| 00:00.06 | slapin_ | Marex: how cheap, any links? |
| 00:01.34 | mnemoc | slapin_: i only know the <math /> extension, but just tested and doesn't take \begin ... only basic expressions |
| 00:04.08 | mnemoc | f* 115.com ... now you can only download stuff if you have an account :| |
| 00:05.09 | slapin_ | mnemoc: what is 115.com? |
| 00:06.20 | slapin_ | mnemoc: at least latex can make pdf/ps and these can be attached. |
| 00:07.58 | mnemoc | slapin_: the chinese dropbox where chinese manufacturers share their update images :| |
| 00:08.21 | mnemoc | slapin_: attached, but not shown inline |
| 00:18.27 | Turl | mnemoc: tried http://bugmenot.com/view/115.com ? |
| 00:19.09 | mnemoc | Turl: uh |
| 00:19.15 | mnemoc | Turl: didn't know that site :) |
| 00:21.25 | Marex | slapin_: I dunno ... but I'll be getting one sometimes during summer |
| 00:23.43 | Turl | mnemoc: bugmenot is the best thing since sliced bread when it comes to logging in to stuff :) |
| 00:24.16 | Turl | esp. those nasty forums with "log in to see the link" >.< |
| 00:24.18 | mnemoc | Turl: account worked. but i'm now request to pay to download the crap |
| 00:47.46 | slapin_ | mnemoc: what were you looking for on 115.com? |
| 00:48.27 | mnemoc | the firmware update for a phone |
| 00:49.38 | slapin_ | mnemoc: hmmm... |
| 00:50.14 | slapin_ | is wrong again - a gold mine is turned into pile of shit... |
| 00:50.26 | mnemoc | ? |
| 00:50.59 | slapin_ | got a plan for next step with NAND stuff... |
| 00:51.18 | slapin_ | good night, all! |
| 00:51.30 | mnemoc | good night slapin_ |
| 00:53.37 | *** join/#arm-netbook L84Supper (~ly@unaffiliated/l84supper) |
| 01:01.19 | mnemoc | hno: reverted to lichee/lichee-dev, boots, but no greeting either.... shy u-boot |
| 01:06.08 | mnemoc | "sunxi: add uart output to sd default"... that's why |
| 01:06.26 | mnemoc | need another board |
| 01:07.58 | *** join/#arm-netbook tuliom (~tuliom@186.214.49.135) |
| 01:09.26 | *** join/#arm-netbook bsdfox (~Bob@c-71-197-83-152.hsd1.ca.comcast.net) |
| 01:09.27 | *** join/#arm-netbook bsdfox (~Bob@unaffiliated/bsdfox) |
| 01:11.54 | mnemoc | much better |
| 01:35.00 | mnemoc | hno: btw, spl also halts on reboot after `reset`ing from nand's u-boot :| |
| 01:42.07 | *** join/#arm-netbook stefanro1 (~stefan@p57B94D26.dip.t-dialin.net) |
| 01:44.36 | *** join/#arm-netbook popolon (~popolon@og-free.planet-service.fr) |
| 03:06.53 | *** join/#arm-netbook freakazoid0223 (~matt@pool-173-75-233-172.phlapa.fios.verizon.net) |
| 03:18.22 | *** join/#arm-netbook tzafrir_laptop (~tzafrir@212.179.75.202) |
| 03:20.04 | discopig | hi |
| 03:25.29 | *** join/#arm-netbook alcides (~alcides@177.35.118.65) |
| 03:25.29 | *** join/#arm-netbook alcides (~alcides@unaffiliated/alcides) |
| 04:25.11 | *** join/#arm-netbook L84Supper (~ly@adsl-75-59-203-17.dsl.emhril.sbcglobal.net) |
| 04:25.19 | *** join/#arm-netbook L84Supper (~ly@unaffiliated/l84supper) |
| 04:43.52 | *** join/#arm-netbook RITRedbeard (~redbeard@c-68-37-165-37.hsd1.nj.comcast.net) |
| 04:46.45 | *** join/#arm-netbook RITRedbeard (~redbeard@c-68-37-165-37.hsd1.nj.comcast.net) |
| 04:56.34 | *** join/#arm-netbook tekzilla (~jon@hmbg-5f763a82.pool.mediaWays.net) |
| 06:12.28 | *** join/#arm-netbook Quarx (~Quarx@178.74.79.135) |
| 06:30.35 | *** join/#arm-netbook aaribaud (~aaribaud@2a01:e35:2eb9:20:250:43ff:fe01:dc73) |
| 08:12.44 | *** join/#arm-netbook fredy (~fredy@147.102.32.34) |
| 08:53.49 | libv | mnemoc, Turl: i am perfectly happy with this change, as back when i had the crash, i was using too weak a powersupply |
| 08:54.16 | libv | and my feeling is that it was the higher power draw of the higher clock that caused this crash |
| 08:55.09 | libv | i should've actually sent a follow up to that email, stating that these test results were all but reliable |
| 09:32.57 | RaYmAn | hmm..funky.. Chromebook uses OMAP armsoc driver for OMAP5432, which apparently uses Mali T60x |
| 09:34.15 | RaYmAn | (incidentally, not exactly what TI's docs say, so perhaps it's a funky google change) |
| 09:47.30 | mnemoc | libv: does it still act weird if you use the weak psu? |
| 09:48.03 | libv | i cannot tell now, i am 700kms away :) |
| 09:48.22 | mnemoc | RaYmAn: i read some time ago linaro was making an agnostic x11 mali driver.... might it be that one? |
| 09:48.24 | mnemoc | libv: :) |
| 09:48.39 | mnemoc | libv: but the current head of sunxi-3.0 works well for you? |
| 09:50.47 | libv | it did, at least yesterday, and the clocking fix is untested, but i am not worried about it, i am reasonably sure it was the psu now |
| 09:51.06 | mnemoc | :) |
| 10:13.20 | *** part/#arm-netbook aaribaud (~aaribaud@2a01:e35:2eb9:20:250:43ff:fe01:dc73) |
| 10:21.27 | *** join/#arm-netbook Sternennebel (~martin@p5494BB50.dip.t-dialin.net) |
| 10:23.42 | *** join/#arm-netbook popolon (~popolon@og-free.planet-service.fr) |
| 10:36.56 | stefanro1 | mnemoc: good news, i have ethernet (wemac) working on my cubieboard in u-boot :) |
| 10:37.19 | stefanro1 | mnemoc: still needs heavy cleanup though before ready for submission to the list |
| 10:37.47 | stefanro1 | mnemoc: will hit the list probably on Monday or Tuesday |
| 10:37.51 | mnemoc | \o/ |
| 10:38.11 | stefanro1 | mnemoc: then there is no need to swap MMC's for new kernels etc |
| 10:40.18 | mnemoc | I normally do it keeping two uImage files, with the testing booting by default. but tftp is obviusly simpler |
| 10:41.33 | mnemoc | and it's nicer to the poor card |
| 10:41.50 | stefanro1 | yep |
| 10:42.32 | mnemoc | btw, do you reproduce the halt on reboot problem? |
| 10:43.07 | mnemoc | weirdly I noticed yesterday that if I boot from nand's u-boot, plug the card, and `reset`. it halts too |
| 10:43.10 | stefanro1 | not from within u-boot - "reset" from u-boot reliably reboots the board |
| 10:43.28 | stefanro1 | does the reboot problem only happen when rebooting from Linux? |
| 10:44.02 | mnemoc | that was my thought until I started playing with hno's fixed lichee-dev uboot |
| 10:44.17 | stefanro1 | <PROTECTED> |
| 10:44.34 | stefanro1 | i'm currently using "sunxi-current" |
| 10:44.35 | mnemoc | a drop-in replacement to the u-boot.bin in stock tabs |
| 10:44.49 | mnemoc | but the reboot problem is not there |
| 10:44.51 | mnemoc | I mean |
| 10:45.15 | mnemoc | mmc-spl halts after `reset` on lichee-dev's u-boot.bin too |
| 10:45.22 | *** join/#arm-netbook wingrime (~alex@78.109.115.103) |
| 10:46.05 | mnemoc | mmc-spl from sunxi and sunxi-current |
| 10:47.06 | mnemoc | lichee-dev work is only to have a quick solution to let people booting from nand use our kernel without allwinner boot hacks |
| 10:47.43 | stefanro1 | i see - perhaps i can find some time to investigate here next week |
| 10:50.16 | mnemoc | :) |
| 11:46.50 | *** join/#arm-netbook rellla (~Thunderbi@p4FE56058.dip0.t-ipconnect.de) |
| 11:48.10 | *** join/#arm-netbook t0dbld1 (~t0dbld@50.33.195.166) |
| 12:15.29 | *** join/#arm-netbook benjamin__ (~benjamin@c-94-255-220-30.cust.bredband2.com) |
| 12:18.44 | *** join/#arm-netbook von_fritz (~fritz@host221-176-dynamic.0-87-r.retail.telecomitalia.it) |
| 12:21.39 | *** join/#arm-netbook penguin42 (~dg@tu006.demon.co.uk) |
| 12:54.23 | *** join/#arm-netbook Gumboot (~gumboot@rev.bovine.muck.net.nz) |
| 13:13.00 | mnemoc | anyone around running a customer kernel from nand on A10/A13? |
| 13:17.07 | Turl | mnemoc: customer? you mean custom? |
| 13:17.13 | Turl | I am |
| 13:17.15 | mnemoc | yes |
| 13:17.18 | mnemoc | neat :) |
| 13:17.42 | mnemoc | Turl: running 3.0 with ignore atag mem stuff... right? |
| 13:17.51 | Turl | yep mnemoc |
| 13:19.06 | mnemoc | Turl: can you test if replacing linux/u-boot.bin with http://dl.linux-sunxi.org/amery/testing-3.4/u-boot.bin lets you run both, your current kernel and a variant with ignore atam mem disabled? |
| 13:19.13 | *** join/#arm-netbook tinti (~tinti@bhe201062162119.res-com.wayinternet.com.br) |
| 13:19.49 | Turl | mnemoc: I'm running 3.0, shouldn't matter right? |
| 13:19.59 | mnemoc | right, should be fine |
| 13:20.15 | Turl | mnemoc: is it functionally equivalent to the stock uboot? |
| 13:20.31 | Turl | (eg, can it boot boot.imgs?) |
| 13:20.32 | mnemoc | yes |
| 13:20.57 | mnemoc | it only behaves better letting us drop allwinner boot hacks |
| 13:23.05 | mnemoc | so you shouldn't notice any difference |
| 13:24.25 | Turl | handles axp for battery stuff too right, or was that on boot0/1? |
| 13:24.47 | Turl | well, it seems to boot my 'hack'ful kernel |
| 13:24.47 | mnemoc | boot0/boot1 |
| 13:25.30 | mnemoc | after you confirm it works well, can you try with a kernel with allwinner boot hacks disabled? |
| 13:30.10 | Turl | -CONFIG_SUNXI_IGNORE_ATAG_MEM=y |
| 13:30.11 | Turl | +# CONFIG_SUNXI_IGNORE_ATAG_MEM is not set |
| 13:30.15 | Turl | mnemoc: ^ anything else? |
| 13:30.19 | mnemoc | just that |
| 13:44.14 | Turl | mnemoc: doesn't seem to wanna boot |
| 13:44.48 | mnemoc | :( |
| 13:45.09 | Turl | can't debug any further as I don't have serial on it |
| 13:45.22 | Turl | but it's stuck on the bootloader logo |
| 13:46.04 | mnemoc | and not adb yet, right? |
| 13:46.30 | Turl | no adb indeed |
| 13:47.06 | Turl | no 'screen weirdness' due to the higher clock on PLL6 either |
| 13:47.08 | mnemoc | and that kernel is a recent sunxi-3.0 |
| 13:47.27 | mnemoc | ? |
| 13:47.38 | Turl | yeah, sunxi HEAD+ my stuff on top |
| 13:48.32 | Turl | mnemoc: https://dl.dropbox.com/u/553461/VID_20121022_034404.mp4 |
| 13:48.47 | Turl | that is caused by PLL6 @1.2Ghz on linux |
| 13:49.07 | mnemoc | uh |
| 13:49.35 | Turl | it's probably that something on the boot chain earlier set it to 960Mhz |
| 13:49.45 | Turl | and it's just on boot so not a major issue imo |
| 13:52.50 | Turl | maybe libv knows what is it and how to fix it :P |
| 14:11.40 | *** join/#arm-netbook kop (~kop@c-67-185-30-133.hsd1.wa.comcast.net) |
| 15:47.31 | Gumboot | What do "Systems on module" plug into? |
| 15:51.31 | mnemoc | dimm slot usually |
| 15:53.31 | Gumboot | DIMM slot in what? |
| 15:53.59 | mnemoc | in a base board with tons of connectors :) |
| 15:55.04 | mnemoc | but there are options, the odroid-x also uses a "system on module", http://www.hardkernel.com/renewal_2011/products/prdt_info.php |
| 15:55.48 | mnemoc | basically it's a board without connectors doing all the complex/expensive stuff |
| 15:56.30 | mnemoc | some call them core boards, others cpu boards, others system on module, other daugther boards, .... |
| 16:01.00 | Gumboot | So there's no fantastically-well-established standard, then? |
| 16:01.24 | mnemoc | Gumboot: http://elinux.org/Embedded_Open_Modular_Architecture/EOMA-68 :) |
| 16:01.50 | mnemoc | Gumboot: that's officially the topic of this channel :p |
| 16:04.04 | Gumboot | Yeah. How's that coming along, anyway? |
| 16:04.35 | mnemoc | only lkcl knows :< |
| 16:05.01 | mnemoc | he is discussing about a 2xpcmcia server standard |
| 16:15.53 | lkcl | que? |
| 16:16.16 | mnemoc | too late |
| 16:16.20 | mnemoc | he left |
| 16:16.30 | lkcl | ehh no problem. |
| 16:18.10 | lkcl | things are quite advanced - he must be on the arm-netbooks list - i'm puzzled that he's asking "what do SOMs plug in to" |
| 16:18.35 | lkcl | i saw him around quite a while back now |
| 16:19.40 | lkcl | mnemoc: yeah i'm thinking about a xN server standard because the EOMA-68 standard is basically done, first CPU Card out as soon as wits-tech put it together, get revision 0 tested and do revision 1 layout. |
| 16:20.54 | mnemoc | he puzzled me a lot with his question |
| 16:20.56 | mnemoc | too |
| 16:21.32 | lkcl | mnemoc: it's not "only lkcl knows" - i've been posting regularly e.g. http://lists.phcomp.co.uk/pipermail/arm-netbook/2012-October/006108.html |
| 16:22.19 | lkcl | i _do_ post status reports! |
| 16:22.25 | mnemoc | :) |
| 16:23.08 | mnemoc | as he is a regular I assumed what has happened after that one |
| 16:23.13 | lkcl | is in the middle of AM3892 schematics |
| 16:23.22 | lkcl | mnemoc: yeah that was a "huh" moment for me too |
| 16:23.47 | mnemoc | the question about SoM was .... unexpected |
| 16:24.07 | mnemoc | specially considering he says to have worked for ARM, Broadcom and now for nvidia |
| 16:24.12 | lkcl | i wanted 2x 32-bit DDR3 interfaces but i looked up the power consumption at 1100mhz and it's 1.5 watts (!) |
| 16:24.39 | lkcl | so... can only do 1, and might have to ramp it down in speed a bit (hopefully not as low as 800mhz) |
| 16:26.22 | lkcl | bit of a scarily-spec'd chip, the AM389x/DM816x series. full HD video encode *and* decode in the DM816x, and enough bandwidth to easily handle raw 1080p60 video. just... staggering. |
| 16:26.39 | mnemoc | imx6 didn't work out? |
| 16:26.52 | lkcl | imx6 has a proprietary GPU |
| 16:27.04 | mnemoc | and sitara is TI :p |
| 16:27.08 | lkcl | i picked the AM3892 because we need an FSF-Endorseable option |
| 16:27.10 | mnemoc | what's more scary? :) |
| 16:27.16 | lkcl | ha ha |
| 16:27.49 | lkcl | well, at least TI does FSF-endorseable SoCs that you can buy in 1k volumes |
| 16:28.22 | lkcl | it's there's a GPU-less imx6 i need to hear about it, get that moving as well |
| 16:28.37 | lkcl | christ - so much to fricking do. |
| 16:28.38 | Turl | wasn't amlogic a gpl violator? |
| 16:28.41 | Turl | what did I miss? o.O |
| 16:28.54 | lkcl | Turl: yeah, they are. not "was" - is. |
| 16:29.11 | Turl | why do you think it'll be fsf endorseable then? o.O |
| 16:29.14 | lkcl | made the request, they ignored it. |
| 16:29.38 | lkcl | Turl: which one? which SoC do you believe is being discussed, from which company? |
| 16:29.54 | mnemoc | Turl: htat's a TI sitara, not amlogic |
| 16:29.58 | Turl | lkcl: (13:27:08) lkcl: i picked the AM3892 because we need an FSF-Endorseable option |
| 16:30.01 | lkcl | texas instruments AM3892 is FSF-Endorseable. iMX6 is not |
| 16:30.20 | Turl | ah, so AM3892 is from TI? o.O |
| 16:30.24 | lkcl | Turl: yeah. that's AM3892 http://rhombus-tech.net/ti/am389x/ |
| 16:30.27 | mnemoc | they share chip id prefix :| |
| 16:30.42 | lkcl | not AML-8726 |
| 16:30.45 | Turl | is used to TI's OMAP series only |
| 16:30.53 | Turl | OMAP3XXX/4XXX |
| 16:30.59 | Turl | didn't know they had other series :P |
| 16:31.09 | lkcl | Turl: yehhhh, there's AM, DM and TMS320 as well |
| 16:31.24 | mnemoc | AM's have crappy or no video |
| 16:31.46 | lkcl | the full name of their davinci HD .... ah no they don't! ok, yes, the AM you're right |
| 16:32.23 | Turl | AM3892 (1.2ghz ARM Cortex A8) 1k pricing: $32. |
| 16:32.27 | mnemoc | TI's catalog is ... confusing |
| 16:32.31 | lkcl | but there's a pin-compatible one called the DM816x series (8165, 8167) which is an absolute raging monster. power consumption with all the bells, whistles and knobs on is 3.5 watts!! |
| 16:35.45 | mnemoc | lkcl: not interested in trying indiegogo.com yet? :< |
| 16:37.03 | mnemoc | tom made $50k in 10 days |
| 16:37.38 | mnemoc | enough to fund design, prototyping and a bunch of cards and eng boards |
| 16:38.43 | mnemoc | via paypal you receive 91% of the contributions immediatelly |
| 16:39.44 | mnemoc | and 5% "refunded" after the goal is reached |
| 16:41.27 | mnemoc | http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UwZEyN1K9s4 at 17:00 he makes an eoma related comment about upgrading his car |
| 16:45.10 | mnemoc | wants 19" all-in-one eoma68 computers for schools, POSs, guest's computer... :| |
| 16:47.51 | techn | mnemoc: btw. why we dont use jenkins as build interface? :) |
| 16:50.03 | mnemoc | i don't think we have a pace that justifies CI |
| 16:54.06 | techn | yep.. but I was thinking to have version/change history per build |
| 16:54.39 | techn | and those things come automaticly via ci.. no need to reinvent wheel |
| 16:55.04 | techn | but that's just HiFi stuff |
| 16:56.12 | Turl | mnemoc: what minute? :P |
| 16:57.11 | lkcl | mnemoc: the difference is that tom has a board. |
| 16:57.38 | lkcl | working, tested, proven board. |
| 16:58.06 | lkcl | mnemoc: we're still waiting for wits-tech to put the components on, test that, then do a re-lay-out, then test that. |
| 16:58.23 | lkcl | mnemoc: yeah me too! |
| 16:58.56 | lkcl | simultaneously i'm talking to the kde plasma team, they want a tablet, and they have a hell of a lot of preorders |
| 16:59.20 | lkcl | and also to the FSF. |
| 16:59.25 | lkcl | and more. |
| 16:59.40 | lkcl | all these projects need to be made *absolutely* clear, exactly what hardware is in them |
| 16:59.48 | lkcl | what the cost of *all* components are |
| 16:59.54 | lkcl | what the casework will cost. |
| 17:00.24 | lkcl | until all of that information is available, i am *not* going to go onto any of these sites and say "um, we need maybe this much, but we're not sure yet" |
| 17:00.30 | lkcl | and i'm definitely not going to lie! |
| 17:00.32 | lkcl | or guess |
| 17:01.38 | lkcl | so, yeah. hell of a lot to do. there's about *seven* EOMA-68 projects i'm keeping an eye on. there should actually be about... 20 (cards and products) |
| 17:02.23 | xxiao | 20 EOMA? impressive... |
| 17:02.49 | *** join/#arm-netbook specing (~specing@93-103-134-9.dynamic.t-2.net) |
| 17:02.50 | *** join/#arm-netbook specing (~specing@unaffiliated/specing) |
| 17:02.56 | lkcl | xxiao: it's what i'm aiming for. |
| 17:03.52 | lkcl | xxiao: think about it - this is the *entire* mass-volume appliances sector we're talking. laptops, tablets, nettops, netbooks, desktop pcs, media centres, PMPs, all-in-one PCs, keyboard computers, games consoles |
| 17:03.59 | lkcl | NAS boxes |
| 17:04.03 | lkcl | the works |
| 17:05.02 | xxiao | haven't checked eoma closely, what about heat issues? |
| 17:05.04 | lkcl | then there's CPU Cards, which will, once things are up and running, be at least 25% of the offerings of *every* SoC company combined, and that includes intel's new 22nm ValleyVille |
| 17:05.20 | lkcl | xxiao: the 3.5 watts limit has always been there. |
| 17:05.37 | lkcl | for slightly above that, you fill the case with thermal gel. |
| 17:05.59 | lkcl | messy but it works, and it's low-cost. |
| 17:05.59 | xxiao | recall qseven now |
| 17:06.17 | lkcl | xxiao: q-seven is great for the digital signage industry |
| 17:06.33 | lkcl | and for things like tiny desktop PCs |
| 17:06.40 | lkcl | and industrial computer uses. |
| 17:07.22 | lkcl | there's actually 3 separate competing MXM-based standards! |
| 17:07.41 | lkcl | http://elinux.org/Embedded_Open_Modular_Architecture#Alternative_Standards |
| 17:07.52 | lkcl | ULP-COM, EDM and Q7 |
| 17:07.54 | lkcl | ! |
| 17:08.05 | lkcl | ok, 3 that i've been able to find |
| 17:08.51 | xxiao | i actually think the stamp cpu module are very interesting |
| 17:09.51 | xxiao | cpu+ddr+nand with stamp dots around the littlt module, make it a cheap SIP (system in package) then solder it with various boards |
| 17:10.54 | xxiao | i was told the issue is that it's a little hard to unsolder for repair, as the hot air will also impact all chips on that little module along with its dots at the edge |
| 17:10.57 | *** join/#arm-netbook pwhalen (~paul@CPE001310360dac-CM78cd8ec9e405.cpe.net.cable.rogers.com) |
| 17:11.01 | xxiao | so you need a special tool for that |
| 17:11.12 | lkcl | oh do you mean package-on-package? |
| 17:11.28 | lkcl | or is this something different? |
| 17:12.42 | lkcl | xxiao: if PoP is anything to go by, then yes it's slightly fraught. although much much simpler to design (you don't need to do DDR layout or NAND layout) you *have* to watch out for supply of the DDR ICs, secure them *before* beginning the design |
| 17:13.20 | lkcl | and although prices are coming down and density is going up, they're a single chip RAM so they are *always* going to be more expensive than say 2 or 4 lower-density RAM ICs. |
| 17:15.29 | xxiao | lkcl: http://www.techor.com/prod-50.html |
| 17:16.39 | lkcl | ta |
| 17:16.57 | lkcl | ohh, ok - neat. |
| 17:16.58 | lkcl | thanks |
| 17:17.02 | lkcl | _another_ one : |
| 17:17.03 | lkcl | :) |
| 17:19.21 | lkcl | right. yeah. ok. yes, soldered directly onto another PCB. yeah, i can see how that would work, it's the same for e.g. what's it.... Telit and Motorola's 3G and GSM modules, you can get them in "solderable board" form |
| 17:19.31 | lkcl | yes. repair would be a bugger :) |
| 17:21.28 | *** join/#arm-netbook popolon (~popolon@og-free.planet-service.fr) |
| 17:29.31 | *** join/#arm-netbook t0dbld1 (~t0dbld@50.33.195.166) |
| 17:32.09 | xxiao | the key is to get high-speed bus contained there |
| 17:40.59 | *** join/#arm-netbook j^ (~j@2a01:4f8:120:3201::42) |
| 17:48.54 | jelly-home | thanks to whoever set up the gmane archive for arm-netbook... mailman/pipermail is a bit unfriendly |
| 17:49.32 | mnemoc | gmane is awesome |
| 17:57.36 | *** join/#arm-netbook Quarx|2 (~Quarx@178.74.79.135) |
| 17:57.59 | xxiao | for mailing list archive or irc channel log? |
| 17:58.02 | *** join/#arm-netbook t0dbld1 (~t0dbld@50.33.195.166) |
| 17:58.33 | mnemoc | mailing list archive with posting capabilities |
| 17:59.01 | mnemoc | ideal when you want to reply and don't have the parent in your mailbox |
| 17:59.41 | mnemoc | like when using a digest or when the mail was posted before you subscribed |
| 18:00.07 | xxiao | cool |
| 18:01.02 | *** join/#arm-netbook NAiL (~repvik@puck.tjene.re) |
| 18:01.20 | *** join/#arm-netbook jlj_ (~jlj@109-104-24-9.customers.ownit.se) |
| 18:05.02 | *** join/#arm-netbook robws1 (~robws1@38.99.170.111) |
| 18:05.10 | *** join/#arm-netbook Gujs_ (~Gujs@cpe-92-37-75-238.dynamic.amis.net) |
| 18:13.38 | *** join/#arm-netbook popolon (~popolon@og-free.planet-service.fr) |
| 18:14.27 | *** join/#arm-netbook Gumboot (~gumboot@rev.bovine.muck.net.nz) |
| 18:17.37 | jelly-home | also, nice ui for casual reading without subscribing http://news.gmane.org/gmane.comp.hardware.netbook.arm |
| 18:17.58 | mnemoc | sure |
| 18:26.16 | xxiao | lkcl: saw your post on am389x dm816x, i used them at job for 2 years, they're pretty hot |
| 18:34.32 | mnemoc | hot as emited heat or hot as sexy? |
| 18:38.59 | mnemoc | http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bVEhk0umqwQ |
| 18:48.12 | xxiao | heat |
| 18:48.29 | xxiao | eoma will be a cooking pad with it inside |
| 18:53.13 | mnemoc | not nice |
| 18:58.44 | *** join/#arm-netbook alcides (~alcides@177.35.118.65) |
| 18:58.46 | *** join/#arm-netbook alcides (~alcides@unaffiliated/alcides) |
| 19:11.05 | *** join/#arm-netbook ZaEarl (~malmrose@62.host-182-48-149.compassnet.co.nz) |
| 19:26.29 | *** join/#arm-netbook gimli (~gimli@xbmc/staff/gimli) |
| 19:52.51 | penguin42 | cubieboard seems to have met it's indiegogo funding |
| 19:55.42 | mnemoc | yes, yesterday. but they are all CC donations, so can't be withdraw until the end of the campaign in mid dec. |
| 19:57.49 | penguin42 | mnemoc: Oh that's a bit weird, I'd assumed that once it hit the target they could start |
| 19:59.10 | mnemoc | they have two methods to collect money, paypal. transfering the funds immediatelly to get paypal account of the campaign owner, and CC... making a wire transfer ~5d after the end of the campaign |
| 19:59.47 | mnemoc | but paypal blocked his account for review short after the campaign began |
| 19:59.58 | mnemoc | so all this money was collected via CC |
| 20:00.48 | mnemoc | will call on monday to ask indiegogo about the options |
| 20:00.58 | penguin42 | mnemoc: Ah annoying, it would seem sensible to let a campaign terminate early if they hit the money |
| 20:02.12 | mnemoc | yes, if they don't accept to do a pre-payment of the 50k, truncating the campaign will be the next thing to try |
| 20:02.24 | mnemoc | f* paypal |
| 20:06.34 | RaYmAn | I wonder what the paypal issue means for those people (like me) who did manage to buy using paypal |
| 20:06.49 | *** join/#arm-netbook RITRedbeard (~redbeard@c-68-37-165-37.hsd1.nj.comcast.net) |
| 20:07.00 | mnemoc | me too |
| 20:07.52 | mnemoc | it was $514 when it froze. but now it's already 50k+ over those 500 and all possible fees |
| 20:08.33 | mnemoc | i really hope they accept to wire them |
| 20:08.50 | mnemoc | to let them buy the components and start the manufacturing |
| 20:09.08 | RaYmAn | yeah |
| 20:12.31 | *** join/#arm-netbook newbie1 (~kvirc@220-136-107-217.dynamic.hinet.net) |
| 20:13.54 | discopig | crazy |
| 20:13.57 | discopig | the reached the goal so fast |
| 20:14.01 | discopig | they |
| 20:29.55 | *** join/#arm-netbook Gumboot (~sh1@rev.bovine.muck.net.nz) |
| 20:34.38 | techn | mnemoc: did he send mail for "notify me" ppl? |
| 20:35.37 | RaYmAn | he did |
| 20:36.06 | techn | ok |
| 20:37.21 | *** join/#arm-netbook ccssnet (~ccssnet@c-98-216-141-157.hsd1.ma.comcast.net) |
| 21:21.54 | *** join/#arm-netbook revident (~scott@76-10-173-74.dsl.teksavvy.com) |
| 21:32.17 | *** join/#arm-netbook drachenphone (~AndChat39@142.196.83.182) |
| 22:12.18 | *** join/#arm-netbook L84Supper (~ly@unaffiliated/l84supper) |
| 22:16.33 | *** join/#arm-netbook drachenphone (~AndChat39@142.196.83.182) |
| 22:39.58 | *** join/#arm-netbook The-Compiler (~compiler@ubuntuusers/supporter/the-compiler) |
| 22:46.59 | *** join/#arm-netbook shivansps (ba3a3593@gateway/web/freenode/ip.186.58.53.147) |
| 22:49.35 | shivansps | man it has to be a no feedback user the one to show up with the A10 13.3 notebook? http://www.aliexpress.com/item/Android-laptop-13-3-inch-notebook/672466819.html no way i gona buy from that guy :P |
| 22:52.06 | *** join/#arm-netbook L84Supper (~ly@unaffiliated/l84supper) |
| 22:52.29 | mnemoc | aliexpress doesn't pay the sellers until you are happy |
| 22:55.32 | shivansps | mmm |
| 23:02.58 | *** join/#arm-netbook The-Compiler (~compiler@ubuntuusers/supporter/the-compiler) |
| 23:11.54 | lkcl | xxiao: yeah i ran the spreadsheet from TI, i'm going to only use one 32-bit DDR3 RAM interface, and not push things. |
| 23:12.22 | lkcl | we'll have to fill the PCMCIA case with thermal gel |
| 23:12.43 | mnemoc | ouch |
| 23:15.47 | *** join/#arm-netbook L84Supper (~Larch@unaffiliated/l84supper) |
| 23:17.01 | specing | "Multi core: ARM Codex A8" LOL |
| 23:17.15 | specing | Guess the 1.5GHz thing wasn't enaugh |
| 23:19.53 | lkcl | specing: ehh, i did say it's a monster. 1.2 watts *each* to drive the two 1600mhz DDR3 RAM interfaces at top whack. |
| 23:20.14 | lkcl | irony is the ARM Cortex A8 core itself only uses 350mW! |
| 23:21.04 | specing | Not sure what the point for running the RAM at 1600 MHz is... |
| 23:21.40 | specing | 0.5W more just to get 5 cycles less latency on cache miss |
| 23:21.42 | lkcl | specing: the AM389x/DM816x design is capable of retrieving/capturing 1080p60 *raw* video data |
| 23:22.26 | lkcl | and the DM816x can do simultaneous *multiple* 1080p60 encode *and* decode (up to 3 channels) |
| 23:22.45 | lkcl | the bandwidth requirements for that kind of work is just phenomenal |
| 23:23.39 | lkcl | but yeah, i've set a limit of 1066mhz, see how people react: if it's still too much power i'll bring it down to 800mhz. reluctantly. |
| 23:23.51 | specing | Heh |
| 23:24.07 | specing | So you are looking at the AM*** already? |
| 23:24.12 | lkcl | 800mhz would bring it to sane levels. |
| 23:24.41 | lkcl | specing: i've got the bloody schematics 98% done already!! http://hands.com/~lkcl/eoma/ti/am3892/ |
| 23:25.07 | lkcl | i just took the EVM ones and the A10 EOMA68 ones and blotch, blotch combined the two :) |
| 23:43.34 | Gumboot | Five cycles seems like an enormous win. |
| 23:43.41 | Gumboot | How many are there in total? |
| 23:51.01 | *** join/#arm-netbook slapin (~slapin@94.25.228.124) |
| 23:56.02 | specing | 1 000 000 000 if it is doing one cycle per clock cycle |