| 01:40.28 | *** join/#asterisk-doc snuff-away (n=nffot@220-253-12-190.VIC.netspace.net.au) |
| 03:43.22 | *** join/#asterisk-doc snuff-away (n=nffot@220-253-12-190.VIC.netspace.net.au) [NETSPLIT VICTIM] |
| 03:45.30 | *** join/#asterisk-doc MuffinMan (n=muffins@neutrino.joshua-colp.com) |
| 03:51.59 | *** join/#asterisk-doc snuff-away (n=nffot@220-253-12-190.VIC.netspace.net.au) [NETSPLIT VICTIM] |
| 04:36.39 | *** join/#asterisk-doc MuffinMan (n=muffins@neutrino.joshua-colp.com) |
| 05:03.56 | *** join/#asterisk-doc snuff-away (n=nffot@220-253-12-190.VIC.netspace.net.au) |
| 05:05.59 | *** join/#asterisk-doc MuffinMan (n=muffins@neutrino.joshua-colp.com) |
| 05:26.41 | *** join/#asterisk-doc MuffinMan (n=muffins@neutrino.joshua-colp.com) |
| 06:00.10 | *** join/#asterisk-doc MuffinMan (n=muffins@neutrino.joshua-colp.com) |
| 07:41.37 | *** join/#asterisk-doc wyoming (n=steve_mu@216.166.159.235) |
| 13:46.03 | *** join/#asterisk-doc Juggie (n=Juggie@CPE001601df17fb-CM001a6682d7b6.cpe.net.cable.rogers.com) |
| 13:46.03 | *** join/#asterisk-doc brac (i=fugalh@falcon.fugal.net) [NETSPLIT VICTIM] |
| 15:33.32 | *** join/#asterisk-doc jsmith_ (n=jsmith@68-246-38-7.area3.spcsdns.net) |
| 15:34.04 | *** mode/#asterisk-doc [+o jsmith] by ChanServ |
| 15:48.21 | *** join/#asterisk-doc blitzrage (n=Leif@asterisk/documenteur-extraordinaire/blitzrage) |
| 15:48.21 | *** mode/#asterisk-doc [+o blitzrage] by ChanServ |
| 16:11.32 | blitzrage | jsmith: ping! |
| 16:11.48 | jsmith | blitzrage: No! |
| 16:11.53 | jsmith | Ok, just kidding... Pong! |
| 16:12.16 | blitzrage | haha... I'm wondering if you might have a minute to help me figure out how the best way is going to be to structure the CLI reference |
| 16:12.44 | blitzrage | I can't decide if I should break it down by root action, or if I should do something like what 'help' shows |
| 16:13.03 | blitzrage | I'm starting to think about leaning towards the latter |
| 16:13.11 | blitzrage | but I started last night with the former |
| 16:14.42 | jsmith | I don't like what help shows |
| 16:14.57 | jsmith | I'd break it down by root action, myself |
| 16:15.09 | blitzrage | I don't see a good way of grouping things together inside the root action though.... |
| 16:15.54 | blitzrage | the way help shows it certainly lends itself to the format of the appendix easily enough (Name header) |
| 16:37.21 | jsmith | blitzrage: Sorry, getting bombarded |
| 16:37.30 | jsmith | blitzrage: Gimme a few more minutes... it's not that impressive |
| 16:37.33 | blitzrage | fair enough... I'm gonna go clean up a bit I think |
| 16:37.43 | blitzrage | my apt is a mess, and I"m having a party tomorrow :) |
| 16:38.04 | file | ooh a party |
| 16:41.19 | blitzrage | ya... I can't believe how long it took me to do the CLI audit last night... although it wasn't quite as bad as I at first suspected |
| 18:09.05 | Juggie | blitzrage: ANTROPOV :0 |
| 18:09.19 | blitzrage | haha... hawtness :) |
| 18:09.24 | Juggie | :) |
| 18:26.48 | blitzrage | they'll win just enough to screw it all up though and get 9th place instead of being at the bottom and getting some good draft picks |
| 18:28.59 | Juggie | blitzrage hah perhaps |
| 18:29.11 | Juggie | but if you look @ the stats the leafs are like 3 points out of 4th |
| 18:29.22 | Juggie | or 2nd if you ignored the divisions |
| 18:54.00 | blitzrage | Juggie: hrmmm... how far has ottawa fallen? |
| 18:54.10 | blitzrage | it would be super sweet if the leafs and ottawa made it 4/5 |
| 18:56.38 | Juggie | blitzrage, still in 1st |
| 18:56.41 | Juggie | by like 4pts |
| 18:56.47 | Juggie | (in the est) |
| 19:00.04 | blitzrage | crazyness |
| 19:00.07 | blitzrage | they were that far ahead.... |
| 21:35.34 | *** join/#asterisk-doc blitzrage (n=Leif@asterisk/documenteur-extraordinaire/blitzrage) |
| 21:35.34 | *** mode/#asterisk-doc [+o blitzrage] by ChanServ |
| 21:43.48 | *** join/#asterisk-doc ctooley (n=ctooley@doc-72-47-33-80.maryville.mo.cebridge.net) |
| 21:46.32 | *** join/#asterisk-doc wyoming (n=steve_mu@216.166.159.235) [NETSPLIT VICTIM] |
| 23:00.23 | wyoming | wyoming?\ |
| 23:00.26 | wyoming | Hmmm |
| 23:01.44 | codefreeze | yes, file? |
| 23:07.14 | codefreeze | file: yes? Hello? |
| 23:08.47 | file | no reason for the poke |
| 23:15.35 | codefreeze | a reasonless poke? A random poke? A poke for poke's sake? a pig's poke without the pig? |
| 23:16.44 | codefreeze | What was the look on your face, when you poked me? That would be your "poker face" |
| 23:17.14 | codefreeze | Well, file, there are many questions to answer now. |
| 23:31.41 | codefreeze | awwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwww |