| 01:18.20 | *** join/#arm-netbook lkcl (~lkcl@cpc4-fare6-2-0-cust31.6-1.cable.virginm.net) |
| 01:34.30 | *** join/#arm-netbook stefanro (~stefan@pD958A665.dip0.t-ipconnect.de) |
| 01:52.34 | *** join/#arm-netbook Marex (~Marex@195.140.253.167) |
| 03:14.16 | *** join/#arm-netbook Quarx (~Quarx@62.182.198.189) |
| 04:15.53 | *** join/#arm-netbook Marex (~Marex@195.140.253.167) |
| 05:09.20 | *** join/#arm-netbook Marex (~Marex@195.140.253.167) |
| 06:45.39 | *** join/#arm-netbook gsilvis (~andovan@c-75-67-201-167.hsd1.ma.comcast.net) |
| 07:33.43 | *** join/#arm-netbook Marex (~Marex@195.140.253.167) |
| 07:44.31 | *** join/#arm-netbook rellla (~rellla@p4FE56E5A.dip0.t-ipconnect.de) |
| 08:30.31 | *** join/#arm-netbook gimli_ (~gimli@xbmc/staff/gimli) |
| 08:40.14 | *** join/#arm-netbook Marex (~Marex@195.140.253.167) |
| 08:50.35 | *** join/#arm-netbook eFfeM (~frans@c73189.upc-c.chello.nl) |
| 09:36.38 | *** join/#arm-netbook atiti (~atiti@0x3ec6d37b.inet.dsl.telianet.dk) |
| 09:53.19 | oliv3r | lkcl: i'm not adding anything that's not submitted; I actually found many flaws with the script.fex and told that person to try again :p |
| 09:53.45 | oliv3r | lkcl: and 'permission' sounds a bit harsh, if someone random submits stuff; but i'll keep your wishes in mind, and rather have you do the submitting |
| 09:54.25 | oliv3r | lkcl: anyway, mmc2 and mmc3, so mmc3 is connected as 'sd' slot on the eoma68 card itself, good, but mmc2 has its pins brought out? |
| 09:54.57 | oliv3r | lkcl: in that case, sunxi-u-boot is only usefull to do that factory-installing and the current u-boot boards.cfg is wrong and invalid |
| 09:56.20 | oliv3r | lkcl: you cannot boot from mmc3 (as boards.cfg states now) The BROM never ever will try to boot from mmc3. What boards.cfg says now though, which can work, is "If I boot from whatever SPL, (e.g. sunxi-u-boot spl stored on nand, which is actually possible) I will then boot the main u-boot from mmc3 and load the kernel etc from mmc3 |
| 09:56.44 | oliv3r | tl;dr, boards.cfg MMC=3 needs to be changed to MMC=2 to be valid |
| 10:14.12 | *** join/#arm-netbook Marex (~Marex@195.140.253.167) |
| 11:07.05 | *** join/#arm-netbook acassis (~alan@177.182.59.133) |
| 11:11.05 | *** join/#arm-netbook rz2k (~rz2k@188.244.38.171) |
| 11:11.28 | *** join/#arm-netbook Marex (~Marex@195.140.253.167) |
| 11:55.01 | *** join/#arm-netbook ganbold__ (~Ganbold@173.244.215.173) |
| 12:00.32 | *** join/#arm-netbook Quarx (~Quarx@176.62.119.146) |
| 13:02.35 | *** join/#arm-netbook popolon (~popolon@unaffiliated/popolon) |
| 13:55.42 | *** join/#arm-netbook wingrime (~wingrime@78.109.115.103) |
| 14:06.52 | *** join/#arm-netbook atiti (~atiti@0x3ec6d37b.inet.dsl.telianet.dk) |
| 14:40.52 | *** join/#arm-netbook atiti (~atiti@0x3ec6d37b.inet.dsl.telianet.dk) |
| 14:50.33 | *** join/#arm-netbook datagutt (~datagutt@unaffiliated/datagutt) |
| 15:09.49 | *** join/#arm-netbook atiti (~atiti@0x3ec6d37b.inet.dsl.telianet.dk) |
| 15:11.38 | *** join/#arm-netbook hht (~chatzilla@unaffiliated/hg-5/x-8664886) |
| 15:16.32 | *** join/#arm-netbook wingrime (~wingrime@78.109.115.103) |
| 15:26.52 | *** join/#arm-netbook nashpa (~nashpa@dliviu.plus.com) |
| 16:22.41 | *** join/#arm-netbook Quarx (~Quarx@tsn85-159-237-4.dyn.nltelcom.net) |
| 16:28.54 | *** join/#arm-netbook Quarx|2 (~Quarx@tsn85-159-237-4.dyn.nltelcom.net) |
| 17:44.14 | *** join/#arm-netbook Dessimat0r (znc@199.180.119.231) |
| 17:47.30 | *** join/#arm-netbook rz2k (~rz2k@188.244.38.171) |
| 17:51.44 | *** join/#arm-netbook Kraln (~kraln@69.169.90.240) |
| 20:26.21 | *** join/#arm-netbook popolon (~popolon@og-free.planet-service.fr) |
| 20:26.30 | *** join/#arm-netbook popolon (~popolon@unaffiliated/popolon) |
| 21:25.43 | *** join/#arm-netbook tuliom (~tuliom@2001:1291:200:8528:1e6f:65ff:fe48:945b) |
| 21:55.07 | lkcl | oliv3r: we will be trade-marking EOMA68. if anyone submits a fex file without my authorisation they risk jeapordising the entire project. so yes, permission it is. |
| 21:55.25 | lkcl | oliv3r: yes, mmc2's pins are on the EOMA68 connector. |
| 22:06.23 | lkcl | oliv3r: i've already had to tell people on public forums that they are not authorised to say what goes into the EOMA68 specification. |
| 22:07.00 | lkcl | oliv3r: it was an individual who was making a product for sale, who risked putting their entire company at risk of lawsuits *AND* bringing the EOMA68 specification into disrepute |
| 22:07.17 | lkcl | oliv3r: by claiming that they had the authority to make revisions to it. |
| 22:07.51 | lkcl | oliv3r: i had to explain to them in no uncertain terms that they had no such authorisation, apologise to *their* clients that they had been misled, and provide the correct information. |
| 22:08.43 | lkcl | oliv3r: that sort of thing is unacceptable and it starts with the submission of files - to you - which have not been vetted by me, the designer and guardian of the EOMA68 specification. |
| 22:08.54 | lkcl | oliv3r: so when i say "permission", i *mean* "permission". |
| 22:09.01 | lkcl | apologies for having to spell that out. |
| 23:51.33 | *** part/#arm-netbook mnemoc (~amery@geeks.cl) |