00:11.13 | Alric | Funny how your day can go from bad to hellua bad in the blink of an eye. |
00:11.19 | Alric | err, from good to hellua bad :) |
00:27.41 | *** join/#asterisk-doc jsmith-away (n=jsmith@000-150-930.area3.spcsdns.net) |
00:27.42 | *** mode/#asterisk-doc [+o jsmith-away] by ChanServ |
00:51.53 | Alric | This is a roller coaster. |
01:00.29 | jsmith-away | What is?!? |
01:00.34 | Alric | This install |
01:00.45 | Alric | afk moving |
02:30.35 | *** join/#asterisk-doc jsmith-away (n=jsmith@000-150-930.area3.spcsdns.net) |
02:30.35 | *** mode/#asterisk-doc [+o jsmith-away] by ChanServ |
02:59.08 | blitzrage | who the heck wants a girl who has no experience? |
02:59.13 | blitzrage | I for one, certainly do not |
02:59.20 | blitzrage | there's nothing wrong with a girl who likes sex |
03:00.19 | blitzrage | I guess I'm really just talkiing to myself and Juggie |
03:09.10 | Juggie | :) |
03:09.18 | Juggie | there were no hotties @ the gym today |
03:12.23 | blitzrage | that sucks |
03:12.32 | blitzrage | I love going ot the gym and oggling |
04:12.42 | Juggie | yesterday was a good day |
04:12.53 | Juggie | although two good looking girls came in as i was leaving today |
04:12.59 | Juggie | but they were probally 18,19 |
04:13.22 | Juggie | a little young for me, well at least if my friends found out :) |
04:17.36 | blitzrage | Juggie: that's the perfect age |
04:18.10 | Juggie | shush :) |
04:18.41 | blitzrage | lol |
04:18.51 | blitzrage | at least in looks -- they are stupid as fuck |
04:19.03 | blitzrage | if I found a genious 19 y/o... damn :) |
04:19.38 | Juggie | in my expirence anything younger then 23 is unstable. |
04:21.24 | blitzrage | totally agreed |
13:03.46 | *** join/#asterisk-doc bkruse_home (n=kruz@69.73.127.92) |
13:40.38 | *** join/#asterisk-doc jsmith_ (n=jsmith@000-150-930.area3.spcsdns.net) |
13:41.33 | *** mode/#asterisk-doc [+o jsmith] by ChanServ |
13:55.59 | *** join/#asterisk-doc bkruse_home (n=kruz@69.73.127.92) |
14:21.07 | *** join/#asterisk-doc jsmith (n=jsmith@000-150-930.area3.spcsdns.net) |
14:21.07 | *** mode/#asterisk-doc [+o jsmith] by ChanServ |
14:30.09 | *** join/#asterisk-doc jsmith (n=jsmith@000-150-930.area3.spcsdns.net) |
14:30.09 | *** mode/#asterisk-doc [+o jsmith] by ChanServ |
14:35.11 | *** join/#asterisk-doc blitzrage (n=blitzrag@asterisk/documenteur-extraordinaire/blitzrage) |
14:35.11 | *** mode/#asterisk-doc [+o blitzrage] by ChanServ |
15:24.01 | *** join/#asterisk-doc jsmith (n=jsmith@000-150-930.area3.spcsdns.net) |
15:24.01 | *** mode/#asterisk-doc [+o jsmith] by ChanServ |
15:26.31 | blitzrage | jsmith: !!! |
15:26.38 | blitzrage | can I ask a stupid question? |
15:26.53 | jsmith | There are no stupid questions... |
15:28.11 | blitzrage | ...only stupid people :) |
15:28.30 | blitzrage | oh I think I just realized my issue... |
15:29.44 | blitzrage | I was wondering where Asterisk kept the database structure for members of a queue -- but it's just using the option names as the columns for the table, so it's not "statically" defined anywhere. It just says, "hey, I need the value for member 'foo' and the values for the following options" |
15:30.09 | blitzrage | so basically, to see the table structure, I just need to go look at the sample file and find which options there are :) |
15:30.16 | blitzrage | thanks jsmith! :) |
15:30.45 | jsmith | It's kept in AstDB |
15:30.54 | jsmith | 'database show QUEUE' |
15:32.08 | blitzrage | hrmmm... doesn't seem to be |
15:32.10 | blitzrage | even when in a queue |
15:32.34 | jsmith | Static queue members, or dynamic queue members, or agents? |
15:32.47 | blitzrage | static queue members |
15:33.15 | blitzrage | just adding them to the ast_queue_members table, with the columns "queue_name", "interface", "penalty" |
15:33.27 | blitzrage | I guess that is dynamic right? |
15:33.37 | blitzrage | where static is statically defined in the queue.conf file? |
15:34.14 | jsmith | No. |
15:34.35 | jsmith | Dynamic is adding them using the manager interface or "AddQueueMember" and "RemoveQueueMember" applications from the dialplan |
15:34.41 | blitzrage | aha -- gotcha |
15:35.06 | blitzrage | I do have those too in another area where I use the queue for something else |
15:35.32 | blitzrage | the reason I ask is because Paul wants to change the table stucture |
15:37.30 | Juggie | sounds like your talking about realtime queues? |
15:38.19 | blitzrage | indeed |
15:38.27 | Juggie | realtime is a monster i dont understand |
15:38.38 | Juggie | that being said, you can add fields to the table |
15:38.44 | Juggie | and it wont break anything |
15:39.07 | blitzrage | I realize I can add them, but Paul wants to change the columns that Asterisk would actually be using |
15:39.25 | blitzrage | realtime isn't really all that bad -- it's reasonably intuitive |
15:39.27 | Juggie | change the names? |
15:39.35 | blitzrage | correct |
15:39.40 | Juggie | why? |
15:39.41 | blitzrage | it's still early :) |
15:40.10 | blitzrage | I won't get into it because its not really necessary, but basically its for DB design for the GUI |
15:40.20 | blitzrage | so the GUI is easier for him to code |
15:40.35 | Juggie | well, he can do whatever he wants |
15:40.38 | blitzrage | so I was wondering if I could maybe change the SELECT statements Asterisk was using |
15:40.58 | Juggie | if only it were that easy :) |
15:41.14 | Juggie | what he could do would be to create a view for * to use which emulates the * table structure. |
15:41.46 | blitzrage | he can't "do whatever he wants" because I doubt Asterisk is going to go find which queue is being referenced in the "queue_name" table if there is just the ID number of the queue instead of the queue name in text |
15:41.59 | blitzrage | yah... I have a feeling he'll just end up working around it :) |
15:42.26 | Juggie | as i said, he can design his queue table in whatever way he desires so long as his view makes it look like the asterisk table. |
15:43.39 | blitzrage | damn you views! :) |
15:43.48 | Juggie | well, think of a view like a fake table. |
15:43.53 | blitzrage | I know what a view is :) |
15:44.03 | Juggie | ok then, well then you should understand why that would work just fine :) |
15:44.03 | blitzrage | O |
15:44.24 | blitzrage | yes, I can alter the view -- I can't just make the table anything I want, which is what you said |
15:44.33 | blitzrage | and then you mentioned view, which is different :) |
15:44.54 | Juggie | indeed, you can make it what you want, so long as within your view it looks like the old table, all will be good. |
15:45.24 | Juggie | hopefully your db of choice supports updating views too |
15:45.29 | Juggie | so if * tries to do that it will work |
15:45.42 | blitzrage | ideally. Not sure if pgsql does that or not to be honest |
15:47.05 | blitzrage | ok coolio -- thanks Juggie. I'm going to make eggs and hashbrowns now |
15:47.24 | blitzrage | I keep seeing these commercials for how eggs give you energy, so I'm gonna give it a shot :) |
15:47.33 | Juggie | haha |
15:47.40 | Juggie | have a bagle and penut butter |
15:47.56 | blitzrage | I have no bagels, and I don't like things with just peanut butter |
15:48.29 | Juggie | bagles are good for you, and they keep well in the freezer. |
15:48.49 | blitzrage | yah, my room mate buys |
15:48.53 | blitzrage | ...them |
15:49.00 | Juggie | and they give you the craps |
15:50.08 | blitzrage | fiber'll do that |
15:50.11 | blitzrage | ok, back in a bit |
15:50.17 | blitzrage | time to go watch sportscentre |
15:50.28 | blitzrage | and food of course |
15:50.32 | Juggie | the leafs suck as bad as they did last week :( |
15:53.51 | jsmith | blitzrage: Sorry, I wasn't ignoring you -- just had a couple of high-priority things I had to take care of :-( |
15:58.08 | blitzrage | jsmith: totally understood |
16:07.52 | jsmith | Juggie: You haven't undergone your sensitivity training yet... let alone learned how to spell it ;-) |
16:09.04 | Juggie | ummm, thats a canadian spelling :P |
16:19.27 | *** join/#asterisk-doc Alric (n=nbowyer@69.154.73.178) |
16:19.35 | Alric | Hey |
16:19.54 | Alric | Anyone know how to override the Polycom's insistance on resetting the volume to its default level for each call? |
16:19.56 | jsmith | Hey Alric! |
16:20.06 | jsmith | No clue... |
16:20.07 | Alric | I know I've seen how to do it somehow... |
16:20.11 | jsmith | Did you look in the Admin guide? |
16:20.40 | Alric | Don't have one handy |
16:20.51 | Alric | hrm |
16:20.53 | Alric | this is really strange. |
16:21.54 | Alric | A script I made to bring the pagers into their own conference rooms is running even when I tell it not to. |
16:21.56 | Alric | Very strange. |
16:23.19 | jsmith | <PROTECTED> |
16:23.19 | jsmith | default configuration parameters, the receive handset/headset volume resets to nomi- |
16:23.19 | jsmith | nal after each call to comply with regulatory requirements. Refer to 4.6.1.8.2 Volume |
16:23.19 | jsmith | Persistence <volume/> on page 110. |
16:24.19 | Alric | Yeah, grabbing the admin guide too. |
16:26.06 | Alric | argh |
16:26.06 | Alric | Transitioning from a key system to a PBX is always such a hassle. |
16:26.06 | jsmith | voice.volume.persist.handset |
16:26.22 | jsmith | voice.volume.persist.headset |
16:26.32 | Alric | Cool cool |
16:26.58 | jsmith | voice.volume.persist.handsfree |
16:28.18 | Alric | Got employees harassing me to pick up "line 3" |
16:28.18 | Alric | They want SLA. |
16:28.19 | jsmith | It's coming... |
16:28.19 | jsmith | ... very soon now... |
16:28.19 | Alric | Except 1.4 doesn't work for me. |
16:28.19 | Alric | So it doesn't matter anyway. |
16:28.19 | jsmith | Yes... it's being rewritten |
16:28.19 | jsmith | It'll be in 1.4.1 |
16:28.19 | Alric | I can't imagine my audio problem will get fixed by 1.4.1 |
16:30.35 | jsmith | Not until you can really show us the problem, no |
16:30.54 | Alric | I have full console debugs + ethereal traces. |
16:30.57 | Alric | But only from my end. |
16:31.01 | Alric | I can't really get the other end. |
17:05.53 | blitzrage | jsmith: another dumb question :) |
17:06.02 | jsmith | Yes?!? |
17:06.07 | blitzrage | the msgnum column in the voicemessages table -- what is that for? |
17:06.23 | blitzrage | because I see two msg's set as '0', which seems to indicate "read" |
17:06.37 | blitzrage | but if I switch the other two messages to 0 manually, my MWI doesn't go away.. |
17:06.38 | jsmith | Interesting... |
17:06.53 | jsmith | Well, if they're still in the INBOX, the MWI won't go out |
17:07.00 | jsmith | You have to move them to OLD |
17:07.00 | blitzrage | aha -- you're right |
17:07.11 | blitzrage | aha!!! |
17:07.16 | blitzrage | that is why I have two msg 0's |
17:07.18 | jsmith | but I don't see why you'd have two of them set the msg 0 |
17:07.22 | blitzrage | one is in Old, the other in INBOX |
17:07.25 | jsmith | Oh. |
17:07.29 | jsmith | Then it's perfectly valid |
17:07.31 | blitzrage | so good -- no bug found! :) |
17:07.33 | jsmith | The first message is 0 |
17:07.34 | blitzrage | yep, you're right |
17:07.35 | jsmith | The second is 1 |
17:07.37 | jsmith | etc |
17:07.38 | blitzrage | I didn't see the dir column |
17:07.52 | *** kick/#asterisk-doc [Alric!n=blitzrag@asterisk/documenteur-extraordinaire/blitzrage] by blitzrage (I still have ops suckah! :)) |
17:08.14 | blitzrage | oh nice -- my rogers box just went down.. |
17:08.15 | *** join/#asterisk-doc Alric (n=nbowyer@69.154.73.178) |
17:08.28 | Alric | You mean "You still can powertrip"! |
17:08.37 | blitzrage | yes I can |
17:08.53 | blitzrage | yep -- that's what it looks like :) |
17:09.46 | blitzrage | they upgraded the FFWD the other day -- gave me a fourth speed so it doesn't take 3 minutes to FFWD to the end of a 30 minute show |
17:09.51 | Alric | line appearances, whatever |
17:19.38 | Alric | gosub() looks like goto to me., |
17:19.51 | Alric | Doesn't have a built-in method of passing variables! |
17:19.52 | blitzrage | it is, but with a return |
17:20.03 | blitzrage | yes it does if you grab the app_stack from svncommunity |
17:20.08 | Alric | no no |
17:20.14 | Alric | passing variables to it |
17:20.15 | blitzrage | yes it does -- I'm using it |
17:20.16 | Alric | not getting them out |
17:20.22 | blitzrage | ARGx is what you're talking about |
17:20.25 | blitzrage | adn yes, I'm doing that |
17:20.26 | Alric | ARGs, yeah. |
17:20.30 | Alric | with app_stack? |
17:20.32 | blitzrage | yes |
17:20.35 | Alric | oh |
17:20.35 | blitzrage | from svncommunity |
17:20.45 | Alric | What the heck is svncommunity? |
17:20.52 | blitzrage | Macro(Macro(func_odbc())) == segfault |
17:21.03 | Alric | I don't stack Macros...NEXT! |
17:21.05 | blitzrage | GoSub(GoSub(GoSub(func_odbc)))) != segfault |
17:21.24 | blitzrage | http://svncommunity.digium.com/view |
17:21.38 | blitzrage | I use both app_stack and func_odbc from there on 1.2 |
17:21.42 | blitzrage | (and 1.4) |
17:22.06 | Alric | func_odbc isn't in 1.2? |
17:22.23 | *** topic/#asterisk-doc by blitzrage -> Happy Asterisk 1.4.0! Without risk, we would never know the core learning of our mistakes. |
17:22.36 | blitzrage | don't think so |
17:22.37 | Alric | Inspirational. |
17:22.48 | blitzrage | and not with DB failover |
17:22.52 | blitzrage | not even in 1.4 |
17:23.14 | Alric | strange. |
17:23.25 | blitzrage | because it was made after feature freeze |
17:23.27 | Alric | dangit |
17:23.27 | Alric | I want 1.4 |
17:23.31 | blitzrage | you have it |
17:23.35 | blitzrage | it's call svn |
17:23.39 | Alric | I don't have functional 1.4 :( |
17:31.07 | Alric | The problem is... |
17:31.22 | Alric | They just say "if 1.2 works and 1.4 doesn't, its a PBX problem. you fix it" |
18:00.57 | blitzrage | this laptop power brick is keeping my right foot warm :) |
18:01.56 | Alric | hehe |
18:02.16 | Alric | gotta go |
18:56.07 | Alric-Ofce | Ahem, I do. |
19:35.50 | *** join/#asterisk-doc blitzrage (n=blitzrag@asterisk/documenteur-extraordinaire/blitzrage) |
19:35.50 | *** mode/#asterisk-doc [+o blitzrage] by ChanServ |
21:42.23 | Alric-Ofce | Noo |
21:42.28 | Alric-Ofce | Don't leave us! |
21:42.47 | jsmith | Gotta take the scouts camping (in the cold) |
21:42.50 | jsmith | Back tomorrow |
23:22.02 | *** join/#asterisk-doc jbot (i=ibot@pdpc/supporter/active/TimRiker/bot/apt) |
23:22.02 | *** topic/#asterisk-doc is Happy Asterisk 1.4.0! Without risk, we would never know the core learning of our mistakes. |