.user)
21:34.43Bicsterdoes TDMoE work these days?  Or is it still a great way to crash your box?
21:35.15*** join/#asterisk makhtar (~ageller@mail.bulletinnews.com)
21:35.30*** part/#asterisk Patrick^ (~patrickm@pc-0-34.mountaincable.net)
21:36.28BicsterTDMoE is that popular, eh?
21:36.58outtoluncmust be
21:37.03jjhallWhat is the difference between "stop gracefully" and "stop when convenient"?  Wouldn't they both wait for call volume to stop and shut down?
21:37.25nwhithas anyone tried to give a adt security system an ata to use as the phone port?
21:37.39nwhitAnd... with call parking, how do I return a parked call back to the extension that parked it after the timeout?
21:37.48jjhallnwhit: No, but I imagine it would work as well as a satellite reciever, as in not at all.
21:37.50mutilatordidn't work when i tried, but it was over a wireless connection
21:37.57clint_nwhit: Depends on the communicator mode being used by the system and the codec in use.
21:38.07mutilatori've gotten dialup and some other modem communications to work tho
21:38.07Bicsterjjhall, "help stop gracefully" etc. gives the answer
21:38.17clint_nwhit: similar concerns to fax machines apply to newer communicator protocols...
21:38.32nwhitthe fax machines work great over the same setup
21:38.43nwhitbut the adt does communicate correctly
21:38.52jjhallBicster: Is the differnce that when convenient will still allow new calls to initiate?
21:38.52clint_nwhit: whereas older protocols (sescoa, ademco, silent knight, radionics fast, etc.) will be fine in just about any config.
21:39.00Bicsterjjhall, yes
21:39.04clint_nwhit: if using bpsk or newer, treat as fax line.
21:39.12jjhallBicster: OK, makes sense.
21:39.26nwhitclint: how would i know what protocol they are using?
21:39.36*** part/#asterisk Bicster (~Bicster@bicster.user)
21:39.51jjhallnwhit: The installation manual for your system should have those specs.
21:40.03nwhitadt installed it
21:40.06clint_You'd probably have to ask the vendor, as it varies greatly even among the same company's locations (typically, they've bought out local companies and continue to use their stuff)
21:40.16clint_nwhit: Most panels support dozens of protocols.
21:40.34nwhitok
21:40.55jjhallADT should be able to tell you then.  When I had an ADT system at my old house, the installer left the installation documentation with me too, including a list of how it was currently programmed.
21:41.30Moc_We had these info within the security alarm control box
21:42.32jjhallThey also told me that they could install a cellular modem on my system so I didn't have to have a land line.  They quoted me  $300 for hardware/installation and an additional $10 per month
21:43.39nwhiti will talk to them
21:44.14r0d3ntjjhall, it's not a cellular modem
21:44.34r0d3ntit's a 900mhz RF solution i believe...
21:45.00jjhallr0d3nt: They told me cellular, but I'm sure they have different systems.  Either that or the rep didn't know what they were talking about.
21:45.02r0d3ntquite common to have as a backup over the POTS line...
21:45.12r0d3ntmost likely the rep was a tool.
21:45.21r0d3nti would be surprised..
21:45.45jjhallSimplest of answers... ;-)  Headed home.  Catch ya' later.
21:45.52*** part/#asterisk jjhall (~chatzilla@24-119-114-94.cpe.cableone.net)
21:46.54clint_There are cellular ones... You're right, they aren't modems per se - they use the control channel to send the few bytes of data required for alarm signalling in the call setup message.
21:47.36fileOKAY - so who is going to cluecon?
21:47.43filenevermind, YOU ALL SHOULD BE!
21:47.43cursorNo comics allowed
21:47.46fileevery last one of you!
21:47.52fileif you aren't, 'tsk 'tsk
21:48.25CyberKnetfile: cluecon is in chicago this year?
21:49.03nwhitwith call parking, how do I return a parked call back to the extension that parked it after the timeout?
21:49.21*** join/#asterisk P-Chan (~jpfingstm@68.142.66.200)
21:49.26fileCyberKnet: yes
21:50.28CyberKnetfile: aah. unfortunately I will not be able to make it.
21:50.38CyberKnetI consider myself tsk'd
21:50.55filegah
21:50.57CyberKnetbecause as a good asterisk user knows, everything is bought to me by asterlink and cluecon
21:51.46fileexactly!
21:52.01P-ChanAnyone here familiar with AMP?  I'm having an unusual issue were if a DID is called which brings you directly to a phone, vm works, if you call the ring group and then transfer to an extension, vm doesn't work!
21:52.02CyberKnetergo, I am thoroughly tskd
21:52.29CyberKnetand also thoroughly ticked
21:53.26*** join/#asterisk brettnem (~brettnem@208.54.232.29)
21:54.12filein a perfect world, sure
21:54.15filein the real world, nope
21:54.18file:)
21:54.18CyberKnetand in return, I shall play an asterlink/cluecon ad to all users prior to connecting them =)
21:54.34CyberKnet"This call brought to you by Asterlink. Like all good things."
21:55.17brettnemhello all.. long time no see
21:55.21brettnemall 285 of you
21:55.36CyberKnetall 285 of us say hello back.
21:55.38file:)
21:55.40CyberKnetyou are now suitably deaf
21:55.42CyberKnet=)
21:55.46PBXtech200 are bots
21:55.47altjust making you feel at home
21:56.05brettnemhmm.. no one is wearing pants in here??
21:56.16brettnemso.. what did I miss? anything?
21:56.51brettnemha!
21:56.54bkw_haha
21:57.10altI'm not sure how to answer that....
21:57.16brettnemheh.. been hanging out in the ser channel.. for about 6 hours.. I think maybe 15 lines scrolled by
21:57.37CyberKnetbkw_: if I sign up with an 800 number now, can you guys lnp my tulsa number later and replace the 800 number with it? or would that be too much trouble?
21:57.52bkw_CyberKnet, dont know at this time.
21:57.54brettnemso what's new? has anyone gotten it to work yet?
21:57.55bkw_I know we can't now
21:58.08CyberKnetbkw_: aah. I thought you were able to lnp in Tulsa
21:58.15bkw_nope :(
21:58.22brettnemoh comon no lnp bkw_ ? ;)
21:58.23CyberKnetwell that changes everything.
21:58.40ManxPowerWhere can you lnp?
21:58.56brettnembkw_ I'd say we should partner up.. but I think OK is kinda backwards in the regulartory arena
21:58.59brettnemme?
21:59.22brettnemManxPower: Austin, Dallas, Fort Worth, Houston, San Antonio.. for now.. more soon..
21:59.38brettnemgag.. spelling
21:59.53ManxPowerSo basically "big cities in texas"?
22:00.03CyberKnetteliax can lnp in tulsa... but they have a 2c connect fee, which bites.
22:00.05brettnemfor now.. I'm working on little cities right now
22:00.43brettnembut yes.. for now, big cities.. actually.. I can lnp in all of those LATAs.. not just those metro areas.
22:00.44CyberKnetwell crap. this changes everything.
22:01.08brettnemdidn't there used to be a day when 2c wasn't a whole lot of money?
22:01.48brettnemI get bills for $0.000x per data dip for calls.. and those even add up
22:01.48CyberKnetbrettnem: well, 2c connect fee + 2c/min 6/6 so your minimum call cost is 2.2c
22:02.10brettnemunless you only talk for 5 seconds. :)
22:02.39brettnemseen that cellular ad where the family is calling each other and talking like auctioneers? :)
22:02.54CyberKnetminimum call 6sec, 6sec billing.
22:03.04brettnemoh.. bastards!
22:03.04CyberKnetbrettnem: heh
22:03.19brettnemwell.. I think the days of per minute calls are coming close to an end.
22:03.30CyberKnetper minute calls are fine with me
22:03.35CyberKnetI just object to the connect fee.
22:03.41brettnemvoip is just sucking on that now cause it can.. but there is little justification for it.
22:04.05brettnemwhat part of the network is billed per minute? the transport? cross connects?
22:04.22CyberKnetI dont understand the question sorry
22:04.33brettnemI suppose it's a good thing they don't put me in marketing.. :)
22:04.50brettnemwell I'm a carrier.. I have DS3s and T1s.. I don't pay per minute for that stuff
22:04.59CyberKnetthe per sec doesn't start till you get an answer.
22:05.06CyberKnetbut you also pay per minute to get to their "voicemail"
22:05.14brettnemI mean.. if you want to get technical.. we can work out erlangs and such and get a per minute.. but it's probably neglegable
22:05.28brettnemthat's baloney.. heh.. but everyone is doing it.. so why not?
22:05.44CyberKnetI'm fine with that part
22:06.15CyberKnetI'd even be happy if they dropped the 2c connect fee and switched to 66/6
22:07.04P-ChanCan someone help me out with my unusual voicemail issue?  show dialplan shows '15' =>           1. Macro(exten-vm|15@default|15) and when dialing from the outside directly to the phone (did) then I get vm, when I call ring group and have someone transfer me to that exten I get "SIP/15||tr" (no vm)
22:07.06CyberKnetI very very rarely make a call less than 1m 5s
22:07.16brettnemwell I suppose it's a good thing you are willing to pay. :)
22:07.49CyberKnetYes. I just dont want the connect charge.
22:07.50brettnemP-Chan: well one is calling the macro, one is calling the phone
22:08.58P-Chanbrettnem:  AMP uses a "macro-exten-vm" macro which uses dialparties.agi to make the connection.
22:09.03*** join/#asterisk PyroSteve (~steve@wsip-70-183-114-254.no.no.cox.net)
22:09.10PyroSteveYO YO YO !!
22:09.21cursorLater, guys
22:09.34P-Chanbrettnem:  Any idea how I would debug this?  (Some extensions work, some don't)
22:11.00P-Chanbrettnem:  I think this is where it decides not to put it to vm:  s,2,GotoIf($[${CHANNEL:0:5} = Local]?novm,1:3)
22:11.06jontowquestion, since i think i've been out of it for a bit.. what is 'qozap' ?
22:11.29jontowah, quadBRI driver
22:12.08CoaxDMmmm, nummm. quad bri.
22:20.31bkw_And the answer is.. CLUECON.COM
22:21.55PBXtechwhats the question
22:22.06bkw_42
22:26.58jontowok, thats fucking weird.
22:27.06PBXtechshhhaa
22:27.15jontowERROR[19425]: chan_zap.c:9437 steup_zap: Unknown signalling method 'pri_cpe'
22:27.45jontowwhy would that be invalid? it knows that it is in PRI mode ..
22:28.40jontowi see
22:28.46jontowZAPATA_PRI needs to be defined.. wonder why it wasn't :(
22:30.13rvhianyone uses ast_data?
22:30.31rvhitried to "include" a context
22:30.35rvhinot sure how to do it
22:32.03*** join/#asterisk tholo (~tholo@g4.sigmasoft.com)
22:32.31*** join/#asterisk kados (~jmf@cpe-65-24-137-210.columbus.res.rr.com)
22:34.20kadosI've just starting my investigation of asterisk for our organization -- do I need two phone lines to handle call routing (customer calls in, hits 3 for tech support, * routes the call to my cel) or can I do that over the network (or do I need a special service for that)?
22:42.07*** join/#asterisk pepzi (pepzi@hd5e25419.gavlegardarna.gavle.to)
22:42.22pepziwhy wont "exten => _5999*X#,1,Answer" work?
22:43.29*** part/#asterisk tholo (~tholo@g4.sigmasoft.com)
22:44.02Sato1cuz "#" could taken for your devices as a termination key, not as par of the dial
22:44.15Sato1s/par/part
22:45.10pepzioh, i see.. but _5999*X* would work right?
22:45.21Mocish
22:45.33Sato1pepzi, i should, try it
22:45.45pepziyep, that works :)
22:49.02*** join/#asterisk syslod (~yurplsl@65.114.15.71)
22:50.12*** part/#asterisk grolloj (~chatzilla@slim-eth0.horizonlive.net)
22:52.51*** join/#asterisk outtolunc (~me@ppp-69-237-32-168.dsl.pltn13.pacbell.net)
22:55.01*** join/#asterisk cp5 (~samy@dsl093-032-201.snd1.dsl.speakeasy.net)
22:55.35cp5anyone ever see phones that would register but would remain "UNREACHABLE", basically i have both a hardphone and softphone that are displaying this symptom. they are both remote. the externip= is set correctly in sip.conf. internal phones are registered fine
22:55.48cp5localnet= lines are also set properly
22:56.17cp5i'm packet sniffing on my own machine and my softphone won't even respond to the OPTIONS/NOTIFY lines coming in
22:56.59syslodcp5 what is doing nat?
22:57.00Sato1there are some devices that does not like to be monitored, sip or iax
22:57.37darwin35whats going on with callforwarding and call waiting
22:57.53darwin35*70 and *71 dont work
22:58.12cp5syslod, the client sides have NAT
22:58.20cp5the server side is NAT'd but has port forwarding
22:58.26cp5on the SIP and RTP ports
22:58.35cp5i see all data going in/out of the SIP ports on both sides
22:58.36syslodYou qualify isnt working right to the clients?
22:58.44*** join/#asterisk bjohnson (~bjohnson@66.11.188.6)
22:58.51cp5syslod, it's not working on remote clients, works fine for clients on the same LAN as the asterisk server
22:59.15cp5i even see the OPTIONS messages on the machine with the remote softphone with a packet sniffer, yet the softphone isn't sending anything back
22:59.18syslodRight, broken on NAT client right?
22:59.52cp5syslod, broken on a remote client behind a NAT. HOWEVER, i've tried using another asterisk server at another remote location from this client, and it works
22:59.56cp5so it's not the client NAT
23:00.18cp5and i also have TWO remote phones on two DIFFERENT NATs that are displaying this symptom
23:00.24syslodI've seen that with NAT with no ALG.
23:00.28cp5ALG?
23:00.48syslodApplication Level Gateway. Apparently only higher end routers/firewalls have it.
23:01.01cp5i see, what's the actual problem that occurs?
23:01.07syslodWe have the exact same problems when two phones are trying to work over NAT.
23:01.10cp5my machine is receiving all the packets...I can even make a CALL from the client
23:01.10*** join/#asterisk Nuxi (~nuxi@cust-sdsl-204-250-82-202.bzn-co-i1000-01.bridgeband.net)
23:01.19cp5and calls go through fine
23:01.23cp5that i initiate
23:01.25syslodPackets and SIP devs get confused
23:01.45syslodWhat is NAT device?
23:01.47cp5so it's the asterisk server's NAT that's messed up?
23:02.14cp5linksys
23:02.19cp5BEFSR41v4
23:02.20*** join/#asterisk NewSole2 (dave@i216-58-44-245.avalonworks.net)
23:02.25syslodI haven't had any problems with RNAT to Asterisk.  I havne't had many problems with 1 NAT and 1 client. It seems to happen when you have 1 NAT and many clients.
23:03.01syslodThere you go.  I don't think it'll work well with multiple phones.  We simply switched our our linksys with a adtran 2050 and it works great.
23:03.09cp5hmm
23:03.12syslodadtran has ALG.
23:03.15cp5that's kind of strange though
23:03.20syslodLinksys should but they don't
23:03.30Nuggethttp://slacker.com/photos/powermac/IMG_3926  <-- mmmmmm
23:03.32cp5how does ALG help in this case? my softphone is receiving the packets, my phone is just not responding and i don't understand why
23:03.50gambolputtyanyone work with the MYSQL command?
23:03.57syslodI'll called and they keep telling me to buy a PAP2 if I wanted VOIP.  They didn't get the fact there are 10,000+ sipuras out there dieing to connect to the VOIP realm.
23:04.35syslodWithout the ALG it screwed up NAT so on some level it couldn't map/find where things were supposed to go.
23:04.52syslodgambolputty: in another life.  What you trying to do?
23:05.24cp5syslod, but the packet leaves the network
23:05.41syslodYea.  BUt you sip device can't seem to figure out what its getting right?
23:06.00darwin35what the fusk did they change cf for
23:06.02gambolputtydo a mysql database lookup
23:06.09gambolputtyput a value into a variable
23:06.12cp5syslod, yeah...what in the packet is messed up?
23:06.14cp5any idea?
23:06.43gambolputtyusing realtime with mysql and * cvs
23:06.57syslodI don't know but the ALG in adtran fixes it.  We have offices that have 30 or so polys that all go to central server.  I wish someone would either make linux do it or openwrt on linksys.
23:07.31syslodmysql -> select you DB -> do select query.
23:07.46syslodI've been fighting ALG for a month now.
23:08.07syslodIts really complicated.  My solution before the adtran was openwrt and siproxd.
23:08.28gambolputtyQuery resultid ${connid} SELECT\ ringlength\ from\ sip_buddies\ where\ name=${ARG2})
23:08.40gambolputtyI get nothing from resultid
23:08.45*** join/#asterisk shido6 (~shido@d57-87-253.home.cgocable.net)
23:08.51fileshido6: oh no it's u
23:08.53mepplgute nacht
23:10.04shido6sounds like a meal served with sheep
23:10.56syleZT_CHANCONFIG failed on channel 1: No such device or address (6): i keep getting this message :(......when i first got the tdm400p it only had 2 fxo(red) modules and i never plugged the ide cable in and it worked fine, now i got the other 2 fxs modules(green) in, put in power cable cause it bitched for first time about it and i get this message
23:11.37syleideas? and i don;t even see the card in /proc/interrupts
23:11.47sylewith all modules loaded
23:12.20ManxPowersyle: if the kernel modules are loaded you will see the card in /proc/interrupts as well as in the output of "lsmod"
23:12.47sylestrange cause i see them in lsmod but not in /proc/interrupts
23:13.48*** join/#asterisk W1thdr4w (~Withdraw@ip70-181-96-254.oc.oc.cox.net)
23:13.51sylewctdm                  33216  0
23:13.51sylezaptel                205060  1 wctdm
23:13.55sylefrom lsmod
23:14.00sylenothing in interrupts
23:14.20sylei was thinking maybe that was just a fedora core 3 thing but i guess not
23:14.52syledoes the card only need the hd cable with fxs(green) modules?
23:15.24syledoes it matter what order they go onto the card
23:16.51muntzI'm still trying to figure out why I can't register with my provider using linux while with the same asterisk config I can register using FreeBSD
23:17.16muntzPerhaps I'm getting something wrong in the MASQ
23:17.21bkw_Nugget,
23:17.28bkw_don't make me smack you
23:17.29W1thdr4whey im making a asterisk box for a project for school what do u guys think of this ata...
23:17.31W1thdr4whttp://store.voxilla.com/customer/product.php?productid=16168&cat=248&page=1
23:17.42muntzfor instance, in IPMASQ, the gateway is the external NIC's IP, right?
23:18.09Nuggetheh
23:18.10ManxPowerW1thdr4w: Get the SPA-2100 if you can.
23:18.17muntzWhereas in FreeBSD ipnat the gateway is always the internal IP
23:18.19Nuggetif it makes you feel any better, the machine arrived all screwed up.
23:18.22ManxPowerW1thdr4w: That gives you 1FXO and 1FXS
23:18.23NuggetI still haven't been able to boot it.
23:18.30Nuggetthe dvd drive is borked.
23:19.21W1thdr4wManxPower, im trying to find the best ata for asterisk this ata is just going to be a possible way to connect to the asterisk box
23:19.25W1thdr4wdo i need the router funtions
23:21.19syleanyone runnign fedora core 3?
23:21.30syledo you see the card in /proc/interrupts?
23:23.51W1thdr4wManxPower; am i able to configure the analog ports as ata adapters
23:23.51*** join/#asterisk Sedorox (brandon@sedorox.staff.smartserv)
23:24.07W1thdr4wso i could have 2 old school phonesconnected to the spa2100
23:29.44W1thdr4wanyone have any sugestions for a very cheap voip phone for my project?
23:30.05syslodjust get a spaxxxx
23:30.43W1thdr4wis that that soft phone?
23:31.00syslodNo its a gateway
23:31.17zipbudgetone
23:31.41zipI would just get an iaxy
23:31.47W1thdr4wim looking for something i can connect to a newtowk that has asterisk running on it
23:31.48syslodgrandstream a start.  I hate those big buttons.
23:31.53W1thdr4wits for a demo
23:31.53W1thdr4wfor school
23:31.58syslodasterisk running on it??
23:32.02W1thdr4wno
23:32.08syslodGet a GS wireless router
23:32.12W1thdr4wasterisk running on a computer on the same network
23:32.20W1thdr4wthen have the phone connect to the asterisk box
23:32.47syslodYou can hook anything to it, a spa, a poly, grandstream, etc.
23:32.57shido6custard
23:34.00muntzchan_skinny said, unable to get our IP address
23:34.03W1thdr4wi just was someything that wont have so many funtions that it becomes hard to config
23:34.21syslodThe spa is easy, so is the grandstream phone.
23:34.27muntzI'm now registered but have no dialtone
23:34.53zipjust get a wrt54g, check out the openwrt experimental builds
23:35.05zipthey are $50
23:35.23syslodzip: U talking about a phone or putting * on it?
23:35.28zip* on it
23:35.34muntzIAX Ready and listening on IP 0.0.0.0 port 4569
23:35.55syslodYou'll need the GS if you really plan to use it.  The G doesn't have enough space.
23:36.02muntzsouldn't it be listening on the external IP?
23:36.11syslodAnyone seen a SIP ALG out there anywheres?
23:36.21Nugget<PROTECTED>
23:36.41*** join/#asterisk jskcr|lappy (~jskcr@jskcr.user)
23:36.49muntzmy fvourite mua
23:37.29syslodf$#@ NAT really sucks.  Unless you have a $300 adtran. They seem to know how to do it.
23:37.51*** join/#asterisk anti (russ@anti.developer.gentoo)
23:38.05muntzor does 0.0.0.0 represent all interfaces
23:38.07muntz?
23:38.41syslodmuntz: You working with NAT?
23:38.57muntzYes, but the asterisk server IS the NAT server.
23:39.12muntzasterisk and NAT on same server
23:39.23muntzworks great in FreeBSD
23:39.42muntzNow I want it to work with Leenookz
23:39.44syslodHmm. I have that working on a NAT openwrt box.
23:39.59W1thdr4wanyone have a discount coupon for voxilla?
23:40.35muntzI have compters inside this NAT that are able to do anything they want to the Interweb
23:40.48muntzso I dunno if NAT is broken . . .
23:41.23muntzNothing on the Interweb talks directly to the Sipura box, right?
23:41.32*** join/#asterisk implicit (~implicit@lgb-cust-66.18.140.106.mpowercom.net)
23:41.37syslodNAT just sucks.  I've been pulling my hair out trying to get polys, spas, etc to work behind a $80 linksys.  Seems to work with one but not more.
23:41.50muntzBecause I have no ipfwding working on FleaBSD
23:41.56muntzand it's all "good"
23:42.10muntzeuw. $80 Linksys
23:42.30syslodA $300 adtran works.  Too bad somebody doesn't implment in linux
23:42.50muntzsorry, I'd rather know whats happening inside my network
23:43.04muntzthe Linksys is a "black box"
23:43.16muntzdunno wtf it's up to
23:43.17syslodlinksys and openwrt lets you in.
23:43.30muntzopenwrt?
23:43.39muntzme googles
23:43.43W1thdr4wive been out of the asterisk game for a while is the current binary available from apt-get ?
23:44.09muntzopenwrt.org.
23:44.22jskcr|lappy1.07-3 Withdr4w
23:44.40syslodopenwrt = $50 * box
23:45.07W1thdr4wcuz last time i instaled asterisk on my xbox i had problems cuz it wassnt the most recent ver
23:46.20muntzopenwrt = $50 * box ?
23:46.36muntzum
23:46.39syslod$50 for the linksys +openwrt+asterisk
23:46.48muntzHow can I be registered and have no dialtone?
23:46.53muntzalsa is configured
23:46.54Sedoroxa $50 Asterisk box...
23:46.59*** join/#asterisk TonyAlmeida (~tonyalmei@61.33.161.6)
23:47.03muntzI can play music files
23:47.10syslodWell $89 if you buy it at radio shack.
23:49.22muntzSo I guess the answer is no. Asterisk herself is not in a NAT.
23:49.40muntzthe Sipura device IS inside the NAT
23:50.12muntzI can browse the Sipura's web pages all I want
23:50.18muntzping it
23:50.20muntzetc
23:50.30*** join/#asterisk Vercingetorix (~icechat5@69-173-140-135.agstme.adelphia.net)
23:51.16syslodmuntz: Same ports for SIP and RTP?
23:52.51W1thdr4wha lol i was reading the non technical manual for asterisk and the ppl who wrote it are located only a few miles from where i live
23:54.20terrapenhahah
23:54.39terrapenwas it in this channel that the guy came trolling the other day?
23:54.47terrapentrolling for Google click fraud?
23:55.15terrapenhrmmm
23:55.17*** join/#asterisk [hC] (~hardcore@8.10.2.4)
23:55.19terrapenmaybe it was somewhere else
23:55.30terrapenoh, nm
23:56.02W1thdr4wif ur talking about me im not trying to be annoying
23:56.13*** part/#asterisk terrapen (~cjs@fw-01.satx.bikeworld.net)
23:56.25[hC]If i want to set up an IAX trunk between to asterisk boxes, one of them will be accepting calls (DID) and the other will be accepting outgoing calls from box A. In order to do this and not have to specify two IAX peers, is that just a matter of naming the iax peer the same on both sides?
23:59.35muntzwhat is skinny.conf for
23:59.36muntz?
23:59.53niZonSCCP
23:59.55niZoncisco phones

Generated by irclog2html.pl by Jeff Waugh - find it at freshmeat.net! Modified by Tim Riker to work with blootbot logs, split per channel, etc.