irclog2html for #asterisk on 20050501

00:00.21anthmyou could however, write your own sip stack then use it in your own chan_sip so when you are forced to release your code you only need to release the channel driver and not your stack =>
00:00.21iqdrumkilla, ok I will have my boss call him or something
00:00.41drumkillaanthm: indeed, but I'm not trying to encourage such things  ;)
00:00.46drumkillaiq: sounds good
00:01.19*** join/#asterisk bkw_ (~brian@bkw.developer.and.friend.of.asterisk)
00:01.19*** mode/#asterisk [+o bkw_] by ChanServ
00:01.21CapaneusApr xx xx:xx:xx NOTICE[31521]: chan_iax2.c 7083 socket_read rejected attpemt from 65.39.205.121.  requested/capability 0x4/0x4 incompatible with our capability 0xff03
00:01.37bkw_Capaneus, I think thats clear
00:01.43Capaneusany ideas drumkilla
00:01.48drumkillaallow=ulaw
00:01.58bkw_is it idiot time?
00:02.06drumkillabkw_: put away the bat ...
00:02.14bkw_But I wanna.. please!!!!
00:02.15bkw_haha
00:02.39ShadowMaster1Am I in the right place to seek help on a zaptel problem?  When I look at the ZTCFG -v it shows the interfaces, but they don't seem to show in Asterisk..
00:02.54bkw_sounds like you need to configure zapata.conf too
00:02.55drumkillacheck zapata.conf ....
00:02.59drumkilladang, you beat me
00:02.59drumkilla:)
00:03.01*** join/#asterisk iq|laptop (~iq@209-180-111-103.omah.qwest.net)
00:03.05bkw_MUAHHAHAHAHA
00:03.05ShadowMaster1ok, just a sec
00:03.12kramanthm: clearly if his own chan_sip linked to his own sip stack it would still be covered by GPL
00:03.17kramand he would have to release the stack as well
00:03.21kramjust for clarification
00:03.21CapaneusI've got allow=ulaw in my iax.conf
00:03.38drumkillakram: oh yeah, sorry
00:03.41bkw_kram not if his stack talks over a socket! ;)
00:03.54kramdepends, actually :)
00:03.58iqwhat about the stand alone module - like loadable modules for asterisk. will have to realease code as well?
00:04.01bkw_if you have a clear line drawn then he wouldn't
00:04.06kramjust because you go across a socket doesn't free you from linkage requirements (e.g. XMLRPC)
00:04.06drumkillaiq: absolutely
00:04.14bkw_ok then AGI doesn't either
00:04.21bkw_so all AGI scripts are GPL too
00:04.25kramAGI is questionable
00:04.29bkw_its the same concept
00:04.35kramit's not totally clear with AGI if GPL applies or not
00:04.48ShadowMaster1ok, I'm confused perhaps..  I have a zapta,conf that lists signalling=fxs_ks ; X100P
00:04.48ShadowMaster1group=1
00:04.48ShadowMaster1context=incoming
00:04.49ShadowMaster1channel => 1
00:04.56drumkilla~pastebin
00:04.57jbotit has been said that pastebin is a place to paste your stuff without flooding the channel - try http://pastebin.ca
00:05.03kramfor example, the fact that AGI and Asterisk do not share any memory or data structures directly would suggest it could be independent
00:05.10ShadowMaster1I didn't think 4 lines was a flood..
00:05.11drumkillaShadowMaster1: you need to set the signalling
00:05.19kramwhile at the same time the fact that an AGI script is useless without Asterisk suggests that it is in fact a derivative work
00:05.28krambecause it has no value without Asterisk, and there is no substitute whatsoever
00:05.30bkw_I don't see it like that
00:05.37tzangerwerd to my voip brothers
00:05.41kramwell, in the end neither you nor I are here to make that decision
00:05.44kramonly the FSF could
00:06.20kramsame for manager interface
00:06.21iqmy boss is also thinking of purchasing sip code from bea and integrating it with asterisk - to eleminate NAT issues. according to bea their sip implementation NAT safe.
00:06.39Wi_Fihey guys is there and asterisk@home channel?
00:06.46bkw_but software that speaks to the manager interface doesn't have the GPL requirement
00:06.48bkw_if thats the case
00:06.51bkw_we got some lawsuits to file
00:06.53drumkillaiq: to be able to distribute that, you'd have to have a commercial license
00:06.54iqWi_Fi, try #amportal
00:07.01ShadowMaster1drumkilla:  when you say set signalling..  can you expand on that?  They are x100p (?) cards, connected to POTS lines from to the local bell CO.
00:07.17kramwe have asked the GPL to provide us an opinion on whether AGI and Manager constitute derivative works, but the jury is still out
00:07.20drumkillaShadowMaster1: the signalling= option in zapata.conf
00:07.36bkw_that isn't "linking"
00:07.58bkw_so all web browsers are under the Apache lic. if the speak to an apache server
00:08.00drumkillalinking isn't necessarily the only means for defining a derivative work
00:08.03bkw_NOT
00:08.09krambkw: no, that's not the case
00:08.15bkw_its the same concept
00:08.19drumkillano it's not
00:08.20bkw_exactly the same
00:08.22bkw_yes it is
00:08.24bkw_its fucking socket
00:08.25krambecause a web browser shares no common datastructures and communicates via an industry standard protocol
00:08.32kramfurthermore, you can use a web browser without using apache
00:08.37drumkillaweb pages are not dependent on apache
00:08.42drumkillathey could be used on another server
00:08.55ShadowMaster1drumkilla:  Are you saying it needs to be re-compiled with a different config or that I need to somehow make changes here and restart?
00:09.14kramin any case, we've asked the FSF to issue an opinion just to clear it up
00:09.22drumkillaShadowMaster1: not recompiled, you just need to add signalling=fxs_ks to zapata.conf and restart asterisk
00:09.23bkw_but you're not linking
00:09.37kramwell, again, that's an issue for the FSF to intepret IMHO
00:09.38drumkillabkw_: linking isn't the only thing that constitutes a derivative work
00:09.49bkw_what does "linking" mean?
00:09.50ShadowMaster1I have that line in the config..
00:09.51bkw_thats the key word
00:10.09kramright, the two key phrases are "Linking" and "Derivative Work"
00:10.14drumkillaShadowMaster1: if it's a digium product, contact Digium technical support
00:10.17iqdrumkilla, thanks for information :)
00:10.19drumkillaShadowMaster1: if not, then i can not help you
00:10.23kramand at this point, I think only the FSF knows enough about their intent to describe it
00:10.40drumkillaiq: you are welcome
00:10.40krami am not trying to re-intepret their opinion, i meerly want them to issue one :)
00:10.54kramand we've made a request.
00:11.02tzangerkram: who's that
00:11.04anthmwhat if you use a protocol that connects to a socket then to the sceen then a worker hanf copies the data to another screen that leads to manager =D
00:11.06tzangerthe FSF?
00:11.06*** join/#asterisk blakeops0 (BLAKEOPS@c-66-41-208-245.hsd1.mn.comcast.net)
00:11.07kramthe FSF
00:11.34blakeops0How do I setup an asterisk server to answer IAX2 calls?
00:11.59NuggetWhy couldn't Digium just explicitly state the permissability in exactly the same way Linus chooses to weaken the GPL by expressly allowing non-GPL kernel modules.
00:12.06bkw_blakeops0, 1. you didn't say Hi.  2. that was just rude to bust in here and ask one of the most basic questions that has been answered 10000000 times on google.
00:12.12NuggetHe didn't seem to require the FSF's buy-in to do so.
00:12.24krambecause I don't know that it would be in our best interest to provide such explicit permissibility
00:12.42bkw_well I don't see how speaking over a socket could in anyway be derived work over anything in asterisk
00:12.42Nuggetor is Digium trying to enforce the GPL across the management API boundary?
00:12.51krambut at the same time, if the spirit of the GPL is that such usage is permissible, we would not want to explicitly not permit it either
00:12.58drumkillathat's what we have been talking about ... that is for the FSF to decide
00:13.01tzangerbkw_: is a socket that different from a fifo?
00:13.09ShadowMaster1They are Digium cards, but I was told because of their age, they are no longer supported.  I guess Sorry for wasting your time...
00:13.21bkw_I don't think it is really a socket is a file descripter
00:13.23*** part/#asterisk ShadowMaster1 (~askme@host89-133.rancor.birch.net)
00:13.34drumkillaShadowMaster1: no, you're not wasting my time ... I was just informing you of the option.  If they are digium cards, they are still supported
00:13.35blakeops0hi bkw_
00:14.02kramDigium's opinion is that *if* manager/AGI constitute derivative works in the opinion of the FSF then we would want to enforce it as such, and if they do not constitute a derivative work then clearly we would not attempt to protect it that way
00:14.23tzangerdigium's support is for osmething like 2 years IIRC... that's an UNREAL amount of time in this kind of industry
00:14.32tzanger(unreal as in much much longer than most)
00:14.46Nuggetwell, then I truly hope that the FSF chooses not to be inconsistent in their perspective.
00:15.07Nuggettrying to enforce the GPL on applications talking to the API would be a real shame, imho.
00:15.14bkw_kram you know thats one WAY out there concent.
00:15.24bkw_er concent
00:15.27bkw_er concept
00:15.29bkw_fuckg I can't type
00:15.44drumkillabkw_: why is that way out there?
00:15.56Nuggetthe FSF are hardly a bastion of self-consistent opinion, either, so it seems risky to leave it in their hands.
00:16.01bkw_it just is.. its not logical to say that anything talking to something over a socket is derived works
00:16.03kramwell, it's not as far fetched as you might think
00:16.09tzanger84261 /var/log/asterisk/cdr-csv/Master.csv
00:16.12iqIf my Application can work indipendent and do something useful even without Asterisk --- and  there is one module that is available to integrate it with Asterisk. Can I get away with open the source of this interface and not the entire application?
00:16.13kramconsider corba
00:16.15tzangerI wonder if I should rotate that :-)
00:16.28kramdoes that mean that using corba means instantly there is no linkage at all just beause all the functions are processed over the network?
00:16.41drumkillaiq: you need to speak to Jim about that
00:17.02kramagain, there are numerous tests for derivative work and we want to know what the FSF believes the case to be since clearly they are the first-and-foremost expert on the license we've chosen.
00:17.09iqdrumkilla, ok :)
00:17.09*** join/#asterisk ShadowMaster1 (~askme@host89-133.rancor.birch.net)
00:17.09tzangerkram: you have to be careful
00:17.10Qwellkram: I don't claim to know squat about the GPL, but, consider something like esound
00:17.19tzangerkram: you're basically saying anything that can interact with asterisk is a derivative work
00:17.25kramnope, i'm not...
00:17.30kramclearly sip clients, iax clients, etc are not
00:17.37kramthey are stand alone
00:17.41ShadowMaster1Does that mean when my Cisco phone interacts with Asterisk, Cisco is breaking the license?
00:17.43kramthey do not need asterisk to properly function
00:17.47drumkillaguys, he has specified that Digium has asked the FSF to express an opinion ... that's about all that matters  :)
00:17.50tzangerkram: if I created an app which talked to asterisk over the CLI, is that a derived work?  If not, then why would osmething talking over the Manager interface?
00:17.53bkw_kram bit IAX clients would be by your logic
00:18.03NuggetI still don't see how Linux kernel modules aren't a clear precedent in this question.
00:18.05bkw_since without asterisk its not useful
00:18.08kramthey wouldn't, because iax clients can talk to themselves
00:18.18jterrerowhat is FSF?
00:18.22Nuggetlinux kernel modules are clearly not useful without linux, and yet the GPL can't pass that boundary.
00:18.46Qwelljterrero: Free Software Foundation
00:18.46anthmmaybe asterisk owes sip for using it's protocol =p
00:18.46Qwellfsf.org
00:18.46Nuggets/can't/is allowed to be stopped by/
00:18.46jterreroQwell: thx
00:18.46kramagain, i'm not saying that AGI and Manager *are* derivative works, I'm merely suggesting reasoning for why they *could* be viewed that way
00:18.46bkw_haha
00:18.47tzangerif it's not linking to asterisk (i.e. calling asterisk code through a linked API or wiht -lasterisk or whatever)
00:18.50bkw_kram you drink some SCO koolaid?
00:18.53kramand that's why we're asking FSF to issue an opinion
00:18.59Nuggetrisky move, kram.  ;)
00:19.09tzangerkram: ahhh
00:19.10kramit's risky to ask the FSF their opinion?
00:19.12tzangeryou're playing devil's advocate
00:19.15NuggetI think so, yes.
00:19.17bkw_well if they say it is
00:19.57drumkillathe FSF has the final word on that one
00:19.57bkw_thats the second I fork asterisk :P
00:19.57drumkillaI don't see what's so taboo about that
00:19.57tzangerkram: it's not risky to ask them their opinion, it's extremely wise
00:19.57kramforking it wouldn't help you at all
00:19.57drumkillait would still be held under the same constraints
00:19.57bkw_it has helped many projects in the past.. granted I wouldn't wanna do that
00:19.59krambecause if their opinion is that it is, and there is no explicit permission otherwise, your fork would clearly be subject to the same constraints
00:20.00NuggetFSF's opinion will be political, not reasoned.
00:20.09bkw_drumkilla, but see then it would be under the dual lic. stuffs
00:20.10Nuggetand you're binding yourself to it before you even hear it
00:20.17drumkillaNugget: whatever you think, but it is the one that matters in the end
00:20.26NuggetI disagree.
00:20.27bkw_kram but the fork would be "pure" gpl
00:20.31krami can only be bound by the FSF's opinion in the case that they say that it does not constitute a derivative work
00:20.33bkw_and a non-issue
00:20.38NuggetLinux told the FSF to pound sand and made his own decision for Linux.
00:20.49krambkw_: it would be exactly the same issue
00:20.54NuggetI don't see why Digium isn't in exactly the same position to decide for themselves
00:20.56kramif it's a derivative work, then it's a derivative work
00:21.02drumkillaNugget: and we could make that same exception if we wanted to
00:21.09Nuggetso do it!
00:21.10bkw_I don't think they would ever do that
00:21.12ShadowMaster1I thought this channel was to talk about asterisk, the PBX, not the FSF, GPL and political/legal licensing issues.
00:21.17tzangerI dunno.. common sense (yeah yeah, just hear me out) would dictate that 'derivative work' means that it relies on Asterisk code in order to execute.  Not function.
00:21.27drumkillaNugget: as kram said before, I don't know that that is in our best interest
00:21.27bkw_I think the whole point of AGI was the "clear" line
00:21.29kramnugget: it is only a derivative work if (a) the FSF says "yes it's a derivative work" and (b) Digium elects not to make an exception for AGI/manager
00:21.32QwellShadowMaster1: if kram wants to talk about the GPL, its his business. :p
00:21.35bkw_adn that was the impression from day one
00:21.37krambut let me ask this...
00:21.41kramout of curiosity...
00:21.46Qwell..literally, and figuratively
00:21.53kramlets suppose for example that the FSF said it was a derivative work...
00:22.02ShadowMaster1it's off topic for a support channel.  Take care folks..
00:22.06*** part/#asterisk ShadowMaster1 (~askme@host89-133.rancor.birch.net)
00:22.09Qwellmoron
00:22.10kramwhat is the advantage to the community at large of having Digium make the exception?
00:22.17jterreroseriously
00:22.24jterrerothis is actually pretty cool to read
00:22.30krami.e. for Digium to explicitly permit proprietary linkage to manager/AGI?
00:22.42*** join/#asterisk Cresl1n (~matt@216.207.245.23)
00:22.42drumkillait's just less open source for the community
00:22.45kramall it does is allow people to create proprietary software without paying for the priviledge to do so right?
00:22.47tzangerkram: the community can create applications around asterisk without being tied to the GPL?  Or if they decide to sell their application that uses asterisk (but does not link to it in an execution sense) , that they can
00:22.48Nuggetthe advantage is that it doesn't chill development of tools and applications which make asterisk more useful.
00:22.50bkw_but define "linkage"
00:22.59bkw_speaking to it via socket is not linkage
00:23.04kramwe already have a way you can purchase the ability to link outside of GPL
00:23.05tzangerbkw_: precisely
00:23.09krambut you have to pay for it, so it's a real cost
00:23.12tzangerfile descriptior/socket is not linking
00:23.14kramyou only go that way if you *really* have to
00:23.21tzangerlinking is using the internal API and/or structures
00:23.27kramtzanger: again, fd/socket is not the only issue here
00:23.28bkw_tzanger, exactly
00:23.36bkw_so agi and talking to the manager are not linking to it
00:23.43bkw_thus not within the GPL
00:23.48Nuggetrequiring the GPL is just as chilling to others in the open source community as it is to members of the commercial software community.
00:23.49tzangerkram: yes, I understand that, but if I wish to release my work under the BSD license I can't
00:23.53drumkillabkw_: but still may be considered derivative works
00:23.58bkw_how so?
00:24.02tzangeror some other OSS license or even Microsoft's "shared source" license
00:24.10tzangeryeah
00:24.11tzangerheh
00:24.11kramtzanger: you could release it under BSD so long as the combined work was distributed under GPL
00:24.12drumkillathat is for the FSF to decide, so this is really a worthless argument for us
00:24.13bkw_I want a clear logical example of HOW
00:24.20kramas i've said, bkw...
00:24.34kramit *could* be viewed as a derivative work in the sense that an AGI app cannot do anything without Asterisk.
00:24.41kramfurther, an app talking to manager cannot do anything without Asterisk.
00:24.42tzangerkram: BSD was a bad example, I meant under a more restrcitive license than GPL
00:24.55anthmwhat if you make an agi to http protocol converter and release the converter as derivative work, does it then engulf the http?
00:24.58kramtzanger: why should you be permitted to do so without purcahsing a license?
00:24.59NuggetBSD isn't a bad example, really.
00:25.03*** join/#asterisk iq_ (~iq@209-180-111-103.omah.qwest.net)
00:25.09tzangerkram: Asterisk can't do anything without libc or hte kernel (yes there are patches to address that)
00:25.20kramanthm: these are all questions i am not able to answer, nor am I attempting to provide an answer.
00:25.30kramAll I am trying to do is to suggest why there might be some issue at all
00:25.31tzangerkram: nobody's blasting you for being pedantic about this
00:25.34tzangerthis is a very serious issue
00:25.37anthmI'm just having fun =D
00:25.38kramand explain that I want the FSF to address th eissue.
00:25.48kramand explain one way or another
00:25.49bkw_it needs to be clearly addressed
00:25.50tzangerI mean this came up with the Kernel year ago
00:25.55kramif they say "no it's not a derivative work" then that's it, end of story.
00:25.58tzangerand why anything that runs on Linux is NOT a derivative work of the kernel
00:26.02anthmtree falling in the woods all that jazz
00:26.45tzangerI feel that 'derivative work' means links to a library that is GPL'd...
00:26.50tzangerhell even shared memory is not a derivative work
00:26.51tzangerIMO
00:27.01tzangerbut it needs to be clarified
00:27.07drumkillaindeed, and it will be :)
00:27.23bkw_ok here is one
00:27.32tzangerexcellent...  I admit I often let "common sense" preside and that is dangerous :-)
00:27.33bkw_something that just writes out config files.. under this logic would be GPL
00:27.37bkw_like an Asterisk GUI
00:27.39krami gtg but we can talk more later
00:27.45Nuggetsaying "you could release it under BSD so long as the combined work was distributed under GPL" is nothing more than saying "You're free to use the BSD license as long as you don't"
00:28.06drumkillai have to go, too ...
00:28.19bkw_haha
00:28.23bkw_well I have a good point there
00:28.24krami leave you only again with my other question...
00:28.40tzangerbkw_: I dunno
00:28.46tzangerasterisk depends on that app, not the other way 'round :-)
00:29.05kramwhich is: what is the advantage of allowing proprietary AGI/Manager if we even have the ability to regulate it at all under GPL?
00:29.10Qwelltzanger: nah, * doesn't need that app to run. :p
00:29.12*** join/#asterisk OloBola (~casper_sp@adsl-69-110-121-26.dsl.pltn13.pacbell.net)
00:29.21kramhow does the community benefit from that?
00:29.21*** join/#asterisk r0d3nt (~RatMan@wsip-24-234-241-84.lv.lv.cox.net)
00:29.24Nuggetkram: who said anything about proprietary?
00:29.31Nuggetthe issue is "non-GPL", not "proprietary"
00:29.32bkw_kram you have people building solutions they can sell
00:29.36kramwell just for example :)
00:29.38tzangerkram: the community is stifled if it can't 'use' asterisk without being forced into GPL
00:29.42kramwe can always make exceptions for other OSS
00:29.46kramfor example we did with OpenH323
00:30.11kramtzanger: i would argue they are not stifled so long as they're given a pay-for option for proprietary and exceptions as necessary for non-GPL OSS
00:30.12OloBolaI get chipmunks when converting voicemail to mp3 using lame encoder. What does this mean?
00:30.14tzangerI dunno I think there is CLEAR precident for 'derivative' meaning linking to via library
00:30.26Nuggetbut for the sake of your literal question, the benefit is that asterisk gets to potentially interface with other large applications.
00:30.34kramtzanger: clearly library linkage is considered linkage
00:30.35bkw_kram that harms the community in tons of ways
00:30.38kramthis question is outside of that
00:30.43krambkw_: which is?
00:30.44tzangerkram: I have never investigated commercial licensing of * but what if the licensing prices the work completely out of the market?
00:30.59bkw_I have to get a lic. to talk to the manager interface for something I plan on selling
00:31.01kramwell presumably AGI/manager would be a much smaller licensing scheme
00:31.05bkw_then what motivates me to create stuff
00:31.07tzangerkram:yes, but I think that there is clear precident showing that using shared mem, sockets, etc is *not* derivative
00:31.10bkw_if its all sucked up by the GPL
00:31.21bkw_I have to agree with tzanger on this one
00:31.25bkw_its been very clear to me
00:31.39bkw_from day one.. that AGI was invented to give clear line between GPL and non-gpl
00:31.41tzangerewe need the FSF to make it crystal sparkling clear
00:31.42krambut wouldn't it be conceivable that it could make more sense for switchware, for example, to either have to pay licensing fees in order to keep their app proprietary?
00:31.45tzangerand that's what Mark's after
00:31.56kramagain, playing devils advocate here
00:31.59tzangerswitchware?
00:32.03krami'll say this much
00:32.05bkw_kram oh this translates into "Digium" money
00:32.15bkw_its about the $
00:32.19tzangerbkw_: no
00:32.19kramright, which translates into bkw_/tony money as of late too, right?
00:32.26kramremember the H.323 driver?
00:32.28kramremember hiring kevin?
00:32.35kramremember that we're trying to *push* asterisk dev
00:32.42kramnot just passively sit back and wait for people to do it for us
00:32.44Nethabbad h323 bad
00:32.46kramwe're trying to work with the community
00:32.48tzangerthis isn't want he's specifically after I don't think...  he's just trying to get clarification from the FSF as to what 'derivative' includes and does not include...
00:32.55kramright
00:32.56Nuggetwhat if we want an hp openview agent to monitor our asterisk server?
00:32.59bkw_but in the end its still ALL about the money
00:33.03bkw_not the community
00:33.05kramand even if they say it *does* consittute a derivative work...
00:33.12Nuggetdoes hp have to gpl openview?
00:33.13kramit doesn't mean we'll necessary not give an exception
00:33.14bkw_money drives this
00:33.14anthmactually they never gave me any money for h323 =<
00:33.30tzangerit's clear that kram is not going to say "fuck you all, Manager/AGI is commercial only" -- he's just trying to figure out a) if it is and b) if Digium should make a broad exception for them if it is
00:33.38kramanthm: their MOU says they do
00:33.39bkw_kram and actually all this exception stuff might not be legal either.
00:33.41kramit's in writing
00:34.07kramgive bkw_ some time to cool down :)
00:34.13bkw_hehe
00:34.14bkw_i'm not hot
00:34.16krami think it'll make sense to him in time
00:34.17bkw_yet that is :P
00:34.21kramwhat i'm trying to say
00:34.22Nethabyes you are
00:34.27Nethabyour sooo hot
00:34.29krambkw_ is generally a very reasonable person in the long run
00:34.36bkw_what?
00:34.36krambut he also can be very emotional much like me :)
00:34.39bkw_What is logical about that?
00:34.41tzangerthe exceptions are legal...  digium can in a heartbeat switch OSS licenses if the FSF has their head that far up their ass
00:34.47bkw_i'm not emotional right now
00:34.48*** join/#asterisk slePP (~slepp@S01060040f48412ad.ed.shawcable.net)
00:34.49bkw_i'm quite calm
00:34.57kram*nods*
00:35.05tzangerthe FSF will eliminate themselves if they try to fuck around too much
00:35.24tzangercommon sense shoudl rule broadly and then law/licensing should come into play for the gray areas where common sense varies from place to place
00:35.29bkw_but i'm trying to see where the logic could say that talking over a pipe,fd or socket (which are all the same thing) could be considered derived work.
00:35.30kramanyway i'm late, but we'll talk again soon
00:35.39kramnothings going to happen without talking to the list and you too, of course, bkw
00:35.41tzangerbkw_: he's not saying it is... he's saying the FSF may declare it to be so
00:35.42kramyou know i wouldn't :)
00:35.46tzangerand if they do, what to do about it
00:35.58bkw_kram ok well the FSF needs to get it clarified
00:36.01kramand even if the FSF declares that it is -- which is not *at all* obvious...
00:36.07bkw_now where can I fax 1000  faxes to get their attention?
00:36.12kramwe still could issue the exception
00:36.21tzangerbkw_: I'll get my PRI on that right away with app_txfax :-)
00:36.23drumkillaa donation with those faxes might help, heh
00:36.26kramif we were convinced that was the way to go
00:36.30*** join/#asterisk BoRiS (boris@S01060040ca1e5b54.wp.shawcable.net)
00:36.42tzangerI'd get the 6 DS3s on it too but they're inbound-only
00:36.49kramhey i have an idea when i get back!
00:36.52drumkillaiq: just so you know, you started this :p
00:36.54bkw_hehe
00:36.57WilliamKI was able to hold and sustain a modem connection over VoIP last night for the 1st time
00:36.58WilliamK=)
00:37.00Nuggeta donation?  you're nuts.
00:37.03kramwe'll talk later, seriously late for dinner and then the movie (hitch hikers guide)
00:37.11tzangerkram: take care, have fun
00:37.17tzangerso long and thanks for all the fish
00:37.17bkw_kram the movie SUCKED
00:37.18drumkillacya kram !
00:37.20Qwellkram: Take me with you. :p
00:37.23bkw_have a good one!
00:37.29bkw_;)
00:37.34kramwell, we have to pay them a fee to make this determination.  Perhaps we could split the fee with some of the people who have an interest in the answer being that AGI/Manager does not, just to be sure that doesn't bias them
00:37.47tzangeruh
00:37.48kramit's not that much, all they asked for was $1000
00:37.51kramso we could split it 50/50
00:38.06kramand whatever the outcome, it's great to make a donation to the FSF :)
00:38.07tzangerapache, the kernel...  there are some big names that are seriously affected if they deicde to make 'derived' too broad
00:38.11krami don't mind paying the $1k myself
00:38.17Nuggetisn't "derived work" a term of art that is not specific to the GPL in any way?  why can't any lawyer make the determination?
00:38.32kramanyway, i gtg
00:38.49tzangerNugget: I think he's trying to make it clear for all of FSF
00:38.50iqdrumkilla, ya I know ;)
00:39.08Nethabok now that he's gone, who is charging 1000 and for what
00:39.10Nuggetwell, I just hope the FSF is rational on the issue, then.
00:39.17drumkillaNethab: the FSF
00:39.22tzangerNugget: me too
00:39.23Nethabis charging for what
00:39.36Nethabthe FSF as in Richard Stallman
00:39.46drumkillaNethab: read above
00:39.50tzangerwe're fucked
00:39.53tzangerRMS is not rational :-)
00:39.58NuggetFSF's blind eye toward redhat and dispute with Linus over kernel modules really doesn't give me much optimism that this will turn out well, though.  Their track record for consistency is quite poor.
00:40.01drumkillathe FSF is more that RMS
00:40.01WilliamKthe FSF is ran by one person?
00:40.36Nethabfor zapata kernal modules?
00:40.36iqare there any plan to implement SER kind of functionality in chan_sip ?
00:40.59Nethabno RMS is in charge
00:41.09Nethabthere's more than one person
00:41.12NuggetNethab: no, not zaptel.  kram wants to know if writing against the management AGI taints the other side with the GPL.
00:41.23drumkillaand AGI
00:41.25WilliamKokie
00:41.42WilliamKanyone have a good suggestion for motherboard/cpu combinations?
00:41.50QwellWilliamK: Tyan+opteron
00:42.05tzangerWilliamK: you have modem calls being sustained, I think you've got something :-)
00:42.22WilliamKusing Tyan + AMD Athlon 2000+ MP's right now
00:42.25Qwellhmm
00:42.39Nethabthe answer is obviously no, for the same reason that windows isn't GPL tainted for connecting to smtp
00:42.51tzangerNethab: that's the common sense answer
00:42.52NuggetNethab: well, it's not obvious to some people here.
00:42.53QwellNethab: smtp is a standard
00:42.54WilliamKofficially on the latest BIOS as of today - reflashed a little bit ago
00:42.55Nethabor any other GPL protocol software
00:43.01tzangerand that is what everyone believes... but it needs to be clarified
00:43.10Nugget"smtp" is not a "gpl protocol software"
00:43.14Nuggethell, smtp predates the gpl
00:43.34Nethabexactly just like the AGI isnt' a gpl protocll
00:43.39NuggetI think that linux kernel modules is the most clear precendent.
00:43.40*** join/#asterisk terrapen (~cjs@209.142.99.217)
00:43.43Nethabit's a protcol it has no license
00:43.44Nuggetyou can't gpl a protocol.
00:43.51tzangerNugget: not even kernel modules...  any linux app
00:43.54Nethabthat's what I'm saying
00:44.00terrapenhey
00:44.02Nuggetkernel modules are a different case than an app, though.
00:44.09terrapeni think there is a major DNS poisoning attack going on
00:44.10tzangeror as bkw mentioned, apache... I can talk to apache with a nongpl browser without the browser getting tainted
00:44.12Nuggetif anything could be argued as a derived work, that would be it
00:44.13terrapenanybody sseeing this?
00:44.16terrapencheck this out
00:44.23terrapendo a whois on bikeworld.com (me)
00:44.28terrapenand note that we dont expire until 2009
00:44.32tzangerNugget: IIRC linus made a specific exception for them
00:44.35terrapenthen go to http://www.bikeworld.com
00:44.42Nuggettzanger: yes, that's exactly what happened.
00:44.47Nuggetthe fsf grumbles about it too
00:44.50terrapenanybody else use Stargate?
00:44.53terrapenif you do, better check your domains
00:44.58Qwellterrapen: looks fine to me, whats wrong with it?
00:45.02tzangerNugget: yeah but that's why I say it's not a good exmaple
00:45.04tzangerer example
00:45.06Nethabyou can open a tcp/ip connection to a GPL software and not be anywhere near Tainting, tridge and bitkeeper *cough*
00:45.11Nugget"good" in what way?
00:45.15terrapenqwell, you aren't getting some kind of cheezy portal search site?
00:45.19Qwellno
00:45.25terrapendig bikeworld.com @4.2.2.1
00:45.32NuggetI mean "good" in the sense that it's a similar situation, not "good" in the sense that it agrees with how I want this asterisk situation to turn out.
00:45.39terrapenNon-authoritative answer:
00:45.39terrapenName:   bikeworld.com
00:45.39terrapenAddress: 67.15.35.160
00:45.44Qwell209.142.99.217
00:45.54terrapenOptical Jungle EVRY-206 (NET-67-15-35-0-1)
00:45.54Nethab4.2.2.1 is no good use 2.2.2.and 2.2.3
00:45.54terrapen<PROTECTED>
00:46.00terrapeni've never heard of optical jungle
00:46.07Qwell209.142.99.217 with 4.2.2.2
00:46.09WilliamKtzanger, just so you know... the modem call was over my 3com v.92 using a Sipura 2000 ATA and v3.1.2 of their firmware
00:46.13terrapenRoadRunner nameservers here are showing the same thing
00:46.19tzangerWilliamK: ahh
00:46.29tzanger"optical jungle" ??
00:46.30WilliamKI found 1 glitch in the code and that was you have to disable the echo canceller by hand on the ATA
00:46.33tzangerwhat a stupid name
00:46.37terrapentzanger: my thoughts exactly
00:46.40Nethabyou made a modem call over a Siputa?
00:46.49WilliamKNethab, yes last night
00:46.52Nethabsweet
00:46.53Nuggetterrapen: fire your dns administrator.
00:46.55Nethabwhat baud rate
00:47.00WilliamK49,333
00:47.04terrapenfire my dns admin?
00:47.06Nethabnot bad
00:47.10terrapennothing wrong wmith my DNS
00:47.16Nuggetlooks like they made a newbie mistake.  You recently moved ns2 and forgot to update the nameserver record, didn't you?
00:47.16Nethabi wonder if my tivo will work now
00:47.18tzanger49133??
00:47.19tzangerholy shit
00:47.28Nuggetthe nameserver record in the roots is different than how ns2 actually resolved.
00:47.33terrapenmany DNS servers are showing this problem
00:47.39terrapennothing changed on my end
00:47.43Nuggetyes, that's what happens when you do this.
00:47.49terrapenwhat ns2?
00:47.57Nuggetis ns2 209.142.99.219 or is it 67.15.35.160
00:48.02Nethabthe second name server
00:48.03terrapenits 209.142.99.219
00:48.03Nuggetns2.bikeworld
00:48.13terrapenmine --> 209.142.99.219
00:48.19WilliamKtzanger, of course my cable modem is only 10-17ms from the voip gateway
00:48.19Nuggetdid it used to be the 67.15.35.160 address?
00:48.23terrapeni've never heard of 67.15.35.160
00:48.24terrapenno
00:48.25terrapennever
00:48.29terrapenthat's why this is so odd
00:48.57Qwellns., ns1., ns2. are different
00:49.00Nethabi get 218 and 210
00:49.00Qwell.net vs .com?
00:49.02Nethab219
00:49.10terrapenmy servers are 209.142.99.218 and .219
00:49.12Qwellns.bikeworld.net.       86400   IN      A       67.15.35.160
00:49.19terrapenqwell: thats not my IP
00:49.26Nethabi got 217
00:49.33Nuggetok, weird.
00:49.36Qwellfix ns.bikeworld.net at your registrar :p
00:49.37terrapeni cannot, for the life of me, figure out how that 67.15.35.160 is getting out there
00:49.40`SauronNugget
00:49.44Nuggetthe whois record for ns2.bikeworld.net is the .219 address
00:49.46terrapeni think Stargate is hosed up
00:49.49`Sauronwhen's the next nucleartacos?
00:49.50terrapennugget: i know
00:50.02terrapenmaybe stargate has been 0wned
00:50.06Nethabwhois comes back with the proper name servers
00:50.09Nugget`Sauron: this coming wednesday
00:50.24`SauronHum, bummer
00:50.25terrapennethab, yep
00:50.28`Sauronthey should move to mondays
00:50.32Nethab[whois.stargateinc.com]
00:50.41Qwellterrapen: see if you can add/delete "ns." at your registrar...
00:50.49Nuggetwe could have one on a monday sometime.
00:51.01`SauronI'm already double-booked this wednesday
00:51.04`SauronYay
00:51.06terrapeni wish i could find another stargate customer
00:51.07NethabDomain Name: bikeworld.com ns1.bikeworld.net
00:51.07NuggetI'll just host one here later in the month.
00:51.14*** join/#asterisk kimc (~freenode@pcp09643046pcs.wbrmfd01.mi.comcast.net)
00:51.15terrapenthis problem is happening for every single one of my domains
00:51.17terrapenerr
00:51.20Nethabyour .com nameserver is pointing to .net
00:51.23terrapenevery single domain registered at stargate
00:51.27terrapeni know, nethab
00:51.34Qwellterrapen: What other domains?
00:51.39terrapennethab, ns1.bikeworld.net and ns2.bikeworld.net are mine
00:51.42OloBolai'm trying to convert a vm message from wav to mp3 using LAME enconder, but it's outputting 4x or so faster than the original. What does this usually mean?
00:51.42terrapenchrissnell.com
00:51.51terrapenweathertools.com
00:51.52Qwellright
00:51.54terrapengpstools.com
00:52.03Qwellall pointed to the same NS
00:52.04terrapenbut island.nu (different registrar) works fine
00:52.05Qwellget rid of ns.
00:52.10terrapenand island.nu is on the same NS
00:52.12Qwellns.bikeworld.net
00:52.14terrapenits not my NS
00:52.19terrapeni dont have ns.bikeworld.net
00:52.20`SauronOn wed. there's a meeting at Whole Earth on campus talking about travis county buying 600 acres of Reimer's Ranch
00:52.20Qwellyeah, get rid of it
00:52.24terrapenit has nothing to do with me
00:52.24`SauronGotta go to that
00:52.25Qwellat your registrar
00:52.32terrapensauron, hey, i've climbed there
00:52.32Nugget*nod*
00:52.39Qwelltell it to forget that it exists
00:52.58`Sauronterrapen: you in austin?
00:53.10terrapenthere is no NS.BIKEWORLD.NET. not here, nor at my registrar
00:53.13terrapenno, in san antonio
00:53.27Qwellterrapen: well, it sure as hell is resolving
00:53.29`Sauronoh, right
00:53.48terrapen`check this out:
00:53.59terrapendig bikeworld.com @24.28.131.62
00:54.04terrapenthat's my roadrunner nameserver
00:54.08terrapenit has the bogus info too
00:54.13terrapenone of the roots must be owned
00:54.16terrapenor hosed
00:54.44Qwellalright, ignore me, thats fine
00:54.53terrapeni am on stargates site, qwell
00:54.57Qwelladd one
00:54.59terrapenthere is absolutely no mention of ns.bikeworld.net
00:55.01terrapenwhy?
00:55.04Qwellif it is not there, add it
00:55.10Qwellso it updates the BS record
00:55.10terrapenthis has been set up this way for over 8 years, qwell
00:55.23QwellYou don't need to use it, just add it, so it removes the dumbass 67. address
00:55.28OloBolai'm trying to convert a vm message from wav to mp3 using LAME enconder, but it's outputting 4x or so faster than the original. What does this usually mean?
00:55.45terrapenyou're getting the 67 address because any domain of mine goes to this bogus nameserver, qwell
00:55.52cypromisw/w 21
00:55.52terrapenadding it on my end will nott help
00:56.04terrapenyour nslookups are not hitting my nameserver
00:56.04QwellNot on your end.  At your registrars end
00:56.08terrapenthey are hitting some other nameserver
00:56.17QwellYour registrar will update the root servers
00:56.41terrapensigh
00:57.09Qwellwhatever, I obviously don't know what I'm talking about
00:57.33terrapenyour solution is to add another nameserver with my registrar?
00:57.37terrapenso that they update the roots?
00:57.41QwellYes.  ns.bikeworld.net
00:58.13Qwellhttp://pastebin.ca/10692
00:58.40*** join/#asterisk dimas (~ds@vbc.elcom.ru)
00:58.47Qwellsomebody screwed up, and you can fix it by adding it at your registrar
00:58.54QwellYou don't need to use it
00:59.37Qwellhell, you can probably even delete it in a few days
00:59.42*** part/#asterisk PeaCeKeePa (~free@d141-52-2.home.cgocable.net)
01:00.46OloBolai'm trying to convert a vm message from wav to mp3 using LAME enconder, but it's outputting 4x or so faster than the original. What does this usually mean?
01:02.06Nethabit means that something is broken
01:02.34Nethabor that you shouldn't encode in VBR
01:02.38terrapenUpdate Failed. Please contact support with error code 541, the domain involved, and the nameservers you are trying to change to.
01:02.39OloBolamy error handling is set to "Something bad happened".
01:02.40terrapen<PROTECTED>
01:03.27OloBolaVBR = Variable Bit Rate ?
01:03.43*** join/#asterisk vpp (~noone@host-83-146-50-131.bulldogdsl.com)
01:03.47vpphi guys!
01:03.51Nethabyes variable bit rate
01:03.59Nethabhello vpp
01:04.02vppanyone know of a good config guide for asterisk and h323 ?
01:04.06Qwell~docs
01:04.07jbotDocumentation can be found at http://digium.com/index.php?menu=documentation or http://www.digium.com/handbook-draft.pdf or #asterisk-doc, or http://www.voip-info.org/wiki-Asterisk, or http://www.asteriskdocs.org
01:04.19*** part/#asterisk terrapen (~cjs@209.142.99.217)
01:04.25vppthanks
01:04.50vppu know of anything specific to h323 anyone?  i'll have a search, but i thought its worth asking :)
01:07.01Nethabvoip-info.org
01:07.07Nethabhave you tried there?
01:08.33WilliamKanyone know what I should put in the extensions.conf file to toss a call to the meetme bridge?
01:08.48*** join/#asterisk vpp (~noone@host-83-146-50-131.bulldogdsl.com)
01:09.27*** join/#asterisk nextime (~nextime@213-140-6-96.fastres.net)
01:12.49Nethabyou mean like call transfer
01:13.52WilliamKyeah but I want it to prompt the user for the confID and pin
01:18.01OloBolaNethab: I set VBR to true and it's still running really fast, must be something else. Any other suggestions?
01:22.54blakeops0Can anyone place a SIP call to this address? 8773386225@voip.cafe.bevocal.com
01:23.21blakeops0I'm getting some weird results
01:23.51WilliamKkewl
01:23.54WilliamKI got it to work
01:23.55WilliamK=)
01:31.41Nethabolobola, the only thing i can think of is that the original file is a different sample rate than the mp3
01:32.01Nethablike 44.1 versus 48khz
01:32.35Nethabyou may need to change the sample rate of the wav file before you convert to mp3
01:32.53OloBolaOk, thanks. I don't know much about audio stuff, I should do some homework.
01:45.06*** join/#asterisk bkw_ (~brian@bkw.developer.and.friend.of.asterisk)
01:45.06*** mode/#asterisk [+o bkw_] by ChanServ
01:45.36*** join/#asterisk FuriousGeorge (~brian@ool-43516ebb.dyn.optonline.net)
01:46.31*** join/#asterisk pussfeller (~todd@t1-rtc-woodlawn.rtcol.com)
01:47.10*** join/#asterisk dotwaffle (~waffle@hack118.plus.com)
01:47.48dotwaffleAnyone here use pfSense? Having trouble getting Asterisk to work with it...
01:48.05FuriousGeorgeanyone ever nuse IPCop with asterisk
01:48.36dotwaffleI have.
01:48.53FuriousGeorgedotwaffle: does it work w/ the rtp stuff * needs?
01:49.36dotwaffleFuriousGeorge: I believe so, I never had any trouble. It's just pfSense it doesn't appear to work with...
01:49.54FuriousGeorgepfSense?
01:50.10FuriousGeorgeis that an aspect of dmzing
01:50.40dotwafflenope, it's a smoothwall-alike, based on m0n0wall, which is a FreeBSD based route/firewall.
01:50.46dotwaffleBiiiig chain there.
01:51.46vppanyone here use h323?
01:51.58dotwaffleUmmm... Asterisk always worked fine with firewalls, but with pfSense, I'm getting (if you don't mind me intruding)
01:52.01dotwaffleMay  1 02:49:51 NOTICE[10394]: chan_sip.c:4035 sip_reg_timeout:    -- Registration for '[withheld]@sip.gossiptel.com' timed out, trying again
01:52.03FuriousGeorgedotwaffle: so i can stick my * box in the dmz, and not worry about NAT issues?
01:52.04dotwaffleMay  1 02:49:58 WARNING[10394]: chan_sip.c:694 retrans_pkt: Maximum retries exceeded on call 53d99ea51c1aa81d1ff943594039d6c3@127.0.0.1 for seqno 134 (Critical Request)
01:52.13FuriousGeorgeright?
01:52.35dotwaffleFuriousGeorge: Not a good idea. If you were to do that, I SERIOUSLY recommend you leave ports 1-1024 unforwarded.
01:52.36FuriousGeorgedotwaffle: im not using it now
01:52.55FuriousGeorgedotwaffle: ok, that makes sense
01:53.23dotwafflei hope so :)
01:53.42NethabI would say leave asterisk in the green zone not a blue zone
01:54.11Nethabin a 3 teired architecture, a dmz should have 3 zones
01:54.23FuriousGeorgeNethab: its not
01:55.07FuriousGeorgeim gonna go try to use this ipcop now
01:55.49dotwafflei thought blue zone was wireless?
01:56.24dotwaffleamber/orange was DMZ/Segregated, I thought.
01:57.39Nethabblue green yellow red
01:57.52Nethabblue is the untrusted, unwashed masses
01:58.14Nethabgreen is the publicly exposed but port restricted servers
01:58.36Nethabyellow is the unroutable, but internally usuable, and red is the holy grail
01:59.37*** join/#asterisk clinthome (~clinthome@va-chrvlle-cad1-bdgrp5-8d-209.chvlva.adelphia.net)
01:59.49dotwaffleah, right. At least that's firmly in my skull now :)
02:03.10*** join/#asterisk egon_l (~egon@pc-33-19-104-200.cm.vtr.net)
02:08.09blakeops0Anyone ever get "Got SIP response 488" when placing an outbound SIP call
02:11.05*** part/#asterisk dimas (~ds@vbc.elcom.ru)
02:14.06*** join/#asterisk clinthome (~clinthome@va-chrvlle-cad1-bdgrp5-8d-209.chvlva.adelphia.net)
02:25.27vppis it possible to use asterisk as a proxy gateway?
02:29.11*** join/#asterisk meppl (mephisto@pD9E689D1.dip.t-dialin.net)
02:29.19cypromisno
02:29.43vppohh
02:29.58*** join/#asterisk MrBelvedr (~tt@ip68-227-218-250.dc.dc.cox.net)
02:30.12vpp2 be sure we're on the same page
02:30.38vppi want to put it between my other gateway (quintum) and originating gateways
02:31.01vppbecos the quintum has compatibility problems, resulting in one way speech etc
02:31.31vppso the call flow i'm trying to achieve is
02:32.33vpp(Originating GW)  -- H.323 Sig and Voice --> Asterisk ----- H.323 Sig and Voice ----> Quintum
02:35.43ChkDigitAnd you've tested Quintum's H.323 with Asterisk?
02:36.06vppthats where i'm at now
02:36.15*** join/#asterisk anthm (~anthmct@CPE-69-76-83-52.wi.res.rr.com)
02:36.15*** mode/#asterisk [+o anthm] by ChanServ
02:36.20vppbut trying to figure out h323 config
02:36.49ChkDigitI haven't had luck with Asterisk H.323, but that was when I was really green...
02:37.10vppbasically i figure if i can get the asterisk to quintum leg working
02:37.24*** join/#asterisk kiokorobert1 (~kiokorobe@196.200.26.42)
02:37.40vppby setting compatible codec etc
02:38.01ChkDigitThe others should fall in-line...  Hopefully...
02:38.08vppyes
02:38.14vppbut even if they dont
02:38.29vppits easier to work with open source to resolve issues
02:38.33vppthen the quintum TAC
02:39.57vppbut the h323 config stuff isnt to clear
02:40.16vppi'm not to sure how i wld add the quintum gateway
02:40.27ChkDigitTo dial in>
02:40.29ChkDigit?
02:40.35vppdial out
02:40.50ChkDigitSo, Quintum is initiating the call?
02:40.59vppterminating
02:41.30vppSo say SJphone originates call to asterisk
02:41.39vppasterisk terminates call to quintum
02:42.25ChkDigitYou can put it in an extension for Asterisk to use an H323 channel
02:42.28vppas a gateway proxy (not gatekeeper, i.e. signalling only)
02:42.52vppok
02:42.57vppso add
02:43.09ChkDigitexten => _90XXX,1,Dial(H323/${EXTEN:2})
02:43.22vppahhh
02:43.26ChkDigitMay be what you're looking for...
02:43.42ChkDigitOooop, that would be for an incoming...
02:44.13ChkDigitexten => _.,1,Dial(H323/${EXTEN}@quintum)
02:44.24ChkDigitMore like that, in your incoming H323 context...
02:44.45vppok
02:45.45*** join/#asterisk _SMP_ (~SMP@pandora.burned.net)
02:46.20vppi get it
02:46.44vppso route any number via h323 to quintum gateway
02:47.12vpplemme try it
02:49.14*** join/#asterisk newmedian (~crowlther@Quebec-HSE-ppp230300.qc.sympatico.ca)
02:52.07*** join/#asterisk Vco (~Vco@S0106080020aa7650.wp.shawcable.net)
02:55.44TheEmperoranyone know how to delete voicemail from a users extension from cli?
02:56.45QwellTheEmperor: its all stored in /var/spool/asterisk
02:57.07TheEmperorQwell: can delete from there?
02:57.23QwellTheEmperor: should be able to
02:57.30TheEmperorthanks :)
02:57.51newlpresuming you're the same user as the asterisk daemon or higher priviledges.
02:58.04Qwellwell, yeah
02:59.06TheEmperorno way to delete from the asterisk cli?
02:59.11TheEmperori'm logging in as root
02:59.25newlNot from the daemon itself, no.
02:59.47newlThough I can't imagine it'd be too difficult to write an application for doing so.
03:00.24TheEmperoroh, i thought there might be a command to do so
03:01.51Vcois there some simple way to be able to exit Voicemailmail after it picks up, and be able to dial out to antoher SIP extension?
03:02.01Vcovoicemailmain rather
03:02.43vpphmmm odd May  1 04:00:14 NOTICE[9083]: channel.c:1842 set_format: Unable to find a path from g723 to ulaw
03:03.31vppin h323.conf i did
03:03.32vppdisallow=all
03:03.39vppallow=alaw
03:03.39vppallow=ulaw
03:03.59newlVco: # will get you out of voicemail but will unfortunately not return you to the main menu to enter another extension.  I'm sure you could whip something up for your VM context though.
03:04.05vpp[Test111]
03:04.06vpptype=h323
03:04.06vppcontext=incoming
03:04.35vppi originated the call using sj phone
03:08.46*** join/#asterisk r0d3nt (~RatMan@wsip-24-234-241-84.lv.lv.cox.net)
03:15.29*** join/#asterisk OzJames (~OzJames@CPE20320889-1842-1.gex.ncable.net.au)
03:17.45*** join/#asterisk L|NUX (~linux@202.5.145.58)
03:19.41WilliamKkp = goood!
03:21.26*** join/#asterisk Veto (mdkuser@cpe-66-69-38-192.satx.res.rr.com)
03:26.43newmediansomething like this, no? exten => _64.,1,Dial(SIP/${EXTEN:2}@mydestination) where the :1  strips one, and :2 strips two...
03:29.02at561nice -> http://headphones.mit.edu:8000/
03:30.26newmedianSpeaking of audio, has anyone set up streaming from a live stream (e.g. www.di.fm) for music-on-hold rather than pre-recorded files? If so, how did that go for you?
03:34.01WilliamKinteresting
03:34.30WilliamKnewmedian, not sure if it'd fall under CARP rules for broadcasting
03:34.39*** join/#asterisk pussfeller (~todd@t1-rtc-woodlawn.rtcol.com)
03:35.20*** join/#asterisk stevej (~chatzilla@mail.joneslinux.com)
03:35.25*** join/#asterisk r0d3nt (~RatMan@wsip-24-234-241-84.lv.lv.cox.net)
03:35.56newmedianTraditional PBXs usually have a line-in jack for pulling in audio from an FM radio. Do you feel it would be classified differently? Because it's digital it no longer flies under the radar?
03:36.23QwellIt still requires a license.
03:36.34QwellThey stream DOES have a license to broadcast, but you do not.
03:36.36WilliamKmy thoughts was it requires a license also
03:36.47Qwelljust read the licensing stuff a few days ago
03:37.19WilliamKit's been a while since I read it, but am too familiar with it
03:37.30newmedianThat might be an interesting "test case." The legality of "found audio" via a Radio versus a Digital Stream.  I know there's a type of precedent for "found audio," but that's usually invoked for film & television shoots.
03:37.39Qwellthe reason is, is because you're rebroadcasting it
03:38.03WilliamKnewmedian, actually several companies here in Dallas were sued over the last 3 years for doing it on their PBX's
03:38.31newmedianInteresting. I wonder whether Canadian law is different on that. We're not quote so repressed. ;)
03:38.35newmedianquite
03:38.42at561newmedian, that question comes up frequently. there's an implementation on voip-info.org but the main problem you'll run into is how the current musiconhold implementation blocks the child process which produces music if no one's on hold
03:39.00*** join/#asterisk JerJer[mobile] (~nonyobizn@45.210.5.249)
03:39.21Qwellnewmedian: http://www.bmi.com/licensing/business/groupb/faq/musiconhold_answers.asp
03:39.35at561so you should get it to either reestablish broken streams or have it throw away audio it can't write to stdout soon enough without blocking
03:39.57Qwell"Though radio stations are licensed with BMI to perform the music they broadcast, that agreement does not cover further public performance by those receiving the radio broadcast signal."
03:40.02Qwell"When radio music is used in music-on-hold, that use is a separate performance under the copyright law."
03:40.08newmedianBlech.
03:40.49at561playing cds at a bar is also restricted
03:41.00Qwellat561: no kidding?
03:41.07at561nope
03:41.17QwellSo, bars have to license jukeboxes?
03:41.25WilliamKcommercial establishment
03:41.29newmedian(Thanks for the link).  Here's a thought: Why not have a melodic generator, perhaps. Along the lines of Reason or a Korg Karma, producing unique chill/trance music that isn't under the thumb of BMI/ASCAP/etc. You could even overlay that audio with promos/announcements, etc.
03:42.51at561you can send them to eliza piping through viavoice
03:42.54newmedianWhile there is a plethora of indie music out there, it might be nice to have something more ambient happening that isn't to vocalist oriented.
03:42.59Qwellhmm
03:43.03Qwellrandomly generated music...
03:43.18QwellI wonder what would happen if it generated something that had already been done before
03:43.37Qwellif you could absolutely prove that the generator created it randomly, could you still be sued?
03:43.48at561what's "randomly" anyway
03:44.15Qwellwell, it wouldn't be completely random, it would have logic to make it actually sound like something
03:44.26newmedian(With the new Star Wars movie coming out, you could always use the MP3s from the zip here: http://www.chrisbouchard.co.uk/ from the Soundtrack of Star Wars: Revelations; I think he'd be okay with that. But Star Wars soundtrack might be a tad too geeky for everyday PBXers)
03:44.54newmedianYou can't be sued because they don't own the copyright to the music.
03:45.08QwellWho doesn't?
03:45.10newmedianBMI/ASCAP/blah blah can only sue you for music under their control.
03:45.24at561if you make your random music generator too simple it will start to produce britney spears tunes
03:45.30stevejA million monkees at a million keyboards? It would depend on what you use as the definition of a copy.
03:45.31QwellI mean anybody.  If your generator makes something that is strikingly similar to something...
03:46.11newmedianThere have been cases in the US where certain progressions were similar to others and lawsuits happened, but we're moving into the realm of the theoretical. Unless you deliberately introduce riffs from well known songs, you shouldn't have any problem.
03:46.21Nethabi think his point is that there are only so many combinations of notes that the human brain finds musical
03:46.37Nethaband therefore there are only a finite possible number of songs
03:46.42QwellThere is so much crap out there, that "random" could easily do something like another song
03:46.45QwellNethab: yeah, exactly
03:46.57at561yeah i wonder how well the song consisting of 4:33 of silence is protected
03:47.00newmedianThoughtcrime. Doubleplus ungood Crimespeak.
03:47.25NethabI recorded that silence on a Sennheiser Evolution 855 I know it's mine!
03:47.46Nethabthat's like copyrighting the color white
03:48.10Nethab"that particular combination of red and blue and green is MY color of white!"
03:48.31newmedianI always thought the ambient sound in Star Trek Next Gen from in the corridors was a nice sound. When there's no music, no talking, no spfx, just the white? noise with the ambient properties of the corridors. mmm.
03:48.51Nethabhehehe comfort noise
03:48.53stevejNo, it's mine, and it's cyan, magenta, and blue!
03:48.56newmedianRed vs Blue? http://www.redvsblue.com/home.php
03:49.23NethabI don't fight, i'm a pacifist...
03:49.30Nethabyour a thing that babys suck on?
03:50.09newmedianNo, that's a diesel. A Vin Diesel.
03:50.18Nethabno dude that's pedophile
03:50.24Vcoo.O
03:51.09Nethabspeaking of Tom Cruise
03:52.02Vcowow..this channel is much less linear than i remember
03:52.16pussfellerplay the opening riff to 7 nation army over and over and over and
03:52.17Nethablinear, no no no we prefer interleaving
03:52.29newmedianhe's inter, and you're leaving
03:52.55newmedianI think it's just that time of night when there's a nice cognitive dissonance going on.
03:53.08Nethabi can't believe i witnessed a heated discussion by all the ops of this channel earlier today
03:53.19at561harvard and yale are playing rap. mit is playing live deerhoof
03:53.27at561what about?
03:53.42*** join/#asterisk gambolputty (~gambolput@cblmdm65-221-51-80.buckeye-express.com)
03:53.50Nethababout the FSF and a $1000 licensing fee
03:53.55newmedian?
03:54.17Nethabsomething to do with AGI and the manager interface
03:54.18Qwellresearch fee, basically
03:54.23newmedianouch.
03:54.27*** join/#asterisk PCadach (~paul@www.east.telecom.kz)
03:54.36at561maybe that's what pays for the deerhoof concert
03:55.09newmedianthey'd be deerfeated before they started
03:55.14Vcorevisiting my earlier question....would it be possible to leave ..say...a 2 or so second wait time for Voicemailmain to kick in after pixking up a Zap channel, , and give myself a window to dial to a SIP extension?
03:55.31Vcoerr..picking up ..rather
03:55.32*** join/#asterisk m8rix|DND (Miranda@c80-217-74-84.cm-upc.chello.se)
03:56.12Nethabi use WaitExten
03:56.19newmedianWhy not do a Background playing a silence wav of a certain length (2 secs) that detects a dtmf and branches to an extension, and when times out goes to Voicemailmain
03:56.48Nethabwaitexten will wait the number of seconds given for an extension then move on if it doesn't get one
03:57.05newmedianWell, if you want to do it the proper way, sure. be that way. ;)
03:57.10Nethabha
03:57.38Vcoslick...
03:57.41Vcothanks..
03:59.38newmedianI find that the nitty gritty implementation details seem to be spread out all over the place. Lots at the Wiki, of course, but individual dial plans, extensions, etc. are found all over parts of the web with useful tricks, plans, macros, etc.
04:00.07Nethabbecause we all have different ways to do the same thing, and there's no right way to do it,
04:00.09newmedianHave I just missed some "central repository" of plans which document concisely everyone's plans & configs?
04:00.23newmedian(Sounds like Perl)
04:00.31Nethabprecisely
04:00.51newmedianWhat would be nice would be a "Asterisk Cookbook"
04:01.01Nethabsome people like to do it in their dial plan, some like to make buttons on their phone do it
04:01.30Nethabwhat asterisk needs are a very simplified sample config
04:01.31vpphmm i keep getting
04:01.31vppMay  1 04:59:59 NOTICE[2002]: channel.c:1842 set_format: Unable to find a path from g723 to alaw
04:01.37vppeven tho nothing is using g723
04:01.41Nethabit's trying to convert but it can't
04:02.05vppbut both the originating and terminating should be using alaw
04:02.08vpp(g711)
04:02.30vppi just did
04:02.30vppdisallow=all
04:02.37vppallow=alaw
04:02.42vppin my h232.conf
04:02.48vpp*h323.conf
04:02.57Nethabwhat version of asterisk, i had that problem several months ago
04:03.02vppoh
04:03.05newmedianI'd like to duplicate some of the functionality of the (becoming defunct) Primeline service, for example. And other value added features. And I'm sure I'm just reinventing the wheel, and it irks me, because I keep stumbling across good sections of Asterisk code.
04:04.40vpphmm
04:04.40vppAsterisk CVS-HEAD-04/29/05-04:45:14 built by root@localhost.localdomain on a i686 running Linux
04:04.46vpphow do i show the version
04:04.53Qwellshow version
04:04.56vppi used CVS to get it the other day
04:04.56VcoThanks guys...exactly the step i needed....
04:05.00vppyeah thats what it said
04:05.03Nethabare you kidding, the only way for noobs to ask questions is to form them in the form of a complaint
04:05.39newmedianuh, there's an unpleasant implication there ;) but... okay.
04:06.53Nethabfor example "Why does the manager API suck so bad"
04:07.09Nethabthat's how you ask about your problem with the manger api
04:07.15vpphmm maybe i should download a stable version and forget CVS ?
04:07.22vppwhat version u running?
04:07.30Nethabi use HEAD too
04:07.44newlYa know what would be really nice in CVS?  A real live ChangeLog, not this poorly maintained one. ;)
04:07.56Qwellnewl: volunteer
04:08.17Nethabwait there's a changelog?
04:09.00NethabI think there's a changelog for a release, but I use HEAD so it's usually way behind the times for my system
04:09.02newlQwell: Quite honestly, if the developers used it properly and submitted along with their code commits it wouldn't normally be an issue.
04:09.25newmedianHas anyone used VMWare to set up virtual networks to play with Asterisk in a "sandbox" configuration? I understand with version 5 you can introduce artificial network conditions in the virtual networking to simulate latency problems, connectivity issues, etc.
04:09.28QwellWhen I code, I can't be bothered to document
04:09.53vpphmm any ideas?
04:10.21vppit looks like its ignoring its own codec settings in h323.conf
04:10.24newmedianAnd when does IAXy version 2 hit the streets? And what's the difference (whine, whine) ;)
04:10.40vppalso ignoring the ones on the terminating gateway set g711 only
04:10.48vppis there anywhere else the codecs are set on asterisk?
04:10.54newlQwell: Same here, however the projects I contribute to, ChangeLog is quite handy to have current.  e.g. Someone pops in here saying that they updated today and two days ago some feature worked.  It is quite easy to hit the ChangeLog and figure out what happened between those two days instead of sifting through a cvs diff.
04:12.35blakeops0Documentation is the thing that seperates open source projects and the real world
04:15.52newmedianI find there's a bit of pig headedness too, usually from the people who started projects. Not always, just occasionally. I've tried to contribute and have found bugs/problems but have had a few experiences where issues were disregarded and the maintainer pulled ego trip etc. denying problems, ignoring issues. They took their toys and went home, and I got tired and stopped banging my head against the wall. Thankfully I haven't tr
04:15.54newmedianmuch of that.
04:16.43Qwellnewmedian: yeah, I know a few projects like that...
04:17.01Qwellone of said projects, the original author is gone though
04:17.27*** join/#asterisk file (~file@mctn1-6880.nb.aliant.net)
04:17.40QwellI hear you made muffins?
04:17.43Nethabactually a buddy of mine uses ESX server as a full production environment
04:17.50newmedianAh, nice.
04:18.10Nethabcreate an entire three tiered dmz in a 1u pizza box
04:18.13newmedianI'm about to upgrade to 5 Workstation.
04:18.20Qwellnewmedian: let us know how it is
04:18.21newmedian(personally)
04:19.15QwellI want to try 5, but can't be bothered to uninstall 4
04:19.15newmedianSure. I'm planning on trying some Asterisk related sandboxing using 5. I'll let y'all know how that goes.
04:19.42Nethabonly problem is how do get hardphones into your vlan
04:20.03newmedianThe only irritating thing is that they don't allow Crossgrades. My primary O/S when I purchased VMWare in the dawn mists of time was for Windows, and I'd prefer it to be the Linux as primary O/S. I work with multi-platforms, but I've reached the end of my rope with Microsoft.
04:20.46Nethabwindows doesn't make a good vmware host
04:20.53Nethabespecially after XP SP2
04:21.15newmedianI'm a 2000 user. Heavily tweaked/modified.  I have resisted moving to XP.
04:21.37newmedianI run it virtually, when I have to, to diagnose problems for clients.
04:21.42newmedian(XP, that is)
04:22.32ManxPower~docs
04:22.33jbotDocumentation can be found at http://digium.com/index.php?menu=documentation or http://www.digium.com/handbook-draft.pdf or #asterisk-doc, or http://www.voip-info.org/wiki-Asterisk, or http://www.asteriskdocs.org
04:22.35newmedianWell, I imagine you could dedicate a network adapter and tunnel in the hard phones. What might be nice is a UDP & TCP replay injection for SIP.
04:23.17ManxPower~mailinglist
04:23.18jbotmailinglist is, like, Search Asterisk mailing lists by prepending site:lists.digium.com to your Google search.  Browse the mailing list archive at http://lists.digium.com/
04:23.44newmedianHmm. A SIP simulation tests in a VMWare 5 network with virtual networking problems. Might be interesting.
04:24.22*** join/#asterisk r0d3nt|m (~RatMan@wsip-24-234-241-84.lv.lv.cox.net)
04:25.25newmedianAnyone here ever build the Zapata boards, or everyone has come in at the Digium-purchase level?
04:25.42newmedianI suppose I mean the PCI one.
04:29.45Nethabi wonder when digium will release the PCI-X version
04:30.23NuggetYeah.  I want a pci-x version and osx zaptel drivers.  :)
04:30.43*** join/#asterisk r0d3nt (~RatMan@wsip-24-234-241-84.lv.lv.cox.net)
04:31.27Nethabi want a bunny
04:31.47Nethaband a pony
04:31.48newmedianhare today and gone tomorrow
04:32.04Nethabcause if your gonna wish for world peace, you might as well wish for a pony while your at it
04:33.24newmedianDo you know what the Digium/Asterisk policy is regarding the use of the name Asterisk? Specifically I'm curious about people using the word Asterisk inside of a domain name with Asterisk related content.
04:41.25Nethabi don't have any idea
04:43.42Nethabhow many people have polycom's and cisco's
04:43.48Qwell3
04:43.53Nethab3 people
04:43.58Qwellyes
04:44.12Nethabi guess that's why everyone is unloading cisco's on ebay
04:44.43Qwellits all the same guy
04:44.47Nethabbut I never see polycoms on there
04:45.03Nethabsame guy 10 logins?
04:45.06Qwellyes
04:45.10CeNTauR^6what do you guys think aboutt he sipura handsets?
04:45.28Nethabthe 841?
04:45.32CeNTauR^6yea
04:46.13Nethabnever heard of it
04:46.28CeNTauR^6one of the distributers here ins Aus siad they had a very high failure rate
04:46.53QwellI think atacomm was saying the same thing about the earlier models
04:46.55Nethabwell all i can say is the 3 people have are Cisco Polycom and Snom
04:47.13Nethabas far as hard phones go
04:47.30Nethabalthough you know Cisco just bought Sipura
04:47.40CeNTauR^6no i didnt know that
04:47.45Nethabyeah this week
04:47.55CeNTauR^6well there goes their prices.....
04:48.06Nethaband the AC adapter
04:48.19Nethabthat was a cisco 79X0 joke
04:48.19CeNTauR^6all the decent handsets in Aus are $400 AUD
04:48.28*** join/#asterisk file (~file@mctn1-6880.nb.aliant.net)
04:48.47Nethabhow long till cisco sells the sipura devices without an AC adapter file
04:49.14newlEven though the AUD is alot better against the USD prices here never seem to change accordingly.
04:49.16Qwellselling the adapter seperate makes sense
04:49.17CeNTauR^6lol they havent done that witht he linksys stuff yet
04:49.24fileugh taking apart my Mac Mini makes me sad
04:49.52newlfile: You would have felt more sad had you paid Apple to do the upgrades for you. :D
04:50.02QwellNethab: a) they're trying to promot PoE, b) people who do have PoE won't need an adapter
04:50.12Qwellpromote*
04:50.37Nethabthen sell one with and without
04:50.48Nethaband how about putting PoE in their linksys
04:51.15CeNTauR^6yeah... well for a home VoIP solution there isnt much out there in the way of decent affordable gear
04:51.20Nethabnot as an endpoint like their wireless accesspoints
04:51.22Qwellhas linksys even made wired products lately?
04:51.34CeNTauR^6yeah
04:51.48CeNTauR^6i have the Linksys PAP2
04:51.49*** part/#asterisk bkw_ (~brian@bkw.developer.and.friend.of.asterisk)
04:51.53Nethabif linksys had built in PoE then that's make sense
04:51.58CeNTauR^6thats the sipura 2000 clone
04:52.20Nethabthat's why the linksys division bought sipura the company
04:52.27paulsenIIRC, linksys have wireless routers with PoE
04:52.37Qwellpaulsen: Thats my joke.  You can't have it! :p
04:52.37paulsenor they are on the way
04:52.51Nethabthey have wireless accesspoints with PoE recievers so you don't have to plug them in
04:52.59Nethabi don't think they have PoE servers
04:53.15ManxPowerSIPura had a good change to make good phones.
04:53.18paulsenPoE servers? as in switches?
04:53.28Nethabwell providers/ clients
04:54.24Nethabthe problem with PoE is they have to be downstream you can't cascade PoE over multiple switches
04:54.43Qwellwith PoE, you use standard CAT5, right?
04:54.44Nethaband the length of the cable run is an issue too
04:54.47Nethabyes
04:54.53Qwellsame wiring?
04:55.05Qwelllike, I could take an existing cable, and put it on a PoE net?
04:55.12paulsenyes
04:55.18Nethabyes they either use the unused pairs, or modulate inband and have a chip to seperate them at the endpoint
04:55.19paulsenit only needs cat5
04:55.35QwellWhat if your switch is PoE and your endpoint isn't?
04:55.37paulsenI thought it was unused pairs only
04:55.39QwellWill it die a horrible death?
04:55.46paulsen(since you cant have PoE and GigE at the same time)
04:56.02Qwellgige uses all 8?
04:56.02Nethabif it's unused pins, it MIGHT be ok, if those pins aren't (stupidly) grounded on the endpojnt
04:56.04paulsenQwell: it's probably some kind of sensing mechanism in plase
04:56.06paulsenQwell: yes
04:56.22Qwellpaulsen: ahh, like, "Are you a PoE device?" "No?  ok, I better not blast you then"
04:56.43paulsenprobably
04:56.45paulsenI dont know for sure
04:56.49Qwellmakes sense
04:56.54paulsenbut what I do know is that you can only use 10/100mbit with PoE
04:57.00paulsenand that it uses the unused pairs
04:57.11Qwellso PoE uses 1, or 2 pairs?
04:57.16paulsenthat im not sure about
04:57.27paulsenI would imagine two pairs
04:57.28Nethab1 pair is all that's needed
04:57.36Nethabhot and gound
04:57.36paulsensince you dont want ground and positive pair'ed
04:57.46QwellYou know, I like that I can ask random network questions in here, and generally get an answer, heh
04:57.56CeNTauR^6:)
04:58.00paulsenmost freebsd admins have some degree of network knowledge
04:58.11paulsenfor example, alot of us admin cisco gear aswell
04:58.14paulsenfor some unknown reason
04:58.20Qwellyeah..
04:58.25Nethaband most monkeys have a rudimentary knowledge of physics to target their poop throwing
04:59.22paulsenhaha
04:59.24mepplgute nacht
04:59.33Nethabgood morning
04:59.47Qwellguten yacht
04:59.47meppl;)
04:59.49meppl;)
05:00.27newlguten abend
05:00.56Qwellugh, don't say that word
05:01.13*** join/#asterisk ManxPower (~eric@adsl-35-236-60.msy.bellsouth.net)
05:01.24Nethabmanx
05:02.17CeNTauR^6are there any easy to use billing systems?
05:02.22vpparghhhh. done a make update and stil getting
05:02.22vpp<PROTECTED>
05:02.28Nethabeasy to use?
05:02.40CeNTauR^6easy to setup rather
05:02.59CeNTauR^6i have the CDR in a mysql database
05:03.02Nethabwhat phone are you using
05:03.24vppwho me?  SJ phone
05:03.24CeNTauR^6just im crap at programming
05:03.26*** join/#asterisk coppice (~chatzilla@60.195.17.210.dyn.pacific.net.hk)
05:04.58*** join/#asterisk jcollie (~jcollie@dsl-ppp239.isunet.net)
05:05.20vppterminating to quintum
05:05.27CeNTauR^6so i was looking for somthing that will calculate call costs based on the destination
05:07.43Nethabcan you determine which channel is trying to use g723
05:07.52Nethabby doing sip show channel
05:09.12vppbut its using H.323
05:10.02vppfrom the SJ phone log i can see the incoming/outgoing as A-Law G711
05:10.10vppsorry u-law
05:12.54Nuggetvpp fought the law and the law won.
05:14.19Nethabso you know that the sjphone isn't trying to use g723
05:14.42vppyes.. the only codec enabled on it is G711, and i see in the log that its using G711
05:14.53CeNTauR^6no takers on the billing question?
05:14.58vppand the only codec on the quintum is g711
05:17.54Nethabhave you tried the wiki for billing
05:18.46CeNTauR^6yeah looking though all the search results now
05:18.53CeNTauR^6just thought you guys may have a recommendation
05:19.46Nethabnah i don't have any paying customers
05:19.47vppNethab, i read there is a way to make a test call from the console?
05:19.58vppbut i dont remembe the specifics
05:20.08Nethabyes, but it requires a good setup of oss or also on the system
05:20.13Nethabalsa
05:20.22vppoh
05:20.24fileugh tired
05:20.34Nethabin otherwords a working sound card
05:20.46Nethabdoes your asterisk box have a working sound card
05:20.53vppi cant do it anyway, forget the speach, just to see if it brings the leg up
05:20.55Nethaband can you get sounds to play through it
05:20.58vppyes it should have
05:21.09vppbut i havnt tested it
05:21.20fileyay Tiger
05:21.34Nethabyou got tiger working on your laptop?
05:22.10QwellI have Tiger in PearPC in Windows in VMWare
05:22.14fileI don't even have a mac laptop unfortunately
05:22.16fileI have a mac mini
05:22.19Nethabvpp if you had another system you could test call the other sip phone
05:22.21fileit's installing as we speak
05:22.35filereally cool - bought the bluetooth/airport express card, and wireless keyboard+mouse
05:22.41Nethabso you on your laptop installing tiget on your mac
05:22.43fileso only cables going to it are power, monitor, and speakers
05:22.53DaminQwell: How is that working for you? ;)
05:23.03QwellDamin: dunno, I made that all up
05:23.11Nethabwow out of the wood work they come
05:23.19Qwellslow as a dog though, I'd bet :p
05:23.24newlQwell: that's almost as bad as Windows->WinUAE->Shapeshifter->VirtualPC :)
05:23.35Qwellwhat are winuae and shapeshifter?
05:23.53newlWinUAE is an Amiga emulator, Shapeshifter is a Mac emulator.
05:24.27Qwellan amiga mac um?
05:24.30Qwellemu
05:25.00Nethablinux -> vmware windows -> virtiual pc  freebsd -> basilisk mac od
05:25.08Nethabos
05:25.15Qwellmac hardware > tiger
05:25.18newlQwell: Yep.  68k Mac emulator.
05:25.24DaminWow..
05:25.32Nethabmy imagination -> pr0n
05:25.40DaminCalifornia Pizza Kitchen Frozen Pizza ROCKS!
05:26.25Nethabyou eat it frozen?
05:26.45DaminNethab: No.. there is this thing called an oven?
05:26.49coppiceit wouldn't be like a rock otherwise
05:28.09Daminhttp://www.cpk.com/grocery/index.cfm
05:28.35DaminA taste of Bangkok brings spicy peanut ginger sauce and scrumptious sesame chicken satay to the top of a pizza finished with bean sprouts, carrots and green onions.
05:28.50DaminIt was damn good!
05:29.37coppice"Jamaican Jerk Chicken" - they make a special pizza for stupid Jamaicans? :-\
05:29.59Nethabhe's not stupid, he's a jerk
05:30.27Nethabor in otherwords a girl magnet
05:30.36Nethabthey're all attracted to jerks
05:31.04iq_Any proxy server for Asterisk Media?
05:32.20Nethabdefine media
05:34.05*** join/#asterisk Xen^ (linux@202.5.131.19)
05:34.21DaminNethab: A CD-Rom w/ Asterisk Source code on it?
05:34.22iq_SIP is signaling and Codecs/Audio is media ... thats what I think :)
05:35.09Xen^can some one tell me which ip phone is best for testing ?
05:35.34CoaxDum
05:35.34DaminXen^: They are all good for testing.
05:35.40Nethabasterisk is a media proxy as well as a signaling controller
05:35.44CoaxDthats like asking.. "Which brand oxygen is best for saving lives?"
05:35.46Xen^Damin : name one
05:35.58DaminXen^: You can test with anything, including tin cans and string..
05:35.59Xen^CoaxD : hmm
05:36.00Nethabmost people use X-lite for testing cause it's free and well known
05:36.05iq_Nethab, asterisk is proxy ?
05:36.17CoaxD<-- uses x-lite for sure
05:36.20coppiceThe buggiest ones give you the greatest potential for testing :-)
05:36.21CoaxD(for testing)
05:36.23Xen^Damin : i need one cheap IP phone man thats why i am asking
05:36.23Nethabyes, it can proxy and transcode between codecs
05:36.39Nethaband it's also a server phones register
05:36.39Xen^CoaxD : thats softphone i need hardphone :)
05:36.40CoaxDXen: if its jut for testing, dude, grandstream 101
05:36.47CoaxDXen: Why do you need hardphone for testing?
05:36.52CoaxDXen: For god sakes, ITS TESTING
05:36.59Nethabhard phone or soft phone
05:37.00DaminXen^: I just plug a microphone into my PC and make beeping noises approximating modem tones..
05:37.02iq_Nethab, its great to know.
05:37.11Nethabi'm glad
05:37.12Xen^hmm
05:37.23NethabX-Lite is a free softphone
05:37.36Nethabhardware isn't cheap though
05:37.41Nuggetsure it is.
05:37.48Nuggetyou can buy a hardware sip phone for $65.
05:37.58Xen^i have X-PRO, eyeBeam and i tested all :)
05:38.04Xen^and works great for me
05:38.08Nethabbut for testing purposes if you used that you'd be put off right awayt
05:38.24Nethabcheap hard phones are just that, cheap
05:38.31iq_Nethab, how can asterisk work as proxy?
05:38.46DaminGet a Polycom IP 500 for $185. It's a great phone.
05:38.52Xen^iq_ : its sip proxy man :)
05:38.54Nethabit sits in the path of the RTP stream
05:39.07iq_Xen^, no it is not :)
05:39.08Nethaband can forward it
05:39.13iq_Nethab, it does not make it proxy
05:39.21iq_Nethab, SER is proxy
05:39.35Nethabit's not a sip proxy, it's a media proxy
05:39.45iq_Nethab, what is a media proxy?
05:39.48Nuggetasterisk is not a sip proxy.
05:39.53tainted-when is the best time to get ahold of ppl at sixtel?
05:39.58Nuggetit's difficult and a bad idea to try to make asterisk be a sip proxy
05:40.01Nethabit sits in the path of the voice stream and can translate it to other formats
05:40.21iq_Nethab, how would you make asterisk proxy media without authentication, etc. ?
05:41.08Nethabyou use asterisk as the sip server, and when the rtp leg is established asterisk sets itself as the destination
05:41.27iq_Nethab, a media proxy should not require signalling/authentication
05:42.34Nethabasterisk doesn't require authentication, but most people require it to prevent abuse
05:43.10iq_Nethab, how would I configure that ? No registration, no authentication, just proxy the media?
05:43.50Nethabyou have to initiate the call through asterisk as the server, when you make the call the sip uri has asterisk set as the realm
05:44.13Nethaband the extension is routed to a peer in sip.conf
05:44.15iq_Nethab, where does SIP come from ?
05:44.32Nethaba phone makes a call by requesting a sip uri
05:44.38iq_Nethab, SIP is not media
05:44.53Nethabsip:<phonenumber>@server.com
05:45.02iq_Nethab, :)
05:45.14iq_Nethab, okay, one of us need to do some study
05:45.44Nethabi'm used to helping beginers here
05:45.54Nethabmost of them don't know what a uri is
05:45.56iq_Nethab, its great thing... :)
05:46.08Nethabso i explain everything
05:46.32Nethabmaybe not so well, but the rest of them here aren't speaking right now
05:46.35iq_Nethab, its a good thing to do :) ... I have about 5/6 Asterisk machines running. few in Asia and some in USA
05:47.02iq_Nethab, my problem is that I need to figure out a way to resolve the NAT issue
05:47.17Nethabcanreinvite = no on all peers
05:47.27iq_Nethab, yeah :)
05:47.28Nethabthat's how to stop re inviting
05:47.45iq_Nethab, its all set
05:47.47Nethabso asterisk stays in the media path
05:47.57iq_Nethab, actually, its a little more than basic newbie issue
05:47.58Xen^Iftikhar Nethab is a good guy :)
05:48.14iq_Xen^, who are you ?
05:48.14Nethabwhatever an iftikhar is
05:48.24iq_Nethab, I am an Iftikhar ;)
05:48.36Nethabi see
05:48.37Xen^guess ;)
05:48.43Nethabdo you taste like chicken?
05:48.57Xen^Nethab : iq_ name is iptikhar :)
05:49.08Xen^*iftikhar
05:49.10iq_Nethab, you're welcome to try if you're a girl
05:49.19Xen^lolz
05:49.21Xen^hehe
05:49.28iq_Nethab, IQ = Iftikhar Qureshi
05:49.37Nethabi thought it meant he's smart
05:49.38Xen^yupz
05:49.53iq_Nethab, dont worry. it does not ;)
05:50.17Nethabso you can't get asterisk to stay in the media path
05:50.20*** join/#asterisk R-Guy (~ron-mirc@24.87.100.41)
05:52.13iq_Nethab, some of the clients who're behind NAT using ATAs or IP Phones do not work properly
05:52.16Nethabcould it be another native bridging bug
05:52.20*** join/#asterisk LennonNZ (LennonNZ@port-219-88-247-208.jet.net.nz)
05:52.24LennonNZevening people
05:52.28iq_Nethab, no audio
05:53.02iq_Nethab, at times audio is in one direction
05:53.14Nethabone direction audio is a very common nat problem
05:53.35iq_Nethab, how do you solve it and what about no audio at all?
05:53.37LennonNZare there any cheap E1 cards I can use for Asterisk?
05:53.48Qwelldigium sells an E1 card
05:53.57iq_Qwell, do they :O ?
05:54.02LennonNZyes. but they are ^%*&& expensive
05:54.05Qwelldigium.com > Hardware
05:54.13Nethabi've found that the most important part is to make sure all your rtp ports defined in rtp.conf are publicly accessible
05:54.41iq_Nethab, which are 10k to 20k, right?
05:54.50Nethabif T1 cards were cheap then the phone company would have to lower T1 line prices
05:54.59Nethabthe ports are configurable
05:55.12Nethabbasically it's one port per call leg
05:55.18Xen^Nethab : how can we check these ports from clients :)
05:55.20iq_LennonNZ, cheap cards are cheap. Digium is good with good support
05:55.25Nethabso you can adjust based on approximate call volume
05:55.25LennonNZthe guy in NZ who sells them.. well orders them from overseas when if I order via him. so its cheaper to buy them myself from overseas
05:55.39LennonNZthere is no real "wholesale person" in NZ for the digium stuff
05:55.43*** join/#asterisk firestrm (firestrm@S010600047577bccd.gv.shawcable.net)
05:56.37iq_Nethab, all of the machines have all ports open
05:56.40LennonNZie If I want one tomorrow.. it would be impossible
05:56.56LennonNZso I'mlooking for an alternative source of E1 cards which work in Asterisk
05:56.57Nethabwell the best way to test is to turn on rtp debug in the console and see if any packets are being sent or recieved
05:57.01Nethabtcpdump is good too
05:57.15Nethabsangoma makes some, but their not cheap either
05:57.20vppwhats the difference between 'peer' and 'h323' in the h323.conf ?
05:57.22iq_Nethab, TCP dump to check that ports are opeN ?
05:57.39Nethabto see if packets are making it through silly head
05:57.59iq_Nethab, I think Xen^ question was different
05:58.01firestrmreverse engineering is fun!! :)
05:58.04iq_Nethab, he said from "clients"
05:58.19Nethabnmap has a udp ping mechanism
05:58.27firestrmi fugured out that a digium  s100 costs less than $20.00 to build..
05:58.28Xen^hmm
05:58.40iq_Nethab, yes nmap can be used i guess
05:58.40Xen^Nethab : i have person from Syria
05:58.49Xen^he try to connect my US box but he can't
05:58.55Nethabyou bought a person from syria?
05:59.03iq_Xen^, ask him to use satellite phone they're cheaper
05:59.08Nethabhow much, and does he have a sister
05:59.11Xen^because he is using VPN
05:59.12Xen^what i will do so he will connect to my machine ?
05:59.21Nethabouch vpn is not good
05:59.24Xen^wt
05:59.25Xen^wtf
05:59.26firestrmhet miister.. can i buy your siiistor?
05:59.27Nethabdouble the latency
06:00.27Xen^i did
06:00.29Xen^but no use
06:00.37Xen^Nethab : you are good person :)
06:00.43iq_Nethab, firestrm is asking you something
06:00.56Nethabhuh what? all i saw was buying someones sister
06:01.28firestrmlol
06:02.28iq_Nethab, since u r in business in buying so maybe he thought you might wanna sell too
06:02.34iq_Nethab, anyways, maybe we should respect each other
06:02.54Nethabr-e-s-p-e-c-t find out what it means to me...
06:03.11iq_Nethab, thanks for help
06:03.12*** join/#asterisk BoRiS (boris@S01060040ca1e5b54.wp.shawcable.net)
06:03.29Nethabno problem, not like i actually did anything
06:03.43iq_Nethab, atleast you tried
06:03.56Nethabi just talk and talk and talk, until people figure it out for themselves then they say thank you
06:03.57firestrmhey guys, ive allmost got the s100's figured out.. not much to em.. $20.00 worth of parts.. the tdm400 board looks a little more funkey though.. might take me a week or so..
06:04.03Xen^Nethab : can i pvt with you for a while ?
06:04.28Nethab$20? i'd think the ASIC would be at least that much
06:04.44vpphmm i changed it from h323 to peer, and now i dont get the translation error
06:04.52Nethabcause they produce in such small quantities
06:04.53vppbut i also still dont get any voice
06:05.03firestrmNethab, no asic on the s100's, there is on the tdm400 though
06:05.10Nethaboh hmm
06:05.41firestrms100, is only an si3210 proslic
06:05.51firestrm+ a few support parts
06:06.01firestrmsi3210 is $8.00
06:06.11Nethabyes a $100 capacitor that must be it
06:06.24Nethabtritatium gold plating
06:06.50firestrmlol.. must be government certified capacitor's
06:07.03Xen^Nethab : can you give your aol id ?
06:07.19Nethabaol, who uses aol?
06:07.35Nethabno government certified goes to the lowest bidder
06:08.17iq_Nethab, where r u located?
06:08.26Nethabi'm over here where are you
06:08.40iq_Nethab, Nebraska
06:08.41firestrmNethab, i reverse engineered for curiosity, and to see how much they are making off of this gear.. and also because im very gifted at reverse engineering hardware, but now that i can see how much they are marking it up.. hmm methinks the schematic will be posted somewhere, thats a ripoff what they are making off of it..
06:09.10Nethabwell you figure that's their only source of income
06:09.24Nethabit has to pay a salary
06:09.34firestrmmust be..
06:09.46Nethaband at my last job 43% markup was too low
06:09.57vppfirestrm: whats in the s100?
06:10.04vppjust an SLIC?!
06:10.09Nethaband razor blades cost pennies to make but cost a dollor or more
06:10.18iq_Nethab, so where is here?
06:10.41Nethabwhere is here with a w at the front yes
06:10.52firestrmvpp, si3210 + a few support componants, transistors, caps, one big honking coil (for the -48v dc-dc converter) thats about it..
06:11.23Nethabis the si3210 have the dtmf and callerid decoding in it
06:11.35vpphmm interesting
06:11.44firestrmvpp, the schematic is allmost verbatum of Silicon Image's appnote on the part..
06:11.44vppthe s100 is the one that has an ethernet port for AIX?
06:11.47drumkillathere is obviously more cost involved than the hardware.
06:12.02vppi use the silvertel SLIC's myself
06:12.04vppsmaller
06:12.07vppuse less power
06:12.12Nethabprobably licensing fees to silicon image
06:12.25firestrmvpp, ya i like silvertel too..
06:12.32Nethaband they probably fab out the building
06:12.43Nethabdon't do it in house
06:12.46vppfirestrm.. its FXS tho right?
06:12.51vppor FXO ?
06:13.07firestrmNethab, from the quality of the assembly, they are not paying much.. terrable qa
06:13.19firestrmvpp, fxs
06:13.23vppok
06:13.24Nethabheh have you seen the inside of a grandstream, and they charge 65
06:13.46vppi want a fxo
06:13.47filesoooooooooo tired
06:13.57iq_file, no date?
06:13.58Nethabis the tiger in the cage now?
06:14.05filesoooooooooooooooooooooooooo tired
06:14.10firestrmdoes it have solder icesicles hanging off of the pins? my s100m does.. allmost shorts to next pin
06:14.38Nethabthat's what happens when you go the custom hardware route
06:14.39firestrmvpp, fxo is even simpler..
06:15.00BoRiSfile!!!!!!!
06:15.26fileBoRiS: hiiiiii
06:15.28Nethabfxo has less signalling to generate
06:15.28coppicefirestrm: $20 is way too high
06:15.31vppyeah i know it should be..
06:15.34firestrmvpp, all the fxo consists of is an isolation ic pair
06:15.39vppbut they dont have an fxo yet do they?
06:15.39BoRiSHow are you?
06:15.44filetired, barely concious
06:15.54Nethabso am I, i'm going to bed soon
06:15.58filebut I got bluetooth+wifi for my Mac... plus wireless keyboard+mouse... and Tiger
06:16.00firestrmcoppice, i was giving them the benifit of the doubt..
06:16.00fileso all is well
06:16.13BoRiSI am watching some cheap thriller movie on Scream and feeling pretty tired/bored.
06:16.18Nethabyou bought a mini to go with your tiger
06:16.28firestrmvpp, fxo is pert x100m
06:16.29fileI already had a mac mini, bought it during Spring VON
06:16.33vppahh
06:16.37vppgot a diagram :d
06:16.40vpp:D even
06:16.48Nethabyou were at spring von?
06:16.50drumkillafile: I was there!
06:16.52fileyes
06:17.03Nethabi was there too, but a few miles away
06:17.04filedrumkilla: yes you were!!!
06:17.05firestrmvpp, schematic is allmost finished for s100m, nothing yet for x100m..
06:17.23vppcool.. when do u think u'll have it done?
06:17.35vppno rush or anything.. but maybe u could email me it if i'm not here :d
06:17.51Nethabare they planning on having any more VON or astricon in san jose again?
06:17.59drumkillaNethab: no clue
06:18.04fileNethab: not to my knowledge
06:18.07filenow, gooooooooooooooodnight
06:18.11Nethabnight
06:18.13BoRiSnight night
06:18.17Nethabcircular file
06:18.22firestrmvpp, i'll probbly post it somewhere..
06:18.30vppcool
06:18.44firestrmvpp, with a layout file for the home builders out there..
06:18.54vppgreat
06:21.19firestrmvpp, i want to figure out the daughterboard interface so i can determine the hackability of the tdm400
06:21.51vppit only depends on what chips are on it, and if u can/need to get the code out
06:22.16*** join/#asterisk dash (~washort@adsl-159-172-100.bhm.bellsouth.net)
06:23.11vpphmm i'm seeing remote RTP port as 0.0.0.0 on the quintum side
06:23.14vppwtf
06:25.44*** join/#asterisk bmg505 (~leon@rndf-146-22-219.telkomadsl.co.za)
06:27.54vppand it works
06:27.58vppwas the sip bind address
06:28.03vppeven tho i'm using h323
06:28.05vpp?!?
06:28.19BoRiSyou *need* to set the bind address in h323
06:29.42dashspeaking of RTP! Why doesn't asterisk send RTP packets to the port it receives them from, after a SIP session has been established?
06:31.09iq_dash, good question
06:31.44vpphmm nope made a mistake that wasnt it
06:31.49vppi set the bind address already
06:31.51vppno go tho
06:33.18vpplocalhost*CLI>  -- remoteIpAddress: 10.11.11.187
06:33.18vpplocalhost*CLI>  -- remotePort: 49202
06:33.18vpplocalhost*CLI>  -- ExternalIpAddress: 127.0.0.1
06:33.35vppis that normal? i know 127.0.0.1 is local host but should it be using its real ip address
06:33.46vpp*shouldn't
06:45.36BoRiSreal external ip
06:46.09vppthe one of the interface
06:46.21vppa quick google seems to show i'm not the only one getting this
06:47.46vppcant find a solution tho :(
06:54.35*** join/#asterisk K9DI_BSD_WrkStn (~k9bsd@207-246-185-168.EastVillage.ResNet.wiu.edu)
06:58.43Xen^when i scan for udp ports then i got this http://pastebin.ca/10700
06:58.50Xen^can some one tell me is this okay ?
07:05.20vppKDXServer port?
07:05.59Xen^well * server
07:06.45vppoh lol i didnt read it properly
07:06.48vppi just saw the 10700
07:07.14Xen^hmm
07:08.55*** join/#asterisk Rick_Hunter (~rhunter@03-161.008.popsite.net)
07:17.01vpphmm whats newer the CVS or asterisk 1.0.7?
07:21.15tainted-cvs
07:21.24tainted-don't run it unless u are dumb
07:21.25vppthats what i thought...
07:21.38tainted-or are not using asterisk in production environment
07:21.42vppcvs checkout asterisk  <-- should give me the 'latest' development code
07:22.01tainted-bingo sherlock
07:22.17vppseems older.. maybe it just looks that way
07:22.35vpp1.0.7 is the latest stable right?
07:22.40tainted-yep
07:22.45vppk cool
07:28.40*** join/#asterisk coppice (~chatzilla@60.195.17.210.dyn.pacific.net.hk)
07:35.55*** join/#asterisk zeedo (~zeedo@www.bsrf.org.uk)
07:39.34vppok i'm gonna be brave and try asterisk 1.0.7 with Open H.323 version v1.17.1 and PWLib v1.9.0
07:40.16*** join/#asterisk TheEmperor (user@60.49.106.111)
07:40.45TheEmperoranyone good with setting up cronjobs here?
07:50.56QwellTheEmperor: man 5 cron
07:51.06*** part/#asterisk dash (~washort@adsl-159-172-100.bhm.bellsouth.net)
07:55.54Qwell~docs
07:55.55jbotDocumentation can be found at http://digium.com/index.php?menu=documentation or http://www.digium.com/handbook-draft.pdf or #asterisk-doc, or http://www.voip-info.org/wiki-Asterisk, or http://www.asteriskdocs.org
07:57.54*** join/#asterisk scardinal (~supreme@port816.ds1-suoe.adsl.cybercity.dk)
07:58.34firestrmanyone know why _alert_info= would be broken when using a tdm400?
07:59.23*** join/#asterisk felipex (~dsfdsf@host162-91.pool8533.interbusiness.it)
07:59.28felipexhi at all
07:59.35felipexwhat is cwain driver?
08:00.38firestrmalert_info was working fine with my sipura 3k, but now no worky with tdm400
08:02.30*** join/#asterisk cmk (~cmk_@p54A3B8F8.dip.t-dialin.net)
08:19.08firestrmanyone here know much about the whole SetVar(ALERT_INFO=Bellcore-r3) distinctive ring thing? it was working on a sipurs 3k but not working on a tdm400
08:55.13*** join/#asterisk langals (~icechat5@196.7.14.183)
08:55.50langalsHi there....wondering if someone could tell me how I would check the frame rate that a codec is using for a specific channel?
09:00.25*** join/#asterisk scardinal (~supreme@port816.ds1-suoe.adsl.cybercity.dk)
09:05.11*** join/#asterisk scardinal (~supreme@port816.ds1-suoe.adsl.cybercity.dk)
09:42.02*** join/#asterisk fantomax1 (~fanto@83.224.80.165)
09:42.04fantomax1hi all
09:42.15fantomax1i got this message on my * box
09:42.23fantomax1too many opena files
09:42.51fantomax1maximun retries exceeded , unable to allocare sip channel and unable to allocate RTP
09:43.33fantomax1Is my system full ... or can I set some parameter in the OS to avoid it ?
09:43.35fantomax1thansk
09:43.38fantomax1thanks
09:55.46*** join/#asterisk Gh0sty (~Ghosty@ip-81-11-220-129.dsl.scarlet.be)
10:02.47*** join/#asterisk anthm (~anthmct@CPE-69-76-83-52.wi.res.rr.com)
10:02.47*** mode/#asterisk [+o anthm] by ChanServ
10:07.39*** join/#asterisk jetdotnet (~jetdotnet@adsl-64-219-216-41.dsl.hstntx.swbell.net)
10:11.18*** join/#asterisk Synapse- (~pnats@c211-30-74-249.belrs2.nsw.optusnet.com.au)
10:17.06*** join/#asterisk Blackvel (~blackvel@dsl-213-023-034-149.arcor-ip.net)
10:20.01*** join/#asterisk Blackvel (~blackvel@dsl-213-023-034-149.arcor-ip.net)
10:24.54*** join/#asterisk OloBola (~casper_sp@adsl-69-110-121-26.dsl.pltn13.pacbell.net)
10:29.51OloBolahi
10:31.22OloBolatrying to encode a voicemail message into mp3 using 'lame' encoder
10:32.05OloBolait was outputting audio 10x or so faster than normal for some reason
10:33.08OloBolaI set the sampling frequency to 8000 for the input file, and 16000 for the outputted mp3 file.
10:33.33OloBolanow it plays about twice as fast as it should, which is better.
10:34.20illuvatorwhat's the command line
10:35.16OloBolawell I'm using vb6 with LameEncoder on my windows machine.
10:35.55OloBolaone of the properties allows me to set the frequencies for the input wav file and output file (mp3)
10:35.59*** join/#asterisk Druken (~druken@CPE00119539b9cc-CM000e5cde4ca2.cpe.net.cable.rogers.com)
10:36.49OloBolaI don't really now what the hell I'm doing, but it's a little closer than before
10:37.56OloBolaok, I just set the input frequency to 4000 and it works now
10:39.55illuvatorsoftware is evil
10:40.03illuvatorprogrammers are lazy
10:40.24Drukeneveryone is lazy
10:41.13illuvatoryeah but programmers especially
10:41.39coppicei'm not lazy, but I really can't be bothered arguing the point :-)
10:42.08Drukensmart ass
10:42.11Drukenhehe
10:43.39*** part/#asterisk m8rix|DND (Miranda@c80-217-74-84.cm-upc.chello.se)
10:44.00OloBolanot knowing what I doing but doing it seems to be a little gay
10:45.06Drukenuhmmm... yeah... what he said
10:47.50OloBolaI confuse my inputs from my outputs sometimes
10:48.20illuvatori'd be careful where you stick that carrot then
10:48.31Drukenhahaha
10:48.54Drukeni was thinking, must be a guy... because i always confuse those things on my wife too...
10:49.04OloBolathanks! Good thing it's not a fruit
10:54.43OloBola^
10:54.51Drukenhas anyone create a wakeup call web application?
10:55.06Drukensomething like a hotel would use..
10:55.54*** join/#asterisk usam (~usam@203.156.41.252)
10:58.10Blackvelnot me, you want that?
11:00.58*** join/#asterisk ckruetze (HydraIRC@cpc3-cmbg7-5-0-cust100.cmbg.cable.ntl.com)
11:01.47*** join/#asterisk ManxPower (~eric@adsl-35-236-60.msy.bellsouth.net)
11:05.01Drukeni was lookin for it... if someone has it.. cool, i'll take it and modify it.. otherwise i'll just create my own
11:05.11Drukendidn't want to redo something that's already done..
11:11.47*** join/#asterisk RoyK (~roy@143.80-202-166.nextgentel.com)
11:12.50facek_elou
11:16.33*** join/#asterisk zotz (~zotz@24.231.32.109)
11:19.29*** join/#asterisk christo (~chris@212.18.226.160)
11:19.34christohi all
11:20.15CoaxDlife sucks.  I'm up with a 10mo child. *growl*
11:20.28christoaaww not good
11:20.32CoaxDah well. i spose he's in a good mood. so, it isn't the worst thing in the world!
11:20.40christoyou must be in Asia somewhere?
11:20.52CoaxDmy 4 year old will be up in another hour and a half, too
11:20.55christoor .au
11:20.59CoaxDchristo; Um, USA
11:21.03christooh
11:21.06CoaxDcuz its 06:20am here.
11:21.28christoaah yeah - it's only 12.21 here.
11:21.35CoaxDah
11:22.11CoaxDnah, this one is up for the day. :/
11:22.17christolol
11:22.35CoaxDby the end of the day, i'm gonna be screwed up for sure. hah
11:22.39christojust stick the 4 yr old in charge ;)
11:22.42christohaha yeah
11:22.46christoyou'll be a gonner
11:22.48CoaxDsounds like the plan!!
11:22.51christo:)
11:23.00christocomedy
11:24.27CoaxDyeah, it'll turn out to be that way!
11:28.46*** join/#asterisk TheEmperor (user@60.49.106.111)
11:32.34*** join/#asterisk JunK-Y (~junky@modemcable174.107-81-70.mc.videotron.ca)
11:37.29christowhat would be the best way to store all this in a database so that my friends can view extensions thru a  browser?  http://pastebin.ca/10710  I'm running asterisk 1.0.5
11:37.57christoignore the obvivous typos on the extension numbers ;)
11:38.40DrukenCoaxD: is it your 10 mo old?
11:39.44christofor the time being it is, altho he may well have disowned it by lunchtime
11:40.23Drukenall i have to say is... welcome to parent hood :) should have kept it in yer pants :) hehe
11:41.04Drukenchristo, i'd use FOP for that
11:41.10DrukenFOP == Flash operator panel
11:41.39Drukengives a nice graphical view of the extensions,
11:46.45Drukeni'm assuming your looking for something similar? or am i way off in left field?
11:51.45CoaxDDruken: Nahhhh... not my kid
11:52.02tzafrirchristo, store extentions in a database only to allow browsing in a browser?
11:52.10tzafrirbah...
11:52.36CoaxDDruken: But, i *do* have a 4 year old, so, technically, you're still correct. (he's still asleep in his bed! *lol*)
11:53.05DrukenCoaxD: ahh, well... that's diffrent then... tell mommy to ger her ass out of bed and tend to her yonge :)
11:53.34CoaxDDruken: hahahah. mom's out of commission for a while.  She's off galavanting. :)  However, we're watching the kid!
11:54.00Drukeni had a girlfriend once who had an infant, kid could cry right next to her... she wouldn't even flinch
11:54.14DrukenCoaxD: sounds like fun :)
11:54.16CoaxDDruken: Yeah, thats the best kind of mom.  Raises independant childre
11:54.17CoaxDn
11:54.30CoaxDFrom day 1, they have to fend for themselves at times
11:54.45Drukeni can see at times... but not all the time..
11:54.49Druken:)
11:54.53*** join/#asterisk danalien (~danalien@danalien.user)
11:54.57Drukeni'm a sucker for kids personally
11:54.59CoaxDDruken: Smart decision for you to break up with her, then!
11:55.03tzafrirchristo, generally all it takes is a little script
11:56.02tzafrirHowever even when you do store extensions in a database you get basically the equivalent of asterisk's config files.
11:56.29tzafrirThere's still nothing well defined in extensions.conf that you can call "an extension"
11:56.48CoaxDtzafrir: Um, sure there is
11:56.55Drukeni personally belive extension is a bad word to use in voip
11:57.03tzafrirCoaxD, what is it, then?
11:57.09CoaxDtzafrir: exten => 1,1,Answer()
11:57.17CoaxDtzafrir: Extension 1, step 1!
11:57.18Drukenmost people think of extensions as they are to a normal PBX
11:57.33tzafrirCoaxD, it is highly dependent on your dialplan.
11:57.44CoaxDoh, sure. an extension in a normal PBX is directly associated with a handset
11:57.51CoaxDin asterisk, it may not be
11:57.56Drukenexactly
11:58.31Drukeni look at the dialplan in two aspects, incoming, and outgoing...
11:58.42Drukengenerally all my outgoing calls, follow the same path
11:58.52Drukenmy incoming calls, they can all be diffrent
11:59.14CoaxDDruken: For your setup, sure
11:59.23CoaxDDruken: I have a PBX that takes at least 6 known outgoing paths
11:59.30CoaxDDruken: (Depending upon the handset that dials.)
11:59.48Drukenoh..
11:59.53CoaxDDruken: incoming is all different too
12:00.18Drukeni throw all my outgoing calls in the outgoing context, and depending on what number they are calling, depends on the route it takes
12:00.31tzafrirAnd there is basically nothing you can easily point at in the dialplan that is a "phone" or a "trunk".
12:00.41Drukennewp
12:01.07tzafrirNot to mention that to be useful, each phone/trunk has to be defined outside of the dialplan
12:02.01*** join/#asterisk ckruetze_ (HydraIRC@cpc3-cmbg7-5-0-cust100.cmbg.cable.ntl.com)
12:02.09Drukenhow bout we all agree, that asterisk's configs are a bloody nightmare at times?
12:02.42tzafrirI wonder what it would take to add optional M4 support to asterisk's config files (just like in fvwm)
12:02.52tzafriror any better idea?
12:03.54Drukenhehe i remember someone had the idea of a tagged config..
12:04.23tzafrirUntil that happens, we'll just have to add all that "wizdom" to smart interfaces that will build consistent configuration to Asterisk.
12:05.23Drukeni think alot of the problem is because of the dynamics of asterisk, it's hard to write out everything in a way for a standard editor
12:05.25tzafrirhmm, fvwm-like config files will not work: fvwm reads all of them configs in one shot. asterisk reads each one separately.
12:06.29tzafrirDruken, actually, I have no problem writing with a standard editor (vim is great). But data is duplicated, and this means that I have to do the same change in several places.
12:07.55Drukenonly way to reduce duplicate data, is to combine everything into a single config file, under subheadings for the various sections
12:08.07Drukenthen you can use something like fvwm configs
12:08.20tzafrirDruken, currently different modules read different config files
12:08.34Drukenexactly
12:08.42Drukenso it's almost impossible
12:09.25tzafrirDruken, however they all use the same parser to parse the configuration files.
12:09.37tzafrirYou can extend the parser.
12:10.07Drukenwell, as i am not a programmer, i cannot do anything :)
12:10.36CoaxDDruken: Except bitch about asterisk's config subsystem, apparently :)
12:10.36tzafrirSome food for thought. The current parser has a special case for lines that begin with '#'. Those are parsed by it.
12:10.43Drukenbut there are enough programmers here to get virtually any task done, because you guys are all miracle workers :)
12:11.07*** join/#asterisk jonas (jonas@jonas.probe-networks.host.freenode)
12:11.22tzafrirCurrently the only control word is '#include' But maybe it is possible to implement #define without actually breaking everything ?
12:11.24CoaxDasterisk is way more powerful becasue it does NOT operate exactly like every other PBX in the world
12:12.21DrukenCoaxD: who's bitching? i just said that "sometimes" it's a nightmare
12:12.30CoaxDhehe ok
12:12.48CoaxDDruken: (Remember, 7:12am, have had 4 hours of sleep, and the current "children activated" count is now *2*.)
12:13.06CoaxDDruken: Got a 6 year old up too. :)  (She's sitting quietly on the couch watching PBS, tho!)
12:13.09Drukeni am able to navagate it ok... but i do agree with tzafrir, that alot of data is duplicate
12:13.18tzafrir(Though I bet I'm not the first one who had this "clever" idea, and implement it does break things all over the place)
12:13.46DrukenCoaxD: 12 and 10 here, 3yr old is at grand parents, 8:15 here
12:13.50Drukenbeen up since 6
12:14.35Drukenkids were watching movie... but have since come to bug me :)
12:14.37CoaxDDruken: Haha
12:14.56CoaxDDruken: at 12 and 10, hell, you could sleep in!
12:15.23Drukennot when the wife wakes me up when she goes to work
12:15.30CoaxDheh
12:15.38CoaxDwell, with a 3 year old, granted, she needs to wake you :)
12:16.13Drukencaught the 12 yr old up at 1am last night sneaking out to the computer... lil bastard
12:16.14Druken:)
12:16.26CoaxDkick his ass!@
12:16.43Drukeni would if they were my kids :)
12:17.10CoaxDwooo
12:17.14Drukenbut no.. i'd rather torture them by being on the computer myself, and not allowing them to use the other ones
12:17.18CoaxDmr. crappy pants needs a diaper change. brb
12:17.19*** part/#asterisk JunK-Y (~junky@modemcable174.107-81-70.mc.videotron.ca)
12:21.18CoaxDmr. crappy pants == mr. clean pants
12:22.42Druken:)
12:23.14CoaxDasterisk extension logic is *way* easier than children's logic
12:23.29Drukenhmm.... who would have though i could be busy enough to actually miss calls from asterisk
12:23.34CoaxDchild's logic: "Gee, I'm in a new diaper.  I'll crap in it just so he has to needlessly use a new one!"
12:24.05CoaxDasterisk logic: "What's a diaper?"
12:24.09Drukenhehe i always waited like 5 mins once i smelt it.. just to make sure they are done :)
12:24.18CoaxDhehe
12:24.38CoaxDthere's one kid here who will crap her pants, get changed, and then about 45min later (on the dot, actually) crap again, with a far bigger load
12:24.42Druken5 mins won't kill them
12:24.44Druken:)
12:25.03Drukenthat's odd...
12:25.10CoaxDDruken: Yeah, tell me about it
12:25.13Drukenthat's WAY too regular
12:25.28CoaxDDruken: Yeah, scarey, aint it? *g*
12:25.55Drukencut down the chocolate :) start givin her oatmeal :)
12:26.32CoaxDHahahahaha
12:26.43CoaxDaint my kid, sir. And she eats good food.
12:26.53CoaxD(Whacky child anyway, tho.  She's a wierdo.)
12:27.21Drukenwhat kid isn't a weirdo?
12:27.30CoaxDthis one is ESPECIALLY a wierdo
12:28.28Drukenthe 8yr old here... if we goto mcdonalds or something... he'll ask for a burger like a bigmac or something, without everything, cept ketchup, becaue he doesn't like onions, pickels, basically anything and everything
12:28.39Drukenthis kid doesn't even like chocolate
12:28.55CoaxDwhy not just get a quarter pounder w/ cheese? :)
12:29.06CoaxD(I hate all the stuff on a big mac, too)
12:29.06Drukenhehe
12:29.26*** join/#asterisk jwitte (~jwitte_su@firefly.alpha-lab.net)
12:29.30Drukeneven with that one, he'd want it without the onions, and pickels, etc
12:29.56Drukenjust ketchup.. i mean, he ate 2 waffels this morning, without anything on them
12:30.27CoaxDbahahahaha
12:31.03Drukenhillarious too, took a knife and fork out.. but never touched them... just picked them up and ate them
12:32.22CoaxDhaha
12:32.32CoaxDyour chromosomes in that one?
12:32.42Drukennewp
12:32.45CoaxDhehe
12:32.48Drukenmines the 3yr old
12:32.53CoaxDOOOH!
12:32.55CoaxDSweet!
12:33.13CoaxDhaving sex is fun. And then the baby pops out.
12:33.17Drukenactually... we don't have a child together
12:33.34Drukennah.. she's been fixed long before we got together
12:33.40CoaxDoh! So, each separate relationship children
12:33.50Drukenyep
12:33.55CoaxDschweet
12:34.21Drukenthere's 12, 10, 6, 5, and 3
12:34.21CoaxDso, you got your sunday morning w/ the kiddo! (Except kiddo is with someone else on your sunday morn! hah.)
12:34.29CoaxD*gah*
12:34.40CoaxDyou did all *that* for a GIRL???
12:34.44Drukengrand parents get mommy's alternating weekends presently
12:35.01CoaxDah!
12:35.08CoaxD'course
12:35.17Drukenwell, technically, only the 3 lives with us for now
12:35.19CoaxDmy gf has 2 of her own, i have one, and gf's roomate has one
12:36.17Drukennothing wrong with that
12:36.49CoaxDand we ahve every single one at this juncture *g*
12:36.55*** part/#asterisk langals (~icechat5@196.7.14.183)
12:37.04Drukenyeah... we are lookin into gettin a bigger house to fit them all.. hehehe
12:37.13Drukenit's a tight fit when they are all here
12:37.32Drukenthank christ for pullout sofa's
12:37.58*** join/#asterisk clinthome (~clinthome@va-chrvlle-cad1-bdgrp5-8d-209.chvlva.adelphia.net)
12:38.34CoaxDlol
12:40.16Drukeni'd be set if a could find myself a nice.... country setting, with highspeed connection, with a house with like 6 bedrooms
12:41.34CoaxDhahaha
12:41.54CoaxDso let me get this straight.. you want to rent...the white house?
12:42.03Drukenrent? pfft
12:42.12CoaxDoh
12:42.16Drukeni want to buy my friend
12:42.17CoaxDwell, if you want to FINANCE the white house...
12:42.25*** join/#asterisk cc (~cc@byte.fedora)
12:42.29CoaxDI'm sure you could get bush to cut you a deal on i
12:42.42CoaxDt
12:42.53Drukenwell, since i'm canadian, i don't think the whitehouse would be appropiate
12:43.09CoaxDhmmm i see
12:43.11CoaxDyes, that would do it
12:43.58Drukeni tell ya tho... if i ever won the lottery... hehehe
12:44.02*** join/#asterisk gambolputty (~gambolput@cblmdm65-221-51-80.buckeye-express.com)
12:44.23Drukeni'd buy myself a nice house out in the country, and have a few pairs of fiber run into it.. and call it a day :)
12:45.18Drukeni'm sure once the fiber was run, i'd be broke again
12:45.27CoaxDoh of course
12:45.36CoaxDwhere does the fiber go? :)
12:45.51Drukenwould depend on the carrier
12:46.14Drukengenerally it'd go into the closest central office
12:46.40*** join/#asterisk newbien (~e@147.241.33.65.cfl.res.rr.com)
12:47.29newbien<PROTECTED>
12:58.24*** join/#asterisk Zeeek (~Zeeek@Zeeek.sustaining.supporter.pdpc)
13:04.44newbien<PROTECTED>
13:04.55heison~seen JerJer
13:05.12jbotjerjer <~JerJer@DSL-226.206-rt-bras.che.centurytel.net> was last seen on IRC in channel #asterisk, 3d 7h 41m 2s ago, saying: 'try ulaw or gsm'.
13:19.49*** join/#asterisk meppl (~mephisto@pD9E689D1.dip.t-dialin.net)
13:20.46newbienamportal is a setup gui for asterisk?
13:22.57mepplguten morgen
13:33.55*** join/#asterisk cmk (~cmk_@p54A3B8F8.dip.t-dialin.net)
13:36.39newbienCannot find extension context 'from-fwd'
13:42.18*** join/#asterisk telephoneman (~chatzilla@67-41-211-223.brbn.qwest.net)
13:45.47*** join/#asterisk [cc]smart (~smart@gw.ptr-62-65-149-158.customer.ch.netstream.com)
13:47.02[cc]smarti'm trying to use zapras. i have compiled and installed it and set up an entry in the dialplan. in syslog i get: Plugin zaptel.so loaded  ..... Unable to put device 'stdin' into HDLC mode.
13:47.09[cc]smarti assume i need to add some configuration
13:47.13[cc]smartsbdy has a hint ?
13:47.45[cc]smartoops, forgot... this describes the reaction of pppd
13:48.22uzdhi.
13:49.02uzdanyone have new voicemail notification on their phones? like asterisk@home does.. to make your voicemail light blink on your handsets
13:49.10*** join/#asterisk langals (~icechat5@196.7.14.183)
13:52.29illuvatoruzd: are we talking about analog phones?
13:54.06*** join/#asterisk _SMP_ (~SMP@pandora.burned.net)
13:55.15newbienhow can i set up kphone and fwd as the proxy in asterisk 1.0? the wiki examples give errors
13:55.44*** join/#asterisk masonc (~lists@206.48.59.5)
13:57.14masoncCan anyone help installing a t1 => channel bank
13:59.23illuvatorsure
13:59.30masoncthanks
13:59.31illuvatorwhat model of channel bank?
13:59.37masoncI have a sangoma A101
13:59.41masoncAdtran 600
13:59.57illuvatorhaha, well, interesting
14:00.00masoncI took everything out except one 4 channel fxs card
14:00.02illuvatortwo devices i've never used :)
14:00.18illuvatorwhat channel driver does the sangoma use in asterisk?
14:00.25masoncwanrouter
14:01.07masoncthe TDM Voice span - should it be set to 1?
14:01.57illuvatorhmm
14:03.00masoncTHis is my problem
14:03.00illuvatorok give me a moment here
14:03.03masonc[root@altpbx wanpipe]# wanrouter start
14:03.03masoncStarting WAN Router...
14:03.03masoncStarting up device: wanpipe1
14:03.03masonc<PROTECTED>
14:03.03masonc<PROTECTED>
14:03.04masonc<PROTECTED>
14:03.06masoncConfiguring interfaces: w1g1
14:03.08masoncdone.
14:03.45illuvatorok, so, I don't think I'll be able to help with this unfortunately
14:03.51illuvatori'm only used to use zapata devices
14:04.04masoncok, thanks
14:04.22masoncI think I will have to call Sangoma
14:05.16*** join/#asterisk Flusher (flusher@filer.euroserv.com)
14:05.39uzdyou people actually use asterisk as your commercial pbx?
14:05.41illuvatorhave you seen this:
14:05.45illuvatorhttp://www.sangoma.com/linux/asterisk-readme.htm
14:05.46uzdcommercial/production
14:05.53illuvatoryes
14:06.00uzdinterestng
14:06.05uzdhow many users?
14:06.20illuvatorI have a system here in India with 25 seats
14:06.24illuvatorcall center
14:06.34uzdNice.
14:06.37illuvatorand one in the use for 45 seats which is just a normal office
14:06.53illuvatorthen I also use it for backhauling lage ammounts lf calls
14:07.26Flushernice
14:07.47FlusherI've set up a asterisk @ work, it's working very well
14:08.09Flusherhowever it was difficult to understand the conf files
14:08.33illuvatoryeah, the biggest system we have is a 4-way opteron which has 12 T1's doing IAX2/gsm/echo cancellation
14:08.35Flusherthat's the main (only one maybe) reproach I could do to asterisk
14:08.52Flushernice pet
14:09.17illuvatorasterisk is very different than any other phone siwtch
14:09.36illuvatorand since it is a phone switch the configuration is much different than any standard unix thing
14:09.49Flusheri ve been a network admin, i not familiar with telco (classical pbx, etc)
14:10.03Flusheri thought it would be easier to set up
14:10.05illuvatorwell, asterisk is so much better and easier to configure than any of that horse shit
14:10.43Flusheri had to find several tips to make it works with my voip (SIP) provider and some softphones such as x-lite
14:10.51illuvatoryeah
14:10.54masoncasterisk us not hard to configure, jsut start with a very basic system and leaves lots of time for reading
14:10.54illuvatorSIP is really hard
14:11.09Flushervoip-info is a nice resource but i had to find the infos for a while
14:11.13illuvatorthe problem is that SIP tends to be vendor specific
14:11.20Flusheryes right
14:11.33illuvatorfor example, try getting cisco SIP stations to work with an avaya VOIP switch
14:11.35illuvatorit won't happen
14:11.57masoncI jsut setup a polycom 600 on asterisk
14:12.00masoncwhat a great phone
14:12.12Flusherand about the price ?
14:12.40masoncof the phone?
14:12.44Flusheryes
14:12.48masoncwhere are you
14:12.57Flusheri know the grandstream phones which are quite cheap
14:13.00Flusheri m in france, paris
14:13.08mgthgrandstream phones suck
14:13.10masoncin the US, they are under $300
14:13.12Flusherreally ?
14:13.18Flusherwhat's the problem with these phones ?
14:13.20masoncexpensive
14:13.22mgthyes they are barbertones
14:13.24masoncbut awesome
14:13.27mgthbarbietones
14:13.32Flusherha yes, too expensive for me
14:13.35*** join/#asterisk pussfeller (~todd@t1-rtc-woodlawn.rtcol.com)
14:13.41masoncwhat does ZT_SPANCONFIG failed on span 1: Invalid argument (22) mean?
14:14.00Flusheri m starting an opensource software based company here in france, so i have to take care on expenses ...
14:14.00*** join/#asterisk grolloj (~grolloj@dsl254-116-106.nyc1.dsl.speakeasy.net)
14:14.13Flusherand i thought budgetones from grandstream would suffire
14:14.23masoncthen buy sipuras
14:14.29masoncgreat phone
14:14.35Flusherok i ll find info about them
14:14.46masoncjust got bought by cisco
14:14.53Flushersipura is the company that has just been bought back isnt it ?
14:14.53masoncabout $80 each
14:15.03Flusherby cisco yes
14:15.09Flusherok this sounds nice
14:15.26Flushereven if it will be probably more expensive in paris
14:16.33FlusherSipura SPA-841
14:16.50newbienwhere would i search to find how to set up kphone and fwd for asterisk; wiki examples give errors
14:17.31Flusherfor fwd, it's well described on voip-info.org
14:18.04Flusherand also for kphone : http://www.voip-info.org/wiki-Asterisk+phone+Kphone
14:18.37Flusherfor fwd it's http://www.voip-info.org/wiki-Asterisk+How+to+connect+to+FWD
14:18.38newbienFlusher: yea, both wiki files for kphone and fwd give errors for asterisk 1.0
14:18.56Flusherand there is another page for NAT
14:18.58Flusherk
14:19.21Flusherbut the doc doesnt suffire ?
14:19.28Flusherit should be helpful
14:19.38Flusherhttp://www.voip-info.org/wiki-Asterisk+FWD+NAT+Config+Example
14:19.53Flusheryou should read this
14:20.20Flusherif you want to use fwd behind NAT
14:21.37newbienFlusher: thanks, stand alone linux box, no nat
14:21.47Flusherok
14:22.54newbienNOTICE[98310]: Cannot find extension context 'from-fwd'
14:23.04newbienUnable to get our IP address, Skinny disabled
14:23.15newbienRead error on sound device: Resource temporarily unavailable
14:24.02newbienall those errors are from many editings of the wiki examples for kphone and fwd setup
14:25.24Flusherunfortunately i havent try kphone yet, i can't help you
14:25.39Flushermoreover i m a newbie with asterisk ...
14:25.50*** part/#asterisk langals (~icechat5@196.7.14.183)
14:26.12Flusheri m sure that someone of the 266 users here will help you :p
14:27.05newbienFlusher: thanks for the effort; this newbie will ask repeatedly here until i get some hints ;)
14:29.39Flusher:)
14:32.30*** join/#asterisk bkw_ (~bkw_@bkw.developer.and.friend.of.asterisk)
14:32.30*** mode/#asterisk [+o bkw_] by ChanServ
14:34.11newbienin standard sip.conf  context=from-fwd gives errors
14:38.33*** join/#asterisk Wi_Fi (~OUT@c-24-127-12-85.hsd1.ca.comcast.net)
14:39.46*** join/#asterisk jtodd (~jtodd@blob.fox-den.com) [NETSPLIT VICTIM]
14:39.46*** join/#asterisk flynux (zo56z8d@cl-8.bru-01.be.sixxs.net) [NETSPLIT VICTIM]
14:39.46*** join/#asterisk psycodad (~obiwan@2001:4060:4419:b1:0:0:0:2) [NETSPLIT VICTIM]
14:39.47*** join/#asterisk kore (kore@mindwipe.org) [NETSPLIT VICTIM]
14:39.47*** join/#asterisk gein (~gein@213.134.110.241)
14:39.47*** join/#asterisk Brumle (~brumle@brumle.com) [NETSPLIT VICTIM]
14:39.47*** join/#asterisk KryoStoffer (~kri@helium.kri.dk) [NETSPLIT VICTIM]
14:48.36newbienWARNING[16384]: Unable to get our IP address, Skinny disabled; wiki search gives no answers
14:49.09Drukenthat is just a warning, won't affect operation
14:49.26DrukenNOTICE[98310]: Cannot find extension context 'from-fwd'
14:49.36newbienDruken: good, then everything should be operational and working?
14:49.41Drukenmeans just what it says, you don't have a [from-fwd] contect
14:49.44Drukener context
14:50.01Drukenyou must READ what the warnings and errors tell you
14:50.06newbienDruken: thanks, just got that fixed 2 min ago in extensions.conf ;)
14:50.09Drukengenerally they are self explanitort
14:50.16Druken-t+y
14:50.48newbienDruken: yea, total newb at asterisk but learning slowly ;/
14:51.10Drukenvoip-info.org is your best tool, become very friendly with it :)
14:51.23tzafrirnewbien, do you need skinny?
14:51.28newbienDruken: k, thanks for the info and the tip
14:51.45tzafrir(this is mainly for cisco phones that can't talk sip)
14:52.00newbientzafrir: being a asterisk newb i have no idea if i need skinny.conf or not
14:52.11tzafrirhmm, ok, already answered
14:53.01newbientzafrir: working with make samples in /etc/asterisk and have not deleted any files so far
14:53.29K9DI_BSD_WrkStnhello
14:53.48mgthnewbien: What are you trying to do?
14:54.39newbienwhat does this mean: WARNING[163850]: Read error on sound device: Resource temporarily unavailable ?
14:55.10newbienmgth: get kphone and fwd setup for asterisk on a stand alone linux box, no nat
14:55.29mgthyou don't need skinny
14:55.32newbienis alsa the default sound device? or is it OSS?
14:56.35newbienmgth: yea, only installed asterisk last night, didnt know you could delete unneeded files in /etc/asterisk cause i still dont know which files i need ;)
14:56.43K9DI_BSD_WrkStnwhat is the latest iteration of asterisk?
14:56.50mgthread the topic
14:57.31newbiendo i have a borked asterisk install if sound is OSS?
14:57.46K9DI_BSD_WrkStntnx mgth
14:57.59mgthyou don't need console sound
14:59.05newbienmgth: dont need console sound with kphone?
14:59.18mgthare you running kphone on the asterisk box?
14:59.39newbienmgth: trying to, not successful yet
15:00.09newbienno wait, on a linux box with asterisk installed, not an asterisk box
15:00.14mgthyou will need to look in modules.conf and unload the oss or alsa drivers for asterisk that way kphone can use it
15:01.04newbienmgth: do you just start asterisk with asterisk or with asterisk -vvvc to run kphone and fwd?
15:01.35mgthyou can start asterisk either way you want to, one gives you access to the console and verbose debug information, the other just starts asterisk
15:01.43mgthnewbien: go do some reading at voip-info.org
15:02.27newbienmgth: k, thanks for the info
15:13.48*** join/#asterisk Legend (~legend@24.244.142.133)
15:16.55*** join/#asterisk cmk (~cmk_@p54A3B8F8.dip.t-dialin.net)
15:17.47K9DI_BSD_WrkStnmgth, are there many asterisk users that are running it under one of the bsd's?
15:18.00K9DI_BSD_WrkStnI'm just curious.
15:19.48mozratHey guys - My asterisk server has all of a sudden stopped talking to me :( When i try and Playback() or Background() a gsm file, or even go to voicemail it doesn't say anything back. Asterisk version 1.0.7 on Debian Sarge
15:20.08*** join/#asterisk A-Tuin (~a-tuin@steves.ip.v4.me.uk)
15:21.49*** part/#asterisk cjk (~cjk@80.92.75.4)
15:25.17*** join/#asterisk kore (kore@mindwipe.org) [NETSPLIT VICTIM]
15:25.17*** join/#asterisk gein (~gein@213.134.110.241)
15:25.36newbien<PROTECTED>
15:33.41*** join/#asterisk shaonss (~shaon@61.68.17.217)
15:34.27shaonssanybody from Australia?
15:35.29shaonsscan asterisk hot STUN
15:36.30*** join/#asterisk Rick_Hunter (~rhunter@08-020.008.popsite.net)
15:40.42jeffikanybody familiar wiht *@home?
15:44.59kFuQ<PROTECTED>
15:45.00kFuQhttp://www.pro-g.co.uk/news/nid/676/
15:45.02kFuQomfg
15:47.45masoncthat's 50 times what my whole country has
15:48.45kFuQinsane.. that's what it is..
15:48.49kFuQ<--- jealous
15:48.53jeffikanybody familiar wiht *@home?
15:49.20masoncask the question
15:51.02jeffikok, signed up with a new provider who has never configed on 8@home.  he gave me a set up exten => _416202XXXX,1,Dial(IAX2/jeff:xxxxxx/38.112.88.102/${EXTEN}) the first xxxx is what he actualy gave me, the second set is my secret
15:51.34jeffiki have done a little work directly in .conf files but not enough to know where to put the string
15:51.53jeffikI have tried a lot of config combos but none work
15:51.57kFuQhas to be an entry in extensions.conf and iax.conf
15:52.17kFuQexten => _416202XXXX,1,Dial(IAX2/jeff:xxxxxx/38.112.88.102/${EXTEN})  <-- extensions.conf
15:53.00jeffikand where in extions.conf to i put it?
15:53.35jeffikand do i put it in both exactly as he gave it to me?
15:53.36kFuQprobably in an incoming context..
15:53.42jeffikok
15:53.59jeffikkFuQ: thaks, i a little lost
15:54.12kFuQtook me a couple months to figure mine out lol
15:54.21kFuQbut i did all mine by hand..
15:54.34jeffikkFuQ: You running * or @home?
15:54.45kFuQ*
15:55.30masoncanyone got the polycom distribution files?
15:55.34jeffikkFuQ: I have been using @hoem for 3 months and I really like it, i want to learn * when i have the time.
15:56.14jeffikkFuQ: so i put the string in extensions and iax.conf?
15:56.29kFuQno.. there should be a different line in iax.conf
15:57.18jeffikkFuQ: different?  how so?
15:57.34kFuQsomething similar to this..
15:57.36kFuQ[provider]
15:57.36kFuQtype=peer
15:57.36kFuQhost=host.of.ur.provider
15:57.36kFuQsecret=passwd
15:58.50jeffikok thanks, I'm using sixtel so far it's ok, today no calls to Moscow or Kiev so I would like to make the new provider work
16:01.46*** join/#asterisk iq|laptop (~iq@65-103-167-17.omah.qwest.net)
16:03.18fileeeeeeeeeeeeep
16:03.47iq|laptopmorning
16:04.25*** join/#asterisk oej (~oej@apollo.webway.se)
16:04.37fileoejjjjjjjj
16:04.49oejfile: FIIIIIle
16:04.58fileoej: how are you?
16:05.10oejfile: Fine. And you:
16:05.15fileoej: great
16:05.17oej?
16:05.56filemy ISP is attempting to disconnect me from the net however
16:06.35oejfile: Why?
16:06.56filedunno, they do it a lot
16:08.54ManxPower~docs
16:08.55jbotDocumentation can be found at http://digium.com/index.php?menu=documentation or http://www.digium.com/handbook-draft.pdf or #asterisk-doc, or http://www.voip-info.org/wiki-Asterisk, or http://www.asteriskdocs.org
16:17.21*** join/#asterisk shaonss (~shaon@61.68.17.217)
16:20.07*** part/#asterisk [cc]smart (~smart@gw.ptr-62-65-149-158.customer.ch.netstream.com)
16:27.23*** join/#asterisk icexx (~jj@213.170.75.191)
16:27.25icexxy0 pplz
16:27.34*** join/#asterisk Wi_Fi (~OUT@c-24-127-12-85.hsd1.ca.comcast.net)
16:27.49icexxhave a question, how does asterisk look for peers/users when you get an incoming SIP call from somewhere?
16:28.26tzangerasterisk terminates calls from users
16:28.41icexx;)
16:28.46tzangerasterisk directs calls to peers
16:28.51icexxok, i register with my provider
16:29.03icexxi get an incoming sip call to my DID with provider
16:29.25tzangeryou are a user to them
16:29.29icexxyup
16:29.44tzangerer sorry you are a peer to them
16:29.52tzangerthey are Dial()ing you
16:29.55icexxso in sip.conf i setup a type=user section for them
16:29.57tzangerthey are a user to you
16:30.17icexxhow does asterisk recognize this section?
16:30.23tzangerso yes, to accept the call you have a [something] entry for them with type=peer
16:30.33icexxpeer??
16:30.41tzangerand context=blah where in extensions.conf [blah] is where the call will end up
16:30.50tzangerwtf
16:30.54tzangerI am still digesting breakfast
16:31.00tzangerI apologize, brain is not fully engaged yet
16:31.14fileit really depends how they send the call to you
16:31.21fileif they do authentication, then it's a user
16:31.22tzanger[provider] type=user, iwth context=provider-incoming
16:31.31fileif you have to match via IP address, then it's a peer
16:31.42icexxhere is what i am doing, sec
16:31.57tzangerfile: ??  I can do either with a user
16:32.06tzangerincoming calls get searched against a type=user
16:32.10tzangeroutgoing calls look for a type=friend
16:32.19filetzanger: incoming calls also get searched against a peer
16:32.24tzangerunless I'm serioulsy on crack
16:32.30tzangerfile: they do?
16:32.32fileyes
16:32.43tzangerI've always had to have type=user to have an incomign call accepted (or =friend, but that's evil)
16:32.51file[blah]
16:32.52filetype=peer
16:32.52tzangerbecause context=blah is not valid for a peer
16:32.54filehost=myotherbox.com
16:32.56filecontext=blah
16:32.58fileinsecure=very
16:33.16tzangermind you this is sip too, I'm pretty sure the logic is the same for iax2 and sip but that is an assumption
16:33.18filewill match based on the IP address that myotherbox.com resolves to, so any INVITE coming from that IP will be thrown into the blah context
16:33.20*** join/#asterisk icexxik (~jj@213.170.75.191)
16:33.22icexxikoops
16:33.25icexxikgot disc
16:33.29filetzanger: bad assumption
16:33.34tzangerfile: :-)
16:33.38icexxik[iconn]
16:33.38icexxiktype=user
16:33.38icexxikcontext=iconnect
16:33.38icexxikhost=sipauth.deltathree.com
16:33.38icexxikusername=whatever
16:33.39icexxikdtmf=inband
16:33.41icexxikdisallow=all
16:33.41tzangerI just made an ass of you and me
16:33.43icexxikallow=gsm
16:33.45icexxikallow=alaw
16:33.47icexxikallow=ulaw
16:33.49icexxikallow=g726
16:33.58tzangerSTOP PASITNG
16:34.01tzangerer PASTING
16:34.04tzangerdammit
16:34.13icexxikand you know what * says when i get incoming call ;) says peer or user not found
16:34.17icexxik;)
16:34.32file:)
16:34.37icexxikso, that's my question, how does it look for the user ? :)
16:34.51fileit challenges the other side for user credentials
16:34.54filea username and password.
16:35.10filewhich very rarely do providers allow, because their system isn't setup/isn't capable of doing it
16:35.21fileso with a peer entry and insecure=very, you can match based on the IP address that the calls are coming from
16:35.27filethat's what you have to do for broadvoice and other providers
16:36.02icexxikif i set it to peer, it finds that record, and tries to forward the inbound call there for some reason
16:36.25fileset it to a type peer
16:36.28fileand add insecure=very
16:36.31filedo a sip reload, and see if it works
16:36.32icexxikok, lemme try
16:40.23icexxikit worked ;)
16:40.29icexxikxplain why! :)
16:41.18fileI did already
16:41.22filetwice, I think
16:41.29icexxik;)
16:49.32*** part/#asterisk icexxik (~jj@213.170.75.191)
16:55.11*** join/#asterisk viLeR (1000@ip-47-252.telesat.com.co)
16:56.45*** join/#asterisk CoolAcid (~jk@216.99.98.39)
16:59.41*** part/#asterisk jeffik (jefik@69.158.2.124)
17:02.50*** join/#asterisk MikeJ[Laptop] (~jayden@pcp02795302pcs.roylok01.mi.comcast.net)
17:05.46K9DI_BSD_WrkStnHi file
17:05.56filehello
17:07.52K9DI_BSD_WrkStnfile, check private screen please. tnx
17:13.25*** join/#asterisk iq (~iq@65-103-167-17.omah.qwest.net)
17:23.44*** join/#asterisk ricko73 (~dhartman@c24.183.21.87.fdl.wi.charter.com)
17:26.48*** join/#asterisk sivana (~sivana@mixdown.ca)
17:26.57*** part/#asterisk sivana (~sivana@mixdown.ca)
17:27.08*** join/#asterisk sivana (~sivana@mixdown.ca)
17:27.39Drukensivana: just the man i was lookin for
17:29.38sivanalol
17:29.46sivanahow are you?
17:29.54Drukengood, yourself?
17:30.02sivananot bad, can't complain
17:30.08Drukenexcelent
17:30.13sivanadoesn't do any good anyways, nobody listens :)
17:30.21Drukentoo true
17:32.10*** join/#asterisk A-Tuin (~a-tuin@steves.ip.v4.me.uk)
17:33.26fileyou're potatoes
17:33.28fileevery one of you
17:33.38QwellYou're a cucumber
17:34.07fileI don't like cucumbers :(
17:34.14QwellThats why you are one.
17:34.22file:(
17:34.28fileyou make me sad
17:34.44MikeJ[Laptop]vegtables?
17:35.37Drukenmoo...
17:36.05filemeep...
17:36.18Qwellquack...
17:36.19Qwell?
17:36.49Qwelleww
17:36.55QwellYou don't know where I've been...
17:36.58ricko73I didn't know this was the salad channel
17:37.13Qwellricko73: You often make cucumber and potato salads?
17:37.33ricko73I don't but some people do.
17:38.38ricko73Is anyone on here who uses Asterisk with analog phone lines?
17:39.58Drukenof course
17:40.25Qwellmeh, Vonage sucks
17:40.51drumkillahey guys, how do I be the next Vonage?
17:40.53Drukenyour only figuring this out now?
17:41.15Drukendrumkilla: are you an idiot with millions of dollars?
17:41.21Qwelldrumkilla: Have shitty customer service, and do stupid things
17:41.23drumkillaYES
17:41.47drumkillapeople ask that question all the time ... it's ridiculous  :)
17:41.58*** join/#asterisk iq[laptop] (~iq@65-103-167-17.omah.qwest.net)
17:42.01iq[laptop]<PROTECTED>
17:43.30*** join/#asterisk riksta (rick@212.85.228.176)
17:44.55shaonsswhat value asterisk return when other party hangup?
17:46.33Vco"Disconnected: Other people think you are boring"
17:46.41*** join/#asterisk dimas (~ds@vbc.elcom.ru)
17:46.53drumkillashaonss: the dial application would return 0 in that case
17:46.57shaonsshow can i "goto" from some other options if the user hangup?
17:47.28shaonssh,1,goto does not work
17:51.23shaonssi want, when user hangup(ofcourse after successful conversation) asterisk will ask me to choose another option
17:52.11Drukeni dunno if that's possible
17:52.26wildcard0you can put a goto in your h extension in that context
17:52.28Drukenunless you put in a g in your dialstring
17:54.40shaonssi tried  exten=>h,1,Goto(s,1) but still hangup after callee hangsup
17:55.14QwellWithout the spaces?
18:02.06*** join/#asterisk Tond (Tond@Toronto-HSE-ppp3646966.sympatico.ca)
18:02.57TondHi, i just updated my version of asterisk, and now I am having problems with cdr_addon_mysql.so
18:03.11Tondwhen i try to load it in my modules.conf * won't start
18:04.01Tondi ahve not made any config changes, and only uipdated * to the latest CVS head, ahs there been a change in the way i need to config the mysql_cdr?
18:04.13drumkillaupgraded from what
18:04.40drumkillafile: did you want an enormous orange road sign, too?
18:04.44filedrumkilla: nah
18:05.11TondI think what I had ws from Oct 04
18:05.27Tondso there are defebetky new config files i see in my /etc/asterisk folder
18:05.47drumkilladid you upgrade cdr_addon_mysql as well?
18:05.47Tondi also updated the /usr/src/asterisk-addons
18:06.05filedrumkilla: did you know you are very snuggly?
18:06.14drumkillafile: wrong channel!
18:06.21Tondwould it not come if i update asterisk-addons?
18:06.28filenah, right channel
18:07.00*** join/#asterisk Blackvel (~blackvel@dsl-213-023-034-149.arcor-ip.net)
18:09.23TondOh I think I found where i was wrong.  For some reason the asterisk-addon was not downloaded properly..  Thanks for the help hough..  :)
18:12.02*** part/#asterisk dimas (~ds@vbc.elcom.ru)
18:14.12Tondthis is wiered, now it doesn't write unique ID in the table anymore (cdr_mysql)
18:14.24Tondis this normal?  I mean is it part of the new changes?
18:18.14*** join/#asterisk jonathh1 (~asd@host-84-9-20-220.bulldogdsl.com)
18:18.16rvhianyone knows how to initiate a new call and play a message to a user?
18:18.42*** join/#asterisk Gunnar (~gunnar@34.80-203-209.nextgentel.com)
18:18.43jonathh1hello, i am having a problem with my grandstream. it seems making calls is ok. But when i recieve them, it does something such that my modem dies. any clues?
18:20.03Tondrvhi> I think what you are looking for is similar to the wake up call feature, look it up because i know * can do that
18:21.07rvhithx, i will check it out
18:21.41*** join/#asterisk key2 (~royal@gob75-2-81-56-64-17.fbx.proxad.net)
18:21.42key2hi
18:21.57key2on what linux should I install asterisk
18:22.05key2is there one more appropriated ?
18:22.36MikeJ[Laptop]key2, the best distro is the one you know the best
18:23.06key2well
18:23.12key2am more familiar with netbsd
18:23.23key2but not sure I could run asterisk on it
18:24.01MikeJ[Laptop]you can, but you will run into more issues, and there is a limited support for digium cards on netbsd
18:24.11key2ok
18:24.20key2so what linux should i get
18:24.33MikeJ[Laptop]the one you are most farmilliar with
18:24.42Qwelldistrowatch.com
18:24.44Qwellpick one...
18:25.41key2debian
18:25.41key2..
18:25.55Qwelldebian works fine
18:25.57Qwellas do many others
18:26.02MikeJ[Laptop]well not that one
18:26.05MikeJ[Laptop]:)
18:26.06MikeJ[Laptop]hehe
18:26.15Vcoslack has worked well for me...
18:26.53key2MikeJ[Laptop]: not debian?
18:27.18MikeJ[Laptop]joke
18:28.29jonathh1hello, i am having a problem with my grandstream. it seems making calls is ok. But when i recieve them, it does something such that my modem dies. any clues?
18:28.37jonathh1it cleans kills the router
18:28.47jonathh1adsl ready light goes off the lot.
18:29.05drumkillathat's actually pretty funny
18:29.09drumkillaimpressive, even
18:32.38jonathh1i aint kidding either
18:32.49jonathh1my asterisk install is at work
18:32.58jonathh1i can dial any extension.. but if i dial my own
18:33.07jonathh1(to get voicemail)
18:33.15jonathh1the modem dies.. i lose all connections
18:33.26*** join/#asterisk zeedo (~zeedo@www.bsrf.org.uk)
18:34.44Tondwhat is the purpuse of sip_notify.conf?
18:34.51TondI looked it up but didn't find much info on it
18:35.59jonathh1i dont know what to blame it on.. maybe asterisk is bombarding the router with connections.. and as none are forwarded (As of yet) it just dies
18:36.08*** join/#asterisk icexx (~jj@213.170.75.191)
18:36.17icexxany1 here?
18:36.17icexx<PROTECTED>
18:36.24jonathh1what ports would a grandstream need(it is the only one behind the nat)
18:36.37Qwell5060, 10000-20000 probably
18:37.02jonathh1the 5060 is for registration?
18:37.08jonathh1and the rest rtp for voice?
18:37.14Qwellpretty much
18:37.39jonathh1well it seems to register ok..
18:38.07jonathh1they all udp?
18:39.41Tondsip_notify.conf is not documented anywhere!  Anyone has any idea what it is for?
18:40.00drumkillait is to define SIP NOTIFY messages to send to phones
18:40.03drumkillauseful for remote reboots
18:40.13drumkillayou don't need to touch it
18:40.26TondOk, thanks...
18:40.30drumkillaused with the sip notify CLI command
18:40.41TondSo basically i will be able to reboot my phone using * right?
18:40.50drumkillaif you type 'sip notify' at the CLI, it will tell you how to use it
18:40.55drumkillasome SIP phones, yes
18:40.56Tondthnaks
18:41.03drumkillapolycoms for sure
18:41.15*** join/#asterisk Gunnar (~gunnar@34.80-203-209.nextgentel.com)
18:41.17drumkillathere are some other examples in there, not sure if they work or not
18:41.25*** join/#asterisk NewSole (dave@i216-58-44-245.avalonworks.net)
18:42.21Tondthanks
18:42.35*** join/#asterisk ardor (~ardorgof@ip24-253-102-105.lv.lv.cox.net)
18:42.48icexxhow do we solve this:
18:42.49icexxAttempting native bridge of SIP/phil-d61f and SIP/iconn-a554
18:42.49icexx<PROTECTED>
18:43.15Blackvelcodecs?
18:43.19icexxyeah
18:43.21Tondprobably
18:43.22icexxthink so ;)
18:43.23Blackveldisallow=all
18:43.25Blackvelallow=...
18:43.35ardorwhatever both sip phones support
18:43.48ardoryou could do allow=all
18:43.53ardorand let the phones figure it out
18:43.57icexxo.. lemme try allow=all
18:44.06icexxit's sjphone via asterisk to iconnecthere
18:44.11ardornot sure its a codec problem though.
18:45.05Tonddrunkilla> I guess the cisco part doens't funtion i send a notify to my 7960 and ain't getting anyhting back..  at least not the CLI and the debug is set to 90 :D
18:45.25drumkillaCLI won't say anything
18:45.28drumkilladoes the 7960 reboot?
18:45.31Tondno
18:45.47Tondi am trying snom now
18:46.07drumkillayeah ... doesn't work on mine, either
18:46.14Tondthe snom worked though
18:46.15Tond:D
18:46.27ardoricexx: how did it go?
18:46.31*** join/#asterisk aamin (~azher@203.175.65.172)
18:46.41*** join/#asterisk JerJer[mobile] (~nonyobizn@45.210.5.249)
18:47.08aaminhi ......... need some help on the Dial M(x) Macro option
18:47.16aaminhas anyone used this option
18:47.17aamin?
18:47.21aaminplz help
18:47.34drumkillaTond: I'm going to see if I can fix the Cisco one ...
18:47.45aaminit always says May  1 23:41:02 WARNING[5446]: app_macro.c:90 macro_exec: No such context 'macro-conference^99999' for macro 'conference^99999'
18:48.00ardoraamin not me, whats it suppost to do
18:48.21marloweIt's pretty english to me...
18:48.27marloweSays it's missing a context
18:48.41icexxardor: not good ;)
18:48.49drumkillaaamin: are you using 1.0 ?
18:48.51icexxMay  1 11:48:19 WARNING[6314]: chan_sip.c:2024 sip_write: Asked to transmit frame type 4, while native formats is 1 (read/write = 4/4)
18:48.59aamini am using 1.0.7
18:49.06aaminand here is the conext
18:49.07aamin[macro-conference]
18:49.07aaminexten => s,1,Wait(0.2)
18:49.07aaminexten => s,2,goto(demo,${ARGV1},1)
18:49.16drumkillaaamin: you can't send arguments in the Dial M() option in 1.0
18:49.22aaminany suggestions ??
18:49.28aaminhmmm
18:49.30drumkillayou can set variables before the Dial
18:49.35aamin:(
18:49.36drumkillaSetVar(MYVAR=alkdflakdsfj)
18:49.37ardoricexx: no idea
18:49.39drumkillaand use MYVAR in the macro
18:50.01aaminbut will these vars be accessible in the macro ???
18:50.07aaminok let me try ..........
18:50.08icexxMay  1 11:49:46 NOTICE[20624]: channel.c:1833 set_format: Unable to find a path
18:50.08icexxfrom g723 to slin
18:50.10drumkillathey should be, yes
18:50.11icexxwhat's this?
18:50.54Damindrumkilla: What up dude?
18:50.59drumkillahey Damin !
18:51.00*** join/#asterisk Jeet (~manjitr@207.168.236.99)
18:51.06drumkillain the middle of final exams :(
18:51.15Daminicexx: Seems like the PBX can't find a path from g723 to slin.
18:51.33Jeethi asteriskers..
18:51.38drumkillaDamin: trying to figure out why 'sip notify' won't work on my 7960
18:52.04aamini checked the variable is not accessible in the macro
18:52.08drumkillait looks good compared to all of the examples I can find
18:52.12*** join/#asterisk ManxPower (~eric@dsl-209-16-67-160.datasync.com)
18:52.20key2someone knows if asterisk can work with the chipset FA8357EP ?
18:52.24Damindrumkilla: That's nice.. I'm watching Pink Floyd: Pulse on DVD with my Three year old and my 9 month old. ;)
18:52.26drumkillaaamin: ah ... yeah, that makes sense, actually ...
18:52.35drumkillaDamin: ha, nice
18:52.44aaminhow can u explain ?
18:53.26DaminIt is almost time for them to take an afternoon nap..
18:53.29Jeetmake webvmail gives "No HTTP directory". any help appreciated.
18:54.15aamini think other than the globalvar there won't be an option ??
18:54.28Damindrumkilla: Movement, but no resolution or patches yet on the inband DTMF issue, but if you want to check the bug tracker (http://bugs.digium.com/bug_view_page.php?bug_id=0003847) you can see what we've come up with..
18:56.19Jeetwebvmail help please anyone.
18:56.20drumkillayeah, I saw that the issue had been finally identified
18:56.47Damindrumkilla: Basically, three case scenarios and what we think the behavior should be in Asterisk. Persnally, I think we are letting users get away with stupid stuff, but if that is part of the philosphy (I.E. complete the call at all costs) then I think we're moving in the right direction..
18:56.52drumkillaI probably won't have time to really work on it until I get to Huntsville next week
18:56.56aamindrumkilla: any guess to the variable issue
18:57.08Damindrumkilla: When you get a chance (no hurry) comment on it.
18:57.23drumkillaDamin: surely, I will ... I'm sorry it is taking so long to get all of this resolved
18:57.30DaminThat goes for all your other lazy bastards in this channel as well.. Get to work! There are 127 bugs on the bugtracker for cripes sake!
18:57.49drumkillawe're all so busy right now ... I have finals, then have to move to Huntsville
18:57.58drumkillaMark is ALWAYS insanely busy, but even moreso at the moment
18:58.03drumkillaand kevin is moving across the country
18:58.11drumkillaso the bug tracker isn't getting much lovin' :)
18:58.28Damindrumkilla: Don't apologize. It's not your job to fix bugs, and CORRECT solutions take time.. especially ones that don't break tons of other crap..
18:58.57drumkillayeah, this one is bigger than we thought
18:58.59Damindrumkilla: Everyone at Digium is slammed right now.. ;)
18:59.02ManxPower~docs
18:59.03jbotDocumentation can be found at http://digium.com/index.php?menu=documentation or http://www.digium.com/handbook-draft.pdf or #asterisk-doc, or http://www.voip-info.org/wiki-Asterisk, or http://www.asteriskdocs.org
18:59.33drumkillaDamin: yes, they are ... I'm not even there yet, and they have already started calling me, building up my to-do list
18:59.43Damindrumkilla: Hehehe...
18:59.51Damindrumkilla: Welcome to the fray my brotha..
19:00.18drumkillabut, I'm glad I'll have stuff to do :)
19:00.26drumkillait's better than ... being bored (yeah, right)
19:00.43drumkillaor I could be made to ... answer the phone!!!  AH!
19:00.59DaminYou know.. On the Learning to Fly tour, Pink Floyd had this totally hot, black haired, incredibly sexy French backup singer.. and I see that she is not with them on this tour..
19:02.03opus_does anybody have a 'follow me' implemented in asterisk so far?
19:21.08opus_how do I get asterisk to prompt for a number?
19:21.20opus_does dbget need a database setup with it?
19:21.52Tonddrunkilla> I think the reason the Cisco phone won't restart is, that it first tries to reach the TFTP server and if it gets no respond then it won't restart.  It may be a safety feature against the phone becoming unsuable after retsrat if the TFTP is down?!  What you think?
19:22.37*** join/#asterisk PCadach (~paul@www.east.telecom.kz)
19:23.36Tondbut what is puzzeling me still is that why in the new version of cdr_mysql, the "uniqueID" field is being left blank and not used?!
19:24.46drumkillayou're really probably better off migrating to cdr_odbc
19:25.12TondReally?  Why is that?
19:25.52shaonssSpawn extension (Dialout, 1000, 1) exited non-zero on 'Zap/1-1'
19:25.52shaonss<PROTECTED>
19:25.52shaonss<PROTECTED>
19:26.42drumkillaTond: it's what we support in the main tree of asterisk
19:26.52drumkillaand gets more attention than cdr_addon_mysql
19:28.08rvhitry to outgoing call file to make a call, is there a way to set any variables?
19:28.24ManxPowerI'm still trying to figure out why anyone would move to huntsville.
19:28.26TondI shall do the switch then..  :D
19:28.37rvhisimilar to setvar() before calling out
19:28.41drumkillaManxPower: to work for Digium?  :)
19:29.10drumkillarvhi: look at sample.call ... you can set vars in call files
19:29.32*** join/#asterisk firestrm (firestrm@S010600047577bccd.gv.shawcable.net)
19:29.44*** join/#asterisk pr0f1t (~pr0f1t@HSE-QuebecCity-ppp3502630.sympatico.ca)
19:30.37ManxPowerdrumkilla: But HUNTSVILLE?
19:30.38drumkillai love this sip notify command  :)
19:31.02firestrmanyone know which file in the zaptel source contains the ring patterns for fxs? the wiki tells of it, but does not specify how or where..
19:31.03drumkillaI know ... I told Mark that we should move Digium
19:31.10ManxPowerYEAH!
19:31.12Qwelldrumkilla: come to CA :p
19:31.12drumkillathough there are a lot of people there now ...
19:31.16drumkillathey probably wouldn't go for it
19:31.17drumkilla:(
19:31.38ManxPowerI wish Digium the best of luck to get good people to move to Huntsville.
19:31.39Qwellfirestrm: is that in indications.conf?
19:31.49ManxPowerThey have obviously had success so far.
19:31.59firestrmquell, no that has no effect on zap
19:32.06drumkillait's not such a bad place ...
19:32.08drumkillaI guess
19:32.17drumkillaI miss the coast, though :(
19:32.25Qwellwhich coast?
19:32.31firestrmQwell, at least http://www.voip-info.org/wiki-Asterisk+zap+channels says it doesnt
19:32.36drumkillahome was originally Charleston, SC
19:32.45Qwelloh, right
19:33.02drumkillaright now, in middle-of-nowhere SC
19:33.23firestrmQwell, the canned ring patterns, well.. suck.. i have got to change them
19:34.51QwellNote that the tone indications played to handsets connected to the Zap channel are NOT generated WITHIN Asterisk, but from the configurations of the Zaptel driver. You can configure the country in the zaptel driver's configuration file, zaptel.conf. To change the frequencies, you have to edit he source code in zonedata.c.
19:35.43firestrmQwell, ive scratched through zonedata.c but didnt see anything likely.. I'll have another look though
19:36.45ManxPowerI can't believe that there is no "through" audio file with Asterisk
19:36.57ManxPowernor a "to" audio file
19:37.03*** join/#asterisk key2 (~key2@gob75-2-81-56-64-17.fbx.proxad.net)
19:37.13*** join/#asterisk adjacent (~scott@64.203.220.105)
19:37.14key2hey
19:37.44key2what's the best for placing a call from IP using the FXO card of the PC ? SIP or H323 or something else ?
19:37.48ManxPower"Our business hours are Monday [missing] Saturday, 9am [missing] 5pm."
19:38.15ManxPowerkey2: H323 is never "best" for anything.
19:38.31*** join/#asterisk Sedorox (brandon@Neptune.client.wlmsprt.pa.sed6.net)
19:39.27key2ManxPower: so what else ?
19:39.32Vco;
19:39.44firestrmQwell, oops, ya its there.. i guess i was looking at the header file :)
19:39.47key2basically, how can I place a call from a softphone using the telephone line
19:40.01ManxPowerkey2: Asterisk doesn't CARE.
19:40.08Drukenif h323 was something physical, i wouldn't even use it as a doorstop
19:40.21uzdilluvator
19:40.24drumkillago iax!
19:40.24uzd?
19:40.26ManxPowerkey2: Use a SIP phone
19:40.47ManxPowerJust remember my motto: All softphones SUCK!
19:41.03QwellManxPower: there is a through.gsm
19:41.09DrukenManxPower: are you going to contribute the to or through?
19:41.32Qwelland to can be easily stripped from another file
19:41.45drumkillaindeed
19:41.53Drukengoogle has lots of allison gsm's too :)
19:41.57drumkillasomeone set up this tftp crap for my polycom phone, hehe ...
19:42.20ManxPowerQwell: I don't see it.
19:42.27QwellManxPower: cvs, asterisk-sounds
19:42.29ManxPowerI wanted ALLISON saying it.
19:42.31drumkillaasterisk-sounds ?
19:42.37uzdanyone have new voicemail notification on their phones? like asterisk@home does.. to make your voicemail light blink on your handsets
19:42.40ManxPowerWhy is it not in 1.0.x asterisk-sounds??
19:42.42firestrmwhere can i get more info on what the rintone patterns mean.. eg what the heck does 440+480/2000,0/4000 mean?
19:42.57key2ManxPower: so what's the best for calling from a pocketpc that has wifi ???
19:42.58uzdi have an analog phone connected to a PAP2-NA that talks SIP
19:43.08drumkillathere is no branch for asterisk-sounds
19:43.11ManxPowerkey2: I'm sorry, I cannot help you with that.
19:43.19Qwellkey2: friend of mine used sjphone, I believe
19:43.45ManxPower[root@fs-1 root]# grep though /home/software/asterisk/asterisk-sounds/sounds-extra.txt
19:43.45ManxPower[root@fs-1 root]#
19:43.49key2Qwell: and how does he route from sjphone to the telephone line ???
19:43.52QwellthRough
19:43.54Qwell:p
19:44.05Qwellkey2: he doesn't
19:44.14Qwellbut, go through an asterisk box, to a provider
19:44.27key2Qwell: so he can onyl call other IP
19:44.30ManxPowerAll that gives me is %call-quality-menu.gsm% and %accessible-through-system.gsm%
19:44.52QwellManxPower: cvs of asterisk-sounds is fairly stable.  heh
19:45.04*** join/#asterisk vvo (~michal@byo122.neoplus.adsl.tpnet.pl)
19:45.16ManxPowerQwell: drumkilla just said there's no branches of asterisk-sounds
19:45.34Qwellerr?
19:46.15drumkillaathxp asterisk-sounds # find .|grep -i through
19:46.16drumkilla./sounds/through.gsm
19:46.16drumkilla./sounds/accessible-through-system.gsm
19:46.35drumkillaooooooooh
19:46.40drumkillaBURNED!
19:46.47ManxPower[root@fs-1 asterisk-sounds]#  find .|grep -i through
19:46.48ManxPower./sounds/accessible-through-system.gsm
19:46.53Qwelldrumkilla: useless use of grep
19:47.03Qwellfind . -iname through
19:47.03ManxPowerdrumkilla: what is the date of ./sounds/through.gsm
19:47.16drumkillaQwell: sorry, I'm not leet  :p
19:47.25QwellJan 29, but thats probably the day I pulled it from cvs
19:47.45drumkillaJan 29 is when it was added
19:47.49drumkillaI just pulled mine and that's the date
19:47.53ManxPowerI wonder if it was removed.
19:48.05drumkillamine was a fresh checkout
19:49.24drumkillarevision 1.1
19:49.24drumkilladate: 2005/01/29 22:39:18;  author: markster;  state: Exp;
19:49.24drumkillaAdd new sounds (bug #3453)
19:49.34*** join/#asterisk Faithful (~Faithful@202.6.145.116)
19:49.40ManxPowerI wonder if I got something bad.
19:49.52drumkillamaybe  :/
19:49.52ManxPowerdrumkilla: I can -r v1-0 asterisk-sounds
19:50.00drumkillareally?
19:50.05ManxPowerdrumkilla: I can cvs co -r v1-0 asterisk-sounds
19:50.06drumkillathat's probably what you got, then, huh
19:50.17ManxPowerdrumkilla: you want to sync them up?
19:50.24drumkillaI'm not even sure if I can
19:50.40drumkillaadding new files to a tag might make cvs vomit
19:50.52drumkillaI don't even know if it will let me
19:50.54Qwellretag it, heh
19:50.59ManxPoweri'll kill my asterisk-sounds and checkout the cvs head version
19:51.15ManxPowerunless you can fix it, of course.
19:51.24drumkillaManxPower: I can add a note to the v1-0 makefile
19:51.55ManxPowerdrumkilla: can you remove the v1-0 asterisk-sounds?
19:52.00ManxPowerthen an error will be generated.
19:52.07drumkilladon't think so
19:52.22ManxPowerthat sucks
19:55.18drumkillaI wonder if the asterisk-sounds tarball came from v1-0
19:55.28drumkillaI think I got mark to just tar up the HEAD version
19:55.56ManxPowerthat would be bad.
19:56.10ManxPowermeans the tarballs and getting it from CVS are different
19:57.30drumkillanot the end of the world ...
19:57.54firestrmQwell, tried changeing the ring pattern in zonedata.c  no effect :(
19:57.59ManxPowerno, still annoying and as we can see, confuzzeling
19:58.29drumkillayes, that is annoying
19:58.30drumkillaand I'm sorry
19:58.36drumkillait's pretty useless to have that tag
19:58.59fileyay drumkilla
19:59.07drumkillaI added a little note, though
20:00.26firestrmanyone know how to change the ring cadence when passing the "r" parameter to a zap device? eg zap/2r2 ?
20:00.43ManxPowerWhoo!  Whoo!  I have it now!
20:00.45MeTaBSDcan i monitor all bw my asterisk take on my server ? how ?
20:02.26*** join/#asterisk angler (~angler@angler.digium.sponsor.pdpc)
20:04.08NewSoleQusetion who here has PRi's....
20:04.25blitzragedrumkilla: w00t
20:05.06drumkillablitzrage: !
20:05.25blitzragehow goes?
20:05.36drumkillashould be studying for my final exams
20:05.42drumkillainstead, I'm ... not.
20:05.55drumkillagoing to write a patch, I think
20:06.08blitzragelol
20:06.22blitzrageI just got back from Toronto - need to have a shower, get food and write more docs
20:08.12blitzrageI'm off - lates all.
20:08.36drumkillawheeeeee, cya blitzrage
20:12.08firestrmNewSole, i have pri's 250 area code
20:13.25Drukenwhere's 250 ?
20:14.12NewSolewas thinking... I have 5 blocks.... Toronto, Vancover, Ottawa, Soul Korea, Bejinn China
20:14.45Drukenottawa eh?
20:15.20NewSolewas thinking of starting a dundi like group where the requirments are you must share 5 or more channels off your pri
20:15.40*** join/#asterisk harryvv (~none@S010600055d210201.vs.shawcable.net)
20:16.21NewSoleto start I would have 4 of each offered
20:16.21NewSoleso total of 20
20:16.31ManxPowerAll of my PRIs are in places nobody wants to call. 8-)
20:16.42NewSolehey they all add up
20:17.05ManxPowerAnd we seldom call outside of Louisiana and Mississippi and we have unlimited free calls to those states.
20:17.14NewSoleand if we get enough.... we all could put a big dent in Voip calling rates
20:17.53firestrmNewSole, right now.. all mine are tied up in a wimax project
20:19.08firestrmarrgh.. im going to have to bite the bullet and pay digium support to fix their problem (mostly a crappy documentation issue)
20:19.16firestrmthat really burns me..
20:20.20blitzrageNewSole: its already been done - its all fwdout (formerly bellster)
20:20.27blitzrages/all/called
20:20.27firestrmyou would think they would at least document their hardware..
20:20.35harryvvfirestrm other then allstream or telus who else sells T-1's
20:21.01NewSolefirestrm... whats the problem
20:21.04firestrmharryvv, navigata.. kills SM(ellus) rates..
20:21.35firestrmNewSole, im trying to set ring cadences on zap hardware, and the documentation on this is vauge at best
20:21.36harryvvWhat pipe do thay use
20:22.10firestrmharryvv, they have their own apparently, but also use bigpipe(shaw).
20:22.24harryvvi see
20:22.46firestrmharryvv, $800/month for full pri + $2.50 per did
20:22.46harryvvso thay have infrastructor then.
20:22.46*** join/#asterisk Sedorox (~Brandon@Neptune.client.wlmsprt.pa.sed6.net)
20:22.51harryvvfire, thinktel said thay would charge 600 per month pri.
20:22.59harryvvthay are back east unfortunatly
20:23.18firestrmharryvv, ya out west, telus or navigate is the only options
20:23.21Drukenthat's because pri's are dirt cheap in edmonton :)
20:23.39NewSolefirestrm... what card
20:23.39harryvvahh i see
20:23.43firestrmtelus wants $6.00 per did here..
20:23.49firestrmNewSole, tdm400
20:23.51harryvvreally
20:24.10Druken6 bux a did? that's insane
20:24.13firestrmharryvv, yes.. like can you say .. pass the crack pipe..
20:24.25mgthI pay $8 per did with no per min charges
20:24.40firestrmbut then again telus had allways been smoking somthing..
20:25.15harryvvdrugs are not my thing thanks.
20:25.34harryvvwell, telus has had a monopoly.
20:25.35harryvv:)
20:25.53firestrmme neither.. but telus must be on somthing..
20:26.13harryvvoverhead cost
20:26.49firestrmwell.. im going to have to give up on my tdm400 problem.. at least until monday, when digium is open..
20:27.10firestrmback to other humdrum chores..
20:27.20harryvvwhats the problem with it
20:27.29firestrmcant set ring cadence
20:27.36harryvvohh
20:27.37firestrmon fxs ports..
20:27.47harryvvso what does it do constant ring?
20:27.48firestrmits really $#_#$#()*$ annoying..
20:28.29firestrmharryvv, well i can make it ring with other cadences, ive figured that out but the canned ones are really hard to distinguish between each other..
20:28.40NewSolefirestrm... I did somthing like that a while ago... let me pull it up... and compair to what you have
20:28.42*** join/#asterisk alt (~donovan@relay.gwsn.com)
20:28.48harryvvim not thrilled about Cisco pending buyout of Sipura.
20:29.13firestrmharryvv, why not.. they did great things for netgear
20:29.28firestrmmaybe they can get the sipura gear to work right..
20:29.52harryvvI have a hunch thay make make the atas and phones locked devices to a service.
20:30.02*** join/#asterisk E|nyPRI_ (~les@66.187.65.75)
20:30.04E|nyPRI_greetings
20:31.34NewSolefirestrm...
20:31.39firestrmyes
20:32.06NewSolecan you show me your setup
20:32.37firestrmNewSole, ok just a sec.. ill pastebin my zonedata.c
20:34.07firestrmNewSole, http://pastebin.ca/10731
20:34.11*** join/#asterisk burthold (burthold@cpe-66-69-194-217.austin.res.rr.com)
20:35.16*** join/#asterisk guugmember (~Casa@200.6.217.27)
20:35.19firestrmNewSole, im not even sure what im looking at here. the r parameter only takes 0-4, but there are over 22 enteries in zonedata
20:35.34firestrmso i dont even know which is who..
20:35.41guugmemberanyone from new zeland here_
20:35.42guugmember?
20:36.17NewSoleya but I never changes that....
20:37.14NewSolewhat are the values you want
20:38.53burtholdIs there a way to make asterisk not pick up a line if someone else picks it up or set the number of rings before it picks up on a pstn incoming line?
20:39.05NewSolefirestrm... look at http://pastebin.ca/10733
20:39.40*** join/#asterisk iq (~iq@65-103-167-17.omah.qwest.net)
20:39.56E|nyPRI_anyone know how I can get a incoming zap channel on asterisk ring a phone registered to ser?
20:40.39firestrmNewSole, i would like it to match the sipura ones..
20:41.13NewSoledo youo have the values
20:41.40guugmembershido6, hello, are you here?
20:41.40harryvvburt, yes
20:42.02harryvvburthold use the wait application
20:42.16NewSoleblitzrage.... you there
20:42.23burtholdwait application?
20:42.30guugmembershido6, can we talk about a new remote assistance service?
20:42.30harryvvwait 15 will put asterisk on hold for 3 rings before the server picks up the line.
20:42.39harryvvs,1,Wait(
20:42.50burtholdahh ok.
20:43.17harryvvactually no bracket
20:43.24harryvvits s,1,wait,15
20:43.26firestrmNewSole, from the regional tab of the spa3k, cadence 2=60(.3/.2,1/.2,.3/4) 3=30(.1/.1, .3/.1, .1/9.3) and 4= 30(.1/.1,.1/.1,.1/9.5) if i could get the r2 r3 and r4 zap parameter to match that would make me happy
20:43.28guugmemberanyone has worked with an avaya definity identifying cdrs sent when the call is terminated?
20:44.03harryvvburthold look at this
20:44.05harryvvhttp://asterisk.drunkcoder.com/Wait%20and%20Timeouts.pdf
20:44.47NewSoleblitzrage.... I was checking what you are talking about fwdOUT and that not for commercial.... I am talking commercial
20:45.09NewSolefirestrm... can you match it to http://pastebin.ca/10733
20:46.07guugmemberanyone here with avayas definity experience interested in giving payed remote assistance
20:46.13burtholdthanks!
20:48.00*** join/#asterisk Shoragan (~shoragan@d072.apm.etc.tu-bs.de)
20:48.35key2where can I find the asterisk manual?
20:49.10*** join/#asterisk bowman (~none@195.46.47.202.static.cablesurf.de)
20:49.38bowmanheya. can someone explain to me the x option of MeetMe?
20:50.43vvokey2: http://www.voip-info.org/wiki-Asterisk
20:53.28Qwellbowman: 'x' -- close the conference when last marked user exits
20:53.51firestrmNewSole, so its not changed in the zonedata.c?
20:54.26NewSolenope and I made mistake
20:54.29bowmanQwell: yeah. but this option doesn't make much sense. if I specify it,  I get hangup when only one (non-marked) user enters the room. if I put a second user in the conference with Meetme(number, x), nothing happens when he exits. so what is the sense of the option? ;)
20:54.52NewSole<PROTECTED>
20:54.53NewSole<PROTECTED>
20:54.53NewSole<PROTECTED>
20:54.53NewSole<PROTECTED>
20:54.53NewSole<PROTECTED>
20:59.41firestrmNewSole, you rock!! that seems to work perfectly.. i think im going to add that little tidbit to the wiki, for any other happless victims
21:01.45NewSolenp
21:01.45firestrmall i have to do now is translate the sipura cadences to the zaptel cadences
21:02.47NewSole:P
21:06.26*** join/#asterisk trimi` (~NaStradam@62.162.232.134)
21:07.38trimi`can anyone help me with installing a x100p on my fedora im tring all day with reading from voip-info.com but cant make it working
21:10.49Corydon76-homeIs it actually an X100P or a clone card?
21:10.50harryvvtrimi do a ztcfg -v
21:11.22vpphas anyone compiled asterisk recently?
21:11.33trimi`Notice: Configuration file is /etc/zaptel.conf
21:11.34trimi`line 145: No such tone zone known: de
21:11.34trimi`<PROTECTED>
21:11.34trimi`1 error(s) detected
21:11.34trimi`<PROTECTED>
21:11.34trimi`[root@localhost root]#
21:11.41trimi`i will try with US
21:11.44trimi`just a sec
21:11.50vppor can tell me the gcc version on a box they have compiled 1.0.7 on, but not upgraded gcc?
21:11.54harryvvtrimi do a modprobe wcfxo and modprobe zaptel
21:12.14harryvvvpp, yes everyone has.
21:13.17vppwell my problem is that the current gcc version cannot compile asterisk 1.0.7, pwlib 1.5.2 and openhh323_1.12.2
21:13.32harryvvmine is not current
21:14.00trimi`harryvv
21:14.02trimi`now i got this
21:14.04trimi`2 channels configured.
21:14.04trimi`<PROTECTED>
21:14.04trimi`ZT_CHANCONFIG failed on channel 2: Invalid argument (22)
21:14.04trimi`Did you forget that FXS interfaces are configured with FXO signalling
21:14.04trimi`and that FXO interfaces use FXS signalling?
21:14.32trimi`is this a problem cuz i got 2 x100p on same pc
21:14.41vppi need an older gcc i think
21:14.51MikeJ[Laptop]trimi`, use pastebin please
21:14.51vppok can u do a gcc -v and tell me what version your running?
21:14.54MikeJ[Laptop]~pastebin
21:14.55jbotsomebody said pastebin was a place to paste your stuff without flooding the channel - try http://pastebin.ca
21:15.02vppi'd like to know a version that works so i can downgrade mine to it :)
21:15.33harryvvtrimi, google that then fix the error
21:15.54*** join/#asterisk teletel (~telefoni@ACB7A5F3.ipt.aol.com)
21:16.20MikeJ[Laptop]vpp, what version are you running?
21:16.31trimi`i dont understand what you mean with google that ?
21:17.02bowmanis meetme agi implemented in 1.0.7?
21:17.04teletelDoes anybody know how much the DS3000P will be roundabout?
21:17.05vpp3.4.something... so just re-installing the machine now so cant tell u exact
21:17.21MikeJ[Laptop]your gcc is fine
21:17.25vpp*sorry just re-installing the machine now so cant tell u exact
21:17.44MikeJ[Laptop]version wise at least
21:17.56vppMikeJ[Laptop]:  well it goes something like this! if i download asterisk 1.0.7 i need those pwlib and openh323 versions
21:18.04vppbut pwlib fails to compile as does openh..
21:18.25vppif i checkout asterisk (latest dev version) with pwlib 1.9.0 and openh 1.17.1 everything compiles fine, and runs find..
21:18.38vppexcept i have the RTP bug.. where its sending the ip address as 127.0.0.1
21:18.52vppthat should have been fixed on 0.7.1 but something has broken it again :(
21:19.24MikeJ[Laptop]ummmm, so the issue is that some of the h323 stuff is picky?  I have no idea on that, sorry
21:19.38Corydon76-homeWell, it's stabley broken
21:20.04vppwell.. i read that something changed with the makefiles, and so new gcc can't compile old pwlib,openh and/or asterisk and vice versa
21:20.14harryvvThe realestate bubble soon to explode
21:20.33Corydon76-homeHow new of a GCC?
21:21.01vppwell i saw it somewhere googling around.. so i dont know the specifics.. lets treat it as 'romour' because i'm no expert
21:21.13*** join/#asterisk niZon (~ilt@S0106deadbeef6977.wp.shawcable.net)
21:21.45vppi saw on the bug tracker the RTP 0.0.0.0 or 127.0.0.1 is an old bug..
21:22.11Corydon76-homeGreat...
21:22.13vppi even modified rtp.c myself, but the bug seems to be in the open_ch323.c
21:22.48vppthere seems to be an ongoing saga about asterisk knowing the real interface address
21:22.50Corydon76-homeHave you opened a bug report yet?
21:23.19vppwell i wanted to do a bit more work myself, by confirming the stable release IS ok with this configuration
21:23.29vppdont wanna waste their time!
21:24.02vppbut i cant compile 1.0.7 with those pwlib/openh323 so i might just have to open a bug report
21:25.10vppdoes anyone here know about the asterisk code?  i had assumed that even for the openh323 channel driver it would use the rtp.c to form the RTP sockets ?
21:34.04*** join/#asterisk mgth (~chatzilla@dsl093-001-038.det1.dsl.speakeasy.net)
21:37.12*** join/#asterisk niZon (~ilt@S0106deadbeef6977.wp.shawcable.net)
21:39.23*** join/#asterisk Nethab (~chatzilla@adsl-67-113-141-170.dsl.sntc01.pacbell.net)
21:40.33Nethabyawn
21:40.43sivanais there a way to have an agent/queue working only during certain hours, then only use voicemail or something?
21:40.53Nethabyes
21:41.03sivanado you have a macro for that? :)
21:41.11JerJer[interop]macro?
21:41.12JerJer[interop]lol
21:41.16JerJer[interop]that's funny
21:41.32Nethabyou can define includes based on time
21:41.39sivanahehe
21:41.49Nethabhttp://www.voip-info.org/wiki-Asterisk+tips+openhours
21:42.09sivanacool.. thanks
21:42.37NewSolehmmmmmmm....
21:42.51bowmanshhiiiiiiiaaaaaaat :)
21:43.18Nethabsunnnnni
21:43.36Nethabkuuuuurrrrds
21:44.09vpplol
21:56.11mozratHey guys - any kphone and asterisk users here?? seems dtmf doesn't work :
21:56.12mozrat:(
21:56.30*** join/#asterisk ktsaou (~kvirc@195.97.5.192)
21:56.34Qwellmozrat: try changing your dtmfmode
21:57.48*** join/#asterisk kb1_kanobe (~krisbouti@h24-207-80-55.cst.dccnet.com)
21:59.04mozratQwell: Hmm, there's no option for that in the preferences... no man page... nothing in /usr/share/docs/kphone and kphone --help or -h just starts it
21:59.14mozratit's a kphone --use-the-force-luke application then
21:59.16Qwellmozrat: in * I mean
21:59.26mozratQwell: ahhh
21:59.33mozratok -thanks
21:59.42mozratat least * is well documented :-)
22:03.35*** join/#asterisk trimi` (~NaStradam@62.162.232.134)
22:07.54*** join/#asterisk voip0 (~orwall@ottawa-hs-64-26-147-227.d-ip.magma.ca)
22:08.03mozratQwell: oh well, didn't work
22:08.10mozrattried all 3 for that sip peer
22:08.12QwellDid you reload?
22:08.16mozratyes
22:08.30Nethabdtmfmode = inband
22:08.32Nethab?
22:08.33mozratrunning inband generated a load of incompatible errors
22:08.41mozratahh
22:08.51mozratmaybe I should disallow gsm for that peer
22:09.02mozratit was saying you can't use inband with gsm
22:09.33*** join/#asterisk r0d3nt (~RatMan@wsip-24-234-241-84.lv.lv.cox.net)
22:10.11mozrat:D
22:10.17voip0Hello everybody; which softphone is better gnomemeeting or linphone? I have Asterisk installed but I still need a softphone to place calls
22:10.23mozratthanks Qwell, Nethab
22:10.29mozratdisallow gsm and force inband
22:10.30mozratcheers
22:10.51Nethabgno phone you mean voip0?
22:11.01Nethabgnophone
22:11.11voip0is that GPL?
22:11.15Nethabyes
22:11.36voip0would it be in Ubuntu packages?
22:11.42Nethabdon't know
22:11.47voip0sorry for asking
22:11.48Nethabwww.gnophone.com
22:11.56voip0I will check
22:15.18voip0thanks Nethab
22:15.28Nethabnp
22:15.30voip0it's just what I wanted
22:15.42Nethabit's like christmas in may
22:15.52voip0exactly
22:15.55voip0bye
22:16.02*** part/#asterisk voip0 (~orwall@ottawa-hs-64-26-147-227.d-ip.magma.ca)
22:22.31Corydon76-homeIsn't gnophone still iax1-only?
22:29.27NewSoleQusetion here have PRi's Setup....
22:30.06A-Tuinanyone know if asterisk can be made to be a "text compatible phone"
22:32.47Mavvieasterisk isn't a phone.
22:34.24A-Tuinyeah I know, but as it handles my calls I want to see if I can receive text messages through it via zap
22:34.50JerJer[interop]that is called SMS
22:34.55A-Tuinnope
22:35.45A-Tuinhttp://www.bt.com/bttext/index.html <- got one of these through the other night, except it gave me my message while ogm was running on voicemail
22:36.28JerJer[interop]yes that is called SMS
22:37.21A-Tuinwow, k I stand corrected. Thought it was bt messing with their callerid again
22:37.55Drukensms on a landline?
22:38.38*** join/#asterisk clinthome (~clinthome@va-chrvlle-cad1-bdgrp5-8d-209.chvlva.adelphia.net)
22:39.14A-Tuinthat's what I thought, there anything on the wiki I can get more info for this searching seems a bit vague for me
22:39.39JerJer[interop]read the *
22:39.40JerJer[interop]<PROTECTED>
22:42.34A-Tuinthe only calling features I have are caller id, and going from what I caught in the voicemail left I've a compatible line, just need to be able to handle the "call" within *
22:42.53*** join/#asterisk dgilmore (~dennis@12-203-146-64.client.insightBB.com)
22:45.42*** join/#asterisk r0d3nt (~RatMan@wsip-24-234-241-84.lv.lv.cox.net)
22:48.45burtholdSo, I need 20 good cheap phone voice quality over bells and whisles.
22:58.47NethabBritish Telecom has SMS over their landlines
22:59.38NewSoleQusetion.... anyone here have PRi's.... we have 5 trunks and we are looking to share 4 channels off those trunks though a dundi type service to those willing to do the same....
23:03.01tzafririf I have a voip provider that uses iax and I get a new connection, to which iax peer will that connection go?
23:03.42tzafrirIn the docs for setting up a connection to FWD I see that you must use the peer name "outfwd"
23:04.25tzafrir(or is it fwdout?)
23:06.25tzafrirsorry, iaxfwd
23:07.11Nethabyou don't *have* to name it that, but a descriptive name is recommended
23:07.25Nethabto help identify it in the config and logs
23:08.12Nethaband to choose which provider you call out, you provide the peer name in the dial command
23:12.00mozrat"This is not a valid conference number, Please try again!"
23:12.01mozratgrrrr
23:12.23mozratIs meetme this hard to setup or am I fscking it up badly?
23:12.48mozratmeetme.conf: conf => 8990,8990
23:13.16tzafrirjust had this becase ztdummy was not loaded
23:13.22mozratexten => 500,1,MeetMe(8990||8990)
23:13.42tzafrir(and then I relized iax trunking also probably needs it)
23:14.03mozrattzafrir: right
23:15.16bowmanmozrat: got timing straight?
23:16.27*** join/#asterisk iheartcanada (~iheartcan@lfc.tor.istop.com)
23:17.11mozratbowman: appears not :)
23:17.20mozrathaving a search for ztdummy now
23:17.26mozratI don't appear to have it at all
23:17.41bowmanit's in the zaptel package
23:17.49bowmanuncomment it in the makefile
23:18.04bowmanmake, make install, modprobe zaptel, modprobe ztdummy, off you go ;)
23:18.55mozratbowman, tzafrir ta :)
23:19.47bowmannp :)
23:19.58puowvipbuh
23:20.46mozratsurprised it's not included in the Debian zaptel package
23:21.08bowmanphew, debian packages... no good :)
23:21.25mozratbowman: Bah ;)
23:21.39bowmanI love Debian :)
23:22.07bowmanget the zaptel-source package, as I said you have to modify the Makefile. probably this was not done for the debian zaptel package.
23:22.31puowvipDebian might fully support Asterisk by 2012
23:23.35bowmanI run it on Debian, but self-compiled :-)
23:23.52*** join/#asterisk bonez39 (~aint@c-67-166-77-14.hsd1.ut.comcast.net)
23:24.31tzanger~seen jerjer
23:24.34jbotjerjer <~JerJer@DSL-226.206-rt-bras.che.centurytel.net> was last seen on IRC in channel #asterisk, 3d 18h 24s ago, saying: 'try ulaw or gsm'.
23:24.49tzangerdammit jbot needs a pattern match
23:25.15Nethabyeah, jerjer's been [interop] for a couple days
23:25.25tzanger~seen jerjer[interhop]
23:25.27jboti haven't seen 'jerjer[interhop]', tzanger
23:25.30sivana{}
23:25.31tzanger~seen jerjer[interop]
23:25.33jbotjerjer[interop] <~nonyobizn@45.210.5.249> was last seen on IRC in channel #asterisk, 45m 53s ago, saying: '    * Requires text compatible phone, BT Caller Display and compatible line. Some calling features affect use of SMS service.'.
23:25.39tzangerdammit
23:25.53sivanaheh
23:26.19Nethablooking for the international house of pancakes again
23:35.02bonez39does asterisk take much flack from the established PBX community?
23:35.32Qwellbonez39: Only because we take their wives, jobs, and houses.
23:35.44ScaredyCatand their cars
23:35.54Drukentheir wives?..... i don't want their old wives....
23:35.55Nethabflack? no, they don't even acknowledge it's existense
23:35.55QwellScaredyCat: the cars are included with the wives
23:35.56drumkillawell, at the last VON in San Jose, CA ... the Asterisk pavilion was more than twice the size of any other booth there
23:35.59Drukenmaybe their daughters...
23:36.19Nethabtheir mistresses
23:36.29ScaredyCattheir matresses
23:36.36bonez39Nethab, ah, the old ignore trick...eh?
23:36.38Qwellmatresses come with the houses
23:36.48Nethabalthough cisco did just buy up sipura
23:36.50ScaredyCattell that to the wives
23:37.18DrukenNethab: that gives cisco the complette rights to the firmware
23:37.55Drukenfrom what i hear, the linksys pap2 might as well be a sipura .... 200?
23:38.01Nethabyeah better download while we can. WilliamK just got the new version to connect a 33.6 kbps modem connection over a sipura 2000
23:38.35iheartcanadakeep talking about daughters...interesting.
23:38.57Nethabfathers be good to your daughters... you mean like that song
23:39.55Drukenthank christ i don't have a daughter... i'd kill the dirty lil bastard who tries to get in her pants
23:40.16bonez39cisco did? does that mean now that I'll end up paying more to buy a sipura box?
23:40.21Nethabin her pants, what is she doing wearing pants to begin with
23:40.39Nethabno it means you won't get an AC adapter with it
23:40.49iheartcanadaa while back i asked someone here about whether the hardware asterisk hooks up can be talked to with standard jtapi/tapi apis, and they laughed at me :(
23:40.50Nethabstupid PoE
23:40.51Drukenhahaha
23:41.03Drukenthe linksys comes with a nice ac adaptor
23:41.11bonez39Druken, sounds like sage words from a grown man who was once also a horny young boy....
23:41.13Nethabbut does linksys provider PoE
23:41.28NewSoleQusetion.... anyone here have PRi's want to make free calls.... we have 5 trunks and we are looking to share 20 channels off those trunks though a dundi type service to those willing to share 4 channels off thier PRI....
23:41.30Nethaball i see are PoE recivers on the wireless access points
23:41.37Drukenbonez39: was once? pfft.. still is
23:41.42bonez39I jsut have three little oversexed boys....that I nave to control..and warn to keep away from the girls..
23:42.07Nethabgirls are stupid and crazy
23:42.27bonez39that's what I tell my boys...
23:42.33bonez39and that they all have cooties..;)
23:42.33iheartcanadaare there any good books to get a basic grounding on how telephone networks work? words like PRI, Trunk, Channel, Dundi, just greek to me.
23:43.59Nethabhow bout a simple explanation
23:44.12d-techPSTN 4 dummies
23:44.27Nethaba PRI is a Primary/Premium Rate Interface
23:44.36Nethabor another word for telephone line
23:44.36mozratbowman - did all that, ztdummy loaded fine. Still same problem :( Is there some sort of config to be done for ztdummy?
23:44.37iheartcanadaNethab: thx
23:44.52iheartcanadaNethab: but i don't want to waste your time....
23:44.58Nethaba BRI is a Basic Rate Interface commonly over ISDN
23:45.11Nethabit's ok I just make this stuff up anyways
23:45.32NethabPRI is commonly over T1 or possible DS-1 or DS3
23:45.45iheartcanadaif there are no book, it's alright, maybe they will publish one in the near future
23:45.47Nethaball of which are copper connections to the phone company
23:46.07Nethabthere isn't one book, this stuff goes back decades
23:46.21iheartcanada...
23:46.32iheartcanadaNethab: thank you for explaining
23:46.35Nethabthe PSTN is the Public Switched Telephone Network, think of it as the Internet of phone systems
23:47.17Nethaba Trunk is a bunch of lines or calls over the same line or connection
23:48.45iheartcanadalol, nethab, your explanations are crystal clear, but i am really confused
23:48.59iheartcanadalet me look on amazon
23:49.14NewSoleanyone ever get that "switch" function to work in dial plan example "switch = IAX2/someuser:somepass@somehost.com/context"
23:49.21NethabDUNDI is a voip technology people try to use to publish their ENUM directories, and ENUM is a list of all your phone numbers and VoIP equivelants
23:49.49Nethabdon't worry i just like to hear myself talk
23:50.17NewSoleat least someone is talking in channel
23:50.29iheartcanadalistening to you is like a telephony guy listening to me explain what is a custom entity class
23:50.32bonez39Nethab, here's one...how many pairs are in a T1 ?
23:50.42bonez39is it like a huge fat trunk of wires...or not really?
23:50.43iheartcanada:)
23:51.09NewSoleQuestion.... anyone here have PRi's want to make free calls.... we have 5 trunks and we are looking to share 20 channels off those trunks though a dundi type service to those willing to share 4 channels off thier PRI....
23:51.43Nethabi know what an entity class is
23:51.50Nethabi'm actually a web programmer
23:51.56iheartcanadaNethab: sweet
23:52.23Nethaba t1 can go over 1 pair or 10 it's a signaling spec
23:52.24iheartcanadaso i guess you aren't just a telephony guy, but i really am not a telephony guy :(
23:52.57iheartcanadathat limitation, it's making my education of asterisk a real headache
23:53.19Nethabactually i'm writing my own asterisk management interface as a Firefox extension
23:53.25bonez39so if someone say, thumping their chest..they have a T-1 at their work....it just means they have that signaling spec..doesnt' really mean much about their capacity....or how many pairs they have?
23:53.52Nethabin the same way they can say they have a frame relay or an ATM line
23:53.53iheartcanadabonez39: from what i heard, T1 is anywhere from 1 ISBN to partial to a full T1
23:54.08bonez39Nethab, you raise another question..I really like that extension..useragentswitcher..but it tends to crach my firefox....
23:54.08iheartcanadaISBN = 64K+64K bytes
23:54.09Nethabyou can have a fractional T1
23:54.16iheartcanadaISDN i mean
23:54.33Nethabtwo ISDN B channels are 112kbps
23:54.42bonez39ISBN means....book identifier
23:54.47Nethabyeah hehe
23:55.02iheartcanada56K+56K then
23:55.10bonez39some tell me..any extension will eventually 'break' firefox..can that be true?
23:55.24Nethabdefine break
23:55.34bonez39I hate having to run IE...just to use a site that wants to see IE..instead of firefox
23:55.38iheartcanadabonez39: if they are sharing the same memory space, it's possible
23:55.58Nethabyou can create an extension with a bad overlay that completely messes up the chrome of the browser
23:56.02bonez39break, as in...can't run firefox...without starting it in safe mode...disabling the offending extension and then starting firefox
23:56.20Nethabso you can't use it yes
23:56.31Nethabany number of bad XPCOM stuff can do that
23:56.45bonez39so it's how the extension is written...apparently useragentswitcher is poorly written and allows two applications to write in each others memory?
23:57.18bonez39I see chrome.. is that the interface for firefox?
23:57.29NethabXPCOM components are C compiled stuff that can have memory problems just like every other app
23:57.52Nethabchrome is the stuff you see that's not part of a web page yes
23:58.04bonez39Nethab, ok....maybe I should write to the useragentswitcher author and ask about his use of XPCOM
23:58.44Nethabit could be any number of things
23:58.50bonez39here's another question..sometimes i will get a movie file..a .wmv  that won't play in firefox....nor will it play using vlc ....I just get audio instead of audio and video..
23:58.51Nethabxpcom is just one
23:58.55bonez39ok...
23:59.11bonez39whateverit is...useragentswitcher uses some code that doesn't behave correctly
23:59.47Nethabyeah most likely

Generated by irclog2html.pl by Jeff Waugh - find it at freshmeat.net! Modified by Tim Riker to work with blootbot logs, split per channel, etc.